How pH is regulated during amelogenesis in dental fluorosis (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 11, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6728
- Pages: 3759-3765
Abstract
Introduction
Dental fluorosis is an enamel defect caused by the excessive intake of fluoride during enamel formation. In deciduous teeth, it occurs during the embryonic phase, while in permanent teeth, it occurs primarily in children aged 2–8 years old (1–4). The primary sources of fluoride intake are from food and water, as well as from toothpaste, which contains added fluoride. Fluoride is also being added to different materials, including fluoride varnish, fluoride foam and dental resin to prevent the occurrence of dental caries. All these methods increase the morbidity of dental fluorosis (1). The incidence of dental fluorosis is currently a problem worldwide, although the prevalence of dental fluorosis varies in different countries. In the USA, ~25% of the population have dental fluorosis and its incidence is also high in China, ~11.7% of adolescents of 12 years old suffer dental fluorosis (2,4). According to the Dean's index, dental fluorosis may be classified into five types: Questionable, very mild, mild, moderate and severe (5). In clinical practice, dental fluorosis may be classified into three types: Chalk, discoloration and defective (6).
Enamel formation by ameloblasts is a complex process. The primary elements of enamel hydroxyapatite are present in the crystalline form (7,8). It has been demonstrated that 8–14 H+ are released in the extracellular environment as the minimum repeating structure of hydroxyapatite crystals are formed, thus lowering the pH (7–9). To maintain the pH balance, ameloblasts must buffer the protons. During the secretory stage, amelogenins may serve an important role in buffering the pH (9,10); however, during the maturation stage, ameloblasts secrete bicarbonate into the enamel matrix to neutralize the microenvironment (7,9–11). The process of enamel formation requires strict control of extracellular pH (7–9,11); hydroxyapatite crystal growth and proteinase activity in the extracellular space are pH-dependent phenomena (7,8,12). pH therefore serves an important role during amelogenesis, which is the basis of enamel formation.
The current review discusses the regulation of pH during amelogenesis in dental fluorosis and also explores the effects of changes in ion transporters on dental fluorosis. This may identify future directions of research to identify potential novel treatments of dental fluorosis.
Mechanism of dental fluorosis
There are multiple potential causes of dental fluorosis; however, the precise mechanism by which dental fluorosis occurs remain controversial (13–15). Current investigations into these mechanisms primarily focus on the direct effects on the ameloblasts and the indirect effects on the forming matrix (16). Fluoride has three distinct effects on ameloblasts. Firstly, it has two contrasting effects on cell proliferation. Micromolar F− promotes the proliferation of ameloblasts, while millimolar F− inhibits their proliferation, suggesting that higher levels of fluoride may inhibit the proliferation of ameloblasts (17,18). Secondly, the differentiation of ameloblasts may be regulated by F− via the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway (19). Thirdly, the apoptosis of ameloblasts increases during oxidative stress if F− levels are high (20). Yang et al (21) demonstrated that high levels of fluoride induce the apoptosis of ameloblasts by downregulating Bcl-2. In terms of indirect fluoride-associated effects, fluoride may interfere with the synthesis, secretion and intracellular transportation of enamel matrix proteins in ameloblasts (18,22). The retention of matrix proteins is not only the result of the decreased activity of proteases, including matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP-20) (23) and Kallikrein 4 (KLK4) (24), but is also the result of more effective binding to fluoridated apatite (1,13). Furthermore, high levels of fluoride may induce changes the structure and function of amelogenin, which serves an important role in buffering pH, thereby contributing to the disruption of pH regulation (25). pH is important in the mechanisms mentioned above and pH may directly or indirectly regulatet these mechanisms. Duan et al (26) identified that residual protein (emdogain) exists in the enamel of patients with cystic fibrosis and dental fluorosis. This was determined to be a consequence of disordered pH levels, which lead to abnormal proteolytic activity and defective endocytosis. Thus, pH serves an important role during the entire process of amelogenesis. It is therefore important to determine how pH is regulated during amelogenesis when intake of fluoride remains high for a prolonged period of time.
Amelogenesis and the regulation of pH
There are five stages of amelogenesis, which include: The pre-ameloblast stage, the pre-secretory stage, the secretory stage, the transition stage and the maturation stage (25,27). Of these five stages, two are the most important: The secretory and the maturation stages (4,28). During the secretory stage, ameloblasts secrete a number of proteins, including amelogenin, ameloblastin, enamelin and MMP20 (29,30). These proteins organize the nascent structure of ameloblasts, which are composed of long thin crystal ribbons (29). During the secretory stage, ameloblasts construct the full length of the enamel ribbons; however, this matrix remains only partly mineralized until the maturation stage (29,31,32). During this stage, the extracellular pH is ~7.23 (9,29,33). During the maturation stage, matrix proteins are degraded by a stage-specific protease and crystals develop into their final hardened forms (4,7,28). This stage-specific protease is KLK4, which can degrade matrix proteins and facilitate their resorption (4,34). In addition, high numbers of calcium and phosphate ions are secreted into the enamel matrix (30). This allows enamel ribbons to widen, leading to increased hydrogen release (7,29). During the efflux of calcium and phosphate ions, hydroxyapatite (HA) may be deposited. At the same time with HA deposition, hydrogen ions are released, lowering the pH of the enamel matrix (33). Depending on the phosphate precursor, the precipitation of HA releases 8–14 moles of hydrogen ions per mole of HA, which acidifies the enamel matrix (4,10,29,35). At this stage, extracellular pH may decrease to <6.0 (9,29,33).
However, pH levels may vary during the maturation stage. Due to cyclic oscillations of ameloblasts between the smooth-ended (SE) and ruffle-ended (RE) forms, the pH in the enamel matrix periodically fluctuates between neutral (pH 7.2) and acidic (pH 5.8) (7,11,30,36).
To ensure that pH levels change as required during the different stages, an effective pH regulation mechanism is required. The primary extracellular buffering mechanism used by ameloblasts is the bicarbonate buffer system (7,9–11), particularly during the maturation stage (9,37). During amelogenesis, ameloblasts secrete bicarbonate into the enamel matrix to buffer the protons produced by the growth of hydroxyapatite crystals. During the maturation of enamel, carbonic anhydrase type VI, which is a secreted type of carbonic anhydrase, may catalyze the formation of CO2 and H2O from carbonic acid, formed by bicarbonate buffering of the protons in the enamel space (9,38). Furthermore, Sasaki et al (11) suggested that an acidic pH in RE ameloblasts may be due to the release of protons, which may contribute to pH regulation. Due to the transportation of protons and bicarbonate, the balance between the intra- and extracellular pH of ameloblasts may be maintained.
Electrolyte transport processes involved in pH regulation during amelogenesis
The transport of ions in and out of cells occurs in two ways, active transport and passive diffusion, and this is also the case in ameloblasts. Ion transporters participate in this process. Ions associated with amelogenesis predominantly include calcium, phosphonium, chloridion, protons and bicarbonate, and primarily rely on ion transporters to enter and leave ameloblasts. Previous studies have demonstrated that there are many ion transporters on the membrane of ameloblasts, including Caγ1, inwardly rectifying potassium channel (Kir1.1), epithelial sodium channel, anion exchange protein (AE)1, AE2, electrogenic sodium biocarbonate cotransporter (NBC)1, NBCe1, sodium-calcium exchanger 1–3, sodium-hydrogen antiporter 1 (NHE-1), sodium/potassium/calcium exchanger 4, H+-adenosine triphosphate (ATP)ase, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), H/Cl exchange transporter (ClC)-3, ClC-5, ClC-7, gap junction α-1 protein (Cx43) and PAT-1 (16,30,36,39–51). Among these ion transporters, some are responsible for regulating pH and include ClC-5, ClC-7, CFTR, NHE-1, NBCe1, AE1, AE2 and pendrin. As aforementioned, the formation of hydroxyapatite during the maturation stage of amelogenesis generates a large quantity of protons; to sustain the growth of crystals, these protons must be neutralized (7,42,52), potentially via the secretion of neutralizing ions, such as bicarbonate (30).
CFTR serves an important role in transporting bicarbonate into the enamel space to buffer protons in ameloblasts and locates on the apical plasma membrane during the maturation stage of ameloblasts (52). Paine et al (8) demonstrated that bicarbonate was transported by apical AE2a, basolateral NBCe1 and apical CFTR. Furthermore, previous studies have identified that CFTR is a critical factor in the regulation of pH during the maturation of ameloblasts and is essential for enamel mineralization (52–54). Duan et al (26) demonstrated that CFTR inhibition and treatment with CFTR siRNA may increase intracellular pH. Sui et al (53) placed incisors taken from mice with the cystic fibrosis gene knocked out in pH indicator solution and indicated that they were acidic. CFTR is a classical Cl− channel and transports bicarbonate in two main ways, accompanied by the transportation of chloride. CFTR stimulates the transport activity of Slc26a members, leading to bicarbonate efflux (54–56). Additionally, CFTR is permeable to bicarbonate (54,57,58). Although the results of previous studies have indicated that CFTR is more permeable to Cl− than to bicarbonate, studies have revealed that CFTR may be responsible for >50% of the total bicarbonate efflux in pancreatic duct cells (54,57).
Solute carrier (SLC) 4 bicarbonate transporters serve an important role in the transport of bicarbonate and the regulation of pH in different types of cells (8,59). SLC4A2 codes for AE2, an anion-exchanger; whereas SLC4A4 codes for NBCe1, a bidirectionally electrogenic transmembrane ion-transporter (60). Depending on different cell types, NBCe1 is able to co-transport two or three bicarbonate ions per Na+ ion (60). However, the location of AE2 and NBCe1 remains controversial. Paine et al (8) and Lacruz et al (43) indicated that NBCe1 is located on the basolateral membrane and AE2 is located on the apical plasma membrane. However, Bronckers et al (61) demonstrated that AE2 is located on the basolateral membrane and that NBCe1 is located in the papillary layer cells of the enamel organ. The difference between these studies may be due to the different methods employed and the different age groups of the animals in each of the studies (49). Overall, it is considered that, following basolateral bicarbonate uptake by NBCe1 and AE2, apical bicarbonate secretion is mediated by CFTR (62). Gawenis et al (63) demonstrated that mice lacking AE2 were edentulous (63). Additionally, patients harboring NBCe1 mutations exhibit different levels of enamel abnormalities (64,65). These results all confirm the important role of AE2 and NBCe1 in the transport of bicarbonate in ameloblasts and in regulating pH levels (8).
Pendrin is another member of SLC family, which is encoded by SLC26A4 located on the apical membrane of ameloblasts (45). It is able to transport chloride, bicarbonate, iodine and formate (45). A number of studies have demonstrated that it is able to regulate luminal pH in the kidney, inner ear and thyroid (66–68). However, the transport of bicarbonate by pendrin is not critical for enamel formation. Bronckers et al (45) identified that ameloblasts may achieve the normal mineralization of enamel in pendrin knockout rodents.
ClC-5 and ClC-7 are voltage-gated chloride channels, which are responsible for transporting Cl− and H+. Previous studies have generally focused on the regulation of dentin development by ClC-5 (41,69). Duan et al (70) demonstrated that ClC-5 is also expressed by ameloblasts of tooth germ. The enamel of ClC-5 knockout mice is easily detached from dentin and this may affect enamel formation (41,70). ClC-7 is a Cl−/ H+ antiporter (71,72). It has been proven that, during the maturation stage of ameloblasts, the highest levels of ClC-7 are immunolocated in ameloblast vesicles (48,71,72). Osteopetrosis-associated transmembrane protein 1, which centralizes to the lysosomes of all cells and lies on the ruffled border membrane of osteoclasts, is essential for the transport activity of ClC-7 (71–74). In osteoclasts, Kornak et al (74) demonstrated that ClC-7 was important for the acidification of the resorption lacuna; however, this was not the case in lysosomes. The lysosomal pH and degree of enamel mineralization did not change following ClC-7 knockout (71,75,76). However, ClC-7 may serve an important role during tooth eruption, as it has been determined that ClC-7 knockout mice experience a failure of tooth eruption (71,74,75,77); however, further studies are required to explore the exact mechanism of action. Thus, unlike its function in osteoclasts, ClC-7 is not critical for ameloblast function (71).
NHE1 is a Na+/H+ exchanger located on basolateral membrane of ameloblasts and is strongly immunoactivated in the secretory and maturation stages of amelogenesis (42). It co-operates with other transporters to transport H+ to the enamel matrix, thus altering pH. Carbonic anhydrase (CA) is a zinc metalloenzyme required for the survival of pro- and eukaryotic cells (38,78). It is able to catalyze the reaction of carbon dioxide and water to produce carbonic acid, which then rapidly dissociates into hydrogen and bicarbonate ions (38,78,79). Among >12 CA genes, it has been proven that CA II and CA VI are expressed in maturation ameloblasts (38,78,79). CA II is the most abundantly expressed isozyme in all major mammalian organs and is localized in the cytoplasm. It can pump H+ into the enamel with the aid of H+-ATPase type V (80). CA VI is a secreted enzyme located in the enamel, which buffers local pH by providing bicarbonate ions or recycling excess carbonic acid (38,78). Generally speaking, CA II and CA VI participate in the pH homeostasis of ameloblasts by transporting H+ and HCO3−.
The effect of fluoride on pH regulation during amelogenesis
Excessive fluoride may cause pH disturbance during amelogenesis. As the pH balance is primarily maintained by electrolyte transporters, fluoride may serve a role during electrolyte transportation. Zheng et al (25) demonstrated that fluoride may indirectly regulate ameloblasts in mice and humans. The upregulation of NBCe1 during ameloblast maturation is not directly stimulated by fluoride, as NBCe1 expression is unaffected following the addition of fluoride. The exact mechanism of action of NBCe1 upregulation may be due to mineral deposition and matrix acidification (25). Paine et al (8) demonstrated that AE2 and NBCe1 expression is upregulated when pH levels are low. A previous study investigating the association between microRNA (miRNA) 224 expression and acidification indicated that acidification caused by fluoride may downregulate miRNA 224 expression (81). Furthermore, miRNA 224 expression was inversely correlated with the expression of SLC4A4 and CFTR (81). Further studies are required to investigate the direct effect of fluoride on their expression.
The effect of fluoride on pH regulation has been verified. A number of in vitro and in vivo studies have proven that F− is able to accelerate crystal formation and induce hypermineralized lines in secretory enamel (6,61,82). The process of crystal growth produces a large number of protons, which can acidify the microenvironment. A decreased pH may induce a series of changes in electrolyte transporters and may also affect the toxicity of F− (4,8,25,29). F− cannot enter the ameloblast directly and must be converted to hydrogen fluoride (HF) beforehand (4). A low extracellular pH promotes this conversion; >25 times HF is formed at pH 6.0 compared with at pH 7.4, as determined by the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation (4,29). Due to the concentration gradient of pH, HF can diffuse easily into the cytoplasm from the enamel matrix and revert to F− in the neutral cytoplasm; it cannot consequently easily diffuse out of the cell (4,29,83,84). Increased F− concentration in the cytoplasm can induce oxidative stress by reducing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, which affects a variety of structures and processes of normal cells due to reactive oxygen species accumulation (4,85–87). Furthermore, fluoride ions in the cytoplasm may induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, including the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2, which may result in a decrease of overall protein production, including secretion of the protease KLK4 (4,29,88,89). Thus, F− induces more severe toxicity in ameloblasts undergoing maturation (90–92).
Based on the acidic hypothesis of F− and the pH regulation in amelogenesis, the current review hypothesizes that F− is associated with pH regulation during amelogenesis. F− accelerates crystal formation in ameloblasts in two different ways (Fig. 1). Firstly, it stimulates the release of protons and lowers the pH of the cell microenvironment. This upregulates the expression of ion transporters, which transport H+ and HCO3−. Yet through this complicated regulation of H+ and HCO3− in and out of ameloblasts by different ion transporters mentioned above, the net efflux of HCO3− exceeds H+. Secondly, it triggers unknown signaling pathways and upregulates bicarbonate transporters, including NBCe1, AE2, CA2, CA6, CFTR. Upregulated bicarbonate transporters release a large amount of bicarbonate from the ameloblasts, which may neutralize the pH to form a microenvironment that favors crystal nucleation. By contrast, following a decrease in the pH, more F− diffuses into cytoplasm of amelobalsts along the concentration gradient formed by the release of protons. The retention of F− induces a series of pathological changes, including oxidative and ER stress. Under the buffering capacity of ameloblasts facing F− toxicity, normal mineralization occurs; however, if the buffering capacity of ameloblasts is overwhelmed by excessive F−, hypomineralization occurs, which may cause dental fluorosis. Further studies are required to investigate the signaling pathways involved and the exact process by which ions are transported.
Conclusions
Amelogenesis is a complicated process that involves crystal formation, the removal of matrix proteins and ions transportation. The pH of the enamel matrix fluctuates during different stages of ameloblast development. Under normal conditions, pH levels are regulated and ameloblasts may perform their normal function and stimulate normal mineralization. CFTR, AE2, NBCe1, ClC-5, ClC-7, NHE1, CA2, CA6 and H+-ATPase type V are all involved in the regulation of pH. However, under high fluoride concentrations, pH regulation becomes dysregulated. This causes the malfunction of ameloblasts, resulting in hypomineralization and dental fluorosis. The effect of fluoride on ameloblasts is due to its impact on electrolyte transporters and its direct diffusion into the cytoplasm in an acidic environment.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The current review was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (grant no. ZR2014HQ067).
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
This review is the result of joint efforts. DZ designed the study, MJ was responsible for writing the manuscript, LXu constructed the figure, LXia analyzed and summarized the literature. SH helped with analysis of the literature, assisted in providing constructive discussions and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approve the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Aoba T and Fejerskov O: Dental fluorosis: Chemistry and biology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 13:155–170. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Barker L and Dye BA: Prevalence and severity of dental fluorosis in the United States, 1999–2004. NCHS Data Brief. 1–8. 2010. | |
Denbesten P and Li W: Chronic fluoride toxicity: Dental fluorosis. Monogr Oral Sci. 22:81–96. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sierant ML and Bartlett JD: Stress response pathways in ameloblasts: Implications for amelogenesis and dental fluorosis. Cells. 1:631–645. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mohamed AR, Thomson WM and Mackay TD: An epidemiological comparison of Dean's index and the developmental defects of enamel (DDE) index. J Public Health Dent. 70:344–347. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lyaruu DM, Medina JF, Sarvide S, Bervoets TJ, Everts V, Denbesten PK, Smith CE and Bronckers AL: Barrier formation: Potential molecular mechanism of enamel fluorosis. J Dent Res. 93:94–102. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Smith CE: Cellular and chemical events during enamel maturation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 9:128–161. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Paine ML, Snead ML, Wang HJ, Abuladze N, Pushkin A, Liu W, Kao LY, Wall SM, Kim YH and Kurtz I: Role of NBCe1 and AE2 in secretory ameloblasts. J Dent Res. 87:391–395. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lacruz RS, Nanci A, Kurtz I, Wright JT and Paine ML: Regulation of pH during amelogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int. 86:91–103. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simmer JP and Fincham AG: Molecular mechanisms of dental enamel formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 6:84–108. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sasaki S, Takagi T and Suzuki M: Cyclical changes in pH in bovine developing enamel as sequential bands. Arch Oral Biol. 36:227–231. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takagi T, Ogasawara T, Tagami J, Akao M, Kuboki Y, Nagai N and LeGeros RZ: pH and carbonate levels in developing enamel. Connect Tissue Res. 38:181–205. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bawden JW, Crenshaw MA, Wright JT and LeGeros RZ: Consideration of possible biologic mechanisms of fluorosis. J Dent Res. 74:1349–1352. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Robinson C, Connell S and Kirkham J: Dental enamel-a biological ceramic: Regular substructures in enamel hydroxyapatite crystals revealed by atomic force microscopy. J Mater Chem. 14:2242–2248. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Robinson C, Connell S, Kirkham J, Brookes SJ, Shore RC and Smith AM: The effect of fluoride on the developing tooth. Caries Res. 38:268–276. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM and DenBesten PK: The impact of fluoride on ameloblasts and the mechanisms of enamel fluorosis. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 88:877–893. 2009. | |
Yan Q, Zhang Y, Li W and Denbesten PK: Micromolar fluoride alters ameloblast lineage cells in vitro. J Dent Res. 86:336–340. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei W, Gao Y, Wang C, Zhao L and Sun D: Excessive fluoride induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and interferes enamel proteinases secretion. Environ Toxicol. 28:332–341. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Y, Li W, Chi HS, Chen J and Denbesten PK: JNK/c-Jun signaling pathway mediates the fluoride-induced down-regulation of MMP-20 in vitro. Matrix Biol. 26:633–641. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jacinto-Alemán LF, Hernández-Guerrero JC, Trejo-Solís C, Jiménez-Farfán MD and Fernández-Presas AM: In vitro effect of sodium fluoride on antioxidative enzymes and apoptosis during murine odontogenesis. J Oral Pathol Med. 39:709–714. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang T, Zhang Y, Li Y, Hao Y, Zhou M, Dong N and Duan X: High amounts of fluoride induce apoptosis/cell death in matured ameloblast-like LS8 cells by downregulating Bcl-2. Arch Oral Biol. 58:1165–1173. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matsuo S, Inai T, Kurisu K, Kiyomiya K and Kurebe M: Influence of fluoride on secretory pathway of the secretory ameloblast in rat incisor tooth germs exposed to sodium fluoride. Arch Toxicol. 70:420–429. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hannas AR, Pereira JC, Granjeiro JM and Tjäderhane L: The role of matrix metalloproteinases in the oral environment. Acta Odontol Scand. 65:1–13. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Denbesten PK and Heffernan LM: Enamel proteases in secretory and maturation enamel of rats ingesting 0 and 100 PPM fluoride in drinking water. Adv Dent Res. 3:199–202. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zheng L, Zhang Y, He P, Kim J, Schneider R, Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM and DenBesten PK: NBCe1 in mouse and human ameloblasts may be indirectly regulated by fluoride. J Dent Res. 90:782–787. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duan X, Mao Y, Wen X, Yang T and Xue Y: Excess fluoride interferes with chloride-channel-dependent endocytosis in ameloblasts. J Dent Res. 90:175–180. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nanci A: Ten Cate's oral histology: Development, structure, and function. Ebook, MosbyElsevier. 1–432. 2007. | |
Hu JC, Chun YH, Al Hazzazzi T and Simmer JP: Enamel formation and amelogenesis imperfecta. Cells Tissues Organs. 186:78–85. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sharma R, Tsuchiya M, Skobe Z, Tannous BA and Bartlett JD: The acid test of fluoride: How pH modulates toxicity. PLoS One. 5:e108952010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varga G, Kerémi B, Bori E and Földes A: Function and repair of dental enamel-potential role of epithelial transport processes of ameloblasts. Pancreatology. 15 Suppl 4:S55–S60. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nanci A and Smith CE: Development and calcification of enamel. Calcification in biological systems. 313–343. 1992. | |
Bartlett JD and Simmer JP: Proteinases in developing dental enamel. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 10:425–441. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith CE, Issid M, Margolis HC and Moreno EC: Developmental changes in the pH of enamel fluid and its effects on matrix-resident proteinases. Adv Dent Res. 10:159–169. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Simmer JP, Fukae M, Tanabe T, Yamakoshi Y, Uchida T, Xue J, Margolis HC, Shimizu M, DeHart BC, Hu CC and Bartlett JD: Purification, characterization, and cloning of enamel matrix serine proteinase 1. J Dent Res. 77:377–386. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith CE, Chong DL, Bartlett JD and Margolis HC: Mineral acquisition rates in developing enamel on maxillary and mandibular incisors of rats and mice: Implications to extracellular acid loading as apatite crystals mature. J Bone Miner Res. 20:240–249. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Damkier HH, Josephsen K, Takano Y, Zahn D, Fejerskov O and Frische S: Fluctuations in surface pH of maturing rat incisor enamel are a result of cycles of H(+)-secretion by ameloblasts and variations in enamel buffer characteristics. Bone. 60:227–234. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Guo J, Bijvelds MJ, Bervoets TJ, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Medina JF, Li Z, Zhang Y and DenBesten PK: Composition of mineralizing incisor enamel in CFTR-deficient mice. Eur J Oral Sci. 123:9–16. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith CE, Nanci A and Moffat P: Evidence by signal peptide trap technology for the expression of carbonic anhydrase 6 in rat incisor enamel organs. Eur J Oral Sci. 114 Suppl 1:(S147): S153 Discussion 164–165. 380–381. 2006. | |
Hou J, Situ Z and Duan X: ClC chloride channels in tooth germ and odontoblast-like MDPC-23 cells. Arch Oral Biol. 53:874–878. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Su X, Yang F, Duan X, Yuan L, Li Y and Wu L: Expression of CLC-7 during mouse tooth development. J Pract Stomatol. 24:342–345. 2008.(In Chinese). | |
Duan X, Mao Y, Yang T, Wen X, Wang H, Hou J, Xue Y and Zhang R: ClC-5 regulates dentin development through TGF-beta1 pathway. Arch Oral Biol. 54:1118–1124. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Josephsen K, Takano Y, Frische S, Praetorius J, Nielsen S, Aoba T and Fejerskov O: Ion transporters in secretory and cyclically modulating ameloblasts: A new hypothesis for cellular control of preeruptive enamel maturation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 299:C1299–C1307. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lacruz RS, Nanci A, White SN, Wen X, Wang H, Zalzal SF, Luong VQ, Schuetter VL, Conti PS, Kurtz I and Paine ML: The sodium bicarbonate cotransporter (NBCe1) is essential for normal development of mouse dentition. J Biol Chem. 285:24432–24438. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Okumura R, Shibukawa Y, Muramatsu T, Hashimoto S, Nakagawa K, Tazaki M and Shimono M: Sodium-calcium exchangers in rat ameloblasts. J Pharmacol Sci. 112:223–230. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Li X, Wangemann P and DenBesten P: Developmental expression of SLC26A4 (Pendrin) during amelogenesis in developing rodent teeth. Eur J Oral Sci. 119 Suppl 1:S185–S192. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hu P, Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Smith SM, Kurtz I and Paine ML: Expression of the sodium/calcium/potassium exchanger, NCKX4, in ameloblasts. Cells Tissues Organs. 196:501–509. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Moffatt P, Chang EH, Bromage TG, Bringas P Jr, Nanci A, Baniwal SK, Zabner J, Welsh MJ, et al: Requirements for ion and solute transport, and pH regulation during enamel maturation. J Cell Physiol. 227:1776–1785. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lacruz RS, Brookes SJ, Wen X, Jimenez JM, Vikman S, Hu P, White SN, Lyngstadaas SP, Okamoto CT, Smith CE and Paine ML: Adaptor protein complex 2 (ap-2) mediated, clathrin dependent endocytosis, and related gene activities, are a prominent feature during maturation stage amelogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 28:672–687. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lacruz RS, Smith CE, Kurtz I, Hubbard MJ and Paine ML: New paradigms on the transport functions of maturation-stage ameloblasts. J Dent Res. 92:122–129. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duan X: Ion channels, channelopathies, and tooth formation. J Dent Res. 93:117–125. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Lyaruu D, Jalali R, Medina JF, Zandieh-Doulabi B and DenBesten PK: Ameloblast modulation and transport of Cl-, Na+, and K+ during amelogenesis. J Dent Res. 94:1740–1747. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wright JT, Kiefer CL, Hall KI and Grubb BR: Abnormal enamel development in a cystic fibrosis transgenic mouse model. J Dent Res. 75:966–973. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sui W, Boyd C and Wright JT: Altered pH regulation during enamel development in the cystic fibrosis mouse incisor. J Dent Res. 82:388–392. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Kalogeraki L, Jorna HJ, Wilke M, Bervoets TJ, Lyaruu DM, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Denbesten PK and de Jonge H: The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is expressed in maturation stage ameloblasts, odontoblasts and bone cells. Bone. 46:1188–1196. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ko SB, Zeng W, Dorwart MR, Luo X, Kim KH, Millen L, Goto H, Naruse S, Soyombo A, Thomas PJ and Muallem S: Gating of CFTR by the STAS domain of SLC26 transporters. Nat Cell Biol. 6:343–350. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mount DB and Romero MF: The SLC26 gene family of multifunctional anion exchangers. Pflugers Arch. 447:710–721. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishiguro H, Steward MC, Naruse S, Ko SB, Goto H, Case RM, Kondo T and Yamamoto A: CFTR functions as a bicarbonate channel in pancreatic duct cells. J Gen Physiol. 133:315–326. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shcheynikov N, Kim KH, Kim KM, Dorwart MR, Ko SB, Goto H, Naruse S, Thomas PJ and Muallem S: Dynamic control of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator Cl(−)/HCO3(−) selectivity by external Cl(−). J Biol Chem. 279:21857–21865. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pushkin A and Kurtz I: SLC4 base (HCO3−, CO32−) transporters: Classification function, structure, genetic diseases, and knockout models. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 290:F580–F599. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jalali R, Guo J, Zandieh-Doulabi B, Bervoets TJ, Paine ML, Boron WF, Parker MD, Bijvelds MJ, Medina JF, DenBesten PK and Bronckers AL: NBCe1 (SLC4A4) a potential pH regulator in enamel organ cells during enamel development in the mouse. Cell Tissue Res. 358:433–442. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Jansen ID, Medina JF, Kellokumpu S, Hoeben KA, Gawenis LR, Oude-Elferink RP and Everts V: Localization and function of the anion exchanger Ae2 in developing teeth and orofacial bone in rodents. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 312B:1–387. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Arquitt CK, Boyd C and Wright JT: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene (CFTR) is associated with abnormal enamel formation. J Dent Res. 81:492–496. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gawenis LR, Ledoussal C, Judd LM, Prasad V, Alper SL, Stuart-Tilley A, Woo AL, Grisham C, Sanford LP, Doetschman T, et al: Mice with a targeted disruption of the AE2 Cl-/HCO3- exchanger are achlorhydric. J Biol Chem. 279:30531–30539. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dinour D, Chang MH, Satoh J, Smith BL, Angle N, Knecht A, Serban I, Holtzman EJ and Romero MF: A novel missense mutation in the sodium bicarbonate cotransporter (NBCe1/SLC4A4) causes proximal tubular acidosis and glaucoma through ion transport defects. J Biol Chem. 279:52238–52246. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Inatomi J, Horita H, Braverman N, Sekine T, Yamada H, Suzuki Y, Kawahara K, Moriyama N, Kudo A, Kawakami H, et al: Mutational and functional analysis of SLC4A4 in a patient with proximal renal tubular acidosis. Pflugers Arch. 448:438–444. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Royaux IE, Belyantseva IA, Wu T, Kachar B, Everett LA, Marcus DC and Green ED: Localization and functional studies of pendrin in the mouse inner ear provide insight about the etiology of deafness in pendred syndrome. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 4:394–404. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wall SM, Hassell KA, Royaux IE, Green ED, Chang JY, Shipley GL and Verlander JW: Localization of pendrin in mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 284:F229–F241. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wangemann P, Kim HM, Billings S, Nakaya K, Li X, Singh R, Sharlin DS, Forrest D, Marcus DC and Fong P: Developmental delays consistent with cochlear hypothyroidism contribute to failure to develop hearing in mice lacking Slc26a4/pendrin expression. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 297:F1435–F1447. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang SS, Devuyst O, Courtoy PJ, Wang XT, Wang H, Wang Y, Thakker RV, Guggino S and Guggino WB: Mice lacking renal chloride channel, CLC-5, are a model for Dent's disease, a nephrolithiasis disorder associated with defective receptormediated endocytosis. Hum Mol Genet. 9:2937–2945. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duan X: Spatial-temporal distribution of CLC-5 in rat tooth germ development. J Dent Res. 83:27412004. | |
Guo J, Bervoets TJ, Henriksen K, Everts V and Bronckers AL: Null mutation of chloride channel 7 (Clcn7) impairs dental root formation but does not affect enamel mineralization. Cell Tissue Res. 363:361–370. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Leisle L, Ludwig CF, Wagner FA, Jentsch TJ and Stauber T: ClC-7 is a slowly voltage-gated 2Cl(−)/1H(+)-exchanger and requires Ostm1 for transport activity. EMBO J. 30:2140–2152. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lange PF, Wartosch L, Jentsch TJ and Fuhrmann JC: ClC-7 requires Ostm1 as a beta-subunit to support bone resorption and lysosomal function. Nature. 440:220–223. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kornak U, Kasper D, Bösl MR, Kaiser E, Schweizer M, Schulz A, Friedrich W, Delling G and Jentsch TJ: Loss of the ClC-7 chloride channel leads to osteopetrosis in mice and man. Cell. 104:205–215. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kasper D, Planells-Cases R, Fuhrmann JC, Scheel O, Zeitz O, Ruether K, Schmitt A, Poët M, Steinfeld R, Schweizer M, et al: Loss of the chloride channel ClC-7 leads to lysosomal storage disease and neurodegeneration. EMBO J. 24:1079–1091. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Steinberg BE, Huynh KK, Brodovitch A, Jabs S, Stauber T, Jentsch TJ and Grinstein S: A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification. J Cell Biol. 189:1171–1186. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wen X, Lacruz RS and Paine ML: Dental and cranial pathologies in mice lacking the Cl(−)/H(+)-exchanger ClC-7. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 298:1502–1508. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tripp BC, Smith K and Ferry JG: Carbonic anhydrae: New insights for an ancient enzyme. J Biol Chem. 276:48615–48618. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chegwidden WR and Carter ND: Introduction to the carbonic anhydrases. EXS. 90:14–28. 2000. | |
Lin HM, Nakamura H, Noda T and Ozawa H: Localization of H(+)-ATPase and carbonic anhydrase II in ameloblasts at maturation. Calcif Tissue Int. 55:38–45. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fan Y, Zhou Y, Zhou X, Sun F, Gao B, Wan M, Zhou X, Sun J, Xu X, Cheng L, et al: MicroRNA 224 regulates ion transporter expression in ameloblasts to coordinate enamel mineralization. Mol Cell Biol. 35:2875–2890. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brown WE, Edelman N and Tomzaic BB: Octacalcium phosphate as precursors in biomineral formation. Adv Dent Res. 1:306–313. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kawase T and Suzuki A: Studies on the transmembrane migration of fluoride and its effects on proliferation of L-929 fibroblasts (L cells) in vitro. Arch Oral Biol. 34:103–107. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He H, Ganapathy V, Isales CM and Whitford GM: pH-dependent fluoride transport in intestinal brush border membrane vesicles. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1372:244–254. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mittal M and Flora SJ: Effects of individual and combined exposure to sodium arsenite and sodium fluoride on tissue oxidative stress, arsenic and fluoride levels in male mice. Chem Biol Interact. 162:128–139. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin XQ, Xu H, Shi HY, Zhang JM and Zhang HQ: Fluoride-induced oxidative stress of osteoblasts and protective effects of baicalein against fluoride toxicity. Biol Trace Elem Res. 116:81–89. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varol E, Icli A, Aksoy F, Bas HA, Sutcu R, Ersoy IH, Varol S and Ozaydin M: Evaluation of total oxidative status and total antioxidant capacity in patients with endemic fluorosis. Toxicol Ind Health. 29:175–180. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sharma R, Tsuchiya M and Bartlett JD: Fluoride induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and inhibits protein synthesis and secretion. Environ Health Perspect. 116:1142–1146. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kubota K, Lee DH, Tsuchiya M, Young CS, Everett ET, Martinez-Mier EA, Snead ML, Nguyen L, Urano F and Bartlett JD: Fluoride induces endoplasmic reticulum stress in ameloblasts responsible for dental enamel formation. J Biol Chem. 280:23194–23202. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lyaruu DM, de Jong M, Bronckers AL and Wöltgens JH: Ultrastructure of in-vitro recovery of mineralization capacity of fluorotic enamel matrix in hamster tooth germs pre-exposed to fluoride in organ culture during the secretory phase of amelogenesis. Arch Oral Biol. 32:107–115. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith CE, Nanci A and Denbesten PK: Effects of chronic fluoride exposure on morphometric parameters defining the stages of amelogenesis and ameloblast modulation in rat incisors. Anat Rec. 237:243–258. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou R, Zaki AE and Eisenmann DR: Morphometry and autoradiography of altered rat enamel protein processing due to chronic exposure to fluoride. Arch Oral Biol. 41:739–747. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |