Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Adina Ghemigian
    • Mara Carsote
    • Florica Sandru
    • Razvan-Cosmin Petca
    • Ana-Maria Oproiu
    • Aida Petca
    • Ana Valea
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 26, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10653
  • Article Number: 1219
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

This is a narrative review focusing on neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) and bone status, in terms of metastases and osteoporosis/fractures. One fifth of NEN have skeletal dissemination, this affinity being regulated by intrinsic tumor factors such as the C‑X‑C chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4). Bone colonization impairs the patient quality of life, representing a surrogate of reduced survival. Patients with NEN without bone metastases may exhibit low bone mineral density, perhaps carcinoid‑related osteoporosis, yet not a standardized cause of osteoporosis. Case‑finding strategies to address bone health in NEN with a good prognosis are lacking. Contributors to fractures in NEN subjects may include: menopausal status and advanced age, different drugs, induced hypogonadism, malnutrition, malabsorption (due to intestinal resection, carcinoid syndrome), hypovitaminosis D, impaired glucose profile (due to excessive hormones such as glucagon, somatostatinoma or use of somatostatin analogues), various corticoid regimes, and high risk of fall due to sarcopenia. Pheocromocytoma/paraganglioma involve bone through malignant forms (bone is an elective site) and potential secondary osteoporosis due to excessive hormonal content and increased sympathetic activity which is a key player of bone microarchitecture/quality as reflected by low Trabecular Bone Score. Glucocorticoid osteoporosis is related to NEN‑associated ectopic Cushing syndrome. Currently, there are a lack of studies to emphasis that excessive gut‑derivate serotonin in NENs with carcinoid syndrome is a specific activator of bone loss thus a contributor to carcinoid‑related osteoporosis.
View References

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2021
Volume 22 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ghemigian A, Carsote M, Sandru F, Petca R, Oproiu A, Petca A and Valea A: Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review). Exp Ther Med 22: 1219, 2021.
APA
Ghemigian, A., Carsote, M., Sandru, F., Petca, R., Oproiu, A., Petca, A., & Valea, A. (2021). Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 22, 1219. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10653
MLA
Ghemigian, A., Carsote, M., Sandru, F., Petca, R., Oproiu, A., Petca, A., Valea, A."Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22.5 (2021): 1219.
Chicago
Ghemigian, A., Carsote, M., Sandru, F., Petca, R., Oproiu, A., Petca, A., Valea, A."Neuroendocrine neoplasia and bone (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 5 (2021): 1219. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10653