Twist promotes invasion and cisplatin resistance in pancreatic cancer cells through growth differentiation factor 15
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 27, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3867
- Pages: 3841-3848
Abstract
Introduction
Pancreatic cancer (PC) is an aggressive and devastating disease with a poor prognosis (1). It is the eighth most common cause of cancer-associated mortality in the world (2,3) and leads to 227,000 mortalities worldwide every year. The 5-year survival rate in patients with PC is <5% (4). Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for solid tumors (5), is effective as a single agent or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of PC (6,7).
Twist, also known as Twist1, belongs to the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor family. A high expression of Twist has been detected in several types of cancer and has been associated with the initial phase of metastatic progression (8). A previous study demonstrated that Twist is upregulated in PC tissues, suggesting that Twist is involved in the progression of PC (9).
Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), also termed macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1, is a divergent member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. It has multiple roles in various pathologies, including inflammation, cancer, cardiovascular diseases and obesity (10,11). In cancer, GDF15 has been reported to have tumorigenic and anti-tumorigenic activities (11,12). Although the role of GDF15 in tumorigenesis is most likely not universal in all types of cancer, it is elevated in the serum of PC patients compared with healthy controls and those with benign pancreatic neoplasms (13,14). A previous study has demonstrated that serum GDF15 could be used as a diagnostic biomarker with high sensitivity and specificity for identifying PC (15).
These previous studies suggest that Twist and GDF15 are involved in PC progression. However, the roles of Twist and GDF15 in PC remain to be elucidated. The present study examined the interaction between Twist and GDF15 in PC cell invasion and chemoresistance to cisplatin.
Materials and methods
Cell lines, plasmids and reagents
The human PC cell lines ASPC-1 (CRL-1682) and BXPC-3 (CRL-1687) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Twist (sc-38604-V) and GDF15 (sc-39798-V) shRNA lentiviral particles, control shRNA lentiviral particles-A (cat. no. sc-108080) and mouse anti-human monoclonal Twist antibody (Twist2C1a; cat. no. sc-81417), mouse anti-human GDF-15 monoclonal antibody (G-5; cat. no. sc-377195) and mouse anti-human matrix metalloproteinase-2 monoclonal antibody (MMP-2; cat. no. sc-53630) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The SensoLyte 520 MMP-2 Assay kit (cat. no. AS-71151) was purchased from AnaSpec (Fremont, CA, USA). The QCM ECMatrix 24-well (8 μM) Fluorimetric Cell Invasion Assay kit (cat. no. ECM554) was purchased from Chemicon (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Superfect transfection reagent was purchased from Qiagen (Valencia, CA, USA). The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) Assay kit (cat. no. 9820) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA, USA). Human Twist cDNA was subcloned into a pcDNA 3.1 expression vector (16). Full-length human GDF15 cDNA (MCG: 4145) vector was purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The human GDF15 expression vector (pcDNA3-GDF15) was constructed by subcloning the GDF15 cDNA vector following digestion with EcoRI and NotI into the pcDNA3.1 expression vector (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Puromycin, G418, cisplatin, the selective p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 and all chemicals of reagent grade were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Transfection and lentiviral transduction
The Twist or GDF15 expression vector was transfected into cells using Superfect transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Pools of stable transductants were generated via selection with G418 (600 μg/ml) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Twist or GDF15 shRNA lentiviral particles contain expression constructs encoding target-specific 19–25 nt (plus hairpin) shRNA designed to specifically knock-down Twist or GDF15 gene expression. The control shRNA lentiviral particles contain a scrambled shRNA sequence that does not lead to specific degradation of any cellular mRNA and was used as a negative control. Lentiviral transduction was performed in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells. Pools of stable transductants were generated via selection with puromycin (4 μg/ml) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.).
Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RNA was prepared from cells using TRIzol reagent followed by purification using a TURBO DNA-free kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). The cDNAs were synthesized using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). qPCR was performed on the LightCycler thermal cycler system (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA) using an SYBR Green I kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were normalized against that of the housekeeping gene glyceral-dehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the same sample. The primers used are as follows: Human GDF15, forward 5′-CGGTGAATGGCTCTCAGATG-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGGTCCTCGTAGCGTTTCC-3′; human GAPDH, forward 5′-GACTCATGACCACAGTCCATGC-3′ and reverse 5′-AGAGGCAGGGATGATGTTCTG-3′. Each experiment was repeated three times in duplicate.
Cell invasion assay
In vitro cell invasion assays were performed with the QCM ECMatrix 24-well (8 μM) Fluorimetric Cell Invasion Assay kit (Chemicon; Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions (17,18). The kit used an insert polycarbonate membrane with an 8 μM pore size. The insert in the invasion kit was coated with a thin layer of ECMatrix. Cell invasion was determined by fluorescence. Each experiment was repeated three times in duplicate.
Western blot analysis
Cells were dissolved in 250 μl of 1X SDS loading buffer (62.5 mm TrisHCl, pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 25% glycerol, 0.01% bromphenol blue, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol) and incubated at 95°C for 10 min. Equal quantities of proteins for each sample were separated by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride microporous membrane (Millipore). Membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with a 1:500 dilution of the following primary antibodies: Anti-Twist, anti-GDF-15, and anti-MMP-2, and then washed and revealed using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated bovine anti-mouse secondary antibodies (cat. no. sc-2371; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., 1:5,000, 1 h). Peroxidase was revealed with a GE Healthcare ECL kit (Shanghai, China). Three independent experiments were performed for each western blot analysis.
MMP-2 activity assay
MMP-2 activity was measured with the SensoLyte 520 MMP-2 Assay kit (AnaSpec) according to the manufacturer's instructions (19,20). The supernatants were collected and then incubated with 4-aminophenylmercuric acetate and MMP-2 substrate. The fluorescence intensity at Ex/Em wavelengths of 490 nm/520 nm were used as a measure of MMP-2 activity. Each experiment was repeated three times in duplicate.
Cisplatin chemosensitivity assay
Cells were plated in triplicate in 96-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells. After 24 h of incubation, the medium was replaced by fresh medium with or without various concentrations of cisplatin (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 15.0, 30.0, or 55.0 mM) (Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, cell viability was assayed 48 h later using a modified MTT assay as previously described (21). The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were defined as the concentrations resulting in a 50% reduction in growth compared with control cell growth.
p38 MAPK activity assay
p38 MAPK activity was measured using the p38 MAPK Assay kit (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions (22). Briefly, cells were directly lysed in the culture dishes. Cell lysates were sonicated and centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing equivalent quantities of protein (200 μg) was incubated by gentle rocking with 20 μl of immobilized mouse anti-human phospho-p38-MAPK monoclonal antibody (28B10; cat. no. 9216; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; 1:500) for 16 h at 4°C. The immunoprecipitates were washed twice with the lysing buffer and pelleted by centrifu-gation at 20,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The p38 MAPK assay was performed using activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) fusion protein (2 μg) as a substrate in the presence of 200 μM ATP and 1X kinase buffer according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were resolved on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and visualized by autoradiography.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 19.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons of means among multiple groups were performed with one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc pairwise comparisons using Tukey's test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Overexpression and knockdown of Twist and GDF15 in human PC cells
To investigate the functional interaction between Twist and GDF15 in PC cells, Twist and GDF15 were stably overexpressed in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 human PC cells by stable transfection. By contrast, the cells were also stably transduced with lentiviral shRNAs to knock down Twist and GDF15, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1, Twist and GDF15 were constitutively expressed in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells. Compared with the controls, Twist was overexpressed >4.8 fold and knocked down >80% in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively; GDF was overexpressed >4.2 fold and knocked down >80% in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively. GDF15 expression in the cells increased (by >3.3 fold) and decreased (>60%) in parallel with Twist overexpression and knockdown, respectively. By contrast, overexpression and knockdown of GDF15 had no significant effect on Twist expression (Fig. 1). Our pilot study suggested that Twist regulates GDF15 expression in PC cells by a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism (data not shown). Therefore, a selective p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 μM) was included in all experiments in the present study (23). As shown in Fig. 1, the p38 MAPK inhibitor had no significant effect on the constitutive expression level of Twist, whereas it eradicated Twist-induced GDF15 expression in PC cells. RT-qPCR assays revealed a similar data trend (Fig. 2), suggesting that Twist regulates GDF15 expression at the mRNA level.
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of Twist and GDF15 on PC cell invasion and MMP-2 expression/activity
To examine the individual effect of and interaction between Twist and GDF15 on PC cell invasion, in vitro cell invasion assays were performed. Compared with the controls, overexpression of Twist increased cell invasion by 3.4 and 2.1 fold in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively, which was eradicated by knockdown of GDF15 or SB203580 (10 μM; Fig. 3). By contrast, knockdown of Twist decreased cell invasion by ~60% in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively, which was completely reversed by overexpression of GDF15 (Fig. 3). Compared with the controls, overexpression of GDF15 increased cell invasion by 3.7 fold in ASPC-1 cells and 2.3 fold in BXPC-3 cells, whereas knockdown of GDF15 decreased cell invasion by ~85% in the two cell lines (Fig. 3).
MMPs have a critical role in cancer cell invasion (24). Among the different MMPs assessed, MMP-2 expression was found to be significantly altered by Twist and GDF15 in PC cells (data not shown). Compared with the controls, overexpression of Twist increased MMP-2 expression by 3.9 and 2.5 fold in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively, which was eradicated by knockdown of GDF15 or SB203580 (10 μM; Fig. 4). By contrast, knockdown of Twist decreased MMP-2 expression by 51% in ASPC-1 and 43% in BXPC-3 cells, which was completely reversed by overexpression of GDF15 (Fig. 4). Compared with the controls, overexpression of GDF15 increased MMP-2 expression by 4.1 fold in ASPC-1 cells and 2.5 fold in BXPC-3 cells, whereas knockdown of GDF15 decreased MMP-2 expression by ~80% in the two cell lines (Fig. 4). A similar data trend was observed with MMP-2 activity (Fig. 5).
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of Twist and GDF15 on PC cell chemoresistance to cisplatin
To examine the individual effect of and interaction between Twist and GDF15 on PC chemoresistance, cisplatin IC50 values were examined in PC cells. A higher IC50 value was considered to correspond with clinical chemoresistance to cisplatin. As shown in Fig. 6, after 48 h of cisplatin treatment, the cisplatin IC50 values for ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells were 5.6 and 6.1 μM, respectively. Overexpression of Twist significantly increased the IC50 values to 20.5 and 12.7 μM, respectively, which was eradicated by knockdown of GDF15 or SB203580 (10 μM; Fig. 6). By contrast, knockdown of Twist decreased the IC50 values to 2.3 and 3.4 μM, which was completely reversed by overexpression of GDF15 (Fig. 6). Overexpression of GDF15 increased the IC50 values of ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells to 23.2 and 15.4 μM, respectively, while knockdown of GDF15 decreased the IC50 values to 1.3 and 2.1 μM, respectively (Fig. 6).
Effects of overexpression and knockdown of Twist and GDF15 on p38 MAPK activity in PC cells
The above results suggested that Twist promotes PC cell invasion and chemoresistance to cisplatin largely through regulating GDF15 expression by a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism. Therefore, the individual effect of and interaction between Twist and GDF15 on p38 MAPK activity was next examined, which was measured by phosphorylation of ATF2, a substrate of activated p38 MAPK (22). As evidenced by increased levels of phosphorylated ATF2, overexpression of Twist induced p38 MAPK activity by 4.2 and 3.9 fold in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, respectively, which was eradicated by SB203580 (10 μM) but not knockdown of GDF15 (Fig. 7). By contrast, knockdown of Twist decreased p38 MAPK activity by ~70% in ASPC-1 and BXPC-3 cells, which was not significantly affected by overexpression of GDF15 (Fig. 7). Compared with the controls, overexpression and knockdown of GDF15 demonstrated no significant effect on p38 MAPK activity (Fig. 7).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that Twist promotes PC cell invasion and cisplatin chemoresistance largely through GDF15. Overexpression and knockdown of Twist in PC cells increased and decreased the expression of GDF15, respectively, at the mRNA and the protein levels, but not vice versa. The findings suggest that Twist induces GDF15 expression in PC cells at the gene transcription/mRNA level. In addition, a selective p38 MAPK inhibitor readily eliminated Twist-induced GDF15 expression in PC cells without significantly altering the expression of Twist, indicating that Twist induces GDF15 expression in a p38 MPAK-dependent manner in PC cells. How Twist transcriptionally regulates the expression of GDF15 through p38 MAPK in PC cells will be examined in future studies.
As evidenced by gene overexpression and knockdown experiments, Twist and GDF15 individually promotes PC cell invasion and cisplatin resistance. In addition, knockdown of GDF15 eradicated the stimulatory effects of overexpressing Twist, while overexpression of GDF15 completely reversed the inhibitory effects of knocking down Twist. The findings indicate that GDF15 is functionally downstream of Twist and largely mediates the promoting effects of Twist on PC cell invasion and cisplatin resistance, which corroborates our finding that Twist induces GDF15 expression in PC cells.
While the selective p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 abrogated the promoting effects of Twist overexpression on PC cell invasion and cisplatin resistance, overexpression of GDF15 significantly augmented PC cell invasion and cisplatin resistance in the presence of SB203580. The results suggest that Twist and GDF15 act functionally upstream and downstream of p38 MAPK, respectively. This is in agreement with our findings that while overexpression and knockdown of Twist increased and decreased p38 MAPK activity, respectively, GDF15 demonstrated no significant effect on p38 MAPK activity in PC cells. Previous studies have suggested an important role of p38 MAPK in PC cell invasion (25,26). Our findings indicate that p38 MAPK mediates Twist-induced GDF15 expression in PC cells, which markedly promotes PC cell invasion. Thus, the importance of p38 MAPK signaling in PC progression is at least partially fulfilled through Twist/GDF15 signaling.
MMPs are critical for cancer cell invasion (17,18). Previous studies have suggested that MMP-2 is important for PC cell invasion in vitro (26). In the present study, it was found that Twist markedly increased MMP-2 expression/activity through GDF15, suggesting that the Twist/GDF15 signaling axis is important for PC progression. GDF15 has been reported to have tumorigenic and anti-tumorigenic activities (11,12). While Twist has been widely associated with the initial phase of metastatic progression (8), a previous study demonstrated that Twist decreases cisplatin resistance in osteosarcoma cells, suggesting that Twist, like GDF15, has a dual role in cancer cell malignancy and chemoresistance, depending on tissue specificity (27). Since Twist and GDF15 have been found to be overexpressed in various types of cancer (8,28), it would be of significance to define the role of the Twist/GDF15 signaling axis in other types of cancer besides PC in future studies.
In conclusion, the present study for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, demonstrated that Twist promotes PC cell invasion and cisplatin chemoresistance through inducing GDF15 expression by a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism. This adds new insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying PC progression and chemoresistance.
References
Jiang H, Duan B, He C, et al: Cytoplasmic HSP90α expression is associated with perineural invasion in pancreatic cancer. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7:3305–3311. 2014. | |
Spano JP, Chodkiewicz C, Maurel J, et al: Efficacy of gemcitabine plus axitinib compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: An open-label randomised phase II study. Lancet. 371:2101–2108. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
López R, Méndez CM, Fernández MJ, et al: Phase II trial of erlotinib plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer (XELTA study). Anticancer Res. 33:717–723. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hidalgo M: Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 362:1605–1617. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chung TW, Choi HJ, Kim SJ, et al: The ganglioside GM3 is associated with cisplatin-induced apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. PLoS One. 9:e927862014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gresham GK, Wells GA, Gill S, Cameron C and Jonker DJ: Chemotherapy regimens for advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 14:4712014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ramfidis VS, Psyrri A, Syrigos KN and Saif MW: First line treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Looking for the step forward. JOP. 15:286–288. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Entz-Werlé N, Choquet P, Neuville A, et al: Targeted apc;twist double-mutant mice: A new model of spontaneous osteosarcoma that mimics the human disease. Transl Oncol. 3:344–353. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohuchida K, Mizumoto K, Ohhashi S, et al: Twist, a novel oncogene, is upregulated in pancreatic cancer: Clinical implication of Twist expression in pancreatic juice. Int J Cancer. 120:1634–1640. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Breit SN, Johnen H, Cook AD, et al: The TGF-β superfamily cytokine, MIC-1/GDF15: A pleotrophic cytokine with roles in inflammation, cancer and metabolism. Growth Factors. 29:187–195. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mimeault M and Batra SK: Divergent molecular mechanisms underlying the pleiotropic functions of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in cancer. J Cell Physiol. 224:626–635. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khaled YS, Elkord E and Ammori BJ: Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1: A review of its pleiotropic actions in cancer. Cancer Biomark. 11:183–190. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Koopmann J, Buckhaults P, Brown DA, et al: Serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 as a marker of pancreatic and other periampullary cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 10:2386–2392. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ozkan H, Demirbaş S, Ibiş M, Akbal E and Köklü S: Diagnostic validity of serum macrophage inhibitor cytokine and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen in pancreatobiliary diseases. Pancreatology. 11:295–300. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen YZ, Liu D, Zhao YX, Wang HT, Gao Y and Chen Y: Diagnostic performance of serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis. DNA Cell Biol. 33:370–377. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matsuo N, Shiraha H, Fujik T, et al: Twist expression promotes migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 9:2402009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang B, Feng P, Xiao Z and Ren EC: LIM and SH3 protein 1 (Lasp1) is a novel p53 transcriptional target involved in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 50:528–537. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng Y, Hu J, Ma J, et al: RNAi-mediated silencing of VEGF-C inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression by simultaneously down-regulating the CXCR4, CCR7, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3-dependent axes-induced ERK, p38 and AKT signalling pathways. Eur J Cancer. 47:2353–2363. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jo YK, Park SJ, Shin JH, et al: ARP101, a selective MMP-2 inhibitor, induces autophagy-associated cell death in cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 404:1039–1043. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Qazi H, Shi ZD and Tarbell JM: Fluid shear stress regulates the invasive potential of glioma cells via modulation of migratory activity and matrix metalloproteinase expression. PLoS One. 6:e203482011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ding X, Zhang Z, Li S and Wang A: Combretastatin A4 phosphate induces programmed cell death in vascular endothelial cells. Oncol Res. 19:303–309. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Wu H and Miller AH: Interleukin 1alpha (IL-1alpha) induced activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibits glucocorticoid receptor function. Mol Psychiatry. 9:65–75. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Leelahavanichkul K, Amornphimoltham P, Molinolo AA, Basile JR, Koontongkaew S and Gutkind JS: A role for p38 MAPK in head and neck cancer cell growth and tumor-induced angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Mol Oncol. 8:105–118. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Li Y, Liao Q, Li K, Zhong D, Weng X and Mi M: Knockdown of endothelin A receptor expression inhibits osteosarcoma pulmonary metastasis in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. Mol Med Rep. 5:1391–1395. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cui XP, Qin CK, Zhang ZH, et al: HOXA10 promotes cell invasion and MMP-3 expression via TGFβ2-mediated activation of the p38 MAPK pathway in pancreatic cancer cells. Dig Dis Sci. 59:1442–1451. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pan F, Ma S, Cao W, et al: SDF-1α upregulation of MMP-2 is mediated by p38 MAPK signaling in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Mol Biol Rep. 40:4139–4146. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu J, Liao Q, He H, Zhong D and Yin K: TWIST interacts with β-catenin signaling on osteosarcoma cell survival against cisplatin. Mol Carcinog. 53:440–446. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bauskin AR, Brown DA, Kuffner T, et al: Role of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 in tumorigenesis and diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Res. 66:4983–4986. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |