Impact of hemostatic methods on ovarian reserve and fertility in laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy
- Authors:
- Jie Xiao
- Jian Zhou
- Hui Liang
- Fumin Liu
- Chenchen Xu
- Li Liang
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Gynecology, Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, P.R. China, Cervical Disease Center, Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, P.R. China, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, P.R. China, B Ultrasonic Room, Xuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221009, P.R. China
- Published online on: February 12, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7259
-
Pages:
2689-2693
-
Copyright: © Xiao
et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
Impact of hemostatic methods, electrocoagulation versus suture, on ovarian reserve and fertility in laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy was investigated. Eighty patients with bilateral ovarian cysts who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy were randomly divided into 2 groups based on the hemostatic methods: 40 in suture group and another 40 in electrocoagulation group. Blood samples were drawn from all patients at roughly three time points: Before the surgery, 1 month and 6 months after the surgery. Radioimmunoassay was performed to measure the serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2) and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Moreover, the vaginal ultrasound examination was performed to obtain the ovarian size, peak systolic velocity (PSV) of ovarian stromal blood flow, and antral follicle count (AFC). In terms of postoperative ovarian reserve, the levels of E2 and AMH slightly decreased while the FSH level slightly increased in the suture group at both 1 and 6 months after surgery. In the electrocoagulation group, however, the levels of E2 and AMH decreased significantly while the FSH level increased significantly at 1 month after surgery. Six months after surgery, these levels all returned slightly showing some recovery of ovarian reserve. In comparison between the suture group and the electrocoagulation group, the differences in levels of E2, FSH and AMH were all statistically significant at both 1 and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05). Six months after surgery, the differences in AFC and PSV between the suture group and the electrocoagulation group were statistically significant (P<0.05). In laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, hemostatic electrocoagulation had a more negative impact on ovarian reserve than hemostatic suture. The use of electrocoagulation for hemostasis should be minimized during the operation, and the suture method should be adopted for hemostasis and shaping of the ovarian wound.
View References
1
|
Peters A, Rindos NB and Lee T: Hemostasis
during ovarian cystectomy: Systematic review of the impact of
suturing versus surgical energy on ovarian function. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 24:235–246. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
2
|
Alammari R, Lightfoot M and Hur HC: Impact
of cystectomy on ovarian reserve: Review of the literature. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol. 24:247–257. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
3
|
Kalme T, Seppälä M, Qiao Q, Koistinen R,
Nissinen A, Harrela M, Loukovaara M, Leinonen P and Tuomilehto J:
Sex hormone-binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor-binding
protein-1 as indicators of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular risk,
and mortality in elderly men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
90:1550–1556. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
4
|
Ashrafi M, Madani T, Tehranian AS and
Malekzadeh F: Follicle stimulating hormone as a predictor of
ovarian response in women undergoing controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation for IVF. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 91:53–57. 2005.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
5
|
Wang H, Chen H, Qin Y, Shi Z, Zhao X, Xu
J, Ma B and Chen ZJ: Risks associated with premature ovarian
failure in Han Chinese women. Reprod Biomed Online. 30:401–407.
2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
6
|
Pergialiotis V, Prodromidou A, Frountzas
M, Bitos K, Perrea D and Doumouchtsis SK: The effect of bipolar
electrocoagulation during ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve: A
systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 213:620–628. 2015.
View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
7
|
Morris RT, Gershenson DM, Silva EG, Follen
M, Morris M and Wharton JT: Outcome and reproductive function after
conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. Obstet Gynecol.
95:541–547. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
8
|
Ding Y, Yuan Y, Ding J, Chen Y, Zhang X
and Hua K: Comprehensive assessment of the impact of laparoscopic
ovarian cystectomy on ovarian reserve. J Minim Invasive Gynecol.
22:1252–1259. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
9
|
Yoon BS, Kim YS, Seong SJ, Song T, Kim ML,
Kim MK and Paek JY: Impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic
ovarian cystectomy with reduced port number: A randomized
controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 176:34–38.
2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|
10
|
Muzii L, Bianchi A and Crocè C: Manci N
and Panici PB: Laparoscopic excision of ovarian cysts: is the
stripping technique a tissue-sparing procedure? Fertil Steril.
77:609–614. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI
|