Anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with crosstalk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and the vitamin D receptor in human monocytes

  • Authors:
    • Mengxue Yang
    • Bo Yang
    • Hua Gan
    • Xianwen Li
    • Jie Xu
    • Jie Yu
    • Lin Gao
    • Fengping Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 2, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2321
  • Pages: 1739-1744
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

1,25‑Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25‑(OH)2D3) has an anti‑inflammatory effect on human monocytes incubated with sera from patients with type 2 diabetes/diabetic nephropathy; however, the detailed mechanism behind the effect remains to be explored. The current study further validated the effects of 1,25‑(OH)2D3 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) + human recombinant interleukin (IL)‑15 on the expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (p‑STAT5) in human monocytes and explored the possible interaction between VDR and p‑STAT5. Synchronized THP‑1 cells were divided into pre‑intervened groups, namely the control, LPS + IL‑15 and 1,25‑(OH)2D3, groups, according to their differing treatments. The expression of STAT5 and p‑STAT5 was evaluated by western blot analysis; the concentration of IL‑6 in the supernatant was determined using an enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay; the expression of cytoskeletal proteins was observed using immunofluorescence and laser confocal microscopy; and the possible intranuclear interaction between VDR and p‑STAT5 was investigated using immunofluorescence, immuno‑coprecipitation and western blot analysis. LPS + IL‑15 upregulated p‑STAT5 expression and the IL‑6 level (P<0.05), with cytoskeletal rearrangement. These effects were partially prevented through pretreatment with 1,25‑(OH)2D3. The LPS + IL‑15 group and the 1,25‑(OH)2D3 group exhibited an interaction between p‑STAT5 and VDR in the nucleus, with the latter group showing a significant increase compared with the former (P<0.05). The immuno‑coprecipitation results provided evidence of the interaction between VDR and p‑STAT5, which suggests the existence of STAT5‑VDR crosstalk in THP‑1 monocytes. Cytoskeletal rearrangement, VDR and p‑STAT5 potentially have interactions in THP‑1 monocytes. The anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑(OH)2D3 may be associated with crosstalk between STAT5 and VDR, which further induces cytoskeletal rearrangement.
View Figures
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2015
Volume 9 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yang M, Yang B, Gan H, Li X, Xu J, Yu J, Gao L and Li F: Anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with crosstalk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and the vitamin D receptor in human monocytes. Exp Ther Med 9: 1739-1744, 2015.
APA
Yang, M., Yang, B., Gan, H., Li, X., Xu, J., Yu, J. ... Li, F. (2015). Anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with crosstalk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and the vitamin D receptor in human monocytes. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 9, 1739-1744. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2321
MLA
Yang, M., Yang, B., Gan, H., Li, X., Xu, J., Yu, J., Gao, L., Li, F."Anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with crosstalk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and the vitamin D receptor in human monocytes". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9.5 (2015): 1739-1744.
Chicago
Yang, M., Yang, B., Gan, H., Li, X., Xu, J., Yu, J., Gao, L., Li, F."Anti‑inflammatory effect of 1,25‑dihydroxyvitamin D3 is associated with crosstalk between signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 and the vitamin D receptor in human monocytes". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 9, no. 5 (2015): 1739-1744. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2321