Hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with non‑small cell lung cancer who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Xiaofang Wang
    • Xiao Mi
    • Teng Li
    • Chengcheng Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 30, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11927
  • Article Number: 228
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

We previously demonstrated that a transforming growth factor β type II receptor (TGFBR2) mutation can predict resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), based on publicly available immunotherapeutic cohorts. However, the efficacy of ICI‑based regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring TGFBR2 mutations in the real‑world setting is rarely reported. The present study describes the case of a patient with advanced NSCLC who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation. The patient was treated with ICI monotherapy and experienced hyperprogressive disease (HPD). The clinical information was retrospectively collected. The progression‑free survival (PFS) was only 1.3 months. In conclusion, HPD occurred in a patient with advanced NSCLC with a TGFBR2 mutation who received an ICI monotherapy regimen. The findings suggested that caution may be required regarding the clinical delivery of ICI monotherapy to patients with NSCLC and TGFBR2 mutations; ICIs combined with chemotherapy may be an alternative treatment option.

Introduction

Recently, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved the overall survival of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (1-3). However, only a small subset of patients can respond to ICIs and the objective response rate (ORR) is only 20 to 30% for single-agent (4,5). Previous efforts have been made to identify the clinical or genetic biomarkers of response to ICIs, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (6), and tumor mutational burden (TMB) (7,8). However, it is of equal significance to identify patients who are resistant or even hyper-progress after ICIs, which helps develop novel strategies to overcome drug resistance.

Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) has been observed during immunotherapy in a small subset of patients (9,10). HPD is defined as a progressive disease on the first computed tomography (CT) scan during immunotherapy and the tumor growth rate (TGR) exceeds 50% compared with baseline, corresponding to an absolute increase in the TGR exceeding 50% per month (9). In previous studies, murine double minute 2/4 (MDM2/4) amplification, Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 loss-of-function mutation and EGFR mutation have been reported to be associated with HPD (10,11). The incidence of HPD ranged from 8.0 to 30.4% in NSCLC after treatment with ICIs monotherapy (9,12,13).

Transforming growth factor β type II receptor (TGFBR2) is a transmembrane protein with a protein kinase domain, which is responsible for recruiting and phosphorylating TGFB1, and binding TGF-β, thus forming a heterodimeric complex (14,15). We previously demonstrated that TGFBR2 mutation was a negative predictor of ICIs in patients with NSCLC using public immunotherapeutic cohorts (16). However, the efficacy of ICIs monotherapy in NSCLC patients harboring TGFBR2 mutation in the real-world setting has not been reported. Besides, chemoimmunotherapy has been widely used as maintenance or as first line therapy in advanced NSCLC patients without EGFR or ALK alterations (17). Therefore, in the present study, we described one NSCLC case harboring TGFBR2 mutations treated with immunotherapy, providing insights into the therapeutic outcome for these patients in a real-world setting.

Case report

The patient was a 39-year-old female who was diagnosed in our hospital with lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of lung cancer, a rare pathological type of NSCLC in April 2015 by computed tomography (CT) and pathology results. The clinical stage was cT4N3M1 when diagnosed. The baseline characteristics, mutation status in driver genes, treatments, and responses were summarized in Table I. The expression of PD-L1 was tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the result was negative.

Table I

The characteristics and clinical outcomes of the case.

Table I

The characteristics and clinical outcomes of the case.

PatientAge, yearsSexSmokingPathologyStageMetastasesECOGTGFBR2 mutationEGFR/ ALK/ ROS1 mutationTMBPD-L1ICIs based regimensLine of treatmentBest of responsePFS, months
139FemaleNoLELCIVBLiver1p.S268*None420%Nivolumab2PD1.3

[i] ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; ROS1, repressor of silencing 1; TGFBR2, transforming growth factor β receptor 2; TMB, tumor mutation burden; ICIs, immune checkpoint inhibitors; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival; LELC, lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

The whole exome sequencing analysis of specimen acquired by puncture needle showed that the patient had TGFBR2 p.S268* mutation, and no other target-druggable mutations. The TMB was 42 Muts/Mb. The patient then received gemcitabine and cisplatin as the first-line treatment. The best response was partial response (PR). However, on June 15th, 2016, the CT image showed increased tumor lesions in both size and number in bilateral lung with the largest tumor lesion of 16 mm x 14 mm, as well as liver metastasis with the largest tumor lesion of 36 mm x 29 mm (Fig. 1A). After progression during gemcitabine and cisplatin treatment, the patient was admitted into a clinical trial of nivolumab and started to receive 3 mg/kg nivolumab since June 21st, 2016. However, after three cycles of nivolumab, the tumor lesions in bilateral lung increased in size and number and the largest tumor lesion was 43 mm x 28 mm. The tumor lesion from the liver increased to 71 mm x 67 mm. The response was considered as progression disease (PD) based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and the progress free survival (PFS) was only 1.3 months. Then the patient received docetaxel as the third-line treatment. The lesion in the right lung decreased to 30 mm x 19 mm on September 12th, 2016. According to the definition of hyperprogression from a previous study (13), the patient experienced hyperprogression from ICIs, with the time-to-treatment failure less than two months, >50% increase in tumor burden compared with pre-immunotherapy imaging, and a >2-fold increase in progression pace (Fig. 1B).

Discussion

Herein, we described an advanced NSCLC patient who harbored TFGBR2 mutation and experienced HPD after ICI monotherapy treatment. The previous study suggested that NSCLC patients with TGFBR2 mutations may not benefit from ICI monotherapy, this case further indicated that they may even experience a rapid deteriorated outcome. More aggressive therapeutic regimens such as immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may be an alternative.

TGF-β signaling pathways serve as a tumor suppressor in normal cells and early carcinomas, but in advanced tumors, TGF-β signaling turns to promote cancer progression, invasion, and tumor metastasis (18). In tumor microenvironment, TGF-β regulated cancer immunity through many kinds of immune cells. For example, TGF-β promoted the production of interleukin-10 (IL-10), which was secreted from tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs), and played an inverse role in anti-tumor immunity. Moreover, TGF-β inhibited the secretion of anti-tumor cytokine, interferon-gamma, and cytotoxic granzyme B from the natural killer (NK) cells and CD8+ T cells (18). Thus, TGF-β plays a crucial role in immune regulation.

The TGFBR2 gene encodes the TGF-β receptor 2, a member of the TGF-β signaling, and forms a hetero-tetrameric complex with TGFBR1. Genetic deletion of TGFBR2 in CD4+ T cells suppressed tumor growth (19). Our previous study demonstrated that TGFBR2 mutation served as a negative predictor of ICIs in patients with NSCLC in public datasets. In this study, one TGFBR2 mutant NSCLC case was described in detail (20). The therapeutic efficacy was further observed in real-world settings in this study. The case further proved that patients with mutated TGFBR2 might not respond to ICIs and even hyperprogress from ICIs. So the utility of immune monotherapy needs to be cautious in patients harboring TGFBR2 mutation.

Chemotherapeutics can synergize with ICI and promote patients' immune system by enhancing immunogenic tumor cells death, increasing cancer cells neoantigens production, and augmenting the levels of tumor microenvironment pro-inflammatory cytokines (17). Thus, we propose that chemoimmunotherapy may overcome the immunosuppression environment caused by mutations in TGBFR2 and be a hopeful treatment option for NSCLC patients with TGFBR2 mutations.

Notably, the patient was diagnosed with NSCLC on April 30th, 2015, when the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy has not been approved as the first-line regimen for the patients with NSCLC. Nowadays, both the immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy have been recommended by the national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) (20) as the first-line treatment regimen for the patients with NSCLC. However, the biomarker for the immune checkpoint inhibitor mono- or combined therapy was not explicit.

Our result suggested that the clinical delivery of ICI monotherapy needs to be cautious in NSCLC patients with TGFBR2 mutation and ICIs combined with chemotherapy might be an alternative. However, further studies with a larger sample size are warranted.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms. Lan Su (Burning Rock Biotech, Guangzhou, China) for data collection.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

XW conceived and designed the present study. XW and XM wrote the original draft. TL, CL and XM performed the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. XW and TL confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocols involving patients were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chongqing First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University). The patients enrolled in this research provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of this case report and all accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, et al: Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 375:1823–1833. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, von Pawel J, Gadgeel SM, Hida T, Kowalski DM, Dols MC, et al: Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): A phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 389:255–265. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Zhou Y, Chen C, Zhang X, Fu S, Xue C, Ma Y, Fang W, Yang Y, Hou X, Huang Y, et al: Immune-checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer. 6:1–11. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han JY, Molina J, Kim JH, Arvis CD, Ahn MJ, et al: Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 387:1540–1550. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csőszi T, Fülöp A, Gottfried M, Peled N, Tafreshi A, Cuffe S, et al: Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab versus platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. J Clin Oncol. 37:537–546. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Patel SP and Kurzrock R: PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 14:847–856. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, Lee JS, Otterson GA, Audigier-Valette C, Minenza E, Linardou H, Burgers S, Salman P, et al: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in lung cancer with a high tumor mutational burden. N Engl J Med. 378:2093–2104. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Gandara DR, Paul SM, Kowanetz M, Schleifman E, Zou W, Li Y, Rittmeyer A, Fehrenbacher L, Otto G, Malboeuf C, et al: Blood-based tumor mutational burden as a predictor of clinical benefit in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with atezolizumab. Nat Med. 24:1441–1448. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Ferrara R, Mezquita L, Texier M, Lahmar J, Audigier-Valette C, Tessonnier L, Mazieres J, Zalcman G, Brosseau S, Le Moulec S, et al: Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or with single-agent chemotherapy. JAMA Oncol. 4:1543–1552. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Forschner A, Hilke FJ, Bonzheim I, Gschwind A, Demidov G, Amaral T, Ossowski S, Riess O, Schroeder C, Martus P, et al: MDM2, MDM4 and EGFR amplifications and hyperprogression in metastatic acral and mucosal melanoma. Cancers (Basel). 12(540)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Shin DS, Zaretsky JM, Escuin-Ordinas H, Garcia-Diaz A, Hu-Lieskovan S, Kalbasi A, Grasso CS, Hugo W, Sandoval S, Torrejon DY, et al: Primary resistance to PD-1 blockade mediated by JAK1/2 mutations. Cancer Discov. 7:188–201. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Kato S, Goodman A, Walavalkar V, Barkauskas DA, Sharabi A and Kurzrock R: Hyperprogressors after immunotherapy: Analysis of genomic alterations associated with accelerated growth rate. Clin Cancer Res. 23:4242–4250. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Chen Y, Hu J, Bu F, Zhang H, Fei K and Zhang P: Clinical characteristics of hyperprogressive disease in NSCLC after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 20(707)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

David CJ and Massagué J: Contextual determinants of TGFβ action in development, immunity and cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19:419–435. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Shimmi O and Newfeld SJ: New insights into extracellular and post-translational regulation of TGF-β family signalling pathways. J Biochem. 154:11–19. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Li T, Wang H, Xu J, Li C, Zhang Y, Wang G, Liu Y, Cai S, Fang W, Li J and Wang Z: TGFBR2 mutation predicts resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 13(17588359211038477)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Rocco D, Della Gravara L, Battiloro C and Gridelli C: The role of combination chemo-immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 19:561–568. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Neel JC, Humbert L and Lebrun JJ: The dual role of TGFβ in human cancer: From tumor suppression to cancer metastasis. ISRN Mol Biol. 2012(381428)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

MaruYama T, Chen W and Shibata H: TGF-β and cancer immunotherapy. Biol Pharm Bull. 45:155–161. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, Akerley W, Bauman JR, Bharat A, Bruno DS, Chang JY, Chirieac LR, D'Amico TA, et al: Non-small cell lung cancer, version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 20:497–530. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2023
Volume 25 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang X, Mi X, Li T and Li C: Hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with non‑small cell lung cancer who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation: A case report. Exp Ther Med 25: 228, 2023
APA
Wang, X., Mi, X., Li, T., & Li, C. (2023). Hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with non‑small cell lung cancer who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation: A case report. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 25, 228. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11927
MLA
Wang, X., Mi, X., Li, T., Li, C."Hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with non‑small cell lung cancer who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 25.5 (2023): 228.
Chicago
Wang, X., Mi, X., Li, T., Li, C."Hyperprogressive disease after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with non‑small cell lung cancer who harbors a TGFBR2 mutation: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 25, no. 5 (2023): 228. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.11927