Effects of tacrolimus on morphology, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from gingiva tissue
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 6, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5217
- Pages: 69-76
-
Copyright: © Ha et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent progenitor cells that have the capacity for self-renewal and differentiation into osteocytes, adipocytes and other cells (1). MSCs have been used in preclinical models for tissue engineering of bone, cartilage, muscle, marrow stroma, tendon, fat and other connective tissues (2–4). In addition, MSCs secrete a broad spectrum of bioactive macromolecules that are immunomodulatory and serve to structure regenerative microenvironments in fields of tissue injury (5). Human mesenchymal stem cells have previously been isolated and characterized from the gingiva, and gingiva-derived stem cells have been applied for tissue engineering purposes (6). Moreover, stem cells may be obtained intraorally, and gingiva is a readily accessible tissue source with a relatively high quantity of obtainable tissue (7).
Tacrolimus is a 23-member macrolide lactone (molecular weight, 803.5 Da) with potent immunosuppressive activity that is effective in the prophylaxis of organ rejection following liver, heart, kidney and small bowel transplantation (8). Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window (9) and it is important to choose the right dose (10). Clinically, the doses of tacrolimus administered following kidney, heart and liver transplantation are 0.15–0.3, 0.05–0.075 and 0.10–0.2 mg/kg/day, respectively (11–14). In addition, whole blood tacrolimus concentrations were observed to be 10–15 ng/ml during months 1–3 and 5–12 ng/ml during months 4–12 with the initial tacrolimus dose of 0.15–0.2 mg/kg/day (14,15).
Tacrolimus has been shown to exert a variety of actions on bone metabolism (16). It was reported that tacrolimus causes bone loss when administered systemically (17,18). However, other studies have shown that tacrolimus promotes osteogenic differentiation (19,20). Conversely, another study demonstrated that tacrolimus was not associated with osteogenic differentiation of human heart-derived MSCs (21).
Limited information is currently available regarding the effects of tacrolimus on dental tissue, and none is available on its effects on human mesenchymal stem cells derived from the gingiva. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a broad range of concentrations of tacrolimus on the morphology and viability of human stem cells derived from the gingiva.
Materials and methods
Isolation and culture of stem cells derived from the gingiva
Healthy gingival tissue samples were collected from healthy patients (mean age, 51.8±18.1 years; 2 male and 2 female) and this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea (Seoul, Korea; approval no. KC11SISI0348); informed consent was obtained from all patients. The resected gingival tissues were immediately placed in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Welgene Inc., Daegu, Korea) with 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 4°C. The gingival tissue was de-epithelialized, minced into 1–2 mm2 fragments, and digested in 0.2 µm filtered α-Minumum Essential Medium (MEM; HyClone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK) with collagenase IV (Sigma-Aldrich). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. After 24 h, the non-adherent cells were washed with PBS, and adherent cell were administered fresh medium and replaced every 2–3 days. A previous report demonstrated that these cells showed colony-forming abilities, plastic adherence, and multilineage differentiation (osteogenic, adipogenic, chondrogenic) potency (22). The cells expressed CD44, CD73, CD90, and CD105, but did not express CD14, CD45, CD34, and CD19 in flow cytometry (22).
Evaluation of cellular morphology
The cells were plated at a density of 2.0×103 cells/well in 96-well plates. The cells were incubated in α-MEM containing 15% fetal bovine serum (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin in the presence of tacrolimus at final concentrations ranging of 0 (control), 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µg/ml. Tacrolimus was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) and filter-sterilized. Equal quantities of DMSO were added to each culture sample to offset the influence of this dissolving vehicle. The morphology of the cells was viewed under an inverted microscope (Leica DM IRM, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) on days 1, 3, 5 and 7. The images were saved as JPEGs.
Determination of cell viability
The cell viability analysis was performed on days 1, 3, 5 and 7. 2-(2-methoxy-4-nitrophe nyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST-8 from Cell Counting kit-8; Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan) was added to the culture and the cells were incubated for 3 h at 37°C. Viable cells were identified using the CCK-8 assay, which relies on the ability of mitochondrial dehydrogenases to oxidize WST-8 to a formazan product. The spectrophotometric absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The tests were performed in triplicate.
Alizarin Red S staining
Cell cultures obtained on days 5 and 7 were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 70% ethanol and rinsed twice with deionized water. Cultures were stained with Alizarin Red S (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and evaluated with a microscope (Leica DM IRB; Leica Microsystems). To remove non-specifically bound stain, cultures were washed three times with deionized water and once with PBS for 15 min at ambient temperature. Bound dye was solubilized in 10 mM sodium phosphate containing 10% cetylpyridinium chloride (Sigma-Aldrich) and quantified spectrophotometrically at 560 nm (PowerWave XS2; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Statistical analysis
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of the experiments. A one-way analysis of variance with post-hoc test was performed to determine the differences between the groups using a commercially available program (SPSS 12 for Windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Evaluation of cell morphology
The control group showed normal fibroblast morphology on day 1 (Fig. 1). The shapes of the cells treated with 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg/ml tacrolimus were similar to those of the control group. However, the 100 µg/ml group was markedly different when compared with the control group. The shapes of the cells in the 100 µg/ml group were rounder, and fewer cells were present. The morphology of the cells on day 3 is shown in Fig. 2. An increased number of cells were observed in each group and the shapes of the cells in the tested groups were similar to those in the control group. The results for cells on days 5 and 7 are shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. Noticeable differences were observed in the 100 µg/ml group.
Cellular viability
The CCK-8 results demonstrated cellular viability on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 are shown in Fig. 5. All groups except the 10 and 100 µg/ml group showed relatively increased cell proliferation over time. The cultures grown in the presence of tacrolimus at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg/ml did not show any statistically significant differences compared with the control at days 1, 3 and 5 using the CCK-8 assays (P>0.05). However, growth in the presence of tacrolimus at a concentration of 100 µg/ml resulted in decreases in the CCK-8 values at days 3, 5 and 7 (P<0.05).
Mineralization assay
Mineralized extracellular deposits were minimally observed after Alizarin Red S staining on day 5 (Fig. 6). Increased mineralized deposits were noted on day 7 (Fig. 7). The quantitative results regarding bound dye on days 5 and 7 are shown in Fig. 8. The cultures grown in the presence of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/ml tacrolimus exhibited increased mineralized deposits compared with the control on day 5. The relative values of the mineralization at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/ml of tacrolimus were 110.9±10.7%, 102.1±8.4%, 106.5±8.0%, and 111.8±6.7%, respectively when the result of the control group on day 5 was considered to be 100% (100.0±9.1%). A significant decrease in mineralization was observed in the 100 µg/ml group on day 5 in comparison with the control group (P<0.05). The results for day 7 showed that treatment with tacrolimus at concentrations 0.001–1 µg/ml led to increase mineralized deposits compared with the control group. The relative value of the mineralization at 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1 µg/ml of tacrolimus were 118.0±11.2, 123.6±12.3, 118.3±4.5 and 104.4±5.9%, respectively, when the result of the control group on day 7 was considered 100% (100.0±5.4%). A statistically significant decrease was observed in the 100 µg/ml group on day 7 in comparison with the control group (P<0.05).
Discussion
Immunosuppressants have provided great improvement in organ transplantation by suppressing the rejection of allografts; this has increased the survival rate of organ transplant patients (23). Tacrolimus (FK506) is a widely-used, well-known immunosuppressant used following kidney or heart transplantation, and has been recognized as effective in promoting the growth of bone grafts (24). The present study was performed in order to investigate the effects of tacrolimus on proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro.
This study determined the effects of tacrolimus on the morphology, cell viability and mineralization following treatment with 0.001–100 µg/ml tacrolimus. The cells exposed to tacrolimus at concentrations of 0.001–10 µg/ml exhibited a similar fibroblastic spindle shape. Short-term application of tacrolimus did not result in morphologic changes at final concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 10 µg/ml.
Cellular viability was determined using a CCK-8 assay, which is based on mitochondrial enzyme reduction of the WST-8 and spectrophotometric quantification of the water-soluble formazan dye generated (25). This study showed that tacrolimus at the tested concentrations was not identified to exhibit a significant effect on the viability of stem cells derived from the gingiva at final concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 10 µg/ml. However, tacrolimus at 100 µg/ml decreased cell viability on days 3, 5 and 7.
Osteogenic differentiation can be evaluated by Alizarin red S staining (26). The presence of calcium in cellular deposits was confirmed by Alizarin Red S staining with cetylpyridinium chloride for quantification (27). Tacrolimus at 0.001, 0.01 and 1 µg/ml resulted in the highest degree of mineralized nodule formation on day 7. A previous study showed that tacrolimus at 0.04 and 0.4 µg/ml enhanced osteoblastic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells (20). Co-stimulation with tacrolimus (1.0 µg/ml) and bone morphogenetic protein-9 (100 ng/ml) induced marked osteoblastic differentiation of dedifferentiated fat cells, which were isolated from mature adipocytes using the ceiling culture method and exhibit similar characteristics to mesenchymal stem cells (28). In the present study, the highest differentiation was achieved at 0.01 µg/ml; however, a previous study demonstrated that remarkable osteoblast differentiation was achieved at 1.0 µg/ml (20). The differences may be explained by the different type and stage of the cells, the culturing time period and the culture system (29,30).
A previous study demonstrated that tacrolimus promoted the early stage of osteoinduction (24). The mechanism underlying osteogenic differentiation has not yet been fully elucidated; however, it has been suggested that the osteogenic effect of tacrolimus may involve bone morphogenetic protein signaling (16). A previous report suggested that tacrolimus promoted osteogenic differentiation by activating BMP receptors through interacting with FK506-binding protein 12 (16). Tacrolimus enhanced the positive effects of bone morphogenetic proteins on alikaline phosphatase activity and osteocalcin in mRNA (19). The effects of the combination treatment with bone morphogenetic protein and tacrolimus acted in a dose- and time-dependent manner (19).
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that treatment with tacrolimus at the tested concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 10 µg/ml did not result in significant changes in the viability of stem cells derived from gingiva, but increased osteogenic differentiation of the stem cells. Further studies related to this phenomenon in an in vivo model are necessary in order to ascertain greater understanding.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the 2015 Yeungnam University, Basic Science Research Program (grant nos. 2014R1A1A1002536 and 2015R1A2A2A04005616) and the Medical Research Center Program (grant no. 2015R1A5A2009124) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.
References
Beyer Nardi N and da Silva Meirelles L: Mesenchymal stem cells: Isolation, in vitro expansion and characterization. Handb Exp Pharmacol:. 249–282. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen WC, Péault B and Huard J: Regenerative translation of human blood-vessel-derived MSC precursors. Stem Cells Int. 2015:3751872015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng S, Huang R, Wang J, Zhang S, Chen Z, Wu S, Jiang Y, Peng Q, Cai X and Lin Y: Miscellaneous animal models accelerate the application of mesenchymal stem cells for cartilage regeneration. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 9:223–233. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Landa-Solís C, Granados-Montiel J, Olivos-Meza A, Ortega-Sánchez C, Cruz-Lemini M, Hernández-Flores C, Chang-González ME, García RG, Olivos-Díaz B, Velasquillo-Martínez MC, et al: Cryopreserved CD90+ cells obtained from mobilized peripheral blood in sheep: a new source of mesenchymal stem cells for preclinical applications. Cell Tissue Bank. July 29–2015.Epub ahead of print. | |
Caplan AI: Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine. J Cell Physiol. 213:341–347. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee SI, Yeo SI, Kim BB, Ko Y and Park JB: Formation of size-controllable spheroids using gingiva-derived stem cells and concave microwells: Morphology and viability tests. Biomed Rep. 4:97–101. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jeong SH, Lee JE, Kim BB, Ko Y and Park JB: Evaluation of the effects of Cimicifugae Rhizoma on the morphology and viability of mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Ther Med. 10:629–634. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tamura S, Ohike A, Ibuki R, Amidon GL and Yamashita S: Tacrolimus is a class II low-solubility high-permeability drug: The effect of P-glycoprotein efflux on regional permeability of tacrolimus in rats. J Pharm Sci. 91:719–729. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scholten EM, Cremers SC, Schoemaker RC, Rowshani AT, van Kan EJ, den Hartigh J, Paul LC and de Fijter JW: AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus prevents progressive systemic overexposure in renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 67:2440–2447. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Felipe CR, Garcia C, Moreira S, Olsen N, Silva HT and Pestana OM: Choosing the right dose of new immunossuppressive drugs for new populations: Importance of pharmacokinetic studies. Transplant Proc. 33:1095–1096. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Hooff JP, Boots JM, van Duijnhoven EM and Christiaans MH: Dosing and management guidelines for tacrolimus in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc. 31:54S–57S. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taylor DO, Barr ML, Radovancevic B, Renlund DG, Mentzer RM Jr, Smart FW, Tolman DE, Frazier OH, Young JB and VanVeldhuisen P: A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: Decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus. J Heart Lung Transplant. 18:336–345. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Busuttil RW, Klintmalm GB, Lake JR, Miller CM and Porayko M: General guidelines for the use of tacrolimus in adult liver transplant patients. Transplantation. 61:845–847. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Staatz CE and Tett SE: Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 43:623–653. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Laskow DA, Neylan JF III, Shapiro RS, Pirsch JD, Vergne-Marini PJ and Tomlanovich SJ: The role of tacrolimus in adult kidney transplantation: A review. Clin Transplant. 12:489–503. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kugimiya F, Yano F, Ohba S, Igawa K, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H and Chung UI: Mechanism of osteogenic induction by FK506 via BMP/Smad pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 338:872–879. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park KM, Hay JE, Lee SG, Lee YJ, Wiesner RH, Porayko MK and Krom RA: Bone loss after orthotopic liver transplantation: FK 506 versus cyclosporine. Transplant Proc. 28:1738–1740. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Stempfle HU, Werner C, Echtler S, Assum T, Meiser B, Angermann CE, Theisen K and Gärtner R: Rapid trabecular bone loss after cardiac transplantation using FK506 (tacrolimus)-based immunosuppression. Transplant Proc. 30:1132–1133. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang L, Ebara S, Kawasaki S, Wakabayashi S, Nikaido T and Takaoka K: FK506 enhanced osteoblastic differentiation in mesenchymal cells. Cell Biol Int. 26:75–84. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Byun YK, Kim KH, Kim SH, Kim YS, Koo KT, Kim TI, Seol YJ, Ku Y, Rhyu IC and Lee YM: Effects of immunosuppressants, FK506 and cyclosporin A, on the osteogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 42:73–80. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoogduijn MJ, Crop MJ, Korevaar SS, Peeters AM, Eijken M, Maat LP, Balk AH, Weimar W and Baan CC: Susceptibility of human mesenchymal stem cells to tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid and rapamycin. Transplantation. 86:1283–1291. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin SH, Lee JE, Yun JH, Kim I, Ko Y and Park JB: Isolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells from gingival connective tissue. J Periodontal Res. 50:461–467. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lechler RI, Sykes M, Thomson AW and Turka LA: Organ transplantation - how much of the promise has been realized? Nat Med. 11:605–613. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaihara S, Bessho K, Okubo Y, Sonobe J, Kusumoto K, Ogawa Y and Iizuka T: Effect of FK506 on osteoinduction by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Life Sci. 72:247–256. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Utheim TP, Raeder S, Utheim ØA, Cai Y, Roald B, Drolsum L, Lyberg T and Nicolaissen B: A novel method for preserving cultured limbal epithelial cells. Br J Ophthalmol. 91:797–800. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bang SM, Moon HJ, Kwon YD, Yoo JY, Pae A and Kwon IK: Osteoblastic and osteoclastic differentiation on SLA and hydrophilic modified SLA titanium surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 25:831–837. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wang B, Bi M, Zhu Z, Wu L and Wang J: Effects of the antihypertensive drug benidipine on osteoblast function in vitro. Exp Ther Med. 7:649–653. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nakamura T, Shinohara Y, Momozaki S, Yoshimoto T and Noguchi K: Co-stimulation with bone morphogenetic protein-9 and FK506 induces remarkable osteoblastic differentiation in rat dedifferentiated fat cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 440:289–294. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Quarles LD, Yohay DA, Lever LW, Caton R and Wenstrup RJ: Distinct proliferative and differentiated stages of murine MC3T3-E1 cells in culture: An in vitro model of osteoblast development. J Bone Miner Res. 7:683–692. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JB, Zhang H, Lin CY, Chung CP, Byun Y, Park YS and Yang VC: Simvastatin maintains osteoblastic viability while promoting differentiation by partially regulating the expressions of estrogen receptors α. J Surg Res. 174:278–283. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar |