Predictive value of the sFlt‑1/PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia: An update (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 9, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2023.5292
- Article Number: 89
-
Copyright: © Velegrakis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
1. Introduction
Normal pregnancy is associated with significant maternal cardiovascular hemodynamic alterations, necessary for the optimal development of the growing fetus and the protection of the mother (1,2). Maternal blood volume progressively increases from the first weeks of gestation and reaches a peak of 40-50% above non-pregnant volumes at ~34-36 weeks of gestation, where it remains at these levels until term (1,3,4). The increase in maternal blood volume is required to provide increased blood flow throughout the placenta, a highly vascular organ, which is the primary site for maternal-fetal exchange of nutrients, gases and waste. Placental vascular network development requires vasculogenesis, and branching and non-branching angiogenesis, which are regulated by the coordination between different vascular endothelial growth factors and cell types (5). The dysregulation of placental vascular development leads to placental dysfunction associated with various serious obstetric complications, such as preeclampsia (PE), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), pre-term birth and stillbirth (5,6).
PE is a pregnancy-specific multisystem disorder, affecting 2-7% of all pregnancies (7,8). It is a major cause of maternal and fetal/perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide (15-20% in developed countries), leading to ~70,000 direct maternal deaths and ~500,000 perinatal deaths annually (7,9). The main criteria for the clinical diagnosis of PE are the new onset of hypertension and proteinuria or in the absence of proteinuria, new-onset hypertension with the new onset of any of the following: Thrombocytopenia, elevated levels of liver transaminases, pulmonary edema, new-onset renal insufficiency, or cerebral or visual disturbances (8). Moreover, women who develop PE are at an increased risk of also developing cardiovascular complications later on in life (7). PE is classified as early-onset PE (EOPE), which accounts for 5-20% of all PE cases and develops prior to 34 weeks of gestation and late-onset (LOPE), which accounts for 80-95% of cases worldwide and develops after 34 weeks of gestation (10,11). EOPE is usually more severe and is associated with a high rate of IUGR, while LOPE is associated with eclampsia and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets (HELLP) (10,11).
Although it is commonly acknowledged that PE is caused by placental dysfunction, its underlying pathophysiology remains incompletely understood (7). In 1991, Redman (12) introduced the two-stage model of PE pathophysiology: Stage 1 (preclinical, placental stage), which occurs during the 1st half of pregnancy, is caused by placental dysfunction with unremodeling of spiral arteries and uteroplacental malperfusion, leading to placental hypoxia (ischemia); and stage 2 (clinical, maternal stage), which occurs during the 2nd half of the pregnancy and is hypothesized to be a consequence of stage 1, as hypoxic placenta causes the increased release of numerous biological factors into the maternal circulation leading to endothelial dysfunction (Fig. 1A). An updated two-stage model was suggested in 2019 (11), in which at least two or more different pathways lead to stage 1 (Fig. 1B). The extrinsic placental pathway, is the classical dysfunctional placentation pathway leading to secondary syncytiotrophoblast (STB) stress and the release of pro-inflammatory factors into the maternal circulation, which develops early in pregnancy and leads to EOPE accompanied very often by IUGR. The intrinsic placental pathway arises due to the placental outgrowing uterine capacity with restricted intervillous perfusion, also causing STB stress, which develops late in pregnancy and leads to LOPE with normal fetal growth (11). Another potential pathway leading to STB stress is the excessive trophoblast senescence of ageing placenta. STB stress has been shown to stimulate the release of multiple factors in the maternal circulation including hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, endothelin-1, syncytiotrophoblast microparticles, angiotensin II 1 receptor autoantibodies (AT1-AA), nitric oxide (NO), oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress and angiogenic factors and their receptors (13,14). The updated model also incorporates maternal factors, including genetic, genetic, behavioral, immunological and environmental factors, which may affect both stages of PE.
2. Angiogenic growth factors and their receptors in PE
In normal placental vasculogenesis, extravillous cytotrophoblasts invade the myometrium spiral arteries and replace the endothelial layer of the uterine vessels, transforming them into elastic, soft, wide, low-resistance blood vessels, thus allowing increased uterine blood flow and adequate oxygen and nutrients supplies to the fetus (Fig. 2) (5,6,15). In PE, there is trophoblast dysfunction and the incomplete remodeling of spiral uterine arteries, causing placental hypoxia, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction responsible for the clinical symptoms (Fig. 2) (6,15-22). Interactions between angiogenic factors and their receptors contribute to placental angiogenic balance and are responsible for the maintenance and development of the placental vasculature (Fig. 2) (5,15,23-26).
VEGF and PlGF belong to the VEGF family and have angiogenic properties, while sFlt-1 and sEng exert anti-angiogenic effects (6). Reference values for pro- and anti-angiogenic factors and their protein tyrosine kinase receptors (VEGFRs) in the serum of normal pregnant women have been established (27) and different serum concentrations of these factors have been found in women with PE compared to those in women with normotensive pregnancies, indicating their inolvement in the pathogenesis of PE (Fig. 2) (5,6,13-15,18-22). The complex etiology and pathophysiology of PE emphasizes the need for a clinically useful biochemical marker for the diagnosis and subsequent prediction and management of PE.
VEGF (or VEGF-A) is a member of the human VEGF family, which also includes VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and PlGF, and their signals are mediated by their receptors, VEGFR-1/sFlt-1, VEGFR-2/KDR and VEGFR-3/Flt-4 (6,20,21,26,28). VEGF is produced by several cell types, including macrophages, keratinocytes, T-cells, tumor cells and cytotrophoblasts, and plays a key role in the regulation and differentiation of the vascular system (6,20,21,26,28). VEGF-A in the placenta induces vascular permeability and endothelial cell proliferation, maintains the integrity of newly formed capillaries and regulates trophoblast proliferation, differentiation and invasion (6,20). VEGF is a 45-kDa glycoprotein encoded by the VEGF gene, which is located on chromosome 6p21.1 (28,29). Through alternative mRNA splicing, several VEGF-A subtypes are generated, with VEGF-A165 being the predominant one (26,28).
PlGF was first identified in a placenta cDNA library in 1991 (30). It belongs to the cysteine-knot growth factor family and it has both angiogenic and pro-inflammatory functions (6,31). PlGF is expressed in trophoblasts, endothelial and epithelial cells, the skin, certain tumors, and the heart, lungs, thyroid and skeletal muscle (31). PIGF is a 45-50-kDa dimeric glycoprotein produced by the PIGF gene, which is located on chromosome 14q24 (6,31). Due to alternative mRNA splicing, four isoforms are encoded composed of 131, 152, 203 and 224 amino acids (31). PlGF shares a 53% homology with VEGF (6,30,31).
VEGF binds with high affinity to both sFlt-1 and KDR receptors and promotes branching angiogenesis (first trimester of pregnancy), while PlGF binds with high affinity exclusively to sFlt-1 and leads to non-branching angiogenesis (second trimester) (5,6,26,31-33). sFlt-1 and KDR receptors both have an extra cellular ligand binding domain, a transmembrane domain and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain (6,15).
The Flt-1 gene is located on chromosome 13q12 and encodes a 186-kDa glycoprotein (6,15,34). The sFlt-1 protein is a splice variant of VEGFR-1, a 100-kDa variably glycosylated protein, which includes the extracellular ligand-binding domain and lacks the transmembrane and intracellular domains, thus it is secreted (soluble), and acts as a VEGF and PlGF antagonist, thus preventing their activity (15,26,33,34). sFlt1 is found in endothelial cells, monocytes, trophoblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, dendritic cells, renal mesangial cells and various human tumor cell types (6,15,33). Multiple isoforms of sFlt1 have been reported, which are differentially expressed and distributed in human tissues, and may be associated with a variety of physiological and pathological roles (34,35). In humans, sFLT-1 i13 is the main sFLT-1 variant and is widely expressed in the majority of tissues, whereas the sFLT-1 e15a variant appears to be the main protein in the circulation of women with PE (34,35). Although sFLt-1 placental derivation is well known, the upstream mechanisms regulating its release are poorly characterized. A recent study identified that epidermal growth factor receptor and mitochondrial signaling pathways positively regulated the placental release of sFlt-1 and may play central roles in the pathogenesis of PE (36).
Other factors have also been observed in the plasma of women with PE, such as increased sEng, NO, AT1-AA, cellular fibronectin and decreased heme oxygenase-1 and prostacyclin levels, suggesting a possible involvement in the pathogenesis of PE (Fig. 3) (19,37).
3. PlGF and sFlt-1 in PE
Extensive research has demonstrated the role of VEGF angiogenic factors and their receptors in the pathophysiology of PE and numerous scientists have been focused on their evaluation as candidate biomarkers in order to develop an efficient screening test with diagnostic and predictive potential for PE (6,15-19). Free VEGF plasma concentrations during pregnancy are low and often below the detection limit of most commercially available diagnostic kits (18).
Increased levels of sFlt-1 and decreased levels of PlGF in maternal serum have been observed from early pregnancy in women with PE, suggesting a blockade of PlGF action by sFlt-1 (15-20,33,38-59) (Table I). In 2003, Maynard et al (38) demonstrated almost 5-fold higher placental and serum sFlt-1 levels in women with PE compared to normotensive pregnant women. Of note, the sFlt-1 levels decreased in preeclamptic women 48 h after delivery, suggesting its placental origin (38). Moreover, decreased levels of free serum VEGF and PlGF were found in patients with PE compared to normal controls, which was proportionate to the rise in serum sFlt1 levels in these patients (38). Another two studies demonstrated significantly higher serum levels of sFlt-1 (an almost 6-fold increase) and lower free PlGF levels in women with PE than those from non-pregnant women (16,17).
In 2004, Levine et al (18) demonstrated an increase in serum sFlt-1 concentrations 5 weeks prior to the onset of PE with a parallel decrease in the free PlGF and VEGF levels, which may have been due to sFlt-1 binding. In addition, they demonstrated an association between serum sFlt-1 levels and the severity of the disease (18). In normotensive pregnancy, the serum sFlt-1 levels were increased and PlGF levels were decreased during the last 2 months of pregnancy (18). Their study suggested the relevance of these markers to the early identification of PE and the prediction of its severity (18).
Thadhani et al (39) suggested that the combination of first trimester serum sFlt-1 and PlGF levels can identify women who are at a high risk of developing PE. A subsequent study concluded that the plasma sFlt-1 concentration began to increase 6-10 weeks prior to the clinical manifestations of PE with a more pronounced increase at 2-5 weeks before the diagnosis, as well as at clinical presentation (40). Furthermore, it was observed that the plasma sFlt-1 concentration increased both in early- and late-onset disease, although in EOPE the elevation occurred earlier than in LOPE; it was thus suggested that the optimal time for the determination of plasma sFlt-1 concentrations for diagnostic purposes was at 28-32 weeks of gestation for EOPE and at 30-34 weeks of gestation for LOPE, or ~1 month before its clinical diagnosis (40).
Buhimschi et al (41) observed that the urinary sFlt-1-to-PlGF (uFP) ratio had a high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating women with severe PE from normotensive controls, as well as other hypertensive disorders; it was suggested that the uFP ratio would be a better indicator for defining the severity of the disease (41).
Hirashima et al (27) established the reference values for serum sFlt-1, free PlGF and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with a 90% confidence interval (90% CI) throughout pregnancy, useful for identifying pregnant women who are at a high risk of developing PE. In normal pregnancies, the serum concentration of sFlt-1 decreased from 8-12 weeks to 16-20 weeks, gradually increased at 26-30 weeks and rapidly increased at 35-39 weeks of gestation, while the serum free PlGF concentration increased from 8-12 weeks to 26-30 weeks and then decreased at 35-39 weeks of gestation, implying that the cut-off value for PE should be changed according to the gestational period (27). Furthermore, in women with PE, they indicated a decrease in serum free PlGF levels in both the first and the second trimester prior to the onset of PE, and they reported that higher serum sFlt-1 levels after 21 weeks of gestation, but not before 21 weeks, was probably associated with an increased risk of developing PE (27).
Using the newly developed reference values, Ohkuchi et al (42) observed that women with EOPE and LOPE exhibited decreased serum levels of PlGF and increased serum levels of sFlt-1 compared to normotensive controls at 28 and 37 weeks, with more pronounced changes in EOPE than in LOPE. In addition, they found that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratios at ~28 weeks of gestation prior to the onset of severe PE were increased in 83% of cases, suggesting its role as s putative marker for the prediction of both early- and late-onset PE (42). Levine et al (37) concluded that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in women with PE began to increase 2 to 3 months prior to the onset of the disease and was more strongly predictive of PE than were individual biomarkers.
In 2007, Stepan et al (43) demonstrated significantly higher serum levels of sFlt1 and lower levels of PlGF in pregnancies with adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with those with normal outcomes, with more noticeable alterations in pregnancies with subsequent PE compared with IUGR and in early-onset diseases (delivery <34 weeks) compared with late-onset diseases. Moreover, they concluded that the concurrent measurement of uterine perfusion with Doppler sonography and angiogenic factors may be a useful tool for the prediction of early-onset pregnancy complications, particularly PE (43).
De Vivo et al (44), found that the serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio increased during gestation in both the PE and control group in both trimesters; however, in the control group, the increase was moderate (51%), while in the PE group, the increase was prominent (285%) due to the significant decrease in serum PlGF levels in the third trimester in this group. Romero et al (45) demonstrated that women who delivered an IUGR neonate had changes in the plasma concentration of pro- and anti-angiogenic factors from the first trimester of pregnancy onwards, indicating that differences in their response to intrauterine insults may determine whether a patient will deliver an IUGR neonate, develop PE, or both (45).
All the aforementioned studies relied exclusively on ELISA kits and their results could not be used in clinical practice. The need for a rapid and reliable diagnostic test led to the introduction of automated, commercially available systems for the determination of sFlt-1 and PlGF levels. In 2010, Ohkuchi et al (46) introduced automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay systems; they demonstrated in only 18 min, that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio had the optimal diagnostic power for both EOPE and LOPE and that a cut-off value of 85 may assist in the diagnosis of PE, particularly for EOPE (46). In addition, Verlohren et al (47) evaluated the newly developed automated Elecsys (Roche Diagnostics, GmbH) assay and they confirmed the results of the aformentioned study, demonstrating that the cut-off value of 85 for the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio had a 82% sensitivity and 95% specificity for diagnosing PE. Notably, for EOPE, the same cut-off value had a 89% sensitivity and 97% specificity, indicating the usefulness of this platform for the establishment of a reliable test that could be used as a diagnostic tool in obstetrics. In a subsequent study, Sunderji et al (48), using a novel automated immunoassay (Beckman Coulter), revealed that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was the optimal biomarker for the separation of normotensive women from those with pre-term PE. They also demonstrated the potential of the markers to differentiate pregnant women with chronic hypertension and PE from those with chronic hypertension only (48).
Chaiworapongsa et al (49) demonstrated that the plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors are of prognostic value in the obstetrical triage area in identifying patients with severe PE requiring pre-term delivery within 2 weeks, strengthening their clinical value in obstetrics for better management of at-risk patients. Subsequent studies confirmed the usefulness of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measurement in the triage. Rana et al (50) indicated that a plasma sFlt1/PlGF ratio >85 at presentation was predictive of adverse outcomes occurring within 2 weeks and that in these women, this marker had better results than other laboratory tests currently used to predict such outcomes. In another study, Moore et al (51) demonstrated that an increased serum sFlt1/PlGF ratio was associated with an increased risk of complications among women presenting <37 weeks and that multivariable model combining the sFlt1:PlGF ratio with clinical variables was more predictive of complications than a model using clinical variables alone.
In a following multicenter study, Verlohren et al (52) performed serum sFlt-1 and PlGF measurements using the fully automated Elecsys system and they reported significantly elevated sFlt-1/PlGF ratios in patients with PE compared to the controls and to patients with chronic and gestational hypertension at <34 weeks and ≥34 weeks, thus allowing the discrimination between different types of pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders. Moreover, it was shown for the first time that patients with a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the highest quartile (P<0.001) had a significantly reduced time to delivery. It was noted that particularly in the <34 weeks PE group, the early identification of high risk for delivery women was strongly associated with maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality as and the timely referral to an intensive care unit alone could reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality by 20% (52). Herraiz et al (53) observed increased serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratios in cases with fetal growth restriction, PE or HELLP, and PE or HELLP and fetal growth restriction than control pregnancies both <34 weeks and ≥34 weeks of gestation.
In 2014, Chaiworapongsa et al (54) demonstrated that the maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors have prognostic value for patients presenting to the obstetrical triage area with suspected PE before 34 weeks of gestation and that these biomarkers allow for the prospective categorization of patients requiring pre-term delivery or who are at risk of adverse maternal and/or neonatal outcomes. Rana et al (55) observed that women with a non-angiogenic form of PE (sFlt-1/PlGF ratio <85) had very low risk of adverse outcomes.
Gómez-Arriaga et al (56) demonstrated that the mean uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in combination with gestational age were useful for the prognostic assessment of perinatal complications at the time of diagnosis of EOPE, but not of maternal complications. Furthermore, they proposed that a serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >655 was closely related to the need to deliver within 48 h (56). Garcia-Tizon Larroca et al (57) concluded that screening by biophysical and biochemical testing at 30-33 weeks could identify the majority of pregnancies developing PE and requiring delivery within the subsequent 4 weeks.
In 2014, Verlohren et al (58) demonstrated that the use of individual two cut-off values, one for EOPE and one for LOPE allowed for the maximized accuracy of diagnosis. For EOPE, between 20+ 0 and 33+ 6 weeks of gestation, the cut-off value at ≤33 was negative and at ≥85 was positive for PE/HELLP syndrome with a sensitivity/specificity of 95/94% and 88/99.5%, respectively and for LOPE, ≥34 weeks, the cut-off values at ≤33 and ≥110 resulted in a lower sensitivity/specificity of 89.6/73.1 and 58.2/95.5%, respectively. Schoofs et al (59) indicated that repeated measurements of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio along with or in addition to calculating the slope between two measurements appeared to be superior in predicting PE to a single measurement of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone.
4. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio as second and third trimester diagnostic biomarkers for the prediction of PE
Hypertension and proteinuria are currently the classical clinical criteria used to diagnose PE, which however, develop after 20 weeks of pregnancy and their positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting severe adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes was only 20% (60,61). Aspirin administration commenced in early pregnancy before 16 weeks of pregnancy has been proven to reduce the risk of developing PE by ~50% (62). Therefore, the development of an effective screening test to identify women who are at a high risk of developing PE early in pregnancy is of utmost importance; this would prevent pre-term birth, facilitating both maternal and fetal outcomes and decreasing healthcare costs associated with hospitalization. Women who are at a high risk would benefit from often and intensive surveillance, and drug administration for the optimal birth time.
Extensive research has provided evidence that angiogenic factors and their receptors may be used as biomarkers, either alone or in combination with other markers, for predicting PE (Table II). The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio appears to be the optimal predictive tool and several national societies, including the German Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the National Institute for Care and Health Excellence, the Italian Advisory Board, the Swiss Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, have published a guidance regarding PlGF-based diagnostic testing for suspected PE and how clinicians should implement this testing in order to improve patient safety and to deliver benefits to the healthcare system (63-65). The recommended cut-off values for the Elecsys immunoassay sFlt-1/PLGF ratio in these guidelines are of 33, 38, 85 and 110, with 38 and 85 being the mostly used (63-65).
Table IIsFlt-1/PlGF ratio as second and third trimester diagnostic biomarkers for the prediction of PE. |
The PRediction of short-term Outcome in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study (PROGNOSIS) was the first clinical study designed to demonstrate the utility of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the short-term (up to 4 weeks) prediction of PE using Elecsys immunoassays for sFlt-1 and PlGF (66). PROGNOSIS was conducted between 2010-2013 in 14 countries and demonstated that among pregnant women at <37 weeks of gestation, an sFLT-1:PIGF ratio ≤38 can accurately rule out the likelihood of developing PE in the subsequent week, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.3%, with 80% sensitivity and 78.3% specificity. It was also demonstrated that an sFLT-1:PIGF ratio >38 can accurately predict PE/HELLP within 4 weeks, with a PPV of 36.7%, with 66.2% sensitivity and 83.1% specificity (66,67).
The Preeclampsia Open Study (PreOS) was the first prospective, multicenter study in pregnant women with suspected PE aiming to evaluate the clinical utility of the fully automated Elecsys sFlt-1/PlGF test in the diagnosis of PE and how it influences their clinical management (68). Its results demonstrated that the use of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio influenced clinical decision-making towards appropriate hospitalization in a considerable proportion of women with suspected PE (69).
Perales et al (70) performed the Study of Early Pre-eclampsia in Spain (STEPS) study in order to evaluate the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio at 20, 24 and 28 weeks as a predictive marker for EOPE (<34 weeks). They found that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was significantly increased in women with EOPE compared to those with LOPE and the controls, and they developed a prediction model for EOPE combining sFlt-1/PlGF ratio with considerably increased specificity and sensitivity compared with using UtA-PI or sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone (70).
Herraiz et al (71) designed a study to analyze the usefulness of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measurement at 24-28 weeks for the prediction of early (requiring delivery <32 weeks), intermediate (delivery at 32 to <36 weeks) and late (delivery ≥36 weeks) PE/IUGR. Their results demonstrated the sFlt1/PlGF ratio measurement was useful in previously selected women to predict mostly early PE/IUGR, with optimal diagnostic accuracy for values >95th centile as the cut-off (71).
Sabriá et al (72) evaluated the effectiveness of N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), which is released from cardiac myocytes in response to myocardial stretch or ischemia and is increased in women with PE, uric acid and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >38 for the prediction of delivery within 1 week. They observed that the addition of NT-proBNP assessment yields superior results for the prediction of delivery with PE in the subsequent week compared with the use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio alone (72). Lafuente-Ganuza et al (73) conducted a study for identifying and validating cut-off values for the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and NT-proBNP predictive model of EOPE and they demonstrated that two sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off values of 23 and 45 can rule out and rule in EOPE at any time between 24 and 33+6 weeks of gestation.
In the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study, Sovio et al (74) demonstrated that an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio >38 at 28 weeks had a 32% PPV for PE and pre-term birth, with a similar PPV in both high- and low-risk women and at 36 weeks, it had 20% PPV for severe PE in high-risk women and 6.4% in low-risk women. At 36 weeks, an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio >110 had a PPV of 30% for severe PE, and the PPV was similar comparing low- and high-risk women (74). Among low-risk women at 36 weeks, an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≤38 had a NPV value for severe PE of 99.2%, indicating that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio provides clinically useful prediction of the risk of the most important manifestations of preeclampsia in a cohort of unselected nulliparous women (74).
An exploratory post hoc analysis of data from the PROGNOSIS study by Zeisler et al (75) demonstrated that a sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≤38 can rule out the onset of PE for up to 4 weeks in women with suspected PE (24+0 to 36+6 weeks' gestation) with a NPV of 94.3% and that repeat testing of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in these women could further elucidate the risk of developing PE.
PROGNOSIS Asia was a prospective, multicenter study conducted at 25 sites in Asia designed to investigate the value of the sFlt-/PlGF ratio for predicting adverse outcomes (76). The NPV for ruling out preeclampsia within 1 week using an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio of ≤38 was 98.6%, with 76.5% sensitivity and 82.1% specificity and the PPV of a >38 sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for ruling in preeclampsia within 4 weeks was 30.3% with 62.0% sensitivity and 83.9% specificity (76).
Cerdeira et al (77) performed the Interventional Study Evaluating the Short-Term Prediction of Preeclampsia/Eclampsia In Pregnant Women With Suspected Preeclampsia (INSPIRE) study, the first randomized clinical trial for assessing the use of angiogenic biomarkers sFlt-1/PlGF using a ratio cut-off of 38. They yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a NPV of 100% compared with a sensitivity of 83.3% and NPV of 97.8% with clinical practice alone, indicating that the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in combination with standard clinical practice both identifies and leads to correct admission of women with increased risks of preeclampsia without changing the admission rate (77). Cerdeira et al (78) performed a post hoc analysis of the INSPIRE trial and their finding that the sFlt-1/PlGF-ratio at the cut-off of 85 predicts PE within 4 weeks with a PPV of 71.4% confirmed the predictive utility of this cutoff and suggested that combining this cut-off of 85 with the rule out cut-off of 38 could improve the management of patients with suspected PE.
Perry et al (79) demonstrated that the combination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio and maternal characteristics could predict a PE-related delivery within 1 and 2 weeks, particularly in gestational ages <35 weeks, and they emphasized the superior performance of a continuous scale of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the model.
Dröge et al (64) performed the first retrospective real-world study in order to evaluate the clinical use of serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio cut-off values of 38 and 85 alone or integrating into a multi-marker model for the prediction of adverse maternal of fetal outcomes. They observed that the addition of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to a multi-marker model including maternal characteristics and routine clinical examination improved the predictive validity (64).
Peguero et al (80) measured the levels of PlGF, sFlt-1 and the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio from admission and before delivery at fixed time points, and demonstrated that longitudinal changes in maternal angiogenic factors levels improved the predictive capacity for EOPE with adverse outcomes and time interval to delivery.
Dathan-Stumpf et al (81) in a real-world study with sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measurements at admission and follow-up measurements before delivery and confirming previous studies they observed a positive correlation between the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and severity of placental dysfunction and a negative association with time to delivery.
Hughes et al (65) evaluated the sFlt-1/PlGF value for predicting PE and they demonstrated that in participants at <37 weeks of gestation, an sFlt-1/PlGF ratio ≤38 ruled out PE in the subsequent week with a NPV of 96.2% and ruled in PE within 4 weeks with a PPV of 75%; these results were comparable to those reported in international trials, indicating the predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in PE and emphasizing its incorporation into national guidelines.
Kifle et al (82) designed a secondary analysis of INSPIRE trial in order to compare the prognostic utility of models using the continuous values of sFlt-1, PIGF, sFlt-1/PIGF ratio or sFlt-1/PIGF ratio as a cut-off at 38 for predicting PE within 7 days of screening among women with suspected PE. They observed that models using continuous values of sFlt-1 only or sFlt-1/PIGF ratio had a better predictive performance compared to a PIGF only or the model with sFlt-1/PIGF ratio as a cut-off at 38 (82).
5. sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in first trimester prediction models for PE
Considerable efforts have been made to develop first trimester prediction models for PE, which need to be evaluated and undergo external validation in an independent population with different demographics and geographic settings than those of the original models (Table III) (83). Thus far, the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first trimester prediction model (namely the triple test), which combines maternal factors, biophysical parameters (MAP and UtA-PI) and serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) has undergone successful internal and external validation (83). The FMF triple test has detection rates of 90 and 75% for the prediction of early and pre-term PE, respectively, with a 10% false-positive rate (FPR) (83).
Crovetto et al (84) explored the independent and combined integration of VEGF, PlGF, sFlt-1 along with maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters and biochemical measurements in first trimester predictive models of early and late PE. For early PE, the model achieved 77.8 and 88.9% detection rates for 5 and 10% FPR, respectively, and for late PE, the detection rates were 51.2 and 69% at 5 and 10% FPR, respectively (area under the curve, 0.888; 95% CI, 0.840-0.936) (84).
In 2015, the same scientific group (85) performed a study aiming to confirm, in a substantially larger sample size, their previous results and to develop the optimal first trimester screening model for PE based on the combination of maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters and biochemical markers, including PAPP-A, PlGF and sFlt1 in a low-risk population. The optimal model for early PE achieved 87.7 and 91.2% detection rates for 5 and 10% FPR, respectively and for late PE, the detection rates were 68.3 and 76.4% at 5 and 10% of FPR, respectively, indicating that the inclusion of angiogenic factors in existing predicting models for PE can substantially improve their detection rate with high accuracy in general low-risk obstetric populations (85). However, the aforementioned models had undergone external validation in a Dutch study including 3,736 women with 87 (2.3%) affected by PE and suboptimal calibration and discrimination for PE was observed (86).
Tsiakkas et al (87) examined the combined screening with maternal factors, medical history and serum sFlt-1 and their results confirmed the superior performance for the detection of early, compared to late, PE and improvement with advancing gestational age at screening. Moreover, they demonstrated that the integration of sFlt-1 measurement at 110-13 weeks did not improve the prediction of PE achieved by maternal factors alone (87).
Diguisto et al (88) examined whether first-trimester Uterine artery Doppler (UAD) combined with angiogenic markers could help to predict PE and other adverse outcomes. They found that the optimal prediction model was the combination of UAD and serum PlGF, while the combination of UAD and sFlt-1 did not significantly improve the prediction of PE or other outcomes compared with serum PlGF alone, confirming the poor performance of sFlt-1 in first-trimester screening of PE (88).
Recently, Verlohren et al (89) published an article following a meeting of international experts with the aim of providing clinicians guidance for the use of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the management of women with PE and improving clinical care, as well as suggestions for further research on their clinical utility in various circumstances.
6. Conclusions and future perspectives
The present review summarized the role of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the prediction and diagnosis of PE. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio represents an additional and advanced diagnostic tool for PE, independent of blood pressure or laboratory markers of HELLP syndrome, to identify patients who develop PE or develop severe PE requiring pre-term birth. Estimated maternal/fetal complications are highly desirable and are urgently required. Furthermore, the economic impact of the routine clinical use of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio has been demonstrated in a number of studies, as the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio is easy to be measured and its use results in shorter hospital stays (90). The use of highly specific tests, such as sFlt1 and PlGF, risk stratification and the management of patients with suspected PE will reduce unnecessary investigations, introductions and even pre-term births and at the same time, will provide better focus on patients who are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. In addition, there is a double benefit: Tailor resources to women at highest risk, while minimizing overestimation and intervention for women at lower risk. It is therefore a useful tool for individual risk stratification and further studies/larger trials are warranted in order to improve its clinical applicability and to provide guidance for its global use in order to obtain a better homogeneous clinical management of women with PE.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
All the authors (AV, PF, EK, SS) contributed to the conception and design of the study. PF and EK searched the literature for inclusion in the study that was then examined and reviewed by AV and SS. PF and EK drafted and wrote the manuscript. AV and SS provided advice and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Abbreviations:
PE |
preeclampsia |
IUGR |
intrauterine growth retardation |
EOPE |
early-onset PE |
LOPE |
late-onset preeclampsia |
HELLP |
hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets |
STB |
secondary syncytiotrophoblast |
HIF-1α |
hypoxia-inducible factor 1α |
ET-1 |
endothelin-1 |
STBM |
syncytiotrophoblast microparticles |
AT1-AA |
angiotensin II 1 receptor autoantibodies |
NO |
nitric oxide |
OS |
oxidative stress |
ER |
endoplasmic reticulum |
VEGF |
vascular endothelial growth factor |
PlGF |
placental growth factor |
sFlt-1 |
soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 |
sEng |
soluble endoglin |
VEGFRs |
vascular endothelial growth factor (angiogenic) receptors |
KDR |
kinase domain region |
EGFR |
epidermal growth factor receptor |
CPEP |
calcium for preeclampsia prevention |
uFP ratio |
urinary sFlt-1-to-PlGF ratio |
CI |
confidence interval |
ROC |
receiver operating characteristics curve |
PPV |
positive predictive value |
NPV |
negative predictive value |
UtA-PI |
mean uterine artery pulsatility index, MAP, mean arterial pressure |
PROGNOSIS |
PRediction of short-term Outcome in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study |
PreOS |
Preeclampsia Open Study |
STEPS |
study of early preeclampsia in Spain |
NT-proBNP |
N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide |
POP |
pregnancy outcome prediction, INSPIRE, interventional study evaluating the short-term prediction of preeclampsia/eclampsia in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia |
FPR |
false-positive rate |
FMF |
Fetal Medicine Foundation |
PAPP-A |
serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A |
UAD |
uterine artery Doppler |
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
References
Troiano NH: Physiologic and hemodynamic changes during pregnancy. AACN Adv Crit Care. 29:273–283. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sierra-Laguado J, Garcia RG and López-Jaramillo P: Flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 93:60–61. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cid M and González M: Potential benefits of physical activity during pregnancy for the reduction of gestational diabetes prevalence and oxidative stress. Early Hum Dev. 94:57–62. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sibai BM and Frangieh A: Maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 7:420–426. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ahmed A and Perkins J: Angiogenesis and intrauterine growth restriction. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 14:981–998. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vrachnis N, Kalampokas E, Sifakis S, Vitoratos N, Kalampokas T, Botsis D and Iliodromiti Z: Placental growth factor (PlGF): A key to optimizing fetal growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 26:995–1002. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sibai B, Dekker G and Kupferminc M: Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 365:785–799. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
No authors listed. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 135:e237–e260. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, Karumanchi SA, McCarthy FP, Saito S, Hall DR, Warren CE, Adoyi G and Ishaku S; International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP): The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension. 72:24–43. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xiong X, Demianczuk NN, Saunders LD, Wang FL and Fraser WD: Impact of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension on birth weight by gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 155:203–209. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Staff AC: The two-stage placental model of preeclampsia: An update. J Reprod Immunol. 134-135:1–10. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Redman CW: Current topic: pre-eclampsia and the placenta. Placenta. 12:301–308. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pankiewicz K, Szczerba E, Fijalkowska A, Szamotulska K, Szewczyk G, Issat T and Maciejewski TM: The association between serum galectin-3 level and its placental production in patients with preeclampsia. J Physiol Pharmacol. 71:845–856. 2020. | |
Redman CWG and Staff AC: Preeclampsia, biomarkers, syncytiotrophoblast stress, and placental capacity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 213(Suppl 4): S9.e1–S9.e4. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maynard SE, Venkatesha S, Thadhani R and Karumanchi SA: Soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and endothelial dysfunction in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Pediatr Res. 57:1R–7R. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koga K, Osuga Y, Yoshino O, Hirota Y, Ruimeng X, Hirata T, Takeda S, Yano T, Tsutsumi O and Taketani Y: Elevated serum soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (sVEGFR-1) levels in women with preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 88:2348–2351. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsatsaris V, Goffin F and Foidart JM: Circulating angiogenic factors and preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 350:2003–2004. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, Schisterman EF, Thadhani R, Sachs BP, Epstein FH, et al: Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 350:672–683. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maynard SE and Karumanchi SA: Angiogenic factors and preeclampsia. Semin Nephrol. 31:33–46. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pratt A, Da Silva Costa F, Borg AJ, Kalionis B, Keogh R and Murthi P: Placenta-derived angiogenic proteins and their contribution to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Angiogenesis. 18:115–123. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Helmo FR, Lopes AMM, Carneiro ACDM, Campos CG, Silva PB, Dos Reis Monteiro MLG, Rocha LP, Dos Reis MA, Etchebehere RM, Machado JR and Corrêa RRM: Angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. Pathol Res Pract. 214:7–14. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ferrara N and Kerbel RS: Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target. Nature. 438:967–974. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kendall RL and Kenneth AT: Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth factor activity by an endogenously encoded soluble receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:10705–10709. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Clark DE, Smith SK, He Y, Day KA, Licence DR, Corps AN, Lammoglia R and Charnock-Jones DS: A vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist is produced by the human placenta and released into the maternal circulation. Biol Reprod. 59:1540–1548. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taylor RN, Grimwood J, Taylor RS, McMaster MT, Fisher SJ and North RA: Longitudinal serum concentrations of placental growth factor: Evidence for abnormal placental angiogenesis in pathologic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 188:177–182. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ferrara N, Gerber HP and LeCouter J: The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 9:669–676. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hirashima C, Ohkuchi A, Arai F, Takahashi K, Suzuki H, Watanabe T, Kario K, Matsubara S and Suzuki M: Establishing reference values for both total soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and free placental growth factor in pregnant women. Hypertens Res. 28:727–732. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Azimi-Nezhad M: Vascular endothelial growth factor from embryonic status to cardiovascular pathology. Rep Biochem Mol Biol. 2:59–69. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vincenti V, Cassano C, Rocchi M and Persico G: Assignment of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene to human chromosome 6p21.3. Circulation. 93:1493–1495. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maglione D, Guerriero V, Viglietto G, Delli-Bovi P and Persico MG: Isolation of a human placenta cDNA coding for a protein related to the vascular permeability factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 88:9267–9271. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Falco S: The discovery of placenta growth factor and its biological activity. Exp Mol Med. 44:1–9. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JE, Chen HH, Winer J, Houck KA and Ferrara N: Placenta growth factor. Potentiation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioactivity, in vitro and in vivo, and high affinity binding to Flt-1 but not to Flk-1/KDR. J Biol Chem. 269:25646–25654. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee ES, Oh MJ, Jung JW, Lim JE, Seol HJ, Lee KJ and Kim HJ: The levels of circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and soluble Flt-1 in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J Korean Med Sci. 22:94–98. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Roberts JM and Rajakumar A: Preeclampsia and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 94:2252–2254. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Palmer KR, Kaitu'u-Lino TJ, Hastie R, Hannan NJ, Ye L, Binder N, Cannon P, Tuohey L, Johns TG, Shub A and Tong S: Placental-specific sFLT-1 e15a protein is increased in preeclampsia, antagonizes vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, and has antiangiogenic activity. Hypertension. 66:1251–1259. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hastie R, Brownfoot FC, Pritchard N, Hannan NJ, Cannon P, Nguyen V, Palmer K, Beard S, Tong S and Kaitu'u-Lino TJ: EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) signaling and the mitochondria regulate sFlt-1 (soluble FMS-Like tyrosine kinase-1) secretion. Hypertension. 73:659–670. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Levine RJ, Lam C, Qian C, Yu KF, Maynard SE, Sachs BP, Sibai BM, Epstein FH, Romero R, Thadhani R, et al: Soluble endoglin and other circulating antiangiogenic factors in preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 355:992–1005. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, Lim KH, Li J, Mondal S, Libermann TA, Morgan JP, Sellke FW, Stillman IE, et al: Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest. 111:649–658. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thadhani R, Mutter WP, Wolf M, Levine RJ, Taylor RN, Sukhatme VP, Ecker J and Karumanchi SA: First trimester placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 and risk for preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 89:770–775. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kim YM, Kim GJ, Kim MR, Espinoza J, Bujold E, Gonçalves L, Gomez R, Edwin S and Mazor M: Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated prior to the clinical diagnosis of pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 17:3–18. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Buhimschi CS, Norwitz ER, Funai E, Richman S, Guller S, Lockwood CJ and Buhimschi IA: Urinary angiogenic factors cluster hypertensive disorders and identify women with severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 192:734–741. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohkuchi A, Hirashima C, Matsubara S, Suzuki H, Takahashi K, Arai F, Watanabe T, Kario K and Suzuki M: Alterations in placental growth factor levels before and after the onset of preeclampsia are more pronounced in women with early onset severe preeclampsia. Hypertens Res. 30:151–159. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stepan H, Unversucht A, Wessel N and Faber R: Predictive value of maternal angiogenic factors in second trimester pregnancies with abnormal uterine perfusion. Hypertension. 49:818–824. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Vivo A, Baviera G, Giordano D, Todarello G, Corrado F and D'anna R: Endoglin, PlGF and sFlt-1 as markers for predicting pre-eclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 87:837–842. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Romero R, Nien JK, Espinoza J, Todem D, Fu W, Chung H, Kusanovic JP, Gotsch F, Erez O, Mazaki-Tovi S, et al: A longitudinal study of angiogenic (placental growth factor) and anti-angiogenic (soluble endoglin and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) factors in normal pregnancy and patients destined to develop preeclampsia and deliver a small for gestational age neonate. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 21:9–23. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Ohkuchi A, Hirashima C, Suzuki H, Takahashi K, Yoshida M, Matsubara S and Suzuki M: Evaluation of a new and automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for plasma sFlt-1 and PlGF levels in women with preeclampsia. Hypertens Res. 33:422–427. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Verlohren S, Galindo A, Schlembach D, Zeisler H, Herraiz I, Moertl MG, Pape J, Dudenhausen JW, Denk B and Stepan H: An automated method for the determination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio in the assessment of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202:161.e1–161.e11. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sunderji S, Gaziano E, Wothe D, Rogers LC, Sibai B, Karumanchi SA and Hodges-Savola C: Automated assays for sVEGF R1 and PlGF as an aid in the diagnosis of preterm preeclampsia: A prospective clinical study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202:40.e1–e77. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Savasan ZA, Kusanovic JP, Ogge G, Soto E, Dong Z, Tarca A, Gaurav B and Hassan SS: Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors are of prognostic value in patients presenting to the obstetrical triage area with the suspicion of preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 24:1187–1207. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rana S, Powe CE, Salahuddin S, Verlohren S, Perschel FH, Levine RJ, Lim KH, Wenger JB, Thadhani R and Karumanchi SA: Angiogenic factors and the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected preeclampsia. Circulation. 125:911–919. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moore AG, Young H, Keller JM, Ojo LR, Yan J, Simas TA and Maynard SE: Angiogenic biomarkers for prediction of maternal and neonatal complications in suspected preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 25:2651–2657. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Verlohren S, Herraiz I, Lapaire O, Schlembach D, Moertl M, Zeisler H, Calda P, Holzgreve W, Galindo A, Engels T, et al: The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in different types of hypertensive pregnancy disorders and its prognostic potential in preeclamptic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 206:58.e1–e8. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Herraiz I, Dröge LA, Gómez-Montes E, Henrich W, Galindo A and Verlohren S: Characterization of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 124:265–273. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, Cortez JM, Pappas A, Tarca AL, Chaemsaithong P, Dong Z, Yeo L and Hassan SS: Plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors have prognostic value in women presenting with suspected preeclampsia to the obstetrical triage area: a prospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 27:132–144. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Rana S, Schnettler WT, Powe C, Wenger J, Salahuddin S, Cerdeira AS, Verlohren S, Perschel FH, Arany Z, Lim KH, et al: Clinical characterization and outcomes of preeclampsia with normal angiogenic profile. Hypertens Pregnancy. 32:189–201. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gómez-Arriaga PI, Herraiz I, López-Jiménez EA, Escribano D, Denk B and Galindo A: Uterine artery Doppler and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio: Prognostic value in early-onset pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 43:525–532. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Garcia-Tizon Larroca S, Tayyar A, Poon LC, Wright D and Nicolaides KH: Competing risks model in screening for preeclampsia by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-33 weeks' gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 36:9–17. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Verlohren S, Herraiz I, Lapaire O, Schlembach D, Zeisler H, Calda P, Sabria J, Markfeld-Erol F, Galindo A, Schoofs K, et al: New gestational phase-specific cutoff values for the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio as a diagnostic test for preeclampsia. Hypertension. 63:346–352. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schoofs K, Grittner U, Engels T, Pape J, Denk B, Henrich W and Verlohren S: The importance of repeated measurements of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinat Med. 42:61–68. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang J, Klebanoff MA and Roberts JM: Prediction of adverse outcomes by common definitions of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 97:261–267. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
No authors listed. ACOG practice bulletin no. 202: Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 133:12019. | |
Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, Forest JC and Giguère Y: Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 116:402–414. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE): PlGF-based testing to help diagnose suspected preterm pre-eclampsia. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg49. Accessed July 27, 2022 | |
Dröge LA, Perschel FH, Stütz N, Gafron A, Frank L, Busjahn A, Henrich W and Verlohren S: Prediction of preeclampsia-related adverse outcomes with the sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1)/PlGF (placental growth factor)-ratio in the clinical routine: A real-world study. Hypertension. 77:461–471. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hughes RCE, Phillips I, Florkowski CM and Gullam J: The predictive value of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in suspected preeclampsia in a New Zealand population: A prospective cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 63:34–41. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hund M, Allegranza D, Schoedl M, Dilba P, Verhagen-Kamerbeek W and Stepan H: Multicenter prospective clinical study to evaluate the prediction of short-term outcome in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia (PROGNOSIS): Study protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 14:3242014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantrain F, Vatish M, Staff AC, Sennström M, Olovsson M, Brennecke SP, Stepan H, Allegranza D, et al: Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. New Engl J Med. 374:13–22. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hund M, Verhagen-Kamerbeek W, Reim M, Messinger D, van der Does R and Stepan H: Influence of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio on clinical decision-making in women with suspected preeclampsia-the PreOS study protocol. Hypertens Pregnancy. 34:102–115. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klein E, Schlembach D, Ramoni A, Langer E, Bahlmann F, Grill S, Schaffenrath H, van der Does R, Messinger D, Verhagen-Kamerbeek WD, et al: Influence of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio on clinical decision-making in women with suspected preeclampsia. PLoS One. 11:e01560132016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Perales A, Delgado JL, de la Calle M, García-Hernández JA, Escudero AI, Campillos JM, Sarabia MD, Laíz B, Duque M, Navarro M, et al: sFlt-1/PlGF for prediction of early-onset pre-eclampsia: STEPS (study of early pre-eclampsia in Spain). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 50:373–382. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Herraiz I, Simón E, Gómez-Arriaga PI, Quezada MS, García-Burguillo A, López-Jiménez EA and Galindo A: Clinical implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to identify preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction: A prospective cohort study. Pregnancy Hypertens. 13:279–285. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sabriá E, Lequerica-Fernández P, Lafuente-Ganuza P, Eguia-Ángeles E, Escudero AI, Martínez-Morillo E, Barceló C and Álvarez FV: Addition of N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide to soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio >38 improves prediction of pre-eclampsia requiring delivery within 1 week: A longitudinal cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 51:758–767. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lafuente-Ganuza P, Lequerica-Fernandez P, Carretero F, Escudero AI, Martinez-Morillo E, Sabria E, Herraiz I, Galindo A, Lopez A, Martinez-Triguero ML and Alvarez FV: A more accurate prediction to rule in and rule out pre-eclampsia using the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and NT-proBNP as biomarkers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 58:399–407. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D and Smith GCS: Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the pregnancy outcome prediction (POP) study: A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 386:2089–2097. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeisler H, Llurba E, Chantraine FJ, Vatish M, Staff AC, Sennström M, Olovsson M, Brennecke SP, Stepan H, Allegranza D, et al: Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio: Ruling out pre-eclampsia for up to 4 weeks and value of retesting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 53:367–375. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Bian X, Biswas A, Huang X, Lee KJ, Li TK, Masuyama H, Ohkuchi A, Park JS, Saito S, Tan KH, et al: Short-term prediction of adverse outcomes using the sFlt-1 (soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1)/PlGF (placental growth factor) ratio in Asian women with suspected preeclampsia. Hypertension. 74:164–172. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cerdeira AS, O'Sullivan J, Ohuma EO, Harrington D, Szafranski P, Black R, Mackillop L, Impey L, Greenwood C, James T, et al: Randomized interventional study on prediction of preeclampsia/eclampsia in women with suspected preeclampsia: INSPIRE. Hypertension. 74:983–990. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cerdeira AS, O'Sullivan J, Ohuma EO, James T, Papageorghiou AT, Knight M and Vatish M: Ruling out preeclampsia in the next 4 weeks using a soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1/placental growth factor ratio ≤38: Secondary analysis of the interventional study on prediction of preeclampsia/eclampsia in women with suspected preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 226:443–445. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Perry H, Binder J, Kalafat E, Jones S, Thilaganathan B and Khalil A: Angiogenic marker prognostic models in pregnant women with hypertension. Hypertension. 75:755–761. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Peguero A, Fernandez-Blanco L, Mazarico E, Benitez L, Gonzalez A, Youssef L, Crispi F, Hernandez S and Figueras F: Added prognostic value of longitudinal changes of angiogenic factors in early-onset severe pre-eclampsia: A prospective cohort study. BJOG. 128:158–165. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dathan-Stumpf A, Czarnowsky V, Hein V, Andraczek T and Stepan H: Real-world data on the clinical use of angiogenic factors in pregnancies with placental dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 226(2S): S1037–S1047.e2. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kifle MM, Dahal P, Vatish M, Cerdeira AS and Ohuma EO: The prognostic utility of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PIGF) biomarkers for predicting preeclampsia: A secondary analysis of data from the INSPIRE trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 22:5202022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaemsaithong P, Sahota DS and Poon LC: First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 226(2S): S1071–S1097.e2. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Peguero A, Dominguez C and Gratacos E: Added value of angiogenic factors for the prediction of early and late preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 35:258–266. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Crovetto F, Figueras F, Triunfo S, Crispi F, Rodriguez-Sureda V, Dominguez C, Llurba E and Gratacós E: First trimester screening for early and late preeclampsia based on maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters, and angiogenic factors. Prenat Diagn. 35:183–191. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lamain-de Ruiter M, Kwee A, Naaktgeboren CA, Louhanepessy RD, De Groot I, Evers IM, Groenendaal F, Hering YR, Huisjes AJM, Kirpestein C, et al: External validation of prognostic models for preeclampsia in a Dutch multicenter prospective cohort. Hypertens Pregnancy. 38:78–88. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsiakkas A, Mendez O, Wright A, Wright D and Nicolaides KH: Maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 at 12, 22, 32 and 36 weeks' gestation in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 47:478–483. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Diguisto C, Piver E, Gouge AL, Eboue F, Vaillant CL, Maréchaud M, Goua V, Giraudeau B and Perrotin F: First trimester uterine artery Doppler, sFlt-1 and PlGF to predict preeclampsia in a high-risk population. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 30:1514–1519. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Verlohren S, Brennecke SP, Galindo A, Karumanchi SA, Mirkovic LB, Schlembach D, Stepan H, Vatish M, Zeisler H and Rana S: Clinical interpretation and implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in the prediction, diagnosis and management of preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 27:42–50. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dathan-Stumpf A, Rieger A, Verlohren S, Wolf C and Stepan H: sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for prediction of preeclampsia in clinical routine: A pragmatic real-world analysis of healthcare resource utilisation. PLoS One. 17:e02634432022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |