Efficacy of increasing levels of exposure therapy in the treatment of maladaptive behaviors and anxiety

Bal,Fatih

doi:10.3892/mi.2023.115

Efficacy of increasing levels of exposure therapy in the treatment of maladaptive behaviors and anxiety

Authors:
- Fatih Bal
View Affiliations

Affiliations: Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Sakarya University, Serdivan, Sakarya 54187, Turkey
Published online on: October 3, 2023 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2023.115
Article Number: 55
Copyright : © Bal . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Metrics: Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )

Cited By (CrossRef): 0 citations Loading Articles...

Abstract

The present study examined the effectiveness of increasing levels of exposure therapy, which is applied for the treatment of maladaptive behaviors and anxiety. A total of 16 sessions were applied to the study group in the experimental group three times a week for 10 weeks. Patients aged ≥18 years whom the referring clinician evaluated as meeting the criteria for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM‑V‑TR) Generalized Anxiety Disorder were included in the study. For the control group, demographic characteristics and Spielberger's State‑Trait Anxiety Inventory were applied in the first session, followed by Spielberger's State‑Trait Anxiety Inventory as a post‑test and follow‑up. Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings of the study group were obtained at the cortical level. Electrodes for EEG measurements were recorded using the International 10/20 Electrode Placement System. EEG data were obtained using the EEG Analysis Program software. Following the data collection phase, all data were entered into cells based on items using SPSS 25 software. When the findings obtained in the study were examined, it was determined that the increasing levels of exposure and behavioral therapy applied for maladaptive anxiety decreased the anxiety levels compared to those before therapy. This finding can be interpreted as that the cortical function‑oriented application method for anxiety effectively reduced the anxiety levels of the study group. However, EEG asymmetry revealed a change in the data before and after the application. These findings demonstrate that the application affects the EEG asymmetry changes at the cortical level.

View Figures

View References

1	Armstrong E, Zilles K, Curtis M and Schleicher A: Cortical folding, the lunate sulcus and the evolution of the human brain. J Hum Evolution. 20:341–348. 1991.
2	Coan JA and Allen JJB: Frontal EEG asymmetry and the behavioral activation and inhibition systems. Psychophysiology. 40:106–114. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
3	Kenwood MM, Kalin NH and Barbas H: The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 47:260–275. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
4	Miller EK and Cohen JD: An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Ann Rev Neurosci. 24:167–202. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
5	Badre D and D'Esposito M: Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a hierarchical organization of the prefrontal cortex. J Cogn Neurosci. 19:2082–2099. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
6	Tanji J and Hoshi E: Behavioral planning in the prefrontal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 11:164–170. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
7	Thompson RF and Kim JJ: Memory systems in the brain and localization of a memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:13438–13444. 1996.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
8	Fell J, Klaver P, Elfadil H, Schaller C, Elger CE and Fernández G: Rhinal-hippocampal theta coherence during declarative memory formation: Interaction with gamma synchronization? Eur J Neurosci. 17:1082–1088. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
9	Maren S, Phan KL and Liberzon I: The contextual brain: Implications for fear conditioning, extinction, and psychopathology. Nat Rev Neurosci. 14:417–428. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
10	Curzon P, Rustay NR and Browman KE: Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning for Rodents. In: Methods of Behavior Analysis in Neuroscience. 2nd edition. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (FL), 2009.
11	Britton JC, Lissek S, Grillon C, Norcross MA and Pine DS: Development of anxiety: The role of threat appraisal and fear learning. Depress Anxiety. 28:5–17. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
12	American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth edition. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2013. See more at: http://www.adhdinstitute.com/assessment diagnosis/diagnosis/dsm-5tm/#sthash.8YJw9SHo.dpuf.
13	Moscovitch DA, Santesso DL, Miskovic V, McCabe RE, Antony MM and Schmidt LA: Frontal EEG asymmetry and symptom response to cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with social anxiety disorder. Biol Psychol. 87:379–385. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
14	Herry C, Ferraguti F, Singewald N, Letzkus JJ, Ehrlich I and Lüthi A: Neuronal circuits of fear extinction. Eur J Neurosci. 31:599–612. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
15	Kim MJ, Loucks RA, Palmer AL, Brown AC, Solomon KM, Marchante AN and Whalen PJ: The structural and functional connectivity of the amygdala: From normal emotion to pathological anxiety. Behav Brain Res. 223:403–410. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
16	Jaggar M, Fanibunda SE, Ghosh S, Duman RS and Vaidya VA: The neurotrophic hypothesis of depression revisited: New insights and therapeutic implications in Neurobiology of depression. Academic Press, 2019.
17	Mah L, Szabuniewicz C and Fiocco AJ: Can anxiety damage the brain? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 29:56–63. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
18	Thayer JF, Friedman BH, Borkovec TD, Johnsen BH and Molina S: Phasic heart period reactions to cued threat and nonthreat stimuli in generalized anxiety disorder. Psychophysiology. 37:361–368. 2000.PubMed/NCBI
19	Siever LJ: Neurobiology of aggression and violence. Am J Psychiatry. 165:429–442. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
20	Streeter CC, Gerbarg PL, Saper RB, Ciraulo DA and Brown RP: Effects of yoga on the autonomic nervous system, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and allostasis in epilepsy, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Med Hypotheses. 78:571–579. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
21	McEwen BS, Nasca C and Gray JD: Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 41:3–23. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
22	Hains AB, Vu MAT, Maciejewski PK, van Dyck CH, Gottron M and Arnsten AF: Inhibition of protein kinase C signaling protects prefrontal cortex dendritic spines and cognition from the effects of chronic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 106:17957–17962. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
23	Arnsten AF: Stress signaling pathways impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 10:410–422. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
24	Sarter M, Givens B and Bruno JP: The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: Where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev. 35:146–160. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar
25	Frodl TS, Koutsouleris N, Bottlender R, Born C, Jäger M, Scupin I, Reiser M, Möller HJ and Meisenzahl EM: Depression-related variation in brain morphology over 3 years: Effects of stress? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 65:1156–1165. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar