Human tonsil‑derived mesenchymal stromal cells enhanced myelopoiesis in a mouse model of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 8, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5604
- Pages: 3045-3051
-
Copyright: © Ryu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are defined as self-renewing progenitor cells with multi-lineage potential that differentiate into cells of mesodermal origin, including adipocytes, osteocytes, and chondrocytes, as well as non-mesodermal cells (1–4). MSCs are easily isolated from bone marrow (BM), adipose and other tissues, and have immune modulatory properties, including low antigenicity. Furthermore, MSCs secrete various chemicals to promote tissue preservation and regeneration, and to inhibit inflammation and fibrosis (5,6). Clinical investigations into the therapeutic potential of MSCs in various diseases are rapidly evolving. Previous studies have demonstrated that co-administration of MSCs with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in allogeneic HSC transplantation (HSCT) accelerated hematopoietic recovery (7,8), ameliorated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (9–11) and promoted tissue regeneration (12,13).
Allogeneic HSCT is a routine treatment for intractable hematologic malignancies (14). Previous studies have indicated that co-transplantation of BM-derived MSCs with donor HSCs promoted hematopoietic cell engraftment, prevented or treated GVHD, and accelerated marrow stromal regeneration (11). The use of MSCs in HSCT with HSCs enhanced long-term engraftment of human cells in animal models (15,16) and promising results regarding the enhancement of myelocytic or megakaryocytic engraftment in the co-transplantation of MSCs with HSCs have also been reported (17).
MSCs have been previously isolated from human tonsils and termed tonsil-derived MSCs (T-MSCs) (18). T-MSCs were demonstrated to exhibit the stem cell characteristics of self-renewal and proliferation, with the ability to differentiate into adipocytes, osteocytes and chondrocytes. Furthermore, the cells expressed endodermal markers and parathyroid cell markers (18), and were differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells (19). The authors hypothesized that T-MSCs may be equivalent to BM-derived MSCs with respect to induction or supplemental effects on BM reconstitution. T-MSCs were also hypothesized to be beneficial in hematopoiesis following BM transplantation (BMT). In the present study, a possible role and beneficial effect for T-MSCs in BM reconstitution was investigated using an allogeneic BMT mouse model.
Materials and methods
Animals
Eight-week-old female BALB/c (H-2d) mice and male C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were purchased from Orient Bio, Inc. (Seongnam, South Korea). Mice were housed separately at 21–23°C, 51–54% humidity with a 12-h light/dark cycle, and had access to food and water ad libitum. All animal studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Ewha Medical School (Seoul, South Korea) and conformed to international standards.
Culture of T-MSCs
T-MSC separation was performed as described previously (18). Surgically removed palatine tonsils were collected from patients (age, <10 years) undergoing tonsillectomy due to benign hypertrophic tonsils between September 2011 and December 2012. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients who participated in the study, and the study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ewha Womans University Medical Center (Mok-Dong Hospital, Seoul, South Korea). The tonsil tissues were minced with scissors and digested in RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) containing 210 U/ml collagenase type I (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 10 µg/ml DNase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min at 37°C. Mononuclear cells were obtained from the digested tonsil tissue by Ficoll® Paque density gradient centrifugation (300 × g for 30 min at room temperature with brake-off; GE Healthcare, Chalfont, UK). The cells were plated at a density of 1×107 cells/100-mm diameter culture dish in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin all from Welgene, Inc. (Gyeongsan-si, Korea). After 48 h, non-adherent cells were removed from the medium and adherent mononuclear cells (the T-MSCs) were placed in fresh culture medium. T-MSCs were labeled using the PKH26 MINI kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were re-suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich) (5×106 cells/ml) for injection into mice.
Isolation and preparation of murine BMCs
Eight-week-old C57BL/6 male mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the lower limbs (femurs and tibias) were collected. BMCs were harvested, following dissection and cleaning of the bones, by removing the ends of each bone and flushing the medullary cavities with serum-free RPMI-1640 medium (Welgene, Inc.) using a 25-gauge needle (Korea Vaccine, Ansan-si, Korea). A single cell suspension was produced by passing the BM suspension through a sterile 70-µm cell strainer (SPL Life Sciences, Pocheon, South Korea) and the filtrate was centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min. Isolated BMCs were incubated in red blood cell (RBC) lysis solution (Sigma-Aldrich; 0.15 M NH4Cl, 10 mM NaHCO3 and 10 mM disodium EDTA, all from Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 min followed by two washes with PBS. Following resuspension with PBS, 2×106 cells/200 µl were intravenously injected into recipient mice using 1-ml syringes (Sungshim, Bucheon-si, Korea).
Experimental design for recipient conditioning and BMT
Eight-week-old female BALB/c recipient mice received busulfan (Bu; Sigma-Aldrich) and cyclophosphamide (Cy; Baxter, Los Angeles, CA, USA) combination conditioning therapy. Bu (20 mg/kg) was injected on days 1 2, 3 and 4, followed by administration of Cy (100 mg/kg) on days 5 and 6 via intraperitoneal injection. Following one day of recovery, infusion of T-MSCs or T-MSCs + BMCs was performed on day 8 according to the following procedure. BMCs from donor mice were injected via the tail vein into each recipient mouse. The mice were divided into five groups, as follows: i) The control, no treatment group; ii) the Bu/Cy chemotherapy group, iii) the T-MSCs (following Bu/Cy) group; iv) the T-MSCs + BMCs (following Bu/Cy) group; and the BMCs (following Bu/Cy) group. All mice were administered with water containing antibiotics for 3 weeks to prevent bacterial infection.
Hematological and histological analysis
Three weeks after cell transplantation (day 28), the mice were anesthetized with Zoletil (0.012 ml/20 g body weight; Virbac, St. Louis, USA) and Rompun (0.008 ml/20 g body weight; Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea) and blood (1 ml) was collected by cardiac puncture into heparin-coated 1-ml syringes (JWphama, Seoul, Korea). Blood cells were counted using a Neubauer chamber and blood smear slides were prepared for staining. Peripheral blood smears were air-dried and dipped in methanol (Duksan, Ansan-si, Korea) three times for fixation, followed by Diff-Quik staining (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). The femurs of each mouse were isolated following cervical dislocation, and immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) and decalcified for embedding in paraffin (Korea Animal Medical Science Institute, Guri-si, Korea). BM sections (4 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; Sigma-Aldrich) and images of the tissue sections were captured using a BX-50 microscope and a DP-71 digital camera and imaging system (DPController 3.2.276.2) (all from Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Histological analysis was conducted using Image J software version 1.49 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) by selecting adipocytes in the BM using a color threshold. Other cells (erythroid and myeloid cells) were selected for BM area measurement.
Methylcellulose colony-forming assay
To analyze the colony-forming unit derived from hematopoietic stem cells, 5×105 cells were mixed with 4 ml MethoCult® media (Stemcell Technologies, Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada). The mixture was allowed to stand for 3 min to remove bubbles and a 1-ml mixture was dispensed by pipette for each 30-mm cell culture dish (triplicate assay). Cells were incubated for 3 weeks in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C with humidifying water-containing dishes. After 3 weeks of culture, the total colony was counted under an optical microscope (Olympus CKX41; Olympus Corp.) over a grid plate according to the shape and the size of the colonies.
Statistical analysis
The values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. The differences between groups were analyzed via two-way analysis of variance and Student's t-test using GraphPad Prism 6.04 software (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Co-transplantation of T-MSCs with BMCs improved survival in the allogeneic mouse of BMT
The degree of BM restoration in the mice was compared between the groups that received BMCs with or without T-MSCs following allogeneic BMT. Recipient female BALB/c mice were injected with Bu/Cy for 6 days (resulting in BM ablation), allowed to rest for one day, then injected with T-MSCs, with or without BMCs from C57BL/6 male mice (Fig. 1A). During the 3 weeks following cell transfer, the mice were followed up and survival was compared between the groups. The mean survival was 100% in the control group (17/17), 12.5% in the Bu/Cy ablation group (3/24), 44% in the T-MSCs only group (8/18), 50% in the T-MSCs + BMCs group (9/18) and 44% in the BMCs group (11/25). Although the survival rate of the groups injected with T-MSCs + BMCs or BMC only was improved compared with that in the Bu/Cy only group, the difference was not statistically significant (Fig. 1B).
Changes in the body weight of the mice were also monitored from the onset of Bu/Cy treatment, and it was observed that body weights began decreasing soon after Bu/Cy conditioning and cell transfer. Although the mice indicated signs of weight recovery by the end of the first week following cell transplantation, their body weights subsequently decreased. Upon completion of the study, the recovered body weights of surviving mice were comparable with those of the mice in the BMC only groups: Control group (21.00±0.83 g), the Bu/Cy group (17.75±2.48 g), the T-MSCs group (17.75±2.19 g), the T-MSCs + BMCs group (17.44±2.63 g), and the BMC group (17.60±2.38 g; Fig. 1C).
T-MSC injection led to recovery of peripheral mononuclear cells
In order to compare the effect of T-MSCs on the restoration of peripheral blood cells, blood smear slides were stained and differential cell counts were analyzed among the groups. Cell populations from the control group exhibited normal morphology and the Bu/Cy group demonstrated scant density of RBCs, leukocytes, and platelets, although the morphology for each of the cells was near normal (Fig. 2A). However, RBC counts indicated that the BMCs group (25.25±3.18×106) almost recovered to the level of the control (36.50±2.12×106). The Bu/Cy group (10.00±2.83×106), T-MSCs group (13.85±6.86×106), and T-MSCs + BMCs group (20.27±1.41×106) did not fully recover to normal and were significantly different; Fig. 2B). Leukocyte counts were lowest in the Bu/Cy group (3.40±0.28×105) and also in the T-MSCs group (6.00±0.56×105). Notably, in the T-MSCs + BMCs groups, leukocyte counts (34.13±5.00×105) recovered to above normal (control group) levels (25.20±5.01×105) while those of the BMCs group were lower than normal (8.70±1.27×105; Fig. 2C). Therefore, these results indicate a potential favorable effect on myelopoiesis resulting from co-transplantation of T-MSCs with allogeneic BMCs.
T-MSCs have a beneficial effect on BM reconstitution
To evaluate the effect of T-MSCs on BM reconstitution, the cellular densities of decalcified bone sections from each group were determined by H&E staining. The BM of mice from the control group was filled with various erythroid and myeloid cells, small adipocytes and a small number of megakaryocytes (Fig. 3A). The marrow space in the Bu/Cy treatment group was almost completely replaced by adipocytes and was vacant of cells of hematopoietic lineage. The T-MSCs group demonstrated increased BMC density compared with the Bu/Cy group (Fig. 3B). The marrow space of the co-transplantation group, T-MSCs + BMCs, was also filled with various BMCs, and a number of adipocytes and megakaryocytes. The BM cellular density was assessed by calculating the mean ratio of the area of BMCs to adipose cells in >10 different fields per slide. This quantitative analysis demonstrated higher BMC density in groups that received T-MSCs + BMCs compared with any other treatment group (62.81±10.32% vs. control, 75.71±3.63%) and those of the Bu/Cy group were the lowest (16.87±5.48%). As indicated in Fig. 3B, the BM cellularity of the T-MSCs + BMCs groups was almost normal (control; 75.71±3.63%). In the T-MSCs (37.97±8.19%) or BMCs only groups (33.29±6.98%), cellularity was significantly different from the normal control.
BM smears were stained and analyzed to determine the composition of cells with erythroid or myeloid lineage in the BM (Fig. 3C). For erythroid cells, all Bu/Cy-treated groups demonstrated decreased cell numbers and insufficient recovery (Fig. 3D). However, for myeloid cells in the BM smear, the cell numbers observed in the T-MSCs + BMCs groups were higher than those of other Bu/Cy-treated groups (the Bu/Cy, T-MSCs and BMCs groups; Table I).
T-MSCs enhanced colony formation in methylcellulose assay
To determine the effect of T-MSCs on proliferation and differentiation of BMCs in vitro, a methylcellulose colony assay (MethoCult®) was performed to evaluate erythroid and myeloid lineage differentiation from BM cells (Fig. 4A). Fibroblast-like cells were grown in MethoCult® dishes with T-MSC-only conditions and it was observed that the T-MSCs did not differentiate into hematopoietic lineage cells. For erythroid lineage cells, there was no significant difference between cells in the BMCs [colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E), 12.25±2.63 U/ml; burst-forming unit-erythroid (BFU-E), 6.00±3.37 U/ml] and the T-MSCs + BMCs groups (CFU-E, 11.00±1.63 U/ml; BFU-E, 0.75±0.50 U/ml). For the myeloid lineage, however, CFU-granulocyte/macrophage was significantly higher in T-MSCs + BMCs isolated from mice (19.50±12.92 U/ml) compared with those of BMCs only (0.25±0.50 U/ml; Fig. 4B). Thus, T-MSCs exerted a greater effect on myeloid differentiation of mice BMCs than on erythroid lineage cells.
Discussion
In the present study, the effect of human T-MSCs on BM reconstitution was investigated in a mouse allogeneic BMT model. Co-transplantation of T-MSCs with BMCs was demonstrated to be associated with increased myelopoiesis in vivo and in vitro.
BMT frequently induces GVHD, which results in engraftment failure; thus, long-term immune suppression treatment is required to prevent GVHD. Currently, co-transplantation of MSCs along with HSCs in HSCT or BMT is being actively investigated to minimize the continuous use of immunosuppressive therapeutic agents, reduce the incidence of GVHD syndrome and promote allograft survival (20,21).
To analyze the possible mechanism underlying the positive effect of T-MSCs on BM reconstruction, PKH26-stained T-MSCs in the BM were localized following infusion in Bu/Cy-treated mice. However, PKH-positive cells were not observed in the BM in these mice (data not shown). Although MSCs have multi-lineage potential to differentiate into various mature cells in vitro, they are rarely observed to truly engraft and survive in damaged host tissue (22). The present study also aimed to investigate whether T-MSCs differentiate into hematopoietic cells. The hematopoiesis potential was analyzed using MethoCult® medium culture, which indicated that no differentiation of T-MSCs into hematopoietic lineage cells had taken place, however, myeloid lineage cells (such as CFU-GM) increased. To evaluate how T-MSCs positively affected BM reconstruction, the cellular constitution in mouse BM and in peripheral blood was analyzed. Results of the current study demonstrated an increase of myeloid lineage cells in the T-MSCs + BMCs group, which was consistent with the increase of the CFU-GM colony in the in vitro experiment.
The present study also investigated the quantity of adipose tissue occupying the medullary space in the BM following conditioning chemotherapy. Histological findings indicated a relative increase in adipose tissue in the BM space of mice in the Bu/Cy chemotherapy group. A recent review indicated that increased adipocytes in the BM space damage the micro-environmental balance necessary to maintain hematopoiesis or osteogenesis, and disturb the interaction between HSCs and other cells (23). The findings of the present study suggested that increased adipocytes in the BM interrupt BMC engraftment, which is prevented or attenuated by T-MSCs. Future studies are required to define a mechanism for the enhancement of BM reconstitution by T-MSCs and to determine the mechanism by which the secretory function of T-MSCs is altered in the BM microenvironment.
Previous studies demonstrated that infused MSCs exert their effects via secreted trophic signals without localization within the damaged tissue (24). These regulatory and trophic factors, which are secreted by MSCs, include cytokines, chemokines and growth factors that are broadly defined as the MSC secretome (25). These trophic factors provide a supportive micro-environment for the regeneration of injured tissue, and decrease inflammation via modulation of cell survival, cell renewal, cell differentiation, inflammation and angiogenesis (2,5,22,26). The secretome of T-MSCs may be critical in BM reconstitution and future studies are required to investigate the secretory function of T-MSCs in vivo.
In conclusion, results from the current study suggest that the co-transplantation of T-MSCs with HSCs promotes successful BM engraftment in delayed or defective BM engraftment patients by enhancing myelopoiesis and possibly megakaryocytosis.
Acknowledgments
The present study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, which was funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (grant no. 2012M3A9C6049823).
References
Dexter TM, Spooncer E, Schofield R, Lord BI and Simmons P: Haemopoietic stem cells and the problem of self-renewal. Blood Cells. 10:315–339. 1984.PubMed/NCBI | |
Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S and Marshak DR: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 284:143–147. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toma C, Pittenger MF, Cahill KS, Byrne BJ and Kessler PD: Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to a cardiomyocyte phenotype in the adult murine heart. Circulation. 105:93–98. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanchez-Ramos J, Song S, Cardozo-Pelaez F, Hazzi C, Stedeford T, Willing A, Freeman TB, Saporta S, Janssen W, Patel N, et al: Adult bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neural cells in vitro. Exp Neurol. 164:247–256. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim EJ, Kim N and Cho SG: The potential use of mesenchymal stem cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Exp Mol Med. 45:e22013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H and Bieback K: Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 24:1294–1301. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Blanc K, Samuelsson H, Gustafsson B, Remberger M, Sundberg B, Arvidson J, Ljungman P, Lönnies H, Nava S and Ringdén O: Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells to enhance engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia. 21:1733–1738. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Macmillan ML, Blazar BR, DeFor TE and Wagner JE: Transplantation of ex-vivo culture-expanded parental haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells to promote engraftment in pediatric recipients of unrelated donor umbilical cord blood: Results of a phase I–II clinical trial. Bone Marrow Transplant. 43:447–454. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Joo SY, Cho KA, Jung YJ, Kim HS, Park SY, Choi YB, Hong KM, Woo SY, Seoh JY, Cho SJ and Ryu KH: Mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit graft-versus-host disease of mice in a dose-dependent manner. Cytotherapy. 12:361–370. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Blanc K, Frassoni F, Ball L, Locatelli F, Roelofs H, Lewis I, Lanino E, Sundberg B, Bernardo ME, Remberger M, et al: Developmental Committee of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplatation: Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: A phase II study. Lancet. 371:1579–1586. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Blanc K, Rasmusson I, Sundberg B, Götherström C, Hassan M, Uzunel M and Ringdén O: Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells. Lancet. 363:1439–1441. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dalle Carbonare L, Valenti MT, Zanatta M, Donatelli L and Lo Cascio V: Circulating mesenchymal stem cells with abnormal osteogenic differentiation in patients with osteoporosis. Arthritis Rheum. 60:3356–3365. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang GT, Gronthos S and Shi S: Mesenchymal stem cells derived from dental tissues vs. those from other sources: Their biology and role in regenerative medicine. J Dent Res. 88:792–806. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Blazar BR, Murphy WJ and Abedi M: Advances in graft-versus-host disease biology and therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 12:443–458. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Almeida-Porada G, Flake AW, Glimp HA and Zanjani ED: Cotransplantation of stroma results in enhancement of engraftment and early expression of donor hematopoietic stem cells in utero. Exp Hematol. 27:1569–1575. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nolta JA, Hanley MB and Kohn DB: Sustained human hematopoiesis in immunodeficient mice by cotransplantation of marrow stroma expressing human interleukin-3: Analysis of gene transduction of long-lived progenitors. Blood. 83:3041–3051. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Angelopoulou M, Novelli E, Grove JE, Rinder HM, Civin C, Cheng L and Krause DS: Cotransplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells enhances human myelopoiesis and megakaryocytopoiesis in NOD/SCID mice. Exp Hematol. 31:413–420. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ryu KH, Cho KA, Park HS, Kim JY, Woo SY, Jo I, Choi YH, Park YM, Jung SC and Chung SM: Tonsil-derived mesenchymal stromal cells: Evaluation of biologic, immunologic and genetic factors for successful banking. Cytotherapy. 14:1193–1202. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim SJ, Park MH, Moon HJ, Park JH, Ko Y and Jeong B: Polypeptide thermogels as a three dimensional culture scaffold for hepatogenic differentiation of human tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 6:17034–17043. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lechler RI, Sykes M, Thomson AW and Turka LA: Organ transplantation - how much of the promise has been realized? Nat Med. 11:605–613. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bluestone JA, Thomson AW, Shevach EM and Weiner HL: What does the future hold for cell-based tolerogenic therapy? Nat Rev Immunol. 7:650–654. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kupcova Skalnikova H: Proteomic techniques for characterisation of mesenchymal stem cell secretome. Biochimie. 95:2196–2211. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adler BJ, Kaushansky K and Rubin CT: Obesity-driven disruption of haematopoiesis and the bone marrow niche. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 10:737–748. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lai RC, Tan SS, Teh BJ, Sze SK, Arslan F, de Kleijn DP, Choo A and Lim SK: Proteolytic potential of the MSC exosome proteome: Implications for an exosome-mediated delivery of therapeutic proteasome. Int J Proteomics. 2012:9719072012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ranganath SH, Levy O, Inamdar MS and Karp JM: Harnessing the mesenchymal stem cell secretome for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cell Stem Cell. 10:244–258. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Le Blanc K and Pittenger M: Mesenchymal stem cells: Progress toward promise. Cytotherapy. 7:36–45. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |