Autophagy prevents doxorubicin‑induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 14, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2055
- Pages: 1975-1981
Abstract
Introduction
Osteosarcoma is the most common type of primary malignant bone tumor in children and adolescents. According to a study in 2005, >400 novel cases of pediatric osteosarcoma are diagnosed each year in the USA (1). Osteosarcoma is mainly treated with chemotherapy or surgical excision, but as the prognosis of unresectable or recurrent cases is poor, novel therapies for the treatment of this type of tumor are currently being developed (2). Numerous agents have been used to treat osteosarcoma over the last 30 years and overall survival has exceeded 50%. These agents include high-dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide, which has now been sufficient cumulative experience for patients with osteosarcoma (3).
Autophagy is a process of selective degradation of cellular components. There are three major types of autophagy described, which include macroautophagy, microautophagy and chaperone-mediated autophagy (4). At present, the most important type of autophagy is macroautophagy. Macroautophagy, which is referred to as autophagy in the present study, is a nonspecific degradation system that mediates the clearance of long-lived cytoplasmic proteins, including aggregate-prone proteins, certain pathogens and organelles (5–8). In mammalian cells, autophagosome formation begins with a nucleation step, then they expand and fuse to form complete double membrane vesicles termed autophagosomes. Autophagosomes fuse with lysosomes and the contents of the autophagosomes are degraded (9). In this process, two important ubiquitin-like conjugation processes are involved. The first is conjugation of autophagy-related protein (Atg)12 to Atg5 and the second is conjugation of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3; also known as MAP-LC3 or Atg8) to phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and the two processes are essential for autophagosome formation (10). Notably, autophagy contributes to the maintenance cellular homeostasis and acts as a housekeeping survival mechanism in different harmful conditions, including starvation and endoplasmic reticulum stress (11). A study suggested that autophagy may be important in regulatingof cancer development and progression, and in determining the response of tumor cells to anticancer therapy. However, the role of autophagy in these processes is complicated and depends on the circumstances (12). Autophagy and apoptosis regulate cell fate and are critical in development, normal physiology and in numerous diseases. Although there are more marked differences between these two processes, they can be regulated by the samegene, such as Bcl- (13). A study suggested that there is crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in certain situations, for example the autophagy induced by starvation may be inhibited by caspase-mediated cleavage of beclin1 and the fragment of the cleaved beclin1 translocates to the mitochondria and induces apoptosis (14). Additionally, autophagic degradation of active caspase-8 inhibits apoptosis (15). Thus, the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy by each other is complicated and the mechanism is unclear.
Dox is a chemotherapeutic agent that activates p53 to induce apoptosis (16). Dox was widely used for treatment of malignancies and exerts a range of effects on the structural and functional properties of tumor cells, ultimately leading to cell death. Although the direct effects of Dox in the damage of DNA have been well studied, the sequence of biochemical events that mediate cell death in response to Dox remains unclear (17).
The present study focused on the role of autophagy in the Dox-induced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells. The study also investigated whether a combination of autophagy inhibitors and Dox enhanced apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Atg7 small interfering (si)RNA plasmid was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA; sc-29918). Dox and 3-methyladenine (3-MA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) were purchased from Gibco-BRL (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The antibodies anti-nucleoporin p62 antibody (sc-25523; secondary antibody rabbit) anti- cytochrome c antibody (sc-13156; secondary antibody mouse), anti-MAP LC3β antibody (sc-376404; secondary antibody mouse), anti-caspase-3 antibody (sc-65496; secondary antibody mouse), cleaved caspase-3 p11 antibody (sc-22171-R; secondary antibody rabbit) and ATG7 antibody (sc-33211; secondary antibody rabbit) were all purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
Cell proliferation assays
U2OS and Saos-2 human cells (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS and cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cell viability was determined by a MTT [12 μl, 5 mg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] assay. The U2OS and Saos-2 human cells were cultured at a density of 1–1.5×104 cells/well in 96-well plates. Each group was replicated in six separate wells. DMSO was used for the untreated/control cells. Following treatment (0, 100, 250 or 500 nM) Dox, the MTT reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well for 4 h. Subsequently, the contents of each well was dissolved in 150 μl dimethylsulfoxide. The absorbance was recorded at a wavelength of 490 nm using an ELISA reader (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lake, NJ, USA).
Transfection
Prior to the transfection, the cells were grown to 40% confluence in each dish. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the U2OS and Saos-2 cells were transfected with 40 nmol/l control siRNA or Atg7 siRNA using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 36 h, the cells were harvested for western blotting.
Western blot analysis
For each assay, the U2OS and Saos-2 cells were washed with cold PBS twice and then 120 μl radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM sodium fluoride (NaF), 1% Triton X-100, 1% NP-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 μg/ml leupeptin and 1 μg/ml pepstatin A] was added to each dish following treatment. The lysates were harvested into 1.5-ml tubes and agitated in a cold room (4°C) for 20 min. Subsequently, the cell lysates were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 15 min, and then the supernatants were harvested. The protein concentrations were detected by a bicinchoninic acid assay (Sigma Aldrich). A total of 60 μg protein was used for the western blotting. The lysates were separated by 10% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, the proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and they were blocked with 5% (w/v) skimmed milk in buffer [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 100 mM NaCl and 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20] for 30 min at room temperature (25°C). The membranes were incubated in the primary antibodies overnight in a cold room. The following day, the membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline and Tween-20. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with the secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The semi-quantitation of the proteins was analyzed with a Tanon Gel Imager system (Tanon, Shanghai, China).
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) analysis
JC-1 staining to detect the MMP of each group was conducted by flow cytometry, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Following treatment, the U2OS and Saos-2 cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and resuspended in PBS at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. The U2OS and Saos-2 cells were then stained with 2.5 μl JC-1 (1 mg/ml) and incubated in the dark at 37°C for 1.5 h. The JC-1 positive cells were subsequently detected by a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Statistical analysis
Data are representative of three independent experiments and were analyzed by t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Dox inhibits the growth of U2OS and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cells in a dose-dependent manner
Dox is widely used for the treatment of numerous types of tumor (17–21). Initially, the study aimed to identify whether Dox inhibits the growth of the U2OS and Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell lines. The MTT results demonstrated that Dox reduced the cell viability of the two U2OS and Saos-2 cell types in dose-dependent manner compared with that of the untreated cells (Fig. 1).
Dox induces apoptosis in U2OS and Saos-2 cells
As mentioned previously, Dox inhibited the cell growth of the two osteosarcoma cell lines. Subsequently, the levels of apoptosis-associated proteins in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells treated with Dox were detected to investigate whether growth inhibition was associated with apoptosis. The levels of the mitochondrial apoptosis-associated proteins caspase-3 and cytochrome c were detected.
As shown in Fig. 2A and B, Dox increased the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cytochrome c in the U2OS cells compared with those in the untreated cells. A second osteosarcoma cell line, Saos-2, was used to confirm the aforementioned results. Similar results were observed in the Saos-2 cells (Fig. 2D and E). Furthermore, the MMP was measured in the two cell lines by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 2C and F, Dox induced a significant loss in the MMP of the two cells lines.
These results indicated that Dox induces apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells through the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.
Dox induces autophagy in U2OS and Saos-2 cells
In addition to apoptosis, it has been reported that Dox induces autophagy in tumor cells (22). Thus, the levels of autophagy-associated proteins in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells treated with Dox were subsequently detected. LC3 (the mammalian equivalent of yeast Atg8) and p62 are the two major markers of autophagy. When autophagy occurs, the quantity of LC3-II increases and the expression levels of p62 decrease. Western blotting demonstrated that the levels of these two proteins in U2OS and Saos-2 cells treated with Dox were altered compared with those in the untreated cells. As shown in Fig. 3, Dox elevated the expression levels of LC3-II and reduced the expression levels of p62 in U2OS and Saos-2 cells.
These results indicated that Dox induces autophagy in U2OS and Saos-2 cells.
Inhibition of autophagy by Atg7 siRNA or an autophagy inhibitor enhances the apoptosis induced by Dox in U2OS and Saos-2 cells
Numerous studies have shown that autophagy is important in the apoptosis induced by antitumor agents, but the role varies with different agents and types of tumor (12,23). Atg7 siRNA and an autophagy inhibitor were used to investigate the role of autophagy in Dox-induced apoptosis. As shown the Fig. 4A, siAtg7 reduced the expression levels of Atg7 in the U2OS cells compared with those in the control cells. The MTT results demonstrated that Atg7 siRNA intensifies the growth inhibition induced by Dox in the U2OS cells (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the Atg7 siRNA aggravated the loss of MMP in the U2OS cells (Fig. 4C). Subsequently, the levels of the apoptosis-associated proteins, cleaved capase-3 and cytochrome c, were detected. The Atg7 siRNA further increased the expression levels of the apoptosis-associated proteins, cleaved capase-3 and cytochrome c, induced by Dox in the U2OS cells (Fig. 4D and E).
Subsequently, the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA was used to confirm the role of autophagy in Dox-induced apoptosis. The combination of 3-MA and Dox also intensified the growth inhibition of the U2OS cells induced by Dox (Fig. 5A). As shown in Fig. 5B, C and D, the combination of 3-MA and Dox further increased the expression levels of the apoptosis-associated proteins cleaved capase-3 and cytochrome c and loss of MMP induced by Dox in the U2OS cells.
Saos-2 cells were used to confirm these results and similar results were observed (Figs. 6 and 7).
These results in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells indicated that autophagy is important in Dox-induced apoptosis and the inhibition of autophagy further increases the cytotoxicity of Dox in osteosarcoma cells.
Discussion
Osteosarcoma is common type of primary bone tumor. Due to the high metastatic potential and the common acquisition of chemotherapeutic resistance in osteosarcoma, the clinical outcome is poor (18). Chemotherapy for osteosarcoma is administered in neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Clinical treatment commonly uses chemotherapy for the treatment of osteosarcoma, in order to avoid amputation. Dox is a common conventional chemotherapeutic drug used for the treatment of osteosarcoma (19). Studies have indicated that Dox inhibits the cell growth of human leukemia cells (17) and breast cancer cell lines (20). In order to investigate the effect of Dox on osteosarcoma, the present study investigated the effect of Dox on the cell viability of two human osteosarcoma cell lines, U2OS and Saos-2, by MTT assay. The results demonstrated that Dox inhibited the cell proliferation of the U2OS and Saos-2 cells in a dose-dependent manner.
A previous study reported that Dox induced apoptosis by increasing the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 (18). Cleaved caspase-3 is an activated form of caspase-3, and it leads to cell death. Therefore, in order to detect whether Dox induces the apoptosis of the two osteosarcoma cell lines, the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cytochrome c were detected by western blot analysis of the U2OS and Saos-2 cells. The results showed that Dox increased the expression levels of cleaved caspase-3 and cytochrome c in a dose-dependent manner in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells. Additionally, the MMP loss was measured in the two cell lines using flow cytometry. Dox evidently induced the loss of the MMP in the two cells lines.
Although the present study demonstrated that Dox induces apoptosis of U2OS and Saos-2 cells, the effect of the treatment requires enhancement. Therefore, the other functions of Dox were investigated. Fong et al (22) identified that Dox induced increased expression levels of LC3 in the A2780 epithelial ovarian cancer cell line. LC3, a homologue of Apg8p that is essential for autophagy in yeast, is a classical marker of autophagy. In particular, LC3-II is the first mammalian protein identified that specifically associates with autophagsome membranes (24). In order to determine whether Dox has an effect on autophagy in U2OS and Saos-2 cells, the expression levels of LC3 were detected by western blotting and it was demonstrated that Dox induced the increased expression levels of LC3 in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells. In addition, Dox reduced the levels of another autophagy marker, p62. All the results showed that Dox induced autophagy in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells.
A growing number of studies have reported crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy (25). The correlation between them is complicated. A number of studies have provided evidence that autophagy serves as a survival pathway in tumor cells treated with anticancer drugs and proposed a rationale for the use of autophagy inhibitors in combination with therapies designed to induce apoptosis in human cancers (26,27). Therefore, autophagy inhibition represents a major therapeutic target for chemosensitization (28). Although the present study demonstrated that Dox induced apoptosis and autophagy in U2OS and Saos-2 cells, the correlation between apoptosis and autophagy induced by Dox is unknown. In order to elucidate the correlation, Dox was used in combination with the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA and Atg7 siRNA to detect the cell proliferation and the expression levels of apoptosis-associated proteins induced by Dox in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells. As expected, the results showed that the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA and Atg7 siRNA significantly enhanced the cell proliferation inhibition and notably increased the expression levels of the apoptosis proteins cleaved caspase-3 and cytochrome c induced by Dox in the U2OS and Saos-2 cells. These results demonstrated that autophagy is preventative against the apoptosis induced by Dox in U2OS and Saos-2 cells.
The present study provides significant data indicating that inhibition of autophagy may enhance the tumor cell proliferation inhibition and apoptosis of U2OS and Saos-2 cells induced by Dox. Thus, activation of autophagy may be involved in the resistance to apoptosis of U2OS and Saos-2 cells. Autophagy may enable tumor cells adapt to metabolic stress and promote cell survival during apoptosis. In conclusion, the present study showed that inhibition of autophagy may be a novel strategy to increase the efficacy of anticancer drugs in the treatment of U2OS and Saos-2 cells.
References
Chou AJ, Merola PR, Wexler LH, et al: Treatment of osteosarcoma at first recurrence after contemporary therapy: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 104:2214–2221. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakase M, Inui M, Okumura K, Kamei T, Nakamura S and Tagawa T: p53 gene therapy of human osteosarcoma using a transferrin-modified cationic liposome. Mol Cancer Ther. 4:625–631. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Janeway KA and Grier HE: Sequelae of osteosarcoma medical therapy: a review of rare acute toxicities and late effects. Lancet Oncol. 11:670–678. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang Z and Klionsky DJ: Eaten alive: a history of macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol. 12:814–822. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klionsky DJ: The molecular machinery of autophagy: unanswered questions. J Cell Sci. 118:7–18. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Levine B and Klionsky DJ: Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell. 6:463–477. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mizushima N: The pleiotropic role of autophagy: from protein metabolism to bactericide. Cell Death Differ. 12(Suppl 2): 1535–1541. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rubinsztein DC, Gestwicki JE, Murphy LO and Klionsky DJ: Potential therapeutic applications of autophagy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 6:304–312. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang WP and Klionsky DJ: Autophagy in yeast: a review of the molecular machinery. Cell Struct Funct. 27:409–420. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Luo S and Rubinsztein DC: Apoptosis blocks Beclin 1-dependent autophagosome synthesis: an effect rescued by Bcl-xL. Cell Death Differ. 17:268–277. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Del Bello B, Toscano M, Moretti D and Maellaro E: Cisplatin-induced apoptosis inhibits autophagy, which acts as a pro-survival mechanism in human melanoma cells. PLoS One. 8:e572362013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hippert MM, O’Toole PS and Thorburn A: Autophagy in cancer: good, bad, or both? Cancer Res. 66:9349–9351. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thorburn A: Apoptosis and autophagy: regulatory connections between two supposedly different processes. Apoptosis. 13:1–9. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Djavaheri-Mergny M, Maiuri MC and Kroemer G: Cross talk between apoptosis and autophagy by caspase-mediated cleavage of Beclin 1. Oncogene. 29:1717–1719. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hou W, Han J, Lu C, Goldstein LA and Rabinowich H: Autophagic degradation of active caspase-8: a crosstalk mechanism between autophagy and apoptosis. Autophagy. 6:891–900. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T and Housman DE: p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell. 74:957–967. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu R, Shtil AA, Tan TH, Roninson IB and Kong AN: Adriamycin activates c-jun N-terminal kinase in human leukemia cells: a relevance to apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 107:73–81. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Spina A, Sorvillo L, Di Maiolo F, et al: Inorganic phosphate enhances sensitivity of human osteosarcoma U2OS cells to doxorubicin via a p53-dependent pathway. J Cell Physiol. 228:198–206. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gill J, Ahluwalia MK, Geller D and Gorlick R: New targets and approaches in osteosarcoma. Pharmacol Ther. 137:89–99. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Radetzki S, Köhne CH, von Haefen C, et al: The apoptosis promoting Bcl-2 homologues Bak and Nbk/Bik overcome drug resistance in Mdr-1-negative and Mdr-1-overexpressing breast cancer cell lines. Oncogene. 21:227–238. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tarquini F, Tiribuzi R, Crispoltoni L, et al: Caspase 3 activation and PARP cleavage in lymphocytes from newborn babies of diabetic mothers with unbalanced glycaemic control. Cell Biochem Funct. 32:87–95. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fong MY, Jin S, Rane M, Singh RK, Gupta R and Kakar SS: Withaferin A synergizes the therapeutic effect of doxorubicin through ROS-mediated autophagy in ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 7:e422652012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li H, Jin X, Zhang Z, Xing Y and Kong X: Inhibition of autophagy enhances apoptosis induced by the PI3K/AKT/mTor inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 in renal cell carcinoma cells. Cell Biochem Funct. 31:427–433. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kabeya Y, Mizushima N, Ueno T, et al: LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 19:5720–5728. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang R, Zeh HJ, Lotze MT and Tang D: The Beclin 1 network regulates autophagy and apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 18:571–580. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhong JT, Xu Y, Yi HW, et al: The BH3 mimetic S1 induces autophagy through ER stress and disruption of Bcl-2/Beclin 1 interaction in human glioma U251 cells. Cancer Lett. 323:180–187. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chang Z, Shi G, Jin J, et al: Dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor NVP-BEZ235-induced apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines is enhanced by inhibitors of autophagy. Int J Mol Med. 31:1449–1456. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fimia GM and Piacentini M: Regulation of autophagy in mammals and its interplay with apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 67:1581–1588. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |