Generation of highly differentiated BHY oral squamous cell carcinoma multicellular spheroids
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 27, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1514
- Pages: 323-325
Abstract
Introduction
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are considered an important tool in cancer research (1–3) and anticancer drug development (2). Owing to intercellular communication and cell-matrix interactions (3–5), multicellular spheroids (MCS) reproduce the in vivo situation more effectively than two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture systems. MCS can be used to evaluate cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, gene expression and metabolism, and the tumour response to radiochemotherapy (4). Moreover, MCS can imitate the biological properties of tumour invasion and micrometastasis (4,6). There are several known techniques for spheroid generation, e.g. hanging drop (7,8). The liquid overlay technique has been described as the most suitable technique for reproducible spheroid preparation (3). On a non-adhesive surface, cells adhere to each other and start forming MCS (5,9,10). The generation of MCS has been described in few moderately- and poorly-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines (11). Although studying the complex tumour characteristics from all the different degrees of malignancy is vital, no previous study demonstrating the MCS formation in a highly differentiated OSCC cell line has been conducted. In the present investigation, using the liquid overlay technique, we generate MCS from highly differentiated OSCC cell line BHY for the first time.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Highly differentiated OSCC cell line BHY was obtained from the German Collection of Cell Cultures and Microorganisms (DSZM, Braunschweig, Germany). Cell line was cultivated in 90% Dulbecco's MEM (4.5 g/l glucose) with 10% h.i. FBS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Tumour doubling time
For calculation of the tumour doubling time, 1,1 million cells were seeded in a 25 cm2 cell culture flask and cell density was counted after 48 and 72 h, respectively.
Spheroid preparation
A total of 50 µl of the agarose solution (0.15 g of agarose mixed with 10 ml of DMEM) were added to each well of a 96-well microtiter plate, and was let to cool down for 30 min. BHY cell suspension was prepared using a trypsin/EDTA solution. Cells were counted in a Neubauer counting chamber.
In independent experiments 5,000, 10,000 and 15,000 cells per well were used. Since the use of 10,000 and 15,000 cells did not result in the formation of single compact spheroids, only the spheroids with 5,000 initial cells were used for the further studies.
A total of 480,000 cells in 19.2 ml DMEM were used for spheroid initiation. 200 µl of cell suspension was transferred to each well of the agarose-coated 96-well microtiter plate (5,000 cells per well). Since no further increase in sizes could be observed, BHY MCS were harvested after 3 days of incubation, using a pasteur pipette. MCS and its supernatant were transferred from each well into a 50-ml falcon tube, where MCS sedimented. DMEM supernatant was removed, and 20 ml of formalin was added for 5 h of fixation. Sediment was transferred into a 0.5 ml e-cup, and embedded with 3% agarose solution. The resulting agarose block was used for paraffin embedding, using the automated embedding workstation Excelsior ES (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). All measurements were performed in three independent experiments. Over all, a total of 32 BHY spheroids were used for further evaluation. Two independent investigators evaluated all tissue sections by using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 plus light microscope (Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany).
Evaluation of spheroid size
MCS size was analysed after 3 days on 2 µm tissue sections. The diameter of each spheroid was measured by using the AxioVision software (version 4.8; Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany). By assuming a spherical shape, the volume of BHY MCS was calculated using the following equation: V=4/3 x π x (d/2)3.
Results
The analysis of the tumour doubling time of monolayer cell culture revealed a doubling time of ~72 h.
Highly differentiated OSCC cell line BHY formed different sized compact MCS within 24 h (Fig. 1). After 48 h, spheroids showed a compact body. After 72 h, no further increase in size could be observed. Spheroid compactness decreased with increasing incubation time over three days.
Diameter of the analysed spheroids ranged from 46,76 µm to 233,26 µm [mean 123.99 µm ±59.44 standard deviation (SD)]. Volume ranged from 5,35x104 µm3 to 6,65x106 µm3 [mean 1.74x106 µm3 ± 2.20 SD] (Table I).
Discussion
In the present investigation, for the first time, we generated reproducible MCS from highly differentiated OSCC cell line BHY by using the liquid overlay technique.
The advantage of the used method lies in its easy practicability compared to other protocols described in the literature that use the Matrigel, Hanging Drops, or doing Ultra-Low Attachment Assays (2,11,12).
Lee and colleagues compared the spheroid formation of four oral cancer cell lines (SCC9, SCC9β6, SCC9β6KDFyn, and SCC9β6D1) using agarose-coated tissue, and let a 0.6% agarose solution dry overnight at room temperature (11). The SCC9β6D1 cell line formed diminutive clusters containing 2–4 cells. In contrast, the SCC9β6KDFyn cell line generated large oversized spheres. The aforementioned method to generate spheroids seems to be very sensitive. In our study, the agarose solution was left to cool down at room temperature for only 30 min. An over-dried agarose solution might have a significant influence on spheroid stability.
The present results are contrary to those described by Adcock and colleagues, who described an increased average spheroid diameter with an increasing initial cell number per well plate, using the CAL-27 cell line from the tongue squamous cell carcinoma (2). While 5,000 BHY cells, resulted in one compact spheroid, adding 10,000 or 15,000 cells to each well plate led to the formation of small aggregates of cells, instead of one compact spheroid in our investigation.
This study shows that it is possible to rapidly generate spheroids with homogeneous size distribution, which is a prerequisite for drug screening (1,10). Within 3 days, BHY MCS grew to 46,76–233,26 µm in diameter. This is comparable to the results presented by Adcock et al, where CAL-27 MCS grew to 50–100 µm in diameter within 3 to 4 days (2). Hagemann et al also showed similar results by generating CAL-27 MCS that reached a diameter of 1–3 mm within 5 days (12).
The harvesting procedure of MCS was a critical step in the present protocol. Contrary to the method used by Gebhard et al, who harvested MCS using a plastic pipette of 2 mm tip diameter and centrifuged them to cell pellets (13), in the present investigation MCS were carefully harvested using a pasteur pipette and were not centrifuged. The use of a plastic pipette and centrifugation disrupted BHY MCS structure in the present investigation.
BHY is a slow-growing (doubling time of ~72 h) cell line, established from the tumour of the lower alveolus of a Japanese male, which was highly invasive towards the mandible and the oral floor (14). It has a stable growth on agarose, which means a reliable measure of the metastatic capability of the cancer cells (15). In the present study, BHY spheroids did not follow the typical growth patterns, with proliferating cells next to the oxygen supply and nutrients, and quiescent and necrotic cells farthest away from the capillaries, as described before (9).
However, a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying tumour resistance to apoptotic cell death is expected to provide the basis for a rational approach to develop molecular targeted therapies (16).
Although BHY is a slow growing, difficult to cultivate highly differentiated OSCC cell line, it forms reproducible compact spheroids on an agarose surface. The generation of MCS using the liquid overlay technique is a simple method that can be used for further cancer research and anticancer drug development.
References
Friedrich J, Seidel C, Ebner R and Kunz-Schughart LA: Spheroid-based drug screen: Considerations and practical approach. Nat Protoc. 4:309–324. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adcock AF, Trivedi G, Edmondson R, Spearman C and Yang L: Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures in cell-based assays for in vitro evaluation of anticancer drugs. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 6:2472015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Metzger W, Sossong D, Bächle A, Pütz N, Wennemuth G, Pohlemann T and Oberringer M: The liquid overlay technique is the key to formation of co-culture spheroids consisting of primary osteoblasts, fibroblasts and endothelial cells. Cytotherapy. 13:1000–1012. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ivascu A and Kubbies M: Rapid generation of single-tumor spheroids for high-throughput cell function and toxicity analysis. J Biomol Screen. 11:922–932. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Santini MT and Rainaldi G: Three-dimensional spheroid model in tumor biology. Pathobiology. 67:148–157. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mueller-Klieser W: Tumor biology and experimental therapeutics. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 36:123–139. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Timmins NE, Dietmair S and Nielsen LK: Hanging-drop multicellular spheroids as a model of tumour angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 7:97–103. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Timmins NE and Nielsen LK: Generation of multicellular tumor spheroids by the hanging-drop method. Methods Mol Med. 140:141–151. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yuhas JM, Li AP, Martinez AO and Ladman AJ: A simplified method for production and growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. Cancer Res. 37:3639–3643. 1977.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kelm JM, Timmins NE, Brown CJ, Fussenegger M and Nielsen LK: Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol Bioeng. 83:173–180. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee C, Lee C, Atakilit A, Siu A and Ramos DM: Differential spheroid formation by oral cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 34:6945–6949. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hagemann J, Jacobi C, Hahn M, Schmid V, Welz C, Schwenk-Zieger S, Stauber R, Baumeister P and Becker S: Spheroid-based 3D cell cultures enable personalized therapy testing and drug discovery in head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res. 37:2201–2210. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gebhard C, Gabriel C and Walter I: Morphological and immunohistochemical characterization of canine osteosarcoma spheroid cell cultures. Anat Histol Embryol. 45:219–230. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kawamata H, Nakashiro K, Uchida D, Harada K, Yoshida H and Sato M: Possible contribution of active MMP2 to lymph-node metastasis and secreted cathepsin L to bone invasion of newly established human oral-squamous-cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer. 70:120–127. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin CJ, Grandis JR, Carey TE, Gollin SM, Whiteside TL, Koch WM, Ferris RL and Lai SY: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines: Established models and rationale for selection. Head Neck. 29:163–188. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fulda S: Tumor resistance to apoptosis. Int J Cancer. 124:511–515. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |