Effects of human β-defensin-3 on biofilm formation‑regulating genes dltB and icaA in Staphylococcus aureus
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 10, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2309
- Pages: 825-831
Abstract
Introduction
Numerous bacteria attach to the surfaces of organisms or medical implants to secrete an extracellular matrix, also known as a biofilm, that forms a highly structured and complex community. These bacteria carry a specific infectious phenotype different from that of planktonic bacteria, which may include degrees of antibiotic resistance. Infections due to bacterial biofilms may be characterized by repeated refractory episodes with no effective cure (1). In recent years, departments of trauma surgery worldwide have reported a dramatic increase in the incidence of Staphylococcus (S.) aureus biofilm infections associated with the use of medical implants (2), and have also been detected in 93.5% of chronic wounds (3).
S. aureus bacteria embedded within the biofilm may have a resistance to antibiotics that is 10–1,000X stronger than their free-floating counterparts (4). A number of antibiotics, including aminoglycoside antibiotics, may even induce bacterial biofilm formation (4). Therefore there is an urgent clinical requirement to identify a novel effective measure to treat S. aureus biofilm infections. Insights into the mechanism of action of S. aureus biofilm infections and methods to intervene in biofilm formation may be an effective way to control S. aureus biofilm infections. The dltABCD operon of S. aureus is responsible for D-alanine activation and synthesis into teichoic acid (5–7). S. aureus bacteria that are deficient in the dlt operon are unable to attach to the surfaces of polyethylene and glass, and therefore are not able to form biofilms (8). The ica operon (including icaA, icaB, icaC and icaD) encodes the synthesis of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) (9–14), which mediates biofilm formation. The location and products of the ica operon and polysaccharide produced by Ica protein have been extensively studied in vitro. Biofilm formation depends on ica gene expression and PIA synthesis (15–20). Therefore, an understanding of the effects of antibiotics on the expression of biofilm formation-related genes, such as dlt and ica, are of notable importance in the control of S. aureus infections.
Human β-defensin 3 (hBD-3) is a 45-amino acid peptide that is considered the most promising of its class in the prevention and treatment of implantation-associated infections (21). It has a strong lethal effect on S. aureus compared with vancomycin and other antibiotics at low concentrations and can have a strong bactericidal effect (22). The majority of studies of the effects of hBD-3 on the dlt and ica operons have been limited to planktonic S. aureus, while the effect of hBD-3 on these genes in S. aureus biofilms has not been well investigated. The present study examined the effects of hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin on the biofilm formation-regulating genes, icaA and dltB, during S. aureus adhesion and biofilm formation.
Materials and methods
Stock solutions
Stock solutions of hBD-3 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were reconstituted in 10 mM acetic acid to a concentration of 1.0 mg/ml. Stock solutions of vancomycin (K.K, Seishin Laboratories, Eli Lilly, Kobe, Japan) and clindamycin (Hainan Shuangcheng Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Hainan, China) were dissolved in distilled water to a concentration of 10 mg/ml.
S. aureus cultures
S. aureus ATCC 25923 standard strain, obtained from Daping Hospital, the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China), were grown in tryptone soya broth (TSB) at 37°C under vigorous shaking. The minimum inhibitory concentrations for this strain are 8 mg/l for hBD-3 (23–26), 0.5 mg/l for vancomycin and 0.25 mg/l for clindamycin (27).
Biofilm formation
Biofilm formation of S. aureus was conducted in 96-well polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plates as previously described (28). Briefly, bacteria from overnight cultures were diluted 1:1,000, and 5 μl of these bacterial suspensions were added to each well containing 100 μl of the biofilm medium. The biofilm medium consisted of 0.5 ml TSB supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) glucose, with or without hBD-3 (8 mg/l), vancomycin (0.5 mg/l) or clindamycin (0.25 mg/l). As hBD-3 degrades gradually (29), hBD-3 was added again after 3 h.
Evaluation of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) via confocal scanning laser microscopy
Calcofluor white, a polysaccharide binding dye, has been used to stain the extracellular matrix of biofilms formed by bacteria (30). Therefore, to determine whether the adhered structures of S. aureus were encased in EPS, the biofilm was stained with 50 mM calcofluor white (Sigma). The staining was performed in duplicate for 15 min in the dark at room temperature, and slime production was then observed using confocal scanning laser microscopy (Leica Microsystems Heidelberg GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) detection of the changes in dltB and icaA transcription levels
To prepare the samples of total RNA, single colonies of S. aureus standard strain ATCC 25923 were inoculated in 5 ml TSB medium, into which 8 μg/ml hBD-3, 1 μg/ml vancomycin or 0.25 μg/ml clindamycin were added. S. aureus bacteria, which were adhered to the surface of the plate at 6 h and encased in a biofilm at 24 h, were collected and centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min. The bacteria were then resuspended in TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and subjected to high-speed shaking following the addition of special abrasive.
The subsequent procedures of RNA extraction were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The total RNA was examined on agarose gel, which demonstrated that the total RNA extracted from different phases treated with hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin were of high quality.
The mRNA levels of dlt and ica genes were measured using qPCR. The extracted RNAs were retro-transcribed to cDNAs in the presence of random primers (Table I) using reverse transcriptase AMV in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). L-lactate dehydrogenase (Ldh) was used as an endogenous control. qPCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR Green Master mix (Takara) on an ABI 9700 system (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The PCR conditions were as follows: 95°C for 15 sec, and 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The values were normalized to the expression of the test gene using the 2−ΔΔCT method (31). The threshold cycles (CTs) were recorded for all of the samples for the target gene and the endogenous control Ldh. A melting curve analysis was performed for each run. The relative gene expression of the target gene was calculated as ΔCT, determined by subtracting the CT of the Ldh gene from the CT of the target gene. Differential expression of the target gene is demonstrated as −ΔΔCT, determined by subtracting the ΔCT (mean value) of the test samples from that of the control samples.
Table IBase sequences and predicted sizes of polymerase chain reaction products for dltB, icaA and Ldh specific oligonucleotide primers used in the present study. |
Image and statistical analyses
Biofilm images were captured using Image-Pro Plus Version 6.0 (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA). The slime-stained area and the integrated optical density were measured. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The χ2 test and t-test were performed with SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Effects of hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin on S. aureus biofilm formation
As indicated from the areas of slime generated from single-cell colonies determined via Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA) processing, it was identified that following 6 h of treatment, hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin were associated with significant increases in the secretion of slime by S. aureus, and the area of each experimental group was larger and notably different from that of the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 1 and 2). A total of 24 h following incubation with hBD-3, vancomycin or clindamycin, the areas of S. aureus biofilms in the three experimental groups decreased significantly relative to that of the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 2).
Effects of hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin on transcription levels of dltB and icaA
qPCR was performed to detect the effects of hBD-3, vancomycin or clindamycin on the transcription levels of the dltB gene in S. aureus strain ATCC 25923, which adhered to a surface at 6 h and were encased in a biofilm at 24 h. The total RNA was examined on an agarose gel, which demonstrated that the total RNA extracted from different phages treated with hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin was of a high quality (Fig. 3).
The melting and qPCR amplification curves were used to verify the quality of qPCR and the expression levels of dltB and Ldh (Fig. 4A and B). The results demonstrated that compared with the control group, incubation with hBD-3 caused no significant change in the transcription level of the dltB gene in biofilms at 6 and 24 h of bacterial growth. The transcription levels of the dltB gene in the bacterial biofilms incubated with either vancomycin or clindamycin were significantly elevated at 24 h (P<0.05; Fig. 4C).
Since the icaADBC genes share a common promoter, the present study aimed to detect the transcription of icaA to represent the transcription level of the ica operon in S. aureus biofilms. The melting and qPCR amplification curves indicated the quality of the qPCR and the expression levels of icaA and Ldh (Fig. 5A and B). The surface-adherent bacteria incubated with hBD-3 for 6 h had a higher icaA transcription level than the control group (P<0.05; Fig. 5C). This effect lasted, as the ica transcription levels remained elevated significantly at 24 h (P<0.05). The icaA transcription levels marginally increased in the surface-adherent bacteria incubated with vancomycin and clindamycin at 6 h (P>0.05) and enhanced significantly at 24 h (P<0.05; Fig. 5C).
Discussion
In the present study, the antimicrobials hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin were selected to examine their effects on S. aureus biofilm formation. The progression from the initial adhesion of bacteria to a surface to the formation of biofilms is a dynamic process (32). The results revealed that all of the antimicrobials promoted the secretion of EPS by the bacteria during the initial adhesion stage, each led to significantly attenuated biofilm formation in the biofilm formation stage. However, the data revealed that the underlying regulatory mechanisms of hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin on the attenuation of biofilm formation are not the same. Vancomycin and clindamycin induced a moderate increase in icaA transcription during bacterial adhesion, and such induction was significantly more pronounced during biofilm formation compared with the untreated control. By contrast, hBD-3 stimulated icaA upregulation throughout the entire process, which suggests a complex regulatory function for hBD-3 in biofilm formation.
The dltABCD operon is the predominant functional gene cluster that regulates S. aureus adhesion, and is capable of markedly modifying surface charges on the teichoic acid molecules that are attached to the cell wall of the bacteria (33). These modifications allow the bacteria to bind to a bare polymer surface through hydrophobic interactions and initiate the process of biofilm formation. The dlt operon of S. aureus may be regulated by cations (34) or respond to cationic antimicrobial peptides through the graRS regulatory system, and has a key role in bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides (29,35–37). The present study demonstrated that vancomycin and clindamycin significantly induced the upregulation of dltB transcription in biofilms. However, unlike these antibiotics and other cationic antimicrobial peptides, hBD-3 did not have a significant affect on the transcription level of the dltB gene during either bacterial adhesion or biofilm formation. Previous studies have reported similar findings concerning the effects of hBD-3 on planktonic S. aureus (36,38), however to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to demonstrate the role of hBD-3 on the S. aureus dlt operon in biofilm formation, which is the phenotype that causes the majority of clinically refractory infections. Further studies are required to elucidate the underlying differences in the inhibitory mechanisms among hBD-3, vancomycin and clindamycin on biofilm formation.
The formation of the S. aureus biofilm is a complex process, and external factors differ in their effects on signal transduction mechanisms. In the present study, vancomycin and clindamycin induced sustained expression of the dlt and ica genes, which have key roles in biofilm formation. Consequently, vancomycin and clindamycin may be harnessed to induce biofilm formation. Attenuated biofilm formation in bacteria treated with vancomycin or clindamycin may be attributable to their bactericidal action that may have led to an absolute reduction in the number of bacteria and consequential decline in the area of biofilms. By contrast, hBD-3 exhibited notably more complicated effects on the target biofilm-related genes. It had no affect on the dlt operon, despite a significant upregulation of the ica operon in the adhesion and biofilm formation stages. This result provides genetic evidence that hBD-3 has a different role in S. aureus biofilm formation from that of vancomycin and clindamycin. Biofilm formation is an important mechanism for antibiotic resistance of S. aureus, and dlt genes have also been implicated in the resistance of S. aureus (39,40). Therefore, the present study may also provide clinically useful information for understanding and thus controlling antibiotic resistance of S. aureus.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 30700177 and 81071459) and the Foundation of Chongqing (grant nos. CSTC and 2009AC5022).
References
Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Stoner SM and Baddour LM: Risk factor analysis of permanent pacemaker infection. Clin Infect Dis. 45:166–173. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, Madsen KG, Phipps R, Krogfelt K, Høiby N and Givskov M: Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 16:2–10. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Costerton JW, Stewart PS and Greenberg EP: Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284:1318–1322. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffman LR, D’Argenio DA, MacCoss MJ, Zhang Z, Jones RA and Miller SI: Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation. Nature. 436:1171–1175. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Debabov DV, Heaton MP, Zhang Q, Stewart KD, Lambalot RH and Neuhaus FC: The D-Alanyl carrier protein in Lactobacillus casei: cloning, sequencing, and expression of dltC. J Bacteriol. 178:3869–3876. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Neuhaus FC, Heaton MP, Debabov DV and Zhang Q: The dlt operon in the biosynthesis of D-alanyl-lipoteichoic acid in Lactobacillus casei. Microb Drug Resist. 2:77–84. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neuhaus FC and Baddiley J: A continuum of anionic charge: structures and functions of D-alanyl-teichoic acids in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 67:686–723. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gross M, Cramton SE, Götz F and Peschel A: Key role of teichoic acid net charge in Staphylococcus aureus colonization of artificial surfaces. Infect Immun. 69:3423–3426. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Caiazza NC and O’Toole GA: Alpha-toxin is required for biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 185:3214–3217. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Frees D, Chastanet A, Qazi S, Sørensen K, Hill P, Msadek T and Ingmer H: Clp ATPases are required for stress tolerance, intracellular replication and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 54:1445–1462. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Götz F: Staphylococcus and biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 43:1367–1378. 2002. | |
Pratten J, Foster SJ, Chan PF, Wilson M and Nair SP: Staphylococcus aureus accessory regulators: expression within biofilms and effect on adhesion. Microbes Infect. 3:633–637. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Valle J, Toledo-Arana A, Berasain C, Ghigo JM, Amorena B, Penadés JR and Lasa I: SarA and not sigmaB is essential for biofilm development by Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 48:1075–1087. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vuong C, Saenz HL, Götz F and Otto M: Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 182:1688–1693. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW and Götz F: The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 67:5427–5433. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mack D, Nedelmann M, Krokotsch A, Schwarzkopf A, Heesemann J and Laufs R: Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. Infect Immun. 62:3244–3253. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, Leopold K, Hartmann R, Egge H and Laufs R: The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis. J Bacteriol. 178:175–183. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mack D, Riedewald J, Rohde H, Magnus T, Feucht HH, Elsner HA, Laufs R and Rupp ME: Essential functional role of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in hemagglutination. Infect Immun. 67:1004–1008. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
McKenney D, Hübner J, Muller E, Wang Y, Goldmann DA and Pier GB: The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin. Infect Immun. 66:4711–4720. 1998. | |
O’Gara JP: ica and beyond: biofilm mechanisms and regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 270:179–188. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Warnke PH, Springer IN, Russo PA, Wiltfang J, Essig H, Kosmahl M, Sherry E and Acil Y: Innate immunity in human bone. Bone. 38:400–408. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Harder J, Bartels J, Christophers E and Schroder JM: Isolation and characterization of human beta-defensin-3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic. J Biol Chem. 276:5707–5713. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Joly S, Maze C, McCray PB Jr and Guthmiller JM: Human beta-defensins 2 and 3 demonstrate strain-selective activity against oral microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 42:1024–1029. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maisetta G, Batoni G, Esin S, Florio W, Bottai D, Favilli F and Campa M: In vitro bactericidal activity of human beta-defensin 3 against multidrug-resistant nosocomial strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 50:806–809. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sahly H, Schubert S, Harder J, Rautenberg P, Ullmann U, Schröder J and Podschun R: Burkholderia is highly resistant to human beta-defensin 3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:1739–1741. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maisetta G, Batoni G, Esin S, Luperini F, Pardini M, Bottai D, Florio W, Giuca MR, Gabriele M and Campa M: Activity of human beta-defensin 3 alone or combined with other antimicrobial agents against oral bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 47:3349–3351. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brogden KA: Antimicrobial peptides: pore formers or metabolic inhibitors in bacteria? Nat Rev Microbiol. 3:238–250. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van der Plas MJ, Jukema GN, Wai SW, Dogterom-Ballering HC, Lagendijk EL, van Gulpen C, van Dissel JT, Bloemberg GV and Nibbering PH: Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 61:117–122. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Li M, Cha DJ, Lai Y, Villaruz AE, Sturdevant DE and Otto M: The antimicrobial peptide-sensing system aps of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 66:1136–1147. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neut D, Hendriks JG, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC and Busscher HJ: Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and slime excretion on antibiotic-loaded bone cement. Acta Orthop. 76:109–114. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. | |
Fu W, Forster T, Mayer O, Curtin JJ, Lehman SM and Donlan RM: Bacteriophage cocktail for the prevention of biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa on catheters in an in vitro model system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 54:397–404. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Peschel A, Otto M, Jack RW, Kalbacher H, Jung G and Götz F: Inactivation of the dlt operon in Staphylococcus aureus confers sensitivity to defensins, protegrins, and other antimicrobial peptides. J Biol Chem. 274:8405–8410. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Koprivnjak T, Mlakar V, Swanson L, Fournier B, Peschel A and Weiss JP: Cation-induced transcriptional regulation of the dlt operon of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 188:3622–3630. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li M, Lai Y, Villaruz AE, Cha DJ, Sturdevant DE and Otto M: Gram-positive three-component antimicrobial peptide-sensing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:9469–9474. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bera A, Biswas R, Herbert S, Kulauzovic E, Weidenmaier C, Peschel A and Götz F: Influence of wall teichoic acid on lysozyme resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 189:280–283. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kraus D and Peschel A: Staphylococcus aureus evasion of innate antimicrobial defense. Future Microbiol. 3:437–451. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Herbert S, Bera A, Nerz C, Kraus D, Peschel A, Goerke C, Meehl M, Cheung A and Götz F: Molecular basis of resistance to muramidase and cationic antimicrobial peptide activity of lysozyme in staphylococci. PloS Pathog. 3:e1022007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuroda M, Kuwahara-Arai K and Hiramatsu K: Identification of the up- and down-regulated genes in vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains Mu3 and Mu50 by cDNA differential hybridization method. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 269:485–490. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cui L, Lian JQ, Neoh HM, Reyes E and Hiramatsu K: DNA microarray-based identification of genes associated with glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 49:3404–3413. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |