Expression of porcine protegrin-1 in Pichia pastoris and its anticancer activity in vitro
Corrigendum in: /10.3892/etm.2022.11713
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 22, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2202
- Pages: 1075-1079
Abstract
Introduction
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are significant components of the innate immune systems of numerous animal species, where they act as an effective, largely non-discriminatory first line of defense against invading pathogens (1). A variety of AMPs have been identified from a variety of sources, ranging from plants and insects to lower vertebrates and mammals, as described in previous studies (2,3).
Protegrin-1 (PG-1) is a β-hairpin AMP of 18 amino acids (RGGRLCYCRRRFCVCVGR) that was originally isolated from porcine leukocytes (4). PG-1 is rich in cationic residues, such as arginine (Arg). The amphipathic characteristic of this peptide enables it to interact with the membranes of pathogens and kill the pathogen by releasing its cellular contents (5). Studies have revealed a number of the key steps in the action of protegrin, including: Protegrin monomers dimerize in various types of lipid environment; protegrin peptides interact strongly with lipid bilayer membranes, particularly those that contain anionic lipids; and protegrins form pores in lipid bilayers, which results in uncontrolled ion transport and may be a key factor in bacterial death (1). PG-1 is considered as a potential pharmaceutical agent as it has shown a broad range of antimicrobial activities against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli (E. coli), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (5–7).
For pharmaceutical applications, a large quantity of AMP is required. Chemical synthesis of AMPs is not economically practical, particularly for the production of long peptides. Thus, a biological expression system would be an improved alternative method of production (2). Numerous biological expression systems have been introduced for the economical production of AMPs (8). For the production of recombinant AMPs, E. coli-based systems are well established (8,9) and Pichia pastoris (P. pastoris) expression systems are frequently used (10–14). However, each system has limitations, including poor recovery yields, proteolysis of products, low expression levels, toxicity of the product to host cells, and occasionally an absence of the post-translational modifications required for the biological activity of the AMPs (2,8,15).
The aim of the present study was to express the antimicrobial peptide PG-1 in P. pastoris X-33, isolate the recombinant product and investigate its anticancer activity.
Materials and methods
Strains, vector, enzymes and other reagents
E. coli DH5α (Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used for plasmid amplification and P. pastoris X-33 was used for the expression of the fusion protein. The pPICZα-A expression vector and P. pastoris X-33 were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The restriction endonuclease, T4 DNA ligase and Taq DNA polymerase were purchased from Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Ni-chelating Sepharose columns were purchased from Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Cell culture
The HepG2 cell line was obtained from the Medical College of Henan University of Science and Technology (Luoyang, China). The cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Co. Ltd.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.
Design and synthesis of the PG-1 nucleotide sequence
Based on the primary amino acid sequences of the mature peptide and according to codon preference of P. pastoris X-33, the gene sequence encoding PG-1 (Fig. 1A) was synthesized and used to construct the plasmid pUC57-PG-1 (Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Co. Ltd.). An XhoI restriction enzyme site was introduced to allow in-frame cloning into the α-factor secretion signal of the pPICZα-PG-1 shuttle vector. A sequence encoding the Kex2 cleavage site (LEKR) and a 6His-tag were added upstream and downstream of the PG-1 codon sequence, respectively. A termination codon of PG-1 was introduced at the C-terminus, along with a XbaI restriction enzyme site (Fig. 1B).
Construction of the expression vectors
With the plasmid pUC57-PG-1 as the template, the gene encoding PG-1 was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the common primers pUC57+ (5′-ATCAGGCGCCATTCGCCATTC-3′) and pUC57- (5′-CAGGTTCCCGACTGGAAAG-3′). The PCR mixture had a total volume of 50 μl and comprised 5 μl 10X PCR buffer, 4 μl dNTP mixture, 1 μl 20 μl/ml primer pUC57+, 1 μl 20 μl/ml primer pUC57-, 2 μl template, 1 μl Taq DNA polymerase and 36 μl ddH2O. The PCR procedure involved 4 min predenaturation at 95°C; 30 sec denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec annealing at 53°C and 30 sec extension at 72°C for 30 cycles; followed by 3 min extension at 72°C. The amplified products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products were and the pPICZα A plasmid were double digested with XhoI and XbaI respectively, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase to generate the fusion vector pPICZα-A. The plasmid was then digested with the same restriction enzymes, to generate the fusion vector pPICZα-A-PG-1. The ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli DH5α, and recombinant E. coli cells were selected on Zeocin-containing lysogeny broth plates (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The recombinant plasmid pPICZα-A-PG-1 was confirmed by restriction endonuclease digestion and DNA sequencing analysis.
Transformation of P. pastoris and selection of transformants
pPICZα-A-PG-1 was linearized with SacI and transformed into competent cells of P. pastoris X-33 (Mut+) by electroporation (Gene Pulser Xcell™ Electroporation System; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pichia Expression kit; Invitrogen Life Technologies). The empty pPICZα-A vector was similarly linearized and transformed into P. pastoris X-33 as a negative control. All Zeocin-resistant colonies growing in Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 1 M sorbitol, 2% agar and 100 mg/ml Zeocin) plates were plated in duplicate onto either minimal methanol with histidine [MMH; 1.34% yeast nitrogen base (YNB), 0.05% biotin, 0.5% methanol and 1.5% agar] or minimal dextrose with histidine (MDH; 1.34% YNB, 0.05% biotin, 1% dextrose and 1.5% agar) plates to characterize the methanol-utilizing phenotype. Mut+ strains were obtained from the MDH plates and the inserts were evaluated by PCR amplification of the yeast genomic DNA template, using the common aldehyde oxidase 1 primers (5′-GACTGGTTCCAATTGACAAGC and 5′-GCAAATGGCATTCTGACATCC). These strains were subsequently used for the suspension culture.
Heterologous expression of recombinant PG-1 in P. pastoris X-33
The positive P. pastoris transformants were selected and inoculated in 10 ml buffered glycerol-complex medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 1.34% YNB, 4×10−5% biotin and 1% glycerol) for 24 h at 28°C. When the cell density reached ~0.6 at optical density (OD)600 (725 UV Visible Spectrophotometer; Shanghai Precision & Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 2 min and resuspended to an OD600 of 1.0 in buffered methanol-complex medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.0, 1.34% YNB, 4×10−5% biotin and 1.0% methanol). The cells were then cultured for 4–5 days at 28°C in a flask while adding methanol to a final concentration of 1% every 24 h. The cell culture medium was harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min. The presence of the fusion protein in the supernatant was analyzed by Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Tricine-SDS-PAGE) with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining (16). As shown in Fig. 2, a major protein recombinant PG-1 band of ~2.9 kDa appeared following induction for 4 days. The protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard (17).
Purification of peptide PG-1 and concentration determination
The expression supernatant was applied to a Ni-chelating Sepharose column (1.6×10 cm) pre-equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline to purify the PG-1 fusion protein. Subsequently, the column was washed with 20 bed volumes of the same buffer to remove contaminating proteins. The protein was eluted with a linear gradient from 0.1 to 1.0 M imidazole in 1X Ni-NTA elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4 pH 8.0 and 300 mM NaCl). The peak amount of PG-1 eluted was determined by analysis of the fractions with 15% Tricine-SDS-PAGE, and the fractions containing PG-1 were collected. The collected fractions were dialyzed in Milli-Q water (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The protein concentration of the purified PG-1 was determined using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent with BSA as standard. Subsequently, the purified peptide was lyophilized and stored at −20°C until use.
In vitro assay for cytotoxic activity
The cytotoxicity of the purified PG-1 fusion protein was determined by a tetrazolium (MTT) assay (18). The HepG2 cells (3×103 cells/well) were plated in 100 μl DMEM per well in 96-well plates (Costar Corning, Corning, NY, USA). Following overnight incubation, purified PG-1 was added in various concentrations (10, 20, 40, 60 and 160 μg/ml) to the wells, with six wells for each concentration. After treatment with purified PG-1 for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 days, 20 μl 5 mg/ml MTT (pH 4.7) was added to each well and the cells were cultivated for a further 4 h. The supernatant fluid was then removed, 100 μl DMSO was added to each well and the samples were agitated for 15 min. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured with a microplate reader (Bio-Rad) using wells without cells as blanks. Three independent experiments were performed for each set of conditions.
Results
Construction of the recombinant plasmid pPICZα-A-PG-1
Using degenerate primers, the PG-1 gene was amplified by PCR and verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR product was ligated into the pPICZα-A expression vector together with an α-mating factor secretion signal sequence at the N-terminus and a 6His-tag at the C-terminus of the PG-1 peptide. The recombinant plasmid pPICZα-A-PG-1 was successfully constructed and verified by restriction enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing.
Recombinant pPICZα-A-PG-1 expression and purification
The recombinant plasmid pPICZα-A-PG-1 was linearized with SacI and transformed into competent cells of P. pastoris X-33. The pPICZα-A-PG-1 transformants of P. pastoris were grown in flasks at 28°C and, after culture for 120 h, the cell culture medium was harvested by centrifugation. The supernatant from the flask culture was analyzed by Tricine-SDS-PAGE. As shown in Fig. 2, a major band at ~2.9 kDa was observed after a 96-h induction. The protein concentration in the supernatent was 15.6mg/100ml, as measured using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Using an Ni-NTA column, the fusion protein was eluted at 250 mM imidazole. The eluted fractions were collected and dialyzed, and the results of the Tricine-SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3) indicated that the recombinant PG-1 fusion protein (2.9 kDa) had been obtained with high-purity. Approximately 20 mg PG-1/6His was purified from 500 ml culture medium.
Cytotoxic activity of PG-1 against HepG2 cells
The results of the in vitro assay of the cytotoxic activity of the PG-1 fusion protein against HepG2 cells are shown in Fig. 4. The percentage of growth inhibition of the HepG2 cells by PG-1/6His at various concentrations was determined by the number of viable treated cells in comparison with the number of viable cells of the untreated controls. The results showed that PG-1/6His had a dose- and time-dependent inhibitory effect on cell growth.
Discussion
PG-1 (H3N+-RGGRLCYCRRRFCVCVGR-CONH2), with a high content of positively charged Arg and cysteine (Cys) residues, has a β-hairpin structure that is stabilized by disulfide bonds linking Cys-6 and Cys-15, and Cys-8 and Cys-13 (19,20). Its rigid structure separates the hydrophobic and hydrophilic residues of the peptide, resulting in PG-1 having an amphipathic nature that is common to numerous other types of AMP (1,21). PG-1 is highly cationic (charge of 7+) at physiological pH, which is essential for its ability to bind strongly to bacterial cell membranes. It is the amphipathic characteristic of PG-1 that enables it to interact with the membranes of pathogens (4). Protegrin monomers dimerize in various types of lipid environment (1,4,19,21,22). However, the characteristics of the protegrin peptide biologically expressed in the present study, and whether fusion to 6His affects its structure and function are unknown. These factors require investigation in further studies.
The methylotrophic yeast P. pastoris has been utilized widely as a heterologous gene expression system. Although PG-1 has been successfully expressed in E. coli (8), the expression levels that have been achieved are lower than those obtained for P. pastoris-derived PG-1 in the present study. Furthermore, certain recombinant AMPs produced in P. pastoris have stronger activity than those produced in E. coli, including crab AMP scygonadin (12), plant defensin corn 1 (23), human secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (24) and non-specific lipid-transfer proteins (25).
In order to facilitate the purification of PG-1 in the present study, a 6His-tag was introduced at the C-terminus of PG-1. A previous study has observed that Mdcec/6His has the same levels of activity against bacteria as those of Mdcec, and has slightly increased activity levels against fungi (11). P. pastoris-derived scygonadin/6His has been effectively expressed with higher activity levels against bacteria than those of scygonadin (12). In the present study, the expressed PG-1/6His demonstrated strong dose- and time-dependent anticancer activity against HepG2 cells.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from Henan University of Science and Technology Youth Science Fund Project (2010QN0015) and Ph.D. Programs Foundation (09001279).
References
Bolintineanu DS and Kaznessis YN: Computational studies of protegrin antimicrobial peptides: a review. Peptides. 32:188–201. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Wang L, Lai C, Wu Q, Liu J, Zhou M, Ren Z, Sun D, Chen S and Xu A: Production and characterization of a novel antimicrobial peptide HKABF by Pichia pastoris. Process Biochem. 43:1124–1131. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen H, Xu Z, Peng L, Fang X, Yin X, Xu N and Cen P: Recent advances in the research and development of human defensins. Peptides. 27:931–940. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rui H, Lee J and Im W: Comparative molecular dynamics simulation studies of protegrin-1 monomer and dimer in two different lipid bilayers. Biophys J. 97:787–795. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Panchal RG, Smart ML, Bowser DN, Williams DA and Petrou S: Pore-forming proteins and their application in biotechnology. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 3:99–115. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kokryakov VN, Harwig SS, Panyutich EA, Shevchenko AA, Aleshina GM, Shamova OV, et al: Protegrins: leukocyte antimicrobial peptides that combine features of corticostatic defensins and tachyplesins. FEBS Lett. 327:231–236. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qu XD, Harwig SS, Shafer WM and Lehrer RI: Protegrin structure and activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect Immun. 65:636–639. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fan F, Wu Y and Liu J: Expression and purification of two different antimicrobial peptides, PR-39 and Protegrin-1 in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 73:147–151. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng X, Liu C, Guo J, Song X, Li J, Xu W and Li Z: Recombinant expression, purification, and antimicrobial activity of a novel hybrid antimicrobial peptide LFT33. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 95:1191–1198. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moers AP, Wolbert EJ, de Wolf FA and Werten MW: Secreted production of self-assembling peptides in Pichia pastoris by fusion to an artificial highly hydrophilic protein. J Biotechnol. 146:66–73. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin F, Xu X, Zhang W and Gu D: Expression and characterization of a housefly cecropin gene in the methylotrophic yeast, Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif. 49:39–46. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peng H, Liu HP, Chen B, Hao H and Wang KJ: Optimized production of scygonadin in Pichia pastoris and analysis of its antimicrobial and antiviral activities. Protein Expr Purif. 82:37–44. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang J, Yang Y, Teng D, Tian Z, Wang S and Wang J: Expression of plectasin in Pichia pastoris and its characterization as a new antimicrobial peptide against Staphyloccocus and Streptococcus. Protein Expr Purif. 78:189–196. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niu M, Li X, Wei J, Cao R, Zhou B and Chen P: The molecular design of a recombinant antimicrobial peptide CP and its in vitro activity. Protein Expr Purif. 57:95–100. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lee JH, Kim JH, Hwang SW, Lee WJ, Yoon HK, Lee HS and Hong SS: High-level expression of antimicrobial peptide mediated by a fusion partner reinforcing formation of inclusion bodies. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 277:575–580. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schägger H and von Jagow G: Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem. 166:368–379. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lehrer RI, Rosenman M, Harwig SS, Jackson R and Eisenhauer P: Ultrasensitive assays for endogenous antimicrobial polypeptides. J Immunol Methods. 137:167–173. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Selvakumaran M, Pisarcik DA, Bao R, Yeung AT and Hamilton TC: Enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity by disturbing the nucleotide excision repair pathway in ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 63:1311–1316. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Capone R, Mustata M, Jang H, Arce FT, Nussinov R and Lal R: Antimicrobial protegrin-1 forms ion channels: molecular dynamic simulation, atomic force microscopy, and electrical conductance studies. Biophys J. 98:2644–2652. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Langham AA, Khandelia H, Schuster B, Waring AJ, Lehrer RI and Kaznessis YN: Correlation between simulated physicochemical properties and hemolycity of protegrin-like antimicrobial peptides: predicting experimental toxicity. Peptides. 29:1085–1093. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang H, Ma B, Lal R and Nussinov R: Models of toxic beta-sheet channels of protegrin-1 suggest a common subunit organization motif shared with toxic alzheimer beta-amyloid ion channels. Biophys J. 95:4631–4642. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bolintineanu D, Hazrati E, Davis HT, Lehrer RI and Kaznessis YN: Antimicrobial mechanism of pore-forming protegrin peptides: 100 pores to kill E. coli. Peptides. 31:1–8. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Kant P, Liu WZ and Pauls KP: PDC1, a corn defensin peptide expressed in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris inhibits growth of Fusarium graminearum. Peptides. 30:1593–1599. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Moy A, Sohal K, Dam C, Kuo P, Whittaker J, Whittaker M, Düzgünes N, Konopka K, Franz AH, Lin-Cereghino J and Lin-Cereghino GP: Expression and characterization of recombinant human secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) protein from Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif. 67:175–181. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pokoj S, Lauer I, Fötisch K, Himly M, Mari A, Enrique E, del Miguel-Moncin MM, Lidholm J, Vieths S and Scheurer S: Pichia pastoris is superior to E. coli for the production of recombinant allergenic non-specific lipid-transfer proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 69:68–75. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar |