This article is mentioned in:

Introduction

Hyperthermia has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer. It has been suggested that the inhibition of DNA repair is one of the sensitization mechanisms (1). Indeed, it has recently been shown that BRCA2, a protein of the homologous recombination (HR) (2) pathway is a target of hyperthermia (3). Following exposure to ionizing radiation, it can take several hours to complete DNA damage repair. This depends on the repair mechanisms, the error-prone NHEJ or the error-free HR pathway. These pathways can compete with each other (4,5) in the late S- or G2-phase. This is due to the fact that HR is only active in the late S- and G2-phase, and not in the G0- or G1-phase. As hyperthermia transiently degrades BRCA2, and thereby inhibits the HR pathway, double-strand break (DSB) repair may be directed to the error-prone NHEJ pathway (4,5). In a previous study, using the comet assay and micronucleus test, it was demonstrated that exposure to hyperthermia alone at 42–48°C for 30–120 min induced genotoxic effects in human cells (6). With premature chromosome condensation and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (PCC-FISH) it was also previously shown that the combined exposure to mild hyperthermia (1 h, 41°C) and ionizing radiation induced an increase in the frequency of chromosomal translocations as compared to exposure to radiation alone shortly following exposure (7).

The interaction between hyperthermia and ionizing radiation most likely results from the inhibition of the repair of radiation-induced DNA damage by exposure to heat (8,9). Tomita (8) stated that when DNA is not repaired or is misrepaired following combined exposure to radiation and hyperthermia, cells undergo apoptosis or apoptosis is induced. In a previous study, using gel electrophoresis combined with a restriction digestion assay and Southern hybridisation, it was demonstrated that hyperthermia increases the probability of DNA DSBs being incorrectly rejoined (10). Non-rejoined, as well as misrejoined DSBs are potentially lethal for a cell. It has been found that the amount of residual DNA damage studied with gel electrophoresis (11) and PCC-FISH (12) correlated with a decrease in clonogenic survival following combined exposure to hyperthermia and irradiation (11,12). Dewey et al (13) studied metaphases following colcemid treatment, and showed that hyperthermia not only increased the number of radiation-induced chromosomal breaks, but also the frequency of chromosomal exchanges, and suggested that hyperthermia may promote misrepair. Bergs et al (7), using PCC-FISH and foci analyses, demonstrated that the increased induction of chromosomal translocations following combined exposure to hyperthermia (1 h, 41°C) and ionizing radiation may be due to the inhibition of HR. In this study, an increased frequency of chromosomal translocations was also observed in mutant cells deficient for RAD54, one of the proteins involved in HR repair. Krawczyk et al (3) demonstrated that the inhibition of recombination repair via the transient degradation of the BRCA2 protein lasts for only 6 h. All these studies were performed shortly following exposure. It would therefore be of interest to study the chromosomal aberration frequency following combined exposure to hyperthermia followed by ionizing radiation beyond that time period.

In the present study, the induction of chromosomal damage by combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation was investigated at 24 h following exposure and compared with the damage frequencies at 1 h following exposure in two different human tumor cell lines (SW-1573 and RKO). To examine chromosomal aberrations, the PCC-FISH technique was used, as previously described (14). The advantage of using the PCC technique is that chromosomal aberrations can be examined shortly following exposure. Survival curves were analysed according to the linear-quadratic (LQ) model S(D)/S(0) = exp − (αD + βD2), as previously described (15–19). Using the LQ model, changes in potentially lethal damage repair (PLDR) can be determined quantitatively by the analysis of the linear parameter α, describing the low-dose range of the survival curve, separately from the parameter β dominating the high-dose range (17,19). Furthermore, the effects of hyperthermia on the BRCA2 protein and the induction of apoptosis were examined as the possible mechanisms of radiosensitization.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The human squamous lung carcinoma cell line, SW-1573, was grown in Leibowitz-15 medium (Gibco-BRL Life Technologies, Breda, The Netherlands) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM glutamine. The cells were maintained at 37°C in an incubator with humidified air without additional CO2. The doubling time of these cells during exponential growth is approximately 24 h (20,21). The human colon cancer cell line, RKO, was grown in McCoy's 5A medium with 25 mM HEPES (Gibco-BRL Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine. The cells were maintained at 37°C in an incubator with humidified air supplemented with 5% CO2. Both cell lines (obtained from ATCC, Wesel, Germany) express wild-type (wt) p53, as can be observed in Fig. 1 which shows the induction of p53 at 4 h following exposure to hyperthermia, 4 Gy radiation and combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation. The doubling time of these cells during exponential growth is approximately 24 h (22). All experiments were performed using confluent cell cultures. Confluent cultures of RKO cells consisted of 31.2±4.7% cells in the G0/G1-phase, 50.1±4.6% in the S-phase and 18.7±3.8% cells in the G2/M-phase, as previously determined by BrdU labeling and flow cytometry (22). Confluent cultures of SW-1573 cells contained 39.6±4.7% cells in the G0/G1-phase, 48.7±5.8% in the S-phase and 11.7±7.9% cells in the G2/M-phase, as previously determined (23).

Figure 1 Induction of p53 at 4 h following exposure to hyperthermia, 4 Gy radiation or combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation, demonstrating that p53 is expressed in both cell lines studied. Control, unexposed cells; RT, radiation, HT, hyperthermia.

Clonogenic assay and the LQ model

Clonogenic assays using the SW-1573 and RKO cells were conducted as previously described by Franken et al (24). For radiation survival curves, the cells were irradiated with or without prior exposure to hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C. To investigate PLDR, the cells were plated immediately [immediately plated (ip)] and at 24 h [delayed plated (dp)] following exposure. The correlation between hyperthermia-induced radiosensitization and the induction of chromosomal damage, and the correlation between PLDR and the induction of chromosomal aberrations were investigated. Surviving fractions [S(D)/S(0)] after radiation dose (D) were corrected for the toxicity of hyperthermia alone and survival curves were analysed to calculate values of the linear and quadratic parameters α and β, using SPSS 14.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) by means of a fit of the data by weighted linear regression, according to the LQ formula: S(D)/S(0) = exp − (αD + βD2), as previously described (15–19). This equation provides a useful description of experimentally determined survival curves. Parameter α can be interpreted to represent damage induced by single track lethal damage, and parameter β represents the frequency of sublethal damage induced by two separate tracks. Potentially lethal damage is assumed to represent a part of the term αD, as well of βD2 (17,19). From the values of the LQ parameters, the enhancement factors and the PLDR value are calculated: α-EF, enhancement factor α for hyperthermia (ratio of value of αht and α); β-EF, enhancement factor β for hyperthermia (ratio of value of βht and β); PLDR-α, potentially lethal damage repair α (ratio of value of αip and αdp); PLDR-β potentially lethal damage repair β (ratio of value of βip and βdp).

Irradiation

Irradiation treatments were performed on confluent cell cultures with single doses of γ-rays from a 137Cs source at a dose rate of approximately 0.5 Gy/min. For clonogenic assays, complete survival curves were obtained and the cells were irradiated with a single dose of 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 Gy. For chromosomal aberration, apoptosis and cell cycle analysis, the cells were irradiated with a single dose of 4 Gy.

Hyperthermia

The incubation of the cells at 41°C for 1 h was performed by submerging the Petri dishes in a thermostatically controlled waterbath (Lauda aqualine AL 12; Beun de Ronde, Abcoude, The Netherlands) for 1 h. The temperature was checked in parallel dishes and the desired temperature (±0.1°C) was reached in approximately 5 min. The atmosphere of the waterbath was adjustable by a connection with air and CO2 supplies. The RKO cells were heated in a 5%CO2/95% air atmosphere with an air inflow of 2 l/min. The SW-1573 cells do not require additional CO2. In the case of combination experiments, the cells were exposed to hyperthermia for 1 h immediately prior to irradiation.

PCC-FISH and scoring of chromosomal aberrations

To examine chromosomal fragments and translocations, confluent cultures of SW-1573 and RKO cells were used. For the induction of prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCCs), the cells were incubated for 1 h with 80 nM of calyculin A at 1 h or at 24 h following exposure to hyperthermia and/or radiation (14). Preparations were obtained by a standard cytogenetic technique. The visualization of chromosomes was accomplished by FISH. The chromosomal spreads were hybridized to whole-chromosome FISH probes (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany). In the SW-1573 cells, a probe for chromosome 2 was used. The SW-1573 cells contain 3 intact copies of chromosome 2 and contain approximately 7.8% of the genome (23,25). In the RKO cells, chromosome 18 was studied as the cells contain 2 intact copies of this chromosome and contain approximately 2.5% of the genome (22). The slides were counterstained with a mixture (1:1, v/v) of 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; 2.5 µg/ml) and anti-fade solution (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The slides were examined under a fluorescence microscope (Axioscop 2; Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with suitable filter combinations (DAPI, FITC, Cy3 and a FITC/Cy3 combination) equipped with a Jenoptik (Jena, Germany) ProgRes® MF CCD camera. Translocations and fragments of painted chromosomes were scored as described earlier (7,26,27) using Isis 5.3 from MetaSystems (Altlussheim, Germany). For a comparison of the number of chromosomal aberrations using different chromosomes, corrections were made for both the copy number and size of the chromosomes. In the figures, the frequency of total translocations/cell and the total number of fragments corrected for the complete genome is presented.

Western blot analysis for p53 and BRCA2

The controls and treated cells were harvested at different time-points after treatment. Pellets were lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na2 EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 2.5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM Na3VO4 and 1 µg/ml leupeptin) for 30 min on ice with protein inhibitors, as previously described (28). Laemmli buffer with 2-mercap-toethanol (355 mM) was added to the supernatant (1:1) and heated in boiling water for 2–5 min. Finally, the samples were sonificated (Sonics and Materials, Inc., Newtown, CT, USA). Protein (1 µg) was resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Equal protein loading was checked by Ponceau S staining (28). Immunodetection was performed for BRCA2 mAb (antibodies-online.com, lot: a115912) in combination with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary anti-mouse IgG (1031-05; Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA). The housekeeping protein, ERK2, was detected using mAb (Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA) and a secondary anti-rabbit mAb (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All samples were enhanced using chemoluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Finally, the blots were analysed using the LAS4000 biomolecular imager (GE Healthcare Healthcare Europe GmbH, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

Apoptosis

Apoptosis was examined in confluent cultures of RKO and SW-1573 cells following 1 h of exposure at 41°C hyperthermia alone, following exposure to radiation (4 Gy) alone, or following combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation using the method described in the study by Riccardi and Nicoletti (29). At 1 and 24 h following exposure, the cells were collected and pellets were resuspended in Nicoletti buffer (0.1% w/v sodium citrate, 0.1% v/v Triton X-100, 50 mg/ml propidium iodide in distilled water, pH 7.4). Analyses were carried out using a flow cytometer (FACSCanto; Becton-Dickinson Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Results

Effect of exposure to hyperthermia on the number of chromosomal aberrations

Images of examples of the studied PCCs are presented in Fig. 2; however, chromatid-type aberrations were rarely observed. The effects of hyperthermia and radiation on the induction of chromosomal translocations in the SW-1573 and RKO cells are presented in Fig. 3. Exposure to hyperthermia (41°C for 1 h) alone did not increase the number of translocations at 1 or 24 h following exposure compared to the unexposed cells (Fig. 3). At 1 h following exposure to irradiation alone, a slight increase in the number of translocations compared to the untreated samples was observed. More chromosomal translocations were observed at 24 h than at 1 h after irradiation. At 1 h following combined exposure to radiation and hyperthermia, the number of translocations was higher than following exposure to irradiation alone (Fig. 3A). However, at 24 h following combined exposure, the number of translocations was lower than after radiation alone (Fig. 3B).

Figure 2 Images showing typical examples of chromosome- and chromatid-type aberrations in the studied prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCCs) in SW-1573 cells. Chromatid-type aberrations were rarely observed.

Figure 3 Frequency of translocations in SW-1573 (chromosome 2) and RKO (chromosome 18) cells. Prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCCs) were induced at (A) 1 h and (B) 24 h following exposure to hyperthermia (41°C 1 h), 4Gy of γ-radiation, or γ-radiation with prior exposure to hyperthermia (41°C 1 h). Fig. 3A is adapted from a previous study of ours (7). The means ± SD of 3 separate experiments are presented. Between 500 and 600 PCC spreads were scored for each point. cont, control (unexposed cells); Ht 41, hyperthermia at 41°C; 4 Gy, radiation at 4 Gy.

At 1 h following exposure to hyperthermia alone, in the SW-1573 cells, an increase in the frequency of chromosomal fragments as compared to the unexposed cells was observed (Fig. 4A). Exposure to radiation at 4 Gy increased the number of chromosomal fragments in both cell lines compared to the unexposed cells or exposure to hyperthermia alone (Fig. 4A). In the RKO cells, slightly more fragments were found than in the SW-1573 cells; however, this difference was not significant at 1 h following combined exposure or following exposure to radiation alone. In both cell lines, no significant differences in the number of chromosomal fragments were found following combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation, as compared to exposure to radiation alone (Fig. 4). At 24 h following exposure to 4 Gy radiation or combined exposure, the number of fragments was lower than after 1 h in both cell lines. Following combined exposure, significantly more fragments were found in the RKO cells than in the SW-1573 cells (Fig. 4B). At 4 h following exposure, the results of chromosomal aberrations did not differ from the results obtained at the 1 h time-point (data not shown). However, the difference in the number of translocations following combined exposure compared to exposure to radiation alone was not significant.

Figure 4 Frequency of chromosomal fragments in SW-1573 (chromosome 2) and RKO (Prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCCs) were induced at (A) 1 h and (B) 24 h following exposure to hyperthermia (41°C 1 h), 4 Gy of γ-radiation or γ-radiation with prior exposure to hyperthermia (41°C 1 h). Fig. 4A is adapted from a previous study of ours (7). Fig. 4B is adapted from a previous study of ours (12). The means ± SD of 3 experiments are presented. Between 500 and 600 PCC spreads were scored for each point. cont, control (unexposed cells); Ht 41, hyperthermia at 41°C; 4 Gy, radiation at 4 Gy.

Effect of pre-exposure to hyperthermia on clonogenic cell survival following the exposure of SW-1573 and RKO cells to ionizing radiation

To determine whether exposure to mild hyperthermia (41°C) can enhance cellular radiosensitivity, clonogenic assays were conducted. Exposure of the cells to hyperthermia (1 h, 41°C) alone had minimal effects and resulted in a surviving fraction of 0.8±0.4 in the ip cells and of 0.9±0.1 in dp cells for both cell lines. In the SW-1573 cells (Fig. 5A and B), exposure to hyperthermia at 41°C resulted in a modest radiosensitization. This was due to an effect on the quadratic parameter β (Table I). Pre-exposure of the RKO cells to hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C significantly enhanced cellular radiosensitivity both in the ip and dp cells (Fig. 5C and D). Calculations with the LQ model showed that this was due to an increase in both the linear parameter α and the quadratic parameter β (Table I). The clonogenic survival of the cells at 24 h following irradiation was higher than the survival of the cells plated immediately after irradiation (Fig. 5). This is most clear from the values of PLDR, which for α are all higher than 1 and for some of the β's where the PLDR values are higher than 1 (Table I).

Figure 5 Radiation dose survival curves of confluent cultures of (A and B) SW-1573 and (C and D) RKO cells plated (A and C) 1 h after irradiation, ip or (B and D) 24 h after irradiation, dp with or without prior exposure to hyperthermia at 41°C for 1 h. The means ± SEM of at least 3 experiments are shown.

Table I Effect of hyperthermia on LQ parameters α and β, the hyperthermia α-enhancement factor and β-enhancement factor and the PLDR-α and PLDR-β in SW-1573 and RKO cells.

Table I

Effect of hyperthermia on LQ parameters α and β, the hyperthermia α-enhancement factor and β-enhancement factor and the PLDR-α and PLDR-β in SW-1573 and RKO cells.

	LQ parameter
Cell line	α (Gy−1)	β (Gy−2)	α-EF	β-EF	PLDR-α	PLDR-β
SW-1573 ip	0.21±0.02	0.06±0.02
SW1573 41 ip	0.06±0.02	0.11±0.03	0.3±0.2	1.8±0.8
SW-1573 dp	0.09±0.02	0.06±0.02			2.3±0.6	1.0±0.5
SW-1573 41 dp	0.05±0.02	0.08±0.02	0.6±0.2	1.3±0.5	1.2±1.1	1.4±0.5
RKO ip	0.55±0.09	0.02±0.01
RKO 41 ip	0.80±0.09	0.05±0.02	1.5±0.5	2.5±1.3
RKO dp	0.47±0.09	0.01±0.01			1.2±0.3	2.0±1.4
RKO 41 dp	0.64±0.11	0.05±0.02	1.4±0.4	5.0±2.5	1.3±0.3	1.0±0.2

[i] Cells with or without prior exposure to hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C for cells plated immediately (ip) after radiation and cells plated at a delayed time point (dp) at 24 h after irradiation. α-EF, enhancement factor α for hyperthermia (ratio of value of α_ht and α); β-EF, enhancement factor β for hyperthermia (ratio of value of β_ht and β); PLDR-α, potentially lethal damage repair α (ratio of value of α_ip and α_dp); PLDR-β, potentially lethal damage repair β (ratio of value of β_ip and β_dp).

Effect of hyperthermia on BRCA2

The effect of hyperthermia on the BRCA2 levels were examined by western blot analysis (Fig. 6). A clear decrease in the BRCA2 protein level was observed for up to 5 h following exposure to hyperthermia. In the RKO cells, BRCA2 was almost completely degraded, while in the SW-1573 cells, BRCA2 could still be detected. However, in the SW-1573 cells, the BRCA2 levels following exposure to hyperthermia were somewhat lower than in the unexposed control cells. At 24 h, the BRCA2 levels returned levels similar to those of the controls.

Figure 6 Western blot analyses of SW-1573 (SW) and RKO cells at 0–5 and 24 h following exposure to hyperthermia at 41°C for 1 h. Control, unexposed cells; RT, radiation, HT, hyperthermia.

Induction of apoptosis following the exposure of SW-1573 and RKO cells to hyperthermia and radiation

Nicoletti assay was performed to explore the effects of apoptosis following exposure to hyperthermia combined with exposure to radiation. At 1 h after exposure, no apoptotic DNA fragments were detected in both the RKO and SW-1573 cells (Fig. 7). In the RKO cells, exposure to hyperthermia alone induced apoptosis in 5% of the population at 24 h after exposure (Fig. 7B). Following combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation, apoptosis increased to approximately 20%. In the SW-1573 cells, on the other hand, apoptosis hardly played a role in exposure-induced cell death (Fig. 7A).

Figure 7 Mean percentages of apoptosis at 1 and 24 h following exposure in (A) SW-1573 and (B) RKO cells. Results are presented as the means ± SD; *p<0.05 as compared to control (unexposed cells). RT, radiation, HT, hyperthermia.

Discussion

Hyperthermia is a very potent radio- and chemosensitizer, that can already be effective at mild temperatures (30–36). Hyperthermia is therefore often applied as adjuvant anticancer therapy (37). Heat may interfere with the normal IR-induced signaling required for chromosomal DNA DSB repair, thus resulting in increased cellular radiosensitivity (37). However, it has been described that hyperthermia alone at 42–48°C for 30–120 min also induces genotoxic effects in human A549 cells (6). The increased frequency of micronuclei was only found following exposure at 45°C or at higher temperatures. Bergs et al (7) showed that pre-exposure to mild hyperthermia increased the frequency of radiation-induced chromosomal translocation.

In the present study, we showed that although exposure to mild hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C prior to exposure to radiation increased the frequency of translocations at 1 h after exposure, these genotoxic effects were not further enhanced at 24 h after exposure. At this time-point, the frequency of translocations following combined exposure was even lower than after 4 Gy alone. Translocations result from the erroneous rejoining of chromosomal fragments by DNA repair processes. It was suggested by El-Awady et al (10) that hyperthermia inhibits the rejoining of correct chromosome ends, leading to an increased frequency of chromosomal fragments and increases the probability of DNA DSB misrepair (10,12) shortly after exposure. That this effect is not augmented at 24 h after exposure is in agreement with the temporary hyperthermia-induced inhibition of HR which lasts for up to 6 h (3). This corresponds well with our observation in this study, that the BRCA2 protein levels were decreased as compared to the control cells for up to 5 h after exposure. At 24 h after exposure, BRCA2 could be detected again in both cell lines. In the SW-1573 cells, the effect of hyperthermia on BRCA2 was less clear than in the RKO cells. The RKO cells were radiosensitized by exposure to hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C, and the SW-1573 cells were not radiosensitized. However, the lower number of chromosomal translocations found at 24 h after combined exposure may also be caused by cell death. As mainly G2 PCCs were studied, chromatid breaks were expected as well. These were observed, although the numbers were insufficient to quantify. This may be due to the PCC calyculin technique which made the accurate determination of the aberration type not possible. This was acknowledged earlier by Coco-Martin and Begg (38), who also studied chemically-induced PCCs with FISH. Moreover, we also observed that exposure to hyperthermia induced chromatin conformational changes, so that the resolution became lower.

It has been demonstrated that hyperthermia has differential effects on the LQ parameters of SW-1573 and RKO cells (31,32). In the thermosensitive RKO cells (31,32), hyperthermia clearly increased the values of α and β, for cells plated immediately and delayed after exposure. In the less thermosensitive SW-1573 cells (31,32) on the other hand, pre-exposure to hyperthermia only increased the value of β. These findings indicate that exposure to hyperthermia for 1 h at 41°C sensitizes RKO cells at low and high radiation doses and that SW-1573 cells are only sensitized after high doses of radiation (31,32). The ability of mild temperature (in the range of 40–42°C) hyperthermia to increase the radiosensitivity of human tumor cells has been shown to be cell line-dependent (33). This effect is also dependent on the capability of the cell to repair DNA damage following combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation (34,35). The relation between cell survival and chromosomal aberrations following combined exposure remains unclear, as only the RKO cells were radiosensitized at this temperature and the dynamics of translocation frequencies are about similar.

Furthermore, we showed that when the cells were plated at 24 h after exposure, the survival levels were higher than when the cells were plated directly after treatment. The repair of potentially lethal damage after radiation, which is responsible for the higher survival levels after delayed plating as compared to immediate plating is a well-known phenomenon (17,39). This was also demonstrated by the lower values of the LQ parameters after delayed plating as compared to these values for immediately plated cells. The significantly lower frequency of chromosomal fragments in both cell lines at 24 h after irradiation alone as compared to 1 h after exposure correlates well with the repair of potentially lethal damage. However, following combined exposure, in the RKO cells, the frequency of chromosomal fragments remained at the level found at 1 h after exposure. This may be due to the induction of apoptosis which was not observed in the SW-1573 cells. In the SW-1573 cells, no difference in fragment frequency was found between exposure to radiation alone and combined exposure. From this it was concluded that apoptosis, which may be induced by chromosomal damage or depletion of the BRCA2 protein, is at least partly responsible for the hyperthermia-induced radiosensitization of RKO cells. This was also observed by Tomita (8) who stated that when DNA is not repaired or is misrepaired following combined exposure to radiation and hyperthermia, cells undergo apoptosis. There remains however, a discrepancy between the apoptosis and chromosomal aberration studies, as apoptosis can be examined on the whole cell population, while chromosomal aberrations using PCC cannot be performed on the S-phase cell population.

Radiosensitization induced by exposure to hyperthermia at a temperature of 41°C was observed in the RKO cells, but was only very modest in the SW-1573 cells. Chromosomal translocations were probably not responsible for this sensitization, as the induction of translocations following exposure to radiation alone and combined exposure followed the same trend in both cell lines. This has been described earlier by Tucker et al (40).

In conclusion, our findings indicate that the increase in the translocation frequency observed at 1 h following combined exposure to hyperthermia and radiation is not present at 24 h. Exposure to hyperthermia increased the death of RKO cells, and this was at least partly due to apoptosis. The repair of potentially lethal damage, as shown by the decrease in chromosomal aberrations at 24 h as compared to 1 h after exposure is responsible for the higher survival levels after delayed plating.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the Maurits and Anne de Cock and the Nijbakker Morra Foundations for providing the fluorescence microscopes with the software for scoring chromosomal aberrations. The Stichting Vanderes and the Dutch Cancer Society (nos. UVA 2008-4019 and UVA 2012-5540) are acknowledged for personnel financial support.

References