hOGG1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome

  • Authors:
    • Yanjie Xia
    • Wenqing Wang
    • Lei Wang
    • Shanmei Shen
    • Yunxia Cao
    • Long Yi
    • Qian Gao
    • Yong Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 16, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.600
  • Pages: 421-426
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Oxidative stress generates 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanine (8-oxodG), which can structurally modify DNA. Glycosylase hOGG1 can remove the mutagenic lesion 8-oxodG from DNA. The aim of the present study was to determine whether polymorphisms in hOGG1 were associated with the risk of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). One common single-nucleotide polymorphism (Ser326Cys) in exon 7 and four rare polymorphisms (c.‑18G>T, c.‑23A>G, c.‑45G>A and c. ‑53G>C) were screened in the 5' untranslated region of the hOGG1 gene. No such distributional differences were observed between the PCOS patients and controls either in the genotype frequency or in the allele frequency. There were no differences in the clinical variables among the different genotypes in all the variants, except that the follicle-stimulating hormone level was elevated in the GC genotype of c. ‑53G>C in PCOS patients (P=0.002). These results suggest that the polymorphisms in hOGG1 may not be an independent risk factor for PCOS.

Introduction

In the living cells of aerobic organisms, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are continuously produced in various physiological processes, such as metabolic and other biochemical reactions. A low level of ROS is essential for maintaining physiological function and biochemical pathway processing, including intracellular signaling pathways in cell differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis (1) and immunity (2). By contrast, high levels of ROS can cause oxidative stress damaging biological macromolecules, such as membrane lipids, proteins and DNA, which may lead to metabolic malfunctions (35). 8-Hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanine (8-OHdG) induces ROS-mediated oxidative damage by promoting the transversion of G/C to A/T, as it has a higher affinity for pairing with adenine (A) rather than cytosine (C) (6). Base excision repair (BER) of DNA reverses a number of spontaneous and environmentally induced genotoxic or miscoding base lesions in a process initiated by DNA glycosylases (7). Human OGG1 (hOGG1) efficiently repairs the incorrect or damaged bases by removing 8-OHdG, as part of the BER pathway (8).

Previous studies have reported several polymorphisms in the hOGG1 gene (9,10). In vitro activity assays confirmed that some of the variants affect hOGG1 expression resulting in a substantially higher DNA repair activity. Variants in the hOGG1 gene have been investigated in numerous diseases (1113). A number of genetic variants in the hOGG1 gene may alter the repair function and thus contribute to the development of ROS-related diseases.

PCOS is one of the most common reproductive endocrine disorders, affecting 5–10% of women of reproductive age (14). PCOS is a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by clinical and/or biochemical androgen excess, polycystic ovaries and ovulatory dysfunction (15). While the etiology of PCOS remains to be elucidated, accumulating evidence suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation strengthens the development of metabolic aberration and ovarian dysfunction in this disorder (16,17). Circulating TNF-α levels are elevated in PCOS patients (18). TNF-α is mainly derived from mononuclear cells (MNCs), and hyperglycemia can further induce MNCs to produce TNF-α and ROS (18,19). TNF-α and ROS in turn exacerbate the inflammatory process, resulting in chronic inflammation in PCOS patients. The hOGG1 gene is associated with decreased insulin sensitivity (20), a common feature of certain PCOS patients. Therefore, we hypothesize that a link between the hOGG1 gene and PCOS may exist.

Materials and methods

Subjects

A total of 865 individuals, consisting of 425 PCOS patients and 440 non-PCOS control women, were involved in the present study. All the participants were of Han Chinese origin. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University, Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University (Nanjing, Jiangsu, China), and at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Anhui Medical University (Hefei, Anhui, China) between 2004 and 2013. The PCOS patients were diagnosed based on the 2003 Rotterdam Criteria (15). All the controls had normal ovulatory menstrual cycles and did not show hirsutism or other manifestations of hyperandrogenism. Serum hormone levels and clinical variables [including age and body mass index (BMI)] were measured as previously described (21). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing University and informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Polymorphism genotyping analysis in the hOGG1 gene

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes using an UltraPure™ Genome DNA kit (SBS Genetech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and stored at −80°C. A DNA fragment containing part of the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) and the full region of exon 1 was amplified with the primers: Forward, 5′-AGG AGG TGG AGG AAT TAA GT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGC TTC TCA GGC TCA GTC A-3′, as described previously (9,11). Amplification of DNA sequences, including Ser326Cys polymorphism in exon 7, was carried out with: Forward primer, 5′-GGA AGG TGC TTG GGG AAT-3′ and reverse primer, 5′-ACT GTC ACT AGT CTC ACC AG-3′. Polymorphism chain reaction (PCR) was run in a total volume of 25 µl containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 6 pmol of each primer, 2.5 µl short tandem repeat 10X buffer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 0.75 units of GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega). The PCR protocol was conducted as follows: Denaturing at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles consisting of 30 sec of denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec of annealing at 60°C for 5′-UTR or 58°C for exon 7, and 30 sec of extension at 72°C; and a final single extension of 10 min at 72°C. For 5′-UTR, the genotyping was carried out by direct sequencing on an ABI 3130 automated sequencer at Nanjing Springen Bio-Technique Corp. (Nanjing, China). Genotyping for the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism was performed by the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay. Briefly, a 200-base pair (bp) PCR product was digested at 37°C with Fnu4HI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) for 16 h resulting in a single 200-bp band for the homozygous Ser/Ser hOGG1 variant, a single 100-bp band for the homozygous Cys/Cys hOGG1 variant, and double bands of 200 and 100 bp for the heterozygous Ser/Cys hOGG1 variant. Digestion was visualized following electrophoresis on a 3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide. Finally, 100 DNA samples were randomly selected for direct sequence to validate Ser326Cys.

Serum hormone determination

Venous blood samples were collected in the early follicular phase (days 3–5) of the menstrual cycle for those who had menstrual cycles and at any time for those who were amenorrheic. Prior to sample collection, all participants went through a 12-h overnight fast. Serum estradiol (E2), testosterone (T), luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were determined by radioimmunoassay (Beijing North Institute of Biological Technology of China, Beijing, China and the CIS Company of France, Gif-sur-Yvette, France). The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <10% for all the assays.

Statistical analysis

Fisher's exact test or χ2 test was used when appropriate to detect the association between genotypic variants in the hOGG1 gene. The PCOS risks were determined by the odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Genotype frequencies for each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) were determined for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group. The results of serum hormone levels, age and BMI are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Genotypic distribution analysis between PCOS and control was carried out by Fisher's exact test. Biochemical steroid levels among different genotypes were compared by analysis of covariance to correct for age and BMI. All the statistical analysis was performed using the statistical program SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Clinical characteristics of PCOS and control subjects

Clinical variables and serum steroid hormone levels were compared between women with PCOS and controls (Table I). PCOS patients had significantly higher BMI, testosterone levels and LH/FSH ratios as compared with healthy control women.

Table I.

Clinical and endocrine characteristics of PCOS patients and controls.

Table I.

Clinical and endocrine characteristics of PCOS patients and controls.

PatientsTotal, nAge, yearsBMIa, kg/m2FSHa, IU/lLHa, IU/lLH/FSHaE2a, pg/mlTa, nmol/l
Control440 33.02±5.39 21.95±3.91 8.36±8.32   5.62±4.86 0.75±0.50 65.33±58.40 2.45±1.75
PCOS425 26.95±6.79 22.96±6.13 5.97±3.22 11.77±8.96 2.26±3.04   79.3±69.22   2.7±6.02

a P<0.05 between the PCOS and control groups. Data are mean ± standard deviation. BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; T, testosterone; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.

Distribution of the hOGG1 gene variants

Five variants were screened in a case-control study that included 425 PCOS patients and 440 age-matched controls by direct sequencing and/or RFLP (Fig. 1A and B). Four of the variants were SNP, namely, c.-18G>T, c.-23A>G, c. −53G>C and Ser326Cys. The genotypic distributions of the four SNPs were consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the control group. A rare variation, c.-45G>A, was only observed in the normal controls with an extremely low allele frequency (<1%), while another previously reported rare variation, c.-63G > C, was not detected in the Chinese population examined in the present study. Of note, the four closely adjacent variants did not appear to belong to an individual linkage disequilibrium block, as there were no combined variants in the whole population investigated.

No significant differences were detected in the genotype frequency or allele frequency in all five variations between patients and control (Table II). There were no differences in the clinical variables and hormone levels among the different genotypes in all the variants, except that the FSH level was elevated in the GC genotype (P=0.002) of c. −53G>C in PCOS patients (Tables IIIVII). Furthermore, the potential joint effect between the four rare variants and Ser326Cys was investigated to evaluate the risk of the combined variants in PCOS. However, no significant association was found in each individual allele (Table II) or genotype combinations (data not shown).

Table II.

Germline hOGG1 variations and genotype/allele frequencies in the case-control study.

Table II.

Germline hOGG1 variations and genotype/allele frequencies in the case-control study.

Total, n (%)

SNP sites Genotype/allelePCOS (n=425)Control (n=440) P-valueaOR (95% CI)b
c.-53G>CGC10 (2.4)5 (1.1)0.1992.096 (0.711–6.185)
GG415 (97.6)435 (98.9) 1
C10 (1.2)5 (0.6)0.2012.083 (0.709–6.121)
G840 (98.8)875 (99.4) 1
c.-45G>AGA0 (0.0)2 (0.4)0.500
GG425 (100.0)438 (99.6)
A0 (0.0)2 (0.2)0.500
G850 (100.0)878 (99.8)
c.-23A>GAG7 (1.6)14 (3.2)0.1850.510 (0.204–1.275)
AA418 (98.4)426 (96.8) 1
G7 (0.8)14 (1.6)0.1880.514 (0.206–1.279)
A843 (99.2)866 (98.4) 1
c.-18G>TGT13 (3.0)20 (4.5)0.2890.663 (0.325–1.350)
GG412 (97.0)420 (95.5) 1
T13 (1.5)20 (2.3)0.2940.668 (0.330–1.351)
G837 (98.5)860 (97.7) 1
Ser326CysGG156 (36.7)141 (32.0) 1.314 (0.878–1.966)
(C>G)CG205 (48.2)223 (50.7)0.3191.092 (0.744–1.601)
CC64 (15.1)76 (17.3) 1
G517 (60.8)505 (57.4)0.1461.153 (0.952–1.397)
C333 (39.2)375 (42.6) 1

a Data were analyzed for the frequencies of genotypes or alleles between cases and controls carried out by Fisher's exact test.

b OR (95% CI) were calculated as the wild genotype. SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table III.

Comparisons of variants at c.-53 G>C for women with or without PCOS in terms of anthropometric characteristics and serum hormone concentrations.

Table III.

Comparisons of variants at c.-53 G>C for women with or without PCOS in terms of anthropometric characteristics and serum hormone concentrations.

Control PCOS


GenotypesGGGCP-valueGGGCP-value
Age, years 32.99±5.35 36.67±10.400.240 26.89±6.73 29.33±9.350.384
BMI, kg/m2 21.95±3.92 21.54±1.460.856 22.96±6.17 22.97±4.830.994
FSH, IU/l 8.33±8.33 11.75±7.980.480 5.86±2.77 10.36±11.510.002a
LH, IU/l 5.63±4.88 4.97±1.790.815 11.72±9.04 14.08±4.660.562
LH/FSH 0.75±0.50 0.48±0.130.356 2.26±3.07 2.17±0.990.947
T, nmol/l 2.46±1.74 0.24±00.207 2.70±6.09 2.49±1.160.938
E2, pg/ml 65.68±58.51 26.83±27.250.252 79.18±69.64 84.35±55.600.869

a P<0.05. Statistical analyses were carried out by analysis of covariance to correct for age and BMI. Data are mean ± standard deviation. BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; T, testosterone.

Table VII.

Comparisons of Ser326Cys (C>G) for women with or without PCOS in terms of anthropometric characteristics and serum hormone concentrations.

Table VII.

Comparisons of Ser326Cys (C>G) for women with or without PCOS in terms of anthropometric characteristics and serum hormone concentrations.

Control PCOS


GenotypesCCCGGGP-valueCCCGGGP-value
Age, years 31.48±2.65 33.12±5.03 35.88±5.640.675 25.95±8.01 28.13±4.03 30.88±6.740.468
BMI, kg/m2 21.46±3.74 21.99±2.33 21.77±3.740.897 22.56±5.66 23.43±4.51 22.78±3.780.649
FSH, IU/l 7.79±7.49 8.68±2.94 8.29±4.470.469 5.78±4.23 6.13±4.46 5.89±2.230.657
LH, IU/l 5.67±4.74 5.74±4.04 4.96±3.740.658 11.59±6.99 12.84±9.00 8.66±6.740.371
LH/FSH 0.78±0.16 0.75±0.69 0.74±0.230.865 2.31±1.92 2.27±1.03 1.76±1.890.582
T, nmol/l 2.49±1.32 2.32±0.19 2.45±1.960.618 2.80±1.64 2.44±1.96 2.68±1.870.654
E2, pg/ml 59.90±41.59 65.60±48.22 66.81±48.730.413 67.16±48.37 77.80±58.11 81.49±64.770.200

[i] Statistical analyses were carried out by analysis of covariance to correct for age and BMI. Data are mean ± standard deviation. BMI, body mass index; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol; T testosterone.

Discussion

PCOS is a complex endocrine disease with no clear etiology. Accumulating evidence suggests that genetic and environmental factors contribute to its occurrence and development (22). Familial clustering of PCOS or PCOS-related metabolic symptoms indicates a genetic origin (23,24), although no consensus of the inheritance mode has been reached. To date, significant attention has been focused on the genes involved in the androgen biosynthetic pathways (CYP11, CYP17 and CYP19) and insulin-related pathways (INS and INSR). However, other genes that are crucial in maintaining normal metabolic functions, such as insulin sensitivity preservation may show a link with this metabolic disease. The hOGG1 gene is critical in BER. Several polymorphisms in hOGG1 have been identified as associated with insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2MD). The underlying role of ROS-induced oxidative stress in PCOS together with the correlation between ROS and the BER system provide us with a new insight into the possible causes of PCOS. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that functional polymorphisms in the hOGG1 gene in Chinese PCOS patients have been investigated.

The structure and functions of hOGG1 have been well studied and several of its polymorphisms have been identified. Specifically, certain polymorphisms in hOGG1 that are associated with insulin sensitivity or T2MD have been reported, indicating the functional involvement of hOGG1 in the maintenance of normal glucose metabolism (9,20,25). Previous studies have reported an association between oxidative stress and insulin resistance not only in the context of diabetes, but also in nondiabetic individuals and in those with metabolic syndromes (2628). Consequently, increased generation of ROS in response to oxidative stress in metabolic syndromes prompted other investigators to focus on genomic instability and DNA damage that are associated with hOGG1.

The present study investigated four rare SNPs in 5′-UTR and a common SNP (Ser326Cys) in exon 7 of the hOGG1 gene in a case-control study of PCOS. The 5′-UTR region is known to modulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by influencing mRNA stability and translational efficiency medicated by transcription factors (TF) (29,30). The inactivation or induction of the corresponding TF can modulate the expression of the hOGG1 gene, thus influencing the activity of the protein (31,32). Previous studies revealed that certain types of functional variants in the 5′-UTR of the hOGG1 gene are capable of increasing the risks of diseases, including cancer (9,11,33,34). The present finding suggests that there was no significant correlation between the variants in hOGG1 and the PCOS risk. Although the FSH level was elevated in the GC genotype of c. −53G>C in PCOS patients, it is difficult to provide any reasonable explanation for this phenomenon. The polymorphism Ser326Cys in the hOGG1 gene is shown to be associated with OGG1 activity in in vitro and in vivo studies, and it is suggested that the 326Cys allele may pose a higher risk of 8-oxoG formation in DNA (35,36). The associations between the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and various diseases have been extensively investigated. However, conflicted results, even in the same disease, have been reported (37,38). The present study does not support an association of this polymorphism with PCOS susceptibility. Given the low allele frequency of the variants in 5′-UTR of hOGG1, further studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm these findings.

In conclusion, hOGG1 is not an independent risk factor for PCOS development, and no putative linkage to the syndrome could be established.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the members who participated in the present study. This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81170541) and the Natural Basic Research Program of China (no. 973 program 2010CB 945103).

References

1 

Ghosh J and Myers CE: Inhibition of arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase triggers massive apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:13182–13187. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Yin GY, Yin YF and He XF: Effect of zhuchun pill on immunity and endocrine function of elderly with kidney-yang deficiency. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 15:601–603. 1995.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

3 

Stadtman ER and Berlett BS: Reactive oxygen-mediated protein oxidation in aging and disease. Drug Metab Rev. 30:225–243. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Chopra S and Wallace HM: Induction of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase in human cancer cells in response to increased production of reactive oxygen species. Biochem Pharmacol. 55:1119–1123. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wells PG, Kim PM, Laposa RR, Nicol CJ, Parman T and Winn LM: Oxidative damage in chemical teratogenesis. Mutat Res. 396:65–78. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Shibutani S, Takeshita M and Grollman AP: Insertion of specific bases during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base 8-oxodG. Nature. 349:431–434. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Krokan HE, Nilsen H, Skorpen F, Otterlei M and Slupphaug G: Base excision repair of DNA in mammalian cells. FEBS Lett. 476:73–77. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

David SS, O'Shea VL and Kundu S: Base-excision repair of oxidative DNA damage. Nature. 447:941–950. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Sun C, Liu X, Zhang H, Guo W, Cai Z, Chen H, Zhang K, Zhu D and Wang Y: Functional polymorphism of hOGG1 gene is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese population. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 325:128–134. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kohno T, Shinmura K, Tosaka M, Tani M, Kim SR, Sugimura H, Nohmi T, Kasai H and Yokota J: Genetic polymorphisms and alternative splicing of the hOGG1 gene, that is involved in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine in damaged DNA. Oncogene. 16:3219–3225. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Chen X, Wang J, Guo W, Liu X, Sun C, Cai Z, Fan Y and Wang Y: Two functional variations in 5′-UTR of hoGG1 gene associated with the risk of breast cancer in Chinese. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 127:795–803. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Lum-Jones A, Seifried A and Wilkens LR: Association of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism with lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 11:409–412. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Coppedè F, Migheli F, Ceravolo R, Bregant E, Rocchi A, Petrozzi L, Unti E, Lonigro R, Siciliano G and Migliore L: The hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and Huntington's disease. Toxicology. 278:199–203. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ehrmann DA: Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 352:1223–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group: Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 19:41–47. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Kelly CC, Lyall H, Petrie JR, Gould GW, Connell JM and Sattar N: Low grade chronic inflammation in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86:2453–2455. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Benson S, Janssen OE, Hahn S, Tan S, Dietz T, Mann K, Pleger K, Schedlowski M, Arck PC and Elsenbruch S: Obesity, depression, and chronic low-grade inflammation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Brain Behav Immun. 22:177–184. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Gonzalez F, Thusu K, Abdel-Rahman E, Prabhala A, Tomani M and Dandona P: Elevated serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha in normal-weight women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 48:437–441. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

González F, Minium J, Rote NS and Kirwan JP: Hyperglycemia alters tumor necrosis factor-alpha release from mononuclear cells in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 90:5336–5342. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wang CL, Hsieh MC, Hsin SC, Lin HY, Lin KD, Lo CS, Chen ZH and Shin SJ: The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism is associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in subjects with normal glucose tolerance. J Hum Genet. 51:124–128. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Xia Y, Che Y, Zhang X, Zhang C, Cao Y, Wang W, Xu P, Wu X, Yi L, Gao Q, et al: Polymorphic CAG repeat in the androgen receptor gene in polycystic ovary syndrome patients. Mol Med Rep. 5:1330–1334. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G and Azziz R: Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 7:219–231. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Lunde O, Magnus P, Sandvik L and Høglo S: Familial clustering in the polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 28:23–30. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Hague WM, Adams J, Reeders ST, Peto TE and Jacobs HS: Familial polycystic ovaries: A genetic disease? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 29:593–605. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Daimon M, Oizumi T, Toriyama S, Karasawa S, Jimbu Y, Wada K, Kameda W, Susa S, Muramatsu M, Kubota I, et al: Association of the Ser326Cys polymorphism in the OGG1 gene with type 2 DM. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 386:26–29. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Lee KU: Oxidative stress markers in Korean subjects with insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 54(Suppl 2): S29–S33. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Sentí M, Tomás M, Fitó M, Weinbrenner T, Covas MI, Sala J, Masiá R and Marrugat J: Antioxidant paraoxonase 1 activity in the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 88:5422–5426. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

González F, Rote NS, Minium J and Kirwan JP: Reactive oxygen species-induced oxidative stress in the development of insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 91:336–340. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

van der Velden AW and Thomas AA: The role of the 5′ untranslated region of an mRNA in translation regulation during development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 31:87–106. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Bashirullah A, Cooperstock RL and Lipshitz HD: Spatial and temporal control of RNA stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:7025–7028. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Lee MR, Kim SH, Cho HJ, Lee KY, Moon AR, Jeong HG, Lee JS, Hyun JW, Chung MH and You HJ: Transcription factors NF-YA regulate the induction of human OGG1 following DNA-alkylating agent methylmethane sulfonate (MMS) treatment. J Biol Chem. 279:9857–9866. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Youn CK, Kim SH, Lee DY, Song SH, Chang IY, Hyun JW, Chung MH and You HJ: Cadmium down-regulates human OGG1 through suppression of Sp1 activity. J Biol Chem. 280:25185–25195. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Liu X, Xiao N, Guo W, Wu Y, Cai Z, He Q, Zhang L, Chen X, Sun C, Wang J, et al: The hOGG1 gene 5′-UTR variant c.-53G>C contributes to the risk of gastric cancer but not colorectal cancer in the Chinese population: The functional variation of hOGG1 for gastric cancer risk. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 137:1477–1485. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Kim JC, Ka IH, Lee YM, Koo KH, Kim HC, Yu CS, Jang SJ, Kim YS, Lee HI and Lee KH: MYH, OGG1, MTH1, and APC alterations involved in the colorectal tumorigenesis of Korean patients with multiple adenomas. Virchows Arch. 450:311–319. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Yamane A, Kohno T, Ito K, Sunaga N, Aoki K, Yoshimura K, Murakami H, Nojima Y and Yokota J: Differential ability of polymorphic OGG1 proteins to suppress mutagenesis induced by 8-hydroxyguanine in human cell in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 25:1689–1694. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Hill JW and Evans MK: Dimerization and opposite base-dependent catalytic impairment of polymorphic S326C OGG1 glycosylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:1620–1632. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Xie H, Xia K, Rong H and Chen X: Genetic polymorphism in hOGG1 is associated with triple-negative breast cancer risk in Chinese Han women. Breast. 22:707–712. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Ding DP, Zhang Y and He XF: Lack of association between hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility in European population. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129:1023–1026. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2016
Volume 4 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xia Y, Wang W, Wang L, Shen S, Cao Y, Yi L, Gao Q and Wang Y: hOGG1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Biomed Rep 4: 421-426, 2016.
APA
Xia, Y., Wang, W., Wang, L., Shen, S., Cao, Y., Yi, L. ... Wang, Y. (2016). hOGG1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome. Biomedical Reports, 4, 421-426. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.600
MLA
Xia, Y., Wang, W., Wang, L., Shen, S., Cao, Y., Yi, L., Gao, Q., Wang, Y."hOGG1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome". Biomedical Reports 4.4 (2016): 421-426.
Chicago
Xia, Y., Wang, W., Wang, L., Shen, S., Cao, Y., Yi, L., Gao, Q., Wang, Y."hOGG1 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to polycystic ovary syndrome". Biomedical Reports 4, no. 4 (2016): 421-426. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.600