Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study

  • Authors:
    • Yasunari Hiramine
    • Hirofumi Uto
    • Yasushi Imamura
    • Kazuaki Tabu
    • Yoshirou Baba
    • Takuya Hiwaki
    • Yukihiko Sho
    • Kenji Tahara
    • Hirofumi Higashi
    • Tutomu Tamai
    • Makoto Oketani
    • Akio Ido
    • Hirohito Tsubouchi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 21, 2011     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.237
  • Pages: 433-441
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Sorafenib is a kinase-targeted drug that has high efficacy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to determine whether sorafenib is more effective than hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for HCC. Twenty patients treated with sorafenib (sorafenib group) initiated at 800 mg/day and 45 patients treated with HAIC (HAIC group) for unresectable Child-Pugh A advanced HCC were investigated retrospectively. The treatment effect was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). As a result, the overall response rate was significantly lower in the sorafenib group than in the HAIC group (P=0.03), while the disease control and survival rates did not differ between the two groups. In the sorafenib group, treatment was discontinued in 19 patients, including 12 due to side effects. In subgroups of patients treated with sorafenib, the survival rate was significantly lower in patients (n=11) administered sorafenib for <60 days compared to those (n=9) treated for ≥60 days. A shorter treatment period (<60 days) was an independent risk factor for unfavorable survival [hazard ratio (HR), 3.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.45-7.66 vs. HAIC], while survival in patients treated with sorafenib for ≥60 days did not differ from those treated with HAIC (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.27-2.34). In conclusion, the disease control and survival rates of patients treated with sorafenib for advanced HCC were comparable to such rates in patients treated with HAIC. However, the prognosis was poor when long-term sorafenib treatment was not possible due to side effects, demonstrating the importance of patient selection for sorafenib treatment.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-June 2011
Volume 2 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hiramine Y, Uto H, Imamura Y, Tabu K, Baba Y, Hiwaki T, Sho Y, Tahara K, Higashi H, Tamai T, Tamai T, et al: Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study. Exp Ther Med 2: 433-441, 2011.
APA
Hiramine, Y., Uto, H., Imamura, Y., Tabu, K., Baba, Y., Hiwaki, T. ... Tsubouchi, H. (2011). Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2, 433-441. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.237
MLA
Hiramine, Y., Uto, H., Imamura, Y., Tabu, K., Baba, Y., Hiwaki, T., Sho, Y., Tahara, K., Higashi, H., Tamai, T., Oketani, M., Ido, A., Tsubouchi, H."Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2.3 (2011): 433-441.
Chicago
Hiramine, Y., Uto, H., Imamura, Y., Tabu, K., Baba, Y., Hiwaki, T., Sho, Y., Tahara, K., Higashi, H., Tamai, T., Oketani, M., Ido, A., Tsubouchi, H."Sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 2, no. 3 (2011): 433-441. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.237