Semaphorin 3A-modified adipose-derived stem cell sheet may improve osseointegration in a type 2 diabetes mellitus rat model
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 28, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5568
- Pages: 2449-2456
-
Copyright: © Fang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Titanium (Ti) implants are considered to be the optimal material for teeth replacements and orthopedic devices (1). However, osseointegration of Ti implants remain a challenge in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. With economic growth and an aging population, the T2DM patient population is increasing rapidly; therefore, there is a high demand for improving osseointegration in T2DM.
Improvement of osseointegration in patients with T2DM has been widely investigated. A previous study reported that the systematic administration of vitamin D3 and insulin improves Ti osseointegration in diabetes mellitus rats (2). Local delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor may also enhance the osseointegration of implants (3). However, the drug delivery method (systematic or local) appears unimportant, as certain drugs work solely in a non-specific manner around the Ti implant, lack targeted intervention and may result in unknown side effects. It is considered that hyperglycemia in T2DM has a negative influence on the differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and thus results in deficiencies of these cells during osseointegration (4,5). The introduction of exogenous healthy stem cells into the implant cavity may alleviate this problem. A stem cell sheet consists of numerous cells and bioactive growth factors. In addition, the stem cell sheet is semi-differentiated in order to allow for more effective osseointegration by providing a pre-organized microenvironment for bone formation (6,7). A previous study used BMSCs for this purpose and prepared cell-implant complexes to improve osseointegration in a T2DM model (6). However, the collection of BMSCs requires complex procedures; therefore, the possible application of this treatment is limited by the ability to source BMSCs (8,9). Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) are considered as an attractive candidate to replace BMSCs in various areas, including bone tissue regeneration due to their abundant availability and clear expansion capacity (10–13). Therefore, it is possible that an ASCs sheet-wrapped Ti implant may promote osseointegration in a T2DM model. Previous studies have determined that the bone matrix mineralization and calcium deposition abilities of ASCs are weaker compared with BMSCs (14,15). Therefore, it is necessary to further investigate the osteogenic ability of ASCs prior to implantation.
Bone homeostasis requires a balance between bone formation and resorption, which is crucial for bone metabolism (16). Certain drugs are able to promote bone formation (17), however, they may also activate bone resorption (18) as a result of dysfunctional bone homeostasis. Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) was the first member to be identified from the large semaphorin family and has been determined to be a novel osteoprotective protein (19,20). This protein is able to affect osteogenic promotion and bone resorption inhibition (19). Therefore, Sema3A may be effective for use in ASC modification.
The present study assessed the osteogenic capacity of ASCs in vitro by Sema3A modification. The constructed ASC sheet was modified by Sema3A prior to being wrapped around a Ti implant and inserted into a T2DM rat to evaluate the osseointegration under T2DM conditions.
Materials and methods
Cell isolation and culture
A total of 20 adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (age, 6–8 weeks; weight, 150–200 g) were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of Fourth Military Medical University (FMMU; Xi'an, China). They were maintained under a 12-h light/dark cycle with access to a normal diet, at 18–26°C and a humidity of 30–70%. The animal experiment procedures were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the FMMU. Primary rat ASCs were isolated as previously described (21). Briefly, the subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested from the inguinal fat pad and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The tissue was finely minced into pieces and digested at 37°C with 0.1% type I collagenase (MP Biomedicals LLC, Santa Ana, CA, USA) for 40 min. The digestion was terminated by growth medium (GM) composed of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, Ham's F12 nutrient mixture, 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (all from Hyclone; GE Healthcare, Logan, UT, USA). The digested product was centrifuged at 120 × g for 5 min at room temperature and the pellet was resuspended in GM for culturing. Cells at passage 3–6 were used for the further investigation. In order to perform the osteogenic differentiation in the presence of Sema3A, conditioned medium (CM) was prepared by supplementing 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, 10 nM dexamethasone (all from MP Biomedicals LLC) and different concentrations (0, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 μg/ml) of Sema3A (PeproTech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) into the GM. The treatment groups were then named ASCs, ASCs-0.25, ASCs-0.5 and ASCs-1.0.
Morphological observations
The ASCs were seeded onto coverslips (5×5 mm) at a density of 2.0×104 cells/well in a 24-well plate and incubated for 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and dehydrated gradually in ethanol (from 30–100%). The sample was further dried under critical point conditions and sputter coated with platinum. Observations were then performed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM; S-4800; Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan; magnification, ×200).
Cell proliferation analysis
The ASCs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1.0×104 cells/well. Cell viability was continuously monitored each day using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; MP Biomedicals LLC) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, 10 μl CCK-8 solution was gently mixed with phenol red-free medium in each well and incubated for 3 h at 37°C. The medium was then transferred into a new 96-well plate, and the absorbance was detected at 450 nm by a microplate reader (Epoch; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
The ASCs were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 2.0×104 cells/well. Subsequent to expansion for 3 days in GM, the cells were induced with CM. Following 3 and 7 day induction periods, total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 1 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). Osteogenesis-associated genes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and collagen type I α1 (COL1A1), were amplified using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq II RT-PCR kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). A 10 μl system containing 5μl SYBR Premix, 1 μl forward primer, 1 μl reverse primer and 3 μl cDNA was used. The thermocycling conditions were 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The PCR was analyzed using CFX Manager software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The primers used are presented in Table I and were as previously described (22). The mRNA expression was calculated based on the Cq value (23), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as the endogenous reference.
Osteogenesis staining
ALP production, collagen secretion and extracellular matrix (ECM) mineralization were visualized using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate (BCIP)/nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) alkaline phosphatase, Sirius red and Alizarin red S (all from Leagene Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) staining. Following induction in CM for 7, 14 and 21 days, the cells were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Next, the specimens were stained by BCIP/NBT alkaline phosphatase solution, Sirius red and Alizarin red according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cells were rinsed with PBS in order to remove any excess dye and images were captured using a stereo microscope (Leica Microsystems, Inc., Buffalo Grove, IL, USA; magnification, ×20).
Cell sheet construction and surgical implantation
The construction of the ASC sheets was performed as previously described (24). Briefly, cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 3.0×105 cells/well and allowed to expand for 24 h to reach 100% confluence. Following in vitro observation, it was determined that Sema3A at the highest concentration (1.0 μg/ml) and ascorbic acid (50 μg/ml) should be added into the GM to perform the cell sheet engineering. The control group was induced without Sema3A. The cell sheet was formulated after 1 week and was allowed to shrink instantly subsequent to detachment of the forceps. The sheet wrapped closely around the implant (L=5 mm; D=1.5 mm; provided by Northwest Institute for Nonferrous Metal Research, Xi'an, China).
A high-fat diet and a low-dose (30 mg/kg) streptozotocin (MP Biomedicals LLC) intraperitoneal injection was administered to induce T2DM as described previously (6). Animals were anesthetized by an intra-abdominal injection of a pentobarbital sodium solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at a dose of 50 mg/kg. Following shaving and sterilization, the implant cavity (D=1.8 mm) was prepared at approximately 7 mm below the knee joint using a twist drill. Subsequently, the cell sheet-imbedded implant was inserted into the cavity. A post-operative antibiotic treatment, based on body weight, was injected once a day for seven days.
Micro-computed tomography (CT) scanning and histological evaluation
The healing process was 4–8 weeks, then the rats were subsequently sacrificed by intraperitoneal injection of overdose (>100 mg/kg) of pentobarbital sodium solution and the specimens were scanned by micro-CT (scanning resolution, 50 μm) in order to determine alterations in the peri-implant tissue. The region of interest (ROI), including the trabecular compartment surrounding the implant, was defined as a ring with a radius of 1.25 mm from the implant surface. In the three-dimensional level, the Hounsfield unit of this newly formed bone area was determined using the Inveon Research Workplace software package, version 2.2.0 (Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). The trabecular thickness, trabecular number and bone volume ratio were determined and recorded. The tibia tissue was isolated and fixed in 10% formalin (pH=6.7) at 4°C. The samples were dehydrated in a graded ascending series of ethanol solutions (70–100%), infiltrated and embedded in methyl methacrylate. Serial sections (150 μm) along the implant axis were obtained using a high-speed precision microtome (SP1600; Leica Microsystems, Inc.). All sections were ground and polished to a thickness of 35 μm. The sections were surface-stained using a Van Gieson solution and observed using an optical microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis
The quantitative data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. A one-way analysis of variance followed by a Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test was used to compare the means. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Cell morphology and proliferation remains unchanged with Sema3A treatment
The morphology and proliferation of ASCs under different concentrations of Sema3A were observed (Fig. 1). The cells spread widely with abundant cell-cell connections and no significant differences were identified under SEM observation (Fig. 1A). Additionally, no significant difference in cell proliferation was identified subsequent to treatment with various concentrations of Sema3A (Fig. 1B).
Sema3A upregulates expression levels of osteogenic-associated genes
The RT-qPCR analysis determined that ALP and COL1A1 mRNA expression levels were significantly upregulated, mostly in line with the increase of Sema3A concentration (P<0.05; Fig. 2). Specifically, the mRNA levels of ALP and COL1A1 increased by 5-fold and 7-fold, respectively, following treatment with Sema3A from 0.25 to 1.0 μg/ml at day 3 (Fig. 2A). At day 7, the mRNA levels increased significantly when compared with the control ASCs group by 7-fold and 5-fold, respectively, in the ALP and COL1A1 groups (P<0.05; Fig. 2B).
Osteogenesis staining is altered by Sema3A
The osteogenic differentiation was further analyzed by staining for ALP production, collagen secretion and ECM mineralization using BCIP/NBT, Sirius red and Alizarin red staining, respectively. In agreement with the gene expression data, the ALP production and collagen secretion were observed to be greater with the increase of Sema3A concentration (Fig. 3). No differences between the treatment groups were identified from the ECM mineralization of the samples, however this may be due to insufficient induction time.
Osseointegration is greater in rats implanted with Sema3A ASC sheets
To confirm that Sema3A may improve osseointegration in vivo, ASC sheets were produced and modified with Sema3A in order to coat Ti implants. The formation of new bone around the implant was examined by micro-CT scanning (Fig. 4). The Sema3A-modified ASC sheets had formulated more new bone (green section) around the implant (red section), 4 weeks and 8 weeks subsequent to insertion (Fig. 4A). The quantitative analysis of the ROI demonstrated that the new bone volume and number (4 weeks) and the new bone volume, thickness and number (8 weeks) were significantly greater in the rats implanted with the Sema3A-modified ASC sheet compared with the ASCs only sheet (P<0.05; Fig. 4B–D).
Bone formation is increased in rats with Sema3A-modified ASC sheets compared with ASC-only rats
In the ASC sheet-only group, 4 weeks after implantation, the new bone formation observed was thin compared with the intermittent but thicker new bone formation around the implant surface observed in the Sema3A-modified ASCs sheet group (Fig. 5). At 8 weeks post-implantation, fragmented new bone formation was observed in the ASC sheet-only group, whereas continuous and thick new bone formation was evident in the Sema3A-modified ASC sheet group (Fig. 5).
Discussion
The proportion of the human population diagnosed with T2DM has increased rapidly worldwide, resulting in a clear health problem. Bone tissue is primarily damaged by the high glucose levels, which lead to the suppression of differentiation in osteoblastic lineage cells (25). To improve osseointegration in patients with T2DM, the current study introduced exogenous stem cells into the Ti implant periphery. The osteogenic capacity of ASCs was significantly increased with increases in Sema3A concentration. Therefore, ASCs are suggested to be suitable for bone engineering following Sema3A modification.
According to a previous study (19), the binding of Sema3A to neuropilin-1 may stimulate osteoblast and inhibit adipocyte differentiation via the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, whether the same molecular mechanism is active in ASCs remains to be elucidated. It is of note that an association between Sema3A and mesenchymal stem cells has been demonstrated. BMSCs have been identified to express Sema3A in order to regulate T-cell immunosuppression (26). The stimuli of Sema3A has been reported to induce mesenchymal stem cell-like properties in human periodontal ligament cells (27). Therefore, although the exact osteogenesis mechanism in ASCs remains unclear, it may be inferred that Sema3A and ASCs interact closely.
The morphology of stem cells may allow for determination of differentiation status. The spindle fibroblast-like shape indicates a low differentiation status, whereas the polygonal osteoblast-like shape indicates potential osteogenic differentiation (28). However, the present study has determined that all cells spread widely without clear morphological alterations subsequent to Sema3A treatment. This may be due to short incubation time; therefore the cells were unable to exhibit a morphological difference. In addition, it is possible that cell shape may be predominantly defined by substrate topography. Although Sema3A has been associated with cytoskeleton reorganization (29), the present study did not identify any alterations in the morphology of ASCs treated with Sema3A. Therefore, when the cells are grown on a glass surface, the ultra-smooth topography may give cells the opportunity to spread freely in all directions without obstacles. Proliferation is primarily recognized as the opposite of differentiation, as differentiated cells have demonstrated low proliferation and mitotic cells are not terminally differentiated (30). However, a recent study identified that proliferation and differentiation are two distinct translational programs (31). The current study confirmed that Sema3A may improve the osteogenic ability of ASCs without inducing their proliferation.
In order to determine the formation of new bone in vivo, micro-CT scanning and super-rigidity slicing were performed. Similar to the results of the in vitro experiments, the Sema3A pre-treated ASC sheet significantly improved the formation of new bone around the Ti implant. It is of note that Sema3A is only used during the ASC sheet formulation in vitro, while the in vivo bone formation enhancement occurs several weeks later. Therefore, the effect of Sema3A is evident in the differentiation process of the ASCs in the sheet long after its administration. A previous study observed that the osteogenic promotion effect of Sema3A is effective at the initial stage (27). Therefore, Sema3A is convenient to use in conjunction with Ti implants. There is a variety of bioactive molecules that may promote bone metabolism and previous studies have aimed to establish a sustained drug delivery system to acquire a prolonged effect. Sema3A allows for treatment at the initial stage and avoids the problems surrounding long-term delivery. Another important advantage of the current study is that the systematic infusion of ASCs has been validated as a novel therapy for T2DM (32). Sema3A-modified ASCs may be a reliable choice for improving osseointegration in T2DM patients.
The present study demonstrated that Sema3A may significantly improve the osteogenesis ability of the ASC sheet and may be able to facilitate osseointegration under T2DM conditions.
Acknowledgments
The present study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81170984, 81470775 and 81300918). The manuscript was been revised by the Elsevier English Language Service. The authors would like to thank the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, Fourth Military Medical University (Xi'an, China) for the technical assistance.
References
Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP and Zwahlen M: Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 18(Suppl 3): 97–113. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu YY, Yu T, Yang XY, Li F, Ma L, Yang Y, Liu XG, Wang YY and Gong P: Vitamin D3 and insulin combined treatment promotes titanium implant osseointegration in diabetes mellitus rats. Bone. 52:1–8. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zou GK, Song YL, Zhou W, Yu M, Liang LH, Sun DC, Li DH, Deng ZX and Zhu WZ: Effects of local delivery of bFGF from PLGA microspheres on osseointegration around implants in diabetic rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio. 114:284–289. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mellado-Valero A, Ferrer García JC, Herrera Ballester A and Labaig Rueda C: Effects of diabetes on the osseointegration of dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 12:E38–E43. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gopalakrishnan V, Vignesh RC, Arunakaran J, Aruldhas MM and Srinivasan N: Effects of glucose and its modulation by insulin and estradiol on BMSC differentiation into osteoblastic lineages. Biochem Cell Biol. 84:93–101. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu M, Zhou W, Song Y, Yu F, Li D, Na S, Zou G, Zhai M and Xie C: Development of mesenchymal stem cell-implant complexes by cultured cells sheet enhances osseointegration in type 2 diabetic rat model. Bone. 49:387–394. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan J, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Cao C, Wu K, Zhao L and Zhang Y: Non-viral oligonucleotide antimiR-138 delivery to mesenchymal stem cell sheets and the effect on osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 35:7734–7749. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Auquier P, Macquart-Moulin G, Moatti JP, Blache JL, Novakovitch G, Blaise D, Faucher C, Viens P and Maraninchi D: Comparison of anxiety, pain and discomfort in two procedures of hematopoietic stem cell collection: Leukacytapheresis and bone marrow harvest. Bone marrow Transplant. 16:541–547. 1995.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nishimori M, Yamada Y, Hoshi K, Akiyama Y, Hoshi Y, Morishima Y, Tsuchida M, Fukuhara S and Kodera Y: Health-related quality of life of unrelated bone marrow donors in Japan. Blood. 99:1995–2001. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hiwatashi N, Hirano S, Mizuta M, Tateya I, Kanemaru S, Nakamura T and Ito J: Adipose-derived stem cells versus bone marrow-derived stem cells for vocal fold regeneration. Laryngoscope. 124:E461–E469. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Semon JA, Maness C, Zhang X, Sharkey SA, Beuttler MM, Shah FS, Pandey AC, Gimble JM, Zhang S, Scruggs BA, et al: Comparison of human adult stem cells from adipose tissue and bone marrow in the treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 5:22014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lin YC, Grahovac T, Oh SJ, Ieraci M, Rubin JP and Marra KG: Evaluation of a multi-layer adipose-derived stem cell sheet in a full-thickness wound healing model. Acta Biomater. 9:5243–5250. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Romagnoli C and Brandi ML: Adipose mesenchymal stem cells in the field of bone tissue engineering. World J Stem Cells. 6:144–152. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liao HT and Chen CT: Osteogenic potential: Comparison between bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. World J Stem Cells. 6:288–295. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niemeyer P, Fechner K, Milz S, Richter W, Suedkamp NP, Mehlhorn AT, Pearce S and Kasten P: Comparison of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue for bone regeneration in a critical size defect of the sheep tibia and the influence of platelet-rich plasma. Biomaterials. 31:3572–3579. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kini U and Nandeesh BN: Physiology of bone formation, remodeling and metabolism. Radionuclide and Hybrid Bone Imaging. Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G and van der Wall H: Springer Berlin; Heidelberg: pp. 29–57. 2012, View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hodsman AB, Bauer DC, Dempster DW, Dian L, Hanley DA, Harris ST, Kendler DL, McClung MR, Miller PD, Olszynski WP, et al: Parathyroid hormone and teriparatide for the treatment of osteoporosis: A review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for its use. Endocr Rev. 26:688–703. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neer RM, Arnaud CD, Zanchetta JR, Prince R, Gaich GA, Reginster JY, Hodsman AB, Eriksen EF, Ish-Shalom S, Genant HK, et al: Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 344:1434–1441. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hayashi M, Nakashima T, Taniguchi M, Kodama T, Kumanogoh A and Takayanagi H: Osteoprotection by semaphorin 3A. Nature. 485:69–74. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fukuda T, Takeda S, Xu R, Ochi H, Sunamura S, Sato T, Shibata S, Yoshida Y, Gu Z, Kimura A, et al: Sema3A regulates bone-mass accrual through sensory innervations. Nature. 497:490–493. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pieri F, Lucarelli E, Corinaldesi G, Aldini NN, Fini M, Parrilli A, Dozza B, Donati D and Marchetti C: Dose-dependent effect of adipose-derived adult stem cells on vertical bone regeneration in rabbit calvarium. Biomaterials. 31:3527–3535. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang G, Guo B, Wu H, Tang T, Zhang BT, Zheng L, He Y, Yang Z, Pan X, Chow H, et al: A delivery system targeting bone formation surfaces to facilitate RNAi-based anabolic therapy. Nat Med. 18:307–314. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cerqueira MT, Pirraco RP, Santos TC, Rodrigues DB, Frias AM, Martins AR, Reis RL and Marques AP: Human adipose stem cells cell sheet constructs impact epidermal morphogenesis in full-thickness excisional wounds. Biomacromolecules. 14:3997–4008. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hamann C, Goettsch C, Mettelsiefen J, Henkenjohann V, Rauner M, Hempel U, Bernhardt R, Fratzl-Zelman N, Roschger P, Rammelt S, et al: Delayed bone regeneration and low bone mass in a rat model of insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus is due to impaired osteoblast function. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 301:E1220–E1228. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lepelletier Y, Lecourt S, Renand A, Arnulf B, Vanneaux V, Fermand JP, Menasché P, Domet T, Marolleau JP, Hermine O and Larghero J: Galectin-1 and semaphorin-3A are two soluble factors conferring T-cell immunosuppression to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. Stem Cells Dev. 19:1075–1079. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wada N, Maeda H, Hasegawa D, Gronthos S, Bartold PM, Menicanin D, Fujii S, Yoshida S, Tomokiyo A, Monnouchi S and Akamine A: Semaphorin 3A induces mesenchymal-stem-like properties in human periodontal ligament cells. Stem Cells Dev. 23:2225–2236. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, Zhang Y and Chu PK: Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials. 33:2629–2641. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nakamura F, Kumeta K, Hida T, Isono T, Nakayama Y, Kuramata-Matsuoka E, Yamashita N, Uchida Y, Ogura K, Gengyo-Ando K, et al: Amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains of Filamin-A interact with CRMP1 to mediate Sema3A signalling. Nat Commun. 5:53252014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Klochendler A, Weinberg-Corem N, Moran M, Swisa A, Pochet N, Savova V, Vikeså J, Van de Peer Y, Brandeis M, Regev A, et al: A transgenic mouse marking live replicating cells reveals in vivo transcriptional program of proliferation. Dev Cell. 23:681–690. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gingold H, Tehler D, Christoffersen NR, Nielsen MM, Asmar F, Kooistra SM, Christophersen NS, Christensen LL, Borre M, Sørensen KD, et al: A dual program for translation regulation in cellular proliferation and differentiation. Cell. 158:1281–1292. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hu J, Fu Z, Chen Y, Tang N, Wang L, Wang F, Sun R and Yan S: Effects of autologous adipose-derived stem cell infusion on type 2 diabetic rats. Endocr J. 62:339–352. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |