Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by Endostar in rats

  • Authors:
    • Jian Liu
    • Panpan Ye
    • Zhaoan Su
    • Kana Lin
    • Fengying He
    • Wen Xu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 23, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.3132
  • Pages: 3621-3625
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is common in various retinal and choroidal diseases, and may result in severe and irreversible loss of vision. Our previous studies suggested that Endostar, a novel recombinant endostatin, is able to inhibit the proliferation and migration of choroid‑retinal endothelial cells. To further evaluate the effect of Endostar on the formation of CNV in vivo, a rat model of laser‑induced CNV was constructed and Endostar or phosphate‑buffered saline treatment was administered intravitreally every other day. Using fluorescein angiography (FA), reduced CNV incidence and leakage grade was observed in the Endostar group. In addition, CNV area and maximal thickness were prominently reduced in the Endostar group measured by choroid flat mounts and sections. Furthermore, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia‑inducible factor 1α and chemokine C‑X‑C motif ligand 1 were markedly reduced in the Endostar group as determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and downregulation of VEGF was also verified by western blot analysis at the protein level. This study demonstrates that Endostar suppressed CNV in a rat model, which may be largely mediated by the downregulation of VEGF and other angiogenic molecules.

Introduction

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) refers to the abnormal growth of choroidal vessels, which extend through Bruch’s membrane into the sub-retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) or subretinal space (1). Its formation is widely considered as the outcome of breaking the balance between angiogenic and angiostatic factors. Among these factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), one of numerous pro-angiogenic molecules, has been indicated as a critical factor in CNV growth in a number of experimental and clinical studies (24).

Endostar is a novel recombinant human endostatin, which was approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in 2005 (5). It has a six-histidine tag at the N-terminal of the protein, which may simplify purification and improve the stability of the protein (6). Previous studies have indicated that Endostar reduces micro blood vessel density and lymphatic micro vessel density to control tumor growth in vivo via the downregulation of VEGF-A and VEGF-C (7).

Considering the potential effect of endostatin on experimental CNV (8,9), Endostar was administered to laser-induced CNV in rats to determine whether this drug may prevent CNV formation. In addition, the potential underlying mechanisms were investigated.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male brown Norway rats (age, 8 weeks) obtained from the Animal Supply Center of Zhejiang Academy of Medical Science (Hangzhou, China) were used in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The present study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the School of Medicine, Zhenjiang University (Hangzhou, China). Anesthesia was induced by intraperitoneal injection of 1% sodium pentobarbital (45 mg/kg body weight), and then the ocular surface was anesthetized with topical instillation of oxybuprocaine hydrochloride. The pupils were dilated with topical 1% tropicamide (Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan).

Induction of CNV and administration of Endostar or vehicle

Eight burns of 532-nm diode laser photocoagulation (50 μm, 0.05 sec, 300 mW) were delivered to each retina with the slit lamp delivery system of a diode laser (OcuLight GL; Iridex, Mountain View, CA, USA) to induce the CNV model. The laser spots were applied between the major retinal vessels 2–4 disc diameters from the optical disc. Ocular contact lenses (Ocular Instruments Inc., Bellevue, WA, USA) filled with one drop of methylcellulose were applied to the rat cornea. Production of a bubble at the time of laser exposure was confirmed for each spot. A total of 40 rats received laser photocoagulation treatment in each eye and were then divided equally into two groups, the Endostar group and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) control group, at random. Each rat received an intravitreal injection of 10 μl Endostar (5 mg/ml; Yantai Sincere Machinery Co., Ltd., Yantai, China) or 10 μl PBS bilaterally using a sterile 10 μl Hamilton syringe (Hamilton Co., Reno, NV, USA) with a 33G needle following laser photocoagulation every other day for two weeks. This surgery was completed under visualization of Zeiss OPMI 6SFR operating microscope (Zeiss Humphrey Systems, Dublin, CA, USA). All examinations of the rats were performed 14 days following the photocoagulation.

Fluorescein angiogram (FA)

The activity of CNV was evaluated by assessment of late-phase FA, captured 8–10 min following intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 ml of 10% fluorescein sodium (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX, USA) at day 14 in the rat models. The anesthetized rats with dilated pupils were observed using a digital imaging system (Heidelberg Retina Angiograph II; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Leakage was defined as the presence of a hyperfluorescent spot that increased in size with time. Angiograms were graded by a previously established scheme (10) as follows: 0, no leakage; 1, slight leakage (hyperfluorescent lesion without progressive increase in size or intensity); 2, moderate leakage (hyperfluorescence increasing in intensity but not in size); 3, prominent leakage (hyperfluorescence increasing in intensity and in size). In order to ensure the effectiveness and accuracy of the evaluation, the angiograms were assessed by two independent graders, who were blinded to the intervention.

Choroidal flat mounts

CNV area was measured with choroidal flat mounts in accordance with the previously reported methods (11). The rats were anesthetized and perfused through the left ventricle with 50 ml vehicle, followed by 20 ml of 5 mg/ml FITC-dextran (MW, 2×106; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 10% (wt/vol) gelatin. The eyes were enucleated and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h. Next, the anterior segment and retina were removed from the eyecup. Four to six relaxing radial incisions were made, and the remaining RPE-choroid-sclera complex was coverslipped. Images of the choroidal flat mounts were then captured under an epifluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For measuring the CNV lesion, the green hyperfluorescent area at the laser spot in the flat mounts was measured by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Immunofluorescent staining

Enucleated eyes from rats were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 12 h. After the anterior segment and lens were removed, the remaining eyecup was cytoprotected with 30% sucrose and then embedded in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetech, Tokyo, Japan). The eyecups were cut into 7-μm sections. Following blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h, these cryo-sections were incubated with the primary rabbit anti-CD31 monoclonal antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at 4°C overnight. The sections were then incubated with secondary antibody, FITC-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG F(ab)2 fragment (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 1 h. The slides were viewed with an epifluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems). CNV thickness was then measured vertically from the adjacent RPE layer to the top of the CNV. Consecutive sections were examined to select maximal CNV thickness. The thickness was measured by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics).

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from six rat eyecups in each group using TRIzol reagent and the cDNA was generated using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis system (both from Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). qPCR was performed using an ABI Prism 7500™ instrument (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the SYBR Premix Dimer Eraser (Takara Bio, Inc., Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The mRNA expression of VEGF, hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 1 (CXCL1), angiogenin (Ang), fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (Flt-1) and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) were analyzed after normalization against the expression of GAPDH. Primer sequences were as follows: Forward: 5′-AGGCAGCTTGAGTTAAACGAACGTA-3′ and reverse: 5′-AGGTCTAGTTCCCGACCCTGA-3′ for VEGF; forward: 5′-TCTAGTGAACAGGATGGAATGGAG-3′ and reverse: 5′-TCGTAACTGGGCTGTGGTAA-3′ for HIF-1α; forward: 5′-TGCACCCAAACCGTC-3′ and reverse: 5′-ACGCCA TCGGTGCAATCTA-3′ for CXCL1; forward: 5′-CCAGTT GCAAGCATA-3′ and reverse: 5′-AGCCATTCTCACA GGCAATAACAAC-3′ for Ang; forward: 5′-GAGTGCAAA TGGATGAAG-3′ and reverse: 5′-CAGCAATCCATG ATTTGGTA-3′ for Flt-1; forward: 5′-GAGTGCCTC CAGAATTGTGTTTGA-3′ and reverse: 5′-CCTGCACCCAGT TGTTAATCTCC-3′ for PEDF; and forward: 5-CAAGTTCAA CACAGTCA-3′ and reverse: 5′-CCATTTGATGTTAG CGGGAT-3′ for GAPDH. The PCR conditions for various genes were as follows: 40 cycles of 95°C for 2 min; 95°C for 5 sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 34 sec.

Western blot analysis

The protein extracts were prepared from three eyecups in each group. The samples were then assessed for protein concentration (Bradford assay; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). Electrophoresis of proteins was performed with 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. A total of 30 μg of protein were loaded on each lane. The protein was electrotransferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), which was blocked in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST) containing 5% (wt/vol) BSA for 1 h at room temperature and then probed overnight at 4°C with rabbit polyclonal anti-VEGF (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) or rabbit polyclonal anti-β-actin antibody (1:2,000; Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO, USA). The blots were washed three times with TBST for 15 min per wash and then incubated with anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG secondary antibody (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. They were then washed again three times each for 5 min. Chemiluminescent detection was accomplished using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, Little Chalfont, UK) and ChemiDoc XRS apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The band intensity was measured using densitometry. The results were expressed as the density ratio relative to β-actin.

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Student’s t-test was used for statistical comparison of the means between the groups. The changes of leakage of CNV were analyzed using Pearson’s χ2 test or Mann-Whitney U test, where appropriate. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All P-values are two-sided, and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Endostar suppresses the activity and volume of CNV

The FA in the two groups was compared at day 14 following treatment. The outcome revealed that Endostar-treated rats had reduced CNV incidence and leakage grade compared with the control. CNV was observed in 50.3% laser spots in Endostar-treated rats (n=161 spots), while it was observed in a significantly higher proportion in control rats (75.8%, n=153 spots; P<0.05, by Pearson’s χ2 test). The extent of CNV leakage also reduced markedly in Endostar-treated rats (P<0.001, by Mann-Whitney U test; Fig. 1).

CNV area and the maximal thickness of each CNV were quantified by analysis of fluorescence on day 14 following Endostar or PBS treatment. The mean CNV area in Endostar-treated rats (n=39 spots) was significantly less than that in PBS-treated rats (n=42 spots; 51711±2880 vs. 67019±5407 pixel, P<0.05, by Student’s t-test; Fig. 2). Furthermore, the maximal thickness of CNV in the Endostar group was also reduced significantly compared with the PBS group (73.5±5.6 μm vs. 94.8±6.4 μm, respectively; n=11 spots per group, P<0.05, by Student’s t-test; Fig. 3).

Endostar downregulates angiogenesis-associated molecules

To determine the effect of Endostar on angiogenesis-associated molecules, eyecups of rat models at day 14 were collected, and qPCR was performed to detect the expression changes of certain molecules between the two groups and the results demonstrated that at the mRNA level, VEGF, HIF-1α and CXCL1 were significantly downregulated in the Endostar group (n=6 per group; P<0.05, by Student’s t-test). However, no significant changes were observed in the expression of Ang, Flt-1 and PEDF (Fig. 4). Furthermore, as verified by western blot analysis, Endostar significantly suppressed the expression of VEGF at the protein level compared with the PBS group (n=3 per group; P<0.05, by Student’s t-test), although the two groups demonstrated upregulated expression of VEGF compared with the control group without laser photocoagulation (Fig. 5).

Discussion

Endostatin is a broad-spectrum endogenous angiostatic protein, which is proposed to inhibit E-cadherins, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), the VEGF signaling pathway, cell survival-related genes, STATs and other key molecules in angiogenesis (1215). Compared with endostatin, Endostar has an improved function and longer half-life (16). The anti-vescularization properties of Endostar are widely conisdered to be correlated with VEGF (7,17).

In the present study, the angiostatic effects of Endostar were investigated in a laser-induced CNV model. As exhibited by FA, Endostar-treated rats had a significantly reduced incidence of CNV and grade of fluorescence leakage than the PBS group at day 14. To compare the volume of CNV, the choroidal flat mounts and the maximal CNV thickness were detected separately. The results indicated that Endostar treatment significantly decreased the volume of CNV. qPCR and western blot analysis of eyecups in each group confirmed the hypothesis that Endostar exerts its angiostatic effect by regulating the transcription and expression of VEGF, the vital molecule in angiogenesis. In addition, Endostar may also affect other important factors in the angiogenic network. A previous study suggested that RPE cell-derived HIF-1α is a pivotal contributor to CNV (18). The present results demonstrated an evident decrease in the HIF-1α mRNA in the Endostar group, which may contribute to CNV suppression. Neutrophil invasion was characteristic of early inflammatory responses during laser-induced CNV, which promoted the early development of CNV possibly via the secretion of angiogenic growth factors (19). CXCR2 is considered to have a crucial role in neutrophil infiltration, while its ligand CXCL1 has potent angiogenic activity (20). Therefore, the downregulation of CXCL1 in the Endostar group may also be conducive to the suppression of CNV.

The present study does however have a number of limitations. Although this CNV model shares histological and angiographic features with the human disease, this acute wound-healing model cannot absolutely reflect the chronic disease found clinically. However, it remains useful to understand the process of CNV development and investigate novel therapeutic agents and strategies. Another limitation of the present study is the absence of further exploration of the appropriate dosage of Endostar for intravitreal injection. Although based on the experience from other experiments, it was possible to observe CNV suppression in the present rat model, further studies are required to examine the efficiency and safety of Endostar and to determine the optimal dosage for future application.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that Endostar is able to suppress newly-formed CNV by reducing the expression of VEGF and other angiogenic factors. Therefore, it has potential for clinical CNV treatment alone or as an adjuvant therapy.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Youth Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 11104246/A040414), the Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (grant no. Y2100380), the Zhejiang Science and Technology Department Public Project (grant no. 2010C33085), the Zhejiang Key Innovation Team Project (grant no. 2009R50039), the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (grant no. 20100101120135) and the Key Lab Fund of Zhejiang Province (grant no. 2011E10006).

References

1 

Grossniklaus HE and Green WR: Choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol. 137:496–503. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Yu MJ, Shen WY, Lai MC, Constable IJ, Papadimitriou JM and Rakoczy PE: The role of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in abnormal vascular changes in the adult rat eye. Growth Factors. 17:301–312. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Kwak N, Okamoto N, Wood JM and Campochiaro PA: VEGF is major stimulator in model of choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41:3158–3164. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

4 

Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, et al: Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 355:1419–1431. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Ling Y, Yang Y, Lu N, et al: Endostar, a novel recombinant human endostatin, exerts antiangiogenic effect via blocking VEGF -induced tyrosine phosphorylation of KDR/Flk-1 of endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 361:79–84. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Song HF, Liu XW, Zhang HN, et al: Pharmacokinetics of His-tag recombinant human endostatin in Rhesus monkeys. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 26:124–128. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Ma X, Yao Y, Yuan D, et al: Recombinant human endostatin endostar suppresses angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis of malignant pleural effusion in mice. PLoS One. 7:e534492012. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Marneros AG, She H, Zambarakji H, et al: Endogenous endostatin inhibits choroidal neovascularization. FASEB J. 21:3809–3818. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Mori K, Ando A, Gehlbach P, et al: Inhibition of choroidal neovascularization by intravenous injection of adenoviral vectors expressing secretable endostatin. Am J Pathol. 159:313–320. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Kim C, Yu HG and Sohn J: The anti-angiogenic effect of chlorogenic acid on choroidal neovascularization. Korean J Ophthalmol. 24:163–168. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Honda M, Asai T, Umemoto T, Araki Y, Oku N and Tanaka M: Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by intravitreal injection of liposomal SU5416. Arch Ophthalmol. 129:317–321. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Sudhakar A, Sugimoto H, Yang C, Lively J, Zeisberg M and Kalluri R: Human tumstatin and human endostatin exhibit distinct antiangiogenic activities mediated by alpha v beta 3 and alpha 5 beta 1 integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:4766–4771. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Nyberg P, Heikkilä P, Sorsa T, et al: Endostatin inhibits human tongue carcinoma cell invasion and intravasation and blocks the activation of matrix metalloprotease-2, -9, and -13. J Biol Chem. 278:22404–22411. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Rehn M, Veikkola T, Kukk-Valdre E, et al: Interaction of endostatin with integrins implicated in angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:1024–1029. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Abdollahi A, Hahnfeldt P, Maercker C, et al: Endostatin’s antiangiogenic signaling network. Mol Cell. 13:649–663. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Jia H and Kling J: China offers alternative gateway for experimental drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 24:117–118. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Zhao ZZ, Cao Y, Liu ZS, et al: Effects of recombinant human endostatin on peritoneal angiogenesis in peritoneal dialysis rats. Nephrology (Carlton). 16:599–606. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Lin M, Hu Y, Chen Y, et al: Impacts of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 knockout in the retinal pigment epithelium on choroidal neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 53:6197–6206. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhou J, Pham L, Zhang N, et al: Neutrophils promote experimental choroidal neovascularization. Mol Vis. 11:414–424. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Strieter RM, Polverini PJ, Kunkel SL, et al: The functional role of the ELR motif in CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 270:27348–27357. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2015
Volume 11 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Liu J, Ye P, Su Z, Lin K, He F and Xu W: Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by Endostar in rats. Mol Med Rep 11: 3621-3625, 2015.
APA
Liu, J., Ye, P., Su, Z., Lin, K., He, F., & Xu, W. (2015). Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by Endostar in rats. Molecular Medicine Reports, 11, 3621-3625. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.3132
MLA
Liu, J., Ye, P., Su, Z., Lin, K., He, F., Xu, W."Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by Endostar in rats". Molecular Medicine Reports 11.5 (2015): 3621-3625.
Chicago
Liu, J., Ye, P., Su, Z., Lin, K., He, F., Xu, W."Suppression of choroidal neovascularization by Endostar in rats". Molecular Medicine Reports 11, no. 5 (2015): 3621-3625. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2014.3132