Open Access

Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Yu Hu
    • Wuyang Wang
    • Wenqing Ma
    • Wenwen Wang
    • Wu Ren
    • Shixuan Wang
    • Fangfang Fu
    • Yan Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 18, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5475
  • Article Number: 34
  • Copyright: © Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Mental stress may lead to ovarian dysfunction. Psychological stress disrupts ovarian function, leading to adverse in vitro fertilization outcomes, premature ovarian insufficiency and decreased ovarian reserve. Furthermore, psychological stress caused by decreased ovarian function and infertility can exacerbate the mental burden. In animals, psychological stress leads to ovarian insufficiency, resulting in irregular estrous cycles and decreased ovarian reserve. The present study summarizes effects of psychogenic stress on ovarian function and the underlying mechanisms, highlighting involvement of the hypothalamic‑pituitary‑adrenal, sympathetic‑adrenal‑medullary and hypothalamic‑pituitary‑ovarian axes, as well as the neuroendocrine‑metabolic network. Moreover, the present review outlines psychological intervention and metabolic strategies for improving ovarian function, offering potential new approaches for treating ovarian hypofunction. The present study aims to clarify understanding of psychological stress‑induced ovarian dysfunction and propose alternative intervention strategies for ovarian dysfunction and infertility.

Introduction

Globally, stress is a prevalent issue. Mental health obstacles, such as social isolation, fear, loneliness, unemployment, financial instability and loss of family or friends, all contribute to psychological stress (1). Mental stress causes physical health problems, including weakened immune function, hypertension, gastrointestinal issues, cardiovascular disease, sleep disturbance and ovarian dysfunction (2,3). Stress has been widely acknowledged as a key factor that impacts the advancement and onset of ovarian damage (2,4). To the best of our knowledge, however, no consistent conclusions have been drawn on the impact of stress on ovarian function based on epidemiological data, clinical trials and experimental studies (2,4,5).

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that psychological stress leads to ovarian dysfunction (2,6,7). Notably, for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, higher anxiety leads to lower clinical pregnancy (8) and fertilization rates (9), decreased embryo quality (10) and fewer oocytes retrieved (11). A prospective study of 274 patients showed that stress reduced the likelihood of conception during the fertile window each day (12) and participation in stress reduction interventions improves IVF outcomes (11). Mental stress can also affect ovarian reserve, leading to decreased levels of antral follicle count (AFC) (13) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) (14). Moreover, mental stress is also involved in an increased risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) (15), functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) (16) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (17). Furthermore, ovarian insufficiency, such as alteration in female sex hormones, also increases the incidence of depression (18). Similarly, ovarian dysfunction is observed in mental stress models; both chronic unpredictable stress (CUS) (19) and chronic restraint stress (CRS) (20) models lead to depression-like behavior and decreased fertility. Stress can also cause general neuroendocrine system changes, which decrease oocyte quality (21). In recent years, there has been a growing recognition that stress is an emerging risk factor for metabolic disorder (22,23). Metabolic disturbances triggered by stress could lead to conditions such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and ovary damage (2).

The present study aimed to investigate the association between psychological stress and ovarian function based on existing clinical evidence. Research on psychological-associated stress and female reproductive endocrine function from a neuroendocrine-metabolic (NEM) perspective and the underlying molecular mechanisms are summarized. Additionally, strategies to safeguard ovarian function from psychological stress are explored. The present review may provide new perspectives and directions for research and treatment of ovarian dysfunction and infertility.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

MEDLINE (clarivate.com.cn/solutions/medline/) was searched for relevant studies published between January 1960 and December 2023 by using title/abstract terms including 'stress', 'psychological stress', 'mental stress', 'anxiety', 'depression', 'distress', 'cortisol', 'alpha amylase', 'primary ovarian insufficiency', 'Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea', 'polycystic ovary syndrome', 'IVF', 'assisted reproductive technology', 'menopause', 'ovarian reserve', 'anti-Müllerian hormone', 'antral follicle count', 'Chronic stress', 'chronic unpredictable stress', 'restraint stress', 'chronic restraint stress', 'cold stress', 'follicles', 'oocytes', 'granulosa cells', 'ovulation', 'estrous cycle', 'ovarian hormone', 'HPA', 'SAM', 'CRH', 'metabolic syndrome', 'insulin resistance', 'diabetes', 'obesity', 'sleep disorders', 'melatonin', 'psychological intervention', 'cognitive behavioral therapy', 'mindfulness-based stress reduction', 'music therapy', 'yoga', 'caloric restriction', 'metformin', 'resveratrol' or in combination, applying AND and OR operators. To obtain more comprehensive retrieval results, the references of relevant papers were also searched.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research and review articles focusing on the role of stress on ovarian function were included. By contrast, research and review articles focusing on the effect of disorders associated with ovarian dysfunction on mental stress, including communications, case reports, guidelines, comments and protocols, were excluded from the present review. Articles written not in English or without available full text were also excluded.

Data extraction

The title and abstract of every article were checked by two authors (YH and WW). Disagreements were resolved by a third author (FF). A total of 7,623 articles were found by the initial search; 7,316 papers were removed after checking the title and abstract. Next, 307 papers were filtered for full text, of which 183 met the inclusion criteria; 36 were population studies on the effect of stress on ovarian function, 71 were animal models and 26 were psychological and 50 were metabolic intervention studies.

Stress causes ovarian dysfunction

It has been hypothesized that stress may affect ovarian function, however it is unclear whether ovarian dysfunction precedes anxiety or stress precedes ovarian damage (5). Stress is commonly overlooked as a cause of reproductive vulnerability (2). Activation of the stress response system suppresses the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis (24,25). Daily perceived stress can lead to a decrease in estrogen, progesterone and luteinizing hormone (LH), as well as an increase in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in reproductive-aged patients (24). Patients with a history of depression also had higher FSH and LH levels and lower estradiol levels and those having more significant depressive symptoms were twice as likely to experience earlier perimenopause transition than those without such history (25). Additionally, female patients may be more sensitive to lower levels of cortisol than male patients due to increased limbic system activation following repeated stressors (26). The psychological distress caused by decreased ovarian function may further exacerbate the association between psychological stress and impaired ovarian function (Fig. 1; Table I).

Table I

Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function in population studies.

Table I

Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function in population studies.

A, Assisted reproductive technology
First author (year)SubjectsResultsLimitations(Refs.)
Chai et al, 2023110 infertile patients; 112 controlsNo association between serum cortisol levels and IVF cycles (τ=0.071, P≥0.05) and clinical pregnancy (τ=−0.047, P≥0.05).Cortisol may be influenced by other factors(42)
Mirzaasgari et al, 2022154 infertile patientsNo difference in ISE scale between non-pregnant patients and those with positive pregnancy testsLarge drop-off in subjects; low sample size(44)
Bapayeva et al, 2021142 infertile patientsHigher STAI-S and STAI-T are negatively associated with clinical pregnancy (RR=0.95, 95%CI, 0.91, 0.99, P<0.05; RR=0.92, 95%CI, 0.86, 0.99, P<0.05)Low response rate; non-response bias(8)
Peng et al, 2021150 patients without clinical pregnancy after first IVF or ICSI; 300 controlsNo difference between psychological distress and clinical pregnancy (anxiety, adjusted OR=1.00, 95%CI, 0.97, 1.03; depression, adjusted OR=0.98 95%CI, 0.95, 1.02; perceived stress, adjusted OR=0.98 95%CI, 0.95, 1.01)Single time point of psychological assessment; small sample size(45)
Sallem et al, 202179 patients undergoing IVFBAI score is negatively correlated with embryo segmentation (r=−0.24; P=0.05) and implantation rate (r=0.65; P=0.001).No correlation between serum cortisol levels and IVF outcomeNo elimination of some confounding factors(10)
Aimagambetova et al, 2020304 infertile patientsHigher STAI-S and STAI-T are negatively associated with clinical pregnancy outcome (OR=0.94, 95%CI, 0.91, 0.98, P<0.01; OR=0.95, 95%CI, 0.91, 0.99, P=0.02).Non-response bias; small sample size(36)
Park et al, 2019143 infertile patientsNo difference in clinical pregnancy between high or moderate and low stress (FOR=1.11, 95%CI, 0.58, 2.14; FOR=1.37, 95%CI, 0.71, 2.67)Data of baseline chronic stress, life stressors or stress biomarkers was absent(46)
Cesta et al, 2018485 infertile patientsNo difference in clinical pregnancy between lowest and highest categories of perceived stress score (OR=1.04, 95%CI, 0.58, 1.87)Single time point of psychological assessment; other factors may influence cortisol(43)
Xu et al, 2017842 patients undergoing IVFFertilization rate decreases with higher SAS score (91.9%, SAS score, 25-44 vs. 90.4%, SAS score, 45-59 vs. 81.8%, SAS score 60-100], P<0.001)Non-response bias; single time point of psychological assessment(9)
Terzioglu et al, 2016217 couples undergoing ICSIPatients with positive pregnancy outcome had lower depression score (P<0.05)Small sample size(35)
Lynch et al, 2014501 couplesPatients with high SAA levels have a longer time to pregnancy (FOR=0.71, 95%CI, 0.51, 1.00, P<0.05) and double the infertility risk (RR=2.07, 95%CI, 1.04, 4.11)Single time point of psychological assessment; saliva sample collection(181)
Butts et al, 201452 patients undergoing IVFNo association between urine cortisol and clinical pregnancy (β=−0.18, 95%CI, -0.04, 0.02, P=0.48).Small sample size; single time point of uterine sample collection(50)
An et al, 2013264 patients undergoing IVF or ICSISTAI score is negatively associated with live birth rate (OR=0.855, 95%CI, 0.810, 1.006, P=0.03).Response bias; small sample size(34)
Turner et al, 201344 patients undergoing IVFPatients with positive pregnancy outcome had lower STAI-S score (34.93 vs. 44.35, P=0.05), STAI-T 33.67 vs. 41.30, (P=0.03) and PSS score (11.53 vs. 16.20, P=0.03).Response bias; small sample size(37)
Quant et al, 201389 patients undergoing IVF and 77 partnersPartner composite psychological distress score was a predictor of fertilization rate (β=−0.18, SE=0.09, P=0.049).Single time point of psychological assessment(38)
Pasch et al, 2012202 patients undergoing IVFSTAI (39.96 vs. 41.41, P=0.43) and CES-D score (11.29 vs. 12.39, P=0.48) show no difference between patients with successful and unsuccessful outcomesData of psychotherapy treatments was absent; follow-up period was short(41)
Lynch et al, 2012339 patients trying to conceiveNo association between baseline psychosocial and pregnancy rateResponse bias; short follow-up period(47)
Li et al, 2011107 infertile patientsFollicular noradrenaline levels are negatively correlated with embryo quality (r=−0.62, P<0.05) and not correlated with pregnancy rateSmall sample size; insufficient sample representativeness(180)
Anderheim et al, 2005166 patients undergoing IVFNo difference in psychological effects between patients with or without adverse pregnancy outcomesResponse bias(48)
Klonoff-Cohen et al, 2001151 patients with primary or secondary infertilityEach PANAS unit increase is linked to 2% fewer oocytes retrieved (log-coefficient, -0.019, 95%CI, -0.03, -0.01, P=0.04).Small sample size(11)
Csemiczky et al, 200022 infertile patientsPatients with negative IVF outcome had higher state anxiety level (P<0.06).Small sample size(39)
Milad et al, 199840 patients undergoing IVFNo difference in STAI score (42.15 vs. 45.0) and cortisol levels (2.69 vs. 3.12) between patients with or without adverse pregnancy outcomesHigh dropout rate(49)

B, POI

Sun et al, 202243 patients newly diagnosed with POIPatients with POI consistently experienced adverse life events associated with work, family stress and sleep issuesSmall sample size; lack of psychological assessment(52)
Allshouse et al, 2015160 patients previously diagnosed with POIAmong patients with POI reporting a history of depression, 26% reported that depression occurred >5 years before POI diagnosis and menopausal symptoms do not diminish over time in patients with POICertain confounding factors such as treatment of gonadotoxic drugs, treatment of antidepressants, financial status, smoking and alcohol abuse were not eliminated(15)
Schmidt et al, 2011174 patients with spontaneous 46, XX POI; 100 patients with Turner syndromePatients with POI have higher lifetime depression rates than patients with Turner syndrome and community-based samples from female subjects (P<0.001)Confounding factors such as such as treatment of gonadotoxic drugs, financial status, postgraduate alcohol abuse; recall bias(54)

C, Diminished ovarian reserve

Mínguez-Alarcón et al, 2023520 patients seeking fertility carePatients in the second (13.3, 95%CI, 12.7, 13.8) and third (13.5, 95%CI, 13.0, 14.1) tertiles of stress have lower AFC compared with patients in the lowest tertile (14.3, 95%CI, 13.8, 14.9, both P<0.05)Response bias; single time point of psychological assessment(13)
Golenbock et al, 2020332 patients with history of MDD; 644 controlsDepression is negatively associated with AMH levels in patients aged 36-40 years (adjusted PR=0.75, 95%CI, 0.52, 1.09) and nulliparous patients (adjusted PR=0.77, 95%CI, 0.59, 1.00)Cross-sectional design; unrepresentative population sample(14)
Dong et al, 2017576 infertile patientsSAA is negatively associated with AMH levels (r=−0.336, P<0.0001; adjusted for age, r=−0.336, P<0.0001)Only one biomarker for stress assessment(58)
Bleil et al, 2012979 patients aged 25-45 yearsHigher stress levels are associated with higher AFC (β=0.545, P=0.005) and accelerated follicle lossSingle time point of AFC assessment(56)
Bleil et al, 2012683 patients aged 25-45 yearsPsychological stress accelerates AFC decline in patients with low (β=−0.070, P=0.021) but not high positive affect (β=0.018, P=0.54)Response bias; unrepresentative population sample(57)

D, FHA

Dundon et al, 201041 patients with FHA; 39 healthy controlsPatients with FHA have higher depression and anxiety scores in Zung Scale (both P<0.001)Cross-sectional design; response bias(63)
Lawson et al, 200913 patients with FHA; 18 amenorrheic patients with anorexia nervosa; 21 healthy controlsPatients with FHA have higher cortisol levels (9.4 vs. 7.6, P=0.04) and HAMD (6.6 vs. 1.1, P<0.001) and HAMA score (7.5 vs. 1.5, P<0.001) compared with healthy controlsCross-sectional design; response bias(16)
Bomba et al, 200720 patients with FHA; 20 healthy controlsBoth normogonadotropic and hypogonadotropic patients with FHA have higher cortisol levels (16.0 vs. 10.1 and 15.8 vs. 10.1, respectively; both P<0.01)Small sample size(61)
Marcus et al, 200128 patients with FHA; 24 patients with organic amenorrhea; 25 healthy controlsPatients with FHA have higher BDI (7.9 vs. 2.9, P=0.02) and HAMD score (6.2 vs. 2.4, P=0.02)Response bias(62)
Berga et al, 199719 patients with FHA; 19 patients with other anovulation causes; 19 healthy controlsPatients with FHA have higher cortisol levels than those with other anovulation causes (80.1 vs. 67.7, P<0.05) or healthy controls (80.1 vs. 67.1, P<0.05).Cortisol may be influenced by other factors(168)

[i] IVF, in vitro fertilization; ISE, Infertility Self-Efficacy; STAI, State-trait Anxiety Inventory; RR, relative risk; PR, prevalence ratio; CI, confidence interval; ICSI, intracytoplasmic sperm injection; OR, odds ratio; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; SAA, salivary α amylase; PSS, Perceived Stress Scale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression; PANAS, Positive and Negative Affective Scale; POI, premature ovarian insufficiency; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; AFC, antral follicle count; MDD, major depressive disorder; FHA, functional hypothalamic amenorrhea; HAMD, Hamilton Depression Scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory.

Decreased assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcome

In assisted reproductive medicine, one of the most controversial areas is the underlying influence of psychological factors on pregnancy outcomes. Infertility is a serious health problem around the world and female infertility factors account for at least 35% of all infertility cases (27). The risk of anxiety, depression and distress is generally high in infertile patients (28,29). A 2004 study that interviewed 122 patients before their first infertility clinic visit utilizing a structured psychiatric interview found that 40.2% had a psychiatric disorder, including major depressive, generalized anxiety and dysthymic disorder (30). Volgsten et al (31) reported that, of 413 infertile patients undergoing IVF treatment, 127 (30.8%) were diagnosed with psychiatric disorders, with major depression being the most common. In a study involving 352 female and 274 male patients attending infertility clinics in northern California, 56.5% of patients exhibited notable symptoms of depression and 76% showed notable symptoms of anxiety (32). Infertile patients have higher Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (14.94±12.90 vs. 8.95±10.49, P<0.0001) and Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T) score (48.76±10.96 vs. 41.18±11.26, P<0.0001), indicating a greater experience of anxiety and depression compared with fertile individuals (33).

Numerous studies have explored the link between psychological symptoms before and during ART cycles and subsequent pregnancy rates, yielding conflicting results: Certain studies suggest that higher distress/anxiety/depression levels before and during treatment are associated with lower pregnancy rates (8,9,11,34-39), while others do not (10,40-50). These inconsistencies may be attributed to challenges in accurately assessing stress levels in female patients with infertility and heterogeneity of studies (5,28). Future research should therefore focus on developing more precise psychological assessment methods and establishing consistent time points for data collection to enhance quality of research findings.

POI

POI is characterized by premature loss of ovarian function and permanent cessation of menstruation before the age of 40 years (51). Demographic studies confirm that psychological stress, such as emotional trauma, major life events or chronic stress, may be as a potential trigger for POI in certain cases (52,53). Individuals with POI report continuous exposure to family and work stress and sleep problems, suggesting that adverse life events may contribute to development of POI (52).

Among mental disorders associated with POI, depression is most closely associated to POI. A population study involving 290 patients found that 43% of those with POI had a history of depression, with 26% receiving a depression diagnosis before being diagnosed with POI (15). Depression typically emerges following signs of altered ovarian function but before POI diagnosis (54), possibly due to a more fragile stress system. Female patients are more likely than male patients to develop depression and changes in estrogen levels can increase susceptibility to this condition (18,55). Given the lack of prospective studies on pre-diagnosis stress in patients with POI, more conclusive evidence is needed to determine whether there is an overlapping process or causal association between POI and psychological stress.

Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)

Various indicators are used to assess ovarian reserve (OR), with AFC and AMH being particularly promising (51). A study on 979 premenopausal patients aged 25-45 years used AFC measured via transvaginal ultrasound to evaluate OR; the finding indicated a positive association between higher stress levels and AFC in younger patients (β=0.545, P=0.005), and stress accelerates age-related AFC decline (β=−0.036, P=0.031), suggesting women with higher stress experienced faster AFC loss (56). Environmental stress might enhance fertility temporarily by increasing the volume of growing follicles, potentially depleting OR in the long-term (56). Additionally, a cross-sectional study suggested that psychological stress accelerates AFC decline (β=−0.070, P=0.021), implying that low positive affectivity may aggravate the adverse impact of stress on AFC decline (57). Consistent findings across populations reveal that higher levels of perceived stress are linked to decreased AFC and AMH levels (13). A cross-sectional study on 576 infertile patients demonstrated a negative association between salivary α amylase (SAA), a stress marker, and AMH levels (r=−0.315, P<0.001; adjusted for age, r=−0.336, P<0.001) (58). Another study noted modest inverse associations between depression and low AMH among patients aged 36-40 years (adjusted P=0.75, 95%CI, 0.52, 1.09) and nulliparous patients (adjusted P=0.77, 95%CI, 0.59, 1.00) (14). Taken together, data from the aforementioned population studies suggested that elevated levels of perceived stress, as well as biomarkers of stress, are associated with reduced OR.

FHA

FHA or anovulation is characterized by the absence of menstruation and ovulation without an identifiable organic cause. The main determinant of the disease is a combination of psychosocial and metabolic stress (59). Predisposing factors include low energy use, nutritional deficiencies, abnormal sleep, emotional and chronic severe stress and overexertion or physical activity (59,60). More severe depressive and anxious symptoms contribute to onset of FHA (16,61-63). Patients with FHA often exhibit dysfunctional attitudes, such as perfectionism, higher need for approval, and struggle to cope with daily stressors (59). Cognitive behavioral therapy accelerates the recovery of ovarian function in patients with FHA, underscoring the role of mental stress in development of this condition (59). As with POI, more prospective studies are needed to explore the effect of psychological stress on FHA.

PCOS

PCOS is a prevalent endocrine disorder in patients of reproductive age, characterized by systemic metabolic issue and disruptions in neuroendocrine-immune function (64). Patients with PCOS are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular risk factors and associated insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and diabetes (65). Patients with PCOS also face an elevated likelihood of mood and anxiety disorders (17,66,67). There is a notable prevalence of psychiatric issues among patients with PCOS, including depression (26-40%), anxiety (11.6%) and binge-eating (23.3%) (17), indicating a potential role of psychological factors in pathophysiology of PCOS. Psychological aspects have been identified as a notable risk factor for PCOS (68) and emotional distress potentially stems from psychosocial and/or pathophysiological origins (66). Moreover, patients with PCOS may perceive symptom such as hirsutism and acne or potential outcomes such as infertility and obesity as stigmatizing, leading to distress and potentially exacerbating progression of the disease (67). However, as meta-analysis has indicated, few studies have focused on the effect of psychological stress on disease and PCOS (17).

Stress models and ovarian dysfunction

Animal models (69-71), in which the effects of mental stress can be observed, are widely used for studying pathogenesis of stress-related disorders, such as type 2 diabetes, systemic inflammation, obesity and cancer, and their treatment strategies (Fig. 2; Table II).

Table II

Summary of animal models for ovarian dysfunction induced by psychological stress.

Table II

Summary of animal models for ovarian dysfunction induced by psychological stress.

AnimalStressBehavior testStress biomarkerEffects on ovary(Refs.)
C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice8 week CUSN/AIncreased serum corticosterone levelsDecreased follicle number; irregular estrous cycle; increased serum FSH levels; decreased estradiol, progesterone and AMH levels(19,85)
C57BL/6 mice2-8 month CUSSPT, TSTIncreased serum corticosterone levelsDecreased follicle number; increased follicular atresia and ovarian fibrosis; irregular estrous cycle; decreased estradiol and AMH levels and litter size(77)
Kunming mice3-4 week CUSOFTIncreased serum corticosterone and CRH levelsDecreased number of retrieved oocytes and oocyte quality; increased follicular atresia(83,88)
ICR mice6 week CUSSPT, OFTDecreased serum corticosterone and CRH levelsDecreased oocyte fertilization, cleavage and blastocyst formation rate(81)
Swiss mice5 or 30 day CUSOFT, SPT, FST, EPMIncreased serum corticosterone levelsInhibition of follicular development; increased follicular atresia rate; irregular estrous cycle(82,84,87)
Sprague-Dawley rats4-5 week CUSSPT, OFTN/AIrregular estrous cycle; increased ovarian fibrosis, follicular atresia and FSH levels; decreased estradiol and AMH levels(76,79,80)
C57BL/6, BALB/C or Kunming mice4-8 week CRSN/AIncreased serum corticosterone and CRH levelsDecreased oocyte quality; increased follicular atresia rate; irregular estrous cycle(20,21,93,98,104)
Sprague-Dawley rats5 day CRSN/AN/ADecreased progesterone levels; increased fetal resorption(99)
Kunming mice24 or 48 h CRSN/AIncreased serum corticosterone and CRH levelsDecreased oocyte quality; impaired spindle assembly(97,100,101,103,105)
Sprague-Dawley or Wistar rats4-12 weeks cold stressN/AIncreased ovarian NE concentration and serum corticosterone levelsDecreased number of follicles, ovulation and oocyte maturation rate; irregular estrous cycle(106,107,111,112,114,118)
Sprague-Dawley or CIIZ-V rats3-8 week cold stressN/AN/AUnchanged estrous cycle and ovarian tissue structure(117,119)
C57BL/6 mice10 week cold stressN/AIncreased serum corticosterone levelsIncreased number of atretic follicles; decreased serum AMH levels(120)
Sprague-Dawley rats3 week scream sound exposureSPT, FSTIncreased serum corticosterone levelsDecreased AMH and estradiol levels and litter size; increased follicles loss and granulosa cell apoptosis(121)
NMRI mice14 day maternal separation stressN/AN/AImpaired follicle development; decreased oocyte maturation rate(122)
Kunming mice24 h predatory stressEPMIncreased serum corticosterone levelsDecreased oocyte quality and embryo development(126)

[i] CUS, chronic unpredictable stress; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; SPT, sucrose preference test; OFT, open field test; TST, tail suspension test; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; FST, forced swimming test; CRS, chronic restraint stress; NE, norepinephrine; EPM, elevated plus maze.

Stress models of ovary research
CUS

CUS is a well-established method where animals are subjected to unpredictable stressors over a prolonged period to induce emotional changes, which lead to lasting alterations in animal behavior, gut microbiota and neurological function (72-74). The CUS stressors include restraint stress, tail suspension and swimming, with the intensity of stressors gradually increasing to prevent tolerance (19). Depression-like behaviors induced by CUS are evaluated using tests such as the forced swimming test (FST) and sucrose preference test (SPT) (75). CUS exposure has been shown to disrupt the estrous cycle, decrease the number of primordial and preantral follicles and corpus luteum, elevate serum FSH and cortisol levels and reduce serum estradiol, AMH and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) levels, making it an ideal animal model for studying impaired ovarian function (19,76-80).

CUS has been found to negatively impact oocyte developmental potential, with transcriptome analysis revealing disruption in expression of apoptotic genes and cell cycle regulators (81). CUS decreases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in antral follicles, resulting in decreased number of retrieved oocytes and rate of blastocyst formation, which could be rescued by exogenous BDNF treatment (82). Another study indicated that CUS significantly decreased the number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate and number of embryos (including high-quality embryos and blastocysts), which may be due to different expression of heat shock protein 70 in the embryo after CUS (83). Additionally, supplementation with exogenous growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) rescues development of both secondary and antral follicles in stressed mice (84). Granulosa cells in the ovary of depression-like mice induced by CUS exhibit increased apoptosis, possibly due to accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway resulting from downregulation of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 expression (85,86). This suggests CUS can lead to elevated ovarian oxidative stress and mitochondrial dyshomeostasis, supported by increased expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD), mitochondrial fusion protein optic atrophy 1, mitofusin 1 and nucleus-encoded protein succinate dehydrogenase complex A and decreased expression of mitochondrial fission protein 1 in ovary of stressed mice (87,88).

CRS

The CRS model, which is commonly used in studies (89-91) on psychological stress, involves confining animals in a restraint bucket for a designated period each day, inducing anxiety and depression. Typically, animals are restrained for 4 h daily over an 8-week period (20), although the number of restraint days and duration/day can be tailored based on experimental objectives and specific circumstances (92). For example, for studying social interaction, a restraint duration of 5 min is sufficient, however, if the aim is to observe changes in the brain, the restraint time needs to be extended to 6 h (92).

Mice subjected to CRS display elevated serum cortisol and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) levels, indicating activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (21,93-98). Additionally, CRS results in decreased ovarian weight, disruption in estrous cycles, increased ovarian fibrosis and overactivation of primordial follicles, which may be attributed to the upregulation of Kit expression and activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/PTEN/Akt pathway (21). CRS increases oocyte aneuploidy, decreases the percentage of blastocysts and number of cells/blastocyst and impaired corpora lutea function during gestation in mice and rats, leading to decreased pregnancy rates and litter size (99-101). The decline in fertility associated with CRS may be linked to diminished oocyte quality, with germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) being a key indicator of oocyte quality (102). Following CRS, female mice exhibit compromised oocyte competence, which was characterized by an increase in spindles defects and chromatin misalignment, decrease in GVBD percentage and prolonged GVBD time, which may be due to abnormalities of the Fas/FasL system or TNF-α signaling in oocytes and granulosa cells (93,97,98,103,104). Moreover, CRS decreases the expression of cyclin B1 (CCNB1), a key regulator of M-phase/mature promoting factor (93). Treatment with MG132, an inhibitor of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome, rescues prolonged GVBD time and elevates CCNB1 expression in oocytes of CRS-exposed mice (93). Furthermore, CRS elevates meiotic arrest failure in oocytes by suppressing the cyclic AMP (cAMP) signaling pathway, particularly via the downregulation of G-protein-coupled receptor 3, natriuretic peptide C and natriuretic peptide receptor 2, leading to accelerated oocyte loss and premature ovarian aging (20). Short-time restraint stress accelerates postovulatory oocyte aging due to elevated cytoplasmic calcium levels and increased oxidative stress (105).

Chronic cold stress

Animals exposed to cold stress experience heightened sympathetic activity and elevated levels of norepinephrine in the ovary (106-108), while corticosterone and gonadotropin (Gn) levels are unaffected (109,110). As a result, chronic cold stress is commonly used in the examination of overactivation effects of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis. The cold stress regimen typically spans 21-28 days, involving activities such as daily 15-min swims in 15°C water or 3-h exposures to 4°C temperature (111,112).

The majority of studies show that prolonged exposure to cold stress may result in extended estrous cycle, reduced level of estrogen and progesterone, decreased corpus luteum count and increased follicular atresia in rats (111,113-115). The observed hindered follicular development may be attributed to increased nerve growth factor levels in the ovary stemming from sympathetic activation, breakdown of the gap junctions between oocyte and cumulus cells and dysregulation of the NRF2/Connexin-43 (CX43)/steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR)/progesterone pathway in granulosa cells following cold exposure (106). Cold stress triggers the upregulation of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and ET-receptor type A, alongside downregulation of ET-receptor type B protein, thereby disrupting the ovarian vascular endothelin system, leading to vasoconstriction and microcirculation issues in rats (113). This compromised blood flow may impede ovarian function by decreasing oxygen and nutrient delivery to the ovary (116). However, a previous study indicated that prepubertal rats that experience chronic cold stress do not exhibit altered ovarian architecture that affects the ovulation in adulthood (117). When animals were exposed to both chronic restraint and cold water stress, the results were different (118,119): A study showed that the number of atretic follicles and the percentage of apoptotic granulosa cells are notably increased following exposure to restraint stress, while another study indicated that there were no effects on the ovaries after exposure to cold stress (118,119).

Other stress models

A model of high housing density is conducted by housing eight C57BL/6 mice in a 484 cm2 ventilated cage which results in increased stocking density and elevated stress hormones among the mice (120). Mice housed in more densely packed conditions exhibit higher corticosterone and lower AMH levels, alongside a great number of atretic ovarian follicles (120). The scream model subjects mice to noise levels between 45 and 60 dB for 6 h daily over 3 weeks, leading to decreased levels of AMH and estradiol, loss of primordial and preantral follicles, increased apoptosis in granulosa cell and ultimately decreased litter sizes (121). An additional study indicated that maternal separation stress could simulate early life stress (122), with population studies suggesting that early life stress may be associated with an earlier onset of menarche and menopause (123-125). In a previous study, female litters were separated from their mothers between postnatal days 2 and 16 for 6 h/day, with the home cages of the litters placed on a warming pad set at 33-35°C to prevent undue stress (122). After 14 days, there was a significant decrease in the activity of SOD, glutathione peroxidase and catalase, accompanied by oocyte development disorder (122). A predatory stress model suggests that the rate of blastocyst of formation, and the number of cells/blastocyst significantly decreases in stressed mice (126). Chronic immobilization stress could disrupt the estrous cycle, decrease serum levels of AMH, increase the serum levels of FSH and cortisol and reduce the number of primordial follicles (127). In addition, cortisol injection simulates the impact of stress-induced cortisol elevation on ovarian function (128).

While animal models enhance the current understanding of psychiatric disorders, they have certain limitations; for example, animals are incapable of conveying sadness, guilt or suicidal thoughts, which are symptoms mostly confined to humans (129).

Evaluation of stress models

Following successful modeling, the experimental animals display indications such as anhedonia and melancholy, in addition to other signs of depression such as disturbed sleep, alterations in weight and appetite, anxiousness and isolation from social interaction, mirroring the symptoms observed in humans with major depressive disorder (130).

SPT

SPT is frequently utilized to evaluate anhedonia (131-133). Test subjects are provided with a choice between water sources containing sucrose or plain water; decreased appetite for sucrose is considered to indicate anhedonia (131).

FST

To evaluate behaviors associated with hopelessness, FST is employed. The animal is positioned in a cylinder filled with water; if the subject recognizes that escape is unattainable, it may exhibit depressive-like behavior characterized by limited movement except that necessary to keep the snout above the water level (134).

Tail suspension test (TST)

TST is a common method for assessing depressive-like behavior, with the time spent motionless by the subject over a 6-min period recorded (135).

Open field test (OFT)

OFT detects the locomotor activity and exploratory behavior (136). Upon introduction to a new open field, animals display fear of the unfamiliar surroundings by staying along the outer edges, although curiosity spurs them to venture further into the center (137,138). In general, mice tend to hug the walls due to thigmotaxis, moving primarily along the perimeter (137). This behavior is amplified in mice exhibiting anxiety-like traits; mice with lower anxiety levels are inclined to spend more time in the central, open region of the field (137).

Light-dark box (LDB)

LDB box test exploits instinctual aversion to well-lit areas and spontaneous exploration in response to mild stressors, such as novel environments and light exposure (139). The delay in a mouse entry into the dark section indicates an avoidance of the bright area due to anxiety, while movements between compartments reflect exploratory behavior.

Elevated plus maze (EPM)

EPM is extensively utilized for evaluating anxiety-related behavior in laboratory animals, particularly rodents (140-142). Similar to OFT and LDB, EPM exploits the emotional adaptive responses that animals exhibit when confronted with unavoidable aversive situations (143).

Commonly used models for ovarian function research

Recent studies (75,85,98) exploring the effects of mental stress on ovarian function have predominantly employed CUS and CRS models. Animals exposed to stress in these models exhibit decreased preference for sucrose in the SPT and total distance traveled and locomotor activity duration and increased time spent in the peripheral zones during OFT. On the other hand, the cold stress mode primarily activates the SAM system and does not significantly alter mouse behavior and is more appropriate for studying the effects of stress-induced sympathetic nervous activation on ovarian function. These models not only induce depression-like behaviors but also affect ovarian function, such as irregular estrous cycle, decreased ovarian reserve. Thus, they provide a more comprehensive reflection of the impact of psychological stress on ovarian function.

Mechanism of ovarian dysfunction caused by mental stress

During the stress response, the autonomic nervous system reacts instantly by triggering the SAM axis and activating the HPA axis (144). Stimulation of autonomic nerves prompts release of norepinephrine (NE) from neuronal terminals, leading to the activation of the adrenal medulla and subsequent discharge of epinephrine, resulting in activation of the SAM axis (145). The activation of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in the brain induces release of CRH and arginine vasopressin (AVP) into the pituitary portal system. CRH and AVP synergistically stimulate secretion of pituitary adrenocorticotropic hormone, which enters the systemic circulation, reaches the adrenal cortex and promotes the production and release of cortisol (146). Additionally, CRH that is released from the PVN area of the inferior colliculus can activate locus coeruleus neurons, increasing NE production (147). The neuroendocrine system serves critical roles in regulating basal homeostasis and responding to threats and it is also involved in the pathogenesis of diseases marked by imbalance or dyshomeostasis (148-150). Prolonged exposure to life stressors in individuals with a susceptible genetic makeup can lead to visceral fat build-up, attributed to persistent hypercortisolism, reactive insulin hypersecretion and reduced growth hormone secretion (68). Furthermore, in adults, stress can induce hypogonadism, and lead to symptoms such as loss of libido and subfertility (68).

Elevated levels of cortisol have the potential to disturb the equilibrium of hormones key for reproductive function, such as GnRH, LH and FSH, leading to a disruption in ovarian function (151,152). Additionally, stress hormones released by the SAM axis impact the HPO axis by influencing the secretion of GnRH and other regulatory hormones responsible for ovarian function (145). Furthermore, premature cessation of ovulation may be related to elevated serum triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (153). Patients with POI exhibit irregularities in lipid and glucose metabolism (154). Fig. 3 demonstrates associations between psychological stress, HPA and HPO axes, sympathetic adrenal system and metabolic disorders influencing ovarian function, highlighting the role of HPA and SAM axis activation along with metabolic disorder (Fig. 4; Tables III and IV).

Table III

Effect of stress on ovary.

Table III

Effect of stress on ovary.

Cell typeType of stressTest subjectMediatorsImpact(Refs.)
OocyteCUSMiceHPA axisIncreased follicle atresia with suppressed GDF9 expression(84)
CRSMiceHPA axisIncreased abnormal bipolar spindle rates; reduced the expression of CCNB1; increased meiotic arrest failure of oocytes by inhibition of the cAMP pathway; overactivation of primordial follicles due to activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway(20,21,93)
N/ARatsNEDecreased ovarian sympathetic activity decreases KISS1 levels and increases FSHR expression and follicle growth(177)
Injection of cortisolMiceCortisolImpaired oocyte development and mitochondrial membrane potential(128,161)
GranulosaCUSMiceHPA axisIncreased apoptosis due to the ROS accumulation and MAPK pathway activation(85)
CRSMiceHPA axisIncreased apoptosis via activating the Fas/FasL and TNFα system(97,103))
N/AHumansNEInduced generation of ROS in granulosa cells(178)
Injection of cortisolMiceCortisolDecreased expression of IGF1 and BDNFl increased apoptosis(128,161)
N/ARatsNEActivation of TGFβ-SMAD7 pathway and apoptosis(179)

[i] CUS, chronic unpredictable stress; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; GDF9, growth differentiation factor 9; CRS, chronic restraint stress; CCNB1, cyclin B1; cAMP, cyclic AMP; KISS, kisspeptin; FSHR, follicle-stimulating hormone receptor; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NE, norepinephrine; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; TGFβ, transforming growth factor β; ET-AR, endothelin-receptor type A.

Table IV

Effect of metabolic disorder on the ovary.

Table IV

Effect of metabolic disorder on the ovary.

First author (year)SubjectsEffect on ovarian functionLimitations(Refs.)
Qin et al, 2023265 infertile patientsT2DM decreases clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted OR, 0.458, 95%CI, 0.235, 0.891, P=0.022) and live birth rate (adjusted OR, 0.227, 95%CI, 0.101, 0.513, P<0.001)Incomplete medical records; lack of detailed population characteristics(207)
Sekhar et al, 2015600 patients (300 with T2DM and 300 controls)Patients with T2DM have earlier menopause age (44.65 vs. 48.2 years, P<0.01)Assessment of menopause age susceptible to recall bias(206)
Khalil et al, 20112,171 patients (117 with and 2054 without diabetes mellitus)Patients with diabetes have earlier menopause age (48.9 vs. 51.7 years, P=0.005)No differentiation between T1DM and T2DM(205)
Bernardi et al, 20171,654 female subjectsBMI was negatively associated with AMH (β=−0.015, 95%CI, −0.021, −0.009, P<0.0001)Recall bias; association between obesity and AMH lacks generalizability to other racial/ethnic groups(225)
Machtinger et al, 2012Oocytes from 276 patients (105 from severely obese and 171 from normal BMI patients)Oocytes from severely obese patients have higher incidence of double spindles (58.9 vs. 35.1%, P=0.003) and prevalence of disarranged spindles (28.6 vs. 8.6%, P=0.04)Oocytes had been discarded and failed to fertilize, which was unclear if the results are generalizable to fertilized oocytes from the same cohort(236)
Freeman et al, 2007122 female subjectsObese patients have lower AMH levels (geometric mean, 0.016 vs. 0.046; geometric mean ratio, 0.35, 95%CI, 0.13, 0.92, P=0.034)AMH of postmenopausal patients was below assay threshold(227)
Douchi et al, 200283 female patients with obesityPatients with menstrual disorder have higher trunk-to-leg fat ratio (1.48 vs. 11.25, P<0.01)Lack of control group of non-obese patients(229)
Stock et al, 201980,840 female subjectsSubjects working rotating night shifts have an increased risk of earlier menopause (multivariable-adjusted HR, 1.09, 95%CI, 1.02, 1.16)Work schedule information was not detailed(245)

[i] T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

HPA axis

The HPA axis serves a key role in the functioning of the neuroendocrine system, overseeing responses to stress and managing bodily functions such as digestion, immunity, mood, sexual behavior and energy regulation (68). Activation of the HPA axis impacts ovarian function by boosting the levels of cortisol and CRH. Additionally, it can suppress release of gonadotropins, such as FSH and LH, thereby affecting synthesis of steroid hormones, ovulation and menstrual cycle (155). Previous research has indicated that the surge in cortisol and CRH resulting from HPA axis activation, along with the inhibition of the HPO axis, are key factors in impairing ovarian function (156).

In a CRS model, activation of the HPA axis results in impaired oocyte developmental potential and decreased fertility (21,93-95). Previous studies indicated that patients undergoing IVF experienced higher levels of state anxiety and serum cortisol (39,157). Additionally, patients with high anticipatory state anxiety and cortisol concentrations have lower pregnancy rates (158), supporting the link between HPA axis activation and decreased fertility. However, a cross-sectional study of 89 infertile patients revealed that increased perceived mental stress is an independent predictor of increasing FSH levels (β=0.22, P=0.045) and likelihood for DOR (OR=9.97, 95%CI, 1.66, 55.99, P=0.012), but there was no significant difference in serum cortisol levels between patients with DOR and normal OR (r=−0.176, P=0.287), which suggests that serum cortisol levels, representing current stress, may not significantly be associated with ovarian reserve or infertility (159). In direct exposure studies, mouse oocytes exposed to physiological or stress-induced levels of cortisol during in vitro maturation did not show any impact on nuclear maturation or embryo development (94,160). Conversely, injection of cortisol into female mice resulted in impaired oocyte development, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and increased oxidative stress and granulosa cell apoptosis through activating the TNF-α system (128). These effects may be linked to decreased expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and BDNF in granulosa cells and decreased FasL/Fas secretion in ovaries and oocytes (161). The differing impacts of cortisol in vivo and in vitro may be attributed to the indirect influence of cortisol on oocytes via the NEM network. In rats, exposure to CRS leads to increased expression of hypothalamic RFamide-related peptide-3 (RFRP3) and levels of circulating corticosterone, resulting in decreased HPG axis function (95). However, following a complete estrous cycle, female rats exhibit decreased inclination towards mating; the stress-induced reproductive dysfunction in female rats is alleviated by suppressing RFRP3 expression using a cytomegalovirus promoter-driven lentivirus vector. This indicates that elevated levels of RFRP3 under stress may have enduring detrimental impacts on fertility (95).

During stress, the hypothalamus produces a neuropeptide known as CRH, which serves a vital role in the regulation of ovarian functions, as its receptors have been identified in reproductive organs, including ovary, uterus and placenta (162). Previous research has shown that CRH is responsible for activation of primordial follicles in cultured newborn mouse ovaries in vitro (21). Furthermore, CRS could result in a decrease in oocyte competence and an increase in both CRH and CRH receptor (CRH-R) expression in the ovary (97). Co-culturing mouse granulosa cells with CRH activates the Fas/FasL and TNF-α systems, leading to heightened apoptosis of granulosa cells and oocytes, as well as impaired early embryonic development (97,103). CRH-R antagonists such as antalarmin are effective in inhibiting these damaging effects (97). In another study, injection of CRH in female rats for 12 days post-mating resulted in a 40% disruption in pregnancy (163). These findings suggest that CRH negatively impacts reproductive function.

Stress-induced activation of the HPA axis results in increased levels of glucocorticoids in the bloodstream, along with disrupted functioning of the HPO axis and ovarian cycle. In female mice, chronic stress reduces the synthesis and release of LH mediated by GnRH (164). One explanation for decreased LH secretion may be the elevated levels of cortisol due to stress. A previous study on mice exposed to long-term corticosterone demonstrated a notable decrease in LH levels, accompanied by alteration in neuronal activity in the pituitary gonadotroph cells (165). CRS in rats inhibits the preovulatory LH surge (166), while CUS has been shown to raise cortisol levels and SOD activity (87), both of which impact ovulation. Moreover, patients diagnosed with FHA exhibit high activation of the HPA axis, indicated by increased levels of cortisol in the blood (167). Furthermore, patients with FHA who experience spontaneous recovery of ovarian function show lower serum cortisol levels post-recovery compared with those who do not recover from FHA (168).

SAM axis

Ovarian function is regulated by the autonomic nervous system, which cooperates with the HPO axis (169). Sympathetic fibers from the celiac ganglia extend to ovarian follicles, mainly targeting the theca layer, where NE, the principal neurotransmitter, interacts with β-adrenergic receptors situated in the theca and granulosa cells (170-172). Neural and hormonal signals integrate to control steroid production and development of ovarian follicles (173). Notably, during stressful conditions, excessive activation of the SAM axis disrupts this equilibrium, leading to compromised ovarian function (174).

Previous research on rats has shown that normal aging process is associated with elevated NE levels and increased sympathetic activity within the ovary (175), implying that SAM axis activation promotes ovarian aging. Chronic exposure to cold stress activates the sympathetic nervous system, causing prolonged estrous cycle, decreased levels of estrogen and progesterone and corpus luteum count and heightened follicular atresia in rats (114,115,117,176).

Surgical denervation of the ovary and blocking the β-adrenergic receptor using propranolol decrease ovarian sympathetic activity, leading to a decrease in ovarian kisspeptin (KISS1) and an increase in FSH receptor (FSHR) expression. This may enhance follicle growth, suggesting activation of the SAM axis could hinder ovarian function by elevating ovarian KISS1 levels (177). NE is detected in human follicular fluid (178). However, physiological levels of NE are unable to trigger NE receptor activation but can induce the generation of ROS in granulosa cells (178). In vitro, rat granulosa cells display increased apoptosis upon co-culture with NE (179). Furthermore, following recovery from cold stress model, rats exhibited sustained elevated levels of ovarian NE, disrupted estrous cycle and reduced fertility, indicating that SAM axis activation may have lasting impacts on ovarian function in rats (111).

Data from population studies also corroborate the harm caused by SAM axis activation on ovarian function (12,58,180,181). A previous population-based study including 274 patients showed significant decreases in the likelihood of conceiving during the fertile window in the first cycle of attempting pregnancy for patients with high SAA levels compared with those with low levels (fecundability odds ratio, FOR=0.85, 95%CI, 0.67, 1.09) (12). Although SAA is a marker for stress and SAM activity, these findings support the idea that stress impacts female fertility through the SAM pathway (12). Similarly, a study on 401 patients found that those in the top tertile for SAA levels had a 29% decrease in fecundity (longer time to pregnancy) compared with those in the bottom tertile (FOR=0.71, 95%CI, 1.04, 4.11), and this decrease in fecundity leads to an increased risk of infertility (Relative Risk, RR=2.07, 95%CI=1.04, 4.11) (181). Aside from its potential impact on fertility rates, SAM axis activation may also influence OR. A study on 576 infertile patients found that higher levels of SAA were linked to lower serum AMH (r=−0.315; adjusted r=−0.336, both P<0.0001) (58). Another population study involving 107 patients revealed that follicular NE levels had a negative association with proportion of good quality embryos (r=−0.62, P<0.05) but not with clinical pregnancy rates (180).

Metabolic disorder

The activation of stress-associated neuroendocrine systems plays a key role in maintaining body equilibrium, yet excessive stress can disrupt homeostasis (148). Previous studies indicate that life stress poses a risk and has prognostic implications for metabolic conditions such as obesity, T2DM and metabolic syndrome (3,182). Moreover, involvement of the HPA and SAM axes due to mental stress is linked to increased metabolic disorder (183,184). Notably, patients with metabolic syndrome or T2DM exhibit lower OR compared with healthy counterparts (185,186), highlighting the connection between stress, metabolic disorder and ovarian function.

Abnormal glucose metabolism and insulin resistance

Previous research suggests that stressors such as stressful life events, emotional distress, anger, poor sleep and work stress disrupt glucose balance and promote insulin resistance (187). As a result, these stressors are considered independent risk factors for T2DM (188,189) and individuals experiencing chronic stress are at a higher risk of developing T2DM compared with non-stressed individuals (190). T2DM is a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance, both of which may contribute to ovarian dysfunction (191,192).

As reviewed by Dri et al (193), granulosa, theca and stromal compartments of the ovary express insulin receptors, which bind to insulin and IGF-1, dysregulating dynamics of OR and/or impairing the survival and competence of the oocytes. Previous studies in vitro have demonstrated that insulin can stimulate these receptors in granulosa and theca cells, resulting in elevated levels of androgen, estrogen and progesterone (194-196). Prolonged stress and insulin resistance can lead to reduced β-cell function, necessitating exogenous insulin administration (197). Chronic exposure to high systemic insulin levels stimulates ovarian insulin and IGF-1 receptors, resulting in follicle stimulation and increased production of ovarian androgens (198). Persistent hyperglycemia can negatively impact folliculogenesis and ovarian function, potentially via advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and their receptors (191,199). AGEs decrease oocyte developmental competence and vascularization, induce hypoxia and decrease glucose uptake (200). Insulin resistance can also disrupt ovulation by impeding recruitment of dominant follicles, leading to anovulatory states and menstrual irregularity (201). Moreover, in T1DM, folliculogenesis, oogenesis and embryo development are impaired in mice (202), but the underlying mechanism needs to be further investigated.

Previous population studies have indicated an association between abnormal glucose metabolism, insulin resistance and ovarian function (173-180). The incidence of oligomenorrhea is notably higher in patients with T2DM compared with those with normal blood glucose levels (203,204). Additionally, Study of Women's Health Across the Nation Bone, a longitudinal and ethnically diverse research project (n=2,171), observed that patients with diabetes at the start of the study reached menopause ~3 years sooner than non-diabetic counterparts (P=0.002) (205). Similarly, Sekhar et al (206) reported that the mean age of menopause is lower in patients with T2DM (44.65 years) compared with those without T2DM (48.2 years; P<0.01). A retrospective cohort study by Qin et al (207) found that patients with T2DM had significantly decreased AMH levels (2.43±2.31 vs. 3.58±2.58 μg/l, P<0.001), and T2DM was an independent risk factor for clinical pregnancy rate (adjusted OR=0.458, adjusted 95% CI, 0.235, 0.891, P=0.022) and live birth rate (adjusted OR=0.227, adjusted 95%CI, 0.101, 0.513, P<0.001). Furthermore, early menopause (onset at <45 years of age) was found to be more prevalent among patients with T2DM compared with those without T2DM (206). Decreased estrogen secretion post-menopause can increase visceral fat deposition and insulin resistance, significantly elevating risk of T2DM (208), and hormone replacement therapy has been shown to mitigate this risk (209,210). Similarly, decreased insulin sensitivity and impaired glucose metabolism are observed in animal models that underwent ovariectomy, but these effects are reversed by chronic estrogen administration (211,212). These findings highlight the key role of estrogens in maintaining glucose homeostasis. Consequently, stress-induced impaired glucose metabolism may lead to ovarian dysfunction, which can cause further abnormal glucose metabolism.

In summary, stress-induced abnormal glucose metabolism has detrimental effects on ovarian function throughout the reproductive lifecycle. However, more animal studies and cohort studies are required to elucidate the interplay between these factors.

Obesity

Obesity has emerged as a growing health crisis with notable repercussions for public health. In recent years, accumulating evidence indicated that stress, notably increased levels of cortisol, plays a crucial role in the onset of obesity (213-216). Chronic stress activates the HPA axis, which results in elevated circulating cortisol levels. This causes the redistribution of white adipose tissue towards the abdominal area, and also increases appetite, particularly for calorie-dense foods (217). Notably, the obesity epidemic coincides with factors such as elevated cortisol production, prolonged stress, consumption of high glycemic index foods and poor sleep quality (3). The Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological study involving 120,000 individuals found that participants with higher life stress scores (encompassing work, family and financial stress and major life events) exhibited a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity compared with those with lower life stress (218). Moreover, in elderly female patients, central obesity becomes common due to redistribution of adipose tissue associated with aging (219). Similar patterns observed in fat redistribution due to chronic stress and aging in female patients suggest a potential connection between these factors (220). Recent studies increasingly highlight that obesity is associated not only with stress but also with diminished ovarian function (221-223).

Population-based studies have demonstrated an inverse association between obesity and OR (186-192). A cross-sectional study on 36 healthy patients aged 40-52 years showed that AMH and inhibin levels of obese patients were reduced by 77 (0.06, 95%CI, 0.12, 0.67 vs. 0.02 ng/ml, 95%CI, 0.12, 0.67, P=0.02) and 24% (12.5, 95%CI, 10.1, 15.4 ng/ml vs. 9.5 ng/ml, 95% CI, 8.0, 11.3, P=0.08), respectively, compared with normal-weight patients after adjusting for age, body mass index (BMI), race, smoking status and alcohol use (224). In a previous study involving 1,654 African American patients aged 23-35 years, it was observed that obese participants exhibited 23.7% lower AMH concentration (2.9 vs. 3.8 ng/ml) compared with those with a BMI ≤25 kg/m2 (225). This finding has been corroborated by several other research studies (226-228). Additionally, obesity is linked to anovulatory cycles, irregular menstrual period and, diminished implantation and pregnancy rate and it may also be associated with PCOS (229,230). Research on the effects of a high-fat diet (HFD) on ovarian follicular development has indicated a decrease in number of primordial follicles (231). Exposure to HFD results in follicular atresia, and accelerated follicle loss in rats via the activation of mTOR and the inhibition of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) signaling, leading to premature ovarian failure (POF) (232). Previous studies on diet-induced obesity in mice reveal increased oocyte apoptosis (233), the presence of multiple spindles (double spindles) (234) and oocyte mitochondrial dysfunction such as decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial distribution and ATP levels (235). These findings are supported by population studies: For example, Machtinger et al (236) found that severe obesity is associated with a higher incidence of spindle anomalies in failed fertilized oocytes, with observations of double spindles (OR=2.68, 95%CI, 1.39-5.15, P=0.003) and disorganized single spindles (OR=4.58, 95%CI, 1.05-19.86, P=0.04). A recent study reported that an increase in BMI was negatively associated with OR measured by AMH levels in patients with PCOS (β=−0.03, 95%CI, −0.06-0.00, P=0.034) (237). Although direct evidence linking stress-induced obesity with impaired ovarian function is lacking, the aforementioned indirect evidence supports this connection.

Sleep disorder and decreased melatonin

Sleep disorder caused by mental stress are widely hypothesized to be associated with infertility and ovarian dysfunction (238-240). Previous studies on animals have indicated that sleep deprivation (SD) disrupts the regularity of the estrous cycle and results in anovulation, potentially leading to reproductive dysfunction (241,242). Negative effects of SD may impede follicular development during ovarian hyperstimulation due to an increase in corticosterone levels in rats (243). SD has been shown to significantly elevate serotonin levels, which decreases estradiol production induced by FSH and FSH-driven expression of StAR protein in follicles, resulting in decreased estrogen levels in the bloodstream (244). This is also supported by population-based research: A large-scale prospective cohort study that monitored 80,840 patients from the Nurses' Health Study between 1991 and 2013 discovered that working rotating night shifts for 2 or >10 years is associated with earlier onset of menopause (245).

Melatonin secretion decreases with age, which serves a crucial role in regulating sleep and metabolic balance, with its lipophilic nature giving it potent antioxidant properties (246). Melatonin is a key player in combating aging by protecting cells from oxidative damage, a process exacerbated by the natural decline in melatonin levels over time (247,248). Previous findings linked CUS to increased ovarian ROS levels, with ROS-induced oxidative stress being a notable contributor to ovarian damage and aging (85). Previous studies have demonstrated that melatonin safeguards mouse ovarian granulosa cells by mitigating oxidative stress-induced DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipid peroxidation and apoptosis (249), which are associated with the SIRT1/FOXO1 and FOS pathways (249-252). Moreover, melatonin improves oocyte quality by neutralizing ROS generated during follicle maturation and ovulation and fertilization via NADPH, glutathione (GSH), bone Morphogenetic Protein 15 (BMP15) and SIRT1/SOD2-associated mechanisms (253-256). On the other hand, melatonin supplements also significantly alleviated spindle/chromosome disorganization, which may involve the SIRT2-dependent H4K16 deacetylation pathway (257,258). Clinical trials have indicated that melatonin treatment in infertile patients can elevate follicular melatonin levels, reduce oxidative damage and enhance fertilization and pregnancy rates (253,257,259). Importantly, decreased melatonin secretion has been linked to a higher risk of diabetes (260), underscoring the association between melatonin levels, metabolic health and ovarian function.

Intervention strategies for ovarian dysfunction

Psychological intervention strategies for ovarian dysfunction

The likelihood of depression, anxiety and distress is notably high among patients experiencing infertility and psychological symptoms adversely affect fertility (261). Additionally, onset of depression often occurs before the diagnosis of POI, implying that depression and/or its treatment may contribute to development of POI (15).

The effectiveness of psychological interventions in decreasing psychological distress and association with significant increases in pregnancy rates has been shown (5). After receiving antidepressant medication and psychotherapy, infertile patients with depression have higher pregnancy rates (262). Patients with POF/POI may benefit from psychological interventions, as emotional and other menopausal symptoms may be prolonged and not always alleviated by hormone therapy (15). Stress management and psychological therapy have been linked to spontaneous pregnancy in certain infertile couples. Multiple studies have documented cases of infertile couples conceiving naturally after adopting a child (263,264). The aforementioned data suggests that psychological interventions may be a promising approach for these individuals to enhance quality of life.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)

CBT can help patients alleviate stress and achieve relaxation by identifying and analyzing problems, recognizing unproductive thoughts and behaviors, creating and implementing replacement thoughts and behaviors, regular review and adjustment of strategies, and applying learned skills to daily life (265). CBT has been demonstrated to be an effective approach in treating depressive disorder, with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials corroborating its efficacy for both anxiety (266-268) and depression (269,270).

A randomized controlled trial involving 56 pregnant patients with a history of primary infertility indicated that CBT counseling alleviates perceived stress, and anxiety, as well as enhancing the quality of life score (271). Domar et al (272) showed that infertile patients assigned to either structured CBT or standard support groups had a higher pregnancy rate (52 vs. 20%, P=0.05), compared with those who did not participate in these programs during their second IVF cycle; however, P-value decreased slightly to 0.038 after adjusting for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) through logistic regression. Mean stress scores after CBT treatment in infertile patients were significantly decreased compared with before (2.7±0.62 vs. 3.5±0.62; P<0.05) (273), which was confirmed by a previous web-based CBT study (274). Researchers have identified CBT as an effective treatment for enhancing the quality of life (vasomotor symptoms, physical, psychosocial, sexual and total domain) of perimenopausal patients (275-280). A randomized controlled trial conducted with 50 patients with POI revealed mean scores of stress [adjusted mean difference (AMD), −10.97; 95%CI, −11.64, −10.29; P<0.001], state anxiety (AMD, −14.76; 95%CI, −15.77, −13.74; P<0.001), trait anxiety (AMD, −14.41; 95%CI, −15.47, −13.74; P<0.001) and depression (AMD, −7.44; 95%CI, −8.41, −6.46; P<0.001) were significantly lower in the CBT group compared with control group receiving routine care (281), suggesting healthcare providers should employ this method to enhance mental health in these patients.

A study allocated 16 patients with FHA equally to CBT group or an observation group for 20 weeks; 6/8 patients in the CBT group experienced recovery of ovarian activity compared with 2/88 in the observation group (87.5 vs. 25.0%, χ2=7.14) (282). Besides promoting ovulation, CBT has also been shown to lower cortisol levels in patients with FHA (283). CBT not only reinstates ovarian function but also impacts metabolic processes (284). A pilot study on 12 adolescents with PCOS demonstrated that CBT notably decreases weight (104±26 vs. 93±18 kg, P<0.05) and improves depression score (17±3 vs. 9.6±2, P<0.01) (285). Another study involving 15 overweight/obese adolescents with PCOS revealed that weekly CBT + lifestyle modification sessions (LS) for 8 weeks significantly led to weight loss, enhanced quality of life and reduced depressive symptoms compared with those only receiving LS intervention (286).

Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR)

MBSR, a strategy of lessening stress and anxiety through meditation, breathwork and body awareness, is a methodical mindfulness meditation plan that is progressively accessible in medical and healthcare environments to boost mental health and general wellbeing (287). MBSR has been demonstrated to decrease mental suffering and enhance life quality in patients with cancer, heart disease and depressions (288,289).

Individuals diagnosed with POF or POI often experience prolonged mood disturbance and other menopausal symptoms that may not be effectively alleviated by hormone therapy (15), indicating that MBSR may offer potential benefits. A randomized controlled trial including 197 symptomatic peri- and postmenopausal patients found that both MBSR and menopause education control (MEC) decreases total Greene Climacteric Scale score and symptom score reduction of anxiety and depression is significant in the MBSR compared with the MEC group (anxiety, 5.97±2.49 vs. 6.97±2.57, P=0.07; depression, 4.78±2.60 vs. 5.39±2.41, P=0.031) (290). In patients with POI, mindfulness practices have been shown to decrease scores of menopause-specific quality of life (compared with baseline, 48.32±4.96 vs. 95.6±9.77, P<0.0001; compared with control, 48.32±4.96 vs. 102.6±14.9, P<0.0001) and the frequency of hot flushes (6.74±6.34 vs. 23.4±13.9, P<0.0001) (291). MBSR improves emotional wellbeing and biological outcomes in infertile patients (292-294).

Music therapy

Previous research has shown that music therapy has the potential to decrease stress, improve quality of life and alleviate depression and anxiety (295). In a randomized-controlled study of 48 postmenopausal patients, music therapy significantly decreased BDI score (11.81±8.62 vs. 16.44±6.09, P=0.031) compared with control and the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total and sub-scale scores were significantly decreased when comparing before and after intervention (296).

In a study of 40 patients with perimenopause syndrome, music therapy was more likely to improve psychological and emotional symptoms compared with CBT (MRS total, 9.2 vs. 3.5, P=0.008; MRS-psychological, 6.5 vs. 0.9, P=0.004; Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score, 4.3 vs. 1.6, P=0.009) (297). A comprehensive meta-analysis indicated that music therapy decreases the anxiety (MD=−3.09, 95%CI, −5.57, −0.61, P=0.01) and pain score (MD=−2.93, 95%CI, −3.86, −2.00, P<0.0001) and increased the satisfaction score (MD=1.51, 95%CI, 0.40, 2.61, P=0.008) in infertile patients undergoing ART (298). While music therapy increases the clinical pregnancy rates, the difference is not statistically significant (RR=1.08, 95%CI, 0.94, 1.26, P=0.28) (298,299).

Other methods to manage stress

Alongside seeking advice from professional psychologists, individuals may opt for self-care. An evaluation of 166 patients undergoing first-time IVF through a randomized controlled prospective study, examining the effectiveness of a cognitive coping and relaxation intervention (CCRI) that could be self-administered indicated that patients who engaged in the CCRI demonstrated enhanced positive reappraisal coping, better Fertility Quality of Life score and reduced levels of anxiety (300). Another randomized controlled prospective pilot study explored the impact of an online version of the mind/body program (301), where patients assigned to the intervention group showed significant decreases in anxiety and depression, along with an increased likelihood of pregnancy.

Yoga has been shown to be a beneficial intervention for anxiety and depression, stress reduction and enhancement of the overall wellbeing among the general public (302). Furthermore, yoga can alleviate anxiety and depression in individuals undergoing IVF treatment and increase the ART success rate (303). Yoga can enhance the quality of life in relation to infertility, with a specific focus on diminishing adverse emotions and cognition linked to infertility (304). A separate study investigating yoga as a complementary approach for patients receiving IVF treatment yielded comparable results (305). Yoga alleviates the menopausal symptoms, anxiety and depression of menopausal patients and decreases the levels of FSH and LH (306,307).

Frederiksen et al (308) assessed advantages of expressive writing for individuals with from infertility; male and female patients exhibited a noticeable decrease in depressive symptoms. In addition, adhering to a balanced diet, leading a healthy lifestyle and managing work-life balance are potential strategies to alleviate stress and safeguard ovarian function (309).

Metabolic interventions for ovarian dysfunction

As aforementioned, the activation of stress-associated neuroendocrine systems causes metabolic imbalance in the body, and metabolic disorders lead to ovary dysfunction.

Caloric restriction (CR)

CR refers to a reduction in calorie consumption without eliminating essential nutrients (310). CR is hypothesized to extend the lifespan of rodents, yeast, worms, flies and primates by decreasing body weight and slowing aging process (311). CR has been shown to mitigate age-associated diseases such as neurodegeneration, hepatic steatosis and T2DM (312).

Notably, recent studies have shown that CR can protect ovarian function. CR decreases aneuploidy, chromosomal misalignment and meiotic spindle abnormality in oocytes in aged mice (313-315). CR can attenuate aging-associated decrease in chromosomal cohesion and protect the normal progress of meiosis (315). CR enhances ovarian estrogen sensitivity and inhibits ovulation, thereby extending reproductive lifespan (316,317). CR can also reduce primordial follicle activation and lead to increased ovarian Forkhead box O3 (Foxo3a) expression, activation of the SIRT1 signaling pathway and suppression of the mTOR signaling pathway, which may increase preservation of the ovarian primordial follicular reserve and delay menopause onset (318-322).

Obesity impairs ovarian function and obese patients are often encouraged to lose weight before conception to increase the chances of a successful pregnancy (323). However, the protective effect of CR on ovarian function lacks large-scale multicenter clinical trials and CR is a long-term dietary adjustment process that is difficult to maintain (324). Recently, there has been considerable interest in identifying drugs that can mimic the effects of CR. CR mimetics (CRMs) promote lifespan and sustain the health benefits of CR without requiring dietary restriction (325-329). CRMs have good clinical prospects because they do not require long-term dietary restriction and have better patient compliance.

Metformin

Metformin is a widely prescribed medication for management of T2DM (330) that reduces blood glucose by decreasing glucose absorption, enhancing peripheral glucose uptake and increasing insulin sensitivity (331). Metformin can decrease the risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in patients with T2DM (332). Moreover, metformin is also known for anti-aging (333) and anticancer (334) effects.

Metformin has been demonstrated to increase OR and protect ovarian function through regulatory mechanisms such as inhibiting the mTOR pathway, enhancing SIRT1 expression and decreasing oxidative stress damage (335,336). Furthermore, in aged mice, metformin decreases mitochondrial ROS via SIRT3-mediated acetylation of SOD2K68 in oocytes (337). For chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage, metformin may attenuate carboplatin-induced ovarian damage, potentially through its antioxidative effects (338). In addition, metformin decreases aging-related ovarian fibrosis. Metformin-responsive macrophage subpopulations appear in aged mice treated with metformin, which may decrease ovarian fibrosis by clearing fibroblasts that produce the senescence-associated secretory phenotype in aged ovaries (339). Therefore, metformin may serve as a promising drug to protect reproductive function.

Resveratrol

Resveratrol is a derivative of stilbene produced by >70 species of plants (340) in response to external adverse stimuli. Resveratrol has multiple protective effects in mammal models of T2DM, metabolic syndrome, cancer and neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases (341). For example, resveratrol increases SIRT1 levels and improves insulin resistance in a HFD rat model, indicating resveratrol has the potential to combat insulin resistance and maintain glucose metabolism homeostasis (342). Furthermore, resveratrol induces a CR-like transcriptional signature in mice and mimics metabolic changes of human CR (343).

In humans, resveratrol can improve the follicular microenvironment to improve IVF outcomes (344). Intraperitoneal injection of resveratrol during superovulation improves oocyte quality in both young and old mice, and increased the number of oocytes retrieved from old mice (345). Resveratrol improves fertility of reproductive age female mice, which may be achieved by activating SIRT1 and increasing the expression of Foxo3a (346-349). In vitro, resveratrol increased first polar body emission rates and improves oocyte mitochondrial function (350-352). In vitro, resveratrol protects granulosa cells by activating autophagy to resist oxidative stress (353,354). In conclusion, resveratrol is beneficial to ovarian function and protects oocytes.

Conclusion

Psychological stress is associated with poor health and impaired ovarian function (2,4). The present review summarizes the adverse effects of mental stress on ovarian function, which are associated with decreased IVF success rates and OR and the occurrence of POI, FHA and PCOS. Mental stress is involved in the pathogenesis of POI, FHA and POCS (15,17,61). However, more prospective studies are needed to explore the effect of psychological stress in initiation and progression of these diseases. Elevated levels of perceived stress, as well as SAA, could reduce OR (13,56,58). However, salivary cortisol, another biomarker used to measure psychological stress, has no association with fecundability (181). Cortisol exhibits a distinct circadian rhythm, with peak levels occurring in the morning and decreasing throughout the day; thus, it may be important to obtain multiple samples/day from a patient in order to investigate its effects on human health (355). Mental stress has an adverse effect on the outcome of IVF or ICSI, although some studies suggest that there is no association between them (48). To the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported that psychological stress has a positive effect on pregnancy outcomes. Anderheim et al (48) found no evidence that mental stress impairs IVF outcomes. However, Aimagambetova et al (36) found that higher STAI-S and STAI-T are negatively associated with clinical pregnancy outcomes. A potential reason for this discrepancy is that, when filling out psychological questionnaires, patients may not provide accurate assessments of distress. Different inclusion criteria, assessment tools for psychological status and study design may be additional reasons for the inconsistent results. The influence of stress on ART outcomes remains controversial, but, for infertile patients, psychological intervention can alleviate anxiety and depression, potentially resulting in notably improved pregnancy rates. Multi-center clinical trials with large sample sizes are necessary in future research. Under ideal conditions, prospective studies through puberty to perimenopause should regularly collect psychological questionnaires/scales, metabolic and ovarian function indexes to demonstrate causal mechanisms linking stress and ovarian dysfunction.

The present study summarizes animal models used to study the impact of mental stress on ovarian function, such as CUS, CRS and chronic cold stress, as well as evaluation methods. Mental stress affects the follicle and ovarian vascular function via the HPA, SAM and HPO axis and neurometabolic network, in which stress induces granulosa cell apoptosis by activating the MAPK, FAS and TNF-α pathway and increasing ROS, leading to overactivation of primordial follicles and decreasing the number of follicles by activating the PI3K/AKT pathway, as well as oocyte quality by downregulating BDNF, GDF9 and CCNB1, inhibiting the cAMP pathway, mitochondrial energy metabolism imbalance and inducing ROS accumulation. In addition, stress can lead to disorder of ovarian vascular structure and microenvironment by upregulating expression of ET-1 and ET-AR and downregulating expression of ET-BR, leading to a decline in ovarian function (Fig. 4).

Multiple studies have examined the impact of chronic stress on the neuroendocrine system over extended periods (156,356). In the existing studies, traditional biological stress markers (cortisol and α-amylase) have been widely used to assess stress levels of patients and experimental animals (10,58,85,181). However, due to the differences in susceptibility between individuals and evaluation methods, previous results are inconsistent. Obayashi (357) summarized advantages and weaknesses of different salivary stress markers in the assessment of stress, such as cortisol, α-amylase, chromogranin A and IgA and proposed optimization of the method of saliva collection in order to improve the consistency of stress levels. As Shah et al (358) noted, when exploring the association between psychological stress and ovarian function, a comprehensive assessment of stress levels should include physiological markers (such as heart rate variability, blood pressure and cytokine levels) and biochemical indicators (cortisol, catecholamines, copeptin, SAA, IL-6 and C-reactive protein levels), as well as individual subjective assessments (self-reported stress levels, perceived stress scale or psychometric evaluations). Neuroendocrine changes caused by mental stress lead to systemic inflammation, leading to an increase in systemic inflammatory markers and health issues such as cardiovascular disease, cognitive dysfunction and accelerated aging (359). Therefore, inflammatory biomarkers such as TNF-α, HIF-1α and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) may serve as biological indicators to measure mental stress and its impact on physical health. Combinations of different markers and approaches such as wearable device-based stress detection (360) may establish effective stress markers. However, its effects need more clinical research for verification.

Existing studies focus on the direct role of psychological stress on the onset of POI, FHA and PCOS (15,17,61). For example, most studies have explored the impact of PCOS on the mental stress or psychological-associated disease (361-363). Large-scale prospective studies with lager samples are needed to support whether mental stress causes PCOS. Furthermore, the existing evidence that mental stress impairs ovarian function through metabolic disturbances is indirect (207,236). cohort studies and animal experiments are required to determine whether mental stress directly affects ovarian function through metabolism-related diseases.

It is key to elucidate the specific molecular mechanism underlying the effect of on the ovary and provide psychological intervention strategies for patients with ovarian dysfunction, especially for those in need of ART intervention. Hence, psychological interventions (CBT, MBSR and music therapy) may be beneficial to reduce adverse influence of stress and improve ovarian function and reproductive outcomes. The present review may provide an alternative intervention strategy for improvement of ovarian dysfunction and infertility.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

YL and FF conceived and designed the study. YH and FF wrote the manuscript and constructed figures and tables. WuW, WM, WeW, WR and SW revised the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations:

IVF

in vitro fertilization

AFC

antral follicle count

AMH

anti-Müllerian hormone

POI

premature ovarian insufficiency

FHA

functional hypothalamic amenorrhea

PCOS

polycystic ovary syndrome

CUS

chronic unpredictable stress

CRS

chronic restraint stress

T2DM

type 2 diabetes mellitus

NEM

neuroendocrine-metabolic

HPO

hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian

LH

luteinizing hormone

FSHR

follicle-stimulating hormone receptor

ART

assisted reproductive technology

BDI

Beck Depression Inventory

STAI-T

Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory

DOR

diminished ovarian reserve

SAA

salivary α amylase

FST

forced swimming test

SPT

sucrose preference test

GnRH

gonadotropin-releasing hormone

BDNF

brain-derived neurotrophic factor

GDF

growth differentiation factor

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SOD

superoxide dismutase

CRH-R

corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor

HPA

hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

GVBD

germinal vesicle breakdown

CCNB1

cyclin B1

SAM

sympathetic-adrenal-medullary

StAR

steroidogenic acute regulatory

ET-1

endothelin-1

TST

tail suspension test

OFT

open field test

LDB

light-dark box

EPM

elevated plus maze

PVN

paraventricular nucleus

AVP

arginine vasopressin

IGF

insulin-like growth factor

RFRP3

RFamide-related peptide-3

KISS

kisspeptin

AGE

advanced glycation end-product

BMI

body mass index

HFD

high-fat diet

SIRT1

sirtuin 1

POF

premature ovarian failure

CBT

cognitive behavioral therapy

AMD

adjusted mean difference

MBSR

mindfulness-based stress reduction

MEC

menopause education control

MRS

Menopause Rating Scale

CCRI

cognitive coping and relaxation intervention

CRM

caloric restriction mimetic

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2022YFC2704100 and 2021YFC2700402-02) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81902669).

References

1 

Wang S, Quan L, Chavarro JE, Slopen N, Kubzansky LD, Koenen KC, Kang JH, Weisskopf MG, Branch-Elliman W and Roberts AL: Associations of depression, anxiety, worry, perceived stress, and loneliness prior to infection with risk of post-COVID-19 conditions. JAMA Psychiatry. 79:1081–1091. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Valsamakis G, Chrousos G and Mastorakos G: Stress, female reproduction and pregnancy. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 100:48–57. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Kivimäki M, Bartolomucci A and Kawachi I: The multiple roles of life stress in metabolic disorders. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 19:10–27. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Bala R, Singh V, Rajender S and Singh K: Environment, lifestyle, and female infertility. Reprod Sci. 28:617–638. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Rooney KL and Domar AD: The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 20:41–47. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Maeda E, Nomura K, Hiraike O, Sugimori H, Kinoshita A and Osuga Y: Domestic work stress and self-rated psychological health among women: A cross-sectional study in Japan. Environ Health Prev Med. 24:752019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Liu Y and Aungsuroch Y: Work stress, perceived social support, self-efficacy and burnout among Chinese registered nurses. J Nurs Manag. 27:1445–1453. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Bapayeva G, Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, Terzic S, Ukybassova T, Aldiyarova A, Utepova G, Daribay Z, Bekbossinova G, Balykov A, et al: The effect of stress, anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilization outcome in kazakhstani public clinical setting: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 10:9372021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Xu H, Ouyang N, Li R, Tuo P, Mai M and Wang W: The effects of anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilisation outcomes of infertile Chinese women. Psychol Health Med. 22:37–43. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Sallem A, Essoussi H, Mustapha HB, Zaouali M and Ajina M: Impact of psychological stress on the outcomes of assisted reproduction in Tunisian infertile women. Pan Afr Med J. 40:2502021. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Klonoff-Cohen H, Chu E, Natarajan L and Sieber W: A prospective study of stress among women undergoing in vitro fertilization or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Fertil Steril. 76:675–687. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Buck Louis GM, Lum KJ, Sundaram R, Chen Z, Kim S, Lynch CD, Schisterman EF and Pyper C: Stress reduces conception probabilities across the fertile window: Evidence in support of relaxation. Fertil Steril. 95:2184–2189. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Mínguez-Alarcón L, Williams PL, Souter I, Ford JB, Hauser R and Chavarro JE; Earth Study Team: Perceived stress and markers of ovarian reserve among subfertile women. Reprod Biomed Online. 46:956–964. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Golenbock SW, Wise LA, Lambert-Messerlian GM, Eklund EE and Harlow BL: Association between a history of depression and anti-müllerian hormone among late-reproductive aged women: The Harvard study of moods and cycles. Womens Midlife Health. 6:92020. View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Allshouse AA, Semple AL and Santoro NF: Evidence for prolonged and unique amenorrhea-related symptoms in women with premature ovarian failure/primary ovarian insufficiency. Menopause. 22:166–174. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Lawson EA, Donoho D, Miller KK, Misra M, Meenaghan E, Lydecker J, Wexler T, Herzog DB and Klibanski A: Hypercortisolemia is associated with severity of bone loss and depression in hypothalamic amenorrhea and anorexia nervosa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 94:4710–4716. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G and Azziz R: Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 7:219–231. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H and Nelson DB: Associations of hormones and menopausal status with depressed mood in women with no history of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 63:375–382. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Gao L, Zhao F, Zhang Y, Wang W and Cao Q: Diminished ovarian reserve induced by chronic unpredictable stress in C57BL/6 mice. Gynecol Endocrinol. 36:49–54. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Jiang Y, Xu J, Tao C, Lin Y, Lin X, Li K, Liu Q, Saiyin H, Hu S, Yao G, et al: Chronic stress induces meiotic arrest failure and ovarian reserve decline via the cAMP signaling pathway. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 14:11770612023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Xu M, Sun J, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Wei C and Lai D: Chronic restraint stress induces excessive activation of primordial follicles in mice ovaries. PLoS One. 13:e01948942018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Poole L and Hackett RA: Diabetes distress: The psychological burden of living with diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 12:439–441. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Bartoskova Polcrova A, Dalecka A, Szabo D, Gonzalez Rivas JP, Bobak M and Pikhart H: Social and environmental stressors of cardiometabolic health. Sci Rep. 14:141792024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Schliep KC, Mumford SL, Vladutiu CJ, Ahrens KA, Perkins NJ, Sjaarda LA, Kissell KA, Prasad A, Wactawski-Wende J and Schisterman EF: Perceived stress, reproductive hormones, and ovulatory function: A prospective cohort study. Epidemiology. 26:177–184. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Harlow BL, Wise LA, Otto MW, Soares CN and Cohen LS: Depression and its influence on reproductive endocrine and menstrual cycle markers associated with perimenopause: The Harvard study of moods and cycles. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 60:29–36. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Albert KM and Newhouse PA: Estrogen, stress, and depression: cognitive and biological interactions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 15:399–423. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Yatsenko SA and Rajkovic A: Genetics of human female infertility. Biol Reprod. 101:549–566. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Matthiesen SMS, Frederiksen Y, Ingerslev HJ and Zachariae R: Stress, distress and outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART): A meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 26:2763–2776. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Massey AJ, Campbell B, Raine-Fenning N, Aujla N and Vedhara K: The association of physiological cortisol and IVF treatment outcomes: A systematic review. Reprod Med Biol. 13:161–176. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Chen TH, Chang SP, Tsai CF and Juang KD: Prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders in an assisted reproductive technique clinic. Hum Reprod. 19:2313–2318. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Volgsten H, Skoog Svanberg A, Ekselius L, Lundkvist O and Sundström Poromaa I: Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 23:2056–2063. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Pasch LA, Holley SR, Bleil ME, Shehab D, Katz PP and Adler NE: Addressing the needs of fertility treatment patients and their partners: Are they informed of and do they receive mental health services? Fertil Steril. 106:209–215.e2. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Lakatos E, Szigeti JF, Ujma PP, Sexty R and Balog P: Anxiety and depression among infertile women: A cross-sectional survey from Hungary. BMC Womens Health. 17:482017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

An Y, Sun Z, Li L, Zhang Y and Ji H: Relationship between psychological stress and reproductive outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: Psychological and neurohormonal assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 30:35–41. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

35 

Terzioglu F, Turk R, Yucel C, Dilbaz S, Cinar O and Karahalil B: The effect of anxiety and depression scores of couples who underwent assisted reproductive techniques on the pregnancy outcomes. Afr Health Sci. 16:441–450. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, Terzic S, Bapayeva G, Ukybassova T, Baikoshkarova S, Aldiyarova A, Shauyen F and Terzic M: The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: Reality or speculations? PLoS One. 15:e02420242020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Turner K, Reynolds-May MF, Zitek EM, Tisdale RL, Carlisle AB and Westphal LM: Stress and anxiety scores in first and repeat IVF cycles: A pilot study. PLoS One. 8:e637432013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Quant HS, Zapantis A, Nihsen M, Bevilacqua K, Jindal S and Pal L: Reproductive implications of psychological distress for couples undergoing IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 30:1451–1458. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Csemiczky G, Landgren BM and Collins A: The influence of stress and state anxiety on the outcome of IVF-treatment: Psychological and endocrinological assessment of Swedish women entering IVF-treatment: Stress and state anxiety on outcome of IVF-treatment. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 79:113–118. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Boivin J, Griffiths E and Venetis CA: Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: Meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ. 342:d2232011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Pasch LA, Gregorich SE, Katz PK, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Bleil ME and Adler NE: Psychological distress and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 98:459–464. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Chai Y, Li Q, Wang Y, Niu B, Chen H, Fan T, Ke X and Zou H: Cortisol dysregulation in anxiety infertile women and the influence on IVF treatment outcome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 14:11077652023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Cesta CE, Johansson ALV, Hreinsson J, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Olofsson JI, Holte J, Wramsby H, Wramsby M, Cnattingius S, Skalkidou A and Nyman Iliadou A: A prospective investigation of perceived stress infertility-related stress and cortisol levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: Influence on embryo quality and clinical pregnancy rate. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 97:258–268. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Mirzaasgari H, Momeni F, Pourshahbaz A, Keshavarzi F and Hatami M: The relationship between coping strategies and infertility self-efficacy with pregnancy outcomes of women undergoing in vitro fertilization: A prospective cohort study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 20:539–548. 2022.PubMed/NCBI

45 

Peng M, Wen M, Jiang T, Jiang Y, Lv H, Chen T, Ling X, Li H, Meng Q, Huang B, et al: Stress, anxiety, and depression in infertile couples are not associated with a first IVF or ICSI treatment outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 21:7252021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Park J, Stanford JB, Porucznik CA, Christensen K and Schliep KC: Daily perceived stress and time to pregnancy: A prospective cohort study of women trying to conceive. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 110:1044462019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Lynch CD, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM, Lum KJ and Pyper C: Are increased levels of self-reported psychosocial stress, anxiety, and depression associated with fecundity? Fertil Steril. 98:453–458. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Anderheim L, Holter H, Bergh C and Möller A: Does psychological stress affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod. 20:2969–2975. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Milad MP, Klock SC, Moses S and Chatterton R: Stress and anxiety do not result in pregnancy wastage. Hum Reprod. 13:2296–2300. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Butts CD, Bloom MS, Frye CA, Walf AA, Parsons PJ, Steuerwald AJ, Ilonze C and Fujimoto VY: Urine cortisol concentration as a biomarker of stress is unrelated to IVF outcomes in women and men. J Assist Reprod Genet. 31:1647–1653. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Stuenkel CA and Gompel A: Primary ovarian insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 388:154–163. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Sun J, Fan Y, Guo Y, Pan H, Zhang C, Mao G, Huang Y, Li B, Gu T, Wang L, et al: Chronic and cumulative adverse life events in women with primary ovarian insufficiency: An exploratory qualitative study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13:8560442022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Xu YP, Fu JC, Hong ZL, Zeng DF, Guo CQ, Li P and Wu JX: Psychological stressors involved in the pathogenesis of premature ovarian insufficiency and potential intervention measures. Gynecol Endocrinol. 40:23600852024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Schmidt PJ, Luff JA, Haq NA, Vanderhoof VH, Koziol DE, Calis KA, Rubinow DR and Nelson LM: Depression in women with spontaneous 46, XX primary ovarian insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 96:E278–E287. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :

55 

Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Liu L, Gracia CR, Nelson DB and Hollander L: Hormones and menopausal status as predictors of depression in womenin transition to menopause. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 61:62–70. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Bleil ME, Adler NE, Pasch LA, Sternfeld B, Gregorich SE, Rosen MP and Cedars MI: Psychological stress and reproductive aging among pre-menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 27:2720–2728. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Bleil ME, Adler NE, Pasch LA, Sternfeld B, Gregorich SE, Rosen MP and Cedars MI: Depressive symptomatology, psychological stress, and ovarian reserve: A role for psychological factors in ovarian aging? Menopause. 19:1176–1185. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Dong YZ, Zhou FJ and Sun YP: Psychological stress is related to a decrease of serum anti-müllerian hormone level in infertile women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 15:512017. View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Lania A, Gianotti L, Gagliardi I, Bondanelli M, Vena W and Ambrosio MR: Functional hypothalamic and drug-induced amenorrhea: An overview. J Endocrinol Invest. 42:1001–1010. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Gordon CM, Ackerman KE, Berga SL, Kaplan JR, Mastorakos G, Misra M, Murad MH, Santoro NF and Warren MP: Functional hypothalamic amenorrhea: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 102:1413–1439. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Bomba M, Gambera A, Bonini L, Peroni M, Neri F, Scagliola P and Nacinovich R: Endocrine profiles and neuropsychologic correlates of functional hypothalamic amenorrhea in adolescents. Fertil Steril. 87:876–885. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Marcus MD, Loucks TL and Berga SL: Psychological correlates of functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 76:310–316. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Dundon CM, Rellini AH, Tonani S, Santamaria V and Nappi R: Mood disorders and sexual functioning in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. Fertil Steril. 94:2239–2243. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Cai J, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li S, Wang L, Zheng J, Jiang Y, Dong Y, Zhou H, Hu Y, et al: High thyroid stimulating hormone level is associated with hyperandrogenism in euthyroid polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women, independent of age, BMI, and thyroid autoimmunity: A cross-sectional analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 10:2222019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Chang AY, Lalia AZ, Jenkins GD, Dutta T, Carter RE, Singh RJ and Nair KS: Combining a nontargeted and targeted metabolomics approach to identify metabolic pathways significantly altered in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 71:52–63. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Farrell K and Antoni MH: Insulin resistance, obesity, inflammation, and depression in polycystic ovary syndrome: Biobehavioral mechanisms and interventions. Fertil Steril. 94:1565–1574. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Hillman SC, Bryce C, Caleyachetty R and Dale J: Women's experiences of diagnosis and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: A mixed-methods study in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 70:e322–e329. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Chrousos GP: Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 5:374–381. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Kleinert M, Clemmensen C, Hofmann SM, Moore MC, Renner S, Woods SC, Huypens P, Beckers J, de Angelis MH, Schürmann A, et al: Animal models of obesity and diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 14:140–162. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

70 

Seemann S, Zohles F and Lupp A: Comprehensive comparison of three different animal models for systemic inflammation. J Biomed Sci. 24:602017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

71 

Cheon DJ and Orsulic S: Mouse models of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 6:95–119. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Antoniuk S, Bijata M, Ponimaskin E and Wlodarczyk J: Chronic unpredictable mild stress for modeling depression in rodents: Meta-analysis of model reliability. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 99:101–116. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Du Preez A, Onorato D, Eiben I, Musaelyan K, Egeland M, Zunszain PA, Fernandes C, Thuret S and Pariante CM: Chronic stress followed by social isolation promotes depressive-like behaviour, alters microglial and astrocyte biology and reduces hippocampal neurogenesis in male mice. Brain Behav Immun. 91:24–47. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Khan AR, Geiger L, Wiborg O and Czéh B: Stress-induced morphological, cellular and molecular changes in the brain-lessons learned from the chronic mild stress model of depression. Cells. 9:10262020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

75 

Xiang Y, Jiang L, Gou J, Sun Y, Zhang D, Xin X, Song Z and Huang J: Chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced mouse ovarian insufficiency by interrupting lipid homeostasis in the ovary. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:9336742022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

76 

Fu XY, Chen HH, Zhang N, Ding MX, Qiu YE, Pan XM, Fang YS, Lin YP, Zheng Q and Wang WQ: Effects of chronic unpredictable mild stress on ovarian reserve in female rats: Feasibility analysis of a rat model of premature ovarian failure. Mol Med Rep. 18:532–540. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

77 

Ma J, Wang L, Yang D, Luo J, Gao J, Wang J, Guo H, Li J, Wang F, Wu J and Hu R: Chronic stress causes ovarian fibrosis to impair female fertility in mice. Cell Signal. 122:1113342024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

78 

Ding SM, Shi LG, Xing F, Cui SS, Cheng HR, Liu Y, Ji DM, Liang D, Cao YX and Liu YJ: Melatonin protects against mitochondrial dyshomeostasis and ovarian damage caused by chronic unpredictable mild stress through the eIF2α-AFT4 signaling pathway in mice. Reprod Sci. 31:3191–3201. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

79 

Fu X, Zheng Q, Zhang N, Ding M, Pan X, Wang W and Chen H: CUMS promotes the development of premature ovarian insufficiency mediated by nerve growth factor and its receptor in rats. BioMed Res Int. 2020:19468532020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

80 

Xu HX, Lin SX, Gong Y, Huo ZX, Zhao CY, Zhu HM and Xi SY: Chaiyu-dixian formula exerts protective effects on ovarian follicular abnormal development in chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rat model. Front Pharmacol. 11:2452020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

81 

Zhao X, Ma R, Zhang X, Cheng R, Jiang N, Guo M, Rong B, Liu Y, Chen M, Feng W and Xia T: Reduced growth capacity of preimplantation mouse embryos in chronic unpredictable stress model. Mol Reprod Dev. 88:80–95. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Wu LM, Hu MH, Tong XH, Han H, Shen N, Jin RT, Wang W, Zhou GX, He GP and Liu YS: Chronic unpredictable stress decreases expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in mouse ovaries: relationship to oocytes developmental potential. PLoS One. 7:e523312012. View Article : Google Scholar

83 

Li XH, Pang HQ, Qin L, Jin S, Zeng X, Bai Y and Li SW: HSP70 overexpression may play a protective role in the mouse embryos stimulated by CUMS. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 13:1252015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

84 

Wu LM, Liu YS, Tong XH, Shen N, Jin RT, Han H, Hu MH, Wang W and Zhou GX: Inhibition of follicular development induced by chronic unpredictable stress is associated with growth and differentiation factor 9 and gonadotropin in mice. Biol Reprod. 86:1212012. View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Sun J, Guo Y, Fan Y, Wang Q, Zhang Q and Lai D: Decreased expression of IDH1 by chronic unpredictable stress suppresses proliferation and accelerates senescence of granulosa cells through ROS activated MAPK signaling pathways. Free Radic Biol Med. 169:122–136. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

86 

Du Y, Ma J, Wu T, Li F, Pan J, Du L, Zhang M, Diao X and Wu R: Downgrading breast imaging reporting and data system categories in ultrasound using strain elastography and computer-aided diagnosis system: A multicenter, prospective study. Br J Radiol. 97:1653–1660. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

87 

Kala M and Nivsarkar M: Role of cortisol and superoxide dismutase in psychological stress induced anovulation. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 225:117–124. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Gao Y, Chen F, Kong QQ, Ning SF, Yuan HJ, Lian HY, Luo MJ and Tan JH: Stresses on female mice impair oocyte developmental potential: Effects of stress severity and duration on oocytes at the growing follicle stage. Reprod Sci. 23:1148–1157. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

89 

Scott K, Phan TT, Boukelmoune N, Heijnen CJ and Dantzer R: Chronic restraint stress impairs voluntary wheel running but has no effect on food-motivated behavior in mice. Brain Behav Immun. 107:319–329. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar

90 

Chen H, Fu S, Li X, Shi M, Qian J, Zhao S, Yuan P, Ding L, Xia X and Zheng JC: Microglial glutaminase 1 mediates chronic restraint stress-induced depression-like behaviors and synaptic damages. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 8:4522023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

91 

Chiba S, Numakawa T, Ninomiya M, Richards MC, Wakabayashi C and Kunugi H: Chronic restraint stress causes anxiety- and depression-like behaviors, downregulates glucocorticoid receptor expression, and attenuates glutamate release induced by brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the prefrontal cortex. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 39:112–119. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

92 

Buynitsky T and Mostofsky DI: Restraint stress in biobehavioral research: Recent developments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 33:1089–1098. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

93 

Sun J, Guo Y, Zhang Q, Bu S, Li B, Wang Q and Lai D: Chronic restraint stress disturbs meiotic resumption through APC/C-mediated cyclin B1 excessive degradation in mouse oocytes. Cell Cycle. 17:1591–1601. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

94 

Zhang SY, Wang JZ, Li JJ, Wei DL, Sui HS, Zhang ZH, Zhou P and Tan JH: Maternal restraint stress diminishes the developmental potential of oocytes. Biol Reprod. 84:672–681. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Geraghty AC, Muroy SE, Zhao S, Bentley GE, Kriegsfeld LJ and Kaufer D: Knockdown of hypothalamic RFRP3 prevents chronic stress-induced infertility and embryo resorption. Life. 4:e043162015.

96 

Liang B, Wei DL, Cheng YN, Yuan HJ, Lin J, Cui XZ, Luo MJ and Tan JH: Restraint stress impairs oocyte developmental potential in mice: Role of CRH-induced apoptosis of ovarian cells. Biol Reprod. 89:642013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

97 

Li CY, Li ZB, Kong QQ, Han X, Xiao B, Li X, Chang ZL and Tan JH: Restraint-induced corticotrophin-releasing hormone elevation triggers apoptosis of ovarian cells and impairs oocyte competence via activation of the Fas/FasL system. Biol Reprod. 99:828–837. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

98 

Huang Y, Liu Q, Huang G, Wen J and Chen G: Hypothalamic kisspeptin neurons regulates energy metabolism and reproduction under chronic stress. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 13:8443972022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

99 

Sugino N, Nakamura Y, Okuno N, Shimamura K, Teyama T, Ishimatsu M and Kato H: Effects of restraint stress on luteal function in rats during mid-pregnancy. J Reprod Fertil. 101:23–26. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

100 

Zhou P, Lian HY, Cui W, Wei DL, Li Q, Liu YX, Liu XY and Tan JH: Maternal-restraint stress increases oocyte aneuploidy by impairing metaphase I spindle assembly and reducing spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in mice. Biol Reprod. 86:832012. View Article : Google Scholar

101 

Lian HY, Gao Y, Jiao GZ, Sun MJ, Wu XF, Wang TY, Li H and Tan JH: Antioxidant supplementation overcomes the deleterious effects of maternal restraint stress-induced oxidative stress on mouse oocytes. Reproduction. 146:559–568. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

102 

Higaki S, Kishi M, Koyama K, Nagano M, Katagiri S, Takada T and Takahashi Y: Early germinal vesicle breakdown is a predictor of high preimplantation developmental competent oocytes in mice. Zygote. 25:41–48. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

103 

Zhao XY, Li ZB, Yuan HJ, Han X, Wu JS, Feng XY, Zhang M and Tan JH: Restraint stress and elevation of corticotrophin-releasing hormone in female mice impair oocyte competence through activation of the tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) system. Reprod Fertil Dev. 32:862–872. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

104 

Guo Y, Sun J, Bu S, Li B, Zhang Q, Wang Q and Lai D: Melatonin protects against chronic stress-induced oxidative meiotic defects in mice MII oocytes by regulating SIRT1. Cell Cycle. 19:1677–1695. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

105 

Chen RR, Wang J, Zhang M, Kong QQ, Sun GY, Jin CH and Tan JH: Restraint stress of female mice during oocyte development facilitates oocyte postovulatory aging. Aging (Albany NY). 14:9186–9199. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

106 

Dorfman M, Arancibia S, Fiedler JL and Lara HE: Chronic intermittent cold stress activates ovarian sympathetic nerves and modifies ovarian follicular development in the rat. Biol Reprod. 68:2038–2043. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

107 

Bernuci MP, Szawka RE, Helena CVV, Leite CM, Lara HE and Anselmo-Franci JA: Locus coeruleus mediates cold stress-induced polycystic ovary in rats. Endocrinology. 149:2907–2916. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

108 

Barra R, Cruz G, Mayerhofer A, Paredes A and Lara HE: Maternal sympathetic stress impairs follicular development and puberty of the offspring. Reproduction. 148:137–145. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

109 

Bernuci MP, Leite CM, Barros P, Kalil B, Leoni GB, Del Bianco-Borges B, Franci CR, Szawka RE, Lara HE and Anselmo-Franci JA: Transitory activation of the central and ovarian norepinephrine systems during cold stress-induced polycystic ovary in rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 25:23–33. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

110 

Pacak K, Palkovits M, Yadid G, Kvetnansky R, Kopin IJ and Goldstein DS: Heterogeneous neurochemical responses to different stressors: A test of Selye's doctrine of nonspecificity. Am J Physiol. 275:R1247–R1255. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

111 

Riquelme R, Ruz F, Mayerhofer A and Lara HE: Role of ovarian sympathetic nerves and cholinergic local system during cold stress. J Endocrinol. 242:115–124. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

112 

Casillas F, Betancourt M, Juárez-Rojas L, Ducolomb Y, López A, Ávila-Quintero A, Zamora J, Ommati MM and Retana-Márquez S: Chronic stress detrimentally affects in vivo maturation in rat oocytes and oocyte viability at all phases of the estrous cycle. Animals (Basel). 11:24782021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

113 

Wang D, Cheng X, Fang H, Ren Y, Li X, Ren W, Xue B and Yang C: Effect of cold stress on ovarian & uterine microcirculation in rats and the role of endothelin system. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 18:292020. View Article : Google Scholar

114 

Retana-Márquez S, Juárez-Rojas L, Ávila-Quintero A, Rojas-Maya S, Perera G, Casillas F, Betancourt M and Gómez-Quiroz L: Neuroendocrine disruption is associated to infertility in chronically stressed female rats. Reprod Biol. 20:474–483. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

115 

Keremu A, Yaoliwasi A, Tuerhong M, Kadeer N, Heyi, Yiming A and Yilike X: Research on the establishment of chronic stress-induced premature ovarian failure the rat model and effects of Chinese medicine Muniziqi treatment. Mol Reprod Dev. 86:175–186. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

116 

Ernsberger U, Deller T and Rohrer H: The sympathies of the body: Functional organization and neuronal differentiation in the peripheral sympathetic nervous system. Cell Tissue Res. 386:455–475. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

117 

Espinoza JA, Navarrete MI, Linares R, Chaparro-Ortega A, Ramírez DA, Rosas G, Vieyra E, Domínguez R and Morales-Ledesma L: Effects of chronic exposure to cold stress on ovarian functions in prepubertal rats. Reprod Biol. 23:1007562023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

118 

Divyashree S and Yajurvedi HN: Long-term chronic stress exposure induces PCO phenotype in rat. Reproduction. 152:765–774. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

119 

Bunsueb S, Lapyuneyong N, Tongpan S, Arun S and Iamsaard S: Chronic stress increases the tyrosine phosphorylation in female reproductive organs: An experimental study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 19:87–96. 2021.PubMed/NCBI

120 

Kim J and You S: High housing density-induced chronic stress diminishes ovarian reserve via granulosa cell apoptosis by angiotensin II overexpression in mice. Int J Mol Sci. 23:86142022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

121 

Xi W, Mao H, Cui Z, Yao H, Shi R and Gao Y: Scream sound-induced chronic psychological stress results in diminished ovarian reserve in adult female rat. Endocrinology. 163:bqac0422022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

122 

Ghatebi M, Zavareh S, Lashkarbolouki T and Elahdadi Salmani M: Implications from early life stress on the development of mouse ovarian follicles: Focus on oxidative stress. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 45:1506–1514. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

123 

Yuan J, Yu Y, Liu D and Sun Y: Associations between distinct dimensions of early life adversity and accelerated reproductive strategy among middle-aged women in China. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 226:104.e1–104.e14. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

124 

Mishra GD, Cooper R, Tom SE and Kuh D: Early life circumstances and their impact on menarche and menopause. Womens Health (Lond). 5:175–190. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

125 

Wang N, Huang Y, Wen J, Su Q, Huang Y, Cai L, Lin W, Zong L, Huang H, Qian X, et al: Early life exposure to famine and reproductive aging among Chinese women. Menopause. 26:463–468. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

126 

Liu YX, Cheng YN, Miao YL, Wei DL, Zhao LH, Luo MJ and Tan JH: Psychological stress on female mice diminishes the developmental potential of oocytes: A study using the predatory stress model. PLoS One. 7:e480832012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

127 

Onalan E, Erbay B, Buran İK, Erol D, Tektemur A, Kuloglu T and Ozercan IH: Effects and mechanism of AP39 on ovarian functions in rats exposed to cisplatin and chronic immobilization stress. J Menopausal Med. 30:104–119. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

128 

Yuan HJ, Li ZB, Zhao XY, Sun GY, Wang GL, Zhao YQ, Zhang M and Tan JH: Glucocorticoids impair oocyte competence and trigger apoptosis of ovarian cells via activating the TNF-α system. Reproduction. 160:129–140. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

129 

Becker M, Pinhasov A and Ornoy A: Animal models of depression: What can they teach Us about the human disease? Diagnostics (Basel). 11:1232021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

130 

Kendler KS: The genealogy of major depression: Symptoms and signs of melancholia from 1880 to 1900. Mol Psychiatry. 22:1539–1553. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

131 

Liu MY, Yin CY, Zhu LJ, Zhu XH, Xu C, Luo CX, Chen H, Zhu DY and Zhou QG: Sucrose preference test for measurement of stress-induced anhedonia in mice. Nat Protoc. 13:1686–1698. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

132 

Primo MJ, Fonseca-Rodrigues D, Almeida A, Teixeira PM and Pinto-Ribeiro F: Sucrose preference test: A systematic review of protocols for the assessment of anhedonia in rodents. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 77:80–92. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

133 

Verharen JPH, de Jong JW, Zhu Y and Lammel S: A computational analysis of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test. Nat Commun. 14:24192023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

134 

Porsolt RD, Le Pichon M and Jalfre M: Depression: A new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature. 266:730–732. 1977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

135 

Cryan JF, Mombereau C and Vassout A: The tail suspension test as a model for assessing antidepressant activity: Review of pharmacological and genetic studies in mice. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 29:571–625. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

136 

Prut L and Belzung C: The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: A review. Eur J Pharmacol. 463:3–33. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

137 

Kraeuter AK, Guest PC and Sarnyai Z: The open field test for measuring locomotor activity and anxiety-like behavior. Methods Mol Biol. 1916:99–103. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

138 

Seibenhener ML and Wooten MC: Use of the open field maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. J Vis Exp. e524342015.PubMed/NCBI

139 

Bourin M and Hascoët M: The mouse light/dark box test. Eur J Pharmacol. 463:55–65. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

140 

Walf AA and Frye CA: The use of the elevated plus maze as an assay of anxiety-related behavior in rodents. Nat Protoc. 2:322–328. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

141 

Kraeuter AK, Guest PC and Sarnyai Z: The elevated plus maze test for measuring anxiety-like behavior in rodents. Methods Mol Biol. 1916:69–74. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

142 

Schrader AJ, Taylor RM, Lowery-Gionta EG and Moore NLT: Repeated elevated plus maze trials as a measure for tracking within-subjects behavioral performance in rats (Rattus norvegicus). PLoS One. 13:e02078042018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

143 

Pietropaolo S: Mood and anxiety-related phenotypes in mice: Characterization using behavioral tests-Edited by T. D. Gould. Genes Brain Behav. 9:544. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

144 

Bae J, Lynch CD, Kim S, Sundaram R, Sapra KJ and Buck Louis GM: Preconception stress and the secondary sex ratio in a population-based preconception cohort. Fertil Steril. 107:714–722. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

145 

Ulrich-Lai YM and Herman JP: Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 10:397–409. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

146 

Jacobson L: Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis regulation. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 34:271–292. vii2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

147 

McCall JG, Al-Hasani R, Siuda ER, Hong DY, Norris AJ, Ford CP and Bruchas MR: CRH engagement of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system mediates stress-induced anxiety. Neuron. 87:605–620. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

148 

Agorastos A and Chrousos GP: The neuroendocrinology of stress: The stress-related continuum of chronic disease development. Mol Psychiatry. 27:502–513. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

149 

Yoo ES, Yu J and Sohn JW: Neuroendocrine control of appetite and metabolism. Exp Mol Med. 53:505–516. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

150 

Di Comite G, Grazia Sabbadini M, Corti A, Rovere-Querini P and Manfredi AA: Conversation galante: How the immune and the neuroendocrine systems talk to each other. Autoimmun Rev. 7:23–29. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

151 

Smeenk JMJ, Verhaak CM, Vingerhoets AJJM, Sweep CGJ, Merkus JMWM, Willemsen SJ, van Minnen A, Straatman H and Braat DD: Stress and outcome success in IVF: The role of self-reports and endocrine variables. Hum Reprod. 20:991–996. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

152 

Hjollund NHI, Jensen TK, Bonde JP, Henriksen TB, Andersson AM, Kolstad HA, Ernst E, Giwercman A, Skakkebaek NE and Olsen J: Distress and reduced fertility: A follow-up study of first-pregnancy planners. Fertil Steril. 72:47–53. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

153 

Ates S, Yesil G, Sevket O, Molla T and Yildiz S: Comparison of metabolic profile and abdominal fat distribution between karyotypically normal women with premature ovarian insufficiency and age matched controls. Maturitas. 79:306–310. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

154 

Huang Y, Lv Y, Qi T, Luo Z, Meng X, Ying Q, Li D, Li C, Lan Y, Chu K, et al: Metabolic profile of women with premature ovarian insufficiency compared with that of age-matched healthy controls. Maturitas. 148:33–39. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

155 

Ferin M: Clinical review 105: Stress and the reproductive cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 84:1768–1774. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

156 

Chrousos GP, Torpy DJ and Gold PW: Interactions between the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the female reproductive system: Clinical implications. Ann Intern Med. 129:229–240. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

157 

Harlow CR, Fahy UM, Talbot WM, Wardle PG and Hull MG: Stress and stress-related hormones during in-vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod. 11:274–279. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

158 

Demyttenaere K, Nijs P, Evers-Kiebooms G and Koninckx PR: Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 17:655–665. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

159 

Pal L, Bevilacqua K and Santoro NF: Chronic psychosocial stressors are detrimental to ovarian reserve: A study of infertile women. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 31:130–139. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

160 

Andersen CY: Effect of glucocorticoids on spontaneous and follicle-stimulating hormone induced oocyte maturation in mouse oocytes during culture. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 85:423–427. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

161 

Yuan HJ, Han X, He N, Wang GL, Gong S, Lin J, Gao M and Tan JH: Glucocorticoids impair oocyte developmental potential by triggering apoptosis of ovarian cells via activating the Fas system. Sci Rep. 6:240362016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

162 

Kalantaridou SN, Zoumakis E, Makrigiannakis A, Lavasidis LG, Vrekoussis T and Chrousos GP: Corticotropin-releasing hormone, stress and human reproduction: An update. J Reprod Immunol. 85:33–39. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

163 

Rivier C and Vale W: Influence of corticotropin-releasing factor on reproductive functions in the rat. Endocrinology. 114:914–921. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

164 

Breen KM, Thackray VG, Hsu T, Mak-McCully RA, Coss D and Mellon PL: Stress levels of glucocorticoids inhibit LHβ-subunit gene expression in gonadotrope cells. Mol Endocrinol. 26:1716–1731. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

165 

Luo E, Stephens SBZ, Chaing S, Munaganuru N, Kauffman AS and Breen KM: Corticosterone blocks ovarian cyclicity and the LH surge via decreased kisspeptin neuron activation in female mice. Endocrinology. 157:1187–1199. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar :

166 

Roozendaal MM, Swarts JJM, Van Maanen JC, Wiegant VM and Mattheij JA: Inhibition of the LH surge in cyclic rats by stress is not mediated by opioids. Life Sci. 60:735–742. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

167 

Horowitz MA and Zunszain PA: Neuroimmune and neuroendocrine abnormalities in depression: Two sides of the same coin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1351:68–79. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

168 

Berga SL, Daniels TL and Giles DE: Women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea but not other forms of anovulation display amplified cortisol concentrations. Fertil Steril. 67:1024–1030. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

169 

Deady LD and Sun J: A follicle rupture assay reveals an essential role for follicular adrenergic signaling in drosophila ovulation. PLoS Genet. 11:e10056042015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

170 

Aguado LI: Role of the central and peripheral nervous system in the ovarian function. Microsc Res Tech. 59:462–473. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

171 

Lara HE, Dorfman M, Venegas M, Luza SM, Luna SL, Mayerhofer A, Guimaraes MA, Rosa E Silva AA and Ramírez VD: Changes in sympathetic nerve activity of the mammalian ovary during a normal estrous cycle and in polycystic ovary syndrome: Studies on norepinephrine release. Microsc Res Tech. 59:495–502. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

172 

Morales-Ledesma L, Linares R, Rosas G, Morán C, Chavira R, Cárdenas M and Domínguez R: Unilateral sectioning of the superior ovarian nerve of rats with polycystic ovarian syndrome restores ovulation in the innervated ovary. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 8:992010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

173 

Dissen GA, Romero C, Paredes A and Ojeda SR: Neurotrophic control of ovarian development. Microsc Res Tech. 59:509–515. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

174 

Uchida S and Kagitani F: Autonomic nervous regulation of ovarian function by noxious somatic afferent stimulation. J Physiol Sci. 65:1–9. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

175 

Acuña E, Fornes R, Fernandois D, Garrido MP, Greiner M, Lara HE and Paredes AH: Increases in norepinephrine release and ovarian cyst formation during ageing in the rat. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 7:642009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

176 

Casillas F, Flores-González A, Juárez-Rojas L, López A, Betancourt M, Casas E, Bahena I, Bonilla E and Retana-Márquez S: Chronic stress decreases fertility parameters in female rats. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 69:234–244. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

177 

Fernandois D, Cruz G, Na EK, Lara HE and Paredes AH: Kisspeptin level in the aging ovary is regulated by the sympathetic nervous system. J Endocrinol. 232:97–105. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

178 

Saller S, Merz-Lange J, Raffael S, Hecht S, Pavlik R, Thaler C, Berg D, Berg U, Kunz L and Mayerhofer A: Norepinephrine, active norepinephrine transporter, and norepinephrine-metabolism are involved in the generation of reactive oxygen species in human ovarian granulosa cells. Endocrinology. 153:1472–1483. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

179 

Zhang L, Gao J and Cui S: miR-21 is involved in norepinephrine-mediated rat granulosa cell apoptosis by targeting SMAD7. J Mol Endocrinol. 58:199–210. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

180 

Li XH, Ma YG, Geng LH, Qin L, Hu H and Li SW: Baseline psychological stress and ovarian norepinephrine levels negatively affect the outcome of in vitro fertilisation. Gynecol Endocrinol. 27:139–143. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

181 

Lynch CD, Sundaram R, Maisog JM, Sweeney AM and Louis GMB: Preconception stress increases the risk of infertility: Results from a couple-based prospective cohort study-the LIFE study. Hum Reprod. 29:1067–1075. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

182 

Hackett RA and Steptoe A: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and psychological stress-a modifiable risk factor. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 13:547–560. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

183 

Afrisham R, Paknejad M, Soliemanifar O, Sadegh-Nejadi S, Meshkani R and Ashtary-Larky D: The influence of psychological stress on the initiation and progression of diabetes and cancer. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 17:e674002019.

184 

Joseph JJ and Golden SH: Cortisol dysregulation: The bidirectional link between stress, depression, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1391:20–34. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar :

185 

Balkan F, Cetin N, Usluogullari CA, Unal OK and Usluogullari B: Evaluation of the ovarian reserve function in patients with metabolic syndrome in relation to healthy controls and different age groups. J Ovarian Res. 7:632014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

186 

Isik S, Ozcan HN, Ozuguz U, Tutuncu YA, Berker D, Alimli AG, Akbaba G, Karademir MA and Guler S: Evaluation of ovarian reserve based on hormonal parameters, ovarian volume, and antral follicle count in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 97:261–269. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

187 

Lustman PJ, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, De Groot M, Carney RM and Clouse RE: Depression and poor glycemic control: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Diabetes Care. 23:934–942. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

188 

Yaribeygi H, Sathyapalan T, Atkin SL and Sahebkar A: Molecular mechanisms linking oxidative stress and diabetes mellitus. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020:86092132020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

189 

Grigsby AB, Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE and Lustman PJ: Prevalence of anxiety in adults with diabetes: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 53:1053–1060. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

190 

Razzoli M, Pearson C, Crow S and Bartolomucci A: Stress, overeating, and obesity: Insights from human studies and preclinical models. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 76:154–162. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

191 

Codner E, Merino PM and Tena-Sempere M: Female reproduction and type 1 diabetes: From mechanisms to clinical findings. Hum Reprod Update. 18:568–585. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

192 

Nandi A and Poretsky L: Diabetes and the female reproductive system. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 42:915–946. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

193 

Dri M, Klinger FG and De Felici M: The ovarian reserve as target of insulin/IGF and ROS in metabolic disorder-dependent ovarian dysfunctions. Reprod Fertil. 2:R103–R112. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

194 

Barbieri RL, Makris A and Ryan KJ: Effects of insulin on steroidogenesis in cultured porcine ovarian theca. Fertil Steril. 40:237–241. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

195 

Barbieri RL, Makris A, Randall RW, Daniels G, Kistner RW and Ryan KJ: Insulin stimulates androgen accumulation in incubations of ovarian stroma obtained from women with hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 62:904–910. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

196 

Cara JF and Rosenfield RL: Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin potentiate luteinizing hormone-induced androgen synthesis by rat ovarian thecal-interstitial cells. Endocrinology. 123:733–739. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

197 

Hudish LI, Reusch JE and Sussel L: β Cell dysfunction during progression of metabolic syndrome to type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest. 129:4001–4008. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

198 

Escobar-Morreale HF, Roldán B, Barrio R, Alonso M, Sancho J, De La Calle H and García-Robles R: High prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome and hirsutism in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 85:4182–4187. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

199 

Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Piperi C, Patsouris E, Korkolopoulou P, Panidis D, Pawelczyk L, Papavassiliou AG and Duleba AJ: Immunohistochemical localization of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and their receptor (RAGE) in polycystic and normal ovaries. Histochem Cell Biol. 127:581–589. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

200 

Secomandi L, Borghesan M, Velarde M and Demaria M: The role of cellular senescence in female reproductive aging and the potential for senotherapeutic interventions. Hum Reprod Update. 28:172–189. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar :

201 

Willis DS, Watson H, Mason HD, Galea R, Brincat M and Franks S: Premature response to luteinizing hormone of granulosa cells from anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome: Relevance to mechanism of anovulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:3984–3991. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

202 

Lee J, Lee HC, Kim SY, Cho GJ and Woodruff TK: Poorly-controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus impairs LH-LHCGR signaling in the ovaries and decreases female fertility in mice. Yonsei Med J. 60:667–678. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

203 

Zargar AH, Gupta VK, Wani AI, Masoodi SR, Bashir MI, Laway BA, Ganie MA and Salahuddin M: Prevalence of ultrasonography proved polycystic ovaries in North Indian women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 3:352005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

204 

Peppard HR, Marfori J, Iuorno MJ and Nestler JE: Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome among premenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 24:1050–1052. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

205 

Khalil N, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Strotmeyer ES, Greendale GA, Vuga M, Selzer F, Crandall CJ and Cauley JA: Menopausal bone changes and incident fractures in diabetic women: A cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 22:1367–1376. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

206 

Sekhar TVDS, Medarametla S, Rahman A and Adapa SS: Early menopause in type 2 diabetes-A study from a South Indian tertiary care centre. J Clin Diagn Res. 9:OC08–OC10. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

207 

Qin X, Du J, He R, Li Y, Zhu Q, Li Y, Li H and Liang X: Adverse effects of type 2 diabetes mellitus on ovarian reserve and pregnancy outcomes during the assisted reproductive technology process. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 14:12743272023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

208 

Carr MC: The emergence of the metabolic syndrome with menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 88:2404–2411. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

209 

Kanaya AM, Herrington D, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Grady D, Bittner V, Cauley JA and Barrett-Connor E; Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study: Glycemic effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy: The heart and estrogen/progestin replacement study. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 138:1–9. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

210 

Margolis KL, Bonds DE, Rodabough RJ, Tinker L, Phillips LS, Allen C, Bassford T, Burke G, Torrens J and Howard BV; Women's Health Initiative Investigators: Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: Results from the women's health initiative hormone trial. Diabetologia. 47:1175–1187. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

211 

Wagner JD, Thomas MJ, Williams JK, Zhang L, Greaves KA and Cefalu WT: Insulin sensitivity and cardiovascular risk factors in ovariectomized monkeys with estradiol alone or combined with nomegestrol acetate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 83:896–901. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

212 

Kumagai S, Holmäng A and Björntorp P: The effects of oestrogen and progesterone on insulin sensitivity in female rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 149:91–97. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

213 

Cantave CY, Ruttle PL, Coté SM, Lupien SJ, Geoffroy MC, Vitaro F, Brendgen M, Tremblay R, Boivin M and Ouellet-Morin I: Body mass index across development and adolescent hair cortisol: The role of persistence, variability, and timing of exposure. Int J Obes (Lond). Oct 4–2024.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

214 

Christakoudi S, Asimakopoulos AG, Riboli E and Tsilidis KK: Links between the genetic determinants of morning plasma cortisol and body shape: A two-sample Mendelian randomisation study. Sci Rep. 14:32302024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

215 

Kühnel A, Hagenberg J, Knauer-Arloth J, Ködel M, Czisch M, Sämann PG; BeCOME working group; Binder EB and Kroemer NB: Stress-induced brain responses are associated with BMI in women. Commun Biol. 6:10312023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

216 

Lin YC, Lin CY, Saffari M, Tsai MC, Chang YH, Strong C, Chen JK, Hsieh YP, Yang YN and Latner JD: Weight stigma is associated with body mass index among college students in Taiwan: The mediated role of internalized weight stigma. BMC Psychol. 11:3652023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

217 

Fardet L and Fève B: Systemic glucocorticoid therapy: A review of its metabolic and cardiovascular adverse events. Drugs. 74:1731–1745. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

218 

Santosa A, Rosengren A, Ramasundarahettige C, Rangarajan S, Gulec S, Chifamba J, Lear SA, Poirier P, Yeates KE, Yusuf R, et al: Psychosocial risk factors and cardiovascular disease and death in a population-based cohort from 21 low-, middle-, and high-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. 4:e21389202021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

219 

Ponti F, Santoro A, Mercatelli D, Gasperini C, Conte M, Martucci M, Sangiorgi L, Franceschi C and Bazzocchi A: Aging and imaging assessment of body composition: From fat to facts. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 10:8612020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

220 

Van Der Valk ES, Savas M and Van Rossum EFC: Stress and obesity: Are there more susceptible individuals? Curr Obes Rep. 7:193–203. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

221 

Chen X, Xiao Z, Cai Y, Huang L and Chen C: Hypothalamic mechanisms of obesity-associated disturbance of hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 33:206–217. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

222 

Morimoto A, Rose RD, Smith KM, Dinh DT, Umehara T, Winstanley YE, Shibahara H, Russell DL and Robker RL: Granulosa cell metabolism at ovulation correlates with oocyte competence and is disrupted by obesity and aging. Hum Reprod. 39:2053–2066. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

223 

Schon SB, Cabre HE and Redman LM: The impact of obesity on reproductive health and metabolism in reproductive-age females. Fertil Steril. 122:194–203. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

224 

Martinuzzi K, Ryan S, Luna M and Copperman AB: Elevated body mass index (BMI) does not adversely affect in vitro fertilization outcome in young women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 25:169–175. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

225 

Bernardi LA, Carnethon MR, de Chavez PJ, Ikhena DE, Neff LM, Baird DD and Marsh EE: Relationship between obesity and anti-Müllerian hormone in reproductive-aged African American women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 25:229–235. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

226 

Moy V, Jindal S, Lieman H and Buyuk E: Obesity adversely affects serum anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in Caucasian women. J Assist Reprod Genet. 32:1305–1311. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

227 

Freeman EW, Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Lin H, Lim LCL and Strauss JF III: Association of anti-mullerian hormone levels with obesity in late reproductive-age women. Fertil Steril. 87:101–106. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

228 

Wang Y, Wu L, Yang Z, Xu R, Duan Y, Lin J, Cui X, Fan C, Zhou Y, Bao W, et al: Association of body mass index with serum anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B levels among 8323 women attending a reproductive medical center: A cross-sectional study. Endocrine. 75:284–292. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

229 

Douchi T, Kuwahata R, Yamamoto S, Oki T, Yamasaki H and Nagata Y: Relationship of upper body obesity to menstrual disorders. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 81:147–150. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

230 

Rittmaster RS, Deshwal N and Lehman L: The role of adrenal hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, and obesity in the pathogenesis of polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:1295–1300. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

231 

Di Berardino C, Peserico A, Capacchietti G, Zappacosta A, Bernabò N, Russo V, Mauro A, El Khatib M, Gonnella F, Konstantinidou F, et al: High-fat diet and female fertility across lifespan: A comparative lesson from mammal models. Nutrients. 14:43412022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

232 

Wang N, Luo LL, Xu JJ, Xu MY, Zhang XM, Zhou XL, Liu WJ and Fu YC: Obesity accelerates ovarian follicle development and follicle loss in rats. Metabolism. 63:94–103. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

233 

Jungheim ES, Schoeller EL, Marquard KL, Louden ED, Schaffer JE and Moley KH: Diet-induced obesity model: Abnormal oocytes and persistent growth abnormalities in the offspring. Endocrinology. 151:4039–4046. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

234 

Luzzo KM, Wang Q, Purcell SH, Chi M, Jimenez PT, Grindler N, Schedl T and Moley KH: High fat diet induced developmental defects in the mouse: Oocyte meiotic aneuploidy and fetal growth retardation/brain defects. PLoS One. 7:e492172012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

235 

Reynolds KA, Boudoures AL, Chi MMY, Wang Q and Moley KH: Adverse effects of obesity and/or high-fat diet on oocyte quality and metabolism are not reversible with resumption of regular diet in mice. Reprod Fertil Dev. 27:716–724. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

236 

Machtinger R, Combelles CMH, Missmer SA, Correia KF, Fox JH and Racowsky C: The association between severe obesity and characteristics of failed fertilized oocytes. Hum Reprod. 27:3198–3207. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

237 

Kloos J, Perez J and Weinerman R: Increased body mass index is negatively associated with ovarian reserve as measured by anti-Müllerian hormone in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Clin Obes. 29:e126382024. View Article : Google Scholar

238 

Beroukhim G, Esencan E and Seifer DB: Impact of sleep patterns upon female neuroendocrinology and reproductive outcomes: A comprehensive review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 20:162022. View Article : Google Scholar

239 

Yan J, Zhang X, Zhu K, Yu M, Liu Q, De Felici M, Zhang T, Wang J and Shen W: Sleep deprivation causes gut dysbiosis impacting on systemic metabolomics leading to premature ovarian insufficiency in adolescent mice. Theranostics. 14:3760–3776. 2024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

240 

Weng L, Hong H, Zhang Q, Xiao C, Zhang Q, Wang Q, Huang J and Lai D: Sleep deprivation triggers the excessive activation of ovarian primordial follicles via β2 adrenergic receptor signaling. Adv Sci (Weinh). 11:e24023932024. View Article : Google Scholar

241 

Andersen ML, Alvarenga TAF, Guindalini C, Perry JC, Silva A, Zager A and Tufik S: Paradoxical sleep deprivation influences sexual behavior in female rats. J Sex Med. 6:2162–2172. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

242 

Koehl M, Battle S and Meerlo P: Sex differences in sleep: The response to sleep deprivation and restraint stress in mice. Sleep. 29:1224–1231. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

243 

Yang CK, Tsai HD, Wu CH and Cho CL: The role of glucocorticoids in ovarian development of sleep deprived rats. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 58:122–127. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

244 

Yang CK, Wu RSC, Wu CH, Lin TRY and Tsai HD: Sleep deprivation enhances peripheral serotonin secretion to regulate the large follicle steroidogenesis of rats. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 54:260–265. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

245 

Stock D, Knight JA, Raboud J, Cotterchio M, Strohmaier S, Willett W, Eliassen AH, Rosner B, Hankinson SE and Schernhammer E: Rotating night shift work and menopausal age. Hum Reprod. 34:539–548. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

246 

Reiter RJ, Mayo JC, Tan DX, Sainz RM, Alatorre-Jimenez M and Qin L: Melatonin as an antioxidant: Under promises but over delivers. J Pineal Res. 61:253–278. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

247 

Tamura H, Takasaki A, Taketani T, Tanabe M, Kizuka F, Lee L, Tamura I, Maekawa R, Asada H, Yamagata Y and Sugino N: Melatonin as a free radical scavenger in the ovarian follicle. Endocr J. 60:1–13. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

248 

Lahiri DK, Ge Y, Sharman EH and Bondy SC: Age-related changes in serum melatonin in mice: Higher levels of combined melatonin and 6-hydroxymelatonin sulfate in the cerebral cortex than serum, heart, liver and kidney tissues. J Pineal Res. 36:217–223. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

249 

Tanabe M, Tamura H, Taketani T, Okada M, Lee L, Tamura I, Maekawa R, Asada H, Yamagata Y and Sugino N: Melatonin protects the integrity of granulosa cells by reducing oxidative stress in nuclei, mitochondria, and plasma membranes in mice. J Reprod Dev. 61:35–41. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar :

250 

Shen M, Cao Y, Jiang Y, Wei Y and Liu H: Melatonin protects mouse granulosa cells against oxidative damage by inhibiting FOXO1-mediated autophagy: Implication of an antioxidation-independent mechanism. Redox Biol. 18:138–157. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

251 

Zhai B, Li X, Zhao Z, Cao Y, Liu X, Liu Z, Ma H and Lu W: Melatonin protects the apoptosis of sheep granulosa cells by suppressing oxidative stress via MAP3K8 and FOS pathway. Genes (Basel). 14:10672023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

252 

Xu G, Dong Y, Wang Z, Ding H, Wang J, Zhao J, Liu H and Lv W: Melatonin attenuates oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of bovine ovarian granulosa cells by promoting mitophagy via SIRT1/FoxO1 signaling pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 24:128542023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

253 

Tamura H, Takasaki A, Miwa I, Taniguchi K, Maekawa R, Asada H, Taketani T, Matsuoka A, Yamagata Y, Shimamura K, et al: Oxidative stress impairs oocyte quality and melatonin protects oocytes from free radical damage and improves fertilization rate. J Pineal Res. 44:280–287. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

254 

Zhang H, Li C, Wen D, Li R, Lu S, Xu R, Tang Y, Sun Y, Zhao X, Pan M and Ma B: Melatonin improves the quality of maternally aged oocytes by maintaining intercellular communication and antioxidant metabolite supply. Redox Biol. 49:1022152022. View Article : Google Scholar

255 

Lord T, Nixon B, Jones KT and Aitken RJ: Melatonin prevents postovulatory oocyte aging in the mouse and extends the window for optimal fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod. 88:672013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

256 

Zhang M, Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhang Y and Xiong B: Insufficiency of melatonin in follicular fluid is a reversible cause for advanced maternal age-related aneuploidy in oocytes. Redox Biol. 28:1013272020. View Article : Google Scholar

257 

Yang D, Mu Y, Wang J, Zou W, Zou H, Yang H, Zhang C, Fan Y, Zhang H, Zhang H, et al: Melatonin enhances the developmental potential of immature oocytes from older reproductive-aged women by improving mitochondrial function. Heliyon. 9:e193662023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

258 

Li C, He X, Huang Z, Han L, Wu X, Li L, Xin Y, Ge J, Sha J, Yin Z and Wang Q: Melatonin ameliorates the advanced maternal age-associated meiotic defects in oocytes through the SIRT2-dependent H4K16 deacetylation pathway. Aging (Albany NY). 12:1610–1623. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

259 

Takasaki A, Nakamura Y, Tamura H, Shimamura K and Morioka H: Melatonin as a new drug for improving oocyte quality. Reprod Med Biol. 2:139–144. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

260 

Baden MY, Hu FB, Vetter C, Schernhammer E, Redline S and Huang T: Sleep duration patterns in early to middle adulthood and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care. 43:1219–1226. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

261 

Rooney KL and Domar AD: The impact of stress on fertility treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 28:198–201. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

262 

Ramezanzadeh F, Noorbala AA, Abedinia N, Rahimi Forooshani A and Naghizadeh MM: Psychiatric intervention improved pregnancy rates in infertile couples. Malays J Med Sci. 18:16–24. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

263 

Rock J, Tietze C and McLaughlin HB: Effect of adoption on infertility. Fertil Steril. 16:305–312. 1965. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

264 

Weir WC and Weir DR: Adoption and subsequent conceptions. Fertil Steril. 17:283–288. 1966. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

265 

Nakao M, Shirotsuki K and Sugaya N: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for management of mental health and stress-related disorders: Recent advances in techniques and technologies. Biopsychosoc Med. 15:162021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

266 

Hoffman SG and Smits JAJ: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychiatry. 69:621–632. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

267 

Powers MB, Halpern JM, Ferenschak MP, Gillihan SJ and Foa EB: A meta-analytic review of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Psychol Rev. 30:635–641. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

268 

Olatunji BO, Davis ML, Powers MB and Smits JAJ: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta-analysis of treatment outcome and moderators. J Psychiatr Res. 47:33–41. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

269 

Cuijpers P, Berking M, Andersson G, Quigley L, Kleiboer A and Dobson KS: A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Can J Psychiatry. 58:376–385. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

270 

Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJJ, Sawyer AT and Fang A: The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res. 36:427–440. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

271 

Golshani F, Hasanpour S, Mirghafourvand M and Esmaeilpour K: Effect of cognitive behavioral therapy-based counseling on perceived stress in pregnant women with history of primary infertility: A controlled randomized clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry. 21:2782021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

272 

Domar AD, Rooney KL, Wiegand B, Orav EJ, Alper MM, Berger BM and Nikolovski J: Impact of a group mind/body intervention on pregnancy rates in IVF patients. Fertil Steril. 95:2269–2273. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

273 

Faramarzi M, Pasha H, Esmailzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Heidary S and Afshar Z: The effect of the cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 7:199–206. 2013.

274 

Sexton MB, Byrd MR, O'Donohue WT and Jacobs NN: Web-based treatment for infertility-related psychological distress. Arch Womens Ment Health. 13:347–358. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

275 

John JB, Chellaiyan DVG, Gupta S and Nithyanandham R: How effective the mindfulness-based cognitive behavioral therapy on quality of life in women with menopause. J Midlife Health. 13:169–174. 2022.PubMed/NCBI

276 

Green SM and Furtado M: Cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual concerns during perimenopause: A four session study protocol. Front Glob Womens Health. 2:7447482021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

277 

Green SM, Donegan E, Frey BN, Fedorkow DM, Key BL, Streiner DL and McCabe RE: Cognitive behavior therapy for menopausal symptoms (CBT-Meno): A randomized controlled trial. Menopause. 26:972–980. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

278 

Green SM, Haber E, McCabe RE and Soares CN: Cognitive-behavioral group treatment for menopausal symptoms: A pilot study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 16:325–332. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

279 

Reddy NV and Omkarappa DB: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression among menopausal woman: A randomized controlled trial. J Fam Med Prim Care. 8:1002–1006. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

280 

Donegan E, Frey BN, McCabe RE, Streiner DL, Fedorkow DM, Furtado M and Green SM: Impact of the CBT-Meno protocol on menopause-specific beliefs, dysfunctional attitudes, and coping behaviors. Menopause. 29:963–972. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

281 

Shabani F, Farvareshi M, Hamdi K, Sadeghzadeh Oskouei B, Montazeri M and Mirghafourvand M: The effect of cognitive-behavioral therapy on stress and anxiety of women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A randomized controlled trial. Post Reprod Health. 28:211–221. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

282 

Berga SL, Marcus MD, Loucks TL, Hlastala S, Ringham R and Krohn MA: Recovery of ovarian activity in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea who were treated with cognitive behavior therapy. Fertil Steril. 80:976–981. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

283 

Michopoulos V, Mancini F, Loucks TL and Berga SL: Neuroendocrine recovery initiated by cognitive behavioral therapy in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea: A randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 99:2084–2091.e1. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

284 

Sockalingam S, Leung SE, Ma C, Tomlinson G, Hawa R, Wnuk S, Jackson T, Urbach D, Okrainec A, Brown J, et al: Efficacy of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy for weight loss, disordered eating, and psychological distress after bariatric surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 6:e23270992023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

285 

Rofey DL, Szigethy EM, Noll RB, Dahl RE, Lobst E and Arslanian SA: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for physical and emotional disturbances in adolescents with polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot study. J Pediatr Psychol. 34:156–163. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

286 

Cooney LG, Milman LW, Hantsoo L, Kornfield S, Sammel MD, Allison KC, Epperson CN and Dokras A: Cognitive-behavioral therapy improves weight loss and quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A pilot randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 110:161–171.e1. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

287 

Ludwig DS and Kabat-Zinn J: Mindfulness in medicine. JAMA. 300:1350–1352. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

288 

Grossman P, Niemann L, Schmidt S and Walach H: Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 57:35–43. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

289 

Rosenzweig S, Greeson JM, Reibel DK, Green JS, Jasser SA and Beasley D: Mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain conditions: Variation in treatment outcomes and role of home meditation practice. J Psychosom Res. 68:29–36. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

290 

Wong C, Yip BHK, Gao T, Lam KYY, Woo DMS, Yip ALK, Chin CY, Tang WPY, Choy MMT, Tsang KWK, et al: Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or psychoeducation for the reduction of menopausal symptoms: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Sci Rep. 8:66092018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

291 

Pyri F, Abedi P, Maraghi E and Jefreh M: The effect of mindfulness on quality of life among women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A randomized clinical trial. J Midlife Health. 12:116–121. 2021.PubMed/NCBI

292 

Majeed MH, Ali AA and Sudak DM: Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: Evidence and applications. Asian J Psychiatry. 32:79–83. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

293 

Kalhori F, Masoumi SZ, Shamsaei F, Mohammadi Y and Yavangi M: Effect of mindfulness-based group counseling on depression in infertile women: Randomized clinical trial study. Int J Fertil Steril. 14:10–6. 2020.PubMed/NCBI

294 

Galhardo A, Cunha M and Pinto-Gouveia J: A 7-year follow-up study of the mindfulness-based program for infertility: Are there long-term effects? Clin Psychol Psychother. 26:409–417. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

295 

Aalbers S, Fusar-Poli L, Freeman RE, Spreen M, Ket JC, Vink AC, Maratos A, Crawford M, Chen XJ and Gold C: Music therapy for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 11:CD0045172017.PubMed/NCBI

296 

Koçak DY and Varişoğlu Y: The effect of music therapy on menopausal symptoms and depression: A randomized-controlled study. Menopause. 29:545–552. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

297 

Kim S, Kim SM, Hwang H, Kim MK, Kim HJ, Park S and Han DH: The effects of music therapy on the psychological status of women with perimenopause syndrome. Menopause. 30:1045–1052. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

298 

Mahmoud MY, Labib K, Sileem SA, Mustafa FA, Hamed WM, Abd Elhamid A, Saleh DM, Alanwar A, Riad AAM, Abdelhakim AM, et al: The impact of music therapy on anxiety and pregnancy rate among infertile women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 43:205–213. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar

299 

Aba YA, Avci D, Guzel Y, Ozcelik SK and Gurtekin B: Effect of music therapy on the anxiety levels and pregnancy rate of women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: A randomized controlled trial. Appl Nurs Res. 36:19–24. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

300 

Domar AD, Gross J, Rooney K and Boivin J: Exploratory randomized trial on the effect of a brief psychological intervention on emotions, quality of life, discontinuation, and pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril. 104:440–451.e7. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

301 

Clifton J, Parent J, Seehuus M, Worrall G, Forehand R and Domar A: An internet-based mind/body intervention to mitigate distress in women experiencing infertility: A randomized pilot trial. PLoS One. 15:e02293792020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

302 

Brinsley J, Schuch F, Lederman O, Girard D, Smout M, Immink MA, Stubbs B, Firth J, Davison K and Rosenbaum S: Effects of yoga on depressive symptoms in people with mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 55:992–1000. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

303 

Darbandi S, Darbandi M, Khorram Khorshid HR and Sadeghi MR: Yoga can improve assisted reproduction technology outcomes in couples with infertility. Altern Ther Health Med. 24:50–55. 2018.

304 

Oron G, Allnutt E, Lackman T, Sokal-Arnon T, Holzer H and Takefman J: A prospective study using hatha yoga for stress reduction among women waiting for IVF treatment. Reprod Biomed Online. 30:542–548. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

305 

Valoriani V, Lotti F, Vanni C, Noci MC, Fontanarosa N, Ferrari G, Cozzi C and Noci I: Hatha-yoga as a psychological adjuvant for women undergoing IVF: A pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 176:158–162. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

306 

Lu X, Liu L and Yuan R: Effect of the information support method combined with yoga exercise on the depression, anxiety, and sleep quality of menopausal women. Psychiatr Danub. 32:380–388. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

307 

Jorge MP, Santaella DF, Pontes IMO, Shiramizu VKM, Nascimento EB, Cabral A, Lemos TM, Silva RH and Ribeiro AM: Hatha yoga practice decreases menopause symptoms and improves quality of life: A randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 26:128–135. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

308 

Frederiksen Y, O'Toole MS, Mehlsen MY, Hauge B, Elbaek HO, Zachariae R and Ingerslev HJ: The effect of expressive writing intervention for infertile couples: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 32:391–402. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar

309 

Hart RJ: Physiological aspects of female fertility: Role of the environment, modern lifestyle, and genetics. Physiol Rev. 96:873–909. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

310 

Waldman M, Cohen K, Yadin D, Nudelman V, Gorfil D, Laniado-Schwartzman M, Kornwoski R, Aravot D, Abraham NG, Arad M and Hochhauser E: Regulation of diabetic cardiomyopathy by caloric restriction is mediated by intracellular signaling pathways involving 'SIRT1 and PGC-1α'. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 17:1112018. View Article : Google Scholar

311 

Bordone L and Guarente L: Calorie restriction, SIRT1 and metabolism: Understanding longevity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 6:298–305. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

312 

Levine B and Kroemer G: Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease. Cell. 132:27–42. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

313 

Selesniemi K, Lee HJ, Muhlhauser A and Tilly JL: Prevention of maternal aging-associated oocyte aneuploidy and meiotic spindle defects in mice by dietary and genetic strategies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:12319–12324. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

314 

Smits A, Marei WFA, Moorkens K, Bols PEJ, De Neubourg D and Leroy JLMR: Obese outbred mice only partially benefit from diet normalization or calorie restriction as preconception care interventions to improve metabolic health and oocyte quality. Hum Reprod. 37:2867–2884. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

315 

Mishina T, Tabata N, Hayashi T, Yoshimura M, Umeda M, Mori M, Ikawa Y, Hamada H, Nikaido I and Kitajima TS: Single-oocyte transcriptome analysis reveals aging-associated effects influenced by life stage and calorie restriction. Aging Cell. 20:e134282021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

316 

Słuczanowska-Głąbowska S, Laszczyńska M, Piotrowska K, Grabowska M, Grymuła K and Ratajczak MZ: Caloric restriction increases ratio of estrogen to androgen receptors expression in murine ovaries-potential therapeutic implications. J Ovarian Res. 8:572015. View Article : Google Scholar

317 

Sharov AA, Falco G, Piao Y, Poosala S, Becker KG, Zonderman AB, Longo DL, Schlessinger D and Ko MSh: Effects of aging and calorie restriction on the global gene expression profiles of mouse testis and ovary. BMC Biol. 6:242008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

318 

Garcia DN, Saccon TD, Pradiee J, Rincón JAA, Andrade KRS, Rovani MT, Mondadori RG, Cruz LAX, Barros CC, Masternak MM, et al: Effect of caloric restriction and rapamycin on ovarian aging in mice. Geroscience. 41:395–408. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

319 

Isola JVV, Zanini BM, Hense JD, Alvarado-Rincón JA, Garcia DN, Pereira GC, Vieira AD, Oliveira TL, Collares T, Gasperin BG, et al: Mild calorie restriction, but not 17α-estradiol, extends ovarian reserve and fertility in female mice. Exp Gerontol. 159:1116692022. View Article : Google Scholar

320 

Liu WJ, Zhang XM, Wang N, Zhou XL, Fu YC and Luo LL: Calorie restriction inhibits ovarian follicle development and follicle loss through activating SIRT1 signaling in mice. Eur J Med Res. 20:222015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

321 

Zhou XL, Xu JJ, Ni YH, Chen XC, Zhang HX, Zhang XM, Liu WJ, Luo LL and Fu YC: SIRT1 activator (SRT1720) improves the follicle reserve and prolongs the ovarian lifespan of diet-induced obesity in female mice via activating SIRT1 and suppressing mTOR signaling. J Ovarian Res. 7:972014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

322 

Li L, Fu YC, Xu JJ, Lin XH, Chen XC, Zhang XM and Luo LL: Caloric restriction promotes the reserve of follicle pool in adult female rats by inhibiting the activation of mammalian target of rapamycin signaling. Reprod Sci. 22:60–67. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar :

323 

Smits A, Marei WFA, De Neubourg D and Leroy JLMR: Diet normalization or caloric restriction as a preconception care strategy to improve metabolic health and oocyte quality in obese outbred mice. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 19:1662021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

324 

Chen G, Xie W, Nah J, Sauvat A, Liu P, Pietrocola F, Sica V, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Zimmermann A, Pendl T, et al: 3,4-Dimethoxychalcone induces autophagy through activation of the transcription factors TFE3 and TFEB. EMBO Mol Med. 11:e104692019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

325 

Kepp O, Chen G, Carmona-Gutierrez D, Madeo F and Kroemer G: A discovery platform for the identification of caloric restriction mimetics with broad health-improving effects. Autophagy. 16:188–189. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar :

326 

Zhang H, Ni W, Yu G, Geng Y, Lou J, Qi J, Chen Y, Li F, Ye H, Ma H, et al: 3,4-Dimethoxychalcone, a caloric restriction mimetic, enhances TFEB-mediated autophagy and alleviates pyroptosis and necroptosis after spinal cord injury. Theranostics. 13:810–832. 2023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

327 

Jafari M, Macho-González A, Diaz A, Lindenau K, Santiago-Fernández O, Zeng M, Massey AC, de Cabo R, Kaushik S and Cuervo AM: Calorie restriction and calorie-restriction mimetics activate chaperone-mediated autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 121:e23179451212024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

328 

Sciarretta S, Forte M, Castoldi F, Frati G, Versaci F, Sadoshima J, Kroemer G and Maiuri MC: Caloric restriction mimetics for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res. 117:1434–1449. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar

329 

Pallauf K, Günther I, Kühn G, Chin D, de Pascual-Teresa S and Rimbach G: The potential of resveratrol to act as a caloric restriction mimetic appears to be limited: Insights from studies in mice. Adv Nutr. 12:995–1005. 2021. View Article : Google Scholar :

330 

Pernicova I and Korbonits M: Metformin-mode of action and clinical implications for diabetes and cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 10:143–156. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

331 

Viollet B, Guigas B, Garcia NS, Leclerc J, Foretz M and Andreelli F: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of metformin: An overview. Clin Sci (Lond). 122:253–270. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

332 

Masoudi FA, Wang Y, Inzucchi SE, Setaro JF, Havranek EP, Foody JM and Krumholz HM: Metformin and thiazolidinedione use in medicare patients with heart failure. JAMA. 290:81–85. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

333 

Valencia WM, Palacio A, Tamariz L and Florez H: Metformin and ageing: Improving ageing outcomes beyond glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 60:1630–1638. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

334 

Morales DR and Morris AD: Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Annu Rev Med. 66:17–29. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

335 

Qin X, Du D, Chen Q, Wu M, Wu T, Wen J, Jin Y, Zhang J and Wang S: Metformin prevents murine ovarian aging. Aging (Albany NY). 11:3785–3794. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

336 

Huang CC, Chou CH, Yang YS, Ho HN, Shun CT, Wen WF, Chen SU and Chen MJ: Metformin: A novel promising option for fertility preservation during cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Mol Hum Reprod. 27:gaaa0842021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

337 

Cao Y, Wang Z, Zhang C, Bian Y, Zhang X, Liu X, Chen W and Zhao Y: Metformin promotes in vitro maturation of oocytes from aged mice by attenuating mitochondrial oxidative stress via SIRT3-dependent SOD2ac. Front Cell Dev Biol. 10:10285102022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

338 

Ayhan S, Hancerliogullari N, Guney G, Gozukucuk M, Caydere M, Guney SS, Tokmak A and Ustun Y: Does the addition of metformin to carboplatin treatment decreases ovarian reserve damage associated with carboplatin usage? J Ovarian Res. 16:1842023. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

339 

Landry DA, Yakubovich E, Cook DP, Fasih S, Upham J and Vanderhyden BC: Metformin prevents age-associated ovarian fibrosis by modulating the immune landscape in female mice. Sci Adv. 8:eabq14752022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

340 

Gambini J, Inglés M, Olaso G, Lopez-Grueso R, Bonet-Costa V, Gimeno-Mallench L, Mas-Bargues C, Abdelaziz KM, Gomez-Cabrera MC, Vina J and Borras C: Properties of resveratrol: In vitro and in vivo studies about metabolism, bioavailability, and biological effects in animal models and humans. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015:8370422015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

341 

Rajman L, Chwalek K and Sinclair DA: Therapeutic potential of NAD-boosting molecules: The in vivo evidence. Cell Metabv. 27:529–547. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

342 

Côté CD, Rasmussen BA, Duca FA, Zadeh-Tahmasebi M, Baur JA, Daljeet M, Breen DM, Filippi BM and Lam TK: Resveratrol activates duodenal Sirt1 to reverse insulin resistance in rats through a neuronal network. Nat Med. 21:498–505. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

343 

Timmers S, Konings E, Bilet L, Houtkooper RH, van de Weijer T, Goossens GH, Hoeks J, van der Krieken S, Ryu D, Kersten S, et al: Calorie restriction-like effects of 30 days of resveratrol supplementation on energy metabolism and metabolic profile in obese humans. Cell Metab. 14:612–622. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

344 

Battaglia R, Caponnetto A, Caringella AM, Cortone A, Ferrara C, Smirni S, Iannitti R, Purrello M, D'Amato G, Fioretti B and Di Pietro C: Resveratrol treatment induces mito-miRNome modification in follicular fluid from aged women with a poor prognosis for in vitro fertilization cycles. Antioxidants (Basel). 11:10192022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

345 

Li R, Li E, Kamili G, Ou S and Yang D: Effect of resveratrol on superovulation in mice. Biomed Pharmacother. 146:1125652022. View Article : Google Scholar

346 

Gou M, Li J, Yi L, Li H, Ye X, Wang H, Liu L, Sun B, Zhang S, Zhu Z, et al: Reprogramming of ovarian aging epigenome by resveratrol. PNAS Nexus. 2:pgac3102022. View Article : Google Scholar

347 

Wu H, Xue J, Di H, Lv C, Hao Y and Nie Z: Resveratrol improves ovarian function in aged rat by inhibiting oxidative stress and activating the Sirt1. Gen Physiol Biophys. 41:53–61. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

348 

Zhou J, Xue Z, He HN, Liu X, Yin SY, Wu DY, Zhang X, Schatten H and Miao YL: Resveratrol delays postovulatory aging of mouse oocytes through activating mitophagy. Aging (Albany NY). 11:11504–11519. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

349 

Liang QX, Lin YH, Zhang CH, Sun HM, Zhou L, Schatten H, Sun QY and Qian WP: Resveratrol increases resistance of mouse oocytes to postovulatory aging in vivo. Aging (Albany NY). 10:1586–1596. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

350 

Liu MJ, Sun AG, Zhao SG, Liu H, Ma SY, Li M, Huai YX, Zhao H and Liu HB: Resveratrol improves in vitro maturation of oocytes in aged mice and humans. Fertil Steril. 109:900–907. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

351 

Okamoto N, Sato Y, Kawagoe Y, Shimizu T and Kawamura K: Short-term resveratrol treatment restored the quality of oocytes in aging mice. Aging (Albany NY). 14:5628–5640. 2022. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

352 

Sun YL, Tang SB, Shen W, Yin S and Sun QY: Roles of resveratrol in improving the quality of postovulatory aging oocytes in vitro. Cells. 8:11322019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

353 

Cai M, Sun H, Huang Y, Yao H, Zhao C, Wang J and Zhu H: Resveratrol protects rat ovarian luteinized granulosa cells from H2O2 -induced dysfunction by activating autophagy. Int J Mol Sci. 24:109142023. View Article : Google Scholar

354 

Moreira-Pinto B, Costa L, Felgueira E, Fonseca BM and Rebelo I: Low doses of resveratrol protect human granulosa cells from induced-oxidative stress. Antioxidants (Basel). 10:5612021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

355 

Pruessner M, Hellhammer DH, Pruessner JC and Lupien SJ: Self-reported depressive symptoms and stress levels in healthy young men: Associations with the cortisol response to awakening. Psychosom Med. 65:92–99. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

356 

Campagne DM: Should fertilization treatment start with reducing stress? Hum Reprod. 21:1651–1658. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

357 

Obayashi K: Salivary mental stress proteins. Clin Chim Acta. 425:196–201. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

358 

Shah K, Kumari R and Jain M: Unveiling stress markers: A systematic review investigating psychological stress biomarkers. Dev Psychobiol. 66:e224902024. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

359 

Lavalle S, Masiello E, Iannella G, Magliulo G, Pace A, Lechien JR, Calvo-Henriquez C, Cocuzza S, Parisi FM, Favier V, et al: Unraveling the complexities of oxidative stress and inflammation biomarkers in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A comprehensive review. Life (Basel). 14:4252024.PubMed/NCBI

360 

Ok J, Park S, Jung YH and Kim T: Wearable and implantable cortisol-sensing electronics for stress monitoring. Adv Mater. 36:22115952024. View Article : Google Scholar

361 

Damone AL, Joham AE, Loxton D, Earnest A, Teede HJ and Moran LJ: Depression, anxiety and perceived stress in women with and without PCOS: A community-based study. Psychol Med. 49:1510–1520. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

362 

Tay CT, Teede HJ, Hill B, Loxton D and Joham AE: Increased prevalence of eating disorders, low self-esteem, and psychological distress in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A community-based cohort study. Fertil Steril. 112:353–361. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

363 

Rowlands IJ, Teede H, Lucke J, Dobson AJ and Mishra GD: Young women's psychological distress after a diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome or endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 31:2072–2081. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2025
Volume 55 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hu Y, Wang W, Ma W, Wang W, Ren W, Wang S, Fu F and Li Y: Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review). Int J Mol Med 55: 34, 2025.
APA
Hu, Y., Wang, W., Ma, W., Wang, W., Ren, W., Wang, S. ... Li, Y. (2025). Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review). International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 55, 34. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5475
MLA
Hu, Y., Wang, W., Ma, W., Wang, W., Ren, W., Wang, S., Fu, F., Li, Y."Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 55.2 (2025): 34.
Chicago
Hu, Y., Wang, W., Ma, W., Wang, W., Ren, W., Wang, S., Fu, F., Li, Y."Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review)". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 55, no. 2 (2025): 34. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2024.5475