Higher serum uric acid levels and advanced age are associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal polyps

  • Authors:
    • Minoru Tomizawa
    • Fuminobu Shinozaki
    • Rumiko Hasegawa
    • Yoshinori Shirai
    • Yasufumi Motoyoshi
    • Takao Sugiyama
    • Shigenori Yamamoto
    • Naoki Ishige
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 10, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.487
  • Pages: 637-640
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study retrospectively analyzed the laboratory data of patients who had undergone a colonoscopy between April 2011 and March 2014, with the aim of assessing whether these variables could be used to predict the presence of colorectal polyps (CP). A total of 1,471 patients were enrolled (731 men, 68.5±10.8 years; 740 women, 66.7±10.8 years). One‑way analysis of variance was performed to analyze the association between the presence of CP and a range of laboratory variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a regression equation to predict the presence of CP. Receiver‑operator characteristics analysis was applied to investigate the performance of the regression equation. Patients with CP were older than those without CP (P<0.0001). Serum uric acid (UA) levels were higher in patients with CP, compared to those without CP (P=0.0007). To investigate the possibility that older age and higher UA levels could predict the presence of CP, logistic regression analysis was performed (P=0.0008). The regression equation was as follows: ln(p/1 - p) = 2.79015 ‑ 0.01836 x age ‑ 0.28542 x UA (mg/dl), where p indicates the presence of CP. Receiver‑operator characteristic analysis showed the area under the curve to be 0.62092 and the threshold value of P was 0.4370. Sensitivity and specificity of the threshold value were 77.6 and 44.2%, respectively. Advanced age and higher serum UA levels were associated with the presence of CP. In conclusion, logistic regression analysis obtained a regression equation that predicted the presence of CP with a higher sensitivity, but poorer specificity, compared to fecal occult blood testing.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is frequently encountered in clinical practice (1). Long-term surveillance indicates that the majority of colorectal cancers arise from colorectal polyps (CP) (2). Polypectomy reduces the risk of fatality from colorectal cancer (3,4). Screening using colonoscopy has also been shown to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer-related fatality (5,6). However, colonoscopy is not available to all populations or patients, as it requires a skilled operator and therefore is associated with a significant cost (7). As colonoscopy is a limited resource, screening methods are required to select patients to undergo the procedure.

Fecal occult blood testing is widely available and reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (8). Fecal occult blood testing is useful for the diagnosis of advanced colorectal cancer (9); however, such an advanced cancer would not be amenable to polypectomy and therefore fecal occult blood testing is not suitable for the detection of patients with CP (10).

It is recommended that laboratory tests are completed prior to subjecting a patient to a colonoscopy, as this practice is associated with reduced rates of complications and lower costs (11). A correlation between laboratory test results and the presence of CP, however, has not been reported.

The rate of CP detection is 37% for surveillance colonoscopy and 25% for screening (12). Kim et al (13), in an analysis of risk factors for CP, reported that CPs were identified in 47% of patients who underwent colonoscopy. The authors analyzed the association of CP with total cholesterol (T-Chol), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. In a similar study, Huang et al (14) analyzed the association between CP and TG, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). These two studies concluded that the presence of CP is associated with metabolic risk factors. Therefore, it is expected that laboratory variables may be correlated with the presence of CP. The present study investigated whether laboratory variables are useful for predicting the presence of CP.

Materials and methods

Patients

Patient records for the period between April 2011 and March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 1,520 patients underwent colonoscopy during this period. The majority of colorectal cancers arise from CP, which progress via the adenoma-carcinoma sequence (15). In rare cases, de novo colorectal cancers occur (16) and it can sometimes be hard to distinguish between the adenoma-carcinoma sequence and de novo carcinogenesis. Patients with colorectal cancer (n=49) were therefore excluded from the analysis, leaving 1,471 eligible patients; 731 men (mean age, 68.5±10.8 years) and 740 women (mean age, 66.7±10.8 years). The study was submitted to the institutional ethical committee at the National Hospital Organization, Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Chiba, Japan) and assigned as not a clinical trial, since it was performed as part of routine clinical practice. Patient anonymity was preserved.

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy was performed for patients with abdominal symptoms, anemia or a positive fecal occult blood test result. Colonoscopy was also performed for screening. The colonoscopes used were CF-Q260 and PCF-Q260AI (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The withdrawal time of colonoscopy ranged from 10 to 30 min. The diameter of the smallest polyps detected was 2 mm.

Laboratory variables

The variables analyzed as potential predictors of CP included white blood cell count, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, platelet count, total protein, albumin level, total bilirubin level, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, uric acid (UA), blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, T-Chol, TG, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, blood glucose, HbA1c, body mass index, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Blood was collected in the fasting period from the majority of patients.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyze the association between each variable and the presence of CP. The mean UA level was analyzed, according to age group, with one-way ANOVA. A χ2 test was performed to analyze the association between age group and CP prevalence. The χ2 test was also applied to analyze the correlation between the percentage of patients with UA >7 mg/dl. Logistic regression analysis was performed to establish a regression equation that could predict the presence of CP. Receiver-operator characteristic analysis was applied to investigate the performance of the regression equation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. JMP 10.0.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Associations between laboratory variables and presence of CP

The associations between each laboratory test variable and the presence of CP is presented in Table I. Not all the patients were subjected to each laboratory test. Patients with CP were of a more advanced age compared to those without CP (P<0.0001). Serum UA levels were higher in patients with CP, compared with those without CP (P=0.0007). These results suggest that age and UA level were strongly associated with the presence of CP; these variables were chosen for further analysis.

Table I.

Descriptive statistics for age and laboratory variables, according to colorectal polyp (CP) status.

Table I.

Descriptive statistics for age and laboratory variables, according to colorectal polyp (CP) status.

Colonoscopy negative for CPColonoscopy positive for CP


VariablesPatients, no.Patients, no.Mean ± SDPatients, no.Mean ± SDP-value
Age, years1,471775 66.4±11.9696 68.9±9.4<0.0001
WBC, 102/µl  698381 6961±2087317 6134±18840.2559
Hb, g/dl  697381 13.0±2.1316 13.1±2.10.3069
CRP, mg/dl  376209 0.77±1.99167 0.88±3.450.6958
Plt, 104/µl  690378 21.9±7.1312 22.2±6.90.5895
TP, g/dl  452254 6.9±0.8198 6.9±0.70.4954
Alb, g/dl  334181 4.1±0.5153 4.0±0.60.2336
T-Bil, mg/dl  462260 0.77±0.46202 0.74±0.320.4288
ALP, IU/l  244130 233.1±81.7114 229.0±84.50.6964
AST, IU/l  634335 25.1±25.3279 25.4±11.90.8642
ALT, IU/l  668366 22.6±28.0302 23.1±0.80.7863
GGT, IU/l  279147 56.3±274.7132 44.9±57.50.6401
LDH, IU/l  363192 201.3±60.7171 205.9±124.80.6508
UA, mg/dl  272138 5.0±1.4134 5.5±1.40.0007
BUN, mg/dl  434234 14.9±4.8200 16.5±14.50.1109
Cr, mg/dl  670367 0.84±0.44303 0.86±0.250.3734
T-Chol, mg/dl   273164 204.9±39.9109 196.4±33.60.0703
TG, mg/dl   253117 124.7±81.9136 138.2±79.80.1867
HDL, mg/dl   192103 61.3±17.6  89 56.4±16.30.0512
LDL, mg/dl   264129 118.4±29.7135 117.5±25.40.7762
BG, mg/dl   350184 116.6±39.0166 122±46.80.1892
HbA1c, %   172  83 6.2±1.0  89 6.2±1.10.7721
BMI, kg/m2   252124 22.5±3.9128 22.5±3.60.8825
CEA, ng/ml   183  99 12.0±63.3  84 49.1±391.50.3550
CA19-9, U/ml   182  98 14.7±12.4  84 38.8±221.70.2836

[i] Number of patients refers to the total number subjected to each laboratory test. WBC, white blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; CRP, C-reactive protein; Plt, platelet; TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; T-Bil, total bilirubin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UA, uric acid; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; T-Chol, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BG, blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; BMI, body mass index; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA19-9, carbohydrate antigen 19-9; SD, standard deviation.

Association between age and presence of CP

The association between the percentage of patients with CP and age is illustrated in Fig. 1; the presence of CP increased with age. This association was statistically significant (P=0.0001) (Table II). The number of patients in their 20s and 90s were 3 and 5, respectively. As these ages were significantly fewer in number compared with the other age groups, these patients were omitted from further analysis.

Table II.

Association between age and prevalence of colorectal polyps (CP).

Table II.

Association between age and prevalence of colorectal polyps (CP).

CP (−)CP (+)


Age group, yearsPatients, no.%χ2 test%χ2 test
30  3183.95.722516.16.3720
40  9266.33.238933.73.6065
5012060.01.218740.01.3570
6049751.30.179048.70.1993
7057749.11.449850.91.6144
8014649.30.314850.70.3505

[i] χ2 test was performed to clarify the association between age and the presence of colorectal polyps. P=0.0001. CP (−), patients without colorectal polyps; CP (+), patients with colorectal polyps.

Serum UA level and the presence of CP

The serum UA level was correlated with the presence of CP; however, there was a possibility that this association was confounded by an association of UA level with age. Fig. 2 indicates that there was no association between a higher UA level and age.

The χ2 test confirmed an absence of correlation between UA level and age (P=0.6279).

The above data indicated that the presence of CP correlated with aging and UA. To investigate the possibility that age and UA level could predict the presence of CP, logistic regression analysis was performed (P=0.0008) (Table III). The regression equation was as follows: ln(p/1 − p) = 2.79015 − 0.01836 × age − 0.28542 × UA level (mg/dl), where p represents the presence of CP.

Table III.

Logistic regression analysis for the association between age and serum uric acid level.

Table III.

Logistic regression analysis for the association between age and serum uric acid level.

Characteristicsχ2 testOddsLikelihood test (P-value)
Age   2.530.9818080.1083
Uric acid10.030.7517010.0011

The likelihood ratio χ2 test showed a P-value for age and UA level of 0.1083 and 0.0011, respectively, indicating a strong correlation between UA level and the presence of CP.

Receiver-operator characteristic analysis

To investigate how well the regression equation predicted the presence of CP, receiver-operator characteristic analysis was applied (Fig. 3). The area under the curve was 0.62092. The threshold value of P was 0.4370, and the sensitivity and specificity of the threshold value were 77.6 and 44.2%, respectively.

Discussion

Previous investigations into the correlation between laboratory test results and the presence of CP have focused on components of metabolic syndrome (17), and the literature regarding the association between UA level and the presence of CP is limited. Orannapalai et al (18) analyzed the correlation between laboratory test results and the presence of CP. Patients were divided into 2 groups, based on UA level; >7 and ≤7 mg/dl. The presence of CP was higher in the group with a UA level of >7 mg/dl. In the present study, the average level of UA was higher in patients with CP compared with patients without CP, which is consistent with the results of the previous report. The underlying reason for this association is unknown. Notably, Karaman et al (19) found that the average UA level was higher in patients with neoplastic CP, as compared to those with non-neoplastic CP. Patients with a higher UA level are also prone to cancer of the colon, liver and lung (20). These results suggest that a raised serum UA level may be involved in tumorigenesis (21).

There is limited information available on the CP predictors. Eisner et al (22) performed urinary metabolomics in search of such a predictor and reported that nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolites and the degradation of ketone bodies are associated with the presence of CP. They proposed a tool involving the use of urinary metabolomics to select patients at risk of CP, who would undergo further investigation with colonoscopy. The performance of this tool is more efficient than that of fecal occult blood testing. In the present study, age and UA level were associated with the presence of CP. It has previously been reported that advanced age is associated with the presence of CP (23). UA levels are also higher in patients with CP, as discussed above. The present data are therefore consistent with previous reports. Fecal occult blood testing is intended to select patients with colorectal cancer, rather than pre-cancerous CP (24). Eisner et al (22) analyzed fecal occult blood testing as a tool for the detection of CP. Fecal occult blood testing has been shown to have a sensitivity of 2.6–15.1% and a specificity of 94.5–99.4%. In terms of the detection of CP using UA level, the present regression equation showed a greater sensitivity, but a poorer specificity.

In conclusion, advanced age and higher serum UA levels are associated with the presence of CP. Logistic regression analysis obtained a regression equation with a greater sensitivity and poorer specificity for the detection of CP, compared with fecal occult blood testing.

References

1 

Brenner H, Kloor M and Pox CP: Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 383:1490–1502. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Stoian M, State N, Rusu E, Stoica V, Gavril RS, Gherasim A and Radulian G: Malignancy and mortality of colorectal polyps. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 118:399–406. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Hankey BF, Shi W, Bond JH, Schapiro M, Panish JF, et al: Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 366:687–696. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Anderloni A, Jovani M, Hassan C and Repici A: Advances, problems and complications of polypectomy. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 7:285–296. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Manser CN, Bachmann LM, Brunner J, Hunold F, Bauerfeind P and Marbet UA: Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: A closed cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 76:110–117. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Rosa I, Fidalgo P, Soares J, Vinga S, Oliveira C, Silva JP, Ferro SM, Chaves P, Oliveira AG and Leitão CN: Adenoma incidence decreases under the effect of polypectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 18:1243–1248. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Wallace MB and Kiesslich R: Advances in endoscopic imaging of colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 138:2140–2150. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, Lederle FA, Bond JH, Mandel JS and Church TR: Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 369:1106–1114. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Viana Freitas BR, Kibune Nagasako C, Pavan CR, Silva Lorena SL, Guerrazzi F, Saddy Rodrigues Coy C, Ayrizono ML and Mesquita MA: Immunochemical fecal occult blood test for detection of advanced colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer: Comparison with colonoscopy results. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013:384–561. 2013.

10 

Bretagne JF, Manfredi S, Piette C, Hamonic S, Durand G and Riou F: Yield of high-grade dysplasia based on polyp size detected at colonoscopy: A series of 2295 examinations following a positive fecal occult blood test in a population-based study. Dis Colon Rectum. 53:339–345. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Sonnenberg A: Test sequence in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy. 44:43–47. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Goodrich M, Robinson CM and Weiss JE: Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 11:1308–1312. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kim YJ, Lee KJ, Park SY, Han JH, Kwon KY and Kim JH: Association between Dyslipidemia and the Prevalence of Colon Polyps Based on a Health Evaluation of Subjects at a Hospital. Korean J Fam Med. 35:143–151. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Huang HE, Yang YC, Wu JS, Wang RH, Lu FH and Chang CJ: The relationship between different glycemic statuses and colon polyps in a Taiwanese population. J Gastroenterol. 49:1145–1151. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Al-Sohaily S, Biankin A, Leong R, Kohonen-Corish M and Warusavitarne J: Molecular pathways in colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 27:1423–1431. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Tanaka T: Colorectal carcinogenesis: Review of human and experimental animal studies. J Carcinog. 8:52009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Kim BC, Shin A, Hong CW, Sohn DK, Han KS, Ryu KH, Park BJ, Nam JH, Park JW, Chang HJ, et al: Association of colorectal adenoma with components of metabolic syndrome. Cancer Causes Control. 23:727–735. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Orannapalai N, Attawettayanon W, Kanngern S, Boonpipattanapong T and Sangkhathat S: Predicting the occurrence of cancer-associated colorectal polyp using a metabolic risk score. Mol Clin Oncol. 2:124–128. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Karaman H, Karaman A, Erden A, Poyrazoglu OK, Karakukcu C and Tasdemir A: Relationship between colonic polyp type and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 14:3159–3161. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Boffetta P, Nordenvall C, Nyrén O and Ye W: A prospective study of gout and cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev. 18:127–132. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Wilson FP and Berns JS: Tumor lysis syndrome: New challenges and recent advances. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 21:18–26. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Eisner R, Greiner R, Tso V, Wang H and Fedorak RN: A machine-learned predictor of colonic polyps based on urinary metabolomics. Biomed Res Int. 2013:3039822013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Clipp EC, Carver EH, Pollak KI, Puleo E, Emmons KM, Onken J, Farraye FA and McBride CM: Age-related vulnerabilities of older adults with colon adenomas: Evidence from Project Prevent. Cancer. 100:1085–1094. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Launois R, Le Moine JG, Uzzan B, Fiestas Navarrete LI and Benamouzig R: Systematic review and bivariate/HSROC random-effect meta-analysis of immunochemical and guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26:978–989. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2015
Volume 3 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Shirai Y, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Ishige N: Higher serum uric acid levels and advanced age are associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal polyps. Biomed Rep 3: 637-640, 2015.
APA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T. ... Ishige, N. (2015). Higher serum uric acid levels and advanced age are associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal polyps. Biomedical Reports, 3, 637-640. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.487
MLA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Ishige, N."Higher serum uric acid levels and advanced age are associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal polyps". Biomedical Reports 3.5 (2015): 637-640.
Chicago
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Ishige, N."Higher serum uric acid levels and advanced age are associated with an increased prevalence of colorectal polyps". Biomedical Reports 3, no. 5 (2015): 637-640. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.487