Safety and efficacy of a non‑polymeric paclitaxel‑eluting microporous stent in real‑world percutaneous coronary intervention
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 11, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1217
- Pages: 811-815
Abstract
Introduction
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major mortality-causing disease, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a conventional method for the treatment of CAD (1,2). The use of a bare metal stent (BMS) in PCI may reduce the incidence of restenosis for simple balloon dilatations; however, it is not completely accepted in clinical practice. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) improve the efficacy of percutaneous coronary artery revascularization by reducing neointimal development and the resultant in-stent restenosis (3,4). This improvement in PCI durability has led to the widespread adoption of DESs throughout the interventional cardiology community, while the appearance of first-generation DESs with permanent polymer coatings has resulted in a further reduction in the restenosis and target lesion revascularization rates compared with those of BMSs (5–7). PCI with DES implantation has become the standard of care for CAD, reducing the requirement for repeat intervention by 50–70% in comparison with BMSs. However, the follow-ups have revealed that the incidence of late and very late thrombosis of the DES following the discontinuation of dual antiplatelet drug administration increases progressively with time (8–10). It has been demonstrated that, following the implantation of a DES with a permanent polymer coating, the continued existence of the coating may result in a foreign body reaction and delayed re-endothelialization. This is one of the important pathogenic factors for late and very late thrombosis. At present, there is an increasing focus on stents that have a biodegradable polymer coating, rather than a permanent polymer coating. (11). In early selectively observed cases, it has been observed that a non-polymeric paclitaxel-eluting microporous (YINYI™) stent is safe and effective (12).
In the current study, the clinical application of a YINYI™ stent in real-world PCI was further investigated using a long-term follow-up, and the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of the stent were evaluated. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), restenosis, stent thrombosis, recurrence of angina pectoris and target lesion revascularization. It was observed that the incidence of MACEs was low and at an acceptable level. Furthermore, the number of stent thrombosis cases was reduced, in comparison with previous values for durable polymer coating stents. From the results of this study, it was concluded that the YINYI™ stent is safe and able to lower the incidence of stent thrombosis.
Materials and methods
Patients
Follow-ups were conducted on 404 patients from January 2008 to March 2010 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, China). The average follow-up period was 15 months. All patients were implanted with YINYI™ stents (Liaoning Biomedical Materials R&D Center Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) in real-life PCI. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approval from the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
PCI method
Following routine coronary angiography, the YINYI™ stent was implanted according to standard surgical procedures. The surgical approach for particular lesions was decided by the first surgeon. The lesion and balloon predilation sites were fully covered by the stent (releasing pressure >16 atm, 3–5 mm overlap for tandem stents). The criteria for a successful stent implantation comprised a satisfactory dilation and a residual stenosis rate of <20%. Multi-position projection, following nitroglycerin injection into the coronary artery, was performed to determine the pre- and postoperative degree of stenosis. Outpatient follow-ups were performed 1, 6, 12 and 15 months subsequent to the PCI, respectively.
Peri- and postoperative medication
Prior to the surgery, aspirin (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) were orally administered for ≥5 days (for emergency surgery, 300 and 600 mg/day were administered, respectively). The postoperative aspirin dosage was adjusted to 300 mg/day, and, following three days, to 100 mg/day, while the clopidogrel dosage was adjusted to 75 mg/day. Tirofiban was selectively used according to the clinical condition of the patient.
Follow-up endpoints and definitions
The follow-up endpoint was the occurrence of a MACE, defined as follows: i) Cardiac death, including unexplained sudden death; ii) non-fatal MI, where a new pathologic Q wave or ST-T change appeared in at least two adjacent leads in the electrocardiogram, where the creatine kinase (CK)-MB value was three-fold greater than the upper limit of the normal reference range or where the troponin level was five-fold greater than the normal reference range; iii) restenosis, where radiography revealed the stenosis rate of the target lesions in the stent implantation site and the segment 5 mm to the stent edge to be >70%; iv) stent thrombosis [Academic Research Consortium (ARC) definitions] (13), classified as definitive (where coronary angiography revealed a thrombus in the stent-implantation site and the segment 5 mm to the stent edge), possible (where unknown death occurred within 30 days postoperatively and MI occurred in the dominant region of the stent-implanted vessel at any time following the PCI) or suspicious (unexplained death 30 days following the PCI) stent thrombosis; v) recurrence of angina pectoris, where the angina pectoris reappeared for patients with a postoperative disappearance of the angina or returned to preoperative levels for patients with postoperative angina pectoris mitigation; vi) target lesion revascularization, where bypass surgery, stent re-implantation or balloon dilatation were required.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, while the enumeration data are expressed as a frequency, with a 95% confidence interval. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to observe the correlation between the MACEs and the risk factors. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
General clinical data
A total of 404 patients were implanted with YINYITM stents from 2008 to 2010. The study population consisted of 350 males (86.6%) and 54 females (13.4%), with an average age of 63.5±10.3 years. One hundred and twelve patients (27.7%) presented with an acute MI, among whom 86 patients were treated with emergency stenting, while coronary angiography and stenting were conducted on the remaining 26. Hypertension was apparent as a complication in 62.6% of patients, and unstable or stable angina pectoris in 49% of patients. There were 94 cases with a history of recent or old MI (23.3%; Table I).
Table IGeneral clinical data for patients implanted with a non-polymeric paclitaxel-eluting microporous (YINYI™) stent (n=404). |
Coronary angiography and PCI
As shown in Table II, there was a total of 598 target lesion sites. A total of 686 YINYI™ stents were implanted, which was an average of 1.70 stents per patient. There were 16 stents implanted in the left main coronary artery, 248 stents in the left anterior descending artery (12 stents in the diagonal branch of the artery), 164 stents in the left circumflex artery (68 stents in the obtuse marginal artery) and 258 stents in the right coronary artery (13 stents in the posterior descending artery). The site of stent implantation was selected according to the radiographic results. The lesions were classified as type A (43.8%), types B1 and B2 (40.1%, in combination) and complex type C lesions (16.1%; Table II). All patients satisfied the criteria of successful angiography. No recurrent ischemia, sudden death or MI occurred during hospitalization. The pressure of releasing stent was higher than that of other drug-eluting stents, and post-dilatation was necessary (Table III).
Results of follow-ups
The results of the follow-ups are shown in Table IV. In the one-month follow-up, there were four fatalities (0.99%) due to sudden death and eight patients presented with recurrent angina pectoris, and were hospitalized for coronary angiography. Among these eight patients, stent restenosis was observed in three cases, resulting in target lesion revascularization treatment. The remaining five cases presented with mild intimal hyperplasia but not in-stent restenosis, and were treated with interventional therapy.
In the six-month follow-up, 13 cases (3.25%) presented with angina pectoris. Among these 13 cases, restenosis was observed in five cases (1.25%), three of which were treated with target lesion revascularization and two of which were re-hospitalized due to MI. There were no fatalities. The 12 month follow-up revealed 18 cases (4.50%) with a recurrence of angina pectoris, out of which restenosis was observed in eight cases (2%). Five of the eight cases were treated with target lesion revascularization, one case was treated with bypass surgery and one was re-hospitalized due to MI. In the 15 month follow-up, there was a recurrence of angina pectoris in 22 cases (5.5%). Among these 22 cases, restenosis was observed in 10 cases (2.5%), eight of which were treated with target lesion revascularization and one of which was treated with bypass surgery. No MIs or fatalities occurred during this follow-up period.
The cumulative incidence of MACEs was 8.17%. The incidences of cardiac death, non-fatal MI, restenosis, target lesion revascularization and recurrent angina pectoris were 0.99, 0.74, 6.44, 4.71 and 15.10%, respectively.
Discussion
An ideal DES is required to possess a strong anti-restenosis ability and to effectively prevent late and very late thrombosis (14,15). The formation of stent thrombosis may be predominantly correlated with the polymer on surface of the DES (16). Therefore, for an ideal stent, there is a requirement for the polymer to be removed, resulting in a stent with the restenosis-reducing function of a DES and the long-term safety and clinical efficacy of a BMS (17,18). It has been observed in previous studies that the coating of a biodegradable drug-carrying polymer on the metal stent surface is able effectively inhibit intimal hyperplasia and negative remodeling following vascular injury, and reduce restenosis and late adverse reactions, such as stent thrombosis and late restenosis. The long term efficacy and safety of stents with biodegradable coatings has been indicated clinically (19–21).
Third-generation stents are ideal DESs; however, at present they are not frequently utilized clinically. The YINYI™ stent is made by microvias technology (Liaoning Biomedical Materials R&D Center Co., Ltd.), with special treatment of the metal surface, resulting in micro-blind holes that are able to store and carry drugs. This stent is a type of non-polymeric DES. The coverage rate of the microvia in the YINYI™ stent is >55%, with a shortening rate of <8%, a rebound rate of <10% and drug loading capability of 0.85±0.15 μg/mm2. It is a third-generation DES currently used in clinical practice worldwide.
In this study, YINYI™ stents were used in real-life PCIs for various types of CADs and lesions. With regard to the disease type, angina pectoris accounted for 49% of total cases and a history of old or recent MI and acute MI accounted for 23.3 and 27.7%, respectively. With regard to the lesion type, as observed by coronary angiography, the diseases included various types of lesions, such as left main coronary artery, bifurcation, chronic occlusive and long lesions. The proportion of each type of lesion was identical to that observed in general clinical practice, with good imageology and long-term follow-up results.
Hannan et al(12) observed that the mortality rate within one month subsequent to the PCI was ~0.94% (hospitalization, 0.56%; discharge, 0.38%). The majority of the mortalities were young patients with a more efficient heart function. In the current study, there were four (0.99%) fatalities within one month subsequent to the PCI, which was similar to the result of the study by Hannan et al. The predominant cause of mortality was sudden death, which was correlated with stent thrombosis (ARC definition). There have been no fatalities within the treatment group since 2009. The results of the long-term clinical follow-up revealed that the restenosis rate for the YINYI™ stent within two and six months postoperatively was 4 and 1.25%, respectively. This was similar to the results obtained in previous studies (22,23), which indicated that the early restenosis rate was 5% and that the restenosis rate in the clinical follow-up was relatively low.
According to the basic structural characteristics of the YINYI™ stent, there is a requirement for the stent to be released under high pressure, in order that the drug-carring suface is in close proximity to the vascular intima. This ensures the slow-release of the drug over an extended period of time. At present, the releasing pressure of a DES with permanent polymer coating is ~6 atm, with a low ratio of high-pressure post-dilatation. In this study, the average releasing pressure of the YINYI™ stent was 14 atm, with a higher ratio of high-pressure post-dilatation. The limitation of this study was the relatively small sample size and a further study of the clinical results from a five year follow-up is required. Moreover, the sample size for complex lesions in the present study was small, due to the limitation of stent length, and this therefore requires further investigation.
In conclusion, the YINYI™ stent has been demonstrated in short and long-term clinical follow-ups to be effective and safe for use in PCI for patients with CAD.
References
Blagojevic A, Delaney JA, Lévesque LE, Dendukuri N, Boivin JF and Brophy JM: Investigation of an interaction between statins and clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention: a cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 18:362–369. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
World Health Organization. The top ten causes of death. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/index.htmluri. Accessed September 4, 2007 | |
Lemos PA, Hoye A, Goedhart D, et al: Clinical, angiographic, and procedural predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in complex patients: an evaluation from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) study. Circulation. 109:1366–1370. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lemos PA, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT, et al: Unrestricted utilization of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with conventional bare stent implantation in the ‘real world’: The Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. Circulation. 109:190–195. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Harjai KJ, Sattur S, Orshaw P and Boura J: Long-term safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stents compared to bare metal stents following successful PCI in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: findings from the Guthrie Health Off-Label StenT (GHOST) Registry. J Interv Cardiol. 25:28–36. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Green SM, Selzer F, Mulukutla SR, et al: Comparison of bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in patients with chronic kidney disease (from the NHLBI Dynamic Registry). Am J Cardiol. 108:1658–1664. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cannon L, et al; TAXUS V Investigators. Comparison of a polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent with a bare metal stent in patients with complex coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 294:1215–1223. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pfisterer M, Brunner-La Rocca HP, Buser PT, et al: Late clinical events after clopidogrel discontinuation may limit the benefit of drug-eluting stents: an observation study of drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 48:2584–2591. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee MG, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, et al; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Comparison of paclitaxel-, sirolimus-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and metabolic syndrome. Circ J. 75:2120–2127. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mauri L, Hsieh WH, Massaro JM, Ho KK, D’Agostino R and Cutlip DE: Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. N Eng J Med. 356:1020–1029. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wykrzykowska JJ, Garg S, Onuma Y, et al: Implantation of the biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent in patients with high SYNTAX score is associated with decreased cardiac mortality compared to a permanent polymer sirolimus-eluting stent: two year follow-up results from the ‘all-comers’ LEADERS trial. EuroIntervention. 7:605–613. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang RY, Zhang Q, Zhu JZ, et al: Safety and efficacy of polymer-free paclitaxel-eluting microporous stent in real-world practice: 1-year follow-up of the SERY-I registry. Chin Med J (Engl). 124:3521–3526. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vranckx P, Kint PP, Morel MA, et al: Identifying stent thrombosis, a critical appraisal of the academic research consortium (ARC) consensus definitions: a lighthouse and as a toe in the water. EuroIntervention. 4(Suppl C): C39–44. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kwan TW, Cherukuri S, Huang Y, et al: Feasibility and safety of 7F sheathless guiding catheter during transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 80:274–280. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chieffo A, Morici N, Maisano F, et al: Percutaneous treatment with drug-eluting stent implantation versus bypass surgery for unprotected left main stenosis: a single-center experience. Circulation. 113:2542–2547. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Virmani R, Guagliumi G, Farb A, et al: Localized hypersensitivity and late coronary thrombosis secondary to a sirolimus-eluting stent: should we be cautious? Circulation. 109:701–705. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Steffel J, Eberli FR, Lüscher TF and Tanner FC: Drug-eluting stents - what should be improved? Ann Med. 40:242–252. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, et al: Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 356:998–1008. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wykrzykowska JJ, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, et al: Impact of vessel size on angiographic and clinical outcomes of revascularization with biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer and sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer: the LEADERS trial substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2:861–870. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chevalier B, Silber S, Park SJ, et al; NOBORI 1 Clinical Investigators. Randomized comparison of the Nobori Biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent with the Taxus Liberté paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries: the NOBORI 1 trial - Phase 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2:188–195. 2009. | |
Floyd KC, Jayne JE, Kaplan AV, et al: Age-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Interv Cardiol. 19:381–387. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Y, Li CX, Wang HC, et al: Efficacy and safety of Firebird sirolimus-eluting stent in treatment of complex coronary lesions in Chinese patients: one-year clinical and eight-month angiographic outcomes from the FIREMAN registry. Chin Med J (Engl). 124:817–824. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu M, Zhou YJ, Wang ZJ, et al: A comparison of clinical outcomes of Chinese sirolimus-eluting stents versus foreign sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary artery disease. Neth Heart J. 19:418–422. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |