Recombinant human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 effectively inhibits angiogenesis in vivo
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 20, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3229
- Pages: 3432-3438
Abstract
Introduction
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), also known as vascular permeability factor, is an endothelial cell-specific mitogen and an angiogenic inducer (1). The activation of VEGF induces mitogenic permeability of the vascular endothelium; thus, VEGF has an important role in various physiological and pathological modulations, including cyclical blood vessel proliferation, longitudinal bone growth, endochondral bone formation, wound healing, cardiovascular diseases, ocular disorders, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis (2–4). Specifically, VEGF is a critical factor in tumor angiogenesis; VEGF is highly expressed in various tumorous tissues, and the activation of VEGF often promotes tumor growth (5). The VEGF family of proteins in mammals is encoded by five different genes: VEGFA, VEGFB, VEGFC, FIGF, and placenta growth factors (PGF-1 and PGF-2) (6). VEGFA has the most profound effects on stimulating endothelial cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. Alternative splicing of the VEGFA gene yields five different isoforms: VEGFA-120, VEGFA-144, VEGFA-164, VEGFA-188, and VEGFA-205; each differing in biological activity, however they are primarily associated with angiogenesis (7–10). The VEGFA isoform regulates cell proliferation through two membrane-bound receptor tyrosine kinases, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, which bind VEFGA with high affinity.
VEGF binds two related receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), VEGF receptor-1 (VEGFR-1) and VEGFR-2. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 have similar extracellular and transmembrane domains containing a tyrosine kinase sequence (11,12). A spliced, soluble form of VEGFR-1 (soluble Flt-1), once activated, leads to the inhibition of downstream pathways of VEGF. Since the binding site for VEGF (and placental growth factor) is primarily located in the immunoglobulin-like domain (13), it has been proposed that VEGFR-1 may not be a primary receptor, but a decoy receptor to prevent VEGF from binding to VEGFR-2 (14).
In the present study, a recombinant VEGFR-1 was constructed for expression in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this study was to examine the exact role of VEGFR-1 in regulating VEGF-induced angiogenesis.
Materials and methods
Generation of recombinant human VEGFR1 domains (D)1-3/Fc (rhVEGFR-1)
cDNA (National Center for Biotechnology Information reference NM_002019.3) encoding the human VEGFR-1D1-3 was cloned using chemical synthesis and overlap extension polymerase chain reaction. The primers used were as follows: Forward, 5′-GGAATTCCGATATCA CCATGGTCAGCTACTGGGAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-CGG GATCCCGACTTACCTGTTTTATCATATATATGCACTGA G-3′. The cDNA sequences were fused with a human immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1Fc fragment with an intron included (provided by Dr H.Z. Liu, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences) and inserted into a cloning vector pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), resulting in pcDNA3.1-rhVEGFR-1.
Expression of rhVEGFR-1
Cell transfection
The Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cells were maintained at 37°C and under 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM)/F12 (1:1) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone). The cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-rhVEGFR-1 plasmid with Lipofectamine™ 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The stable, higher-expression recombinant CHO (rCHO) cells were identified using ELISA (Fangcheng Biotechnology Company, Beijing, China).
rCHO cell culture and purification of rhVEGFR-1
The selected rCHO cell line was cultured in roller bottles with DMEM/F12 (1:1) supplemented with 2% newborn calf serum until the cells were ~90% confluent. The DMEM/F12 (1:1) was replaced every two days. rhVEGFR-1 was purified from the cell culture supernatant using rProtein A Sepharose™ Fast Flow (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) affinity chromatography. The supernatant was adjusted to pH 6.8 in 20 mM Na2HPO4 and applied to protein A column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) by ÄKTAprime plus (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), and rhVEGFR-1 protein was eluted using 0.5 M arginine, pH 3.5 (15,16). The eluted protein was neutralized immediately using 1/10 volume of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 9.0.
Western blot analysis and protein identification
Western blot analysis
The protein samples were separated using 10 and 6% SDS-PAGE under reducing or non-reducing conditions and stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250, prior to being transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) by electroblotting. The rhVEGFR-1 (1:50,000) was used as the primary antibody and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG antibody (1:20,000) was used as a secondary antibody (BGI-GBI Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. The Immobilon™ Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (Millipore) was used to visualize the bound antibody and the final data were recorded using X-Omat BT Film (Kodak, Atlanta, GA, USA).
Protein identification using nanoscale liquid chromatography coupled with tandem high-definition mass spectrometry (nanoLC-HDMS MS/MS)
The amino acid sequence of purified rhVEGFR-1 was analyzed using nanoLC-HDMS MS/MS on a nanoACQUITY™ Ultra Performance LC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) and a Synapt HDMS system, with nanospray ion source (Waters Corp.) in the National Center of Biomedical Analysis (Beijing, China).
ELISA
Prior to measuring the association and dissociation constants for the binding of rhVEGFR-1 to VEGF, the affinity was first confirmed using ELISA. A 96-well plate was coated with VEGF-165 and proteins were added to each line with a 1/2-concentration decrement. The maximum molar ratio of each protein was ~1/6 to the coated VEGF. The plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h and then the HRP-conjugated goat-anti-human IgG was added (1:5,000), followed by 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethyl benzidine dihydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The plate was then further incubated at 37°C. The optical density was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis
All procedures were performed using the Biacore 3000 system (Biacore AB, Uppsala, Sweden) in running buffer (10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl and 0.005% Tween-80, pH 7.5) at 25°C. The VEGF-165 (PeproTech, London, UK) was covalently linked to the carboxylated dextran matrix of the sensor chip CM5 (Biacore AB). Kinetic experiments were performed by injecting a series of concentrations of rhVEGFR-1 (200, 100, 50, 25 and 12.5 nM, diluted in running buffer, with or without 10 mM MgCl2) into the sensor chip CM5. Baselines were regenerated with a 20-μl first injection pulse of 10 mM glycine (pH 1.5) and a second injection pulse of Borate 8.5 (10 mM disodium tetraborate and 1 M NaCl, pH 8.5; Biacore AB), resulting in <1% loss of baseline per injection. Dissociation and association rate constants (kd and ka, respectively) were obtained using BIAevaluation 4.0 software (Biacore AB), and the equilibrium dissociation constant, KD, values were calculated by ka/kd.
Proliferation assay
The proliferation metrics of the human microvascular endothelial cell line HMEC-1, provided by Professor Ding Jian (Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China), were determined by suspending the cells at 2×105 cells/ml in ice-cold endothelial cell medium (ECM; ScienCell Research Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing all the necessary growth factors and serum supplements. Approximately 50 μl cell suspension was seeded into each well of a 96-well tissue culture plate. Upon attachment to bottom of the plate, the ECM was replaced with rhVEGFR-1, ranging between 0 and 800 ng/ml, and rhVEGF-165 (28 ng/ml preincubation) with continuous incubation at 37°C under 5% CO2 for five days. Approximately 50 μl 5 μg/ml Calcein AM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) was then added to each well, and the plate was incubated for an additional 30–60 min under the same conditions. The fluorescence intensities at excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/530 nm were analyzed using a fluorescence plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).
Migration assay
HMEC-1 were suspended in ECM at a density of 4×105 cells/ml. A total of 0.25 ml suspension was placed into a Millicell chamber (Millipore), while 600 μl culture medium, containing between 0 and 800 ng/ml rhVEGFR-1 and rhVEGF-165 (28 ng/ml preincubation), was added into the bottom well and incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 12 h. Following incubation, the cells were removed from the top chamber. The insert plate was transferred to another 24-well plate containing 0.5 ml/well Calcein AM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) that was prepared in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution at a concentration of 5 μg/ml, and further incubated at 37°C under 5% CO2 for an additional 30–60 min. Migrated HMEC-1 were detected and quantified using a fluorescence plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/530 nm.
Chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay
Fertilized eggs from White Leghorn chickens (Laboratory Animal Center, Beijing, China) were washed with Benzalkonium Bromide (1:1,000) and incubated blunt-end-up in a standard egg incubator at 37.8±0.5°C and 60–80% relative humidity. After seven days of development, the eggs to be windowed were dried using 75% ethanol. An electric engraving tool was used to make a circular window measuring 15–20 mm in diameter in the air sac. The round shell caps were aseptically removed and the shell membranes were washed with warm, sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The caps were then completely detached from the shell and the CAM was removed using fine tweezers. Sterile 6-mm-diameter blank concentration disks were first soaked with rhVEGFR-1 (ranging between 0 and 25 pM in 5 μl PBS) and then aseptically transplanted onto the CAMs. Bovine serum albumin (100 ng) was used as the negative control. Shell windows were then covered with hyalo adhesive tape, and the eggs were further incubated at 37.8±0.5°C and 60–80 % relative humidity. Four days after transplantation, the eggs were fixed in methanol. The CAMs were excised around the disks and images were captured (17).
Directed in vivo angiogenesis assay (DIVAA)
The nude mice were subcutaneously implanted with semi-closed silicone cylinders (angioreactors). The angioreactors (DIVAA Inhibition Assay, catalog no. 3450-048-IK) were purchased from Trevigen Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Angioreactors were filled with 18 μl extracellular matrix premixed with angiogenic or anti-angiogenic factors. The vascularization within the angioreactors was quantified using an intravenous injection of fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran prior to the recovery of the angioreactor, followed by spectrofluorimetry. The use of immunofluorescence to examine the angioreactors showed the invading angiogenic vessels at different developmental stages. The minimally detectable angiogenic response occurs nine days subsequent to implantation and with the addition of >50 ng/ml (P<0.01) of either fibroblast growth factor-2 or VEGF. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 13.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data are shown as the means ± standard error of the mean, and were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance. A P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Cloning of rhVEGFR-1
For the cDNA of VEGFR-1, the products on the agarose gels were observed to be ~1,030-bp long, which was as expected (Fig. 1). The synthesized sequence was then fused with human IgG1Fc (intron included) fragment and cloned into the expression plasmid, resulting in pcDNA3.1-rhVEGFR1 (Fig. 2). Following a 12-day selective culture, the transfected cells formed clones. After a further 12 days, the clones were screened for rhVEGFR-1 using ELISA and confirmed using western blot analysis and peptide sequencing (Fig 3). The evaluation of the inhibitory effect of rhVEGFR-1 was performed by mixing the receptor at concentrations ranging between 0 and 800 ng/ml with 28 ng/ml rhVEGF-165 (Table I and Figs. 4 and 5).
rhVEGFR-1 inhibits VEGF-induced HMEC-1 migration
An in vitro assay was performed using HMEC-1 on an angiogenesis cell migration plate. The cells were placed in the top chamber, and the medium containing rhVEGF-165 (28 ng/ml) premixed with rhVEGFR-1 (0–800 ng/ml) was added in the bottom chamber. Following incubation for 12 h, rhVEGFR-1 was observed to inhibit the cell migration with a linear correlation at concentrations of 0–200 ng/ml, and the VEGFR-1 binding sites were saturated at the range 200–800 ng/ml (Fig. 6).
rhVEGFR-1 inhibits CAM angiogenesis
In order to determine the effect of rhVEGFR-1 on angiogenesis, the area of the avascular zone in chicken embryos was analyzed. It was found that it increased in size following the application of rhVEGFR-1 in a dose-dependent manner, confirming the inhibitory effect of rhVEGFR-1 on CAM angiogenesis (P<0.01; Fig. 7).
rhVEGFR-1 inhibits VEGF-induced angiogenesis in vivo
In an in vivo experiment, angiogenesis was analyzed in nude mice. It was found that rhVEGFR-1 inhibited VEGF-induced angiogenesis in a dose-dependent manner. The application of 160 μg/ml rhVEGFR-1 was shown to almost completely block angiogenesis in nude mice (Fig. 8).
Discussion
The VEGF pathway is important in the regulation of embryonic vascular development and tumor angiogenesis. Blockade of the VEGF pathway effectively inhibits tumor angiogenesis and growth in preclinical models. Thus, targeting VEGF may lead to novel therapies for clinical application. Data has also suggested that the potential functional roles of VEGF are associated with its receptors, VEGF1 and VEGF2. The results of the present study suggest that VEGF-121, VEGF-165, VEGF-C and VEGFR-2 may all be involved in regulating carcinoma cell survival, proliferation (via the autocrine signaling mechanism) and migration (via the paracrine signaling mechanism).
The cation Mg2+ is an important supplement in ECM. Notably, it was observed that rhVEGFR-1 bound to VEGF-165 with high affinity without the obvious influence of Mg2+, and the KD value of rhVEGFR-1 binding to VEGF-165 was different to that found in previous studies (13,18,19). This may be explained by the fact that the ELISA, Scatchard analysis and 125I-VEGF-165 competition analysis employed in previous studies all had multiple steps and may have had poor reproducibility. In the present study, the SPR analysis run on Biacore had just one step and relatively high reproducibility, suggesting that the data from the present study are more reliable.
The dose-effect analysis revealed that rhVEGFR-1 could not block VEGF-165 activity with concentrations <200 ng/ml. The results suggested a molar ratio of 2:1 of rhVEGFR-1 to homodimeric VEGF-165 to be necessary to reach a minimum inhibition. A ratio of 8:1 appeared to be sufficient for maximum inhibition.
In the in vivo experiment, the DIVAA developed by Guedez et al (20) was found to be extremely sensitive. Without any assistance, newly formed vessels were observed in the angioreactors 12 days subsequent to transplantation.
In conclusion, in the present study an hVEGFR1D1-3/Fc fusion protein was constructed to obtain stable expression in an rCHO cell line. NanoLC-HDMS MS/MS was used to confirm the purity of the proteins. The affinity constant for the binding of rhVEGFR-1 to VEGF-165 was determined using SPR for the first time and was found to be accurate. The rhVEGFR-1 showed anti-angiogenic activity in cultured cells, in chicken embryos and in nude mice. The present study demonstrated the important role of VEGFR-1 in regulating VEGF-induced angiogenesis.
References
Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV and Ferrara N: Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 246:1306–1309. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N, Gerber HP and LeCouter J: The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 9:669–676. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Breen EC: VEGF in biological control. J Cell Biochem. 102:1358–1367. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carmeliet P: Angiogenesis in health and disease. Nat Med. 9:653–660. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Carmeliet P: VEGF as a key mediator of angiogenesis in cancer. Oncology. 69(Suppl 3): 4–10. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Clauss M: Molecular biology of the VEGF and the VEGF receptor family. Semin Thromb Hemost. 26:561–569. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Claesson-Welsh L and Welsh M: VEGFA and tumour angiogenesis. J Intern Med. 273:114–127. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Geng L, Chaudhuri A, Talmon G, Wisecarver JL and Wang J: TGF-Beta suppresses VEGFA-mediated angiogenesis in colon cancer metastasis. PLoS One. 8:e599182013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shen K, Ji L, Lu B and Wang Z: c-Jun N-terminal kinase mediated VEGFR2 sustained phosphorylation is critical for VEGFA-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Cell Biochem Biophys. 64:17–27. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weijts BG, Bakker WJ, Cornelissen PW, Liang KH, et al: E2F7 and E2F8 promote angiogenesis through transcriptional activation of VEGFA in cooperation with HIF1. EMBO J. 31:3871–3884. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shibuya M, Yamaguchi S, Yamane A, Ikeda T, Tojo A, Matsushime H and Sato M: Nucleotide sequence and expression of a novel human receptor-type tyrosine kinase gene (flt) closely related to the fms family. Oncogene. 5:519–524. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Terman BI, Carrion ME, Kovacs E, Rasmussen BA, Eddy RL and Shows TB: Identification of a new endothelial cell growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Oncogene. 6:1677–1683. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wiesmann C, Fuh G, Christinger HW, et al: Crystal structure at 1.7 A resolution of VEGF in complex with domain 2 of the Flt-1 receptor. Cell. 91:695–704. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JE, Chen HH, Winer J, Houck KA and Ferrara N: Placenta growth factor. Potentiation of vascular endothelial growth factor bioactivity, in vitro and in vivo, and high affinity binding to Flt-1 but not to Flk-1/KDR. J Biol Chem. 269:25646–25654. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ejima D, Yumioka R, Tsumoto K and Arakawa T: Effective elution of antibodies by arginine and arginine derivatives in affnity column chromatography. Anal Biochem. 345:250–257. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arakawa T, Philo JS, Tsumoto K, et al: Elution of antibodies from a Protein-A column by aqueous arginine solutions. Protein Expr Purif. 36:244–248. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi ML, Duan HF, Xu ZP, Hu XW and Chen HP: Optimization of applying chick chorioallantoic membrane to angiogenesis assay. Letters in Biotech. 19:566–568. 2008.(In Chinese). | |
Herley MT, Yu Y, Whitney RG and Sato JD: Characterization of the VEGF binding site on the Flt-1 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 262:731–738. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Holash J, Davis S, Papadopoulos N, et al: VEGF-Trap: a VEGF blocker with potent antitumor effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:11393–11398. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guedez L, Rivera AM, Salloum R, et al: Quantitative assessment of angiogenic response by the directed in vivo angiogenesis assay. Am J Pathol. 162:1431–1439. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |