Clinical updates of B‑cell maturation antigen‑targeted therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) and relapsed/refractory MM (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 6, 2024 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5468
- Article Number: 27
-
Copyright: © Xing et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Multiple myeloma (MM) represents a hematologic neoplasm characterized by the presence of aberrant clonal plasma cells within the bone marrow environment. According to an annual report from the American Cancer Society for 2023, an approximate total of 35,730 novel cases of MM were predicted to be diagnosed in the US, alongside a count of 12,590 fatalities attributed to this condition (1). Consequently, a profound comprehension of the intricate mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of MM is of significant importance.
Currently, treatment of patients newly diagnosed with MM starts with induction therapy, followed by consolidation therapy and finally maintenance therapy for those who are suitable for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (2-6). The existing therapeutic approach during the induction therapy phase involves the consideration of the impact of lenalidomide on stem cell drug toxicity and the hepatotoxicity associated with high-dose chemotherapy in the elderly demographic. The incorporation of B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibodies into this phase of treatment prompts an inquiry into the potential enhancement of accessibility to autologous stem cell transplantation consolidation within this patient population (2,7,8). In consolidation treatment, stratified treatment is used to evaluate whether the patients are suitable for autologous stem cell transplantation according to their age, scores of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the state of complications. Among them, the combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD) has been selected as the preferred induction regimen if the condition of primary MM allowed, and hematopoietic stem cell collection was performed within 4 cycles to reduce the toxicity of lenalidomide on hematopoietic stem cells and its effect on later implantation (9,10). In addition, there are certain reports addressing the potential to improve complete response (CR) rates and achieve profound remissions through the combination of BCMA-targeted agents with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. It is noteworthy that BCMA-targeted therapeutics are presently predominantly used in patients with MM who have relapsed, are refractory or have relapsed following multiple lines of therapy (11). During the maintenance phase of MM treatment, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend lenalidomide as the preferred maintenance therapy for MM, but certain patients are insensitive or intolerant to it (11,12). In such cases, alternative therapies are essential to maintain therapeutic efficacy (13).
BCMA is mostly expressed on mature B lymphocytes, with its overexpression and activation associated with human MM progression (14). BCMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein of type III, with 184 amino acids and possessing a molecular weight of 20.2 kDa, featuring an extracellular N-terminus with a conserved 6-cysteine motif. This glycoprotein is categorized as a constituent of the necrosis factor family (10,15,16). BCMA interacts with the following tumor necrosis factors (TNF) family members: B-cell activator of the TNF family (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) to induce plasma-cell survival. The progression of human MM is associated with an increase in the expression of BAFF and APRIL in serum instead of the bone marrow microenvironment. Upon binding to APRIL or BAFF, BCMA influences B cells by promoting their proliferation, survival, differentiation and maturation into plasma cells; this modulation is essential for the prolonged survival of plasma cells (17,18). In the context of MM, both BCMA mRNA levels and the abundance of BCMA protein are markedly elevated when compared to normal plasma cells (19). This substantial upregulation of BCMA represents a pivotal factor in the initiation and progression of MM, making it an essential target for treatment (20). Drug resistance in MM arises through various mechanisms, including genetic and cellular changes. Polymorphisms in multidrug resistance genes and the overexpression of P-glycoprotein in MM cells contribute to resistance (21). Alterations in the tumor microenvironment, such as increased cell adhesion and activation of anti-apoptotic cytokine pathways like JAK/STAT and PI3K/AKT, also play a significant role. Clonal evolution, including the hyperexpression of proteasome 26S subunit ubiquitin receptor, non-ATPase 4 due to chromosome 1q21 amplification, and the post-treatment accumulation of CD34+CD138+B7−H1+CD19− plasma cells, further contributes to resistance. Additionally, the dysregulation of various microRNAs impacts MM cell survival, the cell cycle and the microenvironment, leading to resistance to therapies such as bortezomib. Furthermore, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) is upregulated on T cells in patients with MM, while PD-1 ligand 1 expression is elevated on MM cells, further contributing to immune evasion and resistance (5,15,16,20,22).
A survey commissioned by the MM Patients Advocacy Group revealed that 92% of patients with MM were aware of BCMA-targeted therapies. The top three concerns include the assessment of efficacy, consideration of potential side effects and evaluation of eligibility criteria. Patients expressed their willingness to embrace novel drugs and undergo monitoring for potential side effects. This finding underscores the open-mindedness of patients with MM towards adopting innovative treatment modalities (21).
Currently, BCMA has emerged as a promising candidate for diverse therapeutic interventions, encompassing targeted therapies, and has additionally demonstrated potential as a prognostic biomarker. The multifaceted roles played by BCMA underscore its significance in the pathogenesis and clinical management of MM. For instance, Dhakal et al (23) conducted a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial on patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy who were refractory to lenalidomide, targeting BCMA. The trial yielded promising results, with a CR rate of ≥73.1% and an overall response of 84.6%, highlighting the potential efficacy of BCMA-targeted therapies in a specific subset of patients with MM and underscores the significance of ongoing research and clinical trials in this area (14,24).
BCMA
As a biomarker
The National Institute of Health defines a biomarker as an objectively measured indicator of biological processes, whether normal, pathogenic or in response to a therapeutic agent (25,26). Biomarkers, found in body fluids or tissues, can be genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic or clinicopathologic, and serve diagnostic, prognostic or predictive purposes (27,28). Due to the small portion of the MM plasma cells, more reliable biomarkers that can be widely used are needed to guide treatment decisions (29).
Flow cytometry is a crucial tool for diagnosing MM by determining the proportion of monoclonal plasma cells in bone marrow and common markers including CD38, CD138 and CD56 are used to distinguish neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells in clinical practice (30). However, these markers have separate limitations: CD138 degrades with temperature and time, CD38 can be influenced by other diseases or medications and CD56 is a non-specific marker for MM (30-32). BCMA is highly expressed on malignant plasma cells and high expression of BCMA in serum is associated with the progression and the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with MM and mouse models (33,34). Numerous studies have screened the diagnostic utility of BCMA, predicting treatment responses and assessing prognosis. Notably, a reduction in soluble BCMA (sBCMA) has been consistently observed in various clinical trials, correlating with an improved ORR (33). Furthermore, BCMA antigen is overexpressed in abnormal plasma cells and it is stable and not easily degraded by temperature (35,36). In addition, BCMA shows consistent expression in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM, suggesting its potential as a biomarker across disease stages (9).
Monitoring serum sBCMA levels and minimal residual disease (MRD) levels of BCMA expression by flow cytometry also provides valuable insight (37). Lower sBCMA levels indicate effective treatment, while higher levels are associated with the tumor burden (38,39). With a short half-life of 24-26 h, sBCMA quickly reflects treatment effects, making it a sensitive marker for monitoring disease status. This offers an advantage over traditional M-protein monitoring, whose serum half-life typically spans three to four weeks (40,41). In addition, anti-BCMA antibody treatments are less prone to immune escape, making sBCMA a reliable tumor marker (9,42).
As a prognostic indicator
Prognostic assessment tools for MM include ISS staging, R-ISS staging, the 2014 IMWG criteria and Mayo staging, alongside genetic analysis via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or the detection of complex karyotypes via high-resolution chromosome examination (43). In a cohort comprising 36 MM patient samples, a hybridization technique was employed using three distinct probes designed for chromosome 13q (43-45). The outcomes of this analysis indicated that the utilization of FISH studies indicated not only the translocation of chromosome 14q32 but also 17p13 yielded notably meaningful findings during the clinical follow-up of patients with MM. These results confirmed the precise detection of chromosome mutation in patients with MM with FISH (38,46,47). However, these methods can be costly, time-consuming and require specialized expertise, highlighting the need for novel prognostic markers which can be easily accessed.
sBCMA has emerged as a valuable predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with MM (48). High sBCMA levels before treatment are linked to poorer clinical outcomes and elevated levels during early treatment phases suggest an unfavorable prognosis (33,49). Various methodologies employed for the detection of BCMA in serum may contribute to the observed association between sBCMA levels and clinical prognosis (50). sBCMA, shed from MM cells, indicates tumor burden and quickly reflects changes in response to treatment, offering a rapid prognostic tool (20,41).
BCMA-targeted therapies do not interfere with sBCMA detection and BCMA can be used in high-throughput flow cytometry to assess MRD. This method is currently more reliable for disease monitoring than next-generation sequencing, though there is no consensus on the definition of a negative MRD test (51).
As a target
Given the established efficacy of BCMA-targeted therapy, numerous patients now have access to innovative drugs for combatting R/R MM. Certain diagnostic tools and biomarkers have demonstrated drug-targeted value, and the advent of flow cytometry and sequencing technologies facilitates the monitoring of MRD (50). These advances enable the identification of specific high-risk groups and patients with R/R MM. One of the primary objectives in the design of BCMA-targeting drugs is to address these high-risk groups and improve the prognosis of MM and R/R MM and the ultimate goal is to delay disease recurrence and progression, with the intention of extending overall survival (OS). Presently, there exist three predominant strategies for the treatment of R/R MM and MM targeting BCMA including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and emerging therapies.
Monoclonal antibodies
These agents target antigens upregulated in MM cells, engaging immune mechanisms such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) (52). For instance, GSK2857916, a glycosylated IgG1 BCMA antibody drug (53,54), which enhances BCMA-targeted therapy efficacy by improving ADCC through stronger binding to the FC gamma receptor (FcgR) IIIa/CD16a receptor, has shown efficacy in phase 2 trials with an ORR of 33%. Its cytotoxic payload was activated upon targeted delivery and was demonstrated to be more potent compared to non-targeted drugs; its hydrolysis-resistant linker ensures stability and efficient transport (16,55).
Furthermore, GSK2857916 induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MM cells, triggers ADCC and ADCP through interactions with natural killer (NK) cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and macrophages, competes with BAFF and APRIL to reduce NF-κB activation and diminishes NF-κB pathway support for MM-cell proliferation and drug resistance (52,53,56,57) (Fig. 1A).
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)
ADCs consist of monoclonal antibodies that can specifically target antigens on tumor cells. Once ADCs bind to the surface antigens expressed on tumor cells, toxic payloads are released from ADCs, resulting in the microtubule inhibition or DNA damage in the tumor cells. AMG224 and MEDI2228 are examples of ADCs targeting BCMA. AMG224 achieved an ORR of 23% in phase 1 trials of patients with MM and R/R MM with lower sBCMA (36,38,58).
MEDI2228 is a fully human ADC targeting BCMA, linked to a DNA cross-linking pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer through a protease-cleavable linker, and it synergizes with DNA damage response inhibitors to induce apoptotic cell death via DNA cross-link formation (59). Clinical studies have shown its superior efficacy compared to monomethyl myricin F analogs, particularly in the presence of elevated sBCMA levels, with ongoing Phase 1 trials assessing its use as monotherapy in R/R MM conditions with the mechanism of interferon (IFN)-stimulated gene enrichment following the DNA damage-ATM/ATR-checkpoint kinase 1/2 pathway (60,61).
MEDI2228 also activates the IFN-regulated innate immune response through the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes-TANK binding kinase 1-interferon regulatory factors (IRF)3 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 1-IRF1 pathways in MM cells, demonstrating efficacy against both proliferating and quiescent MM cells in vitro, though it is less effective against BCMA-negative cells. In murine models, a single low-dose intravenous administration of HDP-101, an analogous ADC, induced tumor regression and achieved sustained complete remission (61) (Fig. 1B).
Emerging therapies
There are also emerging therapies targeting BCMA to enhance clinical outcomes. SEA-BCMA is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting BCMA, showing promising early clinical results with an ORR of 30%. It inhibits BCMA-mediated pro-survival signaling, enhances ADCC and phagocytosis and has demonstrated potential for durable anti-tumor activity, particularly in patients with advanced, heavily pretreated MM (59,62). Preliminary data from the SGN-BCMA-001 (NCT03582033) trial support its favorable safety profile and suggest potential for synergistic combinations. Despite the advantages over CAR-T therapy, such as accessibility and applicability to elderly patients, BCMA-targeted therapies may pose toxic side effects and economic burdens with prolonged use (62,63) (Fig. 1C). However, it is essential to acknowledge that these therapies may entail potential toxic side effects and their efficacy when used as single agents tends to be moderately effective. In addition, the prolonged use of these drugs may impose a considerable economic burden.
BCMA-targeting strategies to modulate the immune microenvironment (IME)
Having gained insight into the biological characteristics of BCMA and its involvement in the pathways driving tumor progression, this next chapter will delve into ongoing clinical trials focusing on drugs that influence the IME to extend survival through administration of the optimal doses with mitigated adverse effects and maximal survival (8).
Bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs)
BiTEs represent a specialized form of targeted immunotherapy that operates independently of major histocompatibility complex restriction but the requirement for intact antigen-presenting cell function (64). These BiTEs facilitate T cell-mediated cytotoxicity by directly binding T cells to surface antigens present on tumor cells. Upon interaction with both the target tumor cell and T-cell lymphocyte, BiTEs initiate the activation of the T-cell receptor and subsequent downstream signaling events (65). BiTEs are designed with one or more high-affinity domains capable of binding the target protein on the tumor cell and a single lower-affinity domain that binds a protein on immune cells, particularly CD3 on T cells (64,65) (Fig. 2). Certain BiTEs also target other T-cell receptors, such as CD16, NKG2D and, notably, G-protein coupled receptor C family 5D (GPRC5D), which is a non-BCMA-directed T-cell engager. GPRC5D is highly expressed on the surface of plasma cells (66-68).
This section reviews the latest clinical trial results of BiTEs targeting BCMA in the treatment of MM, highlighting their potential to improve outcomes for patients with R/RMM, along with their advantages and disadvantages (Table I) (69).
Teclistamab
Teclistamab, a BCMA-CD3 bispecific antibody, is effective in treating R/R MM and can be administered intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (S.C.). In the NCT03145181 trial, teclistamab achieved an ORR of 65% in 165 patients, with responses showing durability and an increasing depth over time (70). In addition, in the phase 3 trial sponsored by Janssen Research Development, conducted in patients with a median age of 64 years who had received more than three prior therapies, an ORR of 64% was observed, with 30% achieving a CR or partial response (PR) (63). The reduction in sBCMA levels correlated with treatment response, indicating its potential as a biomarker.
A reduction of 82% in BCMA was observed in 27 patients who had achieved a stringent CR (sCR), while an 87% reduction was noted in the 8 patients exhibiting a CR. Furthermore, a reduction of 90% was identified in 34 patients demonstrating a very good PR (VGPR) (63,70). The ongoing phase 3 NCT05083169 trial, launched by Janssen Research, is evaluating the efficacy and safety of teclistamab in combination with daratumumab, compared to other treatment options in patients with R/R MM. This research provides valuable insights into the optimal treatment for this patient population. The results demonstrate substantial clinical activity of teclistamab in heavily pretreated R/R MM, favorably comparing to existing therapies, including CAR-T. While side effects such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neutropenia were observed, CRS events were generally mild, with few grade 3 and no grade 4 occurrences. The lower-grade CRS profile with teclistamab supports its potential for outpatient administration. Although toxic effects were common, they were mainly low-grade and reversible, indicating a significant clinical benefit for a broader patient population (71).
REGN5428
REGN5428, a bispecific antibody targeting BCMA and CD3, was evaluated in a Phase 1 clinical trial (NCT03761108) using a 4+3 dose-escalation design, with IV weekly administration followed by biweekly maintenance. At the highest dose level, the trial achieved an ORR of 60% in 252 patients with a median age of 66 years. Among the participants, 81.3% achieved a VGPR, 31.3% reached a CR and 43.8% maintained remission for over four months (72).
Results from Phase 2 studies released this year focused on dose optimization between 50 and 200 mg. The results revealed that patients treated with 200 mg reached a higher efficacy than those receiving 50 mg, with an ORR of 64 and 50%, respectively. Of note, the 200-mg dose also correlated with fewer AEs, with 95% of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs) vs. 100% in the 50-mg group. Common treatment-emergent AEs included CRS in 37% of the 200-mg group (1% Grade 3) and 53% of the 50-mg group (2% Grade 3). Fatigue occurred in 32% of the 200-mg group and 33% of the 50-mg group, with no severe cases. Anemia was reported in 28% of the 200-mg group (24% severe) and 40% of the 50-mg group (36% severe) (72-74). This clinical trial has recently concluded enrollment and is currently in the follow-up phase.
Recently, an additional open-label, multi-cohort clinical trial (NCT05137054) was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of REGN5458 in conjunction with anti-CD38 antibody, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and 1 proteasome inhibitor (PI) in patients with R/R MM. Results indicate that when combining REGN5428 with IMiDs, PIs and anti-CD38 agents, the higher concentration of 200 mg may be a more effective option for treating R/R MM (74).
Elranatamab
Elranatamab, also known as PF-06863135, is a humanized IgG2-type bispecific antibody that targets BCMA and CD3. It can be administered weekly either IV or S.C. Administration leads to slow absorption, with a half-life of 3 to 7 days (75-77). In the phase I NCT03269136 trial, Elranatamab, a monoclonal antibody for treating R/R MM, was administered at varying concentrations. Among those receiving S.C. monotherapy, 55 patients were treated at efficacious dose levels (≥215 μg/kg), while 10 patients treated with sub-efficacious dose levels (80 or 130 μg/kg) did not achieve an IMWG-confirmed PR or better. With a median follow-up of 12 months, the ORR was 63.6, and 38.2% of patients achieved a CR or better, with no grade ≥3 AEs observed (76,77). These results highlight how immunotherapeutic approaches have expanded treatment options for patients with R/R MM with a higher dose, underscoring the importance of therapy to enhance efficacy while minimizing toxicity for each patient. In the Phase II clinical trial (NCT04649359), 123 patients who had previously undergone non-BCMA-targeted therapies were enrolled. Participants received S.C. elranatamab at a dose of 76 mg once weekly in 28-day cycles, following two step-up priming doses of 12 and 32 mg administered on day 1 and 4 of cycle 1, respectively. A CR or better was observed in 35.0% of the patients, while a VGPR or better was achieved in 56.1% of the cohort. The easy assessment of elranatamab posits it as a viable alternative option to CAR-T-cell therapy. Further clinical trials should be performed to observe the AEs and efficacy of elranatamab given at a biweekly dose, aiming for it to maintain its high efficacy while minimizing AEs (77,78).
ABBV-383
ABBV-383, a BCMA x CD3 bispecific T-cell-redirecting antibody, is administered IV once every three weeks in patients with R/RMM, showing low AEs. In the NCT03933735 Phase I trial, which utilized a 3+3 design with backfilling for dose escalation, the treatment demonstrated promising outcomes (79). The trial showed an impressive 68% ORR in patients receiving doses of 40 mg or higher. As a monotherapy, ABBV-383 demonstrated significant efficacy at both 40- and 60-mg doses, with a median PFS of 13.7 and 11.2 months, respectively. The 12-month duration of response (DOR) was 70% at 40 mg and 66% at 60 mg, with the median DOR not yet reached in patients achieving a CR or better (80,81). However, the ORR at 60 mg was slightly lower at 59%. Hematologic treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were mainly neutropenia (37%) and anemia (29%), while non-hematologic TEAEs included CRS (57%) and fatigue (30%) (82,83). ABBV-383 administration at doses of 20, 40 and 60 mg can led to a rapid but transient induction of key proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ and TNF-α) and a gradual decrease in sBCMA levels, correlating with the therapeutic response. In addition, ABBV-383 promoted T-cell activation and proliferation, as indicated by increased expression of CD69 and Ki67 markers on peripheral CD4 and CD8 T cells in evaluable patients. These findings highlight ABBV-383's significant potential to prolong OS in patients with R/R MM even with low doses (<60 mg) (81).
Furthermore, it is worth noting that a dose of 40 or 60 mg of ABBV-383 every three weeks has been selected for further exploration as the optimal regimen. The low-dosing frequency and off-the-shelf availability make ABBV-383 a convenient option for patients with R/R MM compared to CAR-T therapy. In addition, its high efficacy is comparable to that of ADC belantamab mafodotin and CAR-T-cell therapies, which is 32 and 61.5-97%, respectively (82).
AMG 701
AMG 701 represents a bispecific single-chain variable fragment (scFv) antibody that incorporates a hexahistidine tag for identification and purification. Its mode of administration involves IV infusions administered weekly, organized within 4-week cycles (84). The Phase I clinical trial aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and anti-myeloma activity of AMG701, as well as to estimate a biologically active dose. The results indicate that the response to AMG701 is dose-dependent. At doses ranging from 3 to 12 mg, the response rate was 36% (16 out of 45 patients), while with an earlier dose escalation to 9 mg, the response rate increased significantly to 83%, including 3 PRs and 2 VGPRs. While the underlying mechanisms require further exploration, studies in a mouse model showed that AMG701 increases survival, potentially through the induction of PD-1 expression on T cells. Furthermore, combining AMG701 with a PD-1-blocking antibody enhanced its efficacy, alongside increased concentrations of cytokines, such as IFN-γ and IL-2. These findings suggest a promising potential for combining anti-PD-1 therapy with AMG701(83,84).
CC-93269
CC-93269 is an asymmetric 2-arm humanized IgG T-cell engager that binds bivalently to BCMA and monovalently to CD3ε in a 2+1 format. It can induce interaction between T cells and BCMA-expressing myeloma cells and induces T-cell receptor/CD3 cross-linking leading to T-cell activation, and release of proinflammatory cytokines and cytolytic enzymes, resulting in MM-cell death (NCT03486067) (16,85).
The initial report released in 2019, involving 19 patients with a median age of 64 years who were resistant to their last line of treatment, aimed to assess the safety and anti-tumor response of CC-93269 at doses ranging from 0.15 to 10 mg. Among the 12 patients treated with ≥6 mg in Cycle 1, 10 achieved a PR or better, yielding an ORR of 83.3%. This included 7 patients (58.3%) who achieved a VGPR or better and 4 patients (33.3%) who attained an sCR; 9 patients (75.0%) also achieved MRD negativity (86).
A subsequent clinical trial report from 2022 for measuring the efficacy of CC-93269, which included 70 patients, indicated that 39% (27/70) achieved an objective response, with a median PFS of 13.3 weeks. All CRS events were limited to grade 1 (45%) or grade 2 (9%). Notably, none of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs and no treatment-related deaths occurred. At the 30-mg target dose, observed trough concentrations by Cycle 2 Day 1, the predicted levels required for efficacy were exceeded (85-87). The number of patients in the clinical trial for CC-93269 was limited and additional participants are needed to draw broader conclusions.
CAR-T BCMA drugs have shown promising efficacy in the treatment of R/R MM
Over 20 CAR-T products targeting BCMA are currently in clinical trials, with variations in design, BCMA epitopes, co-stimulation thresholds and viral vectors leading to differences in efficacy and challenges in production time and cost (88,89).
CAR-T therapy is the most effective BCMA-targeted treatment for R/R MM, generally achieving a 50-93% ORR in patients who have relapsed after three or more lines of therapy; the structure and clinical efficacy of major second-generation CAR-T-cell therapies are summarized in Table II (16,90,91). The therapy activates T-cells' tumor-killing abilities through specific antigen recognition and co-stimulatory signals, but the associated toxicities, including CRS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), hematologic toxicity, infection and tumor lysis syndrome, limit its application (Fig. 2). CRS, triggered by cytokine release, affects >60% of patients, with the severity influenced by disease type, CAR-T dose and co-stimulatory molecules, while ICANS presents with neurological symptoms and requires similar treatment (91-93). Hematological toxicity, mainly due to lymphocyte depletion and off-target effects, increases infection and bleeding risks, which can be managed with transfusions and growth factors (94).
Table IIOverview of ongoing/completed next-generation CAR-T cell therapy targeting B-cell maturation antigen. |
In this review, recent advances in clinical trials related to CAR-T therapies targeting BCMA were summarized and the future directions for these drugs were outlined (Table III).
bb2121
b2121, also known as Idecabtagene vicleucel, a CAR T-cell therapy targeting BCMA, shows significant potential in the treatment of MM. It is the first CAR-T-cell therapy approved for treating R/R MM after four or more prior therapies. bb2121 shows reduced antigen-independent signaling and strong in vitro cytotoxicity against myeloma cells with varying BCMA expression. Previously, in an in vivo NOD scid gamma (NSG) mouse model of human MM, bb2121 achieved rapid and sustained tumor elimination (13,35).
In the Phase I clinical trial (NCT02658929), which included 33 patients with MM who received CAR-T-cell infusions ranging from 10-800×106 in the dose-escalation phase and 150 or 450×106 in the expansion phase, an impressive ORR of 85% was achieved, with 9 patients attaining CR without any relapse. Patients who received >150×106 demonstrated a better response rate (35).
Additionally, the clearance of bone marrow plasma cells occurs rapidly, typically within one month, and the incidence of AEs is low, primarily restricted to grade 1 or 2. Importantly, the efficacy of the treatment appears to be independent of BCMA expression, as both high and low expression levels result in similarly high response rates, indicating its potential applicability for a broad range of MMs. However, there are limitations to consider. The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings and future studies should involve a larger patient cohort to better evaluate the treatment's efficacy (35).
In the subsequent Phase II clinical trial conducted in Japanese patients with R/R MM, an impressive ORR of 89% was achieved with a median follow-up of 12.9 months. The treatment was also associated with low AEs: Predominantly grade 1 or 2. Notably, the regimen involving 450×106 CAR-positive T cells offered the potential for a treatment-free period in this challenging patient population. However, with only 9 patients included to date, further studies with a larger cohort are needed to validate these efficacy findings (95).
CT103A
CT103A constitutes a fully human CAR-T-cell product designed to target BCMA. Clinical investigations of CT103A include a phase 1, single-arm, open-label trial conducted at Tongji Hospital in China (NCT05066646). The study enrolled 18 patients with R/R MM, all of whom had received a minimum of three prior lines, and the follow-up was 394 days. Patients with MM resistant to CAR-T-cell therapy still benefited from CT103A, achieving an ORR of 98% with low AEs including no observed immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. After 1 year, the PFS rate was 58.3% for all cohorts and 79.1% for the patients without extramedullary myeloma. Furthermore, even at the lower dosage levels (1 and 3×106 CAR-T cells/kg), CT103A demonstrated continued activity and effectiveness with minimal side effects (95,96).
Regarding safety outcomes, the predominant late AEs observed 8 weeks post-CAR-T-cell infusion were hematologic toxicities, notably leukopenia and neutropenia. In addition, increasing the number of patients in the study would strengthen the remarkably high-efficacy results (97).
GC012F
GC012F is a dual-targeting CAR-T-cell therapy that targets both BCMA and CD19. It was developed using the innovative FasTCAR-T platform within 22-36 h (98).
The overall response rates were 93.1% (27/29) and most AEs were grade 2 or lower (79.3%), with only 6.9% of patients experiencing grade 3 CRS. GC012F persisted for a median of 410 days (range, 51-1,183 days) and notably remained detectable in 79.3% of patients at 6 months and in 55.2% at 12 months post-infusion. sBCMA plasma levels began to decline by day 4 in 80% of patients, decreased sharply by day 10 in all patients and reached minimal levels from 30 to 60 days post-infusion in all patients (NCT04236011; NCT04182581) (99).
These robust response rates and extended durations of response underscore the promising therapeutic efficacy of the studied cohort but more R/R MM patients should be included for future exploration (98).
MCARH171
MCARH171, a type of next-generation anti-BCMA CAR-T cell, was investigated in patients with R/R MM (100). A total of 11 patients with R/R MM were treated, with a median of six prior therapy lines, achieving a 64% ORR and a median response duration of 106 days in the NCT03070327 clinical trial. Peak expansion and persistence of MCARH171, along with durable clinical responses, were dose-dependent. Patients treated with ≤150×106 CAR-T cells had lower peak expansion in their peripheral blood compared to those receiving ≥450×106 CAR-T cells, showing promising efficacy at higher doses. Peak expansion was associated with response durability, independent of the dose level (91,100). The clinical trial of this drug is constrained by a short follow-up duration and a limited number of participants. However, while the drug shows significant efficacy in treating R/R MM, its performance is not comparable to that of other CAR-T therapies (100).
Conclusion and future perspective
The efficacy of BCMA as a therapeutic target in MM or R/R MM has been demonstrated for common ADC drugs, bispecific antibody T-cell activators and CAR-T-cell therapy. Overall, CAR-T cell therapy and BiTEs activators were more efficacious than ADC drugs alone, reflecting the superiority of antitumor immunotherapy over traditional single-target ADC drugs. In addition, non-BCMA-targeted CAR-T-cell therapies have shown promising results, further contributing to options against the disease. CAR-T cells can specifically target MM cells, either through a single target or dual targets (e.g., BCMA and CD19), and a single dose has been shown to provide sustained efficacy for >12 months with lower AEs. Among the therapies, CAR-T-cell therapy demonstrates the highest therapeutic efficacy on average. However, it is also the most expensive compared to other treatments, including ADCs and BiTEs. In addition, the low administration frequency of certain BiTEs, such as ABBV-383, which is given every three weeks, offers an economic advantage by potentially reducing the financial burden on patients (81). Although CAR-T and BCMA-targeted T-cell activators are not recommended as a first- and second-line therapy, early remission needs to be achieved in MM treatment to improve PFS and OS. From an individual perspective, tumor cells have the ability to exist in the body for a long period of time and even the current MRD test can not say for sure that there are no tumor cells in a patient with CR. Further expansion of CAR-T therapy and other immunotherapies can be used as a supplement and assistance to the immune system to fight tumors. The current means should be improved to achieve a longer PFS time for patients, ulimately improving the quality of life. Furthermore, there is still a need to explore the impact on the tumor microenvironment, the process of the emergence of antigen escape and how tumor cells repair damaged DNA when treating with BCMA-targeted CAR-T or bispecific antibody T-cell activators.
Recent studies have shed light on immune-related factors influencing the efficacy of CAR-T cell therapies, particularly in R/R MM. One study on R/R MM demonstrated that patients with higher numbers of activated/functional T cells and fewer CD163+ macrophages prior to treatment were more likely to experience a durable response to CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy (101). Similarly, resistance to BCMA-targeted CAR-T-cell and BCMA-CD3 BiTE therapies in patients with MM has been linked to a distinct immunological profile. Single-cell sequencing of patient samples revealed an increased proportion of terminally exhausted T cells and a low CD4 ratio, and diminished populations of stem cell memory T cells and central memory T cells are associated with CAR-T therapy resistance (102). In addition, upregulation of T cell immunoreceptor with Lg and ITIM domains + NK cells and an increase in interferon-responsive dendritic cells were identified as contributing factors to therapy resistance (103,104). These immune changes are thought to impair the anti-tumor efficacy of CAR-T-cell therapies in MM by promoting T-cell exhaustion and diminishing the overall immune response (105).
In summary, general therapies targeting BCMA, such as CAR-T cells, BiTEs and ADCs, have demonstrated significant efficacy for MM and R/R MM treatment. While CAR-T therapy displays significant therapeutic potential and durability, high cost and accessibility remain major challenges, alongside the complexity of managing resistance mechanisms. Future research should focus on optimizing these therapies to improve patient access, reduce costs and develop strategies to counteract tumor immune evasion, including understanding the tumor microenvironment and resistance pathways. Expanding on these areas may enhance treatment options, potentially extending PFS and OS for patients with MM and R/R MM.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Authors' contributions
RX, MW, LW and HZ contributed to the conception of the study. RX, MW, LW, MP, YW and HZ contributed to the drafting of the manuscript; RX, MW, MP, LW and HZ critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Data authentication is not applicable. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and take responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The publication and research funding is supported by grant of Jinhua Science and Technology Bureau (grant no. 2022-4-258 to RX), Hengyang City Science and Technology Plan Projects in Hunan Province, China (grant no. 202330046276 to HZ) and the Hunan Provincial Department of Education Scientific Research Project Fund, Hunan Province, China (grant no. 22C0209 to HZ).
References
Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 74:12–49. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Seckinger A, Delgado JA, Moser S, Moreno L, Neuber B, Grab A, Lipp S, Merino J, Prosper F, Emde M, et al: Target expression, generation, preclinical activity, and pharmacokinetics of the BCMA-T cell bispecific antibody em801 for multiple myeloma treatment. Cancer Cell. 31:396–410. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bazarbachi AH, Al Hamed R, Malard F, Bazarbachi A, Harousseau JL and Mohty M: Induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An update. Blood Cancer J. 12:472022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang L, Luo R, Onyshchenko K, Rao X, Wang M, Menz B, Gaedicke S, Grosu AL, Firat E and Niedermann G: Adding liposomal doxorubicin enhances the abscopal effect induced by radiation/αPD1 therapy depending on tumor cell mitochondrial DNA and cGAS/STING. J Immunother Cancer. 11:e0062352023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rahmy S, Cheng X, Wang M, Feng H, Qiu W, Zhao R and Lu X: Organ-specific regulation of CHD1 by acute PTEN and p53 loss in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 525:614–619. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang M, Rao X, Gaedicke S, Wang L, Menz B, Multhoff G and Niedermann G: Adding a PPARα agonist enhances t cell-mediated effects of RT in combination with anti-PD-1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 120(Suppl 1): e409–e410. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ali SA, Shi V, Maric I, Wang M, Stroncek DF, Rose JJ, Brudno JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, Feldman SA, Hansen BG, et al: T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of multiple myeloma. Blood. 128:1688–1700. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu M, Wang L, Su D, Yuan Q, Xiao C, Guo L, Wang M, Kang C, Zhang J and Zhou T: Evaluation of mycotoxins, mycobiota and toxigenic fungi in the traditional medicine Radix Dipsaci. Front Microbiol. 15:14546832024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanchez E, Li M, Kitto A, Li J, Wang CS, Kirk DT, Yellin O, Nichols CM, Dreyer MP, Ahles CP, et al: Serum B-cell maturation antigen is elevated in multiple myeloma and correlates with disease status and survival. Br J Haematol. 158:727–738. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
X R, W M, W G, Z L, W X, C W and W C: Chemotherapy-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with multiple myeloma, a case report and literature review. Front Oncol. 13:12274482023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Salem DA, Maric I, Yuan CM, Liewehr DJ, Venzon DJ, Kochenderfer J and Stetler-Stevenson M: Quantification of B-cell maturation antigen, a target for novel chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in Myeloma. Leuk Res. 71:106–111. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fabi A, Bhargava R, Fatigoni S, Guglielmo M, Horneber M, Roila F, Weis J, Jordan K and Ripamonti CI; ESMO Guidelines Committee: Electronic address clinicalguidelines@esmo.org: Cancer-related fatigue: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Oncol. 31:713–723. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedman KM, Garrett TE, Evans JW, Horton HM, Latimer HJ, Seidel SL, Horvath CJ and Morgan RA: Effective targeting of multiple B-cell maturation antigen-expressing hematological malignances by anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Hum Gene Ther. 29:585–601. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kleber M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I and Terpos E: BCMA in multiple myeloma-A promising key to therapy. J Clin Med. 10:40882021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abramson HN: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) as a target for new drug development in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Int J Mol Sci. 21:51922020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu B, Jiang T and Liu D: BCMA-targeted immunotherapy for multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 13:1252020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tai YT, Acharya C, An G, Moschetta M, Zhong MY, Feng X, Cea M, Cagnetta A, Wen K, van Eenennaam H, et al: APRIL and BCMA promote human multiple myeloma growth and immunosuppression in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 127:3225–3236. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Coquery CM and Erickson LD: Regulatory roles of the tumor necrosis factor receptor BCMA. Crit Rev Immunol. 32:287–305. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Novak AJ, Darce JR, Arendt BK, Harder B, Henderson K, Kindsvogel W, Gross JA, Greipp PR and Jelinek DF: Expression of BCMA, TACI, and BAFF-R in multiple myeloma: A mechanism for growth and survival. Blood. 103:689–694. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shah N, Chari A, Scott E, Mezzi K and Usmani SZ: B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: Rationale for targeting and current therapeutic approaches. Leukemia. 34:985–1005. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oaknin A, Fariñas-Madrid L, García-Duran C, Martin LP, O'Malley DM, Schilder RJ, Uyar D, Moroney JW, Diaz JP, Spira AI, et al: Luveltamab tazevibulin (STRO-002), an anti-folate receptor alpha (FolRα) antibody drug conjugate (ADC), safety and efficacy in a broad distribution of FolRα expression in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC): Update of STRO-002-GM1 phase 1 dose expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol. 41(Suppl 16): S55082023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rao X, Onyshchenko K, Wang L, Wang M and Niedermann G: Comparison of two triple therapy regimens for enhancing the abscopal effect in mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 117:e2562023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dhakal B, Yong K, Harrison SJ, Mateos MV, Moreau P, van de Donk NWCJ, Sidana S, Popat R, Lendvai N, Lonardi C, et al: First phase 3 results from CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-cel versus standard of care (PVd or DPd) in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 41:LBA1062023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dhakal B, Szabo A, Chhabra S, Hamadani M, D'Souza A, Usmani SZ, Sieracki R, Gyawali B, Jackson JL, Asimakopoulos F and Hari PN: Autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agent induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 4:343–350. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gopalakrishnan S, D'Souza A, Scott E, Fraser R, Davila O, Shah N, Gale RP, Kamble R, Diaz MA, Lazarus HM, et al: Revised international staging system is predictive and prognostic for early relapse (<24 months) after autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 25:683–688. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin J, Zhang G, Lou B, Sun Y, Jia X, Wang M, Zhou J and Xia Z: Identification of copper metabolism-related markers in Parkinson's disease. Ann Med. 56:24250642024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Strimbu K and Tavel JA: What are biomarkers? Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 5:463–466. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Califf RM: Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 243:213–221. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oliva S, Gambella M, Gilestro M, Muccio VE, Gay F, Drandi D, Ferrero S, Passera R, Pautasso C, Bernardini A, et al: Minimal residual disease after transplantation or lenalidomide-based consolidation in myeloma patients: A prospective analysis. Oncotarget. 8:5924–5935. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Jeong TD, Park CJ, Shim H, Jang S, Chi HS, Yoon DH, Kim DY, Lee JH, Lee JH, Suh C and Lee KH: Simplified flow cytometric immunophenotyping panel for multiple myeloma, CD56/CD19/CD138(CD38)/CD45, to differentiate neoplastic myeloma cells from reactive plasma cells. Korean J Hematol. 47:260–266. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bayer-Garner IB, Sanderson RD, Dhodapkar MV, Owens RB and Wilson CS: Syndecan-1 (CD138) immunoreactivity in bone marrow biopsies of multiple myeloma: Shed syndecan-1 accumulates in fibrotic regions. Mod Pathol. 14:1052–1058. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Van De Donk NWCJ, Richardson PG and Malavasi F: CD38 antibodies in multiple myeloma: Back to the future. Blood. 131:13–29. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sanchez E, Gillespie A, Tang G, Ferros M, Harutyunyan NM, Vardanyan S, Gottlieb J, Li M, Wang CS, Chen H and Berenson JR: Soluble B-cell maturation antigen mediates tumor-induced immune deficiency in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 22:3383–3397. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Flores-Montero J, de Tute R, Paiva B, Perez JJ, Böttcher S, Wind H, Sanoja L, Puig N, Lecrevisse Q, Vidriales MB, et al: Immunophenotype of normal vs myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 90:61–72. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, Siegel D, Jagannath S, Madduri D, Liedtke M, Rosenblatt J, Maus MV, Turka A, et al: Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 380:1726–1737. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen H, Li M, Xu N, Ng N, Sanchez E, Soof CM, Patil S, Udd K, Bujarski S, Cao J, et al: Serum B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) reduces binding of anti-BCMA antibody to multiple myeloma cells. Leuk Res. 81:62–66. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Lancaster E, Vogl DT, Weiss BM, Dengel K, Nelson A, et al: B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 129:2210–2221. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee L, Bounds D, Paterson J, Herledan G, Sully K, Seestaller-Wehr LM, Fieles WE, Tunstead J, McCahon L, Germaschewski FM, et al: Evaluation of B cell maturation antigen as a target for antibody drug conjugate mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 174:911–922. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Visram A, Soof C, Rajkumar SV, Kumar SK, Bujarski S, Spektor TM, Kyle RA, Berenson JR and Dispenzieri A: Serum BCMA levels predict outcomes in MGUS and smoldering myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J. 11:1202021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bujarski S, Soof C, Li M, Wang CS, Sanchez E, Emamy-Sadr M, Swift R, Rahbari K, Patil S, Spektor TM, et al: Baseline and early changes in serum B-cell maturation antigen levels predict progression free survival and response status for multiple myeloma patients in a phase 1 trial evaluating ruxolitinib, lenalidomide and methylprednisolone. Blood. 132(Suppl 1): 18942018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ghermezi M, Li M, Vardanyan S, Harutyunyan NM, Gottlieb J, Berenson A, Spektor TM, Andreu-Vieyra C, Petraki S, Sanchez E, et al: Serum B-cell maturation antigen: A novel biomarker to predict outcomes for multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica. 102:785–795. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Mailankody S, Htut M, Lee KP, Bensinger W, Devries T, Piasecki J, Ziyad S, Blake M, Byon J and Jakubowiak A: JCARH125, anti-BCMA CAR T-cell Therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Initial proof of concept results from a phase 1/2 multicenter study (EVOLVE). Blood. 132(Suppl 1): 9572018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Richardson P, Caltagirone S, Lahuerta JJ, Facon T, et al: Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: A report from international myeloma working group. J Clin Oncol. 33:2863–2869. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, Michalis E, Tsatalas C, Michael M, Pouli A, Kartasis Z, Delimpasi S, Gika D, Zomas A, et al: The international scoring system (ISS) for multiple myeloma remains a robust prognostic tool independently of patients' renal function. Ann Oncol. 23:722–729. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Landgren O and Rajkumar SV: New developments in diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of response in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 22:5428–5433. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yuregir OO, Sahin FI, Yilmaz Z, Kizilkilic E, Karakus S and Ozdogu H: Fluorescent in situ hybridization studies in multiple myeloma. Hematology. 14:90–94. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huber D, Voith Von Voithenberg L and Kaigala GV: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): History, limitations and what to expect from micro-scale FISH? Micro Nano Eng. 1:15–24. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Laurent SA, Hoffmann FS, Kuhn PH, Cheng Q, Chu Y, Schmidt-Supprian M, Hauck SM, Schuh E, Krumbholz M, Rübsamen H, et al: γ-Secretase directly sheds the survival receptor BCMA from plasma cells. Nat Commun. 6:73332015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Coquery CM, Loo WM, Wade NS, Bederman AG, Tung KS, Lewis JE, Hess H and Erickson LD: BAFF regulates follicular helper t cells and affects their accumulation and interferon-γ production in autoimmunity. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67:773–784. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Oliva S, Bruinink DHO, Rihova L, D'Agostino M, Pantani L, Capra A, van der Holt B, Troia R, Petrucci MT, Villanova T, et al: Minimal residual disease assessment by multiparameter flow cytometry in transplant-eligible myeloma in the EMN02/HOVON 95 MM trial. Blood Cancer J. 11:1062021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanchez E, Tanenbaum EJ, Patil S, Li M, Soof CM, Vidisheva A, Waterman GN, Hekmati T, Tang G, Wang CS, et al: The clinical significance of B-cell maturation antigen as a therapeutic target and biomarker. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 18:319–329. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Montes De Oca R, Alavi AS, Vitali N, Bhattacharya S, Blackwell C, Patel K, Seestaller-Wehr L, Kaczynski H, Shi H, Dobrzynski E, et al: Belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) drives immunogenic cell death and immune-mediated antitumor responses in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther. 20:1941–1955. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trudel S, Lendvai N, Popat R, Voorhees PM, Reeves B, Libby EN, Richardson PG, Hoos A, Gupta I, Bragulat V, et al: Antibody-drug conjugate, GSK2857916, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: an update on safety and efficacy from dose expansion phase I study. Blood Cancer J. 9:372019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Touzeau C, Moreau P and Dumontet C: Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 31:1039–1047. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lassiter G, Bergeron C, Guedry R, Cucarola J, Kaye AM, Cornett EM, Kaye AD, Varrassi G, Viswanath O and Urits I: Belantamab mafodotin to treat multiple myeloma: A comprehensive review of disease, drug efficacy and side effects. Curr Oncol. 28:640–660. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trudel S, Lendvai N, Popat R, Voorhees PM, Reeves B, Libby EN, Richardson PG, Anderson LD Jr, Sutherland HJ, Yong K, et al: Targeting B-cell maturation antigen with GSK2857916 antibody-drug conjugate in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BMA117159): A dose escalation and expansion phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19:1641–1653. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tai YT, Mayes PA, Acharya C, Zhong MY, Cea M, Cagnetta A, Craigen J, Yates J, Gliddon L, Fieles W, et al: Novel anti-B-cell maturation antigen antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) selectively induces killing of multiple myeloma. Blood. 123:3128–3138. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee HC, Raje NS, Landgren O, Upreti VV, Wang J, Avilion AA, Hu X, Rasmussen E, Ngarmchamnanrith G, Fujii H and Spencer A: Phase 1 study of the anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate AMG 224 in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 35:255–258. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Taft D, Henderson C, O'Day C, Yu C, Li H, Ho P and Van Epps H: Pharmacodynamics of SEA-BCMA, a nonfucosylated antibody targeting BCMA, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 138(Suppl 1): 11972021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kumar SK, Migkou M, Bhutani M, Spencer A, Ailawadhi S, Kalff A, Walcott F, Pore N, Gibson D, Wang F, et al: Phase 1, first-in-human study of MEDI2228, a BCMA-targeted ADC in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 136(Suppl 1): S26–S27. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Xing L, Wang S, Liu J, Yu T, Chen H, Wen K, Li Y, Lin L, Hsieh PA, Cho SF, et al: BCMA-specific ADC MEDI2228 and daratumumab induce synergistic myeloma cytotoxicity via IFN-driven immune responses and enhanced CD38 expression. Clin Cancer Res. 27:5376–5388. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffman JE, Lipe B, Melear J, Liedtke M, Schroeder MA, Niesvizky R, Tomasson MH, Yasenchak CA, Green DJ, Li H, et al: SEA-BCMA, an investigational nonfucosylated monoclonal antibody: Ongoing results of a phase 1 study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (SGNBCMA-001). Blood. 138(Suppl 1): S27402021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nooka AK, Moreau P, Usmani SZ, Garfall A, van de Donk NWCJ, San-Miguel JF, Rocafiguera AO, Chari A, Karlin L, Mateos MV, et al: Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Updated efficacy and safety results from MajesTEC-1. J ClinOncol. 40(16Suppl): S80072022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huehls AM, Coupet TA and Sentman CL: Bispecific T-cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy. Immunol Cell Biol. 93:290–296. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Friedrich MJ, Neri P, Kehl N, Michel J, Steiger S, Kilian M, Leblay N, Maity R, Sankowski R, Lee H, et al: The pre-existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell. 41:711–725.e6. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ellerman D: Bispecific T-cell engagers: Towards understanding variables influencing the in vitro potency and tumor selectivity and their modulation to enhance their efficacy and safety. Methods. 154:102–117. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Verkleij CPM, Broekmans MEC, Van Duin M, Frerichs KA, Kuiper R, de Jonge AV, Kaiser M, Morgan G, Axel A, Boominathan R, et al: Preclinical activity and determinants of response of the GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody talquetamab in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 5:2196–2215. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Atamaniuk J, Gleiss A, Porpaczy E, Kainz B, Grunt TW, Raderer M, Hilgarth B, Drach J, Ludwig H, Gisslinger H, et al: Overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor 5D in the bone marrow is associated with poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Clin Invest. 42:953–960. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shah Z, Malik MN, Batool SS, Kotapati S, Akhtar A, Rehman OU, Ghani M, Sadiq M, Akbar A, Ashraf A, et al: Bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody based immunotherapy for treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): A systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials. Blood. 134(Suppl 1): S55672019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Usmani SZ, Garfall AL, Van De Donk NWCJ, Nahi H, San-Miguel JF, Oriol A, Rosinol L, Chari A, Bhutani M, Karlin L, et al: Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-1): A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study. Lancet. 398:665–674. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mateos MV, Bahlis NJ, Costa LJ, Perrot A, Pei L, Rubin ML, Lantz K, Sun W, Jaffe M, Kobos R and Nooka AK: MajesTEC-3: Randomized, phase 3 study of teclistamab plus daratumumab versus investigator's choice of daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone or daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 40(16 Suppl): TPS80722022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Madduri D, Rosko A, Brayer J, Zonder J, Bensinger WI, Li J, Xu L, Adriaens L, Chokshi D, Zhang W, et al: REGN5458, a BCMA x CD3 bispecific monoclonal antibody, induces deep and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 136(Suppl 1): S41–S42. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lee HC, Bumma N, Richter JR, Dhodapkar MV, Hoffman JE, Suvannasankha A, Zonder JA, Shah MR, Lentzsch S, Maly JJ, et al: LINKER-MM1 study: Linvoseltamab (REGN5458) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 41(Suppl 16): S80062023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rodríguez Otero P, Joseph NS, Kumar SK, Lee HC, Leleu X, Manier S, Dimopoulos MA, Mateos MV, Oriol A, Bumma N, et al: Trial in progress: REGN5458, a BCMAxCD3 bispecific antibody, in a phase Ib multi-cohort study of combination regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 140(Suppl 1): S4444–S4446. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Solh M, Bahlis N, Raje N, Costello C, Dholaria B, Levy M, Tomasson M, Dube H, Damore M, Lon H, et al: Efficacy and safety of elranatamab (PF-06863135), A B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 43(Suppl 1): S195–S196. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Raje NS, Jakubowiak A, Gasparetto C, Cornell RF, Krupka HI, Navarro D, Forgie AJ, Navarro D, Forgie AJ, Udata C, et al: Safety, clinical activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics from a phase I study of PF-06863135, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood. 134(Suppl 1): S18692019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bahlis NJ, Costello CL, Raje NS, Levy MY, Dholaria B, Solh M, Tomasson MH, Damore MA, Jiang S, Basu C, et al: Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: The MagnetisMM-1 phase 1 trial. Nat Med. 29:2570–2576. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, Bahlis NJ, Miles Prince H, Niesvizky R, Rodrίguez-Otero P, Martinez-Lopez J, Koehne G, Touzeau C, et al: Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial results. Nat Med. 29:2259–2267. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weisel K, D'souza A, Hurd D, Voorhees P, Teipel R, Chung A, Rodriguez C, Tuchman S, Korde N, Safah H, et al: P862: A phase 1 first-in-human monotherapy study of ABBV-383, A BCMA x CD3 bispecific T-CELL–redirecting antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Hemasphere. 7(Suppl): e00363072023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
D'Souza A, Shah N, Rodriguez C, Voorhees PM, Weisel K, Bueno OF, Pothacamury RK, Freise KJ, Yue S, Ross JA, et al: A phase I first-in-human study of ABBV-383, a B-cell maturation antigen x CD3 bispecific T-cell redirecting antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 40:3576–3586. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vij R, Kumar SK, D'Souza A, Mckay JT, Voorhees PM, Chung A, Tuchman SA, Korde N, Weisel K, Teipel R, et al: Updated safety and efficacy results of Abbv-383, a BCMA x CD3 bispecific T-cell redirecting antibody, in a first-in-human phase 1 study in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 142(Suppl 1): S33782023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kumar S, D'Souza A, Shah N, Rodriguez C, Voorhees PM, Bueno OF, Buelow B, Freise KJ, Yue S, Pothacamury RK, et al: A phase 1 first-in-human study of Tnb-383B, a BCMA x CD3 bispecific T-cell redirecting antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 138(Suppl 1): S9002021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Harrison SJ, Minnema MC, Lee HC, Spencer A, Kapoor P, Madduri D, Larsen J, Ailawadhi S, Kaufman JL, Raab MS, et al: A phase 1 first in human (FIH) study of AMG 701, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) half-life extended (HLE) BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) molecule, in relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 136(Suppl 1): S28–S29. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Goldstein RL, Goyos A, Li CM, Deegen P, Bogner P, Sternjak A, Thomas O, Klinger M, Wahl J, Friedrich M, et al: AMG 701 induces cytotoxicity of multiple myeloma cells and depletes plasma cells in cynomolgus monkeys. Blood Adv. 4:4180–4194. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Costa LJ, Wong SW, Bermúdez A, de la Rubia J, Mateos MV, Ocio EM, Rodríguez-Otero P, San-Miguel L, Li S, Sarmiento R, et al: First clinical study of the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) 2+1 T cell engager (TCE) CC-93269 in patients (Pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Interim results of a phase 1 multicenter trial. Blood. 134(Suppl 1): S1432019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wong SW, Bar N, Victoria Mateos M, Ribas P, Hansson M, Paris L, Hofmeister C, Rodriguez-Otero P, Bermúdez MA, Santoro A, et al: P883: Alnuctamab (ALNUC; BMS-986349; CC-93269), A BCMA x CD3 T-cell engager, in patients (PTS) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Latest results from a phase 1 first-in-human clinical study. Hemasphere. 7(Suppl 1): e12207452023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wong SW, Bar N, Paris L, Hofmeister CC, Hansson M, Santoro A, Mateos MV, Rodríguez-Otero P, Lund J, Encinas C, et al: Alnuctamab (ALNUC; BMS-986349; CC-93269), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 T-cell engager (TCE), in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Results from a phase 1 first-in-human clinical study. Blood. 140(Suppl 1): S400–S402. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Roex G, Timmers M, Wouters K, Campillo-Davo D, Flumens D, Schroyens W, Chu Y, Berneman ZN, Lion E, Luo F and Anguille S: Safety and clinical efficacy of BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 13:1642020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu Y, Zhang C, Cai D, Zhu R and Cao Y: Exosomal miR-155-5p drives widespread macrophage M1 polarization in hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced acute lung injury via the MSK1/p38-MAPK axis. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 28:922023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sperling AS, Derman BA, Nikiforow S, Im SY, Ikegawa S, Prabhala RH, Rodriguez DH, Li Y, Quinn DS, Pearson D, et al: Updated phase I study results of PHE885, a T-charge manufactured BCMA-directed CAR-T cell therapy, for patients (pts) with r/r multiple myeloma (RRMM). J Clin Oncol. 41(Suppl 16): S80042023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Teoh PJ and Chng WJ: CAR T-cell therapy in multiple myeloma: More room for improvement. Blood Cancer J. 11:842021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wehrli M, Gallagher K, Chen YB, Leick MB, McAfee SL, El-Jawahri AR, DeFilipp Z, Horick N, O'Donnell P, Spitzer T, et al: Single-center experience using anakinra for steroid-refractory immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). J Immunother Cancer. 10:e0038472022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lam N, Trinklein ND, Buelow B, Patterson GH, Ojha N and Kochenderfer JN: Anti-BCMA chimeric antigen receptors with fully human heavy-chain-only antigen recognition domains. Nat Commun. 11:2832020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mehta P, Cron RQ, Hartwell J, Manson JJ and Tattersall RS: Silencing the cytokine storm: The use of intravenous anakinra in haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis or macrophage activation syndrome. Lancet Rheumatol. 2:e358–e367. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Minakata D, Ishida T, Ando K, Suzuki R, Tanaka J, Hagiwara S, Ananthakrishnan R, Kuwayama S, Nishio M, Kanda Y and Suzuki K: Phase 2 results of idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) in Japanese patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Int J Hematol. 117:729–737. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang D, Wang J, Hu G, Wang W, Xiao Y, Cai H, Jiang L, Meng L, Yang Y, Zhou X, et al: A phase 1 study of a novel fully human BCMA-targeting CAR (CT103A) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 137:2890–2901. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li C, Wang D, Yu Q, Li Z, Wang W, Hu G, Mu W, Li C, An N, Long X, et al: Long-term follow-up of fully human BCMA-targeting CAR (CT103A) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 142(Suppl 1): S48542023. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Du J, Fu W, Jiang H, Dong B, Gao L, Liu L, Ge J, He A, Li L, Lu J, et al: P869: Updated results of a phase I, open-label study of bcma/cd19 dual-targeting fastcar-T GC012F for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Hemasphere. 7(Suppl 1): e84060bf2023. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Doucet L, Cailleteau A, Vaugier L, Gourmelon C, Bureau M, Salaud C, Roualdes V, Samarut E, Aumont M, Zenatri M, et al: Prognostic value of hPG80 (circulating progastrin) in IDH-wild type glioblastoma treated with radio-chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 40(Suppl 16): S20492022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mailankody S, Ghosh A, Staehr M, Purdon TJ, Roshal M, Halton E, Diamonte C, Pineda J, Anant P, Bernal Y, et al: Clinical responses and pharmacokinetics of MCARH171, a human-derived bcma targeted CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Final results of a phase I clinical trial. Blood. 132(Suppl 1): S9592018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yamaguchi Y, Gibson J, Ou K, Lopez LS, Ng RH, Leggett N, Jonsson VD, Zarif JC, Lee PP, Wang X, et al: PD-L1 blockade restores CAR T cell activity through IFN-γ-regulation of CD163+ M2 macrophages. J Immunother Cancer. 10:e0044002022. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ledergor G, Fan Z, Wu K, McCarthy E, Hyrenius-Wittsten A, Starzinski A, Chang H, Bridge M, Kwek S, Cheung A, et al: CD4+ CAR T-cell exhaustion associated with early relapse of multiple myeloma after BCMA CAR T-cell therapy. Blood Adv. 8:3562–3575. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zwirner NW, Domaica CI and Fuertes MB: Regulatory functions of NK cells during infections and cancer. J Leukoc Biol. 109:185–194. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Padovan E, Terracciano L, Certa U, Jacobs B, Reschner A, Bolli M, Spagnoli GC, Borden EC and Heberer M: Interferon stimulated gene 15 constitutively produced by melanoma cells induces e-cadherin expression on human dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 62:3453–3458. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Li W, Zhang B, Cao W, Zhang W, Li T, Liu L, Xu L, Gao F, Wang Y, Wang F, et al: Identification of potential resistance mechanisms and therapeutic targets for the relapse of BCMA CAR-T therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma through single-cell sequencing. Exp Hematol Oncol. 12:442023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |