Open Access

Long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor inhibits the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53 expression

  • Authors:
    • Peng‑Li Wang
    • Bin Liu
    • Yang Xia
    • Chun‑Feng Pan
    • Teng Ma
    • Yi‑Jiang Chen
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 19, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4913
  • Pages: 3074-3082
  • Copyright: © Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are involved in governing fundamental biological processes, and, in many lncRNAs, the expression level is altered and likely to have a functional role in tumorigenesis, including apoptosis, migration and invasion. The lncRNA‑Low Expression in Tumor (LET), a recently identified lncRNA, was demonstrated to be downregulated in hepatocellular and gallbladder cancer. However, its role in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) requires investigation. The expression level of lncRNA‑LET mRNA in primary ESCC and matched healthy tissues (48 cases) was determined by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction. In addition, the effects of lncRNA-LET on cell apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometric analysis, the regulatory effect of lncRNA‑LET on migration was detected using a wound healing assay and cellular invasion was analyzed by Matrigel‑coated transwell assay. Furthermore, the effect of lncRNA‑LET on cell proliferation was investigated by 5‑ethynyl‑2'-deoxyuridine cell proliferation assay and protein levels of lncRNA-LET targets were analyzed by western blotting. lncRNA-LET expression was decreased in primary ESCC tissues when compared with paired healthy tissues, and was identified to be associated with the clinical features. Overexpression of lncRNA‑LET was observed to inhibit the migration and invasion of ESCC cells, and modulate p53 expression levels in human ESCC cell lines in vitro. These results establish that lncRNA-LET is significant in the regulation of tumor progression and metastasis, and serves as a tumor suppressor in, and therefore has therapeutic potential for, the treatment of human ESCC.

Introduction

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), a highly lethal malignancy, is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and the sixth most common cause of cancer-associated mortality (1). Furthermore, ESCC has become one of the most common types of malignant tumor in China, Japan and Southeast Africa (2,3). In China, ESCC is the predominant subtype and contributes to ~90% of all esophageal cancers (ECs) (4,5). Despite the use of multimodal treatments, such as radical surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the overall prognosis for ESCC remains poor, with 5-year survival rates of 5–45% (68). Although previous studies have demonstrated that alterations of numerous oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes are involved in ESCC, the underlying molecular and genetic mechanism of esophageal carcinogenesis remains largely unknown (9).

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), with transcripts >200 nt in length, which were initially recognized to represent random transcriptional noise, have been implicated in numerous biological behaviors, such as epigenetic regulation, chromatin modification, transcription and post-transcriptional processing (1012). Increasing evidence has revealed the contribution of lncRNAs as proto-oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and drivers of metastatic transformation (1315).

lncRNA-Low Expression in Tumor (lncRNA-LET), a recently identified lncRNA located at chromosome 15q24.1, was initially established to be downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma (16). Recently, it was demonstrated to be vital in the development and progression of gallbladder cancer (GBC) (17). However, the prognostic role of lncRNA-LET in cancer remains unknown and to date, to the best of our knowledge, no data were available regarding the lncRNA-LET expression level and biological role in human ESCC.

In the present study, the expression level of lncRNA-LET was demonstrated to be significantly decreased in ESCC tissues when compared with that of adjacent healthy tissues. Its correlation with clinicopathological factors in ESCC patients was also evaluated. Using ESCC cell lines, overexpression of lncRNA-LET by lentivirus-mediated gene transfection was investigated and observed to induce apoptosis, and inhibit invasion and proliferation. In addition, the present study verified that overexpression of lncRNA-LET induced the activation of p53. Thus, the current study indicates that lncRNA-LET has a significant role in ESCC development and may be considered as a potential prognostic factor for the prediction of clinical outcomes in ESCC patients.

Materials and methods

ESCC specimens

A total of 48 ESCC patients that underwent esophagectomy at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China) between 2012 and 2013 were enrolled in the present study. Tumor specimens and paired healthy esophageal tissue specimens, obtained from a site distant to the cancerous lesion, were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until total RNA was extracted. No radiotherapy or chemotherapy was conducted in these patients prior to surgery. The clinical data, including age, gender, pathological stage, grade, tumor location and lymph node metastasis were acquired from the medical records. Patients were classified according to criteria set by the World Health Organization (18) and were staged according to the tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) classification system, in which T refers to the size of the ESCC and whether it has invaded nearby tissue, N refers to whether or not regional lymph nodes are involved, and M refers to distant metastasis (19). The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Nanjing Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all of the patients.

Cell culture

Human ESCC cell lines, Eca109 and TE-1 were purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (both purchased from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Gibco: Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), within a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C. The duration of the culture was 7 days, and the medium was changed every 2 days.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis

Total RNA from the tissues and cells was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 1 ml Trizol was used to lyse cells (5×106 cells/well), then 0.2 ml of chloroform was added and the cells were incubated at room temperature for 3 min. After centrifugation at 12,000 × g at 4°C for 15 min, the RNA aqueous phase was transferred to a fresh tube. Then, 0.5 ml isopropanol per 1 ml TRIzol was added, and cells were incubated for 10 min at room temperature, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4 °C for 10 min. After washing the RNA pellet with 75% ethanol, the RNA was dissolved in 0.03 ml RNase-free water and incubated for 10 min at 55°C. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). The following thermal cycling protocol was used for reverse transcription: 37°C for 15 min for 3 cycles, followed by 85°C for 5 sec. The cDNA template was amplified by qPCR using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 5 µl 10-fold cDNA was mixed with 10 µl SYBR Premix Ex Taq and 4 nmol of primer in a volume of 20 µl. The following thermal cycle was followed: 30 sec at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec, and 60°C for 35 sec.

The relative levels of LET were determined by RT-qPCR using gene specific primers. Ornithine decarboxylase antizyme (OAZ-1) served as an internal control, and the lncRNA-LET values were normalized to OAZ-1. The RT-qPCR reactions and data collection were performed on a StepOne Plus™ Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The relative expression fold change of mRNAs was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (20). The primer sequences (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) were as follows: Forward, 5′-CGA GGA CAG AGC CGC CTT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GACAAACCCAGGCGAGATGA-3′ for OAZ-1; forward, 5′-GTTGTTGTTGCATTGGGGT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAGATGGAGAGTGGAGCCT-3′ for lncRNA-LET.

Plasmid and transfection

The sequence of LET was synthe-sized and subcloned into PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA (Genewiz, Inc., Suzhou, China), and the expression level of LET was detected by RT-qPCR.

Cells were grown on six-well plates to 70% confluence and then transfected with the PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA using 10 mg/ml polybrene (HanBio, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were harvested after 48 h for RT-qPCR and western blot analysis.

Cell migration and invasion assay

Cells (5×105 cells/well) were seeded in six-well plates and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. After 48 h, cell layers were wounded using the tip of 200 µl pipette. After washing cells 3 times with PBS, the serum-free RPIM-1640 medium was added to the plates and incubated within a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C for 48 h. Wound closure was observed under a light microscope (DFC500; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and measured using AxioVision version 4.7 software (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA).

For the invasion assays, transwell apparatus was used with a polycarbonate membrane (pore size, 8 µm) Boyden chamber insert (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) to measure cell motility. The transfected cells and wild-type cells were treated with trypsin/EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich) and washed once with serum-containing RPMI-1640 medium. A total of 1×105 cells in 0.2 ml serum-free RPMI-1640 medium were seeded on transwell apparatus. Each insert was precoated with 45 µg Matrigel (BD Biosciences; San Jose, CA, USA). Prior to examination, the chambers were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator, in culture medium with 10% FBS in the lower chambers. The cells on the upper surface were scraped using cotton buds and washed away with PBS, whereas the invaded cells on the lower surface were fixed in 100% precooling methanol (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, stained with 0.05% crystal violet (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min, then rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and subjected to microscopic inspection (DFC500; Leica). Finally, the values for invasion were obtained by counting three fields per membrane. Experiments were independently repeated in triplicate.

Cell proliferation assay

The 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU) detection kit (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, China) was used to evaluate cell proliferation. According to the manufacturer's instructions, cells were grown on six-well plates to 70% confluence, treated with 50 µM EdU for 2 h at 37°C and fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at room temperature. After cells were incubated with 2 mg/ml glycine (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 5 min at room temperature, they were treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and stained with 1X Apollo reaction cocktail (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd.) for 30 min at room temperature. After one wash with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS, 1X Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to incubate cells at room temperature for 30 min. Images were captured under a confocal laser scanning microscope (LEXT OLS3100; Olympus America, Inc., Center Valley, PA, USA). The assay was repeated in triplicate.

Flow cytometric analysis

The effect of LET treatment on cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. Cells transfected with PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA were plated in six-well plates for 48 h. The cells harvested and fixed in 70% ice-cold ethanol for 24 h were collected and analyzed for cell apoptosis using a flow cytometer (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences). In addition, the cells were harvested and stained with Annexin V/propidium idodide (PI), using the Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate apoptosis detection kit (KGI Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China).

Western blot analysis

Cells harvested from six-well culture plates were lysed using mammalian protein extraction reagent RIPA (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Roche Diagnostics). The lysates were then collected and subjected to ultrasonication (Q700 Sonicator; Misonix, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA) and centrifugation at 14m000 × g for 20 min. The supernatants were collected, and protein content was determined using a Bradford assay (Abcam). Protein extractions (50 µg) were separated by 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (90 min at 100 V; Abcam), then transferred to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (EMD Millipore) and incubated with specific antibodies. A GAPDH antibody served as a control. An enhanced chemiluminescence chromogenic substrate (SignalFire ECL Reagent; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) was used to visualize the bands with a chemiluminescent detection system (Pierce ECL Substrate Western Substrate; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and then exposed in a Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The intensity of the bands was quantified using Image J software (version 1.42; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The rabbit anti-human GAPDH monoclonal antibody (1:5,000; cat. no. 14C10) and rabbit anti-human p53 polyclonal antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. 9282) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.. The secondary goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polyclonal antibody (1:2,000; cat. no. ab6721) was purchased from Abcam. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical significance was evaluated by Student's t-test or a χ2 test as appropriate. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare the differences between patient groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

lncRNA-LET expression level is downregulated in ESCC specimens, and is correlated with pathological grade, tumor stage and lymph node metastasis

The expression levels of lncRNA-LET in 48 pairs of human ESCC and adjacent non-tumor tissue samples were examined by RT-qPCR and normalized to GAPDH. The lncRNA-LET expression level was identified to be significantly downregulated in tumor tissue samples when compared with non-tumor tissue samples. Furthermore, correlation analysis of lncRNA-LET expression levels with clinicopathological features of ESCC patients indicated that the expression level of lncRNA-LET was significantly correlated with the pathological grade (P=0.043), clinical stage (P=0.034) and lymph node metastasis (P=0.024); while there was no significant correlation between lncRNA-LET expression level and gender, age or tumor location (Table I). These results indicate that lncRNA-LET may be involved in the progression and metastasis of ESCC.

Table I

lncRNA-LET expression and clinicopathological characteristics in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Table I

lncRNA-LET expression and clinicopathological characteristics in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

CharacteristicCaseslncRNA-LET expression
P-value
LowHigh
Gender0.883
 Male271611
 Female2112  9
Age (years)0.915
 <60342014
 ≥6014  8  6
Histological grade0.043
 Well differentiateda15  510
 Moderately differentiatedb1610  6
 Poorly differentiatedc1713  4
T stage0.034
 T1-2d18  711
 T3-4e3021  9
Lymph node metastasis0.024
 Negative22  913
 Positive2619  7
Tumor location0.575
 Upper and middle 1/3311912
 Lower 1/317  9  8

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-mmr-13-04-3074'] } P<0.05 is considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

a Tumor was found in the mucosa, submucosa or superficial muscle;

b Tumor was in the deep muscular or outer layer; ctumor was identified in the esophageal lymph nodes;

d T1, tumor invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosa or submucosa; T2, tumor invades muscularis propria;

e T3, tumor invades adventitia; T4, tumor invades adjacent structure. lncRNA-LET, long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor.

lncRNA-LET inhibits ESCC cell migration and invasion in vitro

To investigate the biological role of lncRNA-LET in ESCC progression, Eca109 and TE-1 cells were transfected with PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET. The transfection efficiency was validated using RT-qPCR (Fig. 1). Using a wound healing assay, the relative migrating distance of cells was identified to be significantly reduced in wild-type ESCC cells as compared with the PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET-inf ected cells (Fig. 2). In addition, a Matrigel-coated transwell assay demonstrated that the numbers of PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV4 0pA-LET-infected Eca109 (104 cells) and TE-1 (208 cells) cells that invaded through the Matrigel were significantly less than those of the wild-type Eca109 (200 cells) and TE-1 (509 cells) cells (P<0.05; Fig. 3). These results indicate that lncRNA-LET suppresses the invasive phenotype of ESCC cells in vitro.

lncRNA-LET inhibits ESCC cell proliferation in vitro

To determine whether LET overexpression affected ESCC growth, the EdU assay was performed on ESCC cells infected with PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET. The percentages of EdU-positive cells (cells in the S phase of the cell cycle) in the PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET-infected groups were not identified to be significantly lower than those of the wild-type groups (P>0.05; Fig. 4).

lncRNA-LET inhibits ESCC cell proliferation via inducing apoptosis

To evaluate the effect of lncRNA-LET on tumor cell apoptosis, Eca109 and TE-1 cells were employed as the model system. It was hypothesized that lncRNA-LET overexpression induced cell apoptosis in ESCC cells. The apoptotic rate of Eca109 and TE-1 cells transfected with PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET was identified to be significantly increased when compared with those of the wild-type ESCC cells (Fig. 5). This indicates that upregulation of LET induces ESCC cell apoptosis in vitro.

lncRNA-LET induces activation of the p53 protein

Recent studies have demonstrated that numerous lncRNAs may participate in the regulation of cell growth by modulating the p53 signaling pathway (2124). To further investigate whether, and the mechanism by which, LET induces ESCC cell growth arrest and apoptosis, the protein level of p53 was examined following transfection of PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET in wild-type ESCC cells. The results of western blot analysis indicated that the expression level of p53 was significantly increased in ESCC cells transfected with PLL3.7-EF-1a-SV40pA-LET when compared with that of wild-type ESCC cells (Fig. 6). These data indicate that LET functions as a tumor suppressor gene by activating p53 in ESCC cells.

Discussion

Recent studies have revealed that lncRNAs participate in a multitude of biological processes, such as chromatin modification, transcription and post-transcriptional processing (10,12,25,26). In addition, previous studies have demonstrated that dysregu-lation of lncRNAs may also affect epigenetic information and provide a cellular growth advantage, resulting in a wide range of diseases, particularly in progressive and uncontrolled tumor growth (27,28). HOX transcript antisense RNA, a well known lncRNA involved in tumor pathogenesis, has been consistently upregulated and identified as a strong prognosis marker of patient outcomes in various types of human cancer (14,28-30). H19, encoded by an imprinted gene, has been verified to be upregulated in tumors and to possess oncogenic properties (31-33). Maternally expressed gene 3 (MEG3) is located at chromosome 14q32, and a loss of MEG3 expression has been observed in a number of primary human tumors, including glioma, hepatocellular cancers, non-small cell lung cancer, and gastric cancer (34-37). Although evidence of the carcinogenicity of these lncRNAs is strong, the molecular mechanism regarding tumor development and the promotion of metastasis is not fully understood.

lncRNA-LET, as a novel lncRNA molecule, was initially well known for its downregulation in primary hepatocellular carcinoma, wherein lncRNA-LET suppresses cancer invasiveness and metastasis (16). Furthermore, downregulation of lncRNA was examined in squamous-cell lung carcinoma and colon carcinoma tissues and compared with their paired healthy primary tissues (16). In addition, there were findings indicating that lncRNA-LET may represent a prognostic marker and potential therapeutic target for GBC (17). Due to the observation that lncRNA-LET is involved with dysregulation during cancer progression, the biological role of lncRNA-LET in ESCC progression was investigated in the present study and its clinical significance was analyzed.

The present study indicated that the expression level of lncRNA-LET was downregulated in ESCC tissue samples when compared with adjacent healthy tissue samples. Furthermore, the low expression level of lncRNA-LET in ESCC tissue samples was demonstrated to be closely associated with clinicopathological features. Low expression levels of lncRNA-LET were correlated with poorly differentiated histology, higher tumor grade and positive nodal status. Similarly, overexpression of lncRNA-LET expression was identified to inhibit the migration and invasion of ESCC cells, and also significantly increased the response of ESCC cells to cell apoptosis induction.

p53, as a master regulator for gene expression, directly or indirectly regulates the expression of numerous target genes, which leads to the suppression of tumor development and growth by blocking cell proliferation or by activating cell death programs (36,38). The present study examined whether lncRNA-LET affects the expression level of p53 protein to further investigate the underlying mechanisms by which lncRNA-LET induced cell growth arrest and apoptosis. Overexpression of lncRNA-LET was identified to significantly increase the level of p53 protein when compared with that of the controls.

In conclusion, the loss of lncRNA-LET expression was demonstrated to be a common occurrence underlying EC, suggesting that lncRNA-LET may perform a key functional role in suppressing the invasive and metastatic behavior of ESCC cells. These findings indicate that lncRNA-LET may function as a tumor suppressor and its deficiency or decreased expression may contribute to ESCC development. Furthermore, lncRNA-LET may be exploited in a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of EC, and potentially be useful as a novel prognostic marker for EC.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 81170158) and the science and technology project of Jiangsu Provincial Health Department (grant no. H200821).

References

1 

Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E and Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 61:69–90. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Enzinger PC and Mayer RJ: Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 349:2241–2252. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Law S and Wong J: Current management of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 9:291–310. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Hiyama T, Yoshihara M, Tanaka S and Chayama K: Genetic polymorphisms and esophageal cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 121:1643–1658. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Li T, Lu ZM, Chen KN, Guo M, Xing HP, Mei Q, Yang HH, Lechner JF and Ke Y: Human papillomavirus type 16 is an important infectious factor in the high incidence of esophageal cancer in Anyang area of China. Carcinogenesis. 22:929–934. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pohl H and Welch HG: The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 97:142–146. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Lv XB, Lian GY, Wang HR, Song E, Yao H and Wang MH: Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR is a prognostic marker for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression and survival. PLoS One. 8:e635162013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Roder JD, Busch R, Stein HJ, Fink U and Siewert JR: Ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes as a predictor of survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. Br J Surg. 81:410–413. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Montesano R, Hollstein M and Hainaut P: Genetic alterations in esophageal cancer and their relevance to etiology and pathogenesis: A review. Int J Cancer. 69:225–235. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Wilusz JE, Sunwoo H and Spector DL: Long noncoding RNAs: Functional surprises from the RNA world. Genes Dev. 23:1494–1504. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Gutschner T and Diederichs S: The hallmarks of cancer: A long non-coding RNA point of view. RNA Biol. 9:703–719. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Mercer TR, Dinger ME and Mattick JS: Long non-coding RNAs: Insights into functions. Nat Rev Genet. 10:155–159. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Tripathi V, Shen Z, Chakraborty A, Giri S, Freier SM, Wu X, Zhang Y, Gorospe M, Prasanth SG, Lal A and Prasanth KV: Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 controls cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of oncogenic transcription factor B-MYB. PLoS Genet. 9:e10033682013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Kogo R, Shimamura T, Mimori K, Kawahara K, Imoto S, Sudo T, Tanaka F, Shibata K, Suzuki A, Komune S, et al: Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR regulates polycomb-dependent chromatin modification and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 71:6320–6326. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Aguilo F, Zhou MM and Walsh MJ: Long noncoding RNA, polycomb, and the ghosts haunting INK4b-ARF-INK4a expression. Cancer Res. 71:5365–5369. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Yang F, Huo XS, Yuan SX, Zhang L, Zhou WP, Wang F and Sun SH: Repression of the long noncoding RNA-LET by histone deacetylase 3 contributes to hypoxia-mediated metastasis. Mol Cell. 49:1083–1096. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Ma MZ, Kong X, Weng MZ, Zhang MD, Qin YY, Gong W, Zhang WJ and Quan ZW: Long non-coding RNA-LET is a positive prognostic factor and exhibits tumor-suppressive activity in gallbladder cancer. Mol Carcinog. 54:1397–1406. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

World Health Organization: Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 894:i–xii. 1–253. 2000.

19 

Takeno S, Noguchi T, Takahashi Y, Fumoto S, Shibata T and Kawahara K: Assessment of clinical outcome in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using TNM classification score and molecular biological classification. Ann Surg Oncol. 14:1431–1438. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Huarte M, Guttman M, Feldser D, Garber M, Koziol MJ, Kenzelmann-Broz D, Khalil AM, Zuk O, Amit I, Rabani M, et al: A large intergenic noncoding RNA induced by p53 mediates global gene repression in the p53 response. Cell. 142:409–419. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Zhang A, Xu M and Mo YY: Role of the IncRNA-p53 regulatory network in cancer. J Mol Cell Biol. 6:181–191. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Liu Q, Huang JG, Zhou N, Zhang Z, Zhang A, Lu Z, Wu F and Mo YY: LncRNA loc285194 is a p53-regulated tumor suppressor. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:4976–4987. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Ma XY, Wang JH, Wang JL, Ma CX, Wang XC and Liu FS: Malat1 as an evolutionarily conserved IncRNA, plays a positive role in regulating proliferation and maintaining undifferentiated status of early-stage hematopoietic cells. BMC Genomics. 16:6762015. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Kung JT, Colognori D and Lee JT: Long noncoding RNAs: Past, present and future. Genetics. 193:651–669. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Cheetham SW, Gruhl F, Mattick JS and Dinger ME: Long noncoding RNAs and the genetics of cancer. Br J Cancer. 108:2419–2425. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kotake Y, Nakagawa T, Kitagawa K, Suzuki S, Liu N, Kitagawa M and Xiong Y: Long non-coding RNA ANRIL is required for the PRC2 recruitment to and silencing of p15 (INK4B) tumor suppressor gene. Oncogene. 30:1956–1962. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Geng YJ, Xie SL, Li Q, Ma J and Wang GY: Large intervening non-coding RNA HOTAIR is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression. J Int Med Res. 39:2119–2128. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, et al: Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 464:1071–1076. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Niinuma T, Suzuki H, Nojima M, Nosho K, Yamamoto H, Takamaru H, Yamamoto E, Maruyama R, Nobuoka T, Miyazaki Y, et al: Upregulation of miR-196a and HOTAIR drive malignant character in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 72:1126–1136. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Matouk IJ, DeGroot N, Mezan S, Ayesh S, Abulail R, Hochberg A and Galun E: The H19 non-coding RNA is essential for human tumor growth. PLoS One. 2:e8452007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Berteaux N, Lottin S, Monté D, Pinte S, Quatannens B, Coll J, Hondermarck H, Curgy JJ, Dugimont T and Adriaenssens E: H19 mRNA-like noncoding RNA promotes breast cancer cell proliferation through positive control by E2F1. J Biol Chem. 280:29625–29636. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Barsyte-Lovejoy D, Lau SK, Boutros PC, Khosravi F, Jurisica I, Andrulis IL, Tsao MS and Penn LZ: The c-Myc oncogene directly induces the H19 noncoding RNA by allele-specific binding to potentiate tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 66:5330–5337. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Wang P, Ren Z and Sun P: Overexpression of the long non-coding RNA MEG3 impairs in vitro glioma cell proliferation. J Cell Biochem. 113:1868–1874. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Anwar SL, Krech T, Hasemeier B, Schipper E, Schweitzer N, Vogel A, Kreipe H and Lehmann U: Loss of imprinting and allelic switching at the DLK1-MEG3 locus in human hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 7. pp. e494622012, View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Lu KH, Li W, Liu XH, Sun M, Zhang ML, Wu WQ, Xie WP and Hou YY: Long non-coding RNA MEG3 inhibits NSCLC cells proliferation and induces apoptosis by affecting p53 expression. BMC Cancer. 13:4612013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Sun M, Xia R, Jin F, Xu T, Liu Z, De W and Liu X: Downregulated long noncoding RNA MEG3 is associated with poor prognosis and promotes cell proliferation in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 35:1065–1073. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Vousden KH and Prives C: Blinded by the Light: The growing complexity of p53. Cell. 137:413–431. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2016
Volume 13 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang PL, Liu B, Xia Y, Pan CF, Ma T and Chen YJ: Long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor inhibits the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53 expression. Mol Med Rep 13: 3074-3082, 2016.
APA
Wang, P., Liu, B., Xia, Y., Pan, C., Ma, T., & Chen, Y. (2016). Long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor inhibits the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53 expression. Molecular Medicine Reports, 13, 3074-3082. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4913
MLA
Wang, P., Liu, B., Xia, Y., Pan, C., Ma, T., Chen, Y."Long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor inhibits the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53 expression". Molecular Medicine Reports 13.4 (2016): 3074-3082.
Chicago
Wang, P., Liu, B., Xia, Y., Pan, C., Ma, T., Chen, Y."Long non-coding RNA-Low Expression in Tumor inhibits the invasion and metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by regulating p53 expression". Molecular Medicine Reports 13, no. 4 (2016): 3074-3082. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.4913