CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in 17β-estradiol‑treated MCF7 cells

  • Authors:
    • Eduardo Portillo Del Campo
    • José Jorge Talamás Márquez
    • Francianella Reyes-Vargas
    • María Del Pilar Intriago-Ortega
    • Martha Angélica Quintanar-Escorza
    • Jorge Alberto Burciaga-Nava
    • Antonio Sifuentes-Alvarez
    • Miguel Reyes-Romero
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 15, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.200
  • Pages: 101-104
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Estrogens play a key role in breast cancer, with 60-70% of the cases expressing estrogen receptors (ERs), which are encoded by the ESR1 gene. CTCFL, a paralogue of the chromatin organizer CTCF, is a potential biomarker of breast cancer, but its expression in this disease is currently controversial. A positive correlation has been reported between CTCFL and ERs in breast tumors and there also exists a coordinated interaction between CTCF and ERs in breast cancer cells. Therefore, there appears to be an association between CTCF, CTCFL and estrogens in breast cancer; however, there has been no report on the effects of estrogens on CTCF and CTCFL expression. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 17β-estradiol (E2) on the CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line. the promoter methylation status of CTCFL and data mining for estrogen response elements in promoters of the CTCF and CTCFL genes were also determined. The transcription of CTCF and CTCFL was performed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and the promoter methylation status of CTCFL was determined by methylation‑specific PCR. The MCF7 cells exhibited basal transcription of CTCF, which was significantly downregulated to 0.68 by 1 µM E2; basal or E2‑regulated transcription of CTCFL was not detected. Under basal conditions, the CTCFL promoter was methylated. Through data mining, an estrogen response element was identified in the CTCF promoter, but no such element was found in CTCFL. These results suggested that estrogens may modulate CTCF expression, although there was no apparent association between ERs and CTCFL.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the leading cause of mortality among women worldwide, although the underlying molecular mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. Estrogens are crucial in breast cancer, with 60–70% of the cases expressing estrogen receptors (ERs), predominantly the α-ER, which is encoded by the ESR1 gene (1,2). Therefore, the elucidation of the mechanisms underlying the effect of estrogens on breast cancer is of paramount importance.

The CTCFL gene, encoding the CTCFL protein, also referred to as BORIS (Brother of the Regulator of Imprinting Sites), has recently emerged as a potential biomarker of female breast cancer, as it is normally expressed only by male germ cells. In a previous study, it was demonstrated that the CTCFL gene is expressed in malignant and non-malignant breast cell lines, as well as in ~70% of the clinical specimens of breast cancer, but not in normal breast tissue (3). CTCFL is a paralogue of CTCF, the gene encoding CTCF, a ubiquitous 11-zinc finger protein with highly versatile functions, such as the global three-dimensional genome organization, including intra- and interchromosomal loop formation (48). CTCF is involved in transcriptional silencing or activation and may function as an insulator and chromatin organizer. CTCF shares the 11-zinc finger protein region with CTCFL and the co-expression of the two genes was previously demonstrated in breast cancer (9). However, the expression of CTCFL in breast cancer is currently highly controversial. Since the first report of its expression in the majority of clinical breast specimens (3), subsequent studies were highly divergent, with results ranging from complete absence of CTCFL expression in breast cancer (10), to its ubiquitous expression in normal and malignant tissues (11).

A positive correlation between the levels of CTCFL and ER in breast tumors was previously described (3), suggesting that CTCFL may be under estrogen regulation. In addition, there exists a coordinated interaction between CTCF and ER in breast cancer cells, as CTCF binding to DNA co-localizes with ER sites (12,13); it is hypothesized that in these sites of co-localization, CTCF may mark the euchromatic regions, allowing ER to bind and activate or repress the expression of target genes. Therefore, a pro-transcriptional role was suggested for CTCF in ER-mediated gene expression in breast cancer cells (13). CTCF and CTCFL appear to be associated with estrogens and ER in breast cancer; however, the knowledge on this subject is currently scant.

The role of estrogens on the regulation of CTCF and CTCFL gene expression has not yet been investigated and its determination may help elucidate the biology of breast cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of 17β-estradiol (E2) on the CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in MCF7 breast cancer cells, which represent a suited model for the in vitro study of estrogenic pathways, as they express ERs.

Materials and methods

Cells

The MCF7 (HTB-22) cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). This cell line was derived from the breast adenocarcinoma of a Caucasian female and was shown to express ERs. The MCF7 cells also express high CTCF levels (14).

Cell culture conditions

Immediately following their acquisition, the MCF7 cells were propagated by culture in 60-mm polystyrene dishes with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), amphotericin and gentamycin, at 37°C in a 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere. In order to determine the estrogenic effect on CTCF and CTCFL transcription, the MCF7 cell cultures at high density were incubated for 24 h in DMEM, with 0.2% human albumin instead of FBS. Subsequently, the cells were incubated for 20 h with E2 (1,3,5-estratriene-3,17β-diol; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at concentrations of 0.01, 0.1 and 1 μM. At the end of the incubation period, total RNA was obtained with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantitation and purity were determined by spectrophotometry in a Beckman Coulter DU730 apparatus (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA) at an absorbance of 260 nm and an absorbance ratio of 260/280 nm, respectively. The final product was stored at −40°C until use in quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) within the following 3 days.

The E2 was prepared as a 1×10−3 M stock solution in absolute ethanol. The controls included ethanol, which in previous experiments did not exert any effect on the expression of the genes under investigation. The experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times per biological replica.

qPCR for CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression

First, cDNA was synthesized in 20-μl volume reactions from 1 μg total RNA with the Verso cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The obtained cDNA (1 μl) was then amplified in 15-μl volume reactions with gene-specific primers and probes of the Solaris qPCR Gene Expression Assay system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. GAPDH was used as a reference gene due to its good performance, as previously reported (15). The primers had consensus sequences that recognized all the splice variants of the genes under investigation and they all exhibited identical temperature conditions for amplification. qPCR was performed in a Eco thermocycler (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) under the following conditions: a 15-min step at 95°C to activate polymerase, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for DNA denaturation and 60°C for annealing-extension. The efficiency of the reactions was 99, 95 and 101% for GAPDH, CTCF and CTCFL, respectively. A formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimen of breast cancer expressing CTCFL was used to determine the efficiency and specificity of the amplification of this gene, as its expression in MCF7 cells was not detected under any conditions, as described below.

Statistical analysis

The comparative data were analyzed with REST 2009 software (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) employing 6,000 randomizations. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Methylation analysis of the CTCFL promoter

Genomic DNA (1 μg) was bisulfite-modified with the Imprint DNA Modification kit (MOD50; Sigma-Aldrich) and eluted in a final volume of 20 μl, following the manufacturer’s protocol. The modified DNA was stored at −40°C and used within 1 week. Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) for the CTCFL promoter was performed with 1 μl of the modified DNA in a final reaction volume of 25 μl, containing 12.5 μl of GoTaq Master Mix (Promega Inc., Madison, WI, USA), 0.5 μl of each forward and reverse primers described elsewhere (16), and 10.5 μl of water.

The PCR amplification consisted of 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 45 sec, annealing at 55°C for 45 sec and extension at 72°C for 45 sec. The amplification products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining.

Estrogen response elements in CTCF and CTCFL promoters

Data mining for localization of the ER binding sites in the human CTCF and CTCFL promoter was performed using the online software LASAGNA-Search, developed by the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT (17) available at http://biogrid.engr.uconn.edu/lasagna_search/.

Results

Effect of E2 on CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression

In order to investigate the effects of E2 on the mRNA transcription of CTCF and CTCFL, qRT-PCR was performed. The MCF7 cells exhibited a basal mRNA transcription as expected. E2 exerted a statistically significant downregulating effect to 0.68 the value of the control. E2 at concentrations of 0.01 and 0.01 μM also exerted a downregulating effect, although it was of no statistical significance (Table I).

Table I

Effect of E2 on CTCF transcription in MCF7 cells.

Table I

Effect of E2 on CTCF transcription in MCF7 cells.

E2 (μM)Relative expression95% CIP-value
0.010.8340.588–1.1770.201
0.10.8300.368–1.6620.177
10.6840.343–0.8570.000

[i] E2, 17β-estradiol; CI, confidence interval.

By contrast, basal transcription of CTCFL in MCF7 cells was not detected and incubation with E2 did not result in CTCFL mRNA upregulation under any hormone concentration. Therefore, the possible downregulating effects of E2 on CTCFL expression could not be assessed.

Analysis of methylation of the CTCFL promoter

To further investigate the underlying mechanisms responsible for the lack of expression of the CTCFL gene, the methylation state of its promoter was determined by MSP under basal conditions and only the methylated promoter was detected (Fig. 1), which was suggestive of gene silencing.

Data mining for estrogen response elements in the CTCF and CTCFL promoters

As estrogen response elements have not been described in the CTCF and CTCFL promoters, a search for consensus sequences was performed with the LASAGNA-Search software. Only a consensus sequence for CTCF was identified in the minus strand, 247 bp upstream from the transcription start site; this sequence was GTCCGCTTGACCT. By contrast, consensus sequences for CTCFL were not identified.

Discussion

ER are the driving transcription factors in the majority of breast cancers; when coupled to estrogens they activate or inhibit genes involved in cell cycle progression and cell survival during malignant transformation. CTCF is linked to the ER biology through interactions that have not yet been fully elucidated. CTCFL is a CTCF paralogue, which is expressed in breast cancer. To date, a role for estrogens in the regulation of CTCF and CTCFL expression has not been reported. In this study, the effect of E2 on the transcription of the CTCF and CTCFL genes in the MCF7 breast cancer cell line was investigated.

We did not detect any basal CTCFL transcription in MCF7 cells. There are discordant reports regarding CTCFL expression in this cell line; Hines et al(10) and Vatolin et al(18) did not detect any CTCFL expression by conventional RT-PCR and/or qPCR methods. By contrast, Renaud et al(19) reported CTCFL expression in MCF7 cells measured by qPCR and northern blot analysis. In addition, D’Arcy et al(3) detected CTCFL expression by RT-PCR, western blot analysis and immunostaining. The inconsistency between those studies may be attributed to the heteroclonal nature of MCF7 cells; this cell line was established in 1973 and MCF7 cells have since been widely distributed worldwide, resulting in different stocks exhibiting clonal heterogeneity (20). In the studies that were in agreement with the present study, the source of MCF7 cells was not specified by Vatolin et al(18), who mentioned that some of the cell lines they used were obtained from ATTC, whereas Hines et al(10) mentioned that the cell lines were obtained from ATCC. As regards studies in disagreement with the present study, D’Arcy et al(3) acknowledge M. O’Hare and B. Gusterson for providing breast cell lines, whereas Renaud et al(19) did not mention the source. Therefore, the clonal heterogeneity of the MCF7 cells appears to be a plausible explanation for the divergence in CTCFL expression results.

Basal expression of CTCF was found as expected, according to previously reported findings (14). CTCF is a ubiquitously expressed regulator of fundamental cellular events, including transcription, intra- and interchromosomal interactions and chromatin structure (7). The ENCODE project (21) unveiled the significance of CTCF in long-range chromatin interactions. A total of 77,811 distinct binding sites for CTCF were identified across 19 cell types, which underlines the importance of this factor in maintaining genome integrity (22), although up- and downregulation of its expression by diverse stimuli have been reported; for example, CTCF overexpression has been associated with resistance to apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines (14) and its downregulation has been reported in epithelial ovarian cancer (23). In this study, a downregulating effect on CTCF transcription by E2 was documented; thus, further studies are required to investigate whether this hormone modulates CTCF transcription in vivo, directly or indirectly.

The results of the promoter methylation analysis of CTCFL are in agreement with the results obtained from the gene transcription analysis depicted above, as the methylation of the CTCFL promoter is indicative of gene silencing.

Furthermore, the data mining for consensus sequences of estrogen response elements in the promoters was in agreement with the results, as only a sequence for CTCF was identified, suggesting that it is a target for ERs, unlike CTCFL. However, distant estrogen response elements in the genes and long-range interactions, as well as indirect effects of E2 on the two genes, cannot be excluded.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that E2 downregulated CTCF mRNA expression in MCF7 cells, which did not exhibit basal transcription of CTCFL, whereas E2 did not exert any upregulating effects on CTCFL mRNA. These results suggest that there is an independent association between ER positivity and CTCFL expression in breast cancer. However, further investigations on this subject are required.

Acknowledgements

E.P.D.C. received a fellowship as a research assistant from the Council of Science and Technology of the State of Durango (COCYTED), Durango, Mexico.

References

1 

Russo J and Russo IH: The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 102:89–96. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Castoria G, Migliaccio A, Giovannelli P and Auricchio F: Cell proliferation regulated by estradiol receptor: Therapeutic implications. Steroids. 75:524–527. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

D’Arcy V, Pore N, Docquier F, et al: BORIS, a paralogue of the transcription factor, CTCF, is aberrantly expressed in breast tumours. Br J Cancer. 98:571–579. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Phillips JE and Corces VG: CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell. 137:1194–1211. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ohlsson R, Lobanenkov V and Klenova E: Does CTCF mediate between nuclear organization and gene expression? Bioessays. 32:37–50. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Botta M, Haider S, Leung IX, Lio P and Mozziconacci J: Intra- and inter-chromosomal interactions correlate with CTCF binding genome wide. Mol Syst Biol. 6:4262010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Handoko L, Xu H, Li G, et al: CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nat Genet. 43:630–638. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Nakahashi H, Kwon KR, Resch W, et al: A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. Cell Rep. 3:1678–1689. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Loukinov DI, Pugacheva E, Vatolin S, et al: BORIS, a novel male germ-line-specific protein associated with epigenetic reprogramming events, shares the same 11-zinc-finger domain with CTCF, the insulator protein involved in reading imprinting marks in the soma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:6806–6811. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Hines WC, Bazarov AV, Mukhopadhyay R and Yaswen P: BORIS (CTCFL) is not expressed in most human breast cell lines and high grade breast carcinomas. PLoS One. 5:e97382010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Jones TA, Ogunkolade BW, Szary J, et al: Widespread expression of BORIS/CTCFL in normal and cancer cells. PLoS One. 6:e223992011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Dutertre M, Gratadou L, Dardenne E, et al: Estrogen regulation and physiopathologic significance of alternative promoters in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 70:3760–3770. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Ross-Innes CS, Brown GD and Carroll JS: A co-ordinated interaction between CTCF and ER in breast cancer cells. BMC Genomics. 12:5932011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Docquier F, Farrar D, D’Arcy V, et al: Heightened expression of CTCF in breast cancer cells is associated with resistance to apoptosis. Cancer Res. 65:5112–5122. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lanoix D, Lacasse AA, St-Pierre J, Taylor SC, Ethier-Chiasson M, Lafond J and Vaillancourt C: Quantitative PCR pitfalls: the case of the human placenta. Mol Biotechnol. 52:234–243. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Hong JA, Kang Y, Abdullaev Z, et al: Reciprocal binding of CTCF and BORIS to the NY-ESO-1 promoter coincides with derepression of this cancer-testis gene in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 65:7763–7774. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lee C and Huang CH: LASAGNA-Search: an integrated web tool for transcription factor binding site search and visualization. Biotechniques. 54:141–153. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Vatolin S, Abdullaev Z, Pack SD, et al: Conditional expression of the CTCF-paralogous transcriptional factor BORIS in normal cells results in demethylation and derepression of MAGE-A1 and reactivation of other cancer-testis genes. Cancer Res. 65:7751–7762. 2005.

19 

Renaud S, Pugacheva EM, Delgado MD, et al: Expression of the CTCF-paralogous cancer-testis gene, brother of the regulator of imprinted sites (BORIS), is regulated by three alternative promoters modulated by CpG methylation and by CTCF and p53 transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:7372–7388. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Nugoli M, Chuchana P, Vendrell J, et al: Genetic variability in MCF-7 sublines: evidence of rapid genomic and RNA expression profile modifications. BMC Cancer. 3:132003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

ENCODE Project Consortium. Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, et al: An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 489:57–74. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Wang H, Maurano MT, Qu H, et al: Widespread plasticity in CTCF occupancy linked to DNA methylation. Genome Res. 22:1680–1688. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Link PA, Zhang W, Odunsi K and Karpf AR: BORIS/CTCFL mRNA isoform expression and epigenetic regulation in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Immun. 13:62013.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-February 2014
Volume 2 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Del Campo EP, Talamás Márquez JJ, Reyes-Vargas F, Del Pilar Intriago-Ortega M, Quintanar-Escorza MA, Burciaga-Nava JA, Sifuentes-Alvarez A and Reyes-Romero M: CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in 17β-estradiol‑treated MCF7 cells. Biomed Rep 2: 101-104, 2014.
APA
Del Campo, E.P., Talamás Márquez, J.J., Reyes-Vargas, F., Del Pilar Intriago-Ortega, M., Quintanar-Escorza, M.A., Burciaga-Nava, J.A. ... Reyes-Romero, M. (2014). CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in 17β-estradiol‑treated MCF7 cells. Biomedical Reports, 2, 101-104. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.200
MLA
Del Campo, E. P., Talamás Márquez, J. J., Reyes-Vargas, F., Del Pilar Intriago-Ortega, M., Quintanar-Escorza, M. A., Burciaga-Nava, J. A., Sifuentes-Alvarez, A., Reyes-Romero, M."CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in 17β-estradiol‑treated MCF7 cells". Biomedical Reports 2.1 (2014): 101-104.
Chicago
Del Campo, E. P., Talamás Márquez, J. J., Reyes-Vargas, F., Del Pilar Intriago-Ortega, M., Quintanar-Escorza, M. A., Burciaga-Nava, J. A., Sifuentes-Alvarez, A., Reyes-Romero, M."CTCF and CTCFL mRNA expression in 17β-estradiol‑treated MCF7 cells". Biomedical Reports 2, no. 1 (2014): 101-104. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2013.200