Let-7g and miR-21 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features

  • Authors:
    • Alessandra Capodanno
    • Laura Boldrini
    • Agnese Proietti
    • Greta Alì
    • Serena Pelliccioni
    • Cristina Niccoli
    • Armida D'Incecco
    • Federico Cappuzzo
    • Antonio Chella
    • Marco Lucchi
    • Alfredo Mussi
    • Gabriella Fontanini
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 2, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2003
  • Pages: 765-774
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play a key role in cancer pathogenesis and are involved in several human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluated Let-7g and miR-21 expression by quantitative real-time PCR in 80 NSCLC patients and correlated the results with their main clinicopathological and molecular features. MiR-21 expression was significantly higher in NSCLC tissues compared to non-cancer lung tissues (p<0.0001), while no significant changes in Let-7g expression were observed between the tumor and normal lung tissues. Target prediction analysis led to the identification of 26 miR-21 and 24 Let-7g putative target genes that play important roles in cancer pathogenesis and progression. No significant association was observed between the analysed miRNAs and the main clinicopathological or molecular characteristics of the NSCLC patients, although both miRNAs were downregulated in squamous cell carcinomas compared to adenocarcinomas. Noteworthy, we observed a significant association between low Let-7g expression and metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis (p=0.046), as well as between high miR-21 expression and K-Ras mutations (p=0.0003). Survival analysis did not show any significant correlation between prognosis and the analysed miRNAs, although the patients with a high Let-7g and miR-21 expression showed a significantly lower short-term progression-free survival (p=0.01 and p=0.0003, respectively) and overall survival (p=0.023 and p=0.0045, respectively). In conclusion, we showed that Let-7g and miR-21 expression was deregulated in NSCLC and we demonstrated a strong relationship between miR-21 overexpression and K-Ras mutations. Our data indicate that Let-7g and miR-21 profiling combined with the determination of K-Ras mutational status may be considered a useful biomarker for a more effective molecular characterization and clinical management of NSCLC patients.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide (1) and 85% of the cases are represented by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which is classified into three different histological subtypes: adenocarcinoma (ADC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and large cell carcinoma (LCC) (24). Despite a better understanding of the NSCLC pathogenesis and significant improvement in early diagnosis and treatment, the overall 5-year survival is extremely low (~15%) and the patients show high recurrence rates even at the early disease stages (17), highlighting the necessity of a deeper knowledge of NSCLC biology and the identification of more effective biomarkers.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a highly conserved family of small (17–22 nucleotides), non-coding, endogenous, single-stranded RNA molecules that negatively regulate gene expression by binding to complementary sequences on target messenger RNA (mRNA) (8,9). Recently, miRNAs have been shown to regulate essential cell processes, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, development and metabolism (911), and to play a key role in cancer pathogenesis (1216). Moreover, a miRNA prognostic and diagnostic value has been reported in several malignancies, including lung cancer (1416).

The first reported miRNA aberrantly expressed in lung cancer was the Let-7 family (17). A reduced Let-7 expression has been significantly correlated with a short post-operative survival in the NSCLC patients (17). Moreover, the ectopic Let-7 expression inhibits cell proliferation in human NSCLC cell lines (18) and reduces tumor burden in mouse NSCLC xenografts (19). Let-7 family members have been demonstrated to behave as tumor suppressor genes and to functionally inhibit several cell cycle regulators and oncogenes, such as Ras family, c-Myc and HMGA2 genes, whose 3′UTRs show multiple Let-7 binding sites (13,20,21).

Conversely, a role as oncogene has been suggested for miR-21 that is deregulated in glioblastoma and lung cancer (2225). A miR-21 overexpression has been suggested to be an independent negative prognostic factor for the overall survival in NSCLC patients (23) and to be related to the lung carcinogenesis in never smokers (26). Several mRNAs have been identified as miR-21 targets, including PDCD4, PTEN, TGF-β and MMP9 genes (22,27).

The aim of this study was to evaluate Let-7g and miR-21 expression in a series of 80 NSCLC patients to establish their involvement in the NSCLC pathogenesis and their potential diagnostic, prognostic and predictive value.

Materials and methods

Patients

Eighty NSCLC patients were retrospectively selected from patients who had undergone surgery at the Unit of Thoracic Surgery of the A.O.U.P. between 2005 and 2012. Histological diagnoses were independently formulated by two pathologists (G.F. and G.A.) according to the World Health Organization classification (24) and discrepant diagnoses were re-evaluated and discussed until an agreement was reached. Clinicopathological characteristics were collected whenever available for all the patients, while detailed clinical data were obtained only for 55 patients. The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee and all the patients gave their informed consent to the molecular analyses.

DNA and RNA isolation

DNA and RNA were isolated from 10-μm sections of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues or cytological specimens after manual tumor macrodissection using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (Qiagen) and miRNeasy FFPE kit (Qiagen), respectively, according to the manufacturer's instructions.

MiRNA expression

Quantification of Let-7g, miR-21 and RNU6B expression was carried out in triplicate into 80 NSCLC and 27 non-cancer lung tissues using specific TaqMan® MicroRNA assays (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 10 ng of total RNA were retro-transcribed by the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription (RT) kit (Applied Biosystems) and 1.3 μl of RT product were analysed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) on the Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett Research). Threshold cycle (Ct) and baselines were determined by manual settings. MiRNA expression was calculated by relative quantification and fold expression changes were determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method using the DataAssist™ software (Applied Biosystems).

Target prediction and pathway analysis

Let-7g and miR-21 target genes were predicted by four different miRNA target prediction algorithms: miRanda (http://www.microrna.org/microrna), TargetScan (http://www.targetscan.org), Pictar (http://www.pictar.org) and miRDB (http://www.mirdb.org). Gene ontology classification and pathway analysis were performed using the PANTHER software (http://www.pantherdb.org).

Mutational analysis

K-Ras gene (Reference sequence: ENSG00000133703) status in codons 12 and 13 was analyzed by pyrosequencing using the Anti-EGFR MoAb response® kit (K-Ras status) (Diatech Pharmacogenetics) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

PCR-single stranded conformation polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) and sequencing analysis were used for genotyping exons 18–21 of the EGFR gene (Reference sequence: ENSG00000146648). The primer sequences were as follows: exon 18, 5′-CTCTGTGTTCTTGTCCCCCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCCTGTGCCAGGGACCTTAC-3′ (reverse); exon 19, 5′-CATGTGGCACCATCTCACA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCACACAGCAAAGCAGAAAC-3′ (reverse); exon 20, 5′-CACACTGACGTGCCTCTCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TATCTCCCCTCCCCGTATCT-3′ (reverse); exon 21, 5′-CCTCACAGCAGGGTCTTCTC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCTGGTGTCAGGAAAATGCT-3′ (reverse). Briefly, 100 ng of DNA were amplified by PCR using the FastStart Taq DNA Polymerase (Roche Diagnostics) on the T3000 Thermocycler 48 (Biometra), as follows: 4 min at 95°C, 40 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 58°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 45 sec and 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were mixed with an equivalent formamide volume, denatured at 95°C for 5 min and run onto a non-denaturing 12.5% polyacrylamide gel (GE Healthcare) at 18°C and constant 25 mA for 1 h and 40 min. Denaturated DNA was visualized by the PlusOne DNA silver staining kit (GE Healthcare) and samples with altered mobility patterns were sequenced as previously described (28).

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance and χ2 test were used to determine the association between miRNA expression and the different parameters, while survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analyses were performed using the JMP10 software (SAS) and a two-tailed p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

This study was conducted in 80 patients with NSCLC, including 55 ADCs, 21 SCCs, 2 LCCs and 2 undifferentiated NSCLCs. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range 46–85) and the median follow-up was 32 months (range 7–98). Disease progression with distant and/or loco-regional recurrence and death from lung cancer were observed in 34 (61.8%) and 14 (25.5%) of the 55 NSCLC patients, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18 months (95% CI, 14–24) and 24 months (95% CI, 18–30), respectively.

Let-7g and miR-21 expression profile

We quantified the mature Let-7g and miR-21 expression normalized to the RNU6B endogenous control in 80 NSCLC and 27 non-cancer lung tissues. The unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of miRNA expression using the Euclidean distance as a similarity measure and average linkage algorithm revealed two major clusters based on similarities in miR-21 expression that clearly separated the tumor from non-cancer tissues. On the contrary, we did not observe a clear separation between tumor and normal samples based on Let-7g expression (Fig. 1A).

Let-7g was barely detectable in lung tissues and we did not observe any significant difference between the NSCLC and normal samples (−0.897±0.148 vs. −0.709±0.168, p=0.585, Fig. 1B). Conversely, a highly significant increase in miR-21 expression was observed in the NSCLC tissues compared to the non-cancer ones (4.842±0.163 vs. 2.509±0.182, p<0.0001, Fig. 1C).

MiRNA profile and clinicopathological characteristics

To determine whether miRNA profile was correlated with the main clinicopathological characteristics, the NSCLC patients were divided into Let-7g and miR-21 high and low expression groups based on the median fold-change values (1.315±0.175 for Let-7g and 6.964±0.759 for miR-21). Except for a significant association between the low Let-7g expression and metastatic lymph node presence at diagnosis (p=0.046), no other statistically significant associations were observed between the analysed miRNA and the main clinicopathological characteristics of the NSCLC patients (Table I). Interestingly, both Let-7g and miR-21 were upregulated in ADCs compared to SCCs, although these relationships were not statistically significant (Fig. 2A and B).

Table I

Correlations between the Let-7g and miR-21 expression and the main clinicopathological characteristics of the NSCLC patients.

Table I

Correlations between the Let-7g and miR-21 expression and the main clinicopathological characteristics of the NSCLC patients.

Let-7g expressionamiR-21 expressiona


CharacteristicLowHighp-valuebLowHighp-valueb
Age
 ≤67 years22 (57.9)16 (42.1)0.26319 (50)19 (50)0.823
 >67 years18 (42.8)24 (57.2)21 (50)21 (50)
Gender
 Males28 (50.9)27 (49.1)0.80927 (49.1)28 (50.9)0.809
 Females12 (48)13 (52)13 (52)12 (48)
Histology
 ADC27 (49.1)28 (50.9)0.15724 (43.6)31 (56.4)0.065
 SCC13 (61.9)8 (38.1)14 (66.7)7 (33.3)
 LCC0 (0)2 (100)2 (100)0 (0)
 Others0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)2 (100)
Tumor stage
 T1 (T1a-T1b)6 (50)6 (50)0.1115 (41.7)7 (58.3)0.793
 T2 (T2a-T2b)16 (51.6)15 (48.4)13 (41.9)18 (58.1)
 T32 (14.3)12 (85.7)8 (57.2)6 (42.8)
 T43 (50)3 (50)3 (50)3 (50)
Lymph node status
 Negative4 (21.1)15 (78.9)0.0469 (47.4)10 (52.6)0.633
 Positive20 (52.6)18 (47.4)14 (36.8)24 (63.2)
Smoking
 Never smoking7 (53.8)6 (46.2)0.4257 (53.8)6 (46.2)0.872
 Former smoking17 (65.4)9 (34.6)16 (61.5)10 (38.5)
 Current smoking2 (100)0 (0)1 (50)1 (50)
Performance status
 ECOG 05 (45.5)6 (54.5)0.3965 (45.5)6 (54.5)0.149
 ECOG 120 (69)9 (31)18 (62.1)11 (37.9)
 ECOG 21 (50)1 (50)2 (100)0 (0)
TKI response
 Complete response1 (100)0 (0)0.1811 (100)0 (0)0.218
 Partial response13 (72.2)5 (27.8)10 (55.6)8 (44.4)
 Stable disease7 (70)3 (30)6 (60)4 (40)
 Progressive disease5 (55.6)4 (44.4)7 (77.8)2 (22.2)
Disease recurrence
 NED10 (47.6)11 (52.4)0.0728 (38.1)13 (61.9)0.189
 Recurrence20 (58.8)14 (41.2)21 (61.8)13 (38.2)

a Values are shown as n (%).

b p-values were assessed by χ2 test and significant p-values are in bold.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-ijo-43-03-0765'] } ADC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; LCC, large cell carcinoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NED, no evidence of disease.

MiRNA profile and K-Ras and EGFR status

To investigate whether Let-7g and miR-21 expression was correlated to K-Ras and EGFR mutational status, we performed genotyping in the 80 NSCLC patients, except 2, due to insufficient tissue. K-Ras and EGFR mutations were observed in 16 (20.5%) and 23 (29.5%) of the 78 NSCLC patients, respectively (Table II).

Table II

EGFR and K-Ras mutational status in the NSCLC patients.

Table II

EGFR and K-Ras mutational status in the NSCLC patients.

GeneExonID sampleNucleotide substitutionAmino acid substitution
EGFR19AD20, AD23, AD24, AD26, AD32, AD39c.2235_2249delp.E746_A750
EGFR19AD28, AD29, AD35, AD40c.2236_2250delp.E746_A750
EGFR19AD16, AD21, AD37 c.2237_2255delinsT p.E746_S752delinsV
EGFR19AD22 c.2239_2264delinsGCCAA p.L747_A755delinsAN
EGFR19AD25c.2240_2257del p.L747_P753delinsS
EGFR19+20AD27 c.2235_2249del+c.2369C>T p.E746_A750+p.T790M
EGFR20AD41 c.2311_2312insGCGTGGACA p.D770_N771insSVD
EGFR20AD36c.2353A>Cp.T785P
EGFR21AD7c.2570G>Ap.G857E
EGFR21AD31, AD33, AD38, AD42c.2573T>Gp.L858R
K-Ras2AD9, AD10, AD15, AD17, AD18, AD44c.34G>Tp.G12C
K-Ras2AD65 c.34_35GG>TTp.G12F
K-Ras2LC1, AD19, AD45, AD46c.35G>Tp.G12V
K-Ras2AD1, AD14, AD62c.35G>Cp.G12A
K-Ras2AD61c.35G>Ap.G12D
K-Ras2AD43 c.37_38GG>CCp.G13P

K-Ras and EGFR mutations were mutually exclusive, observed only in the NSCLC patients with ADC and associated with gender (Table III). As is shown in Table III, EGFR status was also significantly associated with the smoking habit (p=0.0086), performance status (p=0.0008) and response to the treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (p=0.0076).

Table III

EGFR and K-Ras status in relation to the main clinicopathological and biological characteristics of the NSCLC patients.

Table III

EGFR and K-Ras status in relation to the main clinicopathological and biological characteristics of the NSCLC patients.

EGFR statusaK-Ras statusa


CharacteristicWild-typeMutatedp-valuebWild-typeMutatedp-valueb
EGFR status
 Wild-type39 (70.9)16 (29.1)0.0095
 Mutated23 (100)0 (0)
Age
 ≤67 years24 (43.6)12 (52.2)0.659525 (40.3)11 (68.8)0.0797
 >67 years31 (56.4)11 (47.8)37 (59.7)5 (31.2)
Gender
 Males47 (85.5)7 (30.4) <0.000139 (62.9)15 (93.8)0.0376
 Females8 (14.5)16 (69.6)23 (37.1)1 (6.2)
Histology
 ADC32 (58.2)22 (95.7)0.004939 (62.9)15 (93.8)0.0369
 SCC20 (36.4)0 (0)20 (32.3)0 (0)
 LCC2 (3.6)0 (0)2 (3.2)0 (0)
 Others1 (1.8)1 (4.3)1 (1.6)1 (6.2)
Tumor stage
 T1 (T1a-T1b)9 (20.0)3 (16.7)0.15119 (18.4)3 (21.4)0.3189
 T2 (T2a-T2b)20 (44.4)11 (61.1)27 (55.1)4 (28.6)
 T313 (28.9)1 (5.5)9 (18.4)5 (35.7)
 T43 (6.7)3 (16.7)4 (8.1)2 (14.3)
Lymph node status
 Negative16 (39)3 (18.8)0.251615 (34.1)4 (30.8)0.9111
 Positive25 (61)13 (81.2)29 (65.9)9 (69.2)
Smoking
 Never smoking4 (15.4)9 (60)0.008612 (35.3)1 (14.3)0.2975
 Former smoking21 (80.8)5 (33.3)21 (61.8)5 (71.4)
 Current smoking1 (3.8)1 (6.7)1 (2.9)1 (14.3)
Performance status
 ECOG 02 (18.2)9 (81.8)0.000810 (90.9)1 (9.1)0.5509
 ECOG 123 (79.3)6 (20.7)23 (79.3)6 (20.7)
 ECOG 22 (100)0 (0)2 (100)0 (0)
TKI response
 Complete response0 (0)1 (100)0.00761 (100)0 (0)0.5417
 Partial response7 (38.9)11 (61.1)16 (88.9)2 (11.1)
 Stable disease9 (90)1 (10)7 (70)3 (30)
 Progressive disease8 (88.9)1 (11.1)8 (88.9)1 (11.1)
Disease recurrence
 NED13 (35.1)7 (41.2)0.901614 (34.1)6 (46.2)0.6515
 Recurrence24 (64.9)10 (58.8)27 (65.9)7 (53.8)
Let-7g expression
 Low27 (49.1)11 (47.8)0.883532 (51.6)6 (37.5)0.4676
 High28 (50.9)12 (52.2)30 (48.4)10 (62.5)
miR-21 expression
 Low27 (49.1)12 (52.2)0.803938 (61.3)1 (6.2)0.0003
 High28 (50.9)11 (47.8)24 (38.7)15 (93.8)

a Values are shown as n (%).

b p-values were assessed by χ2 test and significant p-values are in bold.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn6-ijo-43-03-0765'] } ADC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; LCC, large cell carcinoma; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; NED, no evidence of disease.

Statistical analysis did not show any significant association between EGFR mutations and Let-7g or miR-21 expression, while we found a highly significant association between K-Ras status and miR-21 expression (p=0.0003, Table III). Noteworthy, a significantly higher miR-21 expression was observed in the NSCLC patients with K-Ras-mutated tumors (14.237±1.638, p<0.001) compared to the patients with K-Ras-wild-type tumors (7.316±0.792, Fig. 2C).

miRNA target prediction and pathway analysis

Let-7g and miR-21 target gene analysis by miRanda, TargetScan, Pictar and miRDB prediction algorithms led to the identification of a plethora of putative target genes for these miRNAs. In order to minimize the number of false positives, we recorded a gene as a putative target gene of the analysed miRNAs only if it was predicted by at least two prediction algorithms with a high confidence score. According to these stringent criteria, we identified 24 putative target genes for Let-7g, including HMGA2, ERCC6 and MAP3K3 genes and 26 putative target genes for miR-21, including PDCD4, MSH2 and SPRY1/SPRY2 genes (Table IV).

Table IV

Putative target genes of the dysregulated Let-7g and miR-21 in the NSCLC patients.

Table IV

Putative target genes of the dysregulated Let-7g and miR-21 in the NSCLC patients.

miRNALocusPathwayTarget genes
Let-7g3p21.1Cell cycleHMGA2, E2F5, COIL, DNA2, CCNJ, CCND2, CDC25A, LIN28B, BACH1
Transcription/transductionBZW1, HIC2
DNA repairERCC6, SMARCAD1, BACH1
ApoptosisN-MYC, CASP3, MAP4K3
MAPK/ERK pathwayN-RAS, MAP3K3, MAP4K3, MAPK6
Insulin/TGFβ pathwayFOXP2, IGF1R, IGF2BP2
PI3K/Akt pathwayN-RAS, FOXP2, CCND2
Wnt pathwayEND1, END2, N-MYC
miR-2117q23.2Cell cycleSTAG2, KIF6
DNA repairMSH2, FANCC, CHD7
ApoptosisPDCD4, APAF1, STAT3, MALT1, SGK3
AngiogenesisSOS2, JAG1, MAP3K1, STAT3
ProteolysisWWP1
Cell adhesionCCL1, MATN2, TGFBI, VCL
MAPK/ERK pathwayMAP3K1, STAT3, SOS2, NKIRAS1, SPRY1, SPRY2
TGFβ pathwayBMPR2, SMAD7
G-protein pathwaySOS2, TIAM2, GPR64, KRIT1

We further investigated the biological consequences of Let-7g and miR-21 aberrant expression grouping the predicted target genes by gene ontology terms. This analysis revealed that most of cell processes regulated by these miRNAs play a key role in cancer pathogenesis and are mainly involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, DNA repair, cell adhesion and signal transduction pathways (Table IV).

Survival analysis

To evaluate the relationships of Let-7g and miR-21 expression with the prognosis of the NSCLC patients, we performed a survival analysis by the Kaplan-Meier method using the disease recurrence and the overall post-operative survival as end-points. We did not observe any significant difference in PFS and OS of the NSCLC patients with a high Let-7g or miR-21 expression compared to the patients with a low expression of these miRNAs (Fig. 3). However, we further investigated Let-7g and miR-21 as prognostic indicators by restricting our analysis to the first 30 months of the follow-up to verify a possible short-term prognostic value of Let-7g and miR-21 evaluation. Interestingly, we found that the NSCLC patients with a high Let-7g or miR-21 expression showed a significantly shorter mean PFS and OS compared to the patients with a low expression of these miRNAs (Table V).

Table V

Short-term correlations between the prognosis of the NSCLC patients and the Let-7 and miR-21 expression.

Table V

Short-term correlations between the prognosis of the NSCLC patients and the Let-7 and miR-21 expression.

CharacteristicPFS (months)ap-valuebOS (months)ap-valueb
Let-7g expression
 Low18 (15–22)0.0120 (16–23)0.023
 High12 (8–16)13 (9–17)
miR-21 expression
 Low19 (16–23)0.000321 (17–25)0.0045
 High11 (8–14)13 (9–17)

a Values are shown as mean (95% CI).

b p-values were assessed by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant p-values are in bold.

Discussion

Lung cancer is the first cause of death for cancer worldwide and >80% of the cases are NSCLC (14). Although early diagnosis and patient care have greatly improved in recent years, most of the NSCLC patients show locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis and their prognosis remains extremely poor (17). Currently, no appropriate diagnostic biomarker exists for NSCLC, highlighting the need of a better knowledge of its biology to improve prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

MiRNAs are a highly conserved family of small non-coding RNA molecules that negatively regulate gene expression (8,9) and their aberrant expression has been found to play a key role in pathogenesis of several malignancies, including NSCLC (1316). This study was aimed to evaluate Let-7g and miR-21 expression profile in the NSCLC patients in order to establish their role in NSCLC pathogenesis and their potential diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance.

We demonstrated that miR-21 expression strongly differentiates the NSCLC from non-cancer lung tissues, while we did not observe any Let-7g discriminative value. In our study, a highly significant increase was found in miR-21 expression in NSCLC tissues compared to the non-cancer ones, in agreement with previous results that demonstrated a miR-21 overexpression in tumor tissues from several human malignancies (23,2931). Conversely, we observed a reduced Let-7g expression that was expressed at comparable levels in NSCLC and non-cancer lung tissues. Let-7g downregulation in NSCLC tissues has been previously reported by several authors, who have also demonstrated that the aberrant expression of Let-7 family represents an early event during NSCLC carcinogenesis and is more common in SCCs compared to ADCs (12,19,32,33). In our study, Let-7g and miR-21 are downregulated in SCCs compared to ADCs, but their evaluation has not been shown to have a significant diagnostic value in discriminating between these two different histotypes, as previously reported in larger miRNA profiling studies (29,30). Landi et al(30) reported that Let-7g and miR-21 differential expression allows to discriminate between ADC and SCC in the early-stage tumors (stage I), but not in the advanced stage (stage II–IV), suggesting that miRNA expression loses its histology-specificity in the more advanced and less differentiated tumors. Therefore, the lack of a statistical significance we observed between the altered Let-7g and miR-21 expression and NSCLC histology could be explained by the fact that most of the enrolled patients were diagnosed in an advanced stage, where miRNA histology-related expression may be not specific.

Concerning the other analysed clinicopathological characteristics, we did not observe any significant correlation between the Let-7g and miR-21 dysregulated expression and the clinicopathological features, including age, tumor stage, therapy response and smoking habit. In particular, our results concerning the relationship between the miR-21 expression and the smoking habit are in disagreement with data reported by Seike et al(26), who demonstrated that miR-21 expression is significantly higher in tumors from smokers than from never smokers; however, this discrepancy could be due to the small number of patients for whom we had smoking data. Interestingly, we found that Let-7g expression is significantly associated with lymph nodal status. We showed that most of the NSCLC patients with a low Let-7g expression present metastatic lymph nodes at diagnosis, while no substantial differences were observed for the patients with a high Let-7g expression. This result suggests an important role of Let-7g in NSCLC tumor progression and acquisition of metastatic potential and is supported by in vivo studies showing that ectopic Let-7g expression in NSCLC xenografts induce a significant decrease in tumor growth and spread (17,18).

Since the importance of EGFR and K-Ras mutation detection in current management of the NSCLC patients, we explored the relationship between their mutational status and Let-7g and miR-21 expression profile. In our study, the frequency of K-Ras mutation (20.5%) was in agreement with previously reported data (34,35), whereas EGFR mutation incidence was slightly higher (29.5%) than that reported in the literature for lung cancer (15–20%) (6,3638), because many of the recruited patients belonged to a larger study designed to evaluate the EGFR TKI response. According to previously reported data (20,21,30,39), Let-7g expression was not correlated with EGFR or K-Ras mutational status. However, several studies have demonstrated that Let-7g acts as a K-Ras negative regulator by binding to multiple sites of their 3′UTRs (40) and that lung cancer tissues with reduced Let-7g levels have significantly higher K-Ras levels compared to their corresponding normal tissues (18,20). Therefore, it is possible that the aberrant expression of Let-7g and K-Ras mutations are mutually exclusive in NSCLC carcinogenesis with a more predominant effect of Let-7g dysregulation in SCCs, which show a low expression of this miRNA compared to the other NSCLC histotypes and a more prominent role of K-Ras mutations in ADC carcinogenesis (32,33).

Furthermore, we first demonstrated a strong and highly significant correlation between the high miR-21 expression and the presence of mutations in the codons 12 and 13 of K-Ras gene, suggesting a synergistic interplay between miR-21 and K-Ras oncogenes that supports neoplastic phenotype in NSCLC. Based on miR-21 expression and target gene prediction results, we might hypothesize an auto-regulatory loop between oncogenic K-Ras and miR-21 mediated by the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway, SPRY1/SPRY2 and PDCD4 (Fig. 4). K-Ras mutations determine a constitutive protein activation with a consequent activation of the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway, which plays an important role in lung carcinogenesis by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting cell proliferation, cell growth, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis (41). On the other hand, miR-21 modulates several components critical to the NSCLC pathogenesis by targeting apoptotic effectors and antagonists of the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway (22,25,27). The high miR-21 expression observed in our NSCLC patients might cause a decrease in SPRY1/SPRY2 expression that has been demonstrated to negatively regulate the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway and to enhance cell migration (42). In addition, the negative regulation of PDCD4 and Apaf-1 genes by miR-21 leads to apoptosis inhibition (22,27,43), as well as to the removal of the PDCD4 inhibitory effect on AP-1, which is downstream the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway and promotes miR-21 expression (44,45). This complex and auto-regulatory circuit might justify the high levels of miR-21 expression observed in our study in the NSCLC patients harbouring K-Ras mutations and might have a final stimulation effect on the processes that promote tumor progression and therapy resistance (Fig. 4).

We investigated the relationship between the differential Let-7g and miR-21 expression and prognosis of the NSCLC patients without observing any statistically significant correlation. These results are in disagreement with data reported by other authors that support a negative prognostic role for Let-7g, whose downregulation has been associated with a reduced overall post-operative survival in NSCLC patients (1821), and miR-21, whose overexpression has been associated with a poor prognosis irrespective of the TNM stage and lymph nodal status (23,26,46). However, these discrepant results could be due to the small number of patients with available clinical data. Interestingly, by restricting our analysis to the first 30 months of the follow-up observation, we demonstrated that the NSCLC patients with a high expression of either Let-7g or miR-21 show a highly significant shorter PFS and OS compared to the patients with a low expression of both these miRNAs, suggesting a possible negative short-term prognostic value of the evaluation of Let-7g and miR-21 expression.

In conclusion, our data show that Let-7g and miR-21 are aberrantly expressed in the NSCLC patients and that there is a close interplay among K-Ras, miR-21 and Let-7g in NSCLC, suggesting that their systematic evaluation could represent a useful biomarker in the molecular characterization and management of NSCLC patients.

References

1 

Siegel R, Naishadham D and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 62:10–29. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Muller-Hemerlink HK and Harris CC; World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart. IARC Press; Lyon: 2004

3 

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, Beer DG, Powell CA, Riely GJ, Van Schil PE, Garg K, Austin JH, Asamura H, Rusch VW, Hirsch FR, Scagliotti G, Mitsudomi T, Huber RM, Ishikawa Y, Jett J, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Sculier JP, Takahashi T, Tsuboi M, Vansteenkiste J, Wistuba I, Yang PC, Aberle D, Brambilla C, Flieder D, Franklin W, Gazdar A, Gould M, Hasleton P, Henderson D, Johnson B, Johnson D, Kerr K, Kuriyama K, Lee JS, Miller VA, Petersen I, Roggli V, Rosell R, Saijo N, Thunnissen E, Tsao M and Yankelewitz D: International association for the study of lung cancer/American thoracic society/European respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 6:244–285. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson A, Geisinger K, Yatabe Y, Ishikawa Y, Wistuba I, Flieder DB, Franklin W, Gazdar A, Hasleton PS, Henderson DW, Kerr KM, Petersen I, Roggli V, Thunnissen E and Tsao M: Diagnosis of lung cancer in small biopsies and cytology: implications of the 2011 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 137:668–684. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Bronte G, Rizzo S, La Paglia L, Adamo V, Siragusa S, Ficorella C, Santini D, Bazan V, Colucci G, Gebbia N and Russo A: Driver mutations and differential sensitivity to targeted therapies: a new approach to the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 36:S21–S29. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pao W and Girard N: New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 12:175–180. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Saintigny P and Burger JA: Recent advances in non-small cell lung cancer biology and clinical management. Discov Med. 13:287–297. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

8 

He L and Hannon GJ: MicroRNAs: small RNAs with big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet. 5:522–531. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism and function. Cell. 116:281–297. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Schmittgen TD: Regulation of microRNA processing in development, differentiation and cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 12:1811–1819. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Huang Y, Shen XJ, Zou Q, Wang SP, Tang SM and Zhang GZ: Biological functions of microRNAs: a review. J Physiol Biochem. 67:129–139. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Calin GA, Sevignani C, Dumitru CD, Hyslop T, Noch E, Yendamuri S, Shimizu M, Rattan S, Bullrich F, Negrini M and Croce CM: Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:2999–3004. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Zhang B, Pan X, Cobb GP and Anderson TA: microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol. 302:1–12. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Bartels CL and Tsongalis GJ: MicroRNAs: novel biomarkers for human cancer. Clin Chem. 55:623–631. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Farazi TA, Spitzer JI, Morozov P and Tuschl T: miRNAs in human cancer. J Pathol. 223:102–115. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Iorio MV and Croce CM: MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med. 4:143–159. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, Tomida S, Osada H, Endoh H, Harano T, Yatabe Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y, Mitsudomi T and Takahashi T: Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res. 64:3753–3756. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Johnson CD, Esquela-Kerscher A, Stefani G, Byrom M, Kelnar K, Ovcharenko D, Wilson M, Wang X, Shelton J, Shingara J, Chin L, Brown D and Slack FJ: The let-7 microRNA represses cell proliferation pathways in human cells. Cancer Res. 67:7713–7722. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kumar MS, Erkeland SJ, Pester RE, Chen CY, Ebert MS, Sharp PA and Jacks T: Suppression of non-small cell lung tumor development by the let-7 microRNA family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:3903–3908. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, Byrom M, Jarvis R, Cheng A, Labourier E, Reinert KL, Brown D and Slack FJ: RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell. 120:635–647. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Roush S and Slack FJ: The let-7 family of microRNAs. Trends Cell Biol. 18:505–516. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Krichevsky AM and Gabriely G: miR-21: a small multi-faceted RNA. J Cell Mol Med. 13:39–53. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Gao W, Yu Y, Cao H, Shen H, Li X, Pan S and Shu Y: Deregulated expression of miR-21, miR-143 and miR-181a in non small cell lung cancer is related to clinicopathologic characteristics or patient prognosis. Biomed Pharmacother. 64:399–408. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Moore LM and Zhang W: Targeting miR-21 in glioma: a small RNA with big potential. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 14:1247–1257. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Pan X, Wang ZX and Wang R: MicroRNA-21: a novel therapeutic target in human cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 10:1224–1232. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Seike M, Goto A, Okano T, Bowman ED, Schetter AJ, Horikawa I, Mathe EA, Jen J, Yang P, Sugimura H, Gemma A, Kudoh S, Croce CM and Harris CC: MiR-21 is an EGFR-regulated anti-apoptotic factor in lung cancer in never-smokers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:12085–12090. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Selcuklu SD, Donoghue MT and Spillane C: miR-21 as a key regulator of oncogenic processes. Biochem Soc Trans. 37:918–925. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Capodanno A, Boldrini L, Alì G, Pelliccioni S, Mussi A and Fontanini G: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase α catalytic subunit gene somatic mutations in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumours. Oncol Rep. 28:1559–1566. 2012.

29 

Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, Visone R, Iorio M, Roldo C, Ferracin M, Prueitt RL, Yanaihara N, Lanza G, Scarpa A, Vecchione A, Negrini M, Harris CC and Croce CM: A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:2257–2261. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Landi MT, Zhao Y, Rotunno M, Koshiol J, Liu H, Bergen AW, Rubagotti M, Goldstein AM, Linnoila I, Marincola FM, Tucker MA, Bertazzi PA, Pesatori AC, Caporaso NE, McShane LM and Wang E: MicroRNA expression differentiates histology and predicts survival of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 16:430–441. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, Ghoshal K, Jacob ST and Patel T: MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology. 133:647–658. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Mitsudomi T, Oyama T, Nishida K, Ogami A, Osaki T, Sugio K, Yasumoto K, Sugimachi K and Gazdar AF: Loss of heterozygosity at 3p in non-small cell lung cancer and its prognostic implication. Clin Cancer Res. 2:1185–1189. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zabarovsky ER, Lerman MI and Minna JD: Tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 3p involved in the pathogenesis of lung and other cancers. Oncogene. 21:6915–6935. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Riely GJ, Marks J and Pao W: KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 6:201–205. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Mao C, Qiu LX, Liao RY, Du FB, Ding H, Yang WC, Li J and Chen Q: KRAS mutations and resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. Lung Cancer. 69:272–278. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Yatabe Y and Mitsudomi T: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancers. Pathol Int. 57:233–244. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Ladanyi M and Pao W: Lung adenocarcinoma: guiding EGFR-targeted therapy and beyond. Mod Pathol. 21:S16–S22. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Dacic S: Molecular diagnostics of lung carcinomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 135:622–629. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Dacic S, Kelly L, Shuai Y and Nikiforova MN: miRNA expression profiling of lung adenocarcinomas: correlation with mutational status. Mod Pathol. 23:1577–1582. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Chin LJ, Ratner E, Leng S, Zhai R, Nallur S, Babar I, Muller RU, Straka E, Su L, Burki EA, Crowell RE, Patel R, Kulkarni T, Homer R, Zelterman D, Kidd KK, Zhu Y, Christiani DC, Belinsky SA, Slack FJ and Weidhaas JB: A SNP in a let-7 microRNA complementary site in the KRAS 3′ untranslated region increases non-small cell lung cancer risk. Cancer Res. 68:8535–8540. 2008.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Boutros T, Chevet E and Metrakos P: Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase/MAP kinase phosphatase regulation: roles in cell growth, death and cancer. Pharmacol Rev. 60:261–310. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Hatley ME, Patrick DM, Garcia MR, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, van Rooij E and Olson EN: Modulation of K-Ras-dependent lung tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21. Cancer Cell. 18:282–293. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Lu Z, Liu M, Stribinskis V, Klinge CM, Ramos KS, Colburn NH and Li Y: MicroRNA-21 promotes cell transformation by targeting the programmed cell death 4 gene. Oncogene. 27:4373–4379. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Hwang SK, Jin H, Kwon JT, Chang SH, Kim TH, Cho CS, Lee KH, Young MR, Colburn NH, Beck GR Jr, Yang HS and Cho MH: Aerosol-delivered programmed cell death 4 enhanced apoptosis, controlled cell cycle and suppressed AP-1 activity in the lungs of AP-1 luciferase reporter mice. Gene Ther. 14:1353–1361. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

45 

Talotta F, Cimmino A, Matarazzo MR, Casalino L, De Vita G, D'Esposito M, Di Lauro R and Verde P: An autoregulatory loop mediated by miR-21 and PDCD4 controls the AP-1 activity in RAS transformation. Oncogene. 28:73–84. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Markou A, Tsaroucha EG, Kaklamanis L, Fotinou M, Georgoulias V and Lianidou ES: Prognostic value of mature microRNA-21 and microRNA-205 overexpression in non-small cell lung cancer by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Clin Chem. 54:1696–1704. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September 2013
Volume 43 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Capodanno A, Boldrini L, Proietti A, Alì G, Pelliccioni S, Niccoli C, D'Incecco A, Cappuzzo F, Chella A, Lucchi M, Lucchi M, et al: Let-7g and miR-21 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features. Int J Oncol 43: 765-774, 2013.
APA
Capodanno, A., Boldrini, L., Proietti, A., Alì, G., Pelliccioni, S., Niccoli, C. ... Fontanini, G. (2013). Let-7g and miR-21 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features. International Journal of Oncology, 43, 765-774. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2003
MLA
Capodanno, A., Boldrini, L., Proietti, A., Alì, G., Pelliccioni, S., Niccoli, C., D'Incecco, A., Cappuzzo, F., Chella, A., Lucchi, M., Mussi, A., Fontanini, G."Let-7g and miR-21 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features". International Journal of Oncology 43.3 (2013): 765-774.
Chicago
Capodanno, A., Boldrini, L., Proietti, A., Alì, G., Pelliccioni, S., Niccoli, C., D'Incecco, A., Cappuzzo, F., Chella, A., Lucchi, M., Mussi, A., Fontanini, G."Let-7g and miR-21 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological and molecular features". International Journal of Oncology 43, no. 3 (2013): 765-774. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2013.2003