Change ratio of hemoglobin has predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

  • Authors:
    • Minoru Tomizawa
    • Fuminobu Shinozaki
    • Rumiko Hasegawa
    • Yoshinori Shirai
    • Yasufumi Motoyoshi
    • Takao Sugiyama
    • Shigenori Yamamoto
    • Naoki Ishige
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 8, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.753
  • Pages: 479-482
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study aimed to identify novel predictors of upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding by assessing change ratios of blood test variables. Records of 1,023 patients (431 men and 592 women) who underwent endoscopy between October 2014 and September 2015 at the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Japan) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose blood test variables for the time‑point of endoscopy and three months previously were available were enrolled and subsequently categorized into a group with and another one without upper GI bleeding (n=32 and 84, respectively), and the respective change ratios were calculated for each group. One‑way analysis of variance revealed that in patients with upper GI bleeding, change ratios of white blood cell count and alkaline phosphatase were significantly higher than those in patients without, while change ratios of hemoglobin (Hb), total protein and albumin were significantly reduced. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the change ratio of Hb was significantly correlated with upper GI bleeding. Receiver‑operator characteristic analysis revealed that an 18.7% reduction of Hb was the threshold value for the prediction of upper GI bleeding. In conclusion, the present study revealed that a ≥18.7% reduction in Hb over three months has predictive value for upper GI bleeding.

Introduction

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding occurs proximal to the Treitz ligament and may be caused by gastric or duodenal ulcers or gastric cancer (1). The mortality rate of patients with upper GI bleeding ranges from 3.5 to 7.4% (2,3). Upper GI bleeding is diagnosed by endoscopy (4). Upper GI bleeding is treated with endoscopy, such as clipping and bipolar electrocoagulation (4) However, for patients for whom endoscopic treatment fails, interventional radiology is applied (5,6). The mortality rate rises to 40% when patients become hemodynamically unstable (7); therefore, it is important to predict upper GI bleeding prior to this.

The Glasgow Batchford Scores, Modified Early Waning Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall scores are useful for stratification of patients with regard to unstable state, requirement of transfusion and hospitalization (8,9). These scoring systems are useful for triage and management of upper GI bleeding (10). Analyses of on data from emergency departments or intensive care units identified malignancy, hypotension on admission, low Glasgow coma scale and kidney dysfunction as predictors of poor outcome (11). It would be beneficial to diagnose upper GI bleeding in patients prior to presentation at the emergency department. Moreover, certain patients with upper GI bleeding do not exhibit any symptoms (12). Therefore, it is desirable to diagnose upper GI bleeding prior to the advancement of affected patients to the unstable state.

As blood test variables are easy to obtain and reliable, the present study investigated the predictive value of their changes with regard to upper GI bleeding. The change ratios of blood test variables at the time-point of endoscopy and 3 months previously were evaluated.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Ethics Committee of the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital approved the present study, which was not assigned as a clinical trial because it was based on daily clinical practice. Patient records were anonymized and retrospectively analyzed. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients who were subjected to endoscopy.

Patients

Between October 2014 and September 2015, a total of 1,023 patients were subjected to endoscopy at the National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital (Yotsukaido, Japan). Endoscopy was indicated due to anemia, tarry stool or abdominal pain, or was performed for screening purposes (Table I). From these subjects, patients whose blood test variables at the time-point of endoscopy and three months previously were available were enrolled in the present study. For these patients, change ratios of blood test variables between these two time-points were evaluated. The group with upper GI bleeding (n=32) comprised 15 males and 17 females (mean age, 69.3±12.9), while the group without upper GI bleeding (n=84) comprised 37 males and 47 females (mean age, 69.0±13.9). At three months prior to endoscopy, the presence of upper GI bleeding was not known for any of the patients. Colonoscopy was not performed for patients who were negative for bleeding on endoscopy.

Table I.

Indications for assessment of upper GI bleeding by endoscopy.

Table I.

Indications for assessment of upper GI bleeding by endoscopy.

SymptomAll patients (n)Patients with bleeding/no bleeding, n (%)
Anemia     9  5/4 (15.6/4.8)
Hematemesis     5  4/1 (12.5/1.2)
Tarry stool     8  7/1 (21.9/1.2)
Othersa  9416/78 (50/92.8)
Total11632/84 (100/100)

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-br-0-0-753'] } Bleeding was diagnosed by endoscopy and in positive patients, colonoscopy was performed within one month after endoscopy.

a Included patients undergoing screening (n=47, 49.5%).

Endoscopy

The devices GIF-N260H, GIF-XP260NS, GIF-PfG260, GIF-XQ260 and GIF-Q260 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) were used for endoscopy. Bleeding from a gastric or duodenal ulcer was restricted to a spurting vessel, an oozing vessel, a visible vessel or a clot, according to the Forrest classification system (13). In Table II the diagnoses of the patients are listed.

Table II.

Causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Table II.

Causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

CauseNo. of patients
Gastric ulcer17
Gastric cancer  4
Hemorrhagic gastritis  4
Reflux esophagitis  3
Duodenal ulcer  2
Acute gastric mucosal lesion  1
Esophageal varices  1
Total32
Blood test variables

The following blood test variables were analyzed: White blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count, C-reactive protein, total protein (TP), albumin (Alb), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, lactate dehydrogenase, uric acid, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c. Change ratios were calculated using the following equation: (result at 3 months prior to endoscopy - result on the date of endoscopy)/result at 3 months prior to endoscopy.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance was applied to compare change ratios between patients with and without upper GI bleeding. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify blood test variables whose change ratios were significantly associated with upper GI bleeding. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine threshold values for the prediction of upper GI bleeding. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. JMP 10.0.2 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to perform statistical analyses.

Results

To identify blood test parameters whose changes were significantly associated with upper GI bleeding, change ratios were compared between patients without or with upper GI bleeding using one-way analysis of variance (Table III). The change ratios of WBC (P=0.05) and ALT (P=0.037) in patients with upper GI bleeding were higher were higher than in patients without bleeding. Furthermore, the change ratios of Hb (P<0.001), TP (P<0.001) and Alb (P=0.01) in patients with upper GI bleeding were lower that in those without bleeding. These results suggested that the change ratios of WBC, Hb, TP, Alb and ALT were significantly associated with upper GI bleeding.

Table III.

Comparison of change ratios of blood test variables between patients with and without upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Table III.

Comparison of change ratios of blood test variables between patients with and without upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Characteristic/parameter(−)(+)P-value
Gender (male/female), n37/4715/17
Mean age, years69.0±13.969.3±12.9   0.983
WBC1.02±0.291.23±0.64   0.050
Hb0.97±0.150.75±0.23<0.001
Plt2.69±12.81.32±0.52   0.663
CRP2.62±3.6915.5±5.95   0.074
TP0.99±0.100.84±0.16<0.001
Alb0.97±0.120.81±0.21   0.010
ALP1.02±0.200.74±0.19   0.006
AST1.13±0.681.74±1.92   0.056
ALT1.14±0.511.94±2.72   0.037
γ-GTP1.20±0.732.55±4.25   0.134
LDH1.02±0.431.01±0.35   0.946
UA0.98±0.131.04±0.37   0.420
BUN0.96±0.331.02±0.73   0.739
TG0.94±0.501.61±1.00   0.051
HDL1.08±0.460.90±0.12   0.443
LDL1.02±0.320.93±0.22   0.519
BG0.92±0.171.40±1.12   0.056
HbA1c0.94±0.111.03±0.11   0.345

[i] WBC, white blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; Plt, platelets; CRP, C-reactive protein; TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; γ-GTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; UA, uric acid; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; TG, triglyceride; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BG, blood glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify blood test variables with change ratios that were strongly associated with upper GI bleeding (Table IV). The change ratio of Hb was determined to be significantly associated with upper GI bleeding (P=0.017); whereas no significant correlation was identified for the change ratios of the remaining blood test variables with P-values close to 1. These results suggested that the change ratio of Hb was significantly correlated with upper GI bleeding.

Table IV.

Results of the logistic regression analysis.

Table IV.

Results of the logistic regression analysis.

ParameterOdds ratioP-value
WBC1.056xe80.999
Hb   8.13xe230.017
TP     7.74xe-140.999
Alb4.36xe90.999
ALP     9.77xe-110.999

[i] e, Napier's constant of natural logarithm (2.71828); WBC, white blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

ROC analysis was performed to determine the threshold values of change ratios for the prediction of upper GI bleeding (Fig. 1). A threshold value was determined as a value that was in contact with the line with an increment of 45° (Fig. 1, solid straight line) and had the greatest distance from the reference line (Fig. 1, broken line). Variables obtained via ROC analysis are presented in Table V. The threshold value of the change ratio of Hb was 0.813, which was converted into the threshold of the change rate using the following formula: (1.000–0.813) × 100%=18.7%. Therefore, a 18.7% reduction of Hb over three months was the threshold value for the prediction of upper GI bleeding.

Table V.

Variables with receiver-operator characteristics.

Table V.

Variables with receiver-operator characteristics.

ParameterArea under curveThreshold valueSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
WBC0.6341.04772.264.6
Hb0.7800.81361.195.4
TP0.7800.95280.073.2
Alb0.7320.77155.696.6
ALP0.8540.75966.795.8

[i] Values are stated as change ratios. WBC, white blood cell count; Hb, hemoglobin; TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

Discussion

To date, only a limited number of studies have assessed the association of change ratios of blood test variables with upper GI bleeding. It has been previously demonstrated that the change ratio of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score is useful for the prediction of bleeding from esophageal varices (14); however, this model is applicable to patients with liver cirrhosis only and was therefore not used in the present study.

Decreased Hb has been previously reported to be associated with upper GI bleeding (15). However, a limitation with regard to evaluation of Hb is that results differ between first-time and repeated sampling (16). Hb below the normal range indicates upper GI bleeding. The present study further assessed the predictive value of the change ratio of blood parameters with regard to upper GI bleeding. In a previous study by our group, a 21.3% reduction of Hb within 3 months was determined to be the threshold value for the prediction of upper GI bleeding (17). In line with this, an 18.7% reduction was determined to be the threshold value for the prediction of upper GI bleeding in the present study. Although the patient cohorts were totally different between the two studies, the threshold was ~20% in each, suggesting that a change ratio of Hb of ~20% or above is of predictive value regarding upper GI bleeding.

A limitation of the present study was the difficulty in differentiating between upper and lower GI bleeding, which may have affected the assessment of the association of the change ratio of Hb with upper GI bleeding (18). To differentiate between upper and lower GI bleeding, an elevated BUN value may be useful (19), as higher BUN indicates severe upper GI bleeding (20). In the present study, BUN was not significantly different between patients with or without upper GI bleeding. This result may suggest that upper GI bleeding was not very severe in the patients.

In conclusion, an 18.7% reduction of Hb over three months was shown to be associated with upper GI bleeding in the present study. These findings suggested that patients with this change ratio of Hb are at risk of upper GI bleeding. It is recommended that patients are subjected to endoscopic examination if presenting with symptoms of upper GI bleeding and Hb levels lowered by ≥20%.

References

1 

Theocharis GJ, Thomopoulos KC, Sakellaropoulos G, Katsakoulis E and Nikolopoulou V: Changing trends in the epidemiology and clinical outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a defined geographical area in Greece. J Clin Gastroenterol. 42:128–133. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Hearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, Travis SP, Murphy MF and Palmer KR: Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: Patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 60:1327–1335. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Leontiadis GI, Molloy-Bland M, Moayyedi P and Howden CW: Effect of comorbidity on mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 108:331–345; quiz 346. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kim SY, Hyun JJ, Jung SW and Lee SW: Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Endosc. 45:220–223. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Wilkins T, Khan N, Nabh A and Schade RR: Diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am Fam Physician. 85:469–476. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Katano T, Mizoshita T, Senoo K, Sobue S, Takada H, Sakamoto T, Mochiduki H, Ozeki T, Kato A, Matsunami K, et al: The efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization as the first-choice treatment after failure of endoscopic hemostasis and endoscopic treatment resistance factors. Dig Endosc. 24:364–369. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Walsh RM, Anain P, Geisinger M, Vogt D, Mayes J, Grundfest-Broniatowski S and Henderson JM: Role of angiography and embolization for massive gastroduodenal hemorrhage. J Gastrointest Surg. 3:61–65; discussion 66. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Bozkurt S, Köse A, Arslan ED, Erdoğan S, Üçbilek E, Çevik İ, Ayrık C and Sezgin O: Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 23:1092015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Thanapirom K, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R, Thungsuk R, Noophun P, Wongjitrat C, Luangjaru S, Vedkijkul P, Lertkupinit C, Poonsab S, et al: Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 31:761–767. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Rahman SH, Larvin M, McMahon MJ and Thompson D: Clinical presentation and delayed treatment of cholangitis in older people. Dig Dis Sci. 50:2207–2210. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Kaya E, Karaca MA, Aldemir D and Ozmen MM: Predictors of poor outcome in gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency department. World J Gastroenterol. 22:4219–4225. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Bini EJ, Rajapaksa RC, Valdes MT and Weinshel EH: Is upper gastrointestinal endoscopy indicated in asymptomatic patients with a positive fecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy? Am J Med. 106:613–618. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Forrest JA, Finlayson ND and Shearman DJ: Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. Lancet. 2:394–397. 1974. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Xu XD, Dai JJ, Qian JQ, Pin X and Wang WJ: New index to predict esophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. World J Gastroenterol. 20:6989–6994. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, Kurien M, Rotondano G, Hucl T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Marmo R, et al: Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 47:a1–a46. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

McFarlane A, Aslan B, Raby A, Bourner G and Padmore R: Critical values in hematology. Int J Lab Hematol. 37:36–43. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Togawa A, Shirai Y, Ichiki N, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Sueishi M: Reduced hemoglobin and increased C-reactive protein are associated with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 20:1311–1317. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chong V, Hill AG and MacCormick AD: Accurate triage of lower gastrointestinal bleed (LGIB) - A cohort study. Int J Surg. 25:19–23. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Shirai Y, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Ishige N: Laboratory test variables useful for distinguishing upper from lower gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 21:6246–6251. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Shirai Y, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Ishige N: Patient characteristics with high or low blood urea nitrogen in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastroenterol. 21:7500–7505. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

October-2016
Volume 5 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 2049-9434
Online ISSN:2049-9442

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Shirai Y, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S and Ishige N: Change ratio of hemoglobin has predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Biomed Rep 5: 479-482, 2016.
APA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T. ... Ishige, N. (2016). Change ratio of hemoglobin has predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Biomedical Reports, 5, 479-482. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.753
MLA
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Ishige, N."Change ratio of hemoglobin has predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding". Biomedical Reports 5.4 (2016): 479-482.
Chicago
Tomizawa, M., Shinozaki, F., Hasegawa, R., Shirai, Y., Motoyoshi, Y., Sugiyama, T., Yamamoto, S., Ishige, N."Change ratio of hemoglobin has predictive value for upper gastrointestinal bleeding". Biomedical Reports 5, no. 4 (2016): 479-482. https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2016.753