Survivin activates NF‑κB p65 via the IKKβ promoter in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Wei Zeng
    • Hui Li
    • Yan Chen
    • Hongbo Lv
    • Ling Liu
    • Jihua Ran
    • Xiaohong Sun
    • Shayahati Bieerkehazhi
    • Yining Liu
    • Xiaomiao Li
    • Wenting Lai
    • Jibieke Watibieke
    • Meiliwuerti Dawulietihan
    • Xiumei Li
    • Huiwu Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 30, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4737
  • Pages: 1869-1880
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Survivin and transcription factor p65 (NF‑κB p65) participate in the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the mechanism of NF‑κB p65 activation in ESCC remains to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of survivin in the activation of NF‑κB p65 in ESCC. The expression levels of survivin, NF‑κB p65, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit α (IKKα) and inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit β (IKKβ) were detected in ESCC tissue samples. Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were cultured and survivin activity was modulated via transfection with an overexpression plasmid, a small hairpin RNA plasmid and a specific inhibitor. Quantitative reverse transcription‑polymerase chain reaction and western blotting assays were conducted to assess the effects of survivin on the expression levels of IKKα, IKKβ and NF‑κB p65. Cell cycle and apoptosis assays were conducted to detect survivin‑dependent cellular behavior changes. In addition, the luciferase reporter gene assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay were conducted to determine the genomic sites responsible for survivin‑induced activation of NF‑κB p65. The present study demonstrated that the expression of survivin is positively correlated with IKKα and IKKβ in ESCC tissues. Survivin affected the mRNA and protein expression levels of IKKα, IKKβ, and NF‑κB p65 in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells. Furthermore, survivin increased the transcriptional activity of the IKKβ promoter and bound to the IKKβ promoter region in the Eca109 cells. Downregulation of survivin arrested the cell cycle at the G2/M phase and induced apoptosis. Results of the present study suggest that survivin activates NF‑κB p65 in Eca109 cells via binding to the IKKβ promoter region and upregulating IKKβ promoter transcriptional activity. Survivin overexpression activates NF‑κB p65, which is important in the acquisition and maintenance of the oncogenic characteristics of ESCC.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer is a prevalent type of cancer worldwide and is ranked sixth among cancer-associated mortalities (1). According to a recent study, in 2008 ~482,000 new esophageal cancer cases were diagnosed and 407,000 cancer-associated mortalities occurred globally (1). Almost half of newly diagnosed esophageal cancer cases occurred in China (2,3). Northern China is a high-incidence area for esophageal cancer and has been termed the Asian esophageal cancer belt (4). The highest-incidence areas of China include Linxian (Henan), Cixian (Hebei), Huai'an (Jiangsu) (57), a high incidence is also observed in Xinjiang, which has a population of various ethnic groups (3).

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant histological type of esophageal cancer in China, which contributes to >90% of all esophageal cancer incidences. Less common types include esophageal adenocarcinomas, melanoma, leiomyosarcoma and small-cell carcinoma (814).

Currently, esophageal cancer is treated using surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, biotherapy, or a combination of these modalities (15). Despite improvements in surgical techniques and adjuvant chemoradiation, the overall 5-year survival rate of esophageal cancer has remained <10% in the USA (16). As the long-term survival rate is correlated with the clinical stage of esophageal cancer (17), early diagnosis and treatment would contribute to improving survival rates and the quality of life of esophageal cancer patients. However, early diagnosis is difficult as the majority of early-stage cases of esophageal cancer are asymptomatic (18).

Suppression of apoptosis is a notable biological behavior of cancer, and it is crucial in the oncogenesis and progression of ESCC (1921). Elucidation of the regulatory mechanisms underlying gene expression in the process of apoptosis may contribute to early diagnosis and personalized therapy for ESCC patients.

Survivin is the smallest member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family, and is important in the regulation of apoptosis (22). Survivin expression levels are correlated with the clinicopathological parameters and prognosis of esophageal cancer patients (2327). Furthermore, overexpression of survivin has been associated with an increased likelihood of tumor relapse and poor overall survival (28,29). Thus, survivin detection has been used as a biomarker for monitoring tumor recurrence, and survivin has been targeted as a personalized therapeutic strategy in clinical trials (3035).

The molecular mechanisms of high survivin expression in tumor tissues include amplification of the survivin locus (36), demethylation of the survivin promoter (37) and increased promoter activity (38). Furthermore, previous studies have observed that transcription factors, such as nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) (39), are important for increased survivin transcription activity. Activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway contributes to tumor progression by blocking apoptosis via upregulation of survivin (40,41).

NF-κB is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates immunoglobulin (Ig) κ light chain expression in B lymphocytes (42,43). The mammalian genome encodes five NF-κB subunits: RelA (p65), RelB, c-Rel and NF-κB1 (p50 and its precursor, p105), and NF-κB2 (p52 and its precursor, p100) (42).

Activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway is significantly associated with reduced overall survival in patients with ESCC (44,45). Inhibition of the NF-κB signaling pathway thus represents a promising approach for treatment of ESCC (46). However, the mechanism underlying activation of transcription factor p65 (NF-κB p65), which participates in the NF-κB canonical signaling pathway in ESCC, remains to be elucidated.

As NF-κB p65 and survivin contribute to regulating apoptosis, and are highly expressed or persistently activated in tumorigenesis and progression of ESCC (32,47), the present study hypothesized that survivin activates NF-κB p65 by regulating the expression levels of inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit β (IKKβ) or inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit α (IKKα) in ESCC. Thus, the aim of the current study was to investigate this hypothesis and establish the role of survivin in the activation of NF-κB p65 in ESCC.

Materials and methods

Tumor tissue specimens

Forty pairs of ESCC and healthy adjacent esophageal tissue samples were obtained from surgically excised specimens of ESCC from patients at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Ürümqi, China) between July and December 2013. The tumor and adjacent healthy tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately following resection. The patients in the current study had not received chemotherapy or radiation therapy prior to surgery. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Written informed consent was provided by the families of all of the patients.

Cell culture

The Eca109 cell line was purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Zhejiang Tianhang Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

The KYSE150 cell line was purchased from the Beijing Institute of Cancer (Beijing, China). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.

LV3-survivin shRNA interference plasmid construction

The LV3 vector was purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The small hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting sequences for survivin and the control are presented in Table I. The sequences were inserted between the HindIII and XhoI sites of the LV3 vector, which yielded LV3-survivin shRNA and LV3-control shRNA plasmids (synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co. Ltd.). The constructs were verified by DNA sequence analysis.

Table I

shRNA targeting sequences for survivin and the control.

Table I

shRNA targeting sequences for survivin and the control.

Target geneshRNA targeting sequence, 5′→3′
Survivin GAAAGTGCGCCGTGCCATCTTCAAGAGAGATGGCACGGCGCACTTTCTT
Control GCGCGCACAATCTACGCTAGTTTCAAGAGAACTAGCGTAGATTGTGCGCGCTT

[i] shRNA, short hairpin RNA.

GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid construction

The GV142 plasmid was purchased from GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). For the GV142-survivin overexpression and GV142-control plasmid construction, GV227 (GeneChem Co., Ltd.) was used as the template, and the survivin and control polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers used are presented in Table II. The resulting PCR products were inserted into the GV142 vector between HindIII and XhoI sites, yielding GV142-survivin overexpression and GV142-control plasmids.

Table II

Primers for GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid and the GV142-control plasmid construction.

Table II

Primers for GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid and the GV142-control plasmid construction.

Target genePrimers, 5′→3′
ForwardReverse
Survivin TGCCAAGCTTATGGGTGCCCCGACGTTGC TCCGCTCGAGTATCCATGGCAGCCAGCTGCTC
Control TTATGGGTGCCCCGACGTTGC TCCGCTCGAGTATCCTGCCAAGCATGGCAGCCAGCTGCTC
Plasmid transient transfection

Prior to transfection, 2×105 cells/well were placed into 6-well plates cultivated in serum-free culture medium and antibiotics, and grown overnight until they reached 70–80% confluence. Plasmid transfection was performed using Lipofectamine™ 2000 transfection reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. The plasmids and Lipofectamine™ 2000 were diluted in Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) separately and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The diluted solutions were mixed and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the mixtures were added to each well containing cells and medium. The cells with only the transfection reagent served as a blank control. Cell culture plates were incubated for 6 h at 37°C in a CO2 incubator. Culture medium containing 10% FBS was added and cells were incubated under the above-mentioned conditions.

YM155 treatment and cell viability assay

Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 cells/well in a volume of 100 μl culture medium per well. After 24 h, cells were exposed to survivin inhibitor, YM155 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) at various concentrations (0, 0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 5 and 50 μM) for 48 h. Following incubation at 37°C, 0.4% Trypan Blue solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each well. Viability was assessed by counting the relative number of live, unstained cells to total cells, and the half-inhibitory concentration (IC50) for YM155 was derived from a logarithmic plot.

Cells treated with YM155 (concentrations at, above and below the IC50) were harvested at 48 h, and the total RNA and protein was extracted to determine the expression levels of survivin, IKKα, IKKβ and NF-κB p65 by reverse transcription quantitative (RT-q) PCR and western blotting.

RT-qPCR

At 48 h post-transfection, total cellular RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) following the manufacturer's protocol. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA using Maloney Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) and an oligo-deoxy-thymine nucleotide primer (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocols. DNA content was measured using a UV/visible spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 2000; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK). Primer sequences are presented in Table III. Primers used in the current study were synthesized by Shanghai Shenggong Biology Engineering Technology Service, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). RT-qPCR assays used the TaqMan® Fast Virus 1-Step Master mix kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The reaction system was: 12 μl SYBR® green reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 0.2 μM each primer, 1 μl cDNA template, and 6 μl nuclease-free distilled water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH served as an internal standard to evaluate the relative expression levels of the target genes. qPCR analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems® 7500 Fast Real Time PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The PCR conditions, performed for 40 cycles, were as follows: 2 min at 50°C, 2 min at 95°C, 15 sec at 95°C, 15 sec at 55–60°C, 1 min at 72°C. The relative quantification transcript levels were determined using the 2−ΔΔCq method. Specificities of all PCR amplifications were confirmed by melting curve analysis. All experiments were performed in triplicate and results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Table III

Primers for survivin, NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Table III

Primers for survivin, NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Target genePrimers, 5′→3′
Product size, bp
ForwardReverse
Survivin ACCGAGACCTAAAGTCCAAC AGACAGATAGCCACGACCC305
NF-κB GTCTTCGTGCTCGGTGATG AGGACCTCTGACCCAAATG147
IKKβ TTTACAGTATGCCTCCACC GTTTACTCCCGTCTGCTTC365
IKKα GCCCTTGTCCCTGTCCCTA GCAGAGTATTTCCCTTTGGTTTGA374
GAPDH TCTTAGGGAAGGTCAGCATT GCCTCTAGTTCCYYGGCATCA325

[i] NF-κB, nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit β; IKKα, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit α.

Western blotting assays

At 48 h post-transfection, total protein was extracted, by washing twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and resuspended in lysis buffer [1 M Tris HCl (pH 7.4), 5M NaCl, 0.5 M ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 0.5 M EDTA, NP-40, 10% SDS (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd., Wuhan, China), glycerine, 10 μg/μl aprotinin, 10 μg/μl leupeptin, 10 μg/μl Pepstatin A, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, double-distilled H2O] for 30 min on ice. Suspensions were centrifuged at 18,407 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing the protein was collected and the protein concentration of each lysate was determined by Pierce BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Protein (20 μg) was loaded for each sample. Proteins were denatured, subjected to SDS-PAGE using 10–15% polyacrylamide gels (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.), electrophoresed (stacking gel, 60 V for 45 min; separating gel, 100 V for 90 min) and electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk (Sigma-Aldrich) in Tris-buffered saline and Tween-20 (TBST; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.,Beijing,China) at room temperature for 2 h. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following primary antibodies: Rabbit polyclonal anti-GAPDH (1:400; cat. no. BA2913; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.), which served as a loading control; rabbit polyclonal anti-survivin (1:1,000; cat. no. sc-10811; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.); rabbit polyclonal anti-phosphorylated (p)-NF-κB p65 (pSer536) (1:1,000; cat. no. AF2006; Affinity Biosciences, Cell Signal Transduction, Cincinnati, OH, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-NF-κB p65 (1:400; cat. no. BA0610; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.); rabbit polyclonal anti-IKKα (1:400; cat. no. BA1594-2; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.); and rabbit polyclonal anti-IKKβ (1:400; cat. no. BA4458-2; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.) were blocked in TBST. Membranes were washed three times (10 min per wash) with TBST at room temperature. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with appropriate horseradish peroxidase-linked goat anti-rabbit secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:1,000 (cat. no. BA1054; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd.) diluted in TBST for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

Luciferase reporter gene assay

The human IKKβ promoter sequences (3,000 bp upstream) and random control sequence (size, 3,000 bp) were obtained by PCR amplification and inserted between the HindIII and XhoI sites of the pGL3 vector (Promega Corporation) yielding pGL3-IKKβ and pGL3-random control plasmids (synthesized by GeneChem Co., Ltd.). Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were seeded at 5×105 cells per well in 6-well dishes one day prior to transfection. The cells were co-transfected with 0.1 μg pGL3-random control, pGL3-IKKβ or pGL3-basic firefly luciferase reporter construct, 0.01 μg pRL-TK Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid and the GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid, using Lipofectamine™ 2000. pRL-TK Renilla luciferase reporter plasmid was co-transfected to assess the transfection efficiency. Post-transfection (48 h), cells were harvested and lysed with 1X lysis buffer (Promega Corporation). Cell extracts (20 μl) were assayed for luciferase activity using the Dual-luciferase Reporter assay system kit (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Relative levels of reporter gene expression were expressed as ratios of firefly luciferase activity to Renilla luciferase (LU/RL). All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP)

ChIP assays were performed using the EZ ChIP™ kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were transfected with the GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid and fixed with 1% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min. The Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were washed twice with 1X PBS, lysed, and sonicated to reduce DNA lengths to within the range of 200–1,000 bp. The survivin/DNA complexes were incubated with 4 μg rabbit antibody against survivin, 1 μl Normal Mouse IgG (dilution, 1:1,000), which served as the negative control, and 1 μl Anti-RNA Polymerase II (dilution, 1:1,000; both included in the EZ-ChIP™ kit) served as the positive control. The mixes were incubated at room temperature for 60–90 min. The immune complexes were precipitated, eluted, reverse-crosslinked and treated with proteinase K [Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co.,Ltd., Beijing, China]. The resulting DNA samples were amplified using primers for the putative survivin site in the human IKKα and IKKβ promoter region. The primer sequences are presented in Table IV. PCR fragments were separated and visualized on 1.8% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (Shanghai Bioleaf Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). The ratios of the PCR products of survivin (IKKα, IKKβ and NF-κB p65) to GAPDH were used to determine the expression levels of target genes.

Table IV

Promoter-specific primers for IKKα and IKKβ used in the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay.

Table IV

Promoter-specific primers for IKKα and IKKβ used in the chromatin immunoprecipitation assay.

Target genePrimer, 5′→3′Product site, bp
IKKα promoter-1F: TGTGGATGGAGGCGTAGAG
R: AGCCAGAAGGGAAGAATGAG
Upstream, 2596–2576
IKKα promoter-2F: GAATCCTCCAGGGAGACCAAAGTAA
R: TTACTTTGGTCTCCCTGGAGGATTC
Upstream, 1758–1737
IKKα promoter-3F: CCCTGACATAACCCCAGCCACA
R: ACAGCCCCACCATCCCCATT
Upstream, 267–247
IKKα promoter-4F: GCCCTTCAGGAGCAACTAA
R: TGACGCCTACCATAGCACTC
Upstream, 1695–1675
IKKα promoter-5F: TCAAGGCGATAATGCTCACT
R: TCTCCACTTTCAGCCGTTT
Upstream, 801–781
IKKα promoter-6F: CAAGGTGGACTAGGGTTGTAAA
R: TGTGAGAATCTAATGCCTGATG
Upstream, 1402–1424
IKKα promoter-7F: AAATAACTTGCTCCATACCCTG
R: GGGGAATGGCAGTTGTGA
Upstream, 788–808
IKKα promoter-8F: TCTTGGGTAGGGAAGTATGGG
R: GGTCTGGGAAGTCTTGCTTTA
Upstream, 1197–1006
IKKα promoter-9F: AGTTTATAGGGCAAGAATCGAG
R: GGTAAAGGTAGTATTGGGCAAC
Upstream, 176–156
IKKβ promoter-1F: AAAGAAAGAAACCAAGTAGCCG
R: TGAGGTATTGATAGCAGCAGTG
Upstream, 270–248
IKKβ promoter-2F: TCTTCAGGTTCCTTTGGTAGTT
R: TGAGTTTCTCCGTTTTATGGG
Upstream, 860–849
IKKβ promoter-3F: GGTAGGCAAGGGCAGTTCT
R: GACCGTGCTCACCGATTT
Upstream, 1520–1502

[i] F, forward; R, reverse; IKKα, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit α; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit β.

Flow cytometric analysis

For cell cycle analysis, DNA labeling was conducted using the Cycle Test Plus DNA reagent kit (BestBio Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Labeling with propidium iodide (PI) and Annexin V was performed using an Annexin V staining kit (BestBio Co. Ltd.) for the detection of apoptotic cells and the assays were performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were directly incubated, at 37°C for 48 h, in 6-well plates and collected 48 h following transfection. For the cell cycle analysis, the cells were washed with PBS for 5 min and subsequently centrifugation at 900 × g. The cells were collected and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol (Saihongrui Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) for a minimum of 2 h at 4°C, followed by treatment with 0.2 mg/ml RNase A (EMD Millipore) in PBS for 30 min at 37°C. PI was added (final concentration, 25 μg/ml) and the cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. Analysis of the samples was conducted within 24 h. For the apoptosis assay, the transfected cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 195 μl 1X Binding Buffer (EMD Millipore) to a concentration of 1×104 cells/ml. Annexin V (5 μl) and PI were gently mixed with the cells and incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. The dyes were washed out by centrifugation for 5 min at 94 × g and the cells were resuspended in 190 μl 1X Binding Buffer. PI staining solution (10 μl) was gently mixed in and incubated on ice and in the dark. The samples were analyzed within 1 h. All samples for the two assays consisted of 10,000 cells and were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting with a BD FACSMicroCount™ system (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. All data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation from three experiments. The two-tailed Student's t-test was used to analyze the difference between groups and Fisher's exact test was used to analyze correlation between groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Survivin expression is positively correlated with IKKα and IKKβ expression in ESCC tissue samples

The expression levels of survivin, IKKα, IKKβ and NF-κB p65 were evaluated by RT-qPCR in 40 paired ESCC and healthy tissue samples, as presented in Table V. In the present study, the expression of survivin was observed to be positively correlated with IKKα (r =0.370; P<0.05) and IKKβ mRNA expression levels (r =0.341; P<0.05) in ESCC samples.

Table V

Association between survivin and NF-κB p65, IKKα, and IKKβ mRNA expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma samples.

Table V

Association between survivin and NF-κB p65, IKKα, and IKKβ mRNA expression levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma samples.

ParameterIKKα
IKKβ
NF-κB p65
+++
Survivin
+2242061610
7768104
Statistical value
r0.3700.3410.154
P-value0.0190.0310.350

[i] IKKα, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit α; IKKβ, inhibitor of nuclear factor κB kinase subunit β; NF-κB, nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; r, correlation coefficient.

Survivin knockdown deactivates NF-κB signaling in ESCC cells

Cells transfected with LV3-survivin shRNA and LV3-control shRNA plasmids were designated the survivin knockdown group and control group, respectively. The cells cultured with the transfection reagent only were considered as a blank group. At 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested for RT-qPCR and western blotting assays. The RT-qPCR analysis (Fig. 1) demonstrated that expression levels of survivin, NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ were significantly reduced in the survivin knockdown group, compared with the control and blank group in Eca109 (Fig. 1A) and KYSE150 cells (Fig. 1C). Western blotting analysis also demonstrated that protein expression levels of survivin, the p-NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ expression levels were similarly reduced in the survivin knockdown group of the two cell lines (Fig. 1B and D).

YM155 reduces cell viability and downregulates survivin, NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ

YM155, an inhibitor of survivin, was used to investigate the effect of survivin on cell viability, as well as the interaction between survivin and NF-κB p65, IKKα, and IKKβ expression levels in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells. YM155 was administered at concentrations from 0.005 to 50 μM, which significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner in the Eca109 and KYSE150 cells at 48 h following administration. According to the logarithmic curve, the IC50 of YM155 for Eca109 and KYSE150 cells was ~0.5 μM (Fig. 2A). Concentrations at, above, and below the IC50 (0.05, 0.5 and 5 μM) were selected for further experiments.

Eca109 and KYSE150 cells were treated with YM155 at the selected concentrations for 48 h, and the expression levels of survivin and NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ were measured by RT-qPCR and western blotting assays. The results demonstrated that YM155 effectively inhibited mRNA expression levels of survivin and NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ, and protein expression levels of survivin and the p-NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ in Eca109 (Fig. 2B and D) and KYSE150 (Fig. 2C and E) cells, which was comparable with the survivin shRNA knockdown.

Survivin overexpression activates NF-κB signaling in ESCC cells

Cells transfected with GV142-survivin overexpression plasmid and GV142-control plasmid were designated the survivin overexpression group and the control group, respectively. The cells with the transfection reagent only served as the blank group. At 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested for RT-qPCR and western blotting assays. RT-qPCR analysis demonstrated increased mRNA expression levels of survivin, NF-κB p65, IKKα and IKKβ in the survivin overexpres-sion group, when compared with the control group and the blank control group in Eca109 (Fig. 3A and B) and KYSE150 (Fig. 3C and D) cells. In addition, western blotting analysis indicated that the protein levels of survivin, and phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 and IKKβ were also increased in the survivin overexpression group in the Eca109 (Fig. 3B) and KYSE150 (Fig. 3D) cells. Furthermore, KYSE150 cells demonstrated increased expression levels of IKKα protein (Fig. 3D).

Survivin binds to IKKβ promoter and increases the transcriptional activity of the IKKβ promoter in Eca109 cells

To further determine whether survivin recognized and bound to the IKKβ promoter in vivo, and increased its transcriptional activity, the ChIP assay was performed in Eca109 cells. DNA was immunoprecipitated using anti-survivin polyclonal antibodies and subjected to PCR with promoter-specific primers for IKKβ. Positive amplification in Eca109 cell lines demonstrated that survivin may bind the upstream 700 bp IKKβ promoters (Fig. 4A and B).

To investigate whether overexpression of survivin affects the promoter transcriptional activities of IKKβ in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells, a Luciferase reporter gene assay was performed and overexpressed survivin was observed to significantly increase the transcriptional activity of the IKKβ promoter in Eca109 cells, but not in the KYSE150 cells (Fig. 4C).

Survivin knockdown induces apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest in vitro

To analyze the effect of survivin on apoptosis, flow cytometric analysis with PI and Annexin V staining was performed (Fig. 5). Results demonstrated that surviving knockdown and subsequent reduction in activation of NF-κB p65 increased apoptosis in Eca109 (Fig. 5C and D) and KYSE150 (Fig. 5G and H) cells. Conversely, survivin overexpression and concomitant activation of NF-κB p65 decreased apoptosis in Eca109 (Fig. 5A and B) and KYSE150 (Fig. 5E and F) cells.

To analyze the effect of survivin on the cell cycle, flow cytometry was performed. The results indicated that survivin knockdown increased the fraction of cells arrested in the G2/M phase in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells (Fig. 6).

Discussion

Survivin, the smallest member of the IAP family, is overexpressed in ESCC. Survivin detection is correlated with the clinical stage, metastasis, relapse rate and the overall survival of ESCC patients, and provides valuable information to predict the prognosis of ESCC (48,49). The present study demonstrated that survivin overexpression inhibited cell apoptosis and induced cell proliferation. Conversely, survivin knockdown increased cell apoptosis; thus, as survivin inhibits apoptosis it is involved in the progression of ESCC.

Activated NF-κB has been associated with acid-induced esophageal epithelial cell transformation (50). NF-κB nuclear expression was significantly increased in ESCC tissue samples compared with healthy esophageal tissues (5153). NF-κB activation indicates a poorly differentiated cancer and is associated with a low survival rate in ESCC patients (54). Interference with the NF-κB signaling pathway increases the chemotherapeutic sensitivity in ESCC, and suppresses metastasis (55), as activated NF-κB p65 is involved in the progression of ESCC via activating multiple apoptosis-associated genes, including survivin (56,57). However, the underlying mechanism of NF-κB p65 activation in ESCC remains unclear. In the present study, it was observed that survivin regulated the expression of IKKα, IKKβ, and NF-κB p65 in Eca109 and KYSE150 cells. Knockdown of survivin was demonstrated to deactivate NF-κB p65, which induced cell apoptosis and arrested cells in the G2/M phase. Notably, survivin overexpression activated NF-κB p65, inhibiting cell apoptosis and indicating that activation of NF-κB p65 by survivin is potentially important in cell apoptosis, cell proliferation and the progression of ESCC.

NF-κB dimers are observed in the majority of resting cells and retained in the cytosol via interaction with one of the prototypical IκB proteins (58). Extracellular stimulating factor induces degradation of IκB kinase (IKK) proteins upon their phosphorylation by the IKK complex, and inducing NF-κB dimer translocation into the nucleus and resulting in target gene transcription (59). IKKα and IKKβ are important IKKs, which phosphorylate nuclear factor of κ light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor, α (IκBα) proteins and determine NF-κB cytosolic localization (60). The present study demonstrated that overexpression of survivin increased the expression and transcriptional activity of IKKβ in Eca109 cells by binding to the IKKβ promoter. Overexpression of survivin may result in binding of survivin to the IKKβ promoter and increase the transcriptional activity of IKKβ, which phosphorylates IκBα and releases NF-κB p65 to translocate into the nucleus.

In conclusion, survivin performs its biological functions by affecting cell apoptosis and proliferation, and increases the activity of the inducible transcription factor, NF-κB p65 via maintaining a high expression level of IKKβ and upregulating the phosphorylation level of IκBα via IKKβ, and finally releasing NF-κB p65 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in ESCC cells.

The present study provides valuable data toward an increased understanding of constant high expression and activation of NF-κB p65 in ESCC. In addition, investigation into the underlying mechanisms of survivin/NF-κB p65 regulation in the tumorigenesis and progression of ESCC may result in the development of a novel biomarker for the early diagnosis and personalized therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ESCC.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81460359).

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay vvJ, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Holmes RS and Vaughan TL: Epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 17:2–9. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Lin Y, Totsuka Y, He Y, Kikuchi S, Qiao Y, Ueda J, Wei W, Inoue M and Tanaka H: Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in Japan and China. J Epidemiol. 23:233–242. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Wu KS, Huo X and Zhu GH: Relationships between esophageal cancer and spatial environment factors by using Geographic Information System. Sci Total Environ. 393:219–225. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Tran GD, Sun XD, Abnet CC, Fan JH, Dawsey SM, Dong ZW, Mark SD, Qiao YL and Taylor PR: Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the Linxian general population trial cohort in China. Int J Cancer. 113:456–463. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Muñoz N, Crespi M, Grassi A, Qing WC, Qiong S and Cai LZ: Precursor lesions of oesophageal cancer in high-risk populations in Iran and China. Lancet. 1:876–879. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Blot WJ, Li JY, Taylor PR, Guo W, Dawsey SM and Li B: The Linxian trials: Mortality rates by vitamin-mineral intervention group. Am J Clin Nutr. 62(Suppl): 1424S–1426S. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C and Ward EM: Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 19:1893–1907. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Chen CP, Braunstein S, Mourad M, Hsu IC, Haas-Kogen D, Roach M III and Fogh SE: Quality improvement of International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, diagnosis coding in radiation oncology: Single-institution prospective study at University of California, San Francisco. Pract Radiat Oncol. 5:e45–e51. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Macefield RC, Avery KN and Blazeby JM: Integration of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in surgical oncology. Br J Surg. 100:28–37. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Daly JM, Fry WA, Little AG, Winchester DP, McKee RF, Stewart AK and Fremgen AM: Esophageal cancer: Results of an American College of Surgeons Patient Care Evaluation Study. J Am Coll Surg. 190:562–573. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Enzinger PC and Mayer RJ: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 349:2241–2252. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Lepage C, Rachet B, Jooste V, Faivre J and Coleman MP: Continuing rapid increase in esophageal adenocarcinoma in England and Wales. Am J Gastroenterol. 103:2694–2699. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Pohl H and Welch HG: The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 97:142–146. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Kranzfelder M, Büchler P and Friess H: Surgery within multimodal therapy concepts for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): the MRI approach and review of the literature. Adv Med Sci. 54:158–169. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lightdale CJ; American College of Gastroenterology: Esophageal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 94:20–29. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Iizuka T, Isono K, Kakegawa T and Watanabe H; Japanese Committee for Registration of Esophageal Carcinoma Cases: Parameters linked to ten-year survival in Japan of resected esophageal carcinoma. Chest. 96:1005–1011. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Toh Y, Egashira A and Yamamoto M: Epigenetic alterations and their clinical implications in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 61:262–269. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Shang L and Wang M: Molecular alterations and clinical relevance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Med. 7:401–410. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Takeno S, Yamashita S, Takahashi Y, Ono K, Kamei M, Moroga T and Kawahara K: Survivin expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Its prognostic impact and splice variant expression. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 37:440–445. 2010.

21 

Akyürek N, Memiş L, Ekinci O, Köktürk N and Oztürk C: Survivin expression in pre-invasive lesions and non-small cell lung carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 449:164–170. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Altieri DC: Validating survivin as a cancer therapeutic target. Nat Rev Cancer. 3:46–54. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Yang X, Xiong G, Chen X, Xu X, Wang K, Fu Y, Yang K and Bai Y: Polymorphisms of survivin promoter are associated with risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 135:1341–1349. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Kato J, Kuwabara Y, Mitani M, Shinoda N, Sato A, Toyama T, Mitsui A, Nishiwaki T, Moriyama S, Kudo J and Fujii Y: Expression of survivin in esophageal cancer: Correlation with the prognosis and response to chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 95:92–95. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ikeguchi M and Kaibara N: Survivin messenger RNA expression is a good prognostic biomarker for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 87:883–887. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Grabowski P, Kühnel T, Mühr-Wilkenshoff F, Heine B, Stein H, Höpfner M, Germer CT and Scherübl H: Prognostic value of nuclear survivin expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 88:115–119. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Dabrowski A, Filip A, Zgodziński W, Dabrowska M, Polańska D, Wójcik M, Zinkiewicz K and Wallner G: Assessment of prognostic significance of cytoplasmic survivin expression in advanced oesophageal cancer. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 42:169–172. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Mita AC, Mita MM, Nawrocki ST and Giles FJ: Survivin: Key regulator of mitosis and apoptosis and novel target for cancer therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res. 14:5000–5005. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Li C, Li Z, Zhu M, Zhao T, Chen L, Ji W, Chen H and Su C: Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of survivin over-expression in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. PLoS One. 7:e447642012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Altieri DC: Survivin, cancer networks and pathway-directed drug discovery. Nat Rev Cancer. 8:61–70. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Altieri DC: Survivin and IAP proteins in cell-death mechanisms. Biochem J. 430:199–205. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Kanwar JR, Kamalapuram SK and Kanwar RK: Targeting survivin in cancer: The cell-signalling perspective. Drug Discov Today. 16:485–494. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Ryan BM, O'Donovan N and Duffy MJ: Survivin: A new target for anti-cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 35:553–562. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Saito T, Hama S, Izumi H, Yamasaki F, Kajiwara Y, Matsuura S, Morishima K, Hidaka T, Shrestha P, Sugiyama K and Kurisu K: Centrosome amplification induced by survivin suppression enhances both chromosome instability and radiosensitivity in glioma cells. Br J Cancer. 98:345–355. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Sharma H, Sen S, Lo Muzio L, Mariggiò A and Singh N: Antisense-mediated downregulation of anti-apoptotic proteins induces apoptosis and sensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells to chemotherapy. Cancer Biol Ther. 4:720–727. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Islam A, Kageyama H, Takada N, Kawamoto T, Takayasu H, Isogai E, Ohira M, Hashizume K, Kobayashi H, Kaneko Y and Nakagawara A: High expression of Survivin, mapped to 17q25, is significantly associated with poor prognostic factors and promotes cell survival in human neuroblastoma. Oncogene. 19:617–623. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Hattori M, Sakamoto H, Satoh K and Yamamoto T: DNA demethylase is expressed in ovarian cancers and the expression correlates with demethylation of CpG sites in the promoter region of c-erbB-2 and survivin genes. Cancer Lett. 169:155–164. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Li F and Altieri DC: Transcriptional analysis of human survivin gene expression. Biochem J. 344:305–311. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Kawakami H, Tomita M, Matsuda T, Ohta T, Tanaka Y, Fujii M, Hatano M, Tokuhisa T and Mori N: Transcriptional activation of survivin through the NF-kappaB pathway by human T-cell leukemia virus type I tax. Int J Cancer. 115:967–974. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Schreck R, Albermann K and Baeuerle PA: Nuclear factor kappa B: An oxidative stress-responsive transcription factor of eukaryotic cells (a review). Free Radic Res Commun. 17:221–237. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Takizawa BT, Uchio EM, Cohen JJ, Wheeler MA and Weiss RM: Downregulation of survivin is associated with reductions in TNF receptors' mRNA and protein and alterations in nuclear factor kappa B signaling in urothelial cancer cells. Cancer Invest. 25:678–684. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Hayden MS and Ghosh S: Signaling to NF-kappaB. Genes Dev. 18:2195–2224. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Sen R and Baltimore D: Inducibility of kappa immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein Nf-kappa B by a posttranslational mechanism. Cell. 47:921–928. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Scheidereit C: IkappaB kinase complexes: Gateways to NF-kappaB activation and transcription. Oncogene. 25:6685–6705. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Kim HJ, Hawke N and Baldwin AS: NF-kappaB and IKK as therapeutic targets in cancer. Cell Death Differ. 13:738–747. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Karin M: NF-kappaB and cancer: Mechanisms and targets. Mol Carcinog. 45:355–361. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Lin C, Song L, Gong H, Liu A, Lin X, Wu J, Li M and Li J: Nkx2–8 downregulation promotes angiogenesis and activates NF-κB in esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 73:3638–3648. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Zhu H, Wang Q, Hu C, Zhang W, Quan L, Liu M, Xu N and Xiao Z: High expression of survivin predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy. Tumour Biol. 32:1147–1153. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Cao M, Yie SM, Wu SM, Chen S, Lou B, He X, Ye SR, Xie K, Rao L, Gao E and Ye NY: Detection of survivin-expressing circulating cancer cells in the peripheral blood of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its clinical significance. Clin Exp Metastasis. 26:751–758. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Debruyne PR, Witek M, Gong L, Birbe R, Chervoneva I, Jin T, Domon-Cell C, Palazzo JP, Freund JN, Li P, et al: Bile acids induce ectopic expression of intestinal guanylyl cyclase C through nuclear factor-kappaB and Cdx2 in human esophageal cells. Gastroenterology. 130:1191–1206. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Konturek PC, Nikiforuk A, Kania J, Raithel M, Hahn EG and Mühldorfer S: Activation of NFkappaB represents the central event in the neoplastic progression associated with Barrett's esophagus: A possible link to the inflammation and overexpression of COX-2, PPARgamma and growth factors. Dig Dis Sci. 49:1075–1083. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Kang MR, Kim MS, Kim SS, Ahn CH, Yoo NJ and Lee SH: NF-kappaB signalling proteins p50/p105, p52/p100, RelA, and IKKepsilon are over-expressed in oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Pathology. 41:622–625. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Kausar T, Sharma R, Hasan MR, Tripathi SC, Saraya A, Chattopadhyay TK, Gupta SD and Ralhan R: Clinical significance of GPR56, transglutaminase 2, and NF-κB in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Invest. 29:42–48. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Izzo JG, Malhotra U, Wu TT, Ensor J, Luthra R, Lee JH, Swisher SG, Liao Z, Chao KS, Hittelman WN, et al: Association of activated transcription factor nuclear factor kappab with chemo-radiation resistance and poor outcome in esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 24:748–754. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Li B, Li YY, Tsao SW and Cheung AL: Targeting NF-kappaB signaling pathway suppresses tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis of human esophageal cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 8:2635–2644. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Song L, Gong H, Lin C, Wang C, Liu L, Wu J, Li M and Li J: Flotillin-1 promotes tumor necrosis factor-α receptor signaling and activation of NF-κB in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Gastroenterology. 143:995–1005. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Tian F, Zhang C, Tian W, Jiang Y and Zhang X: Comparison of the effect of p65 siRNA and curcumin in promoting apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells and in nude mice. Oncol Rep. 28:232–240. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

58 

Oeckinghaus A and Ghosh S: The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 1:a0000342009. View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Sakurai H, Chiba H, Miyoshi H, Sugita T and Toriumi W: IkappaB kinases phosphorylate NF-kappaB p65 subunit on serine 536 in the transactivation domain. J Biol Chem. 274:30353–30356. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Hayden MS and Ghosh S: S hared principles in NF-kappaB signaling. Cell. 132:344–362. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2016
Volume 13 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zeng W, Li H, Chen Y, Lv H, Liu L, Ran J, Sun X, Bieerkehazhi S, Liu Y, Li X, Li X, et al: Survivin activates NF‑κB p65 via the IKKβ promoter in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep 13: 1869-1880, 2016.
APA
Zeng, W., Li, H., Chen, Y., Lv, H., Liu, L., Ran, J. ... Li, H. (2016). Survivin activates NF‑κB p65 via the IKKβ promoter in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Molecular Medicine Reports, 13, 1869-1880. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4737
MLA
Zeng, W., Li, H., Chen, Y., Lv, H., Liu, L., Ran, J., Sun, X., Bieerkehazhi, S., Liu, Y., Li, X., Lai, W., Watibieke, J., Dawulietihan, M., Li, X., Li, H."Survivin activates NF‑κB p65 via the IKKβ promoter in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Molecular Medicine Reports 13.2 (2016): 1869-1880.
Chicago
Zeng, W., Li, H., Chen, Y., Lv, H., Liu, L., Ran, J., Sun, X., Bieerkehazhi, S., Liu, Y., Li, X., Lai, W., Watibieke, J., Dawulietihan, M., Li, X., Li, H."Survivin activates NF‑κB p65 via the IKKβ promoter in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Molecular Medicine Reports 13, no. 2 (2016): 1869-1880. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4737