Total alkaloids of Rubus alceifolius Poir inhibit tumor angiogenesis through suppression of the Notch signaling pathway in a mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 20, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.2702
- Pages: 357-361
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. The HCC incidence rate is increasing more rapidly than most other types of cancers due to the increasing prevalence of hepatitis B and C viral infections (1,2). Therapies for HCC include surgery, radiofrequency ablation and chemotherapy. At present, no drugs are available to prevent or reduce tumor spread and/or recurrence, which severely affects prognosis and survival. HCC is the only type of cancer in which ‘conventional’ chemotherapeutics must be avoided, due to the underlying liver damage. Thus, a novel drug for the treatment of HCC is urgently required.
Tumor angiogenesis is a complex process in which new blood vessels are formed in response to interactions between tumor cells and endothelial cells (ECs) (3,4). Angiogenesis has an important role in cancer growth and metastasis, with tumors able to grow autonomously to a size of 2±3 mm3, but incapable of growing beyond this size without a blood supply (5–9). Tumor cells continuously stimulate the formation of new blood vessels to grow. New blood vessels that surround tumor tissues provide a gateway for the tumor cells to enter the vascular system and metastasize to distant organs. Thus, the inhibition of angiogenesis has been proposed to suppress tumor growth and metastasis (10). An increasing number of studies have revealed that tumor cells secrete angiogenic growth factors to stimulate EC proliferation and to induce angiogenesis (6). Among them, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most potent angiogenic factors and it is overexpressed in numerous types of human cancer (11).
Genetic studies have shown that Notch signaling has a critical role in vascular formation during early embryonic development (12–14). Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved pathway, which regulates cell fate decisions during the embryonic development of vertebrates and invertebrates (15). There are four mammalian Notch genes, Notch1-4, and five ligands, jagged 1, jagged 2, delta-like ligand (DLL) 1, DLL3 and DLL4 (12,16,17). Notch signaling has been reported to have a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis and is a novel target for anti-angiogenic therapy. Studies have demonstrated that the activation of the Notch signaling pathway inhibits angiogenesis. Activated Notch1 and Notch4 have been reported to decrease the expression of VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 2, resulting in decreased human EC proliferation in response to VEGF (18). Human ECs transduced with DLL4 have been shown to exhibit decreased VEGF-induced proliferation and migration, as well as a significant reduction in the expression of VEGFR2 and its coreceptor neuropilin-1, suggesting that DLL4 is an inhibitor of angiogenesis (19). In addition, inhibiting jagged using an antisense oligomer in bovine ECs has been found to induce tube formation and collagen gel invasion in response to fibroblast growth factor, but not VEGF (20). Although Notch signaling has been reported to inhibit sprouting angiogenesis in these studies (18–20), most were performed in vitro. Thus, in vivo tumor angiogenesis assays are required to confirm these findings and to determine their physiological relevance.
Rubus alceifolius Poir is a natural product, which is used in Traditional Chinese Medicine in Southern regions of Fujian Province, China, to treat various types of hepatitis. In a previous study, our group identified that total alkaloids of Rubus alceifolius Poir (TARAP) promoted apoptosis in human HCC cells (21). However, the specific mechanism underlying the anticancer effect of TARAP in vivo has yet to be elucidated. In the present study, in order to further investigate the anticancer activity of TARAP, the effect of TARAP on tumor growth and its underlying molecular mechanisms were investigated in a HCC xenograft mouse model.
Materials and methods
Materials and reagents
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin, Trypsin-EDTA and TRIzol® reagent were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). SuperScript® II reverse transcriptase was purchased from Promega Corporation (Madison, WI, USA). Antibodies against cluster of differentiation (CD) 31 (human, pAb), VEGF-A (human, pAb), VEGFR2 (human, pAb), Notch (human, mAb), Dll4 (human, pAb) and jagged 1 (human, pAb) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). All antibodies were diluted 1:100. All other chemicals, unless otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
TARAP preparation
TARAP preparation was performed as described previously (21). The roots of Rubus alceifolius Poir were collected in Anxi (China) and were identified and authenticated at Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Fuzhou, China). The alkaloids were then extracted as follows: The herb powder (1 g) was extracted using 50 ml chloroform:methanol:ammonia solution (15:4:3) for 2 h in an ice bath, sonicated for 30 min, brought to room temperature and filtered. The filtered solution was collected and dessicated. The resultant residue was dissolved in 2 ml of 2% sulfuric acid solution and filtered. The filter paper and residue were re-washed with 2 ml of 2% sulfuric acid solution and buffer solution (pH 3.6). The buffer was then added to make a final volume of 50 ml, and the solution was saved for future use. Acid dye colorimetry was used to measure the total alkaloid content. The total alkaloid content was 0.81 mg alkaloid per gram of initial herb powder.
Cell culture and animals
HepG2 human HCC cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). Cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% (v/v) FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. Cells were subcultured to 80–90% confluency. Six-week-old male BALB/c athymic nude mice were purchased from Shanghai Si-Lai-Ke Experimental Animal Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Mice were housed at five mice per cage in a pathogen-free room in an environment with controlled temperature (22°C), humidity and a 12-h light/dark cycle with free access to water and a standard laboratory diet. All animal treatments were performed in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Fuzhou, China). The animal studies were approved by the Fujian Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine Animal Ethics Committee (Fuzhou, China).
In vivo tumor xenograft study
HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 4×106 cells mixed 1:1 with Matrigel™ and were subcutaneously injected in the right flank of the mice to initiate tumor growth. Seven days following xenograft implantation, when the tumors reached 3 mm in diameter, the mice were randomly divided into two groups (n=10) and were intragastrically administered 3 g/kg body weight TARAP or saline daily, five days a week for 21 days. At the end of the experiment, the animals were anaesthetized with ether and the mice were sacrificed by cervical vertebra dislocation, and the tumor tissue was removed. A section of the tumor was fixed in buffered formalin and the remaining sections were stored at −80°C for molecular analyses.
RNA extraction and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis
Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol Reagent. Oligo(dT)-primed RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA product (1 μl) was added to prepare the PCR reaction mixture containing 200 μM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2 and 1.25 U Platinum Taq polymerase for VEGF-A, VEGFR2, Notch, Dll4 or jagged1 with a Taq DNA polymerase. GAPDH was used as an internal control. Samples were analyzed using gel electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. DNA bands were analyzed using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc 2000 System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Tumor samples were fixed with 10% formaldehyde for 12 h and processed for the generation of paraffin-embedded tumor slides. Slides were subjected to antigen retrieval and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked using hydrogen peroxide. Sections were then incubated with CD31, VEGF-A, VEGFR2, Notch, Dll4 and jagged 1 antibodies diluted 1:100. Subsequent to washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), slides were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies followed by incubation with conjugated horseradish peroxidase-labeled streptavidin (Dako UK Ltd., Ely, UK) and washed with PBS. Slides were then incubated with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin. Subsequent to staining, five high-power fields (magnification, ×400) were randomly selected in each slide and the average proportion of positive cells in each field was counted using the true color multi-functional cell image analysis management system (Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA). To exclude any non-specific staining, PBS was used to replace the primary antibody as a negative control.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using the SPSS package for Windows (Version 11.5; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results and Discussion
TARAP inhibits tumor angiogenesis in a xenograft model
Deregulated angiogenesis has a crucial role in the development of various diseases, including cancer (6,22,23). CD31 is a characteristic molecule in vascular ECs which is used as an angiogenesis marker in vivo. In the present study, immunohistochemical staining of CD31 was used to identify the degree of angiogenesis. As shown in Fig. 1A and B, the microvessel density of the HCC xenografts in the TARAP-treated mice was observed to be reduced compared with that in the control mice, suggesting that TARAP inhibited angiogenesis in vivo. Thus, TARAP may mediate its antitumor activity through blocking angiogenesis.
TARAP inhibits the expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR2 in HCC xenograft mice
In the process of tumor growth, interaction between tumor cells and vascular ECs causes increases in tumor blood vessels and promotes tumor growth (24,25). VEGF-A is commonly expressed in a wide variety of types of human tumor cells, is one of the most effective biological inducers of angiogenesis and is associated with angiogenesis, growth and metastasis (26–29). To analyze the effect of TARAP on tumor angiogensis, VEGF-A and VEGFR2 expression were assessed in a xenograft model using PCR analysis and IHC. PCR analysis revealed that TARAP treatment reduced the mRNA expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR2 in the HCC xenografts (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, IHC showed that the protein expression of VEGF-A and VEGFR2 was similar to their respective mRNA expression levels. The percentage of VEGF-A- and VEGFR2-positive cells in the control group was found to be 84±12.34 and 86.67±11.48%, respectively, while that in TARAP-treated mice was 23.5±4.31 and 24.83±5.79%, respectively (Fig. 2B).
TARAP suppresses the Notch signaling pathway in HCC xenograft mice
Tumor angiogenesis is tightly regulated by the Notch signaling pathway; therefore, in the present study, the effect of TARAP on the expression of key mediators of the Notch signaling pathway was investigated using PCR and IHC analyses. As shown in Fig. 3A, TARAP treatment was observed to significantly reduce the mRNA expression of Notch, Dll4 and jagged 1 in tumor tissues. Furthermore, their protein expression was significantly inhibited by TARAP treatment. The percentages of Notch-, Dll4- and jagged 1-positive cells in the control group were 80±10.96, 50.17±9.68 and 61±8.42%, respectively, whereas those in TARAP-treated mice were 37.33±7.32, 23.17±3.99 and 19.5±3.1%, respectively (Fig. 3B). These findings suggested that the inhibitory effect of TARAP on tumor angiogenesis in vivo may be mediated through the suppression of the Notch signaling pathway.
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first study to show that TARAP inhibits tumor angiogenesis through the suppression of the Notch signaling pathway, which may in part explain its anticancer activity.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by grants from the Nature Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (nos. 2010J01191 and 2010J01194) and the Medical Originality Foundation of Fujian Province of China (no. 2009-CX-18).
References
Tsai WL and Chung RT: Viral hepatocarcinogenesis. Oncogene. 29:2309–2324. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schütte K, Bornschein J and Malfertheiner P: Hepatocellular carcinoma - epidemiological trends and risk factors. Dig Dis. 27:80–92. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bikfalvi A: Significance of angiogenesis in tumour progression and metastasis. Eur J Cancer. 31A:1101–1104. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Folkman J: What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst. 82:4–6. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ingber D, Fujita T, Kishimoto S, Sudo K, Kanamaru T, Brem H and Folkman J: Synthetic analogues of fumagillin that inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumour growth. Nature. 348:555–557. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Folkman J and Shing Y: Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 267:10931–10934. 1992. | |
Pluda JM: Tumor-associated angiogenesis: mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Semin Oncol. 24:203–218. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Folkman J: Anti-angiogenesis: new concept for therapy of solid tumors. Ann Surg. 175:409–416. 1972. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brem H and Folkman J: Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis mediated by cartilage. J Exp Med. 141:427–439. 1975. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Voest EE: Inhibitors of angiogenesis in a clinical perspective. Anticancer Drugs. 7:723–727. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jung YD, Ahmad SA, Liu W, Reinmuth N, Parikh A, Stoeltzing O, Fan F and Ellis LM: The role of the microenvironment and intercellular cross-talk in tumor angiogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 12:105–112. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krebs LT, Xue Y, Norton CR, et al: Notch signaling is essential for vascular morphogenesis in mice. Genes Dev. 14:1343–1352. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Krebs LT, Shutter JR, Tanigaki K, Honio T, Stark KL and Gridley T: Haploinsufficient lethality and formation of arteriovenous malformations in Notch pathway mutants. Genes Dev. 18:2469–2473. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xue Y, Gao X, Lindsell CE, et al: Embryonic lethality and vascular defects in mice lacking the Notch ligand Jagged1. Hum Mol Genet. 8:723–730. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD and Lake RJ: Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 284:770–776. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo S, Liu M and Gonzalez-Perez RR: Role of Notch and its oncogenic signaling crosstalk in breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1815:197–213. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Li JL and Harris AL: Notch signaling from tumor cells: a new mechanism of angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 8:1–3. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taylor KL, Henderson AM and Hughes CC: Notch activation during endothelial cell network formation in vitro targets the basic HLH transcription factor HESR-1 and downregulates VEGFR-2/KDR expression. Microvasc Res. 64:372–383. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Williams CK, Li JL, Murga M, Harris AL and Tosato G: Upregulation of the Notch ligand Delta-like 4 inhibits VEGF-induced endothelial cell function. Blood. 107:931–939. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zimrin AB, Pepper MS, McMahon GA, Nguyen F, Montesano R and Maciag T: An antisense oligonucleotide to the notch ligand jagged enhances fibroblast growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vitro. J Biol Chem. 271:32499–32502. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhao J, Chen X, Lin W, et al: Total alkaloids of Rubus aleaefolius Poir inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma growth in vivo and in vitro via activation of mitochondrial-dependent apoptosis. Int J Oncol. 42:971–978. 2013. | |
Folkman J: Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other diseases. Nat Med. 1:27–31. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Folkman J: Angiogenesis. Annu Rev Med. 57:1–18. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, et al: Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature. 407:242–248. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishiwata I, Sudo T, Kiguchi K and Ishikawa H: Tumor angiogenesis factors produced by cancer cells. Hum Cell. 12:37–46. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Risau W: Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 386:671–674. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jain RK: Tumor angiogenesis and accessibility: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. Semin Oncol. 29(6 Suppl 16): 3–9. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N: Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. Semin Oncol. 29(6 Suppl 16): 10–14. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Houck KA, Ferrara N, Winer J, et al: The vascular endothelial growth factor family: identification of a fourth molecular species and characterization of alternative splicing of RNA. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1806–1814. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |