Effects of A2BR on the biological behavior of mouse renal fibroblasts during hypoxia
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 9, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3320
- Pages: 4397-4402
Abstract
Introduction
Renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) is considered to be the outcome of all types of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the common pathway that leads to end-stage renal failure (1). It has been demonstrated that in the process of RIF, renal fibroblasts, the effector cells for collagen secretion, underwent excessive proliferation and phenotypic transformation into myofibroblasts (2,3), resulting in abnormal proliferation of fibroblasts and accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) (4–6).
It is widely accepted that the loss of peritubular capillaries leads to local hypoxic ischemia during RIF. Adenosine (ADO) is a key factor in hypoxic ischemia-induced signal transduction via binding to the ADO receptor (AR) on the cell surface (7,8). A previous study in the mouse unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) model demonstrated that in addition to occlusion, the kidney exhibited hypoxic aggravation, ADO elevation and interstitial collagen accumulation, finally resulting in RIF (9). It was hypothesized that the binding of ADO with AR under hypoxia triggered a series of pathological alterations in fibroblasts, further inducing the progression of RIF. In the present study, an in vitro mouse fibroblast model was used to investigate the effects and related mechanism of the ADO signaling pathway in RIF development.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Cells from the mouse renal fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 (third/fourth passage) (Promab Biotechnologies, Inc., Changsha, China) were divided into the following four groups: i) Control; ii) 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine, NECA (cat. no. 1691, Tocris Bioscience, Minneapolis, MN, USA); iii) PT, NECA + 8-phenyltheophylline (PT) (cat. no. 2795, Tocris Bioscience); and iv) MRS, NECA + N-(4-cyanopheny l)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy]-acetamide (MRS1754) (cat. no. 2752, Tocris Bioscience). NECA was used as an analogue of ADO with in vitro instability. The cells were detected following incubation for 12, 24, 48 and 72 h. The drug concentrations were as follows: NECA, analogue of ADO, 20 μM; 8-PT, AR blocker, 20 μM, and MRS1754, A2BR antagonist, 20 μM.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR primers were designed by Premier, version 3.0 software (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized by ProMab Biotechnologies, Inc. The primer sequences are listed in Table I.
Fibroblast total RNA was isolated by the single-step method using TRIzol (15596-026; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RiboLock™ Ribonuclease Inhibitor (EO0381; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) was used to remove genomic DNA. The reverse transcription reaction was performed using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (K1631; Thermo Fisher Scientific). SYBR® Green master mix (4309155; Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for the RT-qPCR assay of target genes.
Fibroblast cell surface AR types were identified under hypoxia (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2) by TaqMan probe-based analysis using JumpStart Taq Ready Mix kit (P2893; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Primer and probe sequences of A1R, A2AR, A2BR, A3R and β-actin mRNA are shown in Table II (10–12).
The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 40 cycles of 94°C (20 sec), 58°C (20 sec) and 72°C (30 sec), using an ABI Prism® 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies). PCR quantification was conducted as previously described (13).
Cell proliferation assay
The 3-(4,5-dimethylthi-azol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (MTT Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Detection kit; Keygen Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was performed to determine the cell growth curve. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with 1×104 cells/well and were subjected to hypoxia (1% O2, 5% CO2 and 94% N2) for 24 h. Following incubation with the drugs described above, MTT and dimethyl sulfoxide were added sequentially and the optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm (DNM-9606 Enzyme Mark Analyzer; Perlong Medical, Beijing, China).
Cell-survival rate calculation: Cell-survival rate (%) = (ODsample − ODblank)/(ODcontrol − ODblank) × 100. ODblank refers to the value of culture medium mixed with MTT without cells. In addition, the cells were visualized microscopically (GX51; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), and all data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean. To analyze the differences between groups, Student’s t-test for two groups, analysis of variance for multiple group comparisons, and Tukey’s test for repeated measures were conducted. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
AR expression under hypoxia
The TaqMan probe-based assay demonstrated that the predominantly expressed AR on mouse renal fibroblasts under conditions of hypoxia was the A2BR subtype (Fig. 1).
Expression of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), procollagen α1 (I) and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)
TGF-β1 mRNA expression
Fig. 2A demonstrates that a significant increase in the levels of TGF-β1 mRNA was observed in fibroblasts under hypoxia in the NECA group (P<0.01). However, the PT and MRS groups were identified to have significantly lower expression levels than the NECA group (P<0.05) at days 2 and 3. No significant differences were observed between the PT and MRS treatment groups (P>0.05).
Procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression
Fig. 2B demonstrates that NECA significantly increased the levels of procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression (P<0.01). Compared with NECA, procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression was significantly reduced following PT or MRS treatment on days 2 and 3 (P<0.05). PT and MRS however, were not identified to significantly influence procollagen α1 (I) mRNA expression levels (P>0.05), and no differences were observed between the PT and MRS groups (P>0.05).
α-SMA mRNA expression
As presented in Fig. 2C, the stimulation of NECA significantly induced the expression of α-SMA (P<0.01). Compared with the control group, there was no effect of PT or MRS on α-SMA mRNA expression levels (P>0.05), which were significantly lower than in the NECA group (P<0.05). No significant differences were identified between the PT and MRS treatment groups (P>0.05). Proliferation of fibroblasts. Proliferation of renal fibroblasts was measured following 0, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h of hypoxia in triplicate (Fig. 3).
The cell survival rates of each group are presented in Fig. 4. Compared with the control group, NECA significantly induced renal fibroblast proliferation at 48 and 72 h (P<0.001). The addition of 8-PT or MRS 1754 was able to reverse the NECA-induced increase in renal fibroblast proliferation at 24, 48 and 72 h (P<0.01).
Discussion
Fibroblast proliferation and activation are closely associated with RIF development. Fibroblasts embedded within the renal interstitium synthesize various components of the ECM, including type I collagen, type III collagen and fibronectin (14). The majority of fibroblasts exist in a quiescent state and a small proportion remain active in order to repair damaged tissues (15). However, in pathological conditions, including hypoxic ischemia, inflammation and tissue damage, the excretion of cytokines and ECM results in excessive fibroblast proliferation and transdifferentiation to activated myofibroblasts. As a result of the enhanced collagen production by myofibroblasts, the ECM accumulation hinders normal renal function and results in the development of RIF. In this pathological process, fibroblast proliferation and activation are key to the development of RIF.
ADO is a chemical that is naturally present in all cells and an increase in the cytoplasmic ADO concentration under hypoxic ischemia is considered as a response to stress (16–18). There are two key sources of cellular ADO: The degradation of ADO triphosphate, and the dephosphorylation of adenosine monophosphate, which is produced by the extracellular adenine nucleotide metabolism (19). Extracellular ADO exerts its biological effects by binding with AR on the cell surface. Three types and four subtypes of AR have been identified, including A1R, A2AR, A2BR and A3R (20). ADO has been reported to have vasodilatory effects in the majority of organs (21), and protects against tissue damage during acute ischemic injury in the heart (22), brain (23), liver (24) and kidney (25). However, extended exposure to a high concentration of ADO has been demonstrated to lead to tissue damage and increased organ dysfunction (26). In previous studies, it has been identified that extracellular ADO continually increases during RIF, and ADO serves an important function in RIF development and kidney dysfunction (9,27). AR inhibitors, such as PT, have been demonstrated to protect kidney function in UUO mice (9,27,28). In order to further understand the function of the AR in RIF development, a hypoxia mouse renal fibroblast model was generated in the current study, in order to dynamically investigate the function of ADO and the associated AR. In the present study, it was observed that A2BR was the predominant receptor type on the surface of the fibroblasts under hypoxia. The specific A2BR inhibitor MRS1754 produced similar effects to the global AR inhibitor 8-PT in renal fibroblast proliferation inhibition (P>0.05), indicating that A2BR was the predominant AR type during hypoxia and ADO increased fibroblast proliferation by binding with A2BR.
During the development of RIF, fibroblasts exhibit smooth muscle cell-like characteristics following a specific transformation, producing myofibroblasts (29). In addition, α-SMA is a known marker of this fibroblast phenotypic transformation (30). Data obtained from animals and humans have clarified the common process of phenotypic transformation of fibroblasts expressing α-SMA into myofibroblasts during CKD development (31–35). As the active form, myofibroblast are important in the progression of fibrosis, by inducing excessive ECM accumulation (36,37). The data from the current study demonstrated that compared with the control group, NECA significantly increased α-SMA mRNA expression levels (P<0.01). Compared with the NECA group, NECA combined with 8-PT or MRS1754 reversed the NECA-induced upregulation of α-SMA mRNA (P<0.05). The inhibition of global AR or A2BR was able to reduce transformation of the fibroblast phenotype, leading to the delay of RIF development and protection of kidney function. No significant differences were observed between 8-PT and MRS1754 in α-SMA expression, indicating that A2BR was the predominant AR type responsible for fibroblast transdifferentiation during hypoxia.
A previous study investigated the involvement of the cytokine regulation network in the development of RIF (38). Under hypoxic ischemia, large quantities of cytokines and chemotactic factors are excreted from stressed cells, resulting in structural alterations and dysfunction of the renal tissue. In the current study, two verified profibrotic cytokines, TGF-β1 and procollagen α1 (I), were investigated. The results demonstrated that compared with the control group, NECA significantly increased TGF-β1 mRNA expression levels (P<0.01), while 8-PT and MRS1754 were able to reverse NECA-induced upregulation of TGF-β1 mRNA (P<0.05). Similar results were observed in the evaluation of procollagen α1 (I) levels. The results suggested that under hypoxia, ADO may accelerate RIF development by inducing the excretion of pro-fibrotic cytokines. However, the inhibition of global AR or A2BR was only able to effectively alleviate disease by inhibiting cytokine synthesis. No significant differences were observed between 8-PT and MRS1754 treatment in the levels of TGF-β1 and procollagen α1 (I) regulation, indicating that A2BR was the predominant receptor type for fibroblast profibrotic cytokine excretion under hypoxia.
In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that ADO was important in the regulation of biological behavior in fibroblasts, and A2BR was identified as the predominant receptor type on the surface of fibroblasts under conditions of hypoxia. The inhibition of A2BR significantly reduced the proliferation and activation of fibroblasts, and reduced the excretion of profibrotic cytokines, thus preventing RIF development. The current study suggests that A2BR may be a novel target in the treatment of RIF.
Acknowledgments
The current study was supported by the Science and Technology program of Hunan Scientific Committee (grant no. 2012FJ3134) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81470925).
References
Noronha IL, Fujihara CK and Zatz R: The inflammatory component in progressive renal disease - are interventions possible? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 17:363–368. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Badid C, Vincent M, Fouque D, Laville M and Desmoulière A: Myofibroblast: A prognostic marker and target cell in progressive renal disease. Ren Fail. 23:543–549. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Roberts IS, Burrows C, Shanks JH, Venning M and McWilliam LJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts: Predictors of progression in membranous nephropathy. J Clin Pathol. 50:123–127. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Razzaque MS and Taguchi T: Cellular and molecular events leading to renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Med Electron Microsc. 35:68–80. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeisberg M, Strutz F and Müller GA: Renal fibrosis: An update. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 10:315–320. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eddy AA: Molecular basis of renal fibrosis. Pediatr Nephrol. 15:290–301. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fredholm BB: Adenosine, an endogenous distress signal, modulates tissue damage and repair. Cell Death Differ. 14:1315–1323. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eltzschig HK, Thompson LF, Karhausen J, Cotta RJ, Ibla JC, Robson SC and Colgan SP: Endogenous adenosine produced during hypoxia attenuates neutrophil accumulation: Coordination by extracellular nucleotide metabolism. Blood. 104:3986–3992. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang J, Jiang X, Zhou Y, Xia B and Dai Y: Increased adenosine levels contribute to ischemic kidney fibrosis in the unilateral ureteral obstruction model. Exp Ther Med. 9:737–743. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chunn JL, Mohsenin A, Young HW, Lee CG, Elias JA, Kellems RE and Blackburn MR: Partially adenosine deaminase-deficient mice develop pulmonary fibrosis in association with adenosine elevations. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 290:L579–L587. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chunn JL, Molina JG, Mi T, Xia Y, Kellems RE and Blackburn MR: Adenosine-dependent pulmonary fibrosis in adenosine deaminase-deficient mice. J Immunol. 175:1937–1946. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chunn JL, Young HW, Banerjee SK, Colasurdo GN and Blackburn MR: Adenosine-dependent airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in partially adenosine deaminase-deficient mice. J Immunol. 167:4676–4685. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Strutz F and Zeisberg M: Renal fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 17:2992–2998. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen CZ and Raghunath M: Focus on collagen: in vitro systems to study fibrogenesis and antifibrosis state of the art. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2:72007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Blackburn MR, Volmer JB, Thrasher JL, Zhong H, Crosby JR, Lee JJ and Kellems RE: Metabolic consequences of adenosine deaminase deficiency in mice are associated with defects in alveogenesis, pulmonary inflammation, and airway obstruction. J Exp Med. 192:159–170. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Linden J: Adenosine in tissue protection and tissue regeneration. Mol Pharmacol. 67:1385–1387. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Van Belle H, Goossens F and Wynants J: Formation and release of purine catabolites during hypoperfusion, anoxia, and ischemia. Am J Physiol. 252:H886–H893. 1987.PubMed/NCBI | |
Rego AC, Santos MS and Oliveira CR: Adenosine triphosphate degradation products after oxidative stress and metabolic dysfunction in cultured retinal cells. J Neurochem. 69:1228–1235. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei CJ, Li W and Chen JF: Normal and abnormal functions of adenosine receptors in the central nervous system revealed by genetic knockout studies. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1808:1358–1379. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mi T, Abbasi S, Zhang H, et al: Excess adenosine in murine penile erectile tissues contributes to priapism via A2B adenosine receptor signaling. J Clin Invest. 118:1491–1501. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rudolphi KA, Schubert P, Parkinson FE and Fredholm BB: Adenosine and brain ischemia. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev. 4:346–369. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Schubert P, Rudolphi KA, Fredholm BB and Nakamura Y: Modulation of nerve and glial function by adenosine - role in the development of ischemic damage. Int J Biochem. 26:1227–1236. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhu JF, Tang LM and Li DC: Activation of adenosine 2A receptor attenuating oxidative stress on small-for-size liver transplantation. Chin J Bases And Clin In Gen Surg. 17:243–247. 2010. | |
Grenz A, Osswald H, Eckle T, Yang D, Zhang H, Tran ZV, Klingel K, Ravid K and Eltzschig HK: The reno-vascular A2B adenosine receptor protects the kidney from ischemia. PLoS Med. 5:e1372008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lu Q, Sakhatskyy P, Newton J, et al: Sustained adenosine exposure causes lung endothelial apoptosis: a possible contributor to cigarette smoke-induced endothelial apoptosis and lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 304:L361–L370. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yap SC and Lee HT: Adenosine and protection from acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 21:24–32. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Mubagwa K and Flameng W: Adenosine, adenosine receptors and myocardial protection: an updated overview. Cardiovasc Res. 52:25–39. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Leask A: Towards an anti-fibrotic therapy for scleroderma: targeting myofibroblast differentiation and recruitment. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 3:82010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malmström J, Lindberg H, Lindberg C, et al: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 specifically induce proteins involved in the myofibroblast contractile apparatus. Mol Cell Proteomics. 3:466–477. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohtaka A, Ootaka T, Sato H and Ito S: Phenotypic change of glomerular podocytes in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: Developmental paradigm. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 17(Suppl 9): 11–15. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Jinde K, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Huang XR, Sakai H, Kurokawa K, Atkins RC and Lan HY: Tubular phenotypic change in progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis in human glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. 38:761–769. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Johnson RJ, Iida H, Alpers CE, Majesky MW, Schwartz SM, Pritzi P, Gordon K and Gown AM: Expression of smooth muscle cell phenotype by rat mesangial cells in immune complex nephritis. Alpha-smooth muscle actin is a marker of mesangial cell proliferation. J Clin Invest. 87:847–858. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ng YY, Fan JM, Mu W, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Yang WC, Huang TP, Atkins RC and Lan HY: Glomerular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the evolution of glomerular crescent formation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 14:2860–2872. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eddy AA: Molecular insights into renal interstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 7:2495–2508. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang G, Moorhead PJ and el Nahas AM: Myofibroblasts and the progression of experimental glomerulonephritis. Exp Nephrol. 3:308–318. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hewitson TD, Wu HL and Becker GJ: Interstitial myofibroblasts in experimental renal infection and scarring. Am J Nephrol. 15:411–417. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ling H, Li X, Jha S, Wang W, Karetskaya L, Pratt B and Ledbetter S: Therapeutic role of TGF-beta-neutralizing antibody in mouse cyclosporin A nephropathy: Morphologic improvement associated with functional preservation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 14:377–388. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |