Sacral and thoracic chordoma with pulmonary metastases: A case report and review of the literature
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 26, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.2179
- Article Number: 17
-
Copyright: © Bai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Chordoma is a rare malignancy with an incidence rate of 0.8-5/100,000 per year (1-4). Chordomas account for 1-4% of all bone malignancies and are predominant in men and in the 50-70 years age group (1,5). Based on histological characteristics, chordomas may be subclassified into the typical, chondroid and dedifferentiated types. Chordomas arise from undifferentiated remnant cells of the embryonal notochord that reside within the axial skeleton (1). Although the mechanism underlying their malignant transformation is largely unclear, mutations in the brachyury gene have been frequently detected in chordoma patients (6). Furthermore, 50-60% of the tumors occur in the sacrococcygeal region, 25-35% at the skull base and 10-15% in the mobile spine (7). The clinical manifestations of chordoma depend on tumor location and invasion, and typically include radiculopathy, deeply localized pain and neurological deficits. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the preferred methods for determining chordoma extension into the bone and adjacent soft tissues. The tumor masses appear as lytic lesions and may contain areas of calcification on CT scans, and as iso- to hypointense on T1-weighted MRI and hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI (1,5). The most effective treatment is surgical excision, although it is technically challenging due to the complex anatomical structure of the affected sites. Therefore, postoperative complications and recurrence are common, and the local recurrence rate is as high as 43-85% (8), whereas only 5% of the tumors metastasize, typically to the lung, bone or brain. Pulmonary metastasis of primary sacral and thoracic chordomas is rare. The aim of the present study was to describe a rare case of sacral and thoracic vertebral chordoma with pulmonary metastasis, and to review the available literature on chordomas of the thoracolumbar spine.
Case report
A 73-year-old man presented at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University in June 2018 with intermittent lumbosacral pain and root pain of the lower limbs, which severely affected his gait and gradually led to difficulty in defecating and urinating. On inspection and palpation, a large soft tissue mass was identified in the lumbosacral area. The patient had been manifesting the symptoms for 8 years, and the lower back pain had progressed in the preceding 2 years. The patient had also undergone rectostomy and indwelling catheterization for incontinence 2 years prior. The preoperative Nurick grade and McCormick score were 3 and II, respectively. Thoracolumbar CT and MRI examinations revealed bone destruction of the right medial wall of the spinal canal and right pedicle of the T11 vertebra, protrusion of the soft tissue mass into the spinal canal, with dural sac compression and shift to the left (Fig. 1). In addition, bone dissolution was observed below the S2 level, along with a 14x13x12.6-cm round soft tissue mass with a clear boundary, and an irregular calcified spot (Fig. 2A-D). Pelvic angiography revealed abundant blood supply to the tumor (Fig. 2E). Furthermore, pulmonary CT scan revealed multiple dense nodules with a smooth border, with a maximum diameter of ~0.95 cm, in both lungs (Fig. 2F). The patient also presented with hypertension, first-degree atrioventricular block and cerebral infarction sequelae. Based on these findings, a diagnostic biopsy was recommended.
Sacral needle biopsy, hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining confirmed the diagnosis of chordoma positive for AE1/AE3, S100 and cytokeratin (CK)8/18 expression (Fig. 3A-C). Accordingly, the tumor mass in the thoracic vertebrae was considered to be metastatic chordoma. However, due to the risk of spinal cord injury, puncture biopsies of the thoracic vertebral tumor were not performed. Posterior laminectomy and tumor curettage were used on the thoracic vertebrae (Fig. 4A and B). On histopathological examination, the T11 vertebral specimen exhibited cytoplasmic vacuolation (Fig. 3D), and was positive for epithelial membrane antigen and CK19 (Fig. 3E and F), and negative for CK7 and chromogranin A expression, findings that were indicative of chordoma.
The posterior median spinous process of the lumbosacral spine (L3-S1, ~20 cm) were removed, and the L4-S1 bilateral lamina, superior and inferior articular processes, bilateral iliac wings and positioning needle were exposed. Four pedicle screws were fastened into both sides of L4 and L5. An inverted ‘Y’ incision was extended to the distal end to reveal the posterior sacrococcyx and sacroiliac joint, and the sacral mass was extensively resected. Two iliac screws were fastened downwards on both sides at the S1 level, and the connecting rods were installed on the left and right sides, followed by locking and fixing the nuts (Fig. 4C-G). The volume of intraoperative blood loss was ~3,000 ml. The patient did not receive any chemotherapy or radiotherapy after surgery, and the pulmonary X-ray at the 24-month follow-up revealed stable disease (Fig. 5A). In addition, X-ray and CT examination revealed stable internal fixation of the spine, and there was no clinical or radiological evidence of local recurrence or metastasis (Fig. 5B-F). The patient achieved good spine stabilization and was able to walk and perform daily activities without assistance. The postoperative Nurick score decreased from grade 3 to grade 2, and the postoperative McCormick grade was I. On the last follow-up (June 2020) the patient was in good overall condition with good mobility, and the lung lesions were stable. Computed tomography reconstruction of the thoracic vertebra and pelvis revealed no loosening or fracture in the internal fixation, and no local tumor recurrence.
Discussion
Chordomas are slow-growing, low-to-intermediate-grade tumors that are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with significant bony destruction and soft tissue invasion (1,5). Chordomas may be falsely diagnosed as relatively benign tumors, and their resection may be challenging due to their high invasiveness. Therefore, chordoma resection is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. In addition, the epidemiology of chordoma is unclear (9), particularly as regards its incidence rates and the most frequently affected parts of the axial skeleton (10,11). This is clinically significant, since the symptoms and treatment strategies of chordoma largely depend on its anatomical location (12,13).
Pain is the most common symptom of chordoma. Furthermore, spinal cord or nerve root compression may result in neurological symptoms, whereas nerve root involvement in the sacrum leads to bowel and bladder dysfunction, including incontinence (14). Although CT and MRI may be used to determine the extent of chordoma lesions and facilitate surgical planning, pathological examination following puncture biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing chordoma. Complete surgical resection with negative margins may effectively reduce the risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis (15,16). Our patient had been experiencing intermittent lumbosacral pain and root pain of the lower limbs over the previous 2 years, and eventually developed incontinence. CT and MRI examination revealed bone destruction of the right medial wall of the spinal canal and right pedicle of the T11 vertebra, and a soft tissue mass with well-defined boundaries protruding into the spinal canal, resulting in dural sac compression. Therefore, posterior decompression of the thoracic tumor was performed to reduce compression symptoms, and the spine was stabilized by intravertebral fixation, followed by extensive sacral tumor resection.
The 2020 NCCN guidelines (17) for the diagnosis and treatment of sacrococcygeal or spinal chordomas recommend extensive resection of operable lesions. Postoperative radiotherapy may be considered if the resection margin is positive or if the soft tissue mass is large (>7 cm in largest diameter). Surgical resection, whether curative or subtotal, remains the gold standard for the treatment of chordoma. It has been reported that the recurrence rate of chordomas located in the sacrum and spine was 33% following extensive resection and 67% after intracapsular or marginal resection (18). Sacral chordomas may be classified into proximal and distal types, depending on the affected segments; the former involves the first and second segments of the sacrum, and the latter originates from other segments. A combined anteroposterior approach is considered as appropriate for proximal sacrum chordoma and the posterior approach for distal sacrum chordoma (19). For S1 or S2 level tumors, resection via the posterior approach is considered as adequate and is associated with an acceptable risk of surgical complications. However, curative or complete resection is difficult to achieve due to invasion of the tumor mass into the vertebral body, spinal cord, nerve roots, peripheral nerves, or other tissues. Therefore, only 10-20% of chordomas are curable by surgery, and the postoperative recurrence rate is high (20).
Radiotherapy is often combined with surgery to improve local control. A recent retrospective study reported that the 5-year local control and survival rates were 85.4 and 81.9%, respectively, in patients without surgical resection of chordoma who were treated by photon or proton radiotherapy (21). A chordoma recurrence rate of >90% has been reported following subtotal intratumoral resection and radiotherapy, which may be attributed to incomplete tumor removal (22). By contrast, Park et al demonstrated that local radiotherapy after complete resection improved the 5- and 10-year survival rates to 93 and 91%, respectively (23). For patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention due to underlying conditions (e.g., compromised renal/cardiac function), radiation therapy alone may be warranted. Chen et al (24) reported a 5-year survival rate of 78% with high-dose radiation in a study on patients with chordoma who were not deemed fit for surgery. Therefore, an initial tumor debulking surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, may be a viable strategy. In addition, radiotherapy may also be used for inoperable patients.
There is currently no clearly effective drug recommended for the systemic treatment of chordoma. Imatinib and sorafenib may delay disease progression or partially alleviate symptoms in some cases (25-29). Erlotinib and apatinib may also be administered (30,31). However, conventional chemotherapy is not considered as a suitable option for advanced chordomas, apart from cases with well-differentiated tumors (32-34).
Despite the low risk (5%) of metastasis, the prognosis of chordoma remains poor, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 50-68 and 28-40%, respectively (5). A retrospective analysis of 115 patients with sacral chordoma who underwent surgery revealed a 5-year overall survival rate of 81% over a mean follow-up duration of 4.9 years (range, 1.3-10.8 years). The survival rates declined in the initial 3 years and improved in the 4th year. The effect of surgical margin and prior surgery were not correlated linearly with conditional survival (35). Another retrospective study on 171 patients with sacral chordoma recurrence indicated metastasis in 17 cases (10.8%), including 5 with primary pulmonary metastasis, 3 with bone metastasis (ribs and sternum) and 9 with postoperative pulmonary metastasis. Of the 14 patients with pulmonary metastases, 9 succumbed to the disease, whereas 2 patients with rib metastases underwent rib resection and did not develop any new lesions. A patient with spinal metastasis underwent tumor removal and decompression, followed by a second surgery upon recurred in the spine. Furthermore, local recurrence was identified as the only significant risk factor for metastasis (36).
Based on the findings of the present case and those of previous studies, it may be inferred that local progression and recurrence are the most crucial prognostic factors of chordoma. In addition, the extent of the initial surgical resection is also prognostically significant. It was previously reported that age, sex, treatment history, tumor location, pathological grade, surgical margin, radiotherapy and chemotherapy affect the long-term prognosis of chordoma patients (37). In the same cohort, younger age (pediatric group), sacral location, dedifferentiated tumors and chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors of shorter progression-free survival, whereas larger tumor size and tumor necrosis have also been implicated as negative prognostic factors (7).
Lumbosacral chordoma with pulmonary metastasis is difficult to treat due to its anatomical location and high risk of local recurrence. The case presented herein demonstrated that radical surgery may effectively control the local recurrence or distant metastasis of chordoma, whereas the combination of surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy may further improve patient outcomes.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed in the present study are included in this published article.
Authors' contributions
SBG and RB conceived and designed the study. SBG, RB, ZQZ, YXW, WZ and CLL participated in the design of the study and drafting of the manuscript. LSW and SXC performed anesthesia and monitoring for surgery. SBG, RB, ZQZ, CLL, YXW and WZ reviewed and edited the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Patient consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the case details and associated images. A copy of the consent form is available for review.
Competing interests
All the authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Walcott BP, Nahed BV, Mohyeldin A, Coumans JV, Kahle KT and Ferreira MJ: Chordoma: Current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol. 13:e69–e76. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ropper AE, Cahill KS, Hanna JW, McCarthy EF, Gokaslan ZL and Chi JH: Primary vertebral tumors: A review of epidemiologic, histological and imaging findings, part II: Locally aggressive and malignant tumors. Neurosurgery. 70:211–219. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chambers KJ, Lin DT, Meier J, Remenschneider A, Herr M and Gray ST: Incidence and survival patterns of cranial chordoma in the United States. Laryngoscope. 124:1097–1102. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
McMaster ML, Goldstein AM, Bromley CM, Ishibe N and Parry DM: Chordoma: Incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995. Cancer Causes Control. 12:1–11. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sciubba DM, Chi JH, Rhines LD and Gokaslan ZL: Chordoma of the spinal column. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 19:5–15. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jahangiri A, Jian B, Miller L, El-Sayed IH and Aghi MK: Skull base chordomas: Clinical features, prognostic factors, and therapeutics. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 24:79–88. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chugh R, Tawbi H, Lucas DR, Biermann JS, Schuetze SM and Baker LH: Chordoma: The non sarcoma primary bone tumor. Oncologist. 12:1344–1350. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fuchs B, Dickey ID, Yaszemski MJ, Inwards CY and Sim FH: Operative management of sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 87:2211–2216. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bongers MER, Dea N, Ames CP and Schwab JH: Surgical strategies for chordoma. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 31:251–261. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
D'Amore T, Boyce B and Mesfin A: Chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum: Clinical management and prognosis. J Spine Surg. 4:546–552. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Alan O, Akin Telli T, Ercelep O, Tanrikulu Simsek E, Basoglu Tuylu T, Mutis A, Hasanov R, Kaya S, Akgül Babacan N, Dane F and Yumuk PF: Chordoma: A case series and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 12(239)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Vellutini EAS, Brock RS, Martins HO, Taricco MA and de Oliveira MF: Diffuse spinal spreading following previous intracranial intradural chordoma resection: A rare case report. J Clin Neurosci. 64:44–46. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Akmansu M, Kurt G, Demircan V and Senturk E: Results of chordoma patients treated by different approaches in a single institution. Turk Neurosurg. 30:366–370. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ahmed R, Sheybani A, Menezes AH, Buatti JM and Hitchon PW: Disease outcomes for skull base and spinal chordomas: A single center experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 130:67–73. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pu F, Wang B, Liu J, Chen F and Shao Z: Giant chordoma in the thoracolumbar spine: A case report and literature review. Eur Spine J. 26 (Suppl 1):S95–S99. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Colangeli S, Muratori F, Bettini L, Frenos F, Totti F, D'Arienzo A, Campo FR, Scoccianti G, Beltrami G, Campanacci DA and Capanna R: Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: En bloc resection with negative margins is a determinant of the long-term outcome. Surg Technol Int. 33:343–348. 2018.PubMed/NCBI | |
Niu XH: Interpretation of 2020 NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology-bone cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 58:430–434. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In Chinese). | |
Ruggieri P, Angelini A, Ussia G, Montalti M and Mercuri M: Surgical margins and local control in resection of sacral chordomas. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 468:2939–2947. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mohanty S, Pai Kanhangad M and Kundangar R: The extended posterior approach for resection of sacral tumours. Eur Spine J. 28:1461–1467. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yang Y, Li Y, Liu W, Xu H and Niu X: The clinical outcome of recurrent sacral chordoma with further surgical treatment. Medicine (Baltimore). 97(e13730)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kabolizadeh P, Chen YL, Liebsch N, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH, Choy E, Rosenthal DI, Niemierko A and DeLaney TF: Updated outcome and analysis of tumor response in mobile spine and sacral chordoma treated with definitive high-dose photon/proton radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 97:254–262. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Imai R, Kamada T, Tsuji H, Sugawara S, Serizawa I, Tsujii H and Tatezaki S: Working Group for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Effect of carbon ion radiotherapy for sacral chordoma: Results of Phase I-II and Phase II clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 77:1470–1476. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Park L, Delaney TF, Liebsch NJ, Hornicek FJ, Goldberg S, Mankin H, Rosenberg AE, Rosenthal DI and Suit HD: Sacral chordomas: Impact of high-dose proton/photon-beam radiation therapy combined with or without surgery for primary versus recurrent tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 65:1514–1521. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen YL, Liebsch N, Kobayashi W, Goldberg S, Kirsch D, Calkins G, Childs S, Schwab J, Hornicek F and DeLaney T: Definitive high-dose photon/proton radiotherapy for unresected mobile spine and sacral chordomas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38:E930–E936. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bompas E, Le Cesne A, Tresch-Bruneel E, Lebellec L, Laurence V, Collard O, Saada-Bouzid E, Isambert N, Blay JY, Amela EY, et al: Sorafenib in patients with locally advanced and metastatic chordomas: a phase II trial of the French Sarcoma Group (GSF/GETO). Ann Oncol. 26:2168–2173. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lebellec L, Bertucci F, Tresch-Bruneel E, Bompas E, Toiron Y, Camoin L, Mir O, Laurence V, Clisant S, Decoupigny E, et al: Circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as predictive factor of progression-free survival in patients with advanced chordoma receiving sorafenib: An analysis from a phase II trial of the French sarcoma group (GSF/GETO). Oncotarget. 7:73984–73994. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stacchiotti S, Longhi A, Ferraresi V, Grignani G, Comandone A, Stupp R, Bertuzzi A, Tamborini E, Pilotti S, Messina A, et al: Phase II study of imatinib in advanced chordoma. J Clin Oncol. 30:914–920. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
George S, Merriam P, Maki RG, Van den Abbeele AD, Yap JT, Akhurst T, Harmon DC, Bhuchar G, O'Mara MM, D'Adamo DR, et al: Multicenter phase II trial of sunitinib in the treatment of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 27:3154–3160. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stacchiotti S, Marrari A, Tamborini E, Palassini E, Virdis E, Messina A, Crippa F, Morosi C, Gronchi A, Pilotti S and Casali PG: Response to imatinib plus sirolimus in advanced chordoma. Ann Oncol. 20:1886–1894. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Meng T, Jin J, Jiang C, Huang R, Yin H, Song D and Cheng L: Molecular targeted therapy in the treatment of chordoma: A systematic review. Front Oncol. 9(30)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu C, Jia Q, Wei H, Yang X, Liu T, Zhao J, Ling Y, Wang C, Yu H, Li Z, et al: Apatinib in patients with advanced chordoma: A single-arm, single-centre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 21:1244–1252. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stacchiotti S and Sommer J: Chordoma Global Consensus Group. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: A position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol. 16:e71–e83. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stacchiotti S, Gronchi A, Fossati P, Akiyama T, Alapetite C, Baumann M, Blay JY, Bolle S, Boriani S, Bruzzi P, et al: Best practices for the management of local-regional recurrent chordoma: A position paper by the chordoma global consensus group. Ann Oncol. 28:1230–1242. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Colia V and Stacchiotti S: Medical treatment of advanced chordomas. Eur J Cancer. 83:220–228. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ji T, Guo W, Yang R, Tang X, Wang Y and Huang L: What are the conditional survival and functional outcomes after surgical treatment of 115 patients with sacral chordoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 475:620–630. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yang Y, Niu X, Li Y, Liu W and Xu H: Recurrence and survival factors analysis of 171 cases of sacral chordoma in a single institute. Eur Spine J. 26:1910–1916. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhou J, Sun J, Bai HX, Huang X, Zou Y, Tan X, Zhang Z, Tang X, Tao Y, Xiao B, et al: Prognostic factors in patients with spinal chordoma: An integrative analysis of 682 patients. Neurosurgery. 81:812–823. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |