Rapid method of luxS and pfs gene inactivation in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and the effect on biofilm formation

  • Authors:
    • Xiaoxu Wang
    • Shiyu Li
    • Xiaoran Lu
    • Pan Hu
    • Haiyan Chen
    • Zheng Li
    • Zhaoyang Bu
    • Xulong Lang
    • Xinglong Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 9, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4532
  • Pages: 257-264
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Rapid and efficient inactivation of a target gene in Escherichia coli chromosomes is required to investigate metabolic engineering. In the present study, a multiple gene inactivation approach was demonstrated in four strains of enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), which are the predominant pathogenic bacteria causing piglet diarrhea, mediated by λ Red and Xer recombination. The chromosomal genes, luxS and pfs were inactivated using the multiple gene inactivation approach in the wild‑type strains of E. coli, K88, K99, 987P and F41. This indicated that dif sites may be reused to inactivate multiple chromosomal genes when no antibiotic‑resistant selectable markers remain. Following inactivation of luxS and pfs, the ability of ETEC to produce the quorum sensing signal, and induce auto‑inducer 2 activity and biofilm formation were significantly reduced. Furthermore, the multiple gene inactivation approach also exhibits a high recombination efficiency and follows a simple process.

Introduction

Rapid and efficient inactivation of genes in microorganisms is an important process, which enables the analysis of physiological and genetic characteristics of bacteria. In recent years, chromosome gene deletion technology of Escherichia coli has developed rapidly. The method of λ Red and FLP recombination, as described by Datsenko and Wanner (1), is a popular method to delete genes in E. coli. Baba et al (2) reported that the single gene mutation of various strains of E. coli was constructed using this method. The process of building multiple gene deletion strains, in order to remove the resistance genes in the mutant strains, required repeated transformation or removal of the auxiliary plasmid, which complicates the experimental process and elongates the experimental cycle. Dif sites are identified by the Xer recombinant enzyme in E. coli, which simplifies the procedure. It has been reported that one gene was successfully deleted from an E. coli chromosome using the λ Red and Xer recombination system (3). However, whether it is suitable for multiple gene deletion in different strains and the efficiency of such deletions have not, to the best of our knowledge, been reported.

During bacterial growth specific signal molecules are secreted allowing the bacteria to monitor the population density in the surrounding environment and adjust the expression of multiple genes. This is known as quorum sensing (QS) and uses signal molecules, termed autologous inducers (AIs). In type II QS, luxS and pfs genes are significant genes, involved in AI-2 synthesis (4). The pathogenic association between bacteria and host is complex and diverse; numerous studies demonstrate that the QS system of pathogenic bacteria aids in a variety of biological functions, including biofilm formation, virulence factor production, drug resistance and adhesion (5).

Biofilms are formed by bacteria adhering to surfaces and extracellular matrices (6). The biofilms of certain pathogenic bacteria are formed on the surface of tissues and organs, as well as on the surface of medical devices, which results in complications due to infection (7). According to statistical analyses, the majority of bacterial infections are caused by biofilms, which result in drug resistance, but also compromise the host immune system, markedly impacting the prevention and treatment of bacterial infection (8). Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is the main cause of piglet diarrhea, a particularly serious piglet disease, and an important cause of piglet mortality. The current study focuses on enterohemorrhagic (EHEC) and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC). In addition, there are few studies, to the best of our knowledge, regarding ETEC, thus the present study investigates the effect of luxS and pfs gene deletion on biofilm formation, in order to further elucidate the effects of virulence factor gene expression and the association with drug resistance.

Materials and methods

DNA manipulation

Pfu DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to generate polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products for cloning and gene insertion, and ReddyMix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Beijing, China) was used for screening of colonies by PCR, according to standard PCR protocols. Restriction enzymes (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Changchun, China), T4 DNA ligase (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), and the PCR Purification Clean-Up kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Bacterial strains and media

Four strains of ETEC served as targets in the gene integration experiments. ETEC and E. coli DH5α (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Junfeng Bioengineering Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and antibiotic medium (Junfeng Bioengineering Co., Ltd.), in liquid broth and 1.5% agar plates containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin (Junfeng Bioengineering Co., Ltd.). All bacterial cultures were incubated at 37°C, with agitation at 200 rpm for liquid cultures. Strains and plasmids used in the present study are described in Table I.

Table I

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the current study.

Table I

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in the current study.

Strain or plasmidDescriptionSerial numberSource
Strain
E. coli K88Type F4 adhesinCVCC1525CVMMC
E. coli K99Type F5 adhesinCVCC232CVMMC
E. coli 987PType F6 adhesinCVCC209CVMMC
E. coli F41Type F41 adhesinCVCC231CVMMC
V. harveyi BB120AI-2 detectionBAA-1116ATCC
V. harveyi BB170AI-2 detectionBAA-1117ATCC
E. coli DH5αHost of clone plasmidTakara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.
Plasmid
 pMD18-TVector for cloning polymerase chain reaction productsTakara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.
 pJN105Cloning gentamicin resistance geneInvitrogen Life Technologies
 pKD46Promote E. coli chromosomal gene integrationInvitrogen Life Technologies

[i] E. coli, Escherichia coli; V. harveyi, Vibrio harveyi; AI-2, auto-inducer 2; CVMMC, Chinese veterinary microorganisms management center; ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.

Preparation of the homology arms with the gentamicin (GM) resistance gene

The luxS and pfs genes from four types of ETEC were amplified using the primers, luxS forward (F), luxS reverse (R), pfs F and pfs R. These PCR products were cloned into pMD-18T to create plasmids, p18T-luxS or p18T-pfs. The GM resistance gene was amplified from the pJN105 plasmid using primers, difGM F and difGM R (Table II.) This primer incorporated a 3′ region of a gene encoding GM resistance and a 5′ tail that included a 28-bp E. coli dif site (dif E. coli: GGT GCG CAT AAT GTA TAT TAT GTT AAAT). The plasmids, p18T-luxS and p18T-pfs were digested using EcoRV restriction enzyme, and the GM resistance gene with dif sites was cloned into the plasmids forming p18T-luxS-difGM or p18T-pfs-difGM plasmids.

Table II

PCR primers used in the current study.

Table II

PCR primers used in the current study.

NameSize (nt)Sequence (5′ to 3′)Function of PCR product
luxS
 F22 ATGCCGTTGTTAGATAGCTTCA
 R22 GATGTGCAGTTCCTGCAACTTCluxS gene amplification
Pfs
 F22 TGGTAAACTATGCCTTCAAATC
 R19 GTACGACAACAAACGGGACpfs gene amplification
GM
 F28 GGTGCGCATAATGTATATTATGTTAAATGentamicin resistance and gene amplification
 R27 ATTTAACATAATATACATTATGCGCACC
difGM
 F56 ACTTCCTAGAATATATATTATGTAAACTGentamicin resistance gene and mplification with dif site
GGTGCGCATAATGTATATTATGTTAAAT
 R55 AGTTTACATAATATATATTCTAGGAAGT
ATTTAACATAATATACATTATGCGCACC

[i] PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GM, gentamicin; F, forward; R, reverse.

The p18T-luxS-difGM and p18T-pfs-difGM plasmids were digested with both EcoRI and PstI restriction enzymes, and the DNA fragments were recovered and amplified using the luxS F, luxS, Pfs F and Pfs R primers to transform the E. coli.

Preparation of competent cells and plasmid transformation

The plasmid, pKD46 was transformed into ETEC, as described by De Mey et al (9). The four strains of ETEC, with the pKD46 plasmid, were cultured in LB medium at 30°C and oscillated at 180 rpm for 12 h. Bacteria (0.1 ml) was added to 1 ml LB medium containing 1 µg/ml ampicillin and 2 mmol/l L-arabinose (Spectrum Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and cultured at 30°C, with oscillation at 180 rpm. Bacteria were grown until reaching an optical density (OD600) value of ~0.6. The culture was then placed in ice-cold water for 20 min, and the bacteria were centrifuged at 6,000 × g for 10 min, washed once with ice-cold water and washed twice with ice-cold 10% glycerol (Shanghai Seagull Trading Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) prior to collection for electroporation.

Bacterial transformation and ETEC chromosomal gene integration

The luxS or pfs gene DNA fragment (on plasmids, including the GM resistance gene and dif sites) were mixed with competent cells and placed in an electroporation cuvette (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). An electrical pulse was applied to the competent cells at 1,800 V for 5 µsec and were then placed in LB broth containing 1 mmol/l L-arabinose. The cells were cultured at 30°C, oscillated at 180 rpm for 1 h and plated on GM-selective agar (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Beijing, China). The bacteria was inoculated in LB medium with GM, cultured at 30°C and oscillated at 180 rpm for 24 h. This procedure was repeated twice following which the cells were appropriately diluted with LB culture without GM and plated on a solid LB agar to exclude the strains that were unable to grow on the agar with GM. These bacteria were further identified by PCR.

Crystal violet (CV) method for quantification of biofilm formation

Biofilm assays on 6-well plates were performed, as described by Hossain and Tsuyumu (10) with certain modifications. For quantitative analysis of biofilm production, an overnight culture was grown in biofilm-inducing medium (Junfeng Bioengineering Co., Ltd.) to an OD600 of ~2.0 and diluted at 1:20. Culture medium was added to each plate and incubated for 24 h at 30°C without agitation. To remove the loosely associated bacteria, the culture was removed from the wells and rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. CV (2%; Beijing Noble Laser Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) solution was added to each well to stain the bacteria and the culture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The wells were rinsed with Milli-Q water (Shanghai Seagull Trading Co., Ltd.) and 95% ethanol was added to each CV-stained well. Absorbance (600 nm) was measured using a QFLC-7001 spectrophotometer (HKY Technology Co.,Ltd, Beijing, China). Six-well plates were used per experiment, and the entire experiment was performed in triplicate.

AI-2 activity assay

The AI-2 activity in cell-free E. coli culture fluids was measured using the Vibrio harveyi BB170 bioluminescence reporter assay, at 6,000 × g for 10 min (11,12). Cell-free culture fluids were prepared by filtration of liquid cultures (13,14) or by centrifugation, as described above. AI-2 activity was evaluated as light production compared to background light obtained with the appropriate E. coli growth medium. Liquid supernatant of V. harveyi BB120 served as the control group and E. coli DH5α served as the negative control.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as means ± standard deviation and analyzed using SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Group differences were compared using Student's t-test and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Gene integration and selectable marker excision

A schematic of the gene integration approach in E. coli using λ Red and Xer recombination is presented in Fig. 1. The target gene from the ETEC bacteria was amplified and cloned into the pMD18-T vector. Appropriate restriction sites in the target gene were selected; however, when there was no suitable restriction site, reverse PCR amplification was used to obtain two homologous arm vectors. Fragments of the antibiotic resistance genes with dif sites at the two terminals were inserted into the target gene (in the present study, a GM resistance gene was used). The fragment, including the selectable gene, dif sites and homologous arms, was obtained from the vector by PCR amplification or restriction enzyme digestion. The fragment and pKD46 vector were subsequently transformed into ETEC. The target gene was excised as the mutated ETEC recombines with the dif site to excise the selectable gene using Xer recombination.

Construction of recombinant vector

The mutation method for the luxS and pfs genes was the same, therefore, the method for luxS gene inactivation is presented. The luxS gene was amplified with primers luxS F and luxS R, and cloned into the vector, pMD18-T. The vector, pMD-luxS, was then digested by the restriction enzyme, EcoRV, and the fragment of GM resistance gene with dif sites at the two terminals was cloned into the vector. EcoRI and HindIII restriction enzymes were used to digest the vector of pMD-luxS-difGM in order to obtain the fragment from homologous recombination (Fig. 2). Two products are produced following digestion; the vector, pMD18-T and the fragment of homologous recombination.

Recombination of four strains of ETEC

Four strains of ETEC produced the same results, thus, the data presented is of E. coli K88. Three randomly selected bacteria were inoculated in LB medium with GM, amplified by GM F and GM R to produce a 1,000-bp product (Fig. 3). Amplification by luxS F and luxS R produces two products at ~1,500 and 500 bp (Fig. 4). Bacteria were then subcultured a third time, and amplified by luxS F and luxS R producing one product at ~500 bp (Fig. 5). Sequencing of the products indicated a 28-bp fragment was successfully inserted into the luxS gene (Fig. 6). These findings indicate that inactivation of the luxS and pfs genes had been successful.

Effect of mutant strains on biofilm formation

The ability to form biofilms was observed in four strains of ETEC and is presented in Fig. 7. The ability to form biofilms was detected by crystal violet staining in both the deletion plates and the wild-type. It was demonstrated that the absorbance of the deletion plates were significantly lower compared with the wild-type, suggesting that deletion of the luxS gene resulted in a decreased ability to form biofilms. Results of ultraviolet spectrophotometry indicating absorption are presented in Table III.

Table III

Absorbance of four strains of ETEC bacteria.

Table III

Absorbance of four strains of ETEC bacteria.

Absorbance l/(g·cm)
BacteriaK88K99987PF41
Deletion0.21±0.040.44±0.110.16±0.090.22±0.08
Wild-type 1.17±0.11a1.21±0.13a1.57±0.19a1.39±0.21a

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn3-mmr-13-01-0257'] } Absorbance measured to determine ability to form biofilms in ETEC bacteria following deletion of luxS and pfs genes, analyzed for significant differences between deletion and wild-type bacteria.

a P<0.01. ETEC, enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli.

AI-2 activity detection

V. harveyi BB170 was used to assay the AI-2 level of ETEC. Liquid supernatant of V. harveyi BB120 served as the control group, E. coli DH5α served as the negative control (Fig. 8). AI-2 secretion was significantly decreased following deletion of the luxS gene.

Discussion

The present study demonstrated a simple and rapid technique for selectable marker gene deletion following gene integration in bacteria, which should be applicable to all prokaryotes with the ubiquitous Xer recombination system (15). The fragment, including a selectable gene, dif sites and the chromosomal target gene was amplified by PCR, or cloned into a plasmid, and then integrated into the chromosome. ETECs that have undergone Xer recombination at dif sites during continuous culture (and have, therefore, lost the resistance gene) are identified by antibiotic sensitivity testing and verified by PCR.

Competent cells of E. coli demonstrate a sharp peak of transformation efficiency at an OD600 value of ~0.4 when the electroporation method is applied (16); Datsenko and Wanner (1) reported that the value was ~0.6, however the present study indicated that a value of ~0.8–1.0 obtains greater transformation efficiency. This value varies in previous studies, therefore, it is hypothesized that peak transformation efficiency varies with the strains and should be determined prior to experimentation (17). Datsenko and Wanner (1) used homologous arm fragments (length, 50 bp) to conduct recombination, however, the current study observed that the efficiency of homologous recombination using a fragment of ~200 bp was ten times greater than using a 50-bp fragment. In the current study, the luxS or pfs genes of ETEC were replaced with a GM resistance gene by homologous recombination. As the chromosome mutation is irreversible, the exogenous gene is highly stable in the bacteria. Throughout the present study, the efficiency of recombination was observed to be reduced when using fresh competent cells, however the efficiency was increased when the competent cells were placed in the refrigerator at −80°C for 24 h or longer. This was observed in the four strains of ETEC that were investigated, whether the deleted gene was luxS, pfs, or ack (data not shown). The reason for this has not been determined in the current study, however, is an important factor in recombination efficiency. The Xer recombination system deletes selected genes with a homologous arm fragment by recognizing the dif site of E. coli after the homologous arm has been exchanged with the chromosome. In the process of multiple gene deletion, the plasmid (such as pKD46) used in λ Red recombination was maintained within the strain and used to delete another gene, further simplifying the experimental procedure. A previous study demonstrated that dif site recombination is not affected by antibiotic use (3). The GM resistance gene can be removed by Xer recombination, and upon addition of GM to the culture medium, a 28-bp fragment remains in the luxS or pfs gene. The recombination efficiency of the Xer system is high. Fig. 4 presents results from the first subculture, demonstrating production of two products at ~1,500 and 500 bp. The product at ~1,500 bp was the bacterial chromosome fragment resulting from λ Red recombination, while the ~500-bp fragment had undergone Xer recombination. The bright bands at ~500 bp suggests that the majority of bacteria used the Xer system. Fig. 5 demonstrates the third subculture, the presence of only the 500 bp product suggests all bacteria had undergone λ Red and Xer recombination. Previous research has speculated that multiple dif sites on a chromosome may recombine again in the process of culture, leading to unstable characteristics of gene mutant strains (18). In the current study, two dif sites were used to mutate the luxS and pfs genes, therefore the chromosome of the strains exhibited two dif sites, however the sites did not recombine in subsequent culture. The findings of the present study may enhance the methods of gene mutation of ETEC. More than ten ETEC genes were deleted in the present study and these strains lost the corresponding characteristic during fermentation. For example, K88 and K99 have a hemolysin toxin encoded by hlyA. The ability to destroy red blood cells was significantly decreased after deletion of the hlyA gene. The fliC gene was deleted which encoded the major flagellin protein and thus, biofilm formation was reduced in the fliC gene mutant strain. Finally, the EtpA gene was deleted, which encoded the adhesin protein. This resulted in a reduction in biofilm formation.

QS is a cell-to-cell signaling process in bacteria enabling control of gene expression and synchronizing activities that are beneficial only at a high population density (19). QS functions via the production, secretion and detection of small molecules termed AIs; however production and detection of the majority of AIs is restricted to a single species. AI-2 (expressed by the luxS gene) is an exception as it is widely distributed in different strains of bacteria and controls distinct traits (5,20,21). As a result of these characteristics, it is proposed that AI-2 is used during interspecies communication. AI-2 was discovered in V. harveyi and previous studies have demonstrated that certain organisms use AI-2 in the regulation of genes, which determine various functions, including expression of virulence factors in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (22,23), EHEC O157:H7 (24), P. gingivalis (25,26), Streptococcus pyogenes (27), Vibrio cholerae (2830), and Vibrio vulnificus (31); motility in Campylobacter jejuni (32), EHEC O157:H7 and EPEC E. coli O127:H6 (33,34); cell division in E. coli W3110 and EHEC O157:H7 (35,36); production of antibiotics in Photorhabdus luminescens (37); biofilm formation in Streptococcus gordonii (38); and an AI-2 ATP binding cassette-type transporter in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (39). This previous research demonstrates the wide variety of bacteria using AI-2 to control a diverse range of function-specific genes.

Previous studies suggest that the expression of virulence factors and metabolism of E. coli bacteria were regulated by the luxS gene (40). Further analysis determined that luxS performs a variety of functions, regulates the expression of hundreds of genes, determines population density and regulates biofilm formation by synthesis of AI-2 signal molecules. In addition, exogenous AI-2 enhances biofilm formation and the mechanism may function via the expression of flagella, which induce bacterial activity (4143); however, these previous studies focused on EHEC and EPEC or other strains of E. coli. In the current study, four strains of ETEC were used and it was demonstrated that the ability to form biofilms was significantly reduced without the luxS gene (Fig. 7 and Table III). The result suggests that the effect of luxS on biofilm formation in ETEC is widespread, with the largest impact observed on 987P and the smallest on K99. Current research on ETEC is minimal, therefore, the aim of the present study was to demonstrate that multiple gene inactivation to delete the luxS gene (or other genes) may be used to evaluate the influence of AI-2 on biofilm formation, the associated drug resistance and virulence factors in order to contribute to the prevention and treatment of piglet diarrhea.

In conclusion, gene inactivation by λ Red and Xer recombination is a rapid, efficient and stable method for deletion of ETEC genes. Deletion of luxS and pfs significantly reduces the activity of AI-2 and the ability of ETEC to form biofilms. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the effect of QS on the expression of virulence genes and drug resistance.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2014M552581).

References

1 

Datsenko KA and Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:6640–6645. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL and Mori H: Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: The Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2:2006.00082006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bloor AE and Cranenburgh RM: An efficient method of selectable marker gene excision by Xer recombination for gene replacement in bacterial chromosomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 72:2520–2525. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Beeston AL and Surette MG: pfs-dependent regulation of autoinducer 2 production in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 184:3450–3456. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Xavier KB and Bassler BL: LuxS quorum sensing: More than just a numbers game. Curr Opin Microbiol. 6:191–197. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Costerton JW, Stewart PS and Greenberg EP: Bacterial biofilms: A common cause of persistent infections. Science. 284:1318–1322. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Kozlova EV, Popov VL, Sha J, Foltz SM, Erova TE, Agar SL, Horneman AJ and Chopra AK: Mutation in the S-ribosylhomocysteinase (luxS) gene involved in quorum sensing affects biofilm formation and virulence in a clinical isolate of Aeromonas hydrophila. Microb Pathog. 45:343–354. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Hancock V, Dahl M and Klemm P: Probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 outcompetes intestinal pathogens during biofilm formation. J Med Microbiol. 59:392–399. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

De Mey M, De Maeseneire S, Soetaert W and Vandamme E: Minimizing acetate formation in E. coli fermentations. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 34:689–700. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Hossain MM and Tsuyumu S: Flagella-mediated motility is required for biofilm formation by Erwinia carotovora subsp. carotovora. J Gen Plant Pathol. 72:34–39. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Bassler BL, Wright M, Showalter RE and Silverman MR: Intercellular signalling in Vibrio harveyi: Sequence and function of genes regulating expression of luminescence. Mol Microbiol. 9:773–786. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Bassler BL, Wright M and Silverman MR: Multiple signalling systems controlling expression of luminescence in Vibrio harveyi: Sequence and function of genes encoding a second sensory pathway. Mol Microbiol. 13:273–286. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Surette MG and Bassler BL: Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:7046–7050. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Surette MG and Bassler BL: Regulation of autoinducer production in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 31:585–595. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Recchia GD and Sherratt DJ: Conservation of xer site-specific recombination genes in bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 34:1146–1148. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Sambrook J and Russell DW: Molecular cloning: A laboratory Manual. 3rd Edn. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. pp. 1.199–1.122

17 

Li Zhou, Dan-Dan Niu, Ning Li, Xian-Zhong Chen, Gui-Yang Shi and Zheng-Xiang Wang: Multiple gene inactivation approach in Escherichia coli mediated by a combination of red recombination and Xer recombination. Microbiology China. 37:923–928. 2010.

18 

Zhou L, Niu DD, Li N, Chen XZ, Shi GY and Wand ZX: Multiple gene inactivation approach in Escherichia coli mediated by a combination of red recombination and Xer recombination. Microbiol China. 37:923–928. 2010.

19 

Xavier KB and Bassler BL: Regulation of uptake and processing of the quorum-sensing autoinducer AI-2 in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 187:238–248. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar :

20 

Federle MJ and Bassler BL: Interspecies communication in bacteria. J Clin Invest. 112:1291–1299. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Surette MG, Miller MB and Bassler BL: Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: A new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:1639–1644. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Fong KP, Chung WO, Lamont RJ and Demuth DR: Intra-and interspecies regulation of gene expression by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans LuxS. Infect Immun. 69:7625–7634. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Fong KP, Gao L and Demuth DR: luxS and arcB control aerobic growth of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans under iron limitation. Infect Immun. 71:298–308. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar :

24 

Sperandio V, Mellies JL, Nguyen W, Shin S and Kaper JB: Quorum sensing controls expression of the type III secretion gene transcription and protein secretion in enterohemorrhagic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:15196–15201. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Burgess NA, Kirke DF, Williams P, Winzer K, Hardie KR, Meyers NL, Aduse-Opoku J, Curtis MA and Cámara M: LuxS-dependent quorum sensing in Porphyromonas gingivalis modulates protease and haemagglutinin activities but is not essential for virulence. Microbiology. 148:763–772. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Chung WO, Park Y, Lamont RJ, McNab R, Barbieri B and Demuth DR: Signaling system in Porphyromonas gingivalis based on a LuxS protein. J Bacteriol. 183:3903–3909. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Lyon WR, Madden JC, Levin JC, Stein JL and Caparon MG: Mutation of luxS affects growth and virulence factor expression in Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol Microbiol. 42:145–157. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Lenz DH, Mok KC, Lilley BN, Kulkarni RV, Wingreen NS and Bassler BL: The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell. 118:69–82. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Miller MB, Skorupski K, Lenz DH, Taylor RK and Bassler BL: Parallel quorum sensing systems converge to regulate virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Cell. 110:303–314. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Zhu J, Miller MB, Vance RE, Dziejman M, Bassler BL and Mekalanos JJ: Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:3129–3134. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kim SY, Lee SE, Kim YR, Kim CM, Ryu PY, Choy HE, Choy SS and Rhee JH: Regulation of Vibrio vulnificus virulence by the LuxS quorum-sensing system. Mol Microbiol. 48:1647–1664. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Elvers KT and Park SF: Quorum sensing in Campylobacter jejuni: Detection of a luxS encoded signalling molecule. Microbiology. 148:1475–1481. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Girón JA, Torres AG, Freer E and Kaper JB: The flagella of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli mediate adherence to epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol. 44:361–379. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Sperandio V, Torres AG and Kaper JB: Quorum sensing Escherichia coli regulators B and C (QseBC): A novel two-component regulatory system involved in the regulation of flagella and motility by quorum sensing in E. coli. Mol Microbiol. 43:809–821. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

DeLisa MP, Wu C-F, Wang L, Valdes JJ and Bentley WE: DNA microarray-based identification of genes controlled by autoinducer 2-stimulated quorum sensing in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 183:5239–5247. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Sperandio V, Torres AG, Girón JA and Kaper JB: Quorum sensing is a global regulatory mechanism in enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Bacteriol. 183:5187–5197. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Derzelle S, Duchaud E, Kunst F, Danchin A and Bertin P: Identification, characterization, and regulation of a cluster of genes involved in carbapenem biosynthesis in Photorhabdus luminescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 68:3780–3789. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

McNab R, Ford SK, El-Sabaeny A, Barbieri B, Cook GS and Lamont RJ: LuxS-based signaling in Streptococcus gordonii: autoinducer 2 controls carbohydrate metabolism and biofilm formation with Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol. 185:274–284. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar :

39 

Taga ME, Semmelhack JL and Bassler BL: The LuxS-dependent autoinducer AI-2 controls the expression of an ABC transporter that functions in AI-2 uptake in Salmonella typhimurium. Molecular Microbiology. 42:777–793. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Walters M and Sperandio V: Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. Int J Med Microbiol. 296:125–131. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Beloin C, Roux A and Ghigo J-M: Escherichia coli biofilms. Bacterial Biofilms. Romeo T: Springer; Berlin Heidlberg: pp. 249–289. 2008, View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Naves P, del Prado G, Huelves L, Gracia M, Ruiz V, Blanco J, Dahbi G, Blanco M, Ponte MC and Soriano F: Correlation between virulence factors and in vitro biofilm formation by Escherichia coli strains. Microb Pathog. 45:86–91. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Yamaguchi Y, Park JH and Inouye M: MqsR, a crucial regulator for quorum sensing and biofilm formation, is a GCU-specific mRNA interferase in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 284:28746–28753. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2016
Volume 13 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang X, Li S, Lu X, Hu P, Chen H, Li Z, Bu Z, Lang X and Wang X: Rapid method of luxS and pfs gene inactivation in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and the effect on biofilm formation. Mol Med Rep 13: 257-264, 2016
APA
Wang, X., Li, S., Lu, X., Hu, P., Chen, H., Li, Z. ... Wang, X. (2016). Rapid method of luxS and pfs gene inactivation in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and the effect on biofilm formation. Molecular Medicine Reports, 13, 257-264. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4532
MLA
Wang, X., Li, S., Lu, X., Hu, P., Chen, H., Li, Z., Bu, Z., Lang, X., Wang, X."Rapid method of luxS and pfs gene inactivation in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and the effect on biofilm formation". Molecular Medicine Reports 13.1 (2016): 257-264.
Chicago
Wang, X., Li, S., Lu, X., Hu, P., Chen, H., Li, Z., Bu, Z., Lang, X., Wang, X."Rapid method of luxS and pfs gene inactivation in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and the effect on biofilm formation". Molecular Medicine Reports 13, no. 1 (2016): 257-264. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4532