Volume replacement in tumor plastic surgery and breast-conserving surgery using 3D grid and strip‑shaped acellular dermal matrix: Two case reports

Wang,Yaqi; Wang,Siyuan; Liu,Xinjing; Hu,Jiwei; Ma,Jie

doi:10.3892/etm.2024.12655

Volume replacement in tumor plastic surgery and breast-conserving surgery using 3D grid and strip‑shaped acellular dermal matrix: Two case reports

Authors:
- Yaqi Wang
- Siyuan Wang
- Xinjing Liu
- Jiwei Hu
- Jie Ma
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Breast Surgery, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063001, P.R. China, Department of Clinical Medicine, The First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510000, P.R. China, Department of Breast Surgery, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei 063001, P.R. China
Published online on: July 16, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12655
Article Number: 366
Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The present study was driven by the scarcity of suitable materials for mending partial breast defects and the imperative considerations of safety and durability. The current study presents findings from two female patients, aged 59 and 40, who underwent breast cancer treatment. Patient 1 underwent a mastectomy with a sentinel lymph node biopsy, while patient 2 underwent a partial mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Core needle biopsy confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma in both cases. Breast ultrasound revealed hypoechoic lesions with smooth edges. The reconstruction of the breast defect employed an acellular dermal matrix, and the safety and cosmetic outcomes for each patient were analyzed. At 3 months post‑radiotherapy, neither patient experienced significant complications. The preservation of breast contour and volume was satisfactory, with no postoperative tumor recurrences detected. In summary, utilizing an acellular dermal matrix with a three‑dimensional grid design for partial breast defect reconstruction offers a viable alternative that aligns with oncological safety standards and provides good cosmetic results.

View Figures

View References

1	Choi JE, Kim Z, Park CS, Park EH, Lee SB, Lee SK, Choi YJ, Han J, Jung KW, Kim HJ, et al: Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2019. J Breast Cancer. 26:207–220. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
2	Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P and Raposio E: Oncoplastic breast surgery: Comprehensive review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 21:2572–2585. 2017.PubMed/NCBI
3	Thiessen FEF, Tjalma WAA and Tondu T: Breast reconstruction after breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 230:233–238. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	An J, Kwon H, Lim W, Moon BI and Paik NS: The comparison of breast reconstruction using two types of acellular dermal matrix after breast-conserving surgery. J Clin Med. 10(3430)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Hallberg H, Rafnsdottir S, Selvaggi G, Strandell A, Samuelsson O, Stadig I, Svanberg T, Hansson E and Lewin R: Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 52:130–147. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Gravina PR, Pettit RW, Davis MJ, Winocour SJ and Selber JC: Evidence for the use of acellular dermal matrix in implant-based breast reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg. 33:229–235. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Wazir U and Mokbel K: The evolving role of pre-pectoral ADM-assisted implant-based immediate breast reconstruction following skin-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 216:639–640. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Cabalag MS, Rostek M, Miller GS, Chae MP, Quinn T, Rozen WM and Hunter-Smith DJ: Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 5:158–173. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Sorkin M, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Kozlow JH, Pusic AL and Wilkins EG: Acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction: A multicenter assessment of risks and benefits. Plast Reconstr Surg. 140:1091–1100. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Lee J, Yang JD, Lee JW, Li J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Park CS, Lee JS and Park HY: Acellular dermal matrix combined with oxidized regenerated cellulose for partial breast reconstruction: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 99(e21217)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
11	Fadaeizadeh L, Emami H and Samiei K: Comparison of visual analogue scale and faces rating scale in measuring acute postoperative pain. Arch Iranian Med. 12:73–75. 2009.PubMed/NCBI
12	Lee J and Bae Y: The use of absorbable interceed® pouch with double-layer skin closure for partial defect of breast. Breast J. 20:414–419. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
13	Araujo AM, Gómez M, Pascual J, Castañeda M, Pezonaga L and Borque JL: Treatment of pain in the oncology patient. An Sist Sanit Navar. 27 (Suppl 3):S63–S75. 2004.PubMed/NCBI(In Spanish).
14	Rhodes LE, de Rie MA, Leifsdottir R, Yu RC, Bachmann I, Goulden V, Wong GA, Richard MA, Anstey A and Wolf P: Five-year follow-up of a ran domized, prospective trial of topical methyl aminolevulinate photody namic therapy vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol. 143:1131–1136. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Mosterd K, Arits AH, Nelemans PJ and Kelleners-Smeets NW: Aesthetic evaluation after non-invasive treatment for superficial basal cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 27:647–650. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Stone Ii R, Natesan S, Kowalczewski CJ, Mangum LH, Clay NE, Clohessy RM, Carlsson AH, Tassin DH, Chan RK, Rizzo JA and Christy RJ: Advancements in regenerative strategies through the continuum of burn care. Front Pharmacol. 9(672)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
17	Cooper J and Mirzayan R: Acellular dermal matrix in rotator cuff surgery. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 45:301–305. 2016.PubMed/NCBI
18	Haney NM, Huang MM, Liu JL, Hawksworth DJ and Burnett AL: Acellular dermal matrix tissues in genitourinary reconstructive surgery: A review of the literature and case discussions. Sex Med Rev. 9:488–497. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
19	Gwak H, Jeon YW, Lim ST, Park SY and Suh YJ: Volume replacement with diced acellular dermal matrix in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: A prospective single-center experience. World J Surg Oncol. 18(60)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Schwartz JD: Use of a bioabsorbable implant-acellular dermal matrix construct to facilitate oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 9(e3356)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar