Detection of HPV infection in head and neck cancers: Promise and pitfalls in the last ten years - a meta-analysis
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 22, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2018.1749
- Pages: 17-28
-
Copyright: © Götz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is reportedly the sixth most common cancer diagnosed worldwide; in 2008, ~633,000 new cases were diagnosed, and ~355,000 cases resulted in mortality (1). HNC encompasses all malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract, which begins at the vermilion border of the lips and extends to the beginning of the esophagus. Approximately 90% of malignant neoplasms of the head and neck are squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), while only just >5% are adenocarcinomas (2). The incidence rate varies according to geographic region and associated risk factors of differing severity. In recent decades, a declining incidence rate, particularly for the cancers of the oral cavity, hypopharynx and larynx, has been observed as an effect of reduced tobacco consumption in industrialized countries. However, in contrast, there has been a rapid increase in the incidence rate of oropharyngeal cancers, particularly of those of the tonsils and base of the tongue, which have been associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) (3,4). In 1983, HPV was first reported in association with head and neck SCC (HNSCC) (5). The International Agency for Research on Cancer officially recognized HPV-16 infection as a risk factor for oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC) in 2007 (6). In recent decades, the number of oropharyngeal cancers caused by HPV has risen sharply: From 1988 to 2004, it increased in the US by ≤225% (7). But not only in North America, also in Europe this observation was found (8,9). Of the 100 cancers of the pharynx, 40 are assumed to be associated with HPV (2). HPV-associated HNSCCs occur in different populations from those with cancers induced by noxious agents, and different pathogenic processes underlie their oncogenesis. In the literature, a notable discordance exists among individual studies of HPV-associated HNSCC. Estimates of the incidence rate of HPV-associated tumors also differ greatly. Furthermore, the majority of studies conclude that patients with HPV-associated HNSCC have a survival advantage. An important question regarding the selection of a therapeutic approach in the future is whether treatment that is less intense will be sufficient for HPV-associated tumors.
The objectives of the present study were to improve current understanding concerning: The incidence rate of HPV-associated tumors; the most reliable detection methods; and the survival probability of HPV+ patients.
Materials and methods
Search strategy
The meta-analysis was conducted according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (10,11). For an online literature search, the PubMed database was used. To identify the primary studies, the following terms were combined: ‘HPV’ and ‘HNSCC’, ‘oral cavity’, ‘OPSCC’, ‘oropharyngeal’ or ‘tonsil’ and ‘overall survival’, ‘disease-specific survival’ or ‘treatment modalities’.
Study eligibility and data extraction
The following conditions were defined for the incorporation of studies into the meta-analysis: The object of interest had to be a patient diagnosed with HNSCC; each study had to include at least 50 patients (two exceptions - there have been ≥50 patients, but only 42 respectively 49 were available for HPV testing. These two studies were included because they seemed to be very useful, due to the fact both evaluated many parameters and also considered the kind of treatment.); HPV detection had to be conducted and explained; and the survival rates had to be described and separated into HPV+/HPV− groups. Reviews and previous meta-analyses were not eligible. The publication was not included if it was more than 10 years old (two exceptions) and if it was not written in German or English. Additionally, the publication had to be available as full text. The selected studies were analyzed with respect to the following parameters: Number of patients, HPV detection method and the number of HPV+/HPV− test results, HPV subtypes, tumor localization, treatment, mean age of HPV+/HPV− patients at the time of diagnosis, alcohol consumption of HPV+/HPV− patients, tobacco use of HPV+/HPV− patients, sex of HPV+/HPV− patients, tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) stage, country and outcome. The extracted data were collected in an Excel spreadsheet.
Statistical analysis
In the statistical evaluation, the respective minima, maxima, means and medians were determined for all extracted data sets of the above-mentioned criteria. The statistical analysis of the data to compare the detection methods and the data on the supposed survival advantage was carried out with the support of the staff of the Institute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology of the Technical University of Munich.
For the comparison of the different detection methods the ‘Random-Effect’ model was used and the Risk Difference (RD) with the 95% CI was calculated. After the heterogeneity test, also for the statistical evaluation of the supposed survival advantage, the ‘Random-Effect’ model was used. And by using the published hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) the pooled HR for overall survival (OS) was calculated. For data collection, statistical analysis and the preparation of tables and charts, Microsoft Excel 2011 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and R packages (cran.r-project.org/) were used.
Results
Literature search results
The literature search via PubMed yielded a total of 987 hits. The flow diagram in Fig. 1 illustrates how a final of 139 publications were selected. All abstracts were read to identify useful publications, and duplicates were rejected. In total, 459 publications, which were perceived as helpful, were read as full text. Among the sources of these publications, two further studies (>10 years) were identified to be useful and included in the present meta-analysis. The relevant data were extracted and transferred to an Excel spreadsheet. In 139 publications out of the 461 studies, including a total of 21,774 patients, fulfilled the final criteria. Of these studies, 80 were concerned solely with OPSCC (7,12–90), 13 with oral SCC (OSCC) (91–103) and 31 with both OPSCC and OSCC (104–134); 15 studies provided results on HNSCC in general (135–149).
HPV prevalence
The average percentage of patients tested as HPV+ estimated from all included studies in the meta-analysis was 42.62% [95% CI=0.39–0.46]. The mean incidence rate of the 80 OPSCC studies (12,662 patients, 6,383 HPV+) was 49.85% (95% CI=0.45–0.54). By contrast, for the 13 studies on OSCC, the mean incidence rate was 27.39% (95% CI=0.18–0.36). In a further analysis, anatomic regions were divided more specifically. As the anatomical localization of the oropharynx is of special interest according to HPV positivity, this region was further divided into: Base of the tongue, tonsils and neither of these two locations [listed as other oropharyngeal SCC (OOPSCC) in Table I]. The average incidence rate of HPV+ patients with OPSCC was 50.47% (95% CI=0.47–0.54). Notably, cancers of the base of the tongue, with an average incidence of HPV+ patients of 48.61% (95% CI=0.42–0.56), and of the tonsils, with an average incidence of HPV+ patients of 55.32% (95% CI=0.50–0.61), exhibited a relatively high association with HPV infection in particular. By contrast, oropharyngeal cancer, classified as being outside of these two regions, tested as HPV+ to a much lower extent, with an average incidence of HPV positivity of 26.39% (95% CI=0.22–0.31). The average incidence rates of HPV+ patients with tumors of other head and neck regions excluding OPSCCs were generally below those for oropharyngeal tumors: For OSCC, 24.14% (95% CI=0.18–0.30), for laryngeal cancer, 20.61% (95% CI=0.140.27) and for hypopharyngeal cancer, 22.18% (95% CI=0.14–0.31). For HNSCC, the average incidence of HPV positivity was 32.93% (95% CI=0.27–0.39; Table I).
HPV detection
Of the studies, 95 involved polymerase chain reaction (PCR), 80 used p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 30 studies employed in situ hybridization (ISH). A total of 79 studies determined HPV status with one detection method, while 60 studies used two, or all three, of the above methods. Evaluation of the different results regarding the incidence rates, if studies have used multiple detection methods, revealed no significant difference between PCR and IHC, ISH and PCR, and IHC and ISH (Fig. 2A-C).
HPV subtypes
A total of 80 studies (11,455 patients) provided information on the HPV subtypes. Among the 4,086 patients that tested HPV+, the two high-risk types HPV16 and 18 were the most frequently detected subtypes. In OPSCC (44 studies), HPV16 was detected on average in 90.55% (95% CI=0.87–0.94) of cases, and HPV18 was responsible for the infection on average in 8.10% (95% CI=0.05–0.11) of cases. Among the HPV-associated OSCC cases (10 studies), HPV16 and 18 were detected on average in 69.66% (95% CI=0.52–0.87) and 26% (95% CI=0.19–0.33) of the cases, respectively.
Associations with HPV profile
Data regarding other risk factors (age, TNM status, alcohol and tobacco consumption, sex) and differences between HPV+/− cases are summarized in Fig. 3. The most interesting finding was, that HPV+ patients with OPSCC were often described to be younger than HPV− patients, also the mean age was lower for HPV+ patients with OPSCC (56.5 vs. 60.8 years). But this fact could not be observed for HPV+/− patients with OSCC. Distribution of the studies according to the various countries and the mean incidence rates for OPSCC according to country are also given in Fig. 3.
HPV and patient survival
In the 135 studies providing information on patient survival, 94 reported an improved outcome for patients who tested HPV+, 5 documented a poorer survival rate, 25 could not detect any significant difference, and 11 reported a higher probability of survival only with HPV+ oropharyngeal tumors. Out of the 135 studies, 77 focused on oropharyngeal tumors with information on survival; 67 of these reported of an improved outcome in HPV+ patients, and 10 could not detect a significant difference. Of the 12 studies on OSCC with data on survival rates, 3 reported an improved outcome in HPV+ patients, 3 a poorer outcome, and 6 could not detect a significant difference. The data on the probability of survival were described in various formats, with the largest amount of comparable data being available for overall survival. The pooled adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for OPSCC was 0.31 (95% CI=0.27–0.36). Unfortunately, only 3 equivalent studies were available for nonoropharyngeal tumors, for which the pooled adjusted HR was 1 (95% CI=0.73–1.36, Fig. 4A and B).
Discussion
In the literature, the way in which prevalence rates of HPV-associated HNSCC are described varies greatly, with the main variant factors being insufficient description and fractionation of anatomical localizations, different risk factors (attributable to the time-point and the place of study), and non-uniform detection methods. In the present meta-analysis, the average incidence rate of HPV-associated HNSCC was 42.62%. In a similar meta-analysis of 60 studies (5,046 patients), the average incidence rate was 25.9% (95% CI=0.25–0.27) (150). Another meta-analysis of 34 studies (5,681 patients) reported that 21.95% (95% CI=0.21–0.23) of HNSCCs were associated with HPV (151). The significantly higher incidence rate in the present analysis may be attributable either to i) more than half of the included studies (80 studies, 12,662 patients) only investigating OPSCC, which is known to be more frequently associated with HPV (150); ii) studies older than 10 years not being included. Analysis of the 5% of studies with the highest/lowest incidence rates of HPV-associated HNSCC revealed notable similarities: In contrast to the studies with low incidence rates, most studies with high incidence rates were from North America and involved exclusively OPSCC (15,28,31,46,49,54,79,94,97,100,112,120,136,140). The average prevalence rate in the 110 studies (14,230 patients) that provided data on tumors of the oropharynx was 50.47%; in the two meta-analyses mentioned above, the average incidence rate of HPV-associated OPSCC was 35.6% (95% CI=0.33–0.39) (150) and 41% (95% CI=0.38–0.44), respectively (151). Again, the different time periods over which the studies were conducted may be responsible for the observed differences. Many studies have reported a dramatic increase in the incidence of HPV-associated OPSCC in recent decades (8,9). However, even among the HPV-associated OPSCC cases, a relatively high level of variation exists in incidence rate (minimum: 11.54%, maximum: 89.20%) (28,49). Furthermore, analysis of the 5% of OPSCC studies with the highest/lowest incidence rates of HPV-association determined some similarities: All of the 5% of studies with the highest incidence rates were conducted in North America, whereas none of the studies with the lowest incidence rates was conducted in North America (15,22,28,31,41,49,54,73). The studies with the low incidence rates of HPV-associated HNSCC mentioned the different geographic regions (41,73), the higher prevalence of ‘classic’ risk factors and therefore a lower HPV prevalence (22,41,73), and the data collection over many years (28,73) as possible causes of the low incidence rates of HPV-associated HNSCC.
In the present analysis, OPSCCs were further divided into groups. Notably, a significantly higher HPV association for cancers of the tonsils and base of the tongue was observed, in contrast to cancers of other oropharyngeal regions. The average incidence rate of HPV-associated tumors (3,550 patients) of the 40 studies on OSCC was 24.14%, and therefore was similar to that determined in the meta-analysis by Kreimer: 23.5% (95% CI=0.22–0.25) (150). The current meta-analysis highlights the importance of a detailed description and distinction of the relevant anatomical localizations, since different HPV infection rates are obvious (8,52,53). As another factor, the time of the study appears to influence the HPV incidence rate (8,9); this may be explained by the significant decrease in smoking populations over the past decades (152). Due to the elimination of ‘classic risk factors’, including smoking and alcohol abuse, the number of cancers associated with other possible triggers increases. However, an increased HPV prevalence is also likely to serve a role; this may be attributable to changes in sexual practices and potential transmission via oral sex (24).
The lack of uniform standards for HPV detection makes it difficult to compare individual studies. Each detection method has its own advantages and disadvantages: In addition to sensitivity and specificity, the type of histological specimen, financial aspects, time available, and personal and equipment resources affect the choice of detection. Due to the various advantages and disadvantages, the most reliable HPV detection method may be a combined approach that establishes both an accurate result and a cost- and time-effective test method; for instance, the high sensitivity method of p16 IHC may be combined with the high specificity method of PCR and a chip system as described previously (153). The current analysis compared the results of the various detection methods, but no significant difference was observed. There is an urgent need for uniform standards regarding the HPV test procedure. However, the test method combination described above must first be confirmed as sufficiently accurate. Furthermore, the potential association between viral biological activity/integration into the host genome/higher viral load and higher survival rate must be clarified.
HPV16 and 18 were the most commonly detected subtypes (11,455 patients in 80 studies on subtype), with this result being consistent with other studies (150,151). Notably, HPV16 was more common in OPSCC than in OSCC (90.55 vs. 69.66%), and HPV18 was more often detected in OSCC than in OPSCC (26.00 vs. 8.10%). These observations have previously been described in other studies (8,150).
As mentioned above, the majority of studies observed a survival advantage for HPV+ HNSCC patients. It needs to be clarified whether all HPV-associated HNSCCs have this prognostic advantage, or whether only certain subsets of HPV-associated HNSCC are affected. Not only the anatomical sub-localizations but also the HPV detection method, the respective HPV subtype, the biological activity and the viral load may limit the extent of potential survival benefit. To avoid insufficient treatment, it needs to be examined more closely whether the survival benefit is independent of the applied treatment. A comparison of the individual studies is difficult, because they differ in certain key points including tumor localization, HPV detection method, the applied treatment and the endpoint of study. In concordance with other studies, a survival advantage of a 69% lower risk of fatality associated with any cause was observed for patients with HPV-associated OPSCC. For patients with non-oropharyngeal cancers, no survival benefit was identified, although only 3 comparable studies have been conducted. Many studies suggest that not all HPV-associated HNSCC have an improved prognosis, and that the anatomical localization is of prognostic importance (128,154). Also a recent study conducted at the TU Munich found no survival benefit for patients with HPV-associated OSCC (155). Among the above-mentioned five studies (HPV and patient survival) that reported of a worse outcome of patients with HPV-associated carcinomas, mainly patients with non-OPSCC were investigated (92,96,98,110,126). An interesting study by Marklund indicated that perhaps even the localization of ‘oropharynx’ is too vague, as for neither p16+ nor HPV+ patients with oropharyngeal tumors outside the tonsils and base of the tongue could prognostic benefits be observed (53). Furthermore, in another study, the survival advantage of HPV-associated OPSCC was limited to tumors of the tonsils and base of the tongue (52). Therefore, in future, the description and separation of OPSCC should be more detailed. The reason for HPV-associated cancers having an improved long-term prognosis is still not wholly clear, although several theories have been proposed. The favorable prognosis may be based on the fact that HPV-associated carcinomas have markedly fewer genetic alterations compared with carcinomas induced through noxious agents (44), and thus, an increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging processes exists (156). This observation is also in accordance with the fact that, among patients with HPV-associated cancers, fewer smokers are observed; as the probability of genetic alterations rises with each additional pack year (13). Additionally, this hypothesis is supported by the finding that HPV+ tumors with TP53 mutations have not been associated with an improved prognosis (48,157). No conclusion can be made as to whether the improved prognosis for surgically treated patients is invalid because of the small number of cases. Just as TP53 mutations can be observed less frequently in HPV-associated carcinomas (158), other relationships with specific biomarkers have been discussed, for example, the lower expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and a rarer amplification at 11q13 (159). Furthermore, combined effects of the immune response to the virus and the tumor may be responsible; specific T-cells against HPV16 E7 protein have been detected, but their role remains unclear (160). The fact that patients with HPV-associated HNSCC rarely develop secondary tumors may contribute to improved survival rates (161), although it should be noted that patients affected by HPV-associated cancers are mostly younger (13,88,139,162–165) and are less often tobacco and alcohol consumers (87,116). Certain studies claim that tobacco consumption is of prognostic significance in HPV+ and HPV− patients (13,32,33,54). However, some other studies refute this thesis, claiming the improved prognosis observed in HPV+ patients is independent of their tobacco consumption (26). Regarding comorbidities, for patients with HPV+ OPSCC and, in general, HNSCC with lower comorbidities, a significantly improved long-term survival has been observed (104). In contrast, for patients with HPV-associated OPSCC/HNSCC with higher comorbidities, no prognostic benefit has been recognized (104). This suggests that the health status of the patients should be considered (104). With respect to the detection methods, as explained above, the examination of HPV status with a combined method utilizing p16 IHC, PCR and chip analysis may be advantageous (153). However, the molecular mechanisms that underlie the presumed survival advantage have not yet been sufficiently studied. Thus, no definitive recommendations can be made for HPV detection, and further studies are still needed. Additional tests, including for TP53 mutations, amplification at 11q13, and E6 and E7 PCR may be helpful (154). In addition to the previously described factors that may influence the prognostic relevance of HPV-associated HNSCC, one important question is whether the supposed improved outcome is independent of the treatment method employed. An improved response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been discussed, but even for this there is disagreement; p16+ patients often underwent a more aggressive adjuvant therapy, because of their more frequent lymph node involvement and lower rate of comorbidities (14). This raises the question as to whether the prognostic benefits are attributable to the more intense treatment and not to the less aggressive tumors (14). Baumeister et al (14) also indicated that the most common causes of mortality in patients with HPV-associated carcinomas were distant metastases and the relatively late tumor onset; thus a 10-year monitoring period was suggested to be advantageous.
Regarding published studies on HPV infection in HNSCC, it should be noted that the detection methods and study cohorts may provide bias. Furthermore, the role of HPV infection in OSCC is of minor relevance, and only a minority of cases are HPV+. In OPSCC, and particularly in cancers of the tonsils and base of the tongue, HPV infection and positivity for the surrogate marker p16 may be of high relevance for survival. Therefore, p16-positivity is included in the recent World Health organization TNM classification for OPSCC. In the next few years, the predicted rising numbers of vaccination against HPV infection may serve a notable role regarding the incidence of HPV+ cancers. For details see also ‘Bischof C: PhD Thesis, in prep’.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Lynne Stecher for providing support and helpful contributions to this manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK designed the study. CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK conducted the study. CG and CB collected the data. CG, LS and CB analyzed the data. CG and CB interpreted the data. CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK drafted the manuscript. CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK wrote the manuscript. CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK approved the final version of the manuscript. CG, CB, LS, KDW and AK take responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM: Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International journal of cancer. J Int Cancer. 127:2893–2917. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kaatsch P, Spix C, Katalinic A, Hentschel S, Luttmann S and Stegmaier C: Cancer in Germany 2011/2012. Robert Koch Institute and the Society of Epidemiological Cancer Registries in Germany. Robert-Koch-Institut; Berlin: 2015, (In German). | |
Licitra L, Zigon G, Gatta G, Sanchez MJ and Berrino F: Human papillomavirus in HNSCC: A European epidemiologic perspective. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 22:1143–1153, vii-viii. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Anderson WF and Gillison ML: Incidence trends for human papillomavirus-related and -unrelated oral squamous cell carcinomas in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 26:612–619. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Syrjänen KJ, Pyrhönen S, Syrjänen SM and Lamberg MA: Immunohistochemical demonstration of human papilloma virus (HPV) antigens in oral squamous cell lesions. Br J Oral Surg. 21:147–153. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
World Health Organization; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Human Papillomaviruses. IARc Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 90. IARC; Lyon: pp. 1–636. 2007, PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, Jiang B, Goodman MT, Sibug-Saber M, Cozen W, et al: Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 29:4294–4301. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mehanna H, Beech T, Nicholson T, El-Hariry I, McConkey C, Paleri V and Roberts S: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer-systematic review and meta-analysis of trends by time and region. Head Neck. 35:747–755. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stein AP, Saha S, Yu M, Kimple RJ and Lambert PF: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in the United States across time. Chem Res Toxicol. 27:462–469. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J and Moher D: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 6:e10001002009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moher D1, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J and Altman DG; PRISMA Group, . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 151:264–269. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Al-Swiahb JN, Huang CC, Fang FM, Chuang HC, Huang HY, Luo SD, Chen CH, Chen CM and Chien CY: Prognostic impact of p16, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer in a betel nut-chewing area. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 136:502–508. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF, Westra WH, Chung CH, Jordan RC, Lu C, et al: Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 363:24–35. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baumeister P, Reiter M, Welz C, Becker S, Betz C and Harréus U: Surgically treated oropharyngeal cancer: Risk factors and tumor characteristics. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 140:1011–1019. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bledsoe TJ, Noble AR, Hunter GK, Rybicki LA, Hoschar A, Chute DJ, Saxton JP, Greskovich JF, Adelstein DJ and Koyfman SA: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with known human papillomavirus status treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: Patterns of failure and toxicity outcomes. Radiat Oncol. 8:1742013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bossi P, Orlandi E, Miceli R, Perrone F, Guzzo M, Mariani L, Granata R, Locati L, Fallai C, Cortelazzi B, Pilotti S, et al: Treatment-related outcome of oropharyngeal cancer patients differentiated by HPV dictated risk profile: a tertiary cancer centre series analysis. Ann Oncol. 25:694–699. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Broglie MA, Soltermann A, Rohrbach D, Haile SR, Pawlita M, Studer G, Huber GF, Moch H and Stoeckli SJ: Impact of p16, p53, smoking, and alcohol on survival in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with primary intensity-modulated chemoradiation. Head Neck. 35:1698–1706. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bussu F, Sali M, Gallus R, Petrone G, Zannoni GF, Autorino R, Dinapoli N, Santangelo R, Vellone VG, Graziani C, et al: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in squamous cell carcinomas arising from the oropharynx: Detection of HPV DNA and p16 immunohistochemistry as diagnostic and prognostic indicators-a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 89:1115–1120. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cerezo L, López C, de la Torre A, Suárez D, Hervás A, Ruiz A, Ballestín C, Martín M and Sandoval P: Incidence of human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer and outcomes after chemoradiation in a population of heavy smokers. Head Neck. 36:782–786. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Charfi L, Jouffroy T, de Cremoux P, Le Peltier N, Thioux M, Fréneaux P, Point D, Girod A, Rodriguez J and Sastre-Garau X: Two types of squamous cell carcinoma of the palatine tonsil characterized by distinct etiology, molecular features and outcome. Cancer Lett. 260:72–78. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chernock RD, Zhang Q, El-Mofty SK, Thorstad WL and Lewis JS Jr: Human papillomavirus-related squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: A comparative study in whites and African Americans. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 137:163–169. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chien CY, Su CY, Fang FM, Huang HY, Chuang HC, Chen CM and Huang CC: Lower prevalence but favorable survival for human papillomavirus-related squamous cell carcinoma of tonsil in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 44:174–179. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cohen MA, Weinstein GS, O'Malley BW Jr, Feldman M and Quon H: Transoral robotic surgery and human papillomavirus status: Oncologic results. Head Neck. 33:573–580. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, Pawlita M, Fakhry C, Koch WM, Westra WH and Gillison ML: Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 356:1944–1956. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ernster JA, Sciotto CG, O'Brien MM, Finch JL, Robinson LJ, Willson T and Mathews M: Rising incidence of oropharyngeal cancer and the role of oncogenic human papilloma virus. Laryngoscope. 117:2115–2128. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Evans M, Newcombe R, Fiander A, Powell J, Rolles M, Thavaraj S, Robinson M and Powell N: Human Papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer: An observational study of diagnosis, prevalence and prognosis in a UK population. BMC Cancer. 13:2202013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fakhry C, Zhang Q, Nguyen-Tan PF, Rosenthal D, El-Naggar A, Garden AS, Soulieres D, Trotti A, Avizonis V, Ridge JA, et al: Human papillomavirus and overall survival after progression of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 32:3365–3373. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fallai C, Perrone F, Licitra L, Pilotti S, Locati L, Bossi P, Orlandi E, Palazzi M and Olmi P: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy: Prognostic role of TP53 and HPV status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 75:1053–1059. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fei J, Hong A, Dobbins TA, Jones D, Lee CS, Loo C, Al-Ghamdi M, Harnett GB, Clark J, O'Brien CJ, et al: Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor in squamous cell carcinomas of the tonsil in relation to human papillomavirus status and epidermal growth factor receptor. Ann Surg Oncol. 16:2908–2917. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fischer CA, Kampmann M, Zlobec I, Green E, Tornillo L, Lugli A, Wolfensberger M and Terracciano LM: p16 expression in oropharyngeal cancer: its impact on staging and prognosis compared with the conventional clinical staging parameters. Ann Oncol. 21:1961–1966. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Geiger JL, Lazim AF, Walsh FJ, Foote RL, Moore EJ, Okuno SH, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL, Price DL, Garces YI, et al: Adjuvant chemoradiation therapy with high-dose versus weekly cisplatin for resected, locally-advanced HPV/p16-positive and negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 50:311–318. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gillison ML, Zhang Q, Jordan R, Xiao W, Westra WH, Trotti A, Spencer S, Harris J, Chung CH and Ang KK: Tobacco smoking and increased risk of death and progression for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 30:2102–2111. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hafkamp HC, Manni JJ, Haesevoets A, Voogd AC, Schepers M, Bot FJ, Hopman AH, Ramaekers FC and Speel EJ: Marked differences in survival rate between smokers and nonsmokers with HPV 16-associated tonsillar carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 122:2656–2664. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hama T, Tokumaru Y, Fujii M, Yane K, Okami K, Kato K, Masuda M, Mineta H, Nakashima T, Sugasawa M, et al: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancer: A multicenter study in Japan. Oncology. 87:173–182. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hannisdal K, Schjølberg A, De Angelis PM, Boysen M and Clausen OP: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tonsillar carcinomas are frequent and have a favourable prognosis in males in Norway. Acta Otolaryngol. 130:293–299. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hong A, Dobbins T, Lee CS, Jones D, Jackson E, Clark J, Armstrong B, Harnett G, Milross C, O'Brien C and Rose B: Relationships between epidermal growth factor receptor expression and human papillomavirus status as markers of prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 46:2088–2096. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hong AM, Dobbins TA, Lee CS, Jones D, Harnett GB, Armstrong BK, Clark JR, Milross CG, Kim J, O'Brien CJ, et al: Human papillomavirus predicts outcome in oropharyngeal cancer in patients treated primarily with surgery or radiation therapy. Br J Cancer. 103:1510–1517. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang H, Zhang B, Chen W, Zhou SM, Zhang YX, Gao L, Xu ZG, Qiao YL and Tang PZ: Human papillomavirus infection and prognostic predictors in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 13:891–896. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Isayeva T, Xu J, Dai Q, Whitley AC, Bonner J, Nabell L, Spencer S, Carroll W, Jones G, Ragin C, et al: African Americans with oropharyngeal carcinoma have significantly poorer outcomes despite similar rates of human papillomavirus-mediated carcinogenesis. Hum Pathol. 45:310–319. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Joo YH, Cho KJ, Park JO, Nam IC and Kim MS: Factors influencing the outcomes of primary surgery with postoperative radiotherapy for pN2 oropharyneal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 48:90–94. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jung AC, Briolat J, Millon R, de Reyniès A, Rickman D, Thomas E, Abecassis J, Clavel C and Wasylyk B: Biological and clinical relevance of transcriptionally active human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma. International journal of cancer. Int J Cancer. 126:1882–1894. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Junor E, Kerr G, Oniscu A, Campbell S, Kouzeli I, Gourley C and Cuschieri K: Benefit of chemotherapy as part of treatment for HPV DNA-positive but p16-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Br J Cancer. 106:358–365. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kawakami H, Okamoto I, Terao K, Sakai K, Suzuki M, Ueda S, Tanaka K, Kuwata K, Morita Y, Ono K, et al: Human papillomavirus DNA and p16 expression in Japanese patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2:933–941. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klussmann JP, Mooren JJ, Lehnen M, Claessen SM, Stenner M, Huebbers CU, Weissenborn SJ, Wedemeyer I, Preuss SF, Straetmans JM and Manni JJ: Genetic signatures of HPV-related and unrelated oropharyngeal carcinoma and their prognostic implications. Clin Cancer Res. 15:1779–1786. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuo KT, Hsiao CH, Lin CH, Kuo LT, Huang SH and Lin MC: The biomarkers of human papillomavirus infection in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma-molecular basis and predicting favorable outcome. Mod Pathol. 21:376–386. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lewis JS Jr, Thorstad WL, Chernock RD, Haughey BH, Yip JH, Zhang Q and El-Mofty SK: p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma:an entity with a favorable prognosis regardless of tumor HPV status. Am J Surg Pathol. 34:1088–1096. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li W, Thompson CH, O'Brien CJ, McNeil EB, Scolyer RA, Cossart YE, Veness MJ, Walker DM, Morgan GJ and Rose BR: Human papillomavirus positivity predicts favourable outcome for squamous carcinoma of the tonsil. International journal of cancer. Int J Cancer. 106:553–558. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Licitra L, Perrone F, Bossi P, Suardi S, Mariani L, Artusi R, Oggionni M, Rossini C, Cantù G, Squadrelli M, et al: High-risk human papillomavirus affects prognosis in patients with surgically treated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 24:5630–5636. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin BM, Wang H, D'Souza G, Zhang Z, Fakhry C, Joseph AW, Drake VE, Sanguineti G, Westra WH and Pai SI: Long-term prognosis and risk factors among patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 119:3462–3471. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lindquist D, Ahrlund-Richter A, Tarján M, Tot T and Dalianis T: Intense CD44 expression is a negative prognostic factor in tonsillar and base of tongue cancer. Anticancer Res. 32:153–161. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lindquist D, Romanitan M, Hammarstedt L, Näsman A, Dahlstrand H, Lindholm J, Onelöv L, Ramqvist T, Ye W, Munck-Wikland E, et al: Human papillomavirus is a favourable prognostic factor in tonsillar cancer and its oncogenic role is supported by the expression of E6 and E7. Mol Oncol. 1:350–355. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ljøkjel B, Lybak S, Haave H, Olofsson J, Vintermyr OK and Aarstad HJ: The impact of HPV infection on survival in a geographically defined cohort of oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients in whom surgical treatment has been one main treatment. Acta Otolaryngol. 134:636–645. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marklund L, Näsman A, Ramqvist T, Dalianis T, Munck-Wikland E and Hammarstedt L: Prevalence of human papillomavirus and survival in oropharyngeal cancer other than tonsil or base of tongue cancer. Cancer Med. 1:82–88. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maxwell JH, Kumar B, Feng FY, Worden FP, Lee JS, Eisbruch A, Wolf GT, Prince ME, Moyer JS, Teknos TN, Chepeha DB, et al: Tobacco use in human papillomavirus-positive advanced oropharynx cancer patients related to increased risk of distant metastases and tumor recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 16:1226–1235. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Melkane AE, Auperin A, Saulnier P, Lacroix L, Vielh P, Casiraghi O, Msakni I, Drusch F and Temam S: Human papillomavirus prevalence and prognostic implication in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Head Neck. 36:257–265. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mizumachi T, Kano S, Sakashita T, Hatakeyama H, Suzuki S, Homma A, Oridate N and Fukuda S: Improved survival of Japanese patients with human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 18:824–828. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Näsman A, Nordfors C, Grün N, Munck-Wikland E, Ramqvist T, Marklund L, Lindquist D and Dalianis T: Absent/weak CD44 intensity and positive human papillomavirus (HPV) status in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma indicates a very high survival. Cancer Med. 2:507–518. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nichols AC, Dhaliwal SS, Palma DA, Basmaji J, Chapeskie C, Dowthwaite S, Franklin JH, Fung K, Kwan K, Wehrli B, et al: Does HPV type affect outcome in oropharyngeal cancer? J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 42(9)2013. | |
Nichols AC, Palma DA, Dhaliwal SS, Tan S, Theuer J, Chow W, Rajakumar C, Um S, Mundi N, Berk S, et al: The epidemic of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer in a Canadian population. Curr Oncol. 20:212–219. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nichols AC, Finkelstein DM, Faquin WC, Westra WH, Mroz EA, Kneuertz P, Begum S, Michaud WA, Busse PM, Clark JR and Rocco JW: Bcl2 and human papilloma virus 16 as predictors of outcome following concurrent chemoradiation for advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 16:2138–2146. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Perez-Ordonez B, Massey C, Siu LL, Weinreb I, Hope A, Kim J, Bayley AJ, Cummings B, et al: Outcomes of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients treated by radiotherapy alone using altered fractionation. Radiother Oncol. 103:49–56. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Sullivan B, Huang SH, Siu LL, Waldron J, Zhao H, Perez-Ordonez B, Weinreb I, Kim J, Ringash J, Bayley A, et al: Deintensification candidate subgroups in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal cancer according to minimal risk of distant metastasis. J Clin Oncol. 31:543–550. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oguejiofor KK, Hall JS, Mani N, Douglas C, Slevin NJ, Homer J, Hall G and West CM: The prognostic significance of the biomarker p16 in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 25:630–638. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park K, Cho KJ, Lee M, Yoon DH, Kim J, Kim SY, Nam SY, Choi SH, Roh JL, Han MW, et al: p16 immunohistochemistry alone is a better prognosticator in tonsil cancer than human papillomavirus in situ hybridization with or without p16 immunohistochemistry. Acta Otolaryngol. 133:297–304. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park WS, Ryu J, Cho KH, Choi MK, Moon SH, Yun T, Chun BS, Lee GK, Ahn HJ, Lee JH, et al: Human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in Korea: Use of G1 cycle markers as new prognosticators. Head Neck. 34:1408–1417. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Posner MR, Lorch JH, Goloubeva O, Tan M, Schumaker LM, Sarlis NJ, Haddad RI and Cullen KJ: Survival and human papillomavirus in oropharynx cancer in TAX 324: a subset analysis from an international phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 22:1071–1077. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Psychogios G, Alexiou C, Agaimy A, Brunner K, Koch M, Mantsopoulos K, Tomppert A and Iro H: Epidemiology and survival of HPV-related tonsillar carcinoma. Cancer Med. 3:652–659. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Psychogios G, Mantsopoulos K, Agaimy A, Koch M, Zenk J, Waldfahrer F and Iro H: Prognostic factors in limited (T1-2, N0-1) oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with surgery ± adjuvant therapy. Head Neck. 35:1752–1758. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rahmati R, Dogan S, Pyke O, Palmer F, Awad M, Lee N, Kraus DH, Shah JP, Patel SG and Ganly I: Squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil managed by conventional surgery and postoperative radiation. Head Neck. 37:800–807. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reimers N, Kasper HU, Weissenborn SJ, Stützer H, Preuss SF, Hoffmann TK, Speel EJ, Dienes HP, Pfister HJ, Guntinas-Lichius O and Klussmann JP: Combined analysis of HPV-DNA, p16 and EGFR expression to predict prognosis in oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Cancer. 120:1731–1738. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rietbergen MM, Brakenhoff RH, Bloemena E, Witte BI, Snijders PJ, Heideman DA, Boon D, Koljenovic S, Baatenburg-de Jong RJ and Leemans CR: Human papillomavirus detection and comorbidity: critical issues in selection of patients with oropharyngeal cancer for treatment De-escalation trials. Ann Oncol. 24:2740–2745. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rischin D, Young RJ, Fisher R, Fox SB, Le QT, Peters LJ, Solomon B, Choi J, O'Sullivan B, Kenny LM, et al: Prognostic significance of p16INK4A and human papillomavirus in patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated on TROG 02.02 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 28:4142–4148. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodrigo JP, Heideman DA, García-Pedrero JM, Fresno MF, Brakenhoff RH, Díaz Molina JP, Snijders PJ and Hermsen MA: Time trends in the prevalence of HPV in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas in northern Spain (1990–2009). Int J Cancer. 134:487–492. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schache AG, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Liloglou T, Risk JM, Filia A, Jones TM, Sheard J, Woolgar JA, Helliwell TR, Triantafyllou A, Robinson M, Sloan P, et al: Evaluation of human papilloma virus diagnostic testing in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic discrimination. Clin Cancer Res. 17:6262–6271. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sedaghat AR, Zhang Z, Begum S, Palermo R, Best S, Ulmer KM, Levine M, Zinreich E, Messing BP, Gold D, et al: Prognostic significance of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 119:1542–1549. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Semrau R, Duerbaum H, Temming S, Huebbers C, Stenner M, Drebber U, Klussmann JP, Müller RP and Preuss SF: Prognostic impact of human papillomavirus status, survivin, and epidermal growth factor receptor expression on survival in patients treated with radiochemotherapy for very advanced nonresectable oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 35:1339–1344. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi W, Kato H, Perez-Ordonez B, Pintilie M, Huang S, Hui A, O'Sullivan B, Waldron J, Cummings B, Kim J, et al: Comparative prognostic value of HPV16 E6 mRNA compared with in situ hybridization for human oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 27:6213–6221. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song JS, Kim MS, Park JW, Lee YS and Kang CS: Expression of human papillomavirus-related proteins and its clinical implication in tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma. Korean J Pathol. 46:177–186. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song X, Sturgis EM, Huang Z, Li X, Li C, Wei Q and Li G: Potentially functional variants of p14ARF are associated with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients and survival after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Carcinogenesis. 35:62–68. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Straetmans JM, Olthof N, Mooren JJ, de Jong J, Speel EJ and Kremer B: Human papillomavirus reduces the prognostic value of nodal involvement in tonsillar squamous cell carcinomas. Laryngoscope. 119:1951–1957. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tural D, Eliçin O, Batur S, Arslan D, Öz B, Serdengeçti S and Uzel Ö: Human papillomavirus is independent prognostic factor on outcome of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 34:3363–3369. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ukpo OC, Flanagan JJ, Ma XJ, Luo Y, Thorstad WL and Lewis JS Jr: High-risk human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA detection by a novel in situ hybridization assay strongly correlates with p16 expression and patient outcomes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 35:1343–1350. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ukpo OC, Pritchett CV, Lewis JE, Weaver AL, Smith DI and Moore EJ: Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: Primary tumor burden and survival in surgical patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 118:368–373. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ward MJ, Mellows T, Harris S, Webb A, Patel NN, Cox HJ, Piper K, Ottensmeier CH, Thomas GJ and King EV: Staging and treatment of oropharyngeal cancer in the human papillomavirus era. Head Neck. 37:1002–1013. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ward MJ, Thirdborough SM, Mellows T, Riley C, Harris S, Suchak K, Webb A, Hampton C, Patel NN, Randall CJ, et al: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes predict for outcome in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Cancer. 110:489–500. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weinberger PM, Merkley MA, Khichi SS, Lee JR, Psyrri A, Jackson LL and Dynan WS: Human papillomavirus-active head and neck cancer and ethnic health disparities. Laryngoscope. 120:1531–1537. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weinberger PM, Yu Z, Haffty BG, Kowalski D, Harigopal M, Brandsma J, Sasaki C, Joe J, Camp RL, Rimm DL, et al: Molecular classification identifies a subset of human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancers with favorable prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 24:736–747. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Worden FP, Kumar B, Lee JS, Wolf GT, Cordell KG, Taylor JM, Urba SG, Eisbruch A, Teknos TN, Chepeha DB, et al: Chemoselection as a strategy for organ preservation in advanced oropharynx cancer: Response and survival positively associated with HPV16 copy number. J Clin Oncol. 26:3138–3146. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Worsham MJ1, Stephen JK, Chen KM, Mahan M, Schweitzer V, Havard S and Divine G: Improved survival with HPV among African Americans with oropharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 19:2486–2492. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Young RJ, Rischin D, Fisher R, McArthur GA, Fox SB, Peters LJ, Corry J, Lim A, Waldeck K and Solomon B: Relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor status, p16(INK4A), and outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 20:1230–1237. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen YW, Kao SY and Yang MH: Analysis of p16(INK4A) expression of oral squamous cell carcinomas in Taiwan: Prognostic correlation without relevance to betel quid consumption. J Surg Oncol. 106:149–154. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duray A, Descamps G, Decaestecker C, Remmelink M, Sirtaine N, Lechien J, Ernoux-Neufcoeur P, Bletard N, Somja J, Depuydt CE, et al: Human papillomavirus DNA strongly correlates with a poorer prognosis in oral cavity carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 122:1558–1565. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Elango KJ, Suresh A, Erode EM, Subhadradevi L, Ravindran HK, Iyer SK, Iyer SK and Kuriakose MA: Role of human papilloma virus in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 12:889–896. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gröbe A, Hanken H, Kluwe L, Schöllchen M, Tribius S, Pohlenz P, Clauditz T, Grob T, Simon R, Sauter G, Heiland M and Blessmann M: Immunohistochemical analysis of p16 expression, HPV infection and its prognostic utility in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med. 42:676–681. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang SF, Li HF, Liao CT, Wang HM, Chen IH, Chang JT, Chen YJ and Cheng AJ: Association of HPV infections with second primary tumors in early-staged oral cavity cancer. Oral Dis. 18:809–815. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kozomara R, Jović N, Magić Z, Branković-Magić M and Minić V: p53 mutations and human papillomavirus infection in oral squamous cell carcinomas: correlation with overall survival. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 33:342–348. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kruger M, Pabst AM, Walter C, Sagheb K, Günther C, Blatt S, Weise K, Al-Nawas B and Ziebart T: The prevalence of human papilloma virus (HPV) infections in oral squamous cell carcinomas: A retrospective analysis of 88 patients and literature overview. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 42:1506–1514. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee LA, Huang CG, Liao CT, Lee LY, Hsueh C, Chen TC, Lin CY, Fan KH, Wang HM, Huang SF, et al: Human papillomavirus-16 infection in advanced oral cavity cancer patients is related to an increased risk of distant metastases and poor survival. PLoS One. 7:e407672012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee LA, Huang CG, Tsao KC, Liao CT, Kang CJ, Chang KP, Huang SF, Chen IH, Fang TJ, Li HY, Yang SL, et al: Increasing rates of low-risk human papillomavirus infections in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: association with clinical outcomes. J Clin Virol. 57:331–337. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Na II, Kang HJ, Cho SY, Koh JS, Lee JK, Lee BC, Lee GH, Lee YS, Yoo HJ, Ryoo BY, Yang SH and Shim YS: EGFR mutations and human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and tonsil. Eur J Cancer. 43:520–526. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reuschenbach M, Kansy K, Garbe K, Vinokurova S, Flechtenmacher C, Toth C, Prigge ES, Thiele OC, Reinert S, Hoffmann J, et al: Lack of evidence of human papillomavirus-induced squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity in southern Germany. Oral Oncol. 49:937–942. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sugiyama M, Bhawal UK, Kawamura M, Ishioka Y, Shigeishi H, Higashikawa K and Kamata N: Human papillomavirus-16 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Clinical correlates and 5-year survival. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 45:116–122. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao D, Xu QG, Chen XM and Fan MW: Human papillomavirus as an independent predictor in oral squamous cell cancer. Int J Oral Sci. 1:119–125. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ankola AA, Smith RV, Burk RD, Prystowsky MB, Sarta C and Schlecht NF: Comorbidity, human papillomavirus infection and head and neck cancer survival in an ethnically diverse population. Oral Oncol. 49:911–917. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Annertz K, Rosenquist K, Andersson G, Jacobsson H, Hansson BG and Wennerberg J: High-risk HPV and survival in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma - 5-year follow up of a population-based study. Acta Otolaryngol. 134:843–851. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Badaracco G, Rizzo C, Mafera B, Pichi B, Giannarelli D, Rahimi SS, Vigili MG and Venuti A: Molecular analyses and prognostic relevance of HPV in head and neck tumours. Oncol Rep. 17:931–939. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Báez A, Almodóvar JI, Cantor A, Celestin F, Cruz-Cruz L, Fonseca S, Trinidad-Pinedo J and Vega W: High frequency of HPV16-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the Puerto Rican population. Head Neck. 26:778–784. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng Z, Hasegawa M, Aoki K, Matayoshi S, Kiyuna A, Yamashita Y, Uehara T, Agena S, Maeda H, Xie M, et al: A comprehensive evaluation of human papillomavirus positive status and p16INK4a overexpression as a prognostic biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 45:67–76. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng Z, Hasegawa M, Yamashita Y, Matayoshi S, Kiyuna A, Agena S, Uehara T, Maeda H and Suzuki M: Prognostic value of human papillomavirus and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 103:2127–2134. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Duray A, Descamps G, Decaestecker C, Sirtaine N, Gilles A, Khalifé M, Chantrain G, Depuydt CE, Delvenne P and Saussez S: Human papillomavirus predicts the outcome following concomitant chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncol Rep. 30:371–376. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fischer CA, Zlobec I, Green E, Probst S, Storck C, Lugli A, Tornillo L, Wolfensberger M and Terracciano LM: Is the improved prognosis of p16 positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma dependent of the treatment modality? Int J Cancer. 126:1256–1262. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gavid M, Pillet S, Pozzetto B, Oriol M, Dumollard JM, Timoshenko AP, Martin C and Prades JM: Human papillomavirus and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in the South-East of France: Prevalence, viral expression, and prognostic implications. Acta Otolaryngol. 133:538–543. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffmann M, Görögh T, Gottschlich S, Lohrey C, Rittgen W, Ambrosch P, Schwarz E and Kahn T: Human papillomaviruses in head and neck cancer: 8 year-survival-analysis of 73 patients. Cancer Lett. 218:199–206. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Joo YH, Jung CK, Sun DI, Park JO, Cho KJ and Kim MS: High-risk human papillomavirus and cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 34:10–14. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klozar J, Koslabova E, Kratochvil V, Salakova M and Tachezy R: Nodal status is not a prognostic factor in patients with HPV-positive oral/oropharyngeal tumors. J Surg Oncol. 107:625–633. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klozar J, Kratochvil V, Salakova M, Smahelova J, Vesela E, Hamsikova E, Betka J and Tachez R: HPV status and regional metastasis in the prognosis of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 265 Suppl 1:S75–S82. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kong CS, Narasimhan B, Cao H, Kwok S, Erickson JP, Koong A, Pourmand N and Le QT: The relationship between human papillomavirus status and other molecular prognostic markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 74:553–561. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Laco J, Nekvindova J, Novakova V, Celakovsky P, Dolezalova H, Tucek L, Vosmikova H, Vosmik M, Neskudlova T, Cermakova E, et al: Biologic importance and prognostic significance of selected clinicopathological parameters in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, with emphasis on smoking, protein p16(INK4a) expression, and HPV status. Neoplasma. 59:398–408. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lassen P, Eriksen JG, Krogdahl A, Therkildsen MH, Ulhøi BP, Overgaard M, Specht L, Andersen E, Johansen J, Andersen LJ, et al; Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA), . The influence of HPV-associated p16-expression on accelerated fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: Evaluation of the randomised DAHANCA 6&7 trial. Radiother Oncol. 100:49–55. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
López RV, Levi JE, Eluf-Neto J, Koifman RJ, Koifman S, Curado MP, Michaluart-Junior P, Figueiredo DL, Saggioro FP, de Carvalho MB, et al: Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and the prognosis of head and neck cancer in a geographical region with a low prevalence of HPV infection. Cancer Causes Control. 25:461–471. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lukesova E, Boucek J, Rotnaglova E, Salakova M, Koslabova E, Grega M, Eckschlager T, Rihova B, Prochazka B, Klozar J, et al: High level of Tregs is a positive prognostic marker in patients with HPV-positive oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas. BioMed Res Int. 2014:3039292014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rades D, Seibold ND, Gebhard MP, Noack F, Schild SE and Thorns C: Prognostic factors (including HPV status) for irradiation of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Strahlenther Onkol. 187:626–632. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rautava J, Kuuskoski J, Syrjanen K, Grenman R and Syrjanen S: HPV genotypes and their prognostic significance in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. J Clin Virol. 53:116–120. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ritchie JM, Smith EM, Summersgill KF, Hoffman HT, Wang D, Klussmann JP, Turek LP and Haugen TH: Human papillomavirus infection as a prognostic factor in carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Int J Cancer. 104:336–344. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rittà M, De Andrea M, Mondini M, Mazibrada J, Giordano C, Pecorari G, Garzaro M, Landolfo V, Schena M, Chiusa L, et al: Cell cycle and viral and immunologic profiles of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as predictable variables of tumor progression. Head Neck. 31:318–327. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rosenquist K, Wennerberg J, Annertz K, Schildt EB, Hansson BG, Bladström A and Andersson G: Recurrence in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Human papillomavirus and other risk factors. Acta Otolaryngol. 127:980–987. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Salazar CR, Anayannis N, Smith RV, Wang Y, Haigentz M Jr, Garg M, Schiff BA, Kawachi N, Elman J, Belbin TJ, Prystowsky MB, Burk RD and Schlecht NF: Combined P16 and human papillomavirus testing predicts head and neck cancer survival. Int J Cancer. 135:2404–2412. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Salazar CR, Smith RV, Garg MK, Haigentz M Jr, Schiff BA, Kawachi N, Anayannis N, Belbin TJ, Prystowsky MB, Burk RD, et al: Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma survival: A comparison by tumor site and initial treatment. Head Neck Pathol. 8:77–87. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Settle K, Posner MR, Schumaker LM, Tan M, Suntharalingam M, Goloubeva O, Strome SE, Haddad RI, Patel SS, Cambell EV III, et al: Racial survival disparity in head and neck cancer results from low prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in black oropharyngeal cancer patients. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2:776–781. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith EM, Rubenstein LM, Haugen TH, Pawlita M and Turek LP: Complex etiology underlies risk and survival in head and neck cancer human papillomavirus, tobacco, and alcohol: A case for multifactor disease. J Oncol. 2012:5718622012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith EM, Rubenstein LM, Hoffman H, Haugen TH and Turek LP: Human papillomavirus, p16 and p53 expression associated with survival of head and neck cancer. Infect Agent Cancer. 5:42010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith EM, Wang D, Rubenstein LM, Morris WA, Turek LP and Haugen TH: Association between p53 and human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 17:421–427. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stephen JK, Divine G, Chen KM, Chitale D, Havard S and Worsham MJ: Significance of p16 in Site-specific HPV Positive and HPV Negative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Clin Oncol. 2:51–61. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Thibaudeau E, Fortin B, Coutlée F, Nguyen-Tan P, Weng X, Audet ML, Abboud O, Guertin L, Christopoulos A, Tabet J, et al: HPV prevalence and prognostic value in a prospective cohort of 255 patients with locally advanced HNSCC: A single-centre experience. Int J Otolaryngol. 2013:4378152013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Alos L, Moyano S, Nadal A, Alobid I, Blanch JL, Ayala E, Lloveras B, Quint W, Cardesa A and Ordi J: Human papillomaviruses are identified in a subgroup of sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas with favorable outcome. Cancer. 115:2701–2709. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ernoux-Neufcoeur P, Arafa M, Decaestecker C, Duray A, Remmelink M, Leroy X, Herfs M, Somja J, Depuydt CE, Delvenne P, et al: Combined analysis of HPV DNA, p16, p21 and p53 to predict prognosis in patients with stage IV hypopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 137:173–181. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fakhry C, Westra WH, Li S, Cmelak A, Ridge JA, Pinto H, Forastiere A and Gillison ML: Improved survival of patients with human papillomavirus-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a prospective clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 100:261–269. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friedland P, Thomas A, Naran A, Amanuel B, Grieu-Iacopetta F, Carrello A, Harnett G, Meyer C and Phillips M: Human papillomavirus and gene mutations in head and neck squamous carcinomas. ANZ J Surg. 82:362–366. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Heath S, Willis V, Allan K, Purdie K, Harwood C, Shields P, Simcock R, Williams T and Gilbert DC: Clinically significant human papilloma virus in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in UK practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 24:e18–23. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Joo YH, Lee YS, Cho KJ, Park JO, Nam IC, Kim CS, Kim SY and Kim MS: Characteristics and prognostic implications of high-risk HPV-associated hypopharyngeal cancers. PLoS One. 8:e787182013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lassen P, Eriksen JG, Hamilton-Dutoit S, Tramm T, Alsner J and Overgaard J: Effect of HPV-associated p16INK4A expression on response to radiotherapy and survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol. 27:1992–1998. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lau HY, Brar S, Klimowicz AC, Petrillo SK, Hao D, Brockton NT, Kong CS, Lees-Miller SP and Magliocco AM: Prognostic significance of p16 in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy. Head Neck. 33:251–256. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rampias T, Pectasides E, Prasad M, Sasaki C, Gouveris P, Dimou A, Kountourakis P, Perisanidis C, Burtness B, Zaramboukas T, Rimm D, et al: Molecular profile of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas bearing p16 high phenotype. Ann Oncol. 24:2124–2131. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sethi S, Ali-Fehmi R, Franceschi S, Struijk L, van Doorn LJ, Quint W, Albashiti B, Ibrahim M and Kato I: Characteristics and survival of head and neck cancer by HPV status: a cancer registry-based study. Int J Cancer. 131:1179–1186. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sivars L, Näsman A, Tertipis N, Vlastos A, Ramqvist T, Dalianis T, Munck-Wikland E and Nordemar S: Human papillomavirus and p53 expression in cancer of unknown primary in the head and neck region in relation to clinical outcome. Cancer Med. 3:376–384. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Śnietura M, Jaworska M, Pigłowski W, Goraj-Zając A, Woźniak G and and Lange D: High-risk HPV DNA status and p16 (INK4a) expression as prognostic markers in patients with squamous cell cancer of oral cavity and oropharynx. Pol J Pathol. 61:133–139. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Stephen JK, Chen KM, Shah V, Havard S, Lu M, Schweitzer VP, Gardner G and Worsham MJ: Human papillomavirus outcomes in an access-to-care laryngeal cancer cohort. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 146:730–738. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tribius S, Hoffmann AS, Bastrop S, Görögh T, Haag J, Röcken C, Clauditz T, Grob T, Wilczak W, Tennstedt P, et al: HPV status in patients with head and neck of carcinoma of unknown primary site: HPV, tobacco smoking, and outcome. Oral Oncol. 48:1178–1184. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weiss D, Koopmann M and Rudack C: Prevalence and impact on clinicopathological characteristics of human papillomavirus-16 DNA in cervical lymph node metastases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck. 33:856–862. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P and Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: A systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 14:467–475. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dayyani F, Etzel CJ, Liu M, Ho CH, Lippman SM and Tsao AS: Meta-analysis of the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) on cancer risk and overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Head Neck Oncol. 2:152010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ng M, Freeman MK, Fleming TD, Robinson M, Dwyer-Lindgren L, Thomson B, Wollum A, Sanman E, Wulf S, Lopez AD, et al: Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. JAMA. 311:183–192. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adelstein DJ, Ridge JA, Gillison ML, Chaturvedi AK, D'Souza G, Gravitt PE, Westra W, Psyrri A, Kast WM, Koutsky LA, Giuliano A, et al: Head and neck squamous cell cancer and the human papillomavirus: summary of a National Cancer Institute State of the Science Meeting, November 9-10, 2008, Washington, D.C. Head Neck. 31:1393–1422. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ragin CC and Taioli E: Survival of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in relation to human papillomavirus infection: review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 121:1813–1820. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Götz C, Drecoll E, Straub M, Bissinger O, Wolff KD and Kolk A: Impact of HPV infection on oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 7:76704–76712. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Butz K, Geisen C, Ullmann A, Spitkovsky D and Hoppe-Seyler F: Cellular responses of HPV-positive cancer cells to genotoxic anti-cancer agents: repression of E6/E7-oncogene expression and induction of apoptosis. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. 68:506–513. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hafkamp HC, Speel EJ, Haesevoets A, et al: A subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas exhibits integration of HPV 16/18 DNA and overexpression of p16INK4A and p53 in the absence of mutations in p53 exons 5-8. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. 107:394–400. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, Zahurak ML, Daniel RW, Viglione M, Symer DE, et al: Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92:709–720. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ragin CC, Taioli E, Weissfeld JL, White JS, Rossie KM, Modugno F and Gollin SM: 11q13 amplification status and human papillomavirus in relation to p16 expression defines two distinct etiologies of head and neck tumours. Br J Cancer. 95:1432–1438. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffmann TK, Arsov C, Schirlau K, Bas M, Friebe-Hoffmann U, Klussmann JP, Scheckenbach K, Balz V, Bier H and Whiteside TL: T cells specific for HPV16 E7 epitopes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Int J Cancer. 118:1984–1991. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaturvedi AK: Epidemiology and clinical aspects of HPV in head and neck cancers. Head Neck Pathol. 6 Suppl 1:S16–S24. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Petrini M, Rittà M, Schena M, Chiusa L, Campisi P, Giordano C, Landolfo V, Pecorari G and Landolfo S: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Role of the human papillomavirus in tumour progression. New Microbiol. 29:25–33. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar B, Cordell KG, Lee JS, Worden FP, Prince ME, Tran HH, Wolf GT, Urba SG, Chepeha DB, Teknos TN, et al: EGFR, p16, HPV Titer, Bcl-xL and p53, sex, and smoking as indicators of response to therapy and survival in oropharyngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 26:3128–3137. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mellin H, Friesland S, Lewensohn R, Dalianis T and Munck-Wikland E: Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in tonsillar cancer: clinical correlates, risk of relapse, and survival. International journal of cancer. Int J Cancer. 89:300–304. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schwartz SR, Yueh B, McDougall JK, Daling JR and Schwartz SM: Human papillomavirus infection and survival in oral squamous cell cancer: a population-based study. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-. Head Neck Surg. 125:1–9. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar |