Phytosphigosine-1-phosphate increases sensitivity of EGF-dependent cell proliferation
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 7, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1617
- Pages: 649-653
Abstract
Introduction
Human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) are mesenchymal cells specialized in extracellular matrix synthesis, including collagen, elastin and hyaluronic acid, in the dermis (1,2). Dermal fibroblast proliferation is important in wound healing and skin structure homeostasis (3). Therefore, a growth factor was used for proliferating HDFs in cosmetics (4).
Epidermal growth factor (EGF), one of various growth factors, is a small polypeptide first purified by Cohen from the submaxillary gland of adult male mice (5). EGF is important in cell proliferation, migration and differentiation (5). These roles are mediated via activation of the EGF receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity (6). Activated EGFR regulates proliferation and migration via activation of intrinsic signaling molecules (7,8). EGF is added to serum-free media in in vitro cell culture systems as EGF is essential to cell growth (9). Furthermore, EGF exerts cytoprotective effects from cell damage, such as senescence (10). Therefore, EGF is used as an inducer of dermal fibroblast proliferation in cosmetics and medicine (4).
Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate (PhS1P) is derived from fungi and plants, and is structurally similar to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), an endogenous signal lipid in mammalian cells (11,12). PhS1P is an agonist for S1P receptors, with a particularly high affinity for S1P4 (13). S1P receptors include the isomers, S1P1, S1P2, S1P3 and S1P4, in mammalian cells (13). Since each receptor activates different downstream signals, the effects of these S1Ps are slightly different (14,15). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the PhS1P function in HDFs. The results showed that PhS1P altered gene expression and induced EGF-dependent proliferation as a synergistic effector.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and materials
HDFs were purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland) and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. PhS1P was obtained from Phytos Co., Ltd. (Suwon, Korea).
RNA extraction and microarray
Total RNA was isolated using RiboEX (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea) and quantified based on the optical density ratio (280/260 nm) using a Bioanalyzer 2100 (28S RNA/18S RNA ratio; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Equal amounts of RNA were used to synthesize cDNA and label it with biotin using an RNA amplification kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). After labeling, the microarray was hybridized with biotin-labeled RNA and streptavidin-Cy3 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following hybridization, the microarray was washed using wash E1BC buffer and scanned using the iScan system (both from Illumina, Hayward, CA, USA).
Microarray analyses
Microarray data were analyzed using Genespring GX software version 11 (Agilent Technologies). mRNAs flagged ‘present’ in at least one sample were analyzed using fold-change. The threshold cut-off was 1.3-fold for fold-change between non-treated HDFs and PhS1P-treated HDFs. Significantly altered mRNAs were sorted using the gene ontology (GO) tool.
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
cDNA was synthesized using MMLV-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Synthesized cDNA was used for qPCR (Line gene K; Bioer Technology, Co., Ltd., China) using specific primers for cyclin A1, B1 and B2. Primers were designed by primer 3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu) (Table I). Expression was normalized to β-actin.
MTT assay
Cell viability was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. HDFs were cultured for 24 h in 96-well plates with PhS1P and EGF. MTT tetrazolium salt (0.5 mg/ml; Sigma) was added to cells for 4 h. After incubation, the medium was replaced with dimethyl sulfoxide in each well. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 595 nm using a plate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Results
PhS1P cytotoxicity in HDFs
To assess the effect of PhS1P on cell viability, HDFs were treated with various concentrations of PhS1P (0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 μM) for 24 h (Fig. 1). We determined that PhS1P at concentrations of ≤1 μM had no cytotoxicity.
PhS1P alters the mRNA expression profile
To identify genes that may play a PhS1P-dependent role, we compared the expression profiles of non-treated and 1 μM PhS1P-treated HDFs using the Illumina bead chip HumanHT-12. In 47,207 whole genes, we first filtered 35,973 genes that were flagged ‘present’ with a frequency higher than the sensitivity of detection in a minimum of one array. Fold-change was then analyzed in these flag-filtered genes. Genes that changed by 1.3-fold between non-treated and PhS1P-treated HDFs were presented on the heat map (Fig. 2A). The analyses identified 193 upregulated genes and 495 downregulated genes (Fig. 2B).
Using the GO analytical tool, the genes were sorted based on their roles in biological processes (Fig. 3). Genes upregulated in PhS1P-treated HDFs appeared to be involved in cell processes such as cell cycle, cell division, microtubule-based processes, chromosome segregation, cell communication, cellular responses to stimuli, and cellular component organization or biogenesis. In particular, cell cycle-related ontology (cell cycle, cell division and chromosome segregation) was significantly enriched by PhS1P.
Cyclins A2, B1 and B2 were regulated by PhS1P. Cyclins are well-known regulators in cells (16). Therefore, the analyses revealed that PhS1P affected cell proliferation by altering specific mRNAs. In addition, we confirmed the mRNA expression change of cyclin A2, B1 and B2 using qPCR (Fig. 4).
We also examined the synergistic effect of PhS1P and EGF on HDF viability. Compared with PhS1P-treated HDFs in the absence of EGF, the viability of PhS1P-treated HDFs with EGF was markedly increased (Fig. 4D). These data indicate that PhS1P is a co-effector in the induction of EGF-dependent cell proliferation.
Discussion
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of PhS1P on EGF-induced proliferation in HDFs. PhS1P is phytochemically derived from fungi, plants, and even mammalian cells (12). In a previous study, it was shown that PhS1P protects against hydrogen peroxide-dependent growth arrest (17). Recent data from Lee et al (17) suggested that PhS1P had no significant effect on the proliferation at concentrations <1 μM in HDFs (Fig. 1). However, PhS1P (1 μM) regulates various cell cycle-related genes in HDFs (Fig. 2). In particular, the cyclins (cyclin A2, B1 and B2), master regulators of the cell cycle, were upregulated by PhS1P. Cyclin A2 regulates S-phase progression and entry into mitosis (18,19). During S phase, cyclin A2 initiates DNA synthesis (20). During the G/M phase, cyclin A2 triggers entry into mitosis by activating cyclin B1-Cdk1 (21).
In the progressing cell cycle, a sustained high expression of cyclins is essential (16). However, overexpression of cyclins is insufficient to induce cell cycle progression (22,23). As shown in Fig. 2, PhS1P upregulated mRNA expression of cyclin A2, B1 and B2 although there was no change in cell viability (Figs. 1 and 2).
Combining the present data with our previous data (17), we determined that <1 μM PhS1P increases cyclin expression, but does not affect viability. Moreover, EGF triggered proliferation in PhS1P-treated HDFs (Fig. 4D). Therefore, together with the results from Ikezawa et al (22), our data suggest that a cyclin-enriched condition results in synergistic growth following treatment with growth factors, such as EGF (24).
In summary, results of the present study have shown that PhS1P regulates cell cycle-related genes. In addition, the changes in gene expression synergistically trigger EGF-induced proliferation.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all other members of Damy Chemical Co., Ltd. for their support. This study was supported by the Konkuk University in 2012.
References
Crigler L, Kazhanie A, Yoon TJ, Zakhari J, Anders J, Taylor B and Virador VM: Isolation of a mesenchymal cell population from murine dermis that contains progenitors of multiple cell lineages. FASEB J. 21:2050–2063. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Giro MG, Oikarinen AI, Oikarinen H, Sephel G, Uitto J and Davidson JM: Demonstration of elastin gene expression in human skin fibroblast cultures and reduced tropoelastin production by cells from a patient with atrophoderma. J Clin Invest. 75:672–628. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schreier T, Degen E and Baschong W: Fibroblast migration and proliferation during in vitro wound healing. A quantitative comparison between various growth factors and a low molecular weight blood dialysate used in the clinic to normalize impaired wound healing. Res Exp Med (Berl). 193:195–205. 1993. | |
Allen G: Cosmetics - chemical technology or biotechnology? Int J Cosmet Sci. 6:61–69. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carpenter G and Cohen S: Epidermal growth factor. J Biol Chem. 265:7709–7712. 1990. | |
Cohen S: The receptor for epidermal growth factor functions as a tyrosyl-specific kinase. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 29:245–247. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dittmar T, Husemann A, Schewe Y, Nofer JR, Niggemann B, Zänker KS and Brandt BH: Induction of cancer cell migration by epidermal growth factor is initiated by specific phosphorylation of tyrosine 1248 of c-erbB-2 receptor via EGFR. FASEB J. 16:1823–1825. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Andl CD, Mizushima T, Nakagawa H, Oyama K, Harada H, Chruma K, Herlyn M and Rustgi AK: Epidermal growth factor receptor mediates increased cell proliferation, migration, and aggregation in esophageal keratinocytes in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 278:1824–1830. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Halleux C and Schneider YJ: Iron absorption by CaCo2 cells cultivated in serum-free medium as in vitro model of the human intestinal epithelial barrier. J Cell Physiol. 158:17–28. 1994. | |
Shiraha H, Gupta K, Drabik K and Wells A: Aging fibroblasts present reduced epidermal growth factor (EGF) responsiveness due to preferential loss of EGF receptors. J Biol Chem. 275:19343–19351. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim MK, Park KS, Lee H, Kim YD, Yun J and Bae YS: Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate stimulates chemotactic migration of L2071 mouse fibroblasts via pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins. Exp Mol Med. 39:185–194. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pata MO, Hannun YA and Ng CK: Plant sphingolipids: decoding the enigma of the Sphinx. New Phytol. 185:611–630. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Inagaki Y, Pham TT, Fujiwara Y, Kohno T, Osborne DA, Igarashi Y, Tigyi G and Parrill AL: Sphingosine 1-phosphate analogue recognition and selectivity at S1P4 within the endothelial differentiation gene family of receptors. Biochem J. 389:187–195. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takuwa N, Du W, Kaneko E, Okamoto Y, Yoshioka K and Takuwa Y: Tumor-suppressive sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-2 counteracting tumor-promoting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor-1 and sphingosine kinase 1 - Jekyll Hidden behind Hyde. Am J Cancer Res. 1:460–481. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Takuwa Y, Du W, Qi X, Okamoto Y, Takuwa N and Yoshioka K: Roles of sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling in angiogenesis. World J Biol Chem. 1:298–306. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malumbres M and Barbacid M: Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm. Nat Rev Cancer. 9:153–166. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee JP, Cha HJ, Lee KS, Lee KK, Son JH, Kim KN, Lee DK and An S: Phytosphingosine-1-phosphate represses the hydrogen peroxide-induced activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase in human dermal fibroblasts through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Arch Dermatol Res. 304:673–678. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohashi A, Imai H and Minami N: Cyclin A2 is phosphorylated during the G2/M transition in mouse two-cell embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 66:343–348. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alexandrow MG and Hamlin JL: Cdc6 chromatin affinity is unaffected by serine-54 phosphorylation, S-phase progression, and overexpression of cyclin A. Mol Cell Biol. 24:1614–1627. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yam CH, Fung TK and Poon RY: Cyclin A in cell cycle control and cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 59:1317–1326. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fung TK, Ma HT and Poon RY: Specialized roles of the two mitotic cyclins in somatic cells: cyclin A as an activator of M phase-promoting factor. Mol Biol Cell. 18:1861–1873. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ikezawa K, Ohtsubo M, Norwood TH and Narayanan AS: Role of cyclin E and cyclin E-dependent kinase in mitogenic stimulation by cementum-derived growth factor in human fibroblasts. FASEB J. 12:1233–1239. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chou JL, Fan Z, DeBlasio T, Koff A, Rosen N and Mendelsohn J: Constitutive overexpression of cyclin D1 in human breast epithelial cells does not prevent G1 arrest induced by deprivation of epidermal growth factor. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 55:267–283. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fisher D, Krasinska L, Coudreuse D and Novák B: Phosphorylation network dynamics in the control of cell cycle transitions. J Cell Sci. 125:4703–4711. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |