Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Liming Gan
    • Qiulin Huang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 19, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2019
  • Pages: 525-528
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The misdiagnosis of retroperitoneal teratoma as a gastric stromal tumor is rarely reported. There are numerous abdominal organs, and retroperitoneal tumors are easily concealed by organs situated more anteriorly on the abdomen; therefore, retroperitoneal tumors are easily misdiagnosed as human digestive system tumors by abdominal surgeons. We herein present the case of a 39‑year‑old female patient who was diagnosed with a gastric stromal tumor (GST) on preoperative examination, whereas the postoperative diagnosis was retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma. Such cases are clinically rare. In the present case, the tumor was located in the retroperitoneum, near the lesser gastric curvature, without an obvious gap. The anterior surface of the tumor was concealed by the lesser gastric curvature and did not move significantly with breathing and changes in posture. In such cases, a preoperative misdiagnosis is very likely. The aim of the present study was to improve our understanding of the presentation of retroperitoneal teratomas, thereby gaining more clinical experience and hopefully reducing the rate of misdiagnosis.

Introduction

Teratomas may occur in various parts of the body. They may originate from embryonic and primordial germ cells, embryonic mesenchymal stem cells or embryonic carcinoma cells, and usually contain three embryonic components, which have evolved from the inner, middle and outer primitive embryonic layers (1-3).

Retroperitoneal teratomas are located behind the peritoneum and as such may be obscured by various organs in the abdomen. The majority of patients present with digestive tract symptoms and are easily misdiagnosed. Therefore, retroperitoneal teratoma may be included in the differential diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors and this can be used as a systematic and comprehensive study (4).

The most common method of treatment for retroperitoneal teratomas is surgical. In the present case, surgical resection was performed and the pathological examination revealed a retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma. Retroperitoneal teratomas are mostly benign, but a few are malignant; therefore, regular re-examination is required in order to optimize postoperative recovery and avoid tumor recurrence (5).

The follow-up results of the present case indicate that the current condition was stable and there was no evidence of recurrence; however, it is necessary to determine whether follow-up should be continued for a long period of time according to the patient's recovery. Therefore, it is crucial for physicians to report and share their experience with the treatment of difficult and/or rare cases (6,7).

Case report

A 39-year-old female patient was admitted to the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China with abdominal distension as the main symptom. A laboratory examination revealed mildly elevated levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP; 8.230 ng/ml; normal range, 0.0-7.0 ng/ml), while other routine examinations did not reveal any significant abnormalities. No abdominal abnormalities were observed on physical examination by the abdominal specialist.

An auxiliary examination raised the suspicion of a gastric stromal tumor (GST) by electronic gastroscopy (Fig. 1) and by dual-phase enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the small intestine (Fig. 2).

According to the patient's medical history and preoperative examination, the proximal tumor and lateral protrusion of the lesser curvature of the stomach were considered to be close to the abdominal aorta; thus, endoscopic submucosal dissection was considered as a high-risk surgical procedure. Following completion of the preoperative preparation, laparoscopy-assisted gastric tumor resection was performed. A 2x2-cm large cystic mass was identified intraoperatively, located close to the abdominal aorta and behind the peritoneum of the lesser curvature of the stomach (Fig. 3). The gastric fundus and a bulge of the gastric body were visible during the intraoperative endoscopic examination, and the bulge disappeared when the stomach was lifted; the cystic mass was then completely removed.

Fast frozen biopsy examination revealed that the cyst was 2x1.5x0.3 cm in size, it was filled with mucus, it had a smooth, pale and soft surface, and the cyst wall had a thickness of 0.1-0.2 cm. Thus, this was suspected to be a mature cystic teratoma. No other mass or protuberance was identified on gastroscopy. The results of the postoperative pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma (Fig. 4). Mature cystic teratomas are usually benign and contain several components, including bone, cartilage, teeth, adipose tissue, nerve tissue and other components; in the present case, calcification was also observed (Figs. 2 and 4). The patient was discharged from the hospital without obvious abdominal distension. There was no abdominal distension or other signs or symptoms on the 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Discussion

A teratoma is a tumor derived from germ cells that may contain multiple types of tissue (1-3). It may develop anywhere in the body, but is most commonly encountered as sacrococcygeal, retroperitoneal, ovarian and testicular teratoma. Teratomas may be classified into three main types, namely immature, mature and monoembryonic. Mature retroperitoneal teratomas are mostly benign and malignant, accounting for 26% (8,9). The early symptoms of retroperitoneal teratoma may not be readily evident and are non-specific; thus, they are not easily identifiable and the tumor is often misdiagnosed (10,11). Typically, symptoms become more pronounced when the tumor grows to a large size and compresses adjacent tissues or organs (12,13). However, the tumor in the present case was located in the lesser curvature of the stomach and was compressed, resulting in herniation of the lesser curvature of the stomach near the fundus. Preoperative CT examination and ultrasound gastroscopy did not reveal the presence of a tumor, and the abdominal examination revealed no obvious signs. In addition, such cases are rarely reported clinically. For all these reasons, retroperitoneal teratoma may be easily misdiagnosed as a GST (14). In the present case, the abdominal distension had been present for >10 years, and there was no recurrence on the 6-month postoperative follow-up. The cause of abdominal distension in this patient was considered to be the compression of the lesser gastric curvature by the tumor.

At its early stages, retroperitoneal teratoma often lacks characteristic clinical manifestations (5). CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently the main imaging examinations for the diagnosis of teratomas. CT scans can determine the size, location, integrity, invasion of adjacent tissues and organs, and the presence of lymph node metastasis. An MRI scan not only clearly indicates the structure of the tumors and surrounding soft tissues and blood vessels, but can also reveal multiple organ structures. MRI is often superior to other examinations for preoperative staging of tumors such as rectal cancer, and the localization and qualitative diagnosis of severe abdominal lesions, as it can provide a favorable preoperative basis for selecting the specific surgical treatment plan for the follow-up (15). Moreover, due to the lack of CT three-dimensional images in the present case, the associations of the tumor with the surrounding organs and structures could not be observed from different angles and levels, and the accurate location of the tumor could not be stereoscopically demonstrated, which may also adversely affect the accuracy of the preoperative diagnosis. For intraperitoneal tumors, when a CT scan is not available, it is recommended that an MRI examination be performed to reach a definitive diagnosis. However, in the present case, the tumor was located behind the peritoneum, and was deeply seated and complex. In such cases, a preoperative MRI may not be able to make a definitive diagnosis due to the tumor being concealed by the stomach and other organs situated in front of it. Furthermore, an MRI scan is also associated with certain limitations: A relatively long examination time, a poor dynamic scanning effect of organ enhancement compared with CT, relatively high requirements regarding the patient's cooperation and the poor diagnosis of dehydrated organs and lesions; in addition, some patients, such as those with pacemakers, cannot be subjected to an MRI. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a method of fine-needle puncture biopsy guided by endoscopic ultrasonography for the extraction of cells and tissue fragments for pathological examination, in order to help determine the nature of the lesion. Using this method, the pathological characteristics may be evaluated in detail, and pathological tissues may also be obtained for cytological and immunohistochemical examinations, in order to determine the nature, origin and classification of the lesion (16,17). As a result, the initial treatment regimens often change. For medical units that have developed EUS-FNA technology, EUS-FNA can be improved according to the needs of the patients to further select specific treatment plans. Although EUS-FNA has a number of advantages, it may not be applied in all cases. In the present case, the tumor was close to the abdominal aorta, and it was deep-seated with limited operating field; furthermore, the risk of puncture associated with cystic lesions is higher compared with that for solid lesions. Therefore, in our patient, the preoperative incomplete MRI scan and EUS-FNA may have also contributed to the misdiagnosis.

Surgical resection remains the most effective treatment for retroperitoneal teratomas (18). Laparoscopic teratoma resection is safe and feasible due to its relatively advanced technology, minimal associated trauma, rapid patient recovery and preservation of capsule integrity of the mature cystic teratoma (19,20). The complete resection of benign teratomas may prevent malignant transformation and recurrence (21). If the intraoperative fast frozen biopsy examination indicates malignancy, the surgical resection scope should be expanded. If the intraoperative tumor is found to invade the surrounding tissues or organs, multiple departments can cooperate to carry out multiple organ resection, supplemented by radiotherapy and chemotherapy to improve treatment efficacy (22,23). In the present case, the combined findings of CT and other preoperative examinations could not rule out the possibility of an adrenal tumor, although GST was clinically suspected and despite the fact that there was no history of hypertension. Preoperative and intraoperative blood pressure monitoring revealed stable blood pressure, and an adrenal tumor was thus considered unlikely. However, for patients with irregular preoperative blood pressure, obvious intraoperative blood pressure changes and marked fluctuations, adrenal tumors should be considered in the differential diagnosis, and appropriate preoperative and intraoperative measures should be taken.

A teratoma is a congenital neoplasm originating from germ cells. Therefore, for patients diagnosed with teratoma before or after surgery, an ultrasound examination of the reproductive system should be performed to avoid misdiagnosis. During follow-up in the present case, no reproductive teratoma was identified on gynecological ultrasound examination, although a regular follow-up was still recommended. Laboratory examinations of mature retroperitoneal teratomas are mostly negative. However, the increased levels of AFP, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) may be of value for the diagnosis and prognosis of immature teratomas (24,25). The AFP levels of this patient were mildly elevated, and the result of the pathological examination revealed a mature cystic teratoma. Although there were no obvious indications for radiotherapy and chemotherapy at the time, an abdominal CT examination, and measurement of AFP, CEA and hCG levels should be performed regularly after surgery to prevent tumor recurrence (26,27).

In the present case, the tumors were similar to the gastric fundus of the lesser gastric curvature, with no obvious space between the tumor and the stomach as they are in close proximity, and it was difficult to detect on preoperative examination. Retroperitoneal tumors may be complex, and the tumor in the present case was deep-seated and fixed. The front surface of the tumor was also concealed by the gastric fundus, and there were no obvious changes observed with respiration and change in body position. Moreover, ultrasound gastroscopy, EUS-FNA, B-mode ultrasonography of the abdomen and MRI were not performed prior to surgery, and the histological type of the lesion could not be determined. In addition, this type of clinical case is rare, and the clinician's diagnostic experience was relatively insufficient, which is one of the main reasons for the misdiagnosis.

In conclusion, retroperitoneal teratoma must be included in the differential diagnoses of GST, and may improve comprehensive learning. The aim of the present case report was to improve our current understanding of the clinical presentation of GSTs and retroperitoneal teratomas in order to reduce the likelihood of clinical misdiagnosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the key guiding project of Health and Health Committee of Hunan Province of China (grant no. 20201919 ).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

LG was responsible for the conception, content, image collection and manuscript writing. QH was responsible for providing guidance with manuscript writing, revision and proofreading. Both authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This case study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, University of South China. The patient provided consent for inclusion in this study.

Patient consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication the case details and any associated images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Pandit N, Awale L and Jaiswal LS: Giant calcified retroperitoneal teratoma. Indian J Surg Oncol. 9:436–437. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Huang X, Liu B and Xie L: Giant primary retroperitoneal teratoma in an adult female patient: A case report. Oncol Lett. 6:460–462. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Skinovsky J, Tsumanuma FK, Sigwalt MF, Panegalli-Filho F, Kawakubo AM, Rolim BG and Godoy LA: Thirty kilograms giant retroperitoneal teratoma: Case report. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 29:128–129. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In English).

4 

Huľová S, Aziri R, Chovanec M, Mardiak J, Mego M and Pinďák D: Clinical management and outcome in extreme retroperitoneal growing teratoma syndrome of testicular origin-clinical management and effect of the treatment. Klin Onkol. 32:129–132. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Richie JP: Re: Post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal teratoma in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: Do predictive factors exist? Results from a national multicenter study. J Urol. 199(894)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Chalhoub K, Abou Zahr R, Mansour E, Aoun M and Jabbour M: Primary mature cystic teratoma compressing the prostate in a 28-year-old male: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Urol. 2019(8970172)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Morotti A, Busso M, Consiglio Barozzino M, Cinardo P, Angelino V, Familiari U, Veltri A and Guerrasio A: Detection and management of retroperitoneal cystic lesions: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett. 14:1602–1608. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Cvijanović R, Ivanov D and Zivojinov M: Thoracoabdominal teratoma-rare location. Med Pregl. 64:89–92. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Serbian).

9 

Li S, Liu Z, Dong C, Long F, Liu Q, Sun D, Gao Z and Wang L: Growing teratoma syndrome secondary to ovarian giant immature teratoma in an adolescent girl: A case report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 95(e2647)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Maenosono R, Saito K, Ibuki N, Takahara K, Inamoto T, Nomi H and Azuma H: A case of retroperitoneal teratoma difficult to distinguish from adrenal tumor. Hinyokika Kiyo. 63:525–528. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Japanese).

11 

Tong HX, Liu WS, Jiang Y, Liu JU, Zhou JJ, Zhang Y and Lu WQ: Giant retroperitoneal bronchogenic cyst mimicking a cystic teratoma: A case report. Oncol Lett. 9:2701–2705. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Ma Y, Zheng J, Feng J, Zhu H, Xiao X and Chen L: Ectopic nephrogenic rests in children: A series of 13 cases in a single institution. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 65(e26985)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Lee KH, Song MJ, Jung IC, Lee YS and Park EK: Autoamputation of an ovarian mature cystic teratoma: A case report and a review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 14(217)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Goel S, Aeron R, Goel A and Singhai A: Retroperitoneal teratoma simulating giant adrenal myelolipoma: A diagnostic puzzle. BMJ Case Rep 2017: pii: bcr-2017-221762, 2017.

15 

Cheng W, Qi Y, Wang B, Tian L, Huang W and Chen Y: Characteristics and computed tomography evaluation of primary retroperitoneal tumours: Report of 113 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 99:55–59. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Val-Bernal JF, Martino M, Terán A, Yllera E and Castro-Senosiain B: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of leiomyomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Rev Esp Patol. 52:154–162. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Matsumoto K, Takeda Y, Onoyama T, Kawata S, Kurumi H, Koda H, Yamashita T and Isomoto H: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy-Recent topics and technical tips. World J Clin Cases. 7:1775–1783. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Kriger AG, Berelavichus SV, Son AI, Gorin DS, Ikramov RZ and Kalinin DV: Robot-assisted operations for non-organ retroperitoneal tumors. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 24–28. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Russian).

19 

Lv Z, Bai X, Sheng Q, Liu J and Wu Y: A case report of a giant mature teratoma of the thyroid gland in a young girl. Medicine (Baltimore). 98(e14703)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Li H, Zhao T, Wei Q, Yuan H, Cao D, Shen P, Liu L, Zeng H and Chen N: Laparoscopic resection of a huge mature cystic teratoma of the right adrenal gland through retroperitoneal approach: A case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 13(318)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Jones VS and Burns CR: Operative considerations in pediatric retroperitoneal teratomas-a review. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 23:265–269. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Narasimhan V, Smith M, Claydon M, Wale R and Warrier S: Incidental large retroperitoneal teratoma in a patient with colorectal carcinoma. ANZ J Surg. 88:1350–1352. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kim JH, Lee TS, Oh HK and Choi YS: A case of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising from retroperitoneal teratoma treated with chemoradiation. J Gynecol Oncol. 20:126–128. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Seike T, Kagaya T, Komura T, Nakai R, Shimizu Y, Omura H, Ohta H, Ohyama S, Kawashima A and Unoura M: A rapidly growing, large, mature retroperitoneal teratoma in an adult male patient. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 114:1008–1014. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Japanese).

25 

Sasi W, Ricchetti GA, Parvanta L and Carpenter R: Giant mature primary retroperitoneal teratoma in a young adult: Report of a rare case and literature review. Case Rep Surg. 2014(930538)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Hoang VT, Trinh CT, Le TB and Le TK: Recurrence of retroperitoneal mature cystic teratoma in an adult: A case report. Radiol Case Rep. 14:692–696. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Li J, Gong P, Liu F, Sun P and Wu C: Retroperitoneal cystic immature teratoma: A case report. Oncol Lett. 10:1023–1025. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2020
Volume 12 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2049-9450
Online ISSN:2049-9469

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Gan L and Huang Q: Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report. Mol Clin Oncol 12: 525-528, 2020.
APA
Gan, L., & Huang, Q. (2020). Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report. Molecular and Clinical Oncology, 12, 525-528. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2019
MLA
Gan, L., Huang, Q."Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 12.6 (2020): 525-528.
Chicago
Gan, L., Huang, Q."Retroperitoneal teratoma misdiagnosed as a gastric stromal tumor: A case report". Molecular and Clinical Oncology 12, no. 6 (2020): 525-528. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2019