Open Access

Predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19: A retrospective cohort study

  • Authors:
    • Anita Katić
    • Nermina Rizvanović
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 9, 2024     https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.198
  • Article Number: 74
  • Copyright : © Katić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The association between hypertension as a pre‑existing comorbidity and the severe form of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) remains unclear due to the contradictory results of previously published studies. The present study evaluated the predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications among critically ill patients with COVID‑19. The present study included 372 critically ill adults with COVID‑19 pneumonia, hospitalized between January 1 and December 31, 2021. The study cohort was divided into the hypertension group (HTA group), which included 245 patients with a history of hypertension, or a non‑HTA group (control group), which included 127 patients without hypertension. The incidence of complications was retrospectively extracted from medical records and compared between groups. Multivariate regression analysis (adjusted for potential confounders) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined the predictive significance of hypertension on the incidence of complications. The patients in the HTA group were more likely to receive invasive mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR), 1.696; P<0.02], develop sepsis (OR, 1.807; P<0.01) and develop complications (OR, 3.101; P<0.001). Hypertension was an independent positive predictor for invasive mechanical ventilation [area under the curve (AUC), 0.67; positive predictive value (PPV), 71.7%; P<0.05], sepsis (AUC, 0.69; PPV, 77.5%; P<0.026) and total complications per patient (AUC, 0.71; PPV, 81.4%; P<0.001). On the whole, the data of the present study indicate that a history of hypertension should be considered as an independent clinical predictor of a higher incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19. Patients with pre‑existing hypertension and a diagnosis of COVID‑19 require timely identification, additional attention and treatment to avoid a critical course and help improve outcomes.

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is considered one of the greatest global public health crises. Initial respiratory infections can rapidly progress to severe pneumonia in predisposed individuals. Of note, ~33% of patients hospitalized due to COVID-19-associated pneumonia develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and 16-26% of patients require intensive care unit (ICU) admission and treatment with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (1). Other complications, such as sepsis, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute renal failure (ARF) and thromboembolic events, occur in patients undergoing treatment in the ICU. The mortality rate among critically ill patients with COVID-19 is as high as 78% (2), depending on the geographic and social characteristics of the population.

SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) receptors on the surface of type II pneumocytes, and cardiac, renal, brain, intestinal and endothelial cells, leading to an imbalance in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) (3). An overactivated angiotensin II (Ang II)-Ang II type I receptor (AT1R) axis promotes inflammatory signaling, cytokine storms, massive endothelial cell injury and coagulation disorders (4).

Previous studies have found that hypertension is one of the most common comorbidities among patients with COVID-19 (5,6). The proposed link between hypertension and COVID-19 is the interruption of the classical RAS pathway due to the downregulation of the ACE2 receptors, and hyperactivation of the Ang II-AT1R axis. Hypertension itself induces endothelial inflammation, and weakens the immune response, causing target organ damage that may increase susceptibility to serious complications of COVID-19(3). The association between hypertension and the severe form of COVID-19 remains unclear, as certain studies have reported that hypertension increases the severity or mortality from COVID-19 (2,5,7), while others have not found such evidence (8,9).

In May 2023, the World Health Organization declared the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Epidemiologists have predicted that COVID-19 will continue with annual fluctuations in infection and may persist beyond 2025(10). Considering that an estimated 1.28 billion adults worldwide have hypertension (11), and no specific drug has yet been approved for the treatment of COVID-19, the aim of the present study was to investigate whether hypertension contributes to the development of complications in patients undergoing treatment in the ICU for COVID-19.

The present study aimed to assess the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia and a history of hypertension, as compared with patients without hypertension. The predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was determined.

Patients and methods

Study design

The present retrospective single-center study was conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2021, at the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care of the Cantonal Hospital in Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The study report followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines (12).

Ethics approval

The Research Hospital Ethics Committee of the Zenica Cantonal Hospital approved the study protocol (approval no. 00-03-35-337-23/23). The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki (13), and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or their next-of-kin.

Patient selection

The present study included data from 372 critically ill adults diagnosed with COVID-19. COVID-19 infection was confirmed by the reverse transcription PCR of nasopharyngeal swab samples. The criteria for admission to the ICU were as follows: Respiratory distress with dyspnea and tachypnea (>30/min), oxygen saturation in room air <90%, a ratio of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) <300 mmHg, and the progression of pulmonary infiltrates by >50% within 48 h on a chest radiography (14). Patients with incomplete medical records, those aged <18 years, those resuscitated immediately upon admission to the ICU, those hospitalized <24 h in the ICU, or those with COVID-19 infection, but admitted to the ICU for reasons other than pneumonia (e.g., pregnancy, trauma, tumor surgery or chronic organ dysfunction) were excluded from the study. Patients who met the study criteria were divided into the hypertension group (HTA group; study group), which included 245 patients with a history of hypertension, and a non-HTA group (control group), which included 127 patients without hypertension. Hypertension was defined as an office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) (15). All patients received the same therapeutic protocol, including respiratory support, ventilation strategy, corticosteroids (methylprednisolone), anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin), antibiotics (second generation cephalosporins), antivirals (remdesivir) and immunomodulatory therapy (tocilizumab). Patients in the HTA group continued with previously prescribed antihypertensive medications.

Data collection

Data were retrieved from the electronic medical records by two researchers. Demographic and clinical data included age, sex, comorbidities, time from onset of symptoms to hospitalization (T1), time from hospitalization to ICU admission (T2) and the length of stay in the ICU (T3). Hemodynamic parameters recorded at ICU admission, such as SBP, DBP, mean BP (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were also collected. Initial BP was classified into grades according to the ESC and ESH in both groups. The type and number of anti-hypertensive drugs were documented in the HTA group.

Study outcomes

The primary outcomes were intra-group differences in the incidence of the following complications: IMV, sepsis, ACS, ARF, hemodialysis, cerebrovascular insults (CVIs), thromboembolic complications, pleural abnormalities, surgical procedures and total complications per patient. The secondary aim was to determine the predictive value of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19.

Definitions of complications

IMV was defined as a therapeutic option for ARDS refractory to non-invasive respiratory support, altered consciousness and the progression of gas analysis abnormalities (pH ≤7.25, PaO2 ≤45 mmHg, SpO2 <85% with FiO2 0.5). Sepsis was defined according to The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock. ACS was defined according to The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. ARF and hemodialysis were defined according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury. CVI was defined as an acute, focal or global neurological disorder caused by a cerebral infarction or hemorrhage. Thromboembolic complications (acute limb ischemia, pulmonary embolism and intestinal infarction) were defined as thrombotic occlusions of circulation in the extremities, lungs and mesenteric/bowel blood vessels. Pleural abnormalities (pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum) were defined as the presence of air in the pleural space or mediastinum. Surgical procedures (arterial thrombectomy, amputation of ischemic limbs and laparotomy) were defined as therapeutic treatments for thromboembolic and ischemic events or gastrointestinal bleeding, and were performed under general, spinal or regional anesthesia.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v. 25.0 (IBM Corp.). The normality of the data distribution was confirmed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (percentages) and compared using the Pearson's χ2 test and Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or as a median (interquartile range) and tested using an unpaired Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. A multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted for potential confounders) was used to determine the predictive accuracy of hypertension for the incidence of complications. The predictive discriminative power of hypertension was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value were calculated. A two-sided P<0.05, 95% confidence interval and an expected study power of 80% were considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients in the two groups

In 2021, 456 adult patients with COVID-19 were admitted to the ICU. A total of 372 patients met the eligibility criteria, and were included in the present study and analyzed. There were 245 (65.8%) patients with hypertension and 127 (34.2%) without a history of hypertension (Fig. 1).

The median age was higher in the HTA group [67 (61.5-72.3) years] than in the control group [62 (53.1-68.5) years; P<0.001]. There were more male than female patients in both groups, although no significant difference was found. Coronary heart disease (36.3%) was the most common comorbidity in the HTA group, whereas chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.2%) was the most common comorbidity in the control group. The average number of comorbidities per patient was higher in the HTA group (2.14±0.97 vs. 0.94±0.34; P<0.001). Significantly higher SBP, DBP, MBP and HR values at ICU admission were observed in the HTA group (P<0.001). In the HTA group, initial BP was most frequently classified as grade 1 hypertension [80 patients (32.7%)]. In the control group, initial BP was most often classified as high-normal [42 patients (33.2%)]. ACE inhibitors were the most common anti-hypertensive therapy administered to 183 patients (74.6%) in the HTA group (Table I).

Table I

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.

Table I

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.

ParametersHTA group, n=245 (65.8%)non-HTA group, n=127 (34.2%)P-value
Age, years (median, IQR)67 (61.5-72.3)62 (53.1-68.5) 0.001a
Sex, n (%)  0.067b
     Male141 (57.6)86 (67.7) 
     Female104 (42.4)41 (32.3) 
Comorbidities, n (%)   
     Coronary heart disease   0.001b
          Yes89 (36.3)12 (9.4) 
          No156 (63.7)115 (90.6) 
     Diabetes mellitus   0.001b
          Yes81 (33.1)17 (13.4) 
          No164 (66.9)110 (86.6) 
     COPD  0.162b
          Yes23 (9.4)18 (14.2) 
          No222 (90.6)109 (85.8) 
     Hypothyroidism  0.096b
          Yes21 (8.6)5 (3.9) 
          No224 (91.4)122 (96.1) 
     Chronic kidney disease  0.174c
          Yes9 (3.7)1 (0.8) 
          No236 (96.3)126 (99.2) 
     Cerebrovascular disease  0.171b
          Yes8 (3.6)8 (6.3) 
          No237 (96.4)199 (93.6) 
Average of comorbidities   
     per patient (mean ± SD)2.14±0.970.94±0.34 0.001d
T1, days (median, IQR)7.0 (5.0-10.0)7.0 (5.0-9.0)0.121a
T2, days (median, IQR)3.0 (1.0-5.0)3.0 (2.0-5.0)0.070a
T3, days (median, IQR)6.0 (4.0-8.5)7.0 (4.0-9.0)0.346a
SBP, mmHg (mean ± SD)145.04±17.15132.28±7.86 0.001d
DBP, mmHg (mean ± SD)106.97±15.4896.19±10.46 0.001d
MBP, mmHg (mean ± SD)88.04±12.8579.48±9.81 0.001d
Heart rate, beat/min (mean ± SD)101.88±21.1991.96±15.88 0.001d
Hypertension grade, n (%)   0.001b
     Optimal BP, <120 mmHg26 (10.6)25 (19.6) 
     Normal BP, 120-130/80-84 mmHg29 (11.8)36 (28.3) 
     High-normal BP, 130-139/85-89 mmHg43 (17.6)42 (33.2) 
     Grade 1 HTA, 140-159/90-99 mmHg80 (32.7)24 (18.9) 
     Grade 2 HTA, 160-179/100-109 mmHg43 (17.6)//
     Grade 3 HTA, >180/110 mmHg24 (9.8)//
Type of anti-hypertensive drugs, n (%)   
     ACE inhibitors183 (74.6)//
     Angiotensin receptor blockers31 (12.7)//
     Calcium channel blockers67 (27.3)//
     β-blockers112 (45.7)//
     Diuretics100 (40.8)//
Average of antihypertensive drugs   
     per patient (mean ± SD)2.70±1.34//

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). P-values were obtained using: the

[ii] aMann-Whitney U test,

[iii] bPearson's χ2 test,

[iv] cFisher's exact test,

[v] dStudent's t-test. HTA group, patients with hypertension; non-HTA group, patients without hypertension; IQR, interquartile range; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; SD, standard deviation; T1, time from onset of symptoms to hospitalization; T2, time from hospitalization to intensive care unit admission; T3, length of stay in the intensive care unit; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MBP, mean blood pressure; ACE, angiotensin convertase enzyme.

Comparison of the incidence of complications between groups

A significantly higher incidence of IMV (P<0.001), sepsis (P<0.001), ACS (P<0.043), ARF (P<0.007), hemodialysis (P<0.018), CVIs (P<0.037), surgical procedures (P<0.09) and total complications per patient (P<0.001) was noted in the HTA group. There were 27 (11%) patients without complications in the HTA group compared with 43 (33.9%) in the control group (P<0.001; Table II).

Table II

Incidence and distribution of complications according to the groups.

Table II

Incidence and distribution of complications according to the groups.

ComplicationsHTA group, n=245 (65.8%)non-HTA group, n=127 (34.2%)95 % CIP-value
IMV, n (%)  0.00-0.00 0.001a
     Yes215 (87.8)85 (66.9)  
     No30 (12.2)42 (33.1)  
Sepsis, n (%)  0.00-0.00 0.001a
     Yes141 (57.6)35 (27.6)  
     No34 (27.6)92 (72.4)  
Acute coronary syndrome, n (%)  0.05-0.06 0.043a
     Yes42 (17.1)12 (9.4)  
     No203 (82.9)115 (90.6)  
Acute renal failure, n (%)  0.00-0.010.007a
     Yes50 (20.4)12 (9.4)  
     No195 (79.6)115 (90.6)  
Hemodialysis, n (%)  0.02-0.03 0.018b
     Yes10 (4.1)0 (0)  
     No235 (95.9)127(100)  
Cerebrovascular insults, n (%)  0.04-0.05 0.037b
     Yes8 (3.3)0 (0)  
     No237 (96.7)127(100)  
Thromboembolic events, n (%)  0.07-0.080.055a
     Yes26 (10.6)6 (4.7)  
     No219 (89.4)121 (55.3)  
Pleural abnormalities, n (%)  0.12-0.130.131b
     Yes15 (6.1)3 (2.4)  
     No230 (93.9)124 (97.6)  
Surgical procedures, n (%)  0.01-0.01 0.009b
     Yes14 (4.6)1 (0.8)  
     No231 (95.4)126 (99.2)  
Average of complications    
     per patient, (mean ± SD)2.11±1.11.2±0.70.00-0.00 0.001c
Distribution of complications    0.010b
     No complications, n (%)27 (11.0)43 (33.9)0.00-0.00 
     1 complication, n (%)43 (17.6)34 (2.8)0.04-0.04 
     2 complications, n (%)76.(31.1)31 (24.4)0.18-0.19 
     3 complications, n (%)75 (30.6)15 (11.8)0.00-0.00 
     4 complications, n (%)19 (7.8)3 (2.4)0.03-0.04 
     5 complications, n (%)5 (2.0)0 (0.0)0.16-0.17 

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). P-values were obtained using the:

[ii] aPearson's χ2 test,

[iii] bFisher's exact test,

[iv] cStudent's t-test. HTA group, patients with hypertension; non-HTA group, patients without hypertension; CI, confidence interval; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; SD, standard deviation.

Predictive significance of hypertension for the incidence of complications

Univariate regression analysis revealed that hypertension had a potential predictive significance for the incidence of IMV (P<0.001), sepsis (P<0.001), ACS (P<0.040), surgical interventions (P<0.036) and total complications per patient (P<0.001; Table III).

Table III

Univariate regression analysis.

Table III

Univariate regression analysis.

 Univariate regression analysis 
ComplicationsOR95% CIP-value
IMV3.5412.08-6.020.001
Sepsis3.5642.24-5.670.001
Acute coronary syndrome1.9831.00-3.910.040
Acute renal failure2.4571.25-4.800.009
Hemodialysis8.7300.00-0.000.999
Cerebrovascular insults8.6560.00-0.000.999
Thromboembolic events2.3940.95-5.970.061
Pleural abnormalities2.6960.76-9.490.123
Surgical procedures8.8031.15-6.710.036
Total complications per patients1.9871.61-2.440.001

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation.

After adjusting for age, a history of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus, multivariate regression analysis confirmed the independent predictive significance of hypertension on the incidence of IMV (OR=1.696; P<0.02), sepsis (OR=1.807; P<0.01) and total complications per patient (OR=3.101; P<0.001) in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (Table IV).

Table IV

Multivariate regression analysis.

Table IV

Multivariate regression analysis.

 Multivariate analysis
 Unadjusted modelAdjusted modela
ComplicationsOR95% CIP-valueOR95% CIP-value
IMV2.0760.64-4.170.0011.6960.92-2.910.02
Sepsis2.4160.59-4.360.0011.8070.97-3.580.01
Acute coronary syndrome0.5370.20-1.410.208///
Acute renal failure0.4430.16-1.180.104///
Surgical procedures0.5120.19-1.370.193///
Total complications per patients4.0250.91-7.990.0013.1011.57-6.100.001

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

[ii] aAdjusted model, predictive significance of hypertension on the incidence of complications after adjustment for age, history of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus. OR, odds ratio of the predictor variable; CI, confidence interval; IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation

ROC curve analysis demonstrated the predictive discriminative power of hypertension for the incidence of IMV (AUC, 0.67; PPV, 71.7%; P<0.05), sepsis (AUC, 0.69; PPV, 77.5%; P<0.026) and total complications per patient (AUC, 0.71; PPV, 81.4%; P<0.000; Table V).

Table V

Predictive discriminatory power of hypertension on the incidence of complications.

Table V

Predictive discriminatory power of hypertension on the incidence of complications.

 IMVSepsisTotal complications per patient
AUC0.670.690.71
Sensitivity %67.169.673.4
Specificity %60.964.063.2
PPV %71.777.581.4
NPV %34.537.750.1
95% CI0.48-0.700.54-0.790.65-0.81
P-value0.050.0260.001

[i] Values in bold font indicate statistically significant differences (P<0.05). P-values were obtained using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. IMV, invasive mechanical ventilation; AUC, area under curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

The present retrospective study investigated the predictive significance of pre-existing hypertension on the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia. The results revealed that patients with a history of hypertension had a higher incidence of complications during treatment in the ICU. Hypertension was identified as an independent positive predictor of IMV, sepsis and total complications per patient. Hypertension increased the OR for IMV by 1.696-fold, sepsis by 1.807-fold and total complications per patient by 3.101-fold.

The COVID-19 pandemic has officially ended; however, the virus remains widespread worldwide. The emergence of more transmissible and virulent variants of SARS-CoV-2 will continue to pose a threat to global health (16). Patients with chronic diseases, such as hypertension, are still at risk of developing severe forms of COVID-19 and related complications. The prevalence of hypertension in patients with COVID-19 is dependent on the rate of hypertension in the general population and the form of COVID-19. In the present study, hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, present in 65.8% of the critically ill patients. Cummings et al (17) reported a 63% prevalence of hypertension in patients in the ICU.

In the present study, the median age and rates of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus were higher in the HTA group than those in the control group. To avoid confounding factors within baseline characteristics, the multivariate regression analysis was adjusted for age, a history of coronary heart disease and diabetes mellitus. Both groups were predominantly male, which was consistent with previous findings (7,9,18).

In the present study, in 18.9% of the patients in the control group, the mean value of BP at ICU admission was classified as grade 1 hypertension, although they had no history of hypertension. This could have been associated with COVID-19-specific mechanisms, such as cardiovascular consequences of unopposed Ang II-AT1R axis (vasoconstriction, renal salt and water retention, increased sympathetic tone), hypoxia and inflammation (3), but also non-specific mechanisms, such as corticosteroid therapy, fluid and hemodynamic management, sleep deprivation and psychosocial stress.

Despite a large body of research, the difference in complication rates between patients critically ill with COVID-19 with and without hypertension has been limited. The present study found a higher incidence of all the assessed complications in the HTA group. The most common complications were IMV, sepsis, ARF and ACS. Chen et al (18) reported a similar distribution of complications in hypertensive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized inside and outside the ICU, including ARDS, heart failure, sepsis and ARF.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, IMV was the main supportive treatment for hypoxemic ARDS caused by viral alveolar damage and immune-cell infiltration. The IMV rate was 29.1-94%, depending on differences in intubation criteria, ICU resources and target study populations (19,20). In the present study cohort, the incidence of IMV was 80.6%. IMV was required in 215 (87.8%) patients in the HTA group and in 88 (66.9%) patients in the control group.

COVID-19-related sepsis is of viral origin and is based on a hyperinflammatory response to viral infection and consequent immunosuppression, which induces cell apoptosis, hemodynamic instability, metabolic failure and multi-organ damage (21). Herein, sepsis rates of 57.6 and 27.6% were recorded in the HTA and control groups, respectively. Hypertension delays viral clearance, which could contribute to a higher sepsis rate in the HTA group (3).

The mechanisms involved in COVID-19-related ARF include direct viral injury to the kidneys, systemic effects of infection and secondary effects (hemodynamic failure and therapeutic consequences) (22). In the present study, ARF occurred in 50 (20.4%) patients in the HTA group, of whom 10 (20%) required hemodialysis. In the control group, ARF occurred in 12 (9.4%) patients and there was no need for hemodialysis. These findings suggested an adverse effect of pre-existing hypertension on the compensatory capacity of target organs.

The reported rate of COVID-19-related ACS is 16.1-23.8% (23). Cardiotropic viral properties and hyperinflammation cause endotheliitis, a supply/demand imbalance, and a hypercoagulable state, leading to coronary thrombosis. In the present study, the ACS rates were 17.1 and 9.4% in the HTA and control groups, respectively. Hypertension may worsen the rate of ACS with chronically increased sympathetic activity, arterial stiffness and impaired myocardial relaxation (3).

Despite routine thromboprophylaxis, thromboembolic events were recorded in 10.6 and 4.7% of the patients in the HTA and control groups, respectively. Klok et al (24) reported a 31% incidence of thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19in the ICU. The discrepancy in the results between the studies could be explained by the different classifications of complications.

In the literature, the incidence of CVI (ischemic and hemorrhagic) in patients critically ill with COVID-19 was found to be up to 6% (25). In the present study, the rate of CVI in the HTA group was 3.3% and there were no CVIs in the control group. Such a low rate of CVIs was probably underestimated, due to the difficulty of neurological assessment in intubated and sedated patients.

A higher rate of pleural abnormalities was noted in the HTA group due to a greater need for IMV; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.

As was expected, surgical procedures were performed more often in the HTA group due to thromboembolic complications, and acute ischemic and hemorrhagic events were more common in this group.

Previous studies have evaluated the impact of a history of hypertension on the severity of COVID-19, although with very inconsistent results, due to large heterogeneity across the studies, including patient populations (7,9,18), disease course (7,9,18), the definition of hypertension (8,18,26), statistical analysis (2,9,26,27,28) and study outcomes (29,30). In order to minimize bias, the present study focused exclusively on complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing hypertension, and included multivariate regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. These results provided evidence that a history of hypertension increased the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19, and revealed hypertension as a predictor of IMV, sepsis and total complications per patient. There lies the strength of the present study. The study limitations include its retrospective, single-center design and the absence of external validation. The present study also did not evaluate ICU mortality rates or follow-up of patients following ICU and hospital discharge.

In conclusion, pre-existing hypertension predicts a higher incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Early identification and effective treatment of COVID-19 patients with a history of hypertension are paramount to avoid disease progression and complications.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank M.Sc. Senada Čaušević (Cantonal Hospital Zenica, University of Zenica, Faculty of Medicine Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina), for her assistance in proofreading and language editing.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

AK and NR contributed equally to the conception and design of the study, as well as to the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing the first draft of the manuscript; and in revising the manuscript. AK and RN confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. Both authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Research Ethics Committee of the Cantonal Hospital Zenica approved the study protocol (approval no. 00-03-35-337-23/23). The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or their next-of-kin.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Tzotzos SJ, Fischer B, Fischer H and Zeitlinger M: Incidence of ARDS and outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A global literature survey. Crit Care. 24(516)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, Xiang J, Wang Y, Song B, Gu X, et al: Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 395:1054–1062. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Tavares CAM, Bailey MA and Girardi ACC: Biological context linking hypertension and higher risk for COVID-19 severity. Front Physiol. 19(599729)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Peng M, He J, Xue Y, Yang X, Liu S and Gong Z: Role of hypertension on the severity of COVID-19: A review. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 78:648–655. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Fan G, Xu J, Gu X, et al: Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 395:497–506. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Fathi M, Vakili K, Sayehmiri F, Mohamadkhani A, Hajiesmaeili M, Rezaei-Tavirani M and Eilami O: The prognostic value of comorbidity for the severity of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis study. PLoS One. 16(e0246190)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Ayed M, Borahmah AA, Yazdani A, Sultan A, Mossad A and Rawdhan H: Assessment of clinical characteristics and mortality-associated factors in COVID-19 critical cases in Kuwait. Med Princ Pract. 30:185–192. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Shalaeva EV, Shadmanov AК, Azizova FL, Mirakhmedova KT, Messerli FH, Franco OH and Saner H: Is lone hypertension a risk factor for more severe COVID-19 outcomes? Glob Heart. 17(17)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Xavier LG, Neto RS, Morais MHO, Cronemberger PJ, Martins MCC and Rosal M: Clinical aspects of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized in a campaign hospital in Northeast Brazil. Int J Cardiovasc Sci. 36(e2022003)2023.

10 

Scudellari M: How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond. Nature. 584:22–25. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

World Health Organisation. Hypertension. 2023; March 16. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension. Accessed May 15, 2024.

12 

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ and Egger M: STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 18:805–835. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 310:2191–2194. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Chawla R, Dixit SB, Zirpe KG, Chaudhry D, Khilnani GC, Mehta Y, Khatib KI, Jagiasi BG, Chanchalani G, Mishra RC, et al: ISCCM guidelines for the use of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure in adult ICUs. Indian J Crit Care Med. 24:61–81. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Rosei EA, Azizi M, Burnier M, Clement DL, Coca A, de Simone G, Dominiczak A, et al: 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European society of cardiology and the European society of hypertension. J Hypertens. 36:1953–2041. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Sarker R, Roknuzzaman ASM, Hossain MJ, Bhuiyan MA and Islam MR: The WHO declares COVID-19 is no longer a public health emergency of international concern: Benefits, challenges, and necessary precautions to come back to normal life. Int J Surg. 109:2851–2852. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, Aaron JG, Claassen J, Rabbani LE, Hastie J, et al: Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York city: A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 395:1763–1770. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Chen J, Liu Y, Qin J, Ruan C, Zeng X, Xu A, Yang R, Li J, Cai H and Zhang Z: Hypertension as an independent risk factor for severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study. Postgrad Med J. 98:515–522. 2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Wang Y, Lu X, Li Y, Chen H, Chen T, Su N, Huang F, Zhou J, Zhang B, Yan F and Wang J: Clinical course and outcomes of 344 intensive care patients with COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 201:1430–1434. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Aleva FE, van Mourik L, Broeders MEAC, Paling AJ and de Jager CPC: COVID-19 in critically ill patients in North Brabant, the Netherlands: Patient characteristics and outcomes. J Crit Care. 60:111–115. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Lin HY: The severe COVID-19: A sepsis induced by viral infection? And its immunomodulatory therapy. Chin J Traumatol. 23:190–195. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Gabarre P, Dumas G, Dupont T, Darmon M, Azoulay E and Zafrani L: Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 46:1339–1348. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Prasitlumkum N, Chokesuwattanaskul R, Thongprayoon C, Bathini T, Vallabhajosyula S and Cheungpasitporn W: Incidence of myocardial injury in COVID-19-infected patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diseases. 8(40)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Klok FA, Kruip MJHA, van der Meer NJM, Arbous MS, Gommers DAMPJ, Kant KM, Kaptein FHJ, van Paassen J, Stals MAM, Huisman MV and Endeman H: Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res. 191:145–147. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Vogrig A, Gigli GL, Bnà C and Morassi M: Stroke in patients with COVID-19: Clinical and neuroimaging characteristics. Neurosci Lett. 743(135564)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Wang S, Zhang Q, Wang P, Ye H, Jing X, Zhang Z, Zhu S, Luo T and Zheng Z: Clinical features of hypertensive patients with COVID-19 compared with a normotensive group: Single-center experience in China. Open Med (Wars). 16:367–374. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Lippi G, Wong J and Henry BM: Hypertension in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A pooled analysis. Pol Arch Intern Med. 130:304–309. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Sisnieguez CE, Espeche WG and Salazar MR: Arterial hypertension and the risk of severity and mortality of COVID-19. Eur Respir J. 55(2001148)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Sakurai K, Chubachi S, Asakura T, Namkoong H, Tanaka H, Azekawa S, Shimada T, Otake S, Nakagawara K, Fukushima T, et al: Prognostic significance of hypertension history and blood pressure on admission in Japanese patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Integrative analysis from the Japan COVID-19 task force. Hypertens Res. 47:639–648. 2024.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Zhang V, Fisher M, Hou W, Zhang L and Duong TQ: Incidence of new-onset hypertension post-COVID-19: Comparison with influenza. Hypertension. 80:2135–2148. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-December 2024
Volume 4 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 2754-3242
Online ISSN:2754-1304

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Katić A and Rizvanović N: Predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19: A retrospective cohort study. Med Int 4: 74, 2024.
APA
Katić, A., & Rizvanović, N. (2024). Predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19: A retrospective cohort study. Medicine International, 4, 74. https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.198
MLA
Katić, A., Rizvanović, N."Predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19: A retrospective cohort study". Medicine International 4.6 (2024): 74.
Chicago
Katić, A., Rizvanović, N."Predictive significance of hypertension in the incidence of complications in critically ill patients with COVID‑19: A retrospective cohort study". Medicine International 4, no. 6 (2024): 74. https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2024.198