Association between promoter methylation and gene expression of CGB3 and NOP56 in HPV‑infected cervical cancer cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 3, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2021.1484
- Article Number: 1
-
Copyright: © Singh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequent cancer amongst women worldwide, resulting in ~570,000 new casesin 2018, 90% of the 311,000 women with cervical cancer died (1). Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection and has been recognized as an important risk factor for cervical cancer (2,3). There are >100 types of HPVs, which are categorized into low- and high-risk HPV (4-7). High-risk HPVs include HPV16 and HPV18 amongst several others, and are the causative agents in ≥90% of cervical cancer cases, whilst also being linked to >50% of other types of anogenital cancer (7-9). High-risk HPV (16 and 18)-associated cervical cancer is driven by two major viral oncoproteins, E6 and E7, which are associated with the tumor suppressor genes p53 and retinoblastoma 1, respectively, degrading them (10-15). HPV16 E6 was found to upregulate DNA methyltransferase I (DNMT1) expression and suppress p53 in cells (16-19). Moreover, previous studies have found that E7 displayed an interaction with DNMT1, which led to aberrant methylation of the cellular genome, resulting in silencing of tumor suppressor genes (20-23).
Several groups of researchers have studied the association between HPV infection and promoter methylation. Chalertpet et al (24) reported that HPV16 E7 can induce promoter methylation in CCNA1. However, Yanatatsaneejit et al (25) in 2020 demonstrated that both HPV E6 and E7 induced promoter methylation in death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) and cell adhesion molecule 1 (CADM1), respectively. Moreover, their study indicated that the E7 protein can bind to the promoter region of CADM1, and chromatin immunoprecipitation indicated that it may bind to DNMT1 through the same mechanism as CCNA1 (25). Na Rangsee et al (26), using readings from mass spectrometry followed by STRING database protein network analysis, showed that E7 possibly formed a complex with a set of transcription factors, including SP1, which links with the Yin yang 1 (YY1) transcription factor contributing to the E7 mediated hypermethylation of the genes. This highlighted the possibility of E7 combining with DNMT1 through a transcription factor to the promoter region of the CCNA1 gene, resulting in promoter methylation. Thus, studying other tumor suppressor genes that share the same sequence as the CCNA1 promoter where HPV16 E7 can bind may highlight novel potential targets. In order to investigate this possibility, bioinformatics analysis was performed and the results revealed that YY1 was found to bind to the promoter region of CCNA1. Here, other genes which shared the same YY1 binding site as CCNA1 promoter were explored. CGB3 and NOP56 were selected to investigate the induction of promoter methylation by HPV16 E7.
The CGB3 gene plays critical roles in increased expression of the CGB subunit in ovarian cancer through demethylation of the CGB promoter (27) and malignant transformation of non-trophoblastic cells (28,29). The NOP56 gene is involved in several oncogenic roles in more than five types of cancers (30); however, there is no evidence linking it to cervical cancer, to the best of our knowledge. These findings lead to the investigation of the role of HPV16 E7 in cervical cancer progression through promoter methylation of these two genes.
As methylation does not alter DNA sequences, previous studies have focused on using inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, including 5'-Azacytidine (5-aza), which can potentially be used as anticancer agents (31-33). Aberrant DNA methylation is a biochemical process that can be reversed using demethylating agents (34). 5-aza was the first DNA methyltransferase inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use as a chemotherapeutic against myelodysplastic syndrome, a heterogeneous bone marrow disorder (35). 5-aza covalently binds to DNMT leading to a reduction in its DNA methyltransferase activity (32). This results in the loss of methylation in specific gene regions and activates the expression of the associated genes (36-38). Moreover, several studies have reported that the association between DNA methylation and repression of gene expression can lead to cancer progression (39-41). Therefore, re-expression of methylated genes in cervical cancer cell lines following treatment with a demethylating agent, such as 5-aza, should be further investigated to assess the effect of inhibiting the methylation rate and whether it can increase the expression of tumor suppressor genes (31,42).
The present study investigated whether HPV16 E7 could induce promoter methylation and decrease the expression of CGB3 and NOP56. The study further assessed the effects of 5-aza treatment on promoter methylation and gene expression in cervical cancer C33A and SiHa cell lines to demonstrate the association between gene methylation and the regulation of tumor gene expression. This study may serve as an alternative strategy of drug therapy for patients with cervical cancer with aberrant gene promoter methylation (42).
Materials and methods
Bioinformatics analysis
PROMO version 8.3 from the TRANSFAC database (alggen.lsi.upc.es) was used to select the genes of interest containing YY1 binding sites with CCNA1 (43,44). JASPAR database (jaspar.genereg.net) was used to separately analyze the YY1 binding site sequences in the selected genes with reference to the CCNA1 gene (45).
Cell lines and culture
Human cervical carcinoma cell lines [SiHa (HPV type 16) and C33A (HPV-)] were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Cells were cultured in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator.
Transfection
For HPV 16 E7 overexpression, 3x105 cells/ml C33A cells were seeded into a 6-well plate and incubated overnight at 37˚C. Subsequently, cells were transfected with 2 µg HPV 16 E7 plasmid (E7; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and pcDNA 3.1/myc-HIS empty vector (PC; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using TurboFect reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A 72 h post-transfection, DNA and RNA were extracted from each sample to assess promoter methylation and gene expression, respectively, using specific primers for each gene.
5-aza treatment
To evaluate gene methylation and expression, cells were treated with 5-aza (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Briefly, SiHa and C33A cells (3x105 cells/ml) were seeded 1 day before 5-aza treatment. The following day fresh DMEM containing 5-aza (SiHa, 0, 20, 30 and 40 µM; C33A, 0, 3,5 and 7 µM) was added to the cells for 5 consecutive days, being replaced every 24 h until analysis (24).
Isolation of DNA
DNA was extracted from SiHa and C33A cells using 10% SDS (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), lysis buffer II (0.75 M NaCl and 0.024 M EDTA at pH 8) and 20 mg/ml proteinase K (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), digested by incubating at 50˚C overnight. Subsequently, phenol/chloroform extraction and 100% ethanol precipitation were performed. DNA was air-dried and resuspended in dH2O (46). DNA concentration was determined using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Sodium bisulfite treatment and methylation-specific PCR (MSP)
DNA (750 ng) for each sample was subjected to bisulfite treatment using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Zymo Research Corp.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Eluted DNA was used to perform MSP using methylated and unmethylated specific primers (Table I). The annealing temperature for CGB3 was 54˚C and for NOP56 it was 52˚C. The thermocycling conditions were 95˚C for 15 min; followed by 27 cycles of 95˚C for 45 sec, the respective annealing temperature for 45 sec and 72˚C for 45 sec; with a final extension step of 72˚C for 7 min. Subsequently, 10 µl PCR product was observed by gel electrophoresis using an 8% acrylamide gel and stained with SYBR reagent (Lonza Group, Ltd.). The methylated and unmethylated band intensities of each sample were visualized and measured using a Storm 840 (Amersham Biosciences) and ImageJ version 2 (National Institute of Health). The EpiTect control DNA set (Qiagen GmbH) contained positive controls for methylation and unmethylation. The experiments were performed in triplicate.
Table IPrimer sequences, amplicon sizes, annealing temperature and conditions for methylation-specific PCR. |
Preparation of RNA and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Subsequently, total RNA (1 µg) from each sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the RevertAid first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
PCR
PCR was performed to assess the expression of each gene in SiHa and C33A cells using specific forward and reverse primers for CGB3 expression in HPV 16 E7 transfected cell. The PCR mixture contained 10X PCR buffer (Qiagen GmbH), 0.2 mM dNTPs (New England BioLabs, Inc.), 0.3 µM forward and reverse primer (Table I) and 1 U HotStartaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen GmbH). GAPDH was used as an internal control (Table II). PCR products (10 µl) were subjected to electrophoresis on an 8% acrylamide gel and stained with SYBR. The experiment was performed in triplicate.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
CGB3 and NOP56 mRNA expression in 5-aza-treated, and HPV 16 E7 and NOP56 gene expression levels in HPV 16 E7 transfected cells were determined by qPCR using a 7500-fast qPCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and Power SYBR-Green PCR MasterMix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The qPCR was performed using specific primers (Table II), with GAPDH as the reference gene. The thermocycling condition were: 95˚C for 10 min; followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 15 sec, 56˚C for 30 sec and 72˚C for 45 sec. The mRNA expression levels were quantified using the 2-IICq method (47).
Statistical analysis
To assess gene promoter methylation and expression levels in 5-aza-treated cells, a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett's post hoc test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). P≤0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Student's t-tests (unpaired) was used to compare CGB3 and NOP56 expression and methylation in SiHa and C33A cells, respectively, as well as expression and methylation of CGB3 and NOP56 in the HPV 16 E7- and PC-transfected cells.
Results
Bioinformatics analysis
YY1 was found to be the binding to the promoter of CCNA1, CGB3 and NOP56 based on PROMO analysis (Fig. 1). Moreover, the results from JASPAR demonstrated that the binding sequence of YY1 in the CCNA1 gene shared 80% similarity in sequence, GCCATG and TCCATG (Fig. 2A), to that present in CGB3 GCCATC denoted by * in (Fig. 2B) and in NOP56 TCCATC denoted by ** in (Fig. 2C), respectively. Thus, both genes were selected for further analysis.
Gene expression and methylation in HPV+/- cervical cancer cell lines
To assess the expression of CGB3 and NOP56 genes, PCR was performed in SiHa (HPV+) and C33A (HPV-) cancer cell lines. The results showed that both CGB3 and NOP56 exhibited lower expression in SiHa cells (26.74 and 38.42%, respectively) compared with that observed in C33A cells (73.26 and 44.5%), respectively (Fig. 3A and C). GAPDH was used for CGB3 gene and GAPDH1 primer was used for NOP56 gene normalization in SiHa and C33A cells. The bar graphs shows the mean ± standard error of the mean of CGB3 (P=0.001; Fig. 3B) and NOP56 expression (P=0.004; Fig. 3D).
Furthermore, methylation status was also observed for both the genes, and compared between SiHa and C33A cells. The results demonstrated that the methylation of CGB3 and NOP56 (primer II) in SiHa cells was 61.18 and 53.94% compared with C33A cells (38.81 and 46.05%), respectively (Fig. 4A and C). The bar graph shows the mean ± standard error of the mean of CGB3 (P=0.004; Fig. 3B) and NOP56 methylation (P=0.045; Fig. 3D). The results indicated that the presence of HPV may influence the expression and methylation of CGB3 and NOP56 genes.
HPV 16 E7 induces promoter methylation and decreases gene expression
To assess whether HPV E7 induced gene promoter methylation and thus decreased expression, HPV 16 E7 was overexpressed in C33A (HPV-) cells. The results demonstrated that the expression of HPV 16 E7 was significantly higher in HPV 16 E7 transfected cells (P=0.001) compared with the PC transfected cells (Fig. 5).
Furthermore, alterations to gene promoter methylation and expression were assessed in HPV 16 E7 transfected C33A cells. At 72 h post-transfection, the band intensities of CGB3 and NOP56 were compared between E7- and PC-transfected cells. To measure gene expression and methylation, reverse transcription-PCR and MS-PCR were performed, respectively. The gene expression levels of CGB3 were significantly reduced (P=0.02) in HPV 16 E7 transfected cells (band intensity, 37.2%) compared with that in the PC transfected cells (band intensity, 62.7%) (Fig. 6A). The bar graph shows the mean ± standard error of CGB3 expression (Fig. 6B). NOP56 expression level in HPV 16 E7 transfected C33A cells was significantly decreased (P<0.0001) compared with that in the PC transfected cells (Fig. 7). GAPDH was used as an internal control. The expression of NOP56 was measured by qPCR.
Promoter methylation of both genes was significantly increased in HPV 16 E7 overexpressing C33A cells compared with that in the PC transfected cells. In HPV 16 E7 transfected C33A cells, the band intensities of CGB3 and NOP56 (Primer I) were 54.21 and 55.01%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the PC transfected cells (39.36 and 41.54%; P=0.005 and P=0.0004, respectively). The methylation positive control displayed band intensities of 6.43 and 3.45%, respectively (Fig. 8A and C). The bar graph shows the mean ± standard error of the mean of both CGB3 and NOP56 expression (Fig. 8B and D), respectively. The unmethylated forms of CGB3 and NOP56 (Primer I) in HPV 16 E7 transfected cells gradually decreased (data not shown).
Effect of 5-aza on gene promoter methylation and gene expression of CGB3 and NOP56
An association between promoter methylation and gene expression was confirmed by measuring mRNA expression levels in SiHa and C33A cells following 5-aza treatment. The C33A and SiHa cancer cells were treated continuously for 5 days with 5-aza at concentrations of 0, 3, 5 and 7 or 0, 20, 30 and 40 µM, respectively. Subsequently, DNA and RNA were extracted to measure promoter methylation and expression levels of each gene in cells following treatment with different concentrations of 5-aza.
The CGB3 and NOP56 (Primer II) promoter methylation results demonstrated that the methylation status of both gene promoters in C33A and SiHa cells were significantly decreased following treatment with different concentrations of 5-aza. The band densities of CGB3 and NOP56 methylation in C33A cells gradually decreased as the 5-aza concentration increased (0-7 µM; Fig. 9A and C), whereas the unmethylated forms of both genes in C33A cells increased with increasing 5-aza concentrations (data not shown). In parallel, the band densities of CGB3 and NOP56 methylation (Primer II) in SiHa cells decreased with increasing 5-aza concentrations (0-40 µM; Fig. 9B and D). The decrease in the methylation status of both CGB3 and NOP56 following treatment with different concentrations of 5-aza in C33A (P<0.0001 and P=0.0002; Fig. 10A and C) and SiHa (P<0.0001 and P=0.0002; Fig. 10B and D) cells was significant.
Gene expression was shown by using reverse transcription-PCR and qPCR. The band densities of CGB3 and NOP56 expression in C33A cells gradually increased with increasing 5-aza concentrations (0-7 µM; Fig. 11A and C). The expression of CGB3 and NOP56, as determined using qPCR, in C33A cells also significantly increased with all concentrations of 5-aza treatment (both P<0.0001; Fig. 11B and D). Similarly, the band densities of CGB3 and NOP56 observed in SiHa by RT-PCR gradually increased with increasing 5-aza concentration (0-40 µM; Fig. 12A and C). Expression of CGB3 and NOP56 measured by qPCR in SiHa cells were significantly higher when treated with 40 µM 5-aza (both P<0.0001; Fig. 12B and D).
Discussion
HPV is the primary cause of cervical cancer. There are several studies showing that HPV 16 E7 is involved in promoter methylation (22,24-25). Chalertpet et al (24) showed that HPV 16 E7 can interact with DNMT1 on the CCNA1 promoter leading to its methylation. Moreover, a study by Yanatatsaneejit et al (25) showed that HPV 16 E7 could induce CADM1 promoter methylation through the same mechanism as CCNA1. In contrast, DAPK1 promoter methylation could no be induced by HPV 16 E7(25). Therefore, it was hypothesized that there would be genes other than CCNA1 and CADM1 whose promoters are methylated by HPV 16 E7, and that there would be specific transcription factors binding with HPV 16 E7 on the gene promoter. A study by Na Rangsee et al,used STRING database protein network analysis, showed that E7 possibly forms a complex with the set of transcription factors containing a YY1 domain (26). In the present study, the binding site of HPV 16 E7 on the CCNA1 promoter was analyzed to identify the putative transcription factors. According to bioinformatics analysis, a list of genes was analyzed based on the presence of the promoter sequence found in the CCNA1 gene where HPV 16 E7 binds. Interestingly the genes CGB3 and NOP56 showed positive results. Thus, in addition to CCNA1 (24) and CADM1 (25), several other tumor suppressor genes may be affected by HPV 16 E7 through the same mechanism as that observed with CCNA1 and CADM1. To assess this, CGB3 and NOP56 methylation and expression were observed in two cervical cancer cell lines, HPV 16-positive SiHa and HPV-negative C33A cells. Both CGB3 and NOP56 expression in SiHa cells had lower band intensities compared with the C33A cells, suggesting that the presence of HPV in SiHa may induce promoter methylation and decrease the expression of the genes. Moreover, the expression of CGB3 and NOP56 in cells transfected with HPV 16 E7 and PC plasmids to assess the effect of HPV 16 E7 on the expression of these genes. Both genes exhibited lower expression in HPV 16 E7 transfected cells compared with the PC transfected cells, which demonstrated that HPV16 E7 induced promoter methylation of CGB3 and NOP56, resulting in the downregulation of these genes. Thus, the expression changes in CGB3 and NOP56 following methylation inhibition using the demethylating agent 5-aza was next assessed.
5-aza interferes with DNA methylation and can be used to reactivate silenced genes in cancer (31-34). Examples of genes reactivated following 5-aza treatment include CD44, GSTP-1, BRCA1, MDR1, MUC2 and GPC3, which possess hypermethylated promoter CpG islands in tumors (31). Wong et al (48) showed that methylation-mediated silencing of gene expression can be reversed by treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza. Reactivation of methylation-silenced genes indicates that the gene is functional, and that DNA methylation regulates its transcription (39,40). With regard to the present study, it was necessary to treat SiHa cells with higher concentrations of 5-aza compared with the C33A cells, as SiHa is a HPV positive cancer cell line, meaning that promoter methylation was more prominent in them. Therefore, the lower concentration of 5-aza may not overcome HPV-induced methylation in SiHa cells. Following treatment with 5-aza at higher concentrations of 20, 30 and 40 µM in SiHa cells, and at lower concentrations of 3, 5, and 7 µM in C33A cells for 5 days, it was found that the methylation levels of CGB3 and NOP56 were decreased leading to increased expression of both genes. At 40 µM, the re-expression of CGB3 and NOP56 genes was observed.
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that patients with cervical cancer with HPV infection should be treated with a higher concentration of 5-aza than patients without HPV infection (42,49). Taken together, the findings of the present study showed that 5-aza may serve as an alternative strategy of drug therapy for patients with cervical cancer with aberrant gene promoter methylation. Although the present study demonstrated that HPV16 E7 decreased the expression of CGB3 and NOP56, and that 5-aza treatment increased the expression of these genes, it cannot be concluded that these genes are tumor suppressor genes in cervical cancer. Further study of the function and effects of these genes in cervical cancer is thus required.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Professor Apiwat Mutirangura, Center of Excellence in Molecular Genetics of Cancer and Human Diseases, Chulalongkorn University for providing the laboratory equipment and valuable suggestions.
Funding
The present study was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund and Chulalongkorn University (grant no. RSA5880065), The National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand (grant no. P-15-50270) and the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
PSi performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. KC, JS and NW performed the experiments and analyzed the data. PSu performed the experiments. PY wrote the proposal for grants, designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. PSi and KC confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Pineros M, Znaor A, Soerjomataram I and Bray F: Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 2018. | |
Bosch FX, Burchell AN, Schiffman M, Giuliano AR, de Sanjose S, Bruni L, Tortolero-Luna G, Kjaer SK and Muñoz N: Epidemiology and natural history of human papillomavirus infections and type-specific implications in cervical neoplasia. Vaccine. 26 (Suppl 10):K1–K16. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers - a brief historical account. Virology. 384:260–265. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Muñoz N and Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: A meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 88:63–73. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Burd EM: Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Clin Microbiol Rev. 16:1–17. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Egawa N and Doorbar J: The low-risk papillomaviruses. Virus Res. 231:119–127. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, Herrero R, Castellsagué X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ and Meijer CJ: International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 348:518–527. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tulay P and Serakinci N: The role of human papillomaviruses in cancer progression. J Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2:201–213. 2016. | |
zur Hausen H and de Villiers EM: Human papillomaviruses. Annu Rev Microbiol. 48:427–447. 1994. | |
Havre PA, Yuan J, Hedrick L, Cho KR and Glazer PM: p53 inactivation by HPV16 E6 results in increased mutagenesis in human cells. Cancer Res. 55:4420–4424. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pim D, Massimi P and Banks L: Alternatively spliced HPV-18 E6* protein inhibits E6 mediated degradation of p53 and suppresses transformed cell growth. Oncogene. 15:257–264. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Caldeira S, Dong W and Tommasino M: Analysis of E7/Rb associations. Methods Mol Med. 119:363–379. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wu EW, Clemens KE, Heck DV and Münger K: The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein and the cellular transcription factor E2F bind to separate sites on the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein. J Virol. 67:2402–2407. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Collins AS, Nakahara T, Do A and Lambert PF: Interactions with pocket proteins contribute to the role of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 in the papillomavirus life cycle. J Virol. 79:14769–14780. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Slebos RJ, Lee MH, Plunkett BS, Kessis TD, Williams BO, Jacks T, Hedrick L, Kastan MB and Cho KR: p53-dependent G1 arrest involves pRB-related proteins and is disrupted by the human papillomavirus 16 E7 oncoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:5320–5324. 1994.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ and Howley PM: The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell. 63:1129–1136. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Villa LL: Human papillomaviruses and cervical cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 71:321–341. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schwarz E, Freese UK, Gissmann L, Mayer W, Roggenbuck B, Stremlau A and zur Hausen H: Structure and transcription of human papillomavirus sequences in cervical carcinoma cells. Nature. 314:111–114. 1985.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Au Yeung CL, Tsang WP, Tsang TY, Co NN, Yau PL and Kwok TT: HPV-16 E6 upregulation of DNMT1 through repression of tumor suppressor p53. Oncol Rep. 24:1599–1604. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Burgers WA, Blanchon L, Pradhan S, de Launoit Y, Kouzarides T and Fuks F: Viral oncoproteins target the DNA methyltransferases. Oncogene. 26:1650–1655. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sen P, Ganguly P and Ganguly N: Modulation of DNA methylation by human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncoproteins in cervical cancer. Oncol Lett. 15:11–22. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Li L, Xu C, Long J, Shen D, Zhou W, Zhou Q, Yang J and Jiang M: E6 and E7 gene silencing results in decreased methylation of tumor suppressor genes and induces phenotype transformation of human cervical carcinoma cell lines. Oncotarget. 6:23930–23943. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kulis M and Esteller M: DNA methylation and cancer. Adv Genet. 70:27–56. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chalertpet K, Pakdeechaidan W, Patel V, Mutirangura A and Yanatatsaneejit P: Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein mediates CCNA1 promoter methylation. Cancer Sci. 106:1333–1340. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yanatatsaneejit P, Chalertpet K, Sukbhattee J, Nuchcharoen I, Phumcharoen P and Mutirangura A: Promoter methylation of tumor suppressor genes induced by human papillomavirus in cervical cancer. Oncol Lett. 20:955–961. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Na Rangsee N, Yanatatsaneejit P, Pisitkun T, Somparn P, Jintaridth P and Topanurak S: Host proteome linked to HPV E7-mediated specific gene hypermethylation in cancer pathways. Infect Agent Cancer. 15(7)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Śliwa A, Kubiczak M, Szczerba A, Walkowiak G, Nowak-Markwitz E, Burczyńska B, Butler S, Iles R, Białas P and Jankowska A: Regulation of human chorionic gonadotropin beta subunit expression in ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 19(746)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bellet D, Lazar V, Bièche I, Paradis V, Giovangrandi Y, Paterlini P, Lidereau R, Bedossa P, Bidart JM and Vidaud M: Malignant transformation of nontrophoblastic cells is associated with the expression of chorionic gonadotropin beta genes normally transcribed in trophoblastic cells. Cancer Res. 57:516–523. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sohr S and Engeland K: The tumor suppressor p53 induces expression of the pregnancy-supporting human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) CGB7 gene. Cell Cycle. 10:3758–3767. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gong J, Li Y, Liu CJ, Xiang Y, Li C, Ye Y, Zhang Z, Hawke DH, Park PK, Diao L, et al: A Pan-cancer analysis of the expression and clinical relevance of small nucleolar RNAs in human cancer. Cell Rep. 21:1968–1981. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Christman JK: 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: Mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 21:5483–5495. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stresemann C and Lyko F: Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacytidine and decitabine. Int J Cancer. 123:8–13. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Glover AB and Leyland-Jones B: Biochemistry of azacitidine: A review. Cancer Treat Rep. 71:959–964. 1987.PubMed/NCBI | |
Miranda TB and Jones PA: DNA methylation: The nuts and bolts of repression. J Cell Physiol. 213:384–390. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Müller A and Florek M: 5-Azacytidine/Azacitidine. Recent Results Cancer Res. 184:159–170. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lande-Diner L, Zhang J, Ben-Porath I, Amariglio N, Keshet I, Hecht M, Azuara V, Fisher AG, Rechavi G and Cedar H: Role of DNA methylation in stable gene repression. J Biol Chem. 282:12194–12200. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cheng JC, Matsen CB, Gonzales FA, Ye W, Greer S, Marquez VE, Jones PA and Selker EU: Inhibition of DNA methylation and reactivation of silenced genes by zebularine. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95:399–409. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ferguson AT, Lapidus RG, Baylin SB and Davidson NE: Demethylation of the estrogen receptor gene in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells can reactivate estrogen receptor gene expression. Cancer Res. 55:2279–2283. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Karpf AR and Jones DA: Reactivating the expression of methylation silenced genes in human cancer. Oncogene. 21:5496–5503. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baylin SB: DNA methylation and gene silencing in cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2 (Suppl 1):S4–S11. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sova P, Feng Q, Geiss G, Wood T, Strauss R, Rudolf V, Lieber A and Kiviat N: Discovery of novel methylation biomarkers in cervical carcinoma by global demethylation and microarray analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 15:114–123. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Biktasova A, Hajek M, Sewell A, Gary C, Bellinger G, Deshpande HA, Bhatia A, Burtness B, Judson B, Mehra S, et al: Demethylation therapy as a targeted treatment for human papillomavirus-associated head and neck cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 23:7276–7287. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Messeguer X, Escudero R, Farré D, Núñez O, Martínez J and Albà MM: PROMO: Detection of known transcription regulatory elements using species-tailored searches. Bioinformatics. 18:333–334. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Farré D, Roset R, Huerta M, Adsuara JE, Roselló L, Albà MM and Messeguer X: Identification of patterns in biological sequences at the ALGGEN server: PROMO and MALGEN. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3651–3653. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fornes O, Castro-Mondragon JA, Khan A, van der Lee R, Zhang X, Richmond PA, Modi BP, Correard S, Gheorghe M, Baranašić D, et al: JASPAR 2020: Update of the open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 48:D87–D92. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF and Sambrook J: Isolation of DNA from mammalian cells. In: Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Nolan C (ed). Cold Spring Harbor, New York, NY, 9.16-9.23, 1982. | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wong J, Sia YY, Misso NL, Aggarwal S, Ng A and Bhoola KD: Effects of the demethylating agent, 5-azacytidine, on expression of the kallikrein-kinin genes in carcinoma cells of the lung and pleura. Patholog Res Int. 2011(167046)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Abdulhaq H and Rossetti JM: The role of azacitidine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 16:1967–1975. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |