This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Damage to neurons or glial cells and demyelization after traumatic brain or spinal cord injuries, strokes and neurodegenerative diseases may lead to dysfunction of the nervous system. This phenomenon is linked with serious neurological deficits in patients. The strategies developed for treating injuries or diseases of the central nervous system include pharmacological neuroprotection and tissue engineering. In the latter method, living scaffolds composed of defined cells seeded on biomaterial are implanted to the site of injury (1–3). Several types of scaffolds are used for the treatment of nervous system injuries (1,3,4).

Scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix molecules are thought to be involved in the stimulation of neurogenesis (1,5), a process linked to the functional recovery of a damaged brain. Huang et al (2) report that the implantation of scaffolds containing collagen (Col) and glycosaminoglycans (GAG) provides a good microenvironment for neurogenesis. This data is supported by studies that show scaffolds composed of Col only or of Col with chondroitin sulphate (CS) constitute good environments for the entrapment and cultivation of embryonic nerve cells (6–9). Col scaffolds supplemented with GAG were found to decrease cell adhesion but increase the proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells (10). Expression of the α2β1 integrin was confirmed in mesenchymal stem cells seeded within the Col scaffold (11). This integrin is supposed to participate in the adhesion of the cell to Col fibers.

In the present study, three types of Col-based scaffolds were evaluated: Col sponges, bi-component Col-CS matrices crosslinked with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and Col sponges modified using 2,3 DAC. It has been shown that binary systems of collagen-chondroitin sulphate (Col-CS) and collagen-dialdehyde cellulose (Col-DAC) have the correct balance of properties to serve as a biomimetic niche: They accommodate human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-NPs) sustaining their ability to proliferate and differentiate into neural lineages (12).

The environments of these scaffolds allow the entrapment of nerve embryonic cells and increase their metabolic activity (1,6). The aim of the present study was to observe the responses of the brain to different biomaterial implantations (Col, Col-DAC, Col-CS). Both acellular and populated embryonic nerve cell scaffolds were tested through implantation. The longevity of such scaffolds, specifically whether or not they were subject to rapid degradation in the brain, was examined. The study focused on the survival of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2)- and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive cells within the scaffolds; it also was evaluated the expression of integrins β1 and α2 on embryonic nerve cells, and the involvement of the α2β1 integrin in cell attachment to the scaffold.

Materials and methods

Insight into 3D collagen-based scaffolds

Col type I was derived from well-purified porcine tendons by pepsin digestion and acetic acid dissolution to prepare a 0.7% (w/v) dispersion. Porcine tendons were bought directly from the slaughterhouse which had proper procedures and permission to obtain this material. Tendons were collected by the company Euroimplant S.A., which was a producer of collagen suspension. Tendons were taken from the lower limbs from fully mature pigs weighting approximately 100 kg, and free from the transmission factors of the infection. Tendons were wrapped in polypropylene foil and frozen at −18±2°C until to the preparation of dispersion. All experiments were conducted in accordance with national and EU ethical regulations regarding animal free from infections. The use of collagen isolated from porcine tendons was approved by the Local Commission of Ethics in Lodz, Poland (Resolution 4/LB 505/2010).

Three-dimensional (3D) sponge-shaped porous scaffolds were obtained from a dispersion containing Col and CS (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) at a ratio of 100:18. For comparison, sponges from pure Col were also formed. The sponge matrices were formed by freezing the Col dispersion or a mixture of Col with CS and then lyophilized. To improve the functional properties of the scaffold, all sponges were modified according to the methods previously described by Pietrucha (13). In brief, the sponges were immersed in 60% ethanol solution containing 35 mM 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethyl aminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and 12 mM N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) (EDC and NHS supplied from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Following the reaction, these products were thoroughly washed with Na2HPO4, NaCl and deionized water. To prepare spongy 3D scaffolds, the matrices were frozen at −45°C and lyophilized at −55°C.

The synthesis of the Col-DAC scaffold was performed by cross-linking of Col samples using 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose (DAC). A detailed description of the method has been provided previously (14–16). Briefly, 3D porous Col sponges were incubated in a solution of DAC (synthesized in own scope) at 25°C for 24 h (pH 8.0). The crosslinked products were thoroughly washed with deionized water and then refrigerated at −40°C and lyophilized at −55°C. All of the constructed sponges before implantation were sterilized using an electron beam (accelerator ELU6-Linac) with dose of 18 kGy.

Comprehensive descriptions of the biochemical, spectroscopic, morphological and structural properties of the modified Col-based scaffolds can be found in our earlier publications (14–16). Some results of the physicochemical characterization of 3D Col-based sponges are summarized in Table I.

Table I. Characteristics of physicochemical properties of collagen-based sponges.

Table I.

Characteristics of physicochemical properties of collagen-based sponges.

Parameters	Col non-crosslinked	Col-CS crosslinked by EDC/NHS	Col crosslinked by DAC
Temperature denaturation (°C)	98.0	119.0	104.0
Degree of crosslinking (%)	No crosslinking	53±2	49.0
Porosity (%)	97.00	95.01	86.49
Average pore diameter (µm)	55.40	31.05	32.09

[i] Col, collagen; Col-CS, collagen-chondroitin sulphate; EDC, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide; DAC, 2,3-dialdehyde cellulose.

Analysis of the quantitative measurements revealed that both types of investigated scaffolds, i.e., Col-CS and Col-DAC, had an average pore size of approximately 32 µm. However, the thermal stability and degree of crosslinking of Col-DAC sponges were found to be slightly lower than the Col-CS sponges crosslinked with EDC.

Animals and study design

Thirty male Wistar rats weighing 250±30 g and five female (220±20 g) were housed with free access to autoclaved commercial food (Murigran, Motycz, Poland) as well as tap water ad libitum. The animals were kept in light (L)-dark (D) conditions (L:D=12:12). The light was switched on at 07.00. The experiments were approved by the Local Commission of Ethics in Lodz, Poland (permission number 37/ŁB617/2012). All experiments were performed according to humane guidelines of legal act from January 15th 2015, devoted to protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes. The rats were divided into three groups:

Group 1: Rats implanted with Col scaffold

Group 2: Rats implanted with Col-DAC material

Group 3: Rats implanted with Col-CS scaffold

Each group consisted of two subgroups of five rats each. The rats in the first subgroup were treated with an acellular scaffold, while the respective living biomaterial scaffold containing embryonic nerve cells was implanted to the rats in the second subgroup.

Female pregnant rats at 17 days of gestation were used for embryo brain isolation.

Scaffold implantation to the rat brain

Prior to the scaffold implantation rat was anesthetised by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital at the dose of 50 mg/kg−1. After anesthesia, the rat was installed in the stereotactic frame, shaved and decontaminated with ethanol. A linear 2–3 cm long skin incision was made and a craniotomy of the left frontal bone of the skull was performed. The respective scaffold was implanted into the frontal lobe of the brain. The skin wound was closed with four sutures. Four weeks after implantation the brains were collected for histological analysis.

Isolation and culture of embryonic nerve tissue

Prior to surgery and embryo collection, the rat was anesthetized by exposure to carbon dioxide (70%) and oxygen mixture. The rats were anesthetized in chambers (25×48×23 cm). Gas flow was 5.6 dm3/min. Then, the animals were euthanized by the spinal cord dislocation. Death of euthanized animals was confirmed by absence of respiration, heartbeat and corneal reflex. Embryonic rats were euthanized by decapitation before brain isolation. The embryos at day 17 of gestation were isolated from the uterus of the pregnant female rat in sterile cold PBS (7,8). Once removed from the embryos, the brains were rinsed with PBS, and the meninges and blood vessels were excised. Then, the brains were incubated in a solution consisting of collagenase (1 mg/ml) and dispase (2 mg/ml) for five minutes at room temperature. This step aimed to remove the connective tissue. The samples were then incubated with trypsin for five minutes at 37°C. After trypsin neutralization, the samples were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm. Following this, the cells were suspended with 100 ml of medium (MACS NeuroBrew-21; MiltenyBiotec) and triturated three to five times gently. Cell suspension was seeded on laminin-covered dishes. For cell cultures, the medium composed of MACS NeuroBrew-21, gentamycin (25 µg/ml) and fungizone (2.5 µg/ml) was applied. The cells were packaged on the scaffold at a density of 9×103 cells/sample in 96 well plates (7). After three days of cultivation, the scaffolds were implanted into the brains.

The isolated cells were identified in the earlier studies (7,8). The embryonic nerve cells were nestin negative but they were morphologically differentiated (7,8).

Flow cytometry experiments

To confirm the differentiation of the isolated embryonic nerve cells into neurons (MAP 2 positive cells) as well as the expression of integrins, flow cytometry experiments were performed. After fixation (Fixation Buffer, BDCytofix), the cells were permeabilized by BD Phosflow Perm Buffer III. Following this, the cells were washed and centrifuged (5 min, 1,000 rpm) and then stained (4°C-8°C for 30 min) in Stain Buffer (BD Pharmingen). After washing and centrifugation (for 10 min at 2,000 rpm) the cells were treated with the following antibodies: mouse anti-MAP2 conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488, mouse IgG1 k isotype control conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 (BD Pharmingen) Hamster IgG2l1 isotype control conjugated with FITC, Hamster anti-rat CD49b conjugated with FITC (BD Pharmingen), Arm Hamster IgG isotype control conjugated with PE, anti-mouse/rat CD29 conjugated with PE (eBioscience). The cells were then analyzed using a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and the results were compared with the isotype control.

Investigation of the involvement of integrin α2β1 in cell entrapment within the collagenous scaffolds

The nerve embryonic cells were applied into the Col scaffolds seeded into the 96-well plates at a density of 9×103. The cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with either the medium only, the medium containing 0.1% of DMSO (the TC-I15 solvent) or the medium containing the TC-I15 inhibitor of the α2β1 integrin (10−5 M). After 30 min, the samples were triturated 30 times to wash away the unbound cells. After that time, the cells were stained with bisbensimide (1 µg/ml). The cell nuclei were counted under a fluorescent microscope at magnification, ×100. Each investigated group contained eight samples.

Histopathology

Following dissection, the brains were fixed in formalin. For further evaluation, coronal sections of each brain with grossly visible alternations (cavity) were selected. In cases with no macroscopic changes, the whole brain was submitted for standard tissue processing. Sections with a thickness of 3 µm were cut from blocks of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, mounted on microscopic slides and submitted for standard hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry.

Immunohistochemical staining was performed to identify neurons and dendrites (microtubule associated protein 2 a, b, c, MAP2) and to show the astrocytes (glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP). For antigen retrieval and deparaffinization, the slides were heated for 20 min at 97°C in EnVision Flex Target Retrieval Solution (high pH; Dako) in the PT-link instrument (Dako). For the GFAP immunostaining process, the pre-treated slides were loaded into the autostainer instrument (EnVision System; Dako) and stained with the FLEX polyclonal rabbit anti- GFAP ready-to-use primary antibody (IR524; Dako). For the MAP2 immunostaining, following pre-treatment, the slides were incubated with Peroxidase Blocking Reagent (Dako) for five minutes, and then with the primary monoclonal mouse anti-microtubule associated protein 2 (MAP2, MA5-12826, 1:200; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 16 h at 4°C. The MAP2 staining was visualised using the Dako Real EnVision Detection System (Dako). After visualisation, the slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, then dehydrated, cleared in xylene and mounted.

Results

Histological evaluation

Collagen cross-linked with EDC implanted into the brain. Among the sustained collagenous fibers of the scaffold, an inflammatory infiltrate was composed of mononuclear cells (macrophages and lymphocytes), multinucleated giant cells (foreign body type macrophages) and a few polymorphonuclear cells (Fig. 1A). Moreover, clusters of the meningeal-like cells were found within the scaffolds. Blood vessels (Fig. 1B) were seen in some scaffolds implanted into the brain. Neither MAP2-positive (Fig. 1F) nor GFAP-positive cells (Fig. 1E) were found within the scaffold.

Figure 1. (A) Col scaffolds grafted into the brain. Among the sustained collagen fibers, multinucleated, macrophages (cells with foamy cytoplasm) and mononuclear inflammatory cells (lymphocytes) are observed. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification, ×200. (B) The brain adjacent to the Col scaffolds. Multinucleated giant cells and thin-walled blood vessels are present among the implanted collagen fibers (right upper part of the figure). Mononuclear inflammatory cells (lymphocytes) in the adjacent brain. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification, ×200. (C) The brain adjacent to the Col-DAC scaffolds. The implanted Col-DAC scaffold (left lower part of the figure) is infiltrated by multinucleated giant cells and mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and macrophages). The reaction of the adjacent nervous tissue to graft implantation is minimal and comprises mononuclear cells (lymphocytes). Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification, ×100. (D) The brain tissue adjoined with the Col-CS scaffolds. The implanted Col-CS grafts (right lower part of the figure) contain multinucleated giant cells and mononuclear cells (lymphocytes and macrophages). The reaction of the tissue to graft implantation is minimal and comprises mononuclear cell infiltration. Staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification, ×100. (E) GFAP immunostaining of the brain adjacent to the Col scaffolds. Cells present among the implanted collagen fibers (left lower part of the figure) are GFAP-negative. The positive GFAP reaction can be observed in the surrounding brain. Magnification, ×40. (F) MAP2 immunostaining adjacent to the Col scaffolds brain. The tissue surrounding the Col graft is normal and indicated MAP2 immunoexpression. The mononuclear cells directly adhered with the scaffold remnants and the multinucleated giant cells within the graft are MAP2-negative. Magnification, ×100. (G) MAP2 immunostaining of the brain adjacent to the Col-DAC scaffolds. Cells directly adhered the Col-DAC scaffold and those situated within the graft are MAP2 negative. The MAP2-positive reaction is seen within the normal brain. Magnification, ×100. (H) MAP2 immunostaining of the brain adjacent to the Col-CS scaffolds. A thin cell layer directly adhered the Col-CS scaffold and those situated within the graft were revealed to be MAP2 negative. The MAP2-positive reaction is observed within the encephalon. The scaffold is not visible in the image. Magnification, ×100. Col, collagen; Col-DAC, collagen-dialdehyde cellulose; Col-CS, collagen-chondroitin sulphate; MAP2, microtubule-associated protein 2; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein.

In the adjacent area of the injury, brain mononuclear cells (several lymphocytes, some hemosiderin-laden macrophages and a few macrophages) and reactive astrocytes were observed. Thick cerebral leptomeninges contained several lymphocytes and macrophages, some of which were laden with hemosiderin. In the deeper part of the brain, small basophilic structures (dying neurons) were found (Fig. 1B). In the adjacent area, reactive mononuclear cells (MAP2 negative) were observed, as well as an increased number of GFAP positive (glial) cells (Fig. 1E).

Implantation of collagen cross-linked by dialdehyde cellulose

Numerous cells were found to have infiltrated the implant fibers; the inflammatory cells were thus comprised of lymphocytes, multinucleated giant cells, macrophages and neutrophils (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, calcifications and eosinophilic structures were observed within the scaffolds. Thin-walled blood vessels were shown in some implanted scaffolds.

In the brain surrounding the implant, focal edema and gliosis were observed. Moreover, hemosiderin deposits, amyloid bodies, small calcifications, hemosiderin-laden macrophages and dispersed infiltration of mononuclear cells (lymphocytes) were detected (Fig. 1C). Fibrosis of the cerebral leptomeninges was present. In the adjacent area of the brain, a thin layer of MAP2 negative mononuclear cells was observed (Fig. 1G).

Implantation of composite containing collagen supplemented with CS cross-linked by EDC

Numerous cells were found among the fibers of the implanted scaffold, these being mononuclear cells (macrophages, hemosiderin-laden macrophages and lymphocytes) and multinucleated giant cells (foreign body type' macrophages) (Fig. 1D). Thin-walled blood vessels were seen among the collagen fibres of a few scaffolds implanted into the brain. In the area adjacent to the implant layer, hyperaemia was observed, as were small hemosiderin deposits and mononuclear cells (hemosiderin-laden macrophages, macrophages and lymphocytes). Moreover, cerebral leptomeninges, found adjacent to the cavity containing the implant, showed features of fibrosis. In the deeper parts of the brain area, small, oval, basophilic structures were observed (Fig. 1D). In the adjacent brain area, a thin layer of MAP2 negative mononuclear cells was observed (Fig. 1H).

Examination of the adhesion of cells to the scaffold

Expression of both integrin α2 (Fig. 2A) and integrin β1 (Fig. 2B) was detected on nerve embryonic cells by flow cytometry studies. The same numbers of entrapped cells were observed in the samples incubated with TC-I15 in the collagenous scaffold (Fig. 2C), the control group and the cells treated with TC-I15 solvent (0.1% DMSO).

Figure 2. (A) FACS profiles indicating embryonic nervous cell expression of α2 integrin (right curve) compared with isotypic control (left curve). (B) FACS profiles demonstrating the expression of b2 integrin on embryonic nervous cells (right curve) compared with isotypic control (left curve). (C) Cell number seeded on collagenous scaffolds incubated with medium (CTR), 0.1% DMSO or TCI-15 integrine α2β1 inhibitor 10−5 M (TCI-15). The cells were counted in five microscopic fields of each sample (P=x100). Each value expresses the mean of seven samples ± standard deviation.

Discussion

Our results confirm the presence of Col fibers of the inserted scaffold within the area of the brain injury, with the morphological features of the scaffolds appearing to remain intact. The scaffolds remained structurally intact for as long as four weeks after implantation, suggesting that the material may serve as a suitable template for cell migration. Moreover, the fibers of the graft may be involved in the regulation of electrolytes and water homeostasis of the tissue (17).

The implanted material induced no or minimal inflammatory reaction in adjacent brain areas. The inflammatory cells were found to accumulate around the scaffold as well as infiltrated into the biomaterial (Fig. 1A-D). Implantation of the scaffolds induced granulomatous tissue reaction comprising an accumulation of multinucleated macrophages, mononuclear inflammatory cells and formation of blood vessels. These results are comparable with other studies. The inflammatory reaction was seen to be calmed by implantation of gelatin-laminin materials (18), while Vaysse et al did not find any inflammatory reaction three months after implantation of micropatterned polydimethylsiloxane with neuronal cells, with the graft remaining intact (19). No excessive inflammatory reaction was found to be associated with any of the three types of applied implants during the present study (Fig. 1A-D).

Vascularization is a critical and important event in tissue engineering. In all three types of tested biomaterials, thin-walled blood vessels were found to be situated within the scaffolds. These results suggest that Col alone, independent of the cross-linking method, may support new blood vessel formation. Hence, even without addition of angiogenic factors, the tested samples constituted a suitable niche for promoting local angiogenesis. Scaffolds with angiogenic properties are recommended in the treatment of ischemic brain lesions (20). Some reports suggest a relationship between neurogenesis and angiogenesis in brain lesions (21). Huang et al (5) report increased angiogenesis after Col-GAG scaffold implantation into the brain; however, the types of GAGs forming the scaffolds were not defined. Elsewhere, implantation of such as scaffold into the brain lesion increased proliferation of both smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells (22). These phenomena were accompanied with an increased concentration of angiogenic growth factors (VEGF, FGF2, PDGF) in the tissue (2,5). To fully clarify the angiogenic properties of the scaffolds, further studies should employ immunohistochemical staining of CD 44.

Little development of the glial scar at the graft periphery was observed, but no GFAP positive cells (cells with glial differentiation) were found inside the scaffold (Fig. 1E); in addition, no excessive gliosis was observed after any scaffold implantation. These results are supported by those of experiments performed on other scaffolds (2,18,23). After implantation of the Col-GAGs scaffold into the brain, astrocite accumulation was reported only in the lesion boundary zone, and these cells did not proliferate (2). Jurga et al found that astrocites mainly accumulated at the edges of the scaffolds (18). Although infiltration of astrocite microglial and endothelial cells was reported following the introduction of a gelatin-siloxane biomaterial implant into the brain, no infiltration of neurons was reported (19).

Flow cytometry studies have found that the embryonic nerve cells seeded within the scaffolds contained cells differentiating into neurons (MAP2-positive cells) (7,8); these are able to replace the damaged nervous tissue at the site of trauma, and are hence, crucial for tissue reconstruction. Scaffolds populated with embryonic nerve cells are also believed to be a source of cytokines that may accelerate the regeneration process. However, the clinical effects of cell-containing scaffold implantations into the brain are very limited due to low cell survival rate: the cells that populate the scaffolds usually die a few days after implantation. The main causes of cell death are inflammation, immune processing, oxidative stress and low levels of trophic factors (23,24). The main mechanisms of neuron death are necrosis and apoptosis (25). Sortwell et al (26) found that the critical period for apoptotic death is the first four days post-implantation. In the present study, no MAP2-positive cells were found within any scaffold at four weeks after implantation (Fig. 1F-H). Furthermore, no additional effects with regard to brain injury regeneration were observed in the cell-seeded scaffold compared with the acellular scaffold. This lack of difference may be linked to fact that these cells populated within the scaffolds are believed to die just after implantation.

Our present observations regarding cell survival reflect a problem described earlier in the literature (25,26). Although all tested scaffolds were well tolerated by injured brain tissue, they were unable to shelter seeded embryonic nerve cells from death. Applied scaffolds cannot support the survival of the embryonic nerve cells or the ingrowth of MAP2- or GFAP-positive cells from adjacent brain. Moreover, observations in vivo revealed that meningeal cells and blood vessels may grow into the scaffolds. Thus, the additional modification of the sponges are postulated to create a niche supporting embryonic nerve cell survival in vivo.

Some earlier studies were performed to protect the cells populated within the scaffold from death. Marchionini et al (27) tested the effects of caspase inhibitors in protecting tyrosine hydroxylase immunoreactive neurons from apoptosis, but found neuron survival not to be prolonged. Despite this, a recent study by Vaysse et al did achieve neuron survival following the implantation of micropatterned polydimethylsiloxane biomaterial with neuronal cells into the brain. This improvement in the neuronal cell survival resulted in the addition of polylysine and laminin to the graft (19). These compounds are believed to reduce the traumatism of implantation. All grafts used in our study displayed beneficial effects for embryonic nerve cell growth, and have previously been reported in in vitro experiments (7,8). However, the tested samples were unable to improve the survival of the cells within the grafts after implantation into the brain.

The interaction of the Col with embryonic nerve cells may influence both the differentiation and the migration of the cells (18,24,28,29). Our findings are the first to demonstrate the expression of both α2 and β1 integrins on the surface of the embryonic nerve cells (Fig. 2A and B). Integrin α2β1 is believed to be involved in the interaction between mesenchymal stem cells and Col scaffolds (11). The α2β1 integrin inhibitor TCI-15 did not modify cell entrapment within the scaffolds. Although our findings fail to confirm the involvement of α2β1 integrin in binding of collagen scaffolds, they nevertheless suggest that other receptors for extracellular collagen (integrins α1β1, α10β1 α11β1 and Discoidin Domain Receptors) should be considered as potential targets for the interaction with extracellular collagen.

Our findings confirm that the tested samples of Col, either alone, with CS cross-linked by EDC or modified by DAC, are well tolerated by rat tissue and may be implanted into the brain. During the duration of the experiment, the Col fibers remained intact and hence may support cell migration and development. None of the tested biomaterials induced large glial scar formation. Moreover, no additional effects were seen when scaffolds seeded with embryonic nerve cells were implanted compared to the acellular grafts. This may be due to the possible death of all embryonic nerve cells after implantation of the scaffold. As our results show, the tested biomaterials are worth considering in the treatment of brain injury; however, additional modifications of the material are postulated to improve survival of the cells in vivo. This paper also confirmed the expression of integrins α2 and β1 on nerve embryonic cells.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs Teresa Staszewska (Department of Behavioral Pathophysiology, Medical University of Lodz, ul. Zeligowskiego 9/7, 90–752 Lodz, Poland) for her technical assistance.

Funding

The present study was supported by National Science Centre (grant no. DEC-2011/03/B/ST8/05867). Publication of the present study was supported by the Medical University of Lodz (grant no. 503/6-103-02/503-061-001-18).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

JD and KP contributed to the research concept and design of the current study. JD, KJ, LP, BP, JS and MS collected and assembled the data. JD, KJ, MS and JS analyzed and interpreted the data. JD, KP and KJ wrote the manuscript. JD, KP, KJ, LP, BP, MS and JS critically revised the article. JD, KP, KJ, LP, BP, JS and MS approved the article.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The experiments were approved by the Local Commission of Ethics in Lodz.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References