Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations involving the anterior cerebral artery
- Authors:
- Kun Hou
- Yiheng Wang
- Wei Li
- Jinlu Yu
View Affiliations
Affiliations: Department of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, P.R. China, Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, Hebei 054000, P.R. China
- Published online on: November 8, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2021.22
-
Article Number:
22
-
Copyright: © Hou
et al. This is an open access article distributed under the
terms of Creative
Commons Attribution License.
Metrics: Total
Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
This article is mentioned in:
Abstract
To date, at least to the best of our knowledge, there are only limited studies available on the endovascular treatment (EVT) of brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) involving the anterior cerebral artery (ACA), thus termed ACA‑BAVMs. The present study retrospectively examined 60 patients with ACA‑BAVMs treated with EVT. The patients were aged between 10 and 72 years (mean age, 35.4±7.0 years) and included 28 females (46.7%, 28/60). The ACA‑BAVMs were divided into three types: Type I BAVMs were those located below and in front of the corpus callosum genu, type II BAVMs were those located at the upper area of the corpus callosum from the genu to the anterior portion of corpus callosum body, and type III BAVMs were those located from the anterior portion of corpus callosum body to the splenium of the corpus callosum. There were 9 (15%, 9/60), 15 (25%, 15/60) and 36 (60%, 36/60) patients with type I, II and III ACA‑BAVMs, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed that the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) tended to be involved in type II and III BAVMs. All patients were treated using EVT. During EVT, there were 3 cases of intraoperative bleeding (5%, 3/60), which tended to occur in type I and II ACA‑BAVMs. The other 57 cases (95%, 57/60) had no complications and new neurological deficits. At the time of discharge, 48 (80%, 48/60) patients had a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5. During the clinical follow‑up period, 47 patients were classified according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score; 39 (83%, 39/47) patients presented with an mRS score of 0. On the whole, the present study demonstrated that EVT may be a safe treatment for ACA‑BAVMs.
View Figures |
Figure 1
|
|
Figure 2
|
|
Figure 3
|
|
Figure 4
|
|
Figure 5
|
|
Figure 6
|
|
Figure 7
|
|
Figure 8
|
View References
1
|
Lawton MT, Rutledge WC, Kim H, Stapf C,
Whitehead KJ, Li DY, Krings T, terBrugge K, Kondziolka D, Morgan
MK, et al: Brain arteriovenous malformations. Nat Rev Dis Primers.
1(15008)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
2
|
Solomon RA and Connolly ES Jr:
Arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med.
376:1859–1866. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
3
|
Ecker RD: Epistemology of brain
arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg. 89:697–698.
2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
4
|
Batista LL and Azevedo HC: Anterior
cerebral artery. J Neurosurg. 101(717): author reply 717.
2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
5
|
Picard L, Miyachi S, Braun M, Bracard S,
Per A and Marchal JC: Arteriovenous malformations of the corpus
callosum-radioanatomic study and effectiveness of intranidus
embolization. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 36:851–859. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
6
|
Hou K, Xu K, Chen X, Ji T, Guo Y and Yu J:
Targeted endovascular treatment for ruptured brain arteriovenous
malformations. Neurosurg Rev. 43:1509–1518. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
7
|
Jennett B and Bond M: Assessment of
outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1:480–484.
1975.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
8
|
Rankin J: Cerebral vascular accidents in
patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 2:200–215.
1957.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
9
|
Hunt WE and Hess RM: Surgical risk as
related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial
aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 28:14–20. 1968.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
10
|
Spetzler RF and Martin NA: A proposed
grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg.
65:476–483. 1986.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
11
|
Li K, Guo Y, Qu L, Xu B, Xu K and Yu J:
Hybrid surgery for an arteriovenous malformation fed by an
accessory middle cerebral artery and drained by a developmental
venous anomaly: A case report and literature review. Exp Ther Med.
16:1994–2000. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
12
|
Rhoton AL Jr: The supratentorial arteries.
Neurosurgery. 51 (Suppl 4):S53–S120. 2002.PubMed/NCBI
|
13
|
Hou K, Li G, Luan T, Xu K and Yu J: The
prospects and pitfalls in the endovascular treatment of moyamoya
disease-associated intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev.
44:261–271. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
14
|
Pabaney AH, Ali R, Kole M and Malik GM:
Arteriovenous malformations of the corpus callosum: Pooled analysis
and systematic review of literature. Surg Neurol Int. 7 (Suppl
9):S228–S236. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
15
|
da Costa MDS, Santos BFO, de Almeida
Guardini FB and Chaddad-Neto F: Microsurgical treatment for
arteriovenous malformation of the corpus callosum and choroidal
fissure. Neurosurg Focus. 43(V12)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|
16
|
Cagnazzo F, Brinjikji W and Lanzino G:
Arterial aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations of
the brain: Classification, incidence, risk of hemorrhage, and
treatment-a systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien).
158:2095–2104. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
|