Open Access

Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review)

  • Authors:
    • Jia Zhang
    • Ming Li
    • Zhirong Yao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 22, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5760
  • Pages: 4023-4029
  • Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM) are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), one of the most common hereditary disorders. However, a group of genetic disorders presenting with CALM have mutations that are involved in human skin pigmentation regulation signaling pathways, including KIT ligand/KIT proto‑oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase and Ras/mitogen‑activated protein kinase. These disorders, which include Legius syndrome, Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines or LEOPARD syndrome, and familial progressive hyperpigmentation) are difficult to distinguish from NF1 at early stages, using skin appearance alone. Furthermore, certain syndromes are clinically overlapping and molecular testing is a vital diagnostic method. The present review aims to provide an overview of these ‘NF1‑like’ inherited diseases and recommend a cost‑effective strategy for making a clear diagnosis among these diseases with an ambiguous borderline.

Introduction

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; OMIM 162200) is one of the most common hereditary disorders. It is predominantly characterized by multiple café-au-lait macules (CALM), skin-fold freckling, Lisch nodules and neurofibromas. However, as the condition exhibits age-dependent characteristics and there are a number of other overlapping syndromes and similar diseases, it is usually difficult to make an early clinical diagnosis. Currently, although there are numerous comprehensive detection methods available for molecular diagnosis of NF1, the highest sensitivity of any of these methods is ~95% (1,2). In addition to the limitations of detection by these approaches, cases of mosaic NF1 have been reported and there may exist other known or undefined genetic conditions with similar phenotypes. KIT ligand (KITLG) and its receptor KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (KIT) activate the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and they are critical in the control of physiological and pathological cutaneous pigmentation, including CALM (3). Known disorders with CALM comprise: i) A group of genetic syndromes resulting from germline mutations in genes that encode components or regulators of the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway, designated RASopathies, which consists of Noonan syndrome (NS; OMIM 163950), Legius syndrome [formerly termed NF1-like syndrome (NFLS); OMIM 611431], LEOPARD syndrome (LS; OMIM 151100), Costello syndrome (CS; OMIM 218040) and cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC; OMIM 115150), ii) disorders involving the KITLG/KIT signaling pathway, including piebaldism (OMIM 172800) and familial progressive hyperpigmentation (FPH; OMIM 145250). Although there are unique phenotypic characteristics for these conditions, certain syndromes remain highly overlapping and the differential diagnosis between them and NF1 is complex.

Our group recently conducted a large molecular research investigation into NF1 in a Chinese population (46). Patients without NF1 mutations who exhibited CALM were observed, and in a further study, other syndromes were demonstrated, including an atypical LS patient with a PTPN11 mutation, a piebaldism patient with a KIT mutation and a familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation (FPHH) patient with a KITLG mutation.

The present review discusses these KITLG/c-Kit- and Ras/MAPK signaling pathway-associated ‘NF1-like’ inherited diseases, and proposes a molecular screening strategy to aid the determination of a definitive diagnosis.

The RASopathies with CALM

NFLS

NFLS presents predominantly with CALM, intertriginous freckling and certain less common manifestations (~20%), including neurocognitive impairment, developmental delay and macrocephaly, usually without neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, optic pathway glioma and other tumors (7,8). More than 60% of the patients have a family history of the condition (9). These features meet three of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) diagnostic criteria for NF1 (10), thus, it is not reliable to distinguish NF1 from NFLS relying solely on clinical examination. Germline loss-of-function sprouty related, EVH1 domain containing 1 (SPRED1) mutations are responsible for this syndrome, which is most similar to NF1 in early childhood (11). It is estimated that ~1–4% of individuals with multiple CALM harbor heterozygous SPRED1 mutations (7,9). In subjects with familial CALM, with or without freckling and no other NF1 features, 73% and 19% carry pathogenic NF1 mutations or SPRED1 mutations, respectively (7), which further indicates that genetic testing is useful in diagnosis in these cases (92%). SPRED1 is involved in regulation of the MAPK signaling pathway, previous studies have demonstrated a loss of heterozygosity in pediatric acute myeloblastic leukemia, acting as a tumor suppressor (12,13), this also indicates that this syndrome increases the risk of developing specific hematological malignancies, as well as other rare conditions, including kidney and lung cancer (8).

LS

LS is an autosomal dominant RASopathy, predominantly caused by mutations in protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11; 85%), in addition to less common genes, Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (RAF1) and B-raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) (10%). Individuals present with characteristic multiple lentigines, and relatively common features of RASopathies, including facial dysmorphia, myocardial and valvular abnormalities, and hearing loss. It is hard to clinically distinguish LS from other RASopathies, such as NF1 and NS, while molecular diagnosis is relatively reliable.

Twelve different missense PTPN11 mutations (Tyr279Cys/Ser, Ala461Thr/Ser, Gly464Ala, Thr468Met/Pro, Arg498Leu/Trp, Gln506Pro and Gln510Glu/Pro) (1418) were reported to result in LS. Two of these mutations (Tyr279Cys and Thr468Met) account for ~65% of the cases. Notably, these mutations cluster in the catalytic protein tyrosine phosphatase domain (amino acid residues, 221–524) (19), as in the allelic disorder, NS, the majority of missense mutations, small deletions and indels (20,21) are associated with the N-SH2 domain (amino acid residues, 3–104) (14). Contrary to the gain-of-function changes resulting in excessive PTPN11 activity in NS (12), LS mutants are catalytically defective and exert a dominant negative effect (22), suggesting that mutation type and region are important in the underlying pathogenic mechanisms and differential diagnoses of NS and LS. A recent study has suggested that LS-associated mutations may increase melanin synthesis in melanocytes via the activation of Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin signaling, thus, resulting in a phenotype with multiple lentigines (23).

Furthermore, a recent study identified a novel heterozygous MAPK kinase 1 (MAP2K1) mutation in LS, Glu102Gly (24), this is notable as mutations in this gene are usually associated with CFC. LS shares numerous phenotypic traits with CFC. Including this case, at present, germline mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF genes are associated with CFC and LS. CALM and multiple nevi or lentigines are rare or absent in CFC patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations (25), further demonstrating the complicated genetic heterogeneity and prominent overlapping feature of RASopathies.

CALM precede or are associated with lentigines in~10% of NS cases (26), and in up to 75% of LS cases (27), furthermore, in LS cases, the number of CALM can fulfills NIH criteria for diagnosis with NF1 (28). Lentigines usually appear during childhood as black-brown macules, predominantly on the face, neck and upper part of the trunk, and gradually increase in number and darken in color with age. Although LS patients have unclear disposition to malignancies, certain studies have reported an association with hematologic malignancies (29) and medulloblastoma (30), which should be noted.

NS-CFC-CS spectrum

NS shares numerous congenital anomalies with LS, excluding multiple lentigines. CFC and CS also have various clinical similarities and few differences compared with NS (25). Previously, clinical discrimination between these three syndromes was predominantly based on respective characteristic features, including hyperkeratotic skin, ichthyosis and keratosis pilaris in CFC patients; and soft and loose skin, deep palmar/plantar creases, nasal papillomas and an increased risk of developing malignancies in those with CS (31,32). However, as the reported cases of RASopathies increase, these distinct features have also become highly overlapped.

Previous studies have demonstrated that one or two CALM are observed in 9–31% of individuals in NS-CFC-CS spectrum disorders, this is markedly higher than the overall prevalence of 2.5% in neonates (33), while multiple CALM and intertriginous freckling were rare or absent (25,26,34). In combination with the less common dysmorphic craniofacial features in NF1, the discrimination between these conditions and NF1 is relatively easier.

KRAS mutations associated with the NS-CFC-CS spectrum predominantly confer mild gain-of-function effect (35). The present review suggests that KRAS mutations associated with the NS-CFC-CS spectrum belong to an identical entity relatively close to NS (see Table I, which provides a proper hypothesis for a new classification of these RASopathies and corresponding causal genes) as: i) CFC, NS and CS exhibit numerous clinical similarities and few differences (25,36,37); ii) KRAS mutations have been reported in <2% of the NS and CFC cases (37), as well as in only a handful of CS patients (35,38), and all three of the independent conditions demonstrated their major pathogenic form, PTPN11, BRAF and HRAS, respectively (presented in Table I); iii) mutations Asp153Val, Thr58Ile and other missense mutations in the same amino acid residue in KRAS were reported to result in NS and CFC (25,39,40); iv) less prominent ectodermal phenotypes were observed in CFC and CS with KRAS mutations than those with BRAF mutations (25,34,39,41); v) multiple nevi or lentigines were rare or absent in CFC patients with KRAS mutations compared with those with mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF (25).

Table I.

‘NF1-like’ genetic disorders with CALM involved in KITLG/c-Kit and Ras/MAPK signaling pathways.

Table I.

‘NF1-like’ genetic disorders with CALM involved in KITLG/c-Kit and Ras/MAPK signaling pathways.

Genetic disorderKnown causal genes (proportion)Disease identityGene identityCharacteristic features
NSPTPN11 (50%) SOS1 (10–15%) RAF1 (5%) RIT1 (5%) KRAS (<2%) BRAF (rare) NRAS (rare) SHOC2 (rare) CBL (rare)NSPTPN11 SOS1 RAF1 RIT1 NRAS SHOC2 CBLCALM (10%). Dysmorphic craniofacial features, cardiac defect (pulmonary valve stenosis, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), musculoskeletal abnormalities, mental retardation, cryptorchidism, hematologic malignancies
KRAS-associated NS-CFC-CS spectrumKRASLess prominent ectodermal phenotypes; multiple nevi or lentigines were rare or absent
CFCBRAF (50–70%) MAP2K1/2 (25%) KRAS (<2%)CFCBRAF MAP2K1/2CALM (9–31%). Similar to NS. Ectodermal abnormalities such as multiple nevi, keratosis pilaris, ulerythema ophryogenes and brittle, sparse, curly hair. Potential cancer risk
CSHRAS (>90%) BRAF (rare) KRAS (rare)CSHRASCALM (rare). Similar to NS. Ectodermal abnormalities like soft skin, deep palmar/plantar creases, papillomas and curly hair. Severe failure to thrive. Significant cancer risk (17%)
LSPTPN11 (85%) RAF1 (rare) BRAF (rare) MAP2K1 (1 case) CALM (70–80%). Similar to NS, but with multiple lentigines mostly on face, neck and upper part of the trunk. Unclear cancer risk
NFLSSPRED1 Multiple CALM (nearly 100%), intertriginous freckling. Potential risk of pediatric AML
PiebaldismKIT Depigmented patches of skin and hair
FPH and FPHHKITLGFPHHKITLGDiffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered hypopigmentations, lentigines and CALM

[i] NF1, neurofibromatosis type 1; CALM, café-au-lait macules; KITLG, KIT ligand; c-Kit, KIT proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; NS, Noonan syndrome; CFC, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome; CS, Costello syndrome; LS, LEOPARD syndrome; NFLS, NF1-like syndrome, Legius syndrome; FPH, familial progressive hyperpigmentation; FPHH, familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation; HRAS, Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; KRAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog; PTPN11, protein tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11; SOS1, son of severnless homolog 1; RAF1, Raf-1 proto-oncogene serine/threonine protein kinase; RIT1, Ras-like without CAAX 1; BRAF, B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; NRAS, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog; SHOC2, SHOC2 leucine-rich repeat scaffold protein; CBL, Cbl proto-oncogene, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase; MAP2K, MAPK kinase; SPRED1, sprouty related, EVH1 domain containing 1.

In the majority of instances, BRAF mutations resulting in NS have not been observed in CFC, suggesting the associated phenotypes may be allele specific (42), however, a number of BRAF mutations, including Ala246Pro and Gln257Arg, have been demonstrated in the two conditions (25).

Previous studies have also demonstrated the evolution of the clinical phenotype in a CFC patient, and the marked resemblance between CFC and NS, consistent with the suggestion that NS and CFC are variable manifestations of the same entity (36,43).

Taking updated molecular findings, reviews of complex genetic heterogeneity and the highly overlapping features of these disorders into consideration, the present review hypothesizes these three disorders may be not distinct and separate conditions, but a continuous spectrum consisting of a certain gene or group of gene-related subtypes with certain degrees of phenotypic variability, particularly KRAS-associated NS-CFC-CS spectrum (as presented in Table I), or multiple alternative underlying mechanisms are involved in the functional dysregulation of the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway.

Allelic syndromes of NF1: Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome and Watson syndrome

The disorder designated neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome (NFNS; OMIM 601321) is a variant of NF1 rather than NS, predominantly due to mutations in the NF1 gene (44). It may fulfill the criteria for NF1 with CALM and skin-fold freckling, but also has overlapping features with NS, including ‘Noonan’ face, short stature, congenital heart defects and a predisposition to malignancy.

Watson syndrome (WS; OMIM 193520) is characterized by pulmonic stenosis, CALM and intellectual impairment (45), furthermore, Lisch nodules are observed in the majority of affected subjects, and neurofibromas in ~1/3 (46). An 80-kb deletion and an in-frame tandem duplication of 42 bases at the NF1 locus have been reported in patients with WS (47,48). These findings broaden the noteworthy NF1-associated phenotype spectrum and are consistent with NFNS and WS as allelic disorders or subtypes of NF1. An alternative explanation is that they are the result of an additive effect of mutations in NF1 and other relevant genes, including PTPN11 or unknown modifying loci (49,50).

KITLG/KIT signaling pathway-associated genetic disorders with CALM

Piebaldism

Piebaldism is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by KIT mutations. Characteristic features are depigmented patches of skin and hair (as presented in Fig. 1). Of the three reported piebaldism cases with multiple CALM and intertriginous freckling, all the mutations were located in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain (Gly610Asp, Gliu640Asp and Arg791Gly) (5153). It has been demonstrated that inadequate phosphorylation of the KIT-binding domain in SPRED1 due to a defective KIT TK would result in loss of inhibition of the Ras⁄MAPK signaling pathway, leading to a phenotype similar to NFLS (53), while gain-of function mutations in KITLG have been reported to result in FPHH (54), indicating KIT and KITLG are important modulators of skin pigmentation.

Phenotypic severity depends on the type and site of the mutation (55,56). Mutations in the TK region (TK1, 582–684 and TK2, 762–973) exert a dominant-negative effect, usually resulting in a severe phenotype, whereas mild cases are frequently due to mutations in the extracellular region.

Patients with piebaldism may develop CALM (as presented in Fig. 1), NF1 may be associated with piebaldism, and these two distinct conditions may co-exist in one patient (57,58), which highlights the necessity of molecular diagnosis.

FPHH and FPH

FPHH is notable for progressive, diffuse, partly blotchy hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered hypopigmented spots, lentigines and CALM (as presented in Fig. 2) (6). It is the result of a mutation in KITLG, encoding KITLG involved in the Ras⁄MAPK signaling pathway (54). Clinical signs are somewhat different from its allelic disorder FPH (59), in which no hypopigmentation is present. Notably, the mutation p.Asn36Ser results in FPH and FPHH, with the FPH patient image in a previous study by Wang et al (59) also demonstrating small suspicious hypopigmented lesions (54). This suggests these two disorders may resemble another pigmentary genetic disorder termed Dowling-Degos disease (DDD; OMIM 179850, 615327 and 615696) (6063), which may also be the same condition with a degree of phenotypic variability, for example, in the distribution of hyperpigmented and hypopigmented lesions.

Conclusion

The RASopathies have complex genetic heterogeneity and marked overlapping features, however, a relatively correct diagnosis is essential for genetic counseling regarding prognosis (as the diagnosis of milder phenotypes, including NFLS or mosaic NF1, may relieve the psychological burden on serious age-dependent complications); monitoring of potential risks, including cancer and cardiac events; and prevention using prenatal diagnosis.

Thus, the current review proposes a screening strategy in which: i) NF1 testing has a priority for patients that only exhibit CALM or fulfill the NIH diagnostic criteria for NF1; ii) SPRED1 and NF1 should be tested in those with skin-fold freckling and a family history; iii) in NF1-negative pediatric patients with CALM and a dispersed pattern of facial and cervical freckles, PTPN11 should be first considered for molecular analysis, as it accounts for the majority of LS and NS cases; iv) genetic testing of KITLG and KIT is used and relatively effective in those with diffuse hyperpigmented lesions intermingled with scattered depigmentation, depigmented patches of skin and hair, respectively (as presented in Fig. 3).

As for other RASopathies, BRAF and HRAS analysis is suitable for relatively typical CFC and CS presentations, respectively. However, when considering the highly overlapping phenotypes and involvement of numerous genes, a custom-designed screening kit including all the candidate genes for the various RASopathies is a thorough alternative choice.

Furthermore, few patients with CALM fall outside the above mentioned disorders and their condition may be the result of mutations in other undetected genes associated with the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway, for instance, recently identified causal genes Cbl proto-oncogene E3 ubiquitin protein ligase and Ras-like without CAAX 1 (64,65). Considering the detection limit of general sequencing methods, especially for those atypical or unreported phenotypes, next generation sequencing (such as whole exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing) still serves as a cost-effective approach for molecular diagnosis of the above disorders with CALS, as well as other possible genetic diseases, including neurofibromatosis type 2 (OMIM 101000) with vestibular schwannomas; McCune-Albright syndrome (OMIM 174800) with segmental CALM, polyostotic fibrous dysplasia and precocious puberty; constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (OMIM 276300) with childhood cancer predisposition (66); and various mosaic conditions associated with CALM (as presented in Fig. 3).

Acknowledgements

The current review was supported by a grant from the Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (grant no. 20130073120014), a grant from the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (grant no. 13XJ10023) and a grant from the Foundation of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (grant no. 15YJ15).

References

1 

Messiaen LM, Callens T, Mortier G, Beysen D, Vandenbroucke I, Van Roy N, Speleman F and Paepe AD: Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects. Hum Mutat. 15:541–555. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Valero MC, Martin Y, Hernández-Imaz E, Marina Hernández A, Meleán G, Valero AM, Javier Rodríguez-Álvarez F, Tellería D and Hernández-Chico C: A highly sensitive genetic protocol to detect NF1 mutations. J Mol Diagn. 13:113–122. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Picardo M and Cardinali G: The genetic determination of skin pigmentation: KITLG and the KITLG/c-Kit pathway as key players in the onset of human familial pigmentary diseases. J Invest Dermatol. 131:1182–1185. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Zhang J, Tong H, Fu X, Zhang Y, Liu J, Cheng R, Liang J, Peng J, Sun Z, Liu H, et al: Molecular characterization of NF1 and neurofibromatosis type 1 genotype-phenotype correlations in a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 5:112912015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Zhang J, Cheng R, Liang J, Ni C, Li M and Yao Z: Lentiginous phenotypes caused by diverse pathogenic genes (SASH1 and PTPN11): Clinical and molecular discrimination. Clin Genet. Feb 3–2016.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Zhang J, Cheng R, Liang J, Ni C, Li M and Yao Z: Report of a sporadic familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation child caused by a novel KITLG mutation. Br J Dermatol. Apr 23–2016.Epub ahead of print. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Messiaen L, Yao S, Brems H, Callens T, Sathienkijkanchai A, Denayer E, Spencer E, Arn P, Babovic-Vuksanovic D, Bay C, et al: Clinical and mutational spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1-like syndrome. JAMA. 302:2111–2118. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Brems H, Pasmant E, Van Minkelen R, Wimmer K, Upadhyaya M, Legius E and Messiaen L: Review and update of SPRED1 mutations causing Legius syndrome. Hum Mutat. 33:1538–1546. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Brems H and Legius E: Legius syndrome, an update. Molecular pathology of mutations in SPRED1. Keio J Med. 62:107–112. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

[No authors lsited]: Neurofibromatosis. Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference, . Arch Neurol. 45:575–578. 1988. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Brems H, Chmara M, Sahbatou M, Denayer E, Taniguchi K, Kato R, Somers R, Messiaen L, De Schepper S, Fryns JP, et al: Germline loss-of-function mutations in SPRED1 cause a neurofibromatosis 1-like phenotype. Nat Genet. 39:1120–1126. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Pasmant E, Gilbert-Dussardier B, Petit A, de Laval B, Luscan A, Gruber A, Lapillonne H, Deswarte C, Goussard P, Laurendeau I, et al: SPRED1, a RAS MAPK pathway inhibitor that causes Legius syndrome, is a tumour suppressor downregulated in paediatric acute myeloblastic leukaemia. Oncogene. 34:631–638. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Pasmant E, Ballerini P, Lapillonne H, Perot C, Vidaud D, Leverger G and Landman-Parker J: SPRED1 disorder and predisposition to leukemia in children. Blood. 114:11312009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Tartaglia M, Mehler EL, Goldberg R, Zampino G, Brunner HG, Kremer H, van der Burgt I, Crosby AH, Ion A, Jeffery S, et al: Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 29:465–468. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Conti E, Dottorini T, Sarkozy A, Tiller GE, Esposito G, Pizzuti A and Dallapiccola B: A novel PTPN11 mutation in LEOPARD syndrome. Hum Mutat. 21:6542003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Martínez-Quintana E and Rodríguez-González F: LEOPARD Syndrome: Clinical features and gene mutations. Mol Syndromol. 3:145–157. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

17 

Wang Y, Chen C and Wang DW: Leopard syndrome caused by heterozygous missense mutation of Tyr 279 Cys in the PTPN11 gene in a sporadic case of Chinese Han. Int J Cardiol. 174:e101–e104. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Osawa R, Akiyama M, Yamanaka Y, Ujiie H, Nemoto-Hasebe I, Takeda A, Yanagi T and Shimizu H: A novel PTPN11 missense mutation in a patient with LEOPARD syndrome. Brit J Dermatol. 161:1202–1204. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Digilio MC, Conti E, Sarkozy A, Mingarelli R, Dottorini T, Marino B, Pizzuti A and Dallapiccola B: Grouping of multiple-lentigines/LEOPARD and Noonan syndromes on the PTPN11 gene. Am J Hum Genet. 71:389–394. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yoshida R, Hasegawa T, Hasegawa Y, Nagai T, Kinoshita E, Tanaka Y, Kanegane H, Ohyama K, Onishi T, Hanew K, et al: Protein-tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 11 mutation analysis and clinical assessment in 45 patients with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 89:3359–3364. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Tartaglia M, Martinelli S, Stella L, Bocchinfuso G, Flex E, Cordeddu V, Zampino G, Burgt Iv, Palleschi A, Petrucci TC, et al: Diversity and functional consequences of germline and somatic PTPN11 mutations in human disease. Am J Hum Genet. 78:279–290. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Kontaridis MI, Swanson KD, David FS, Barford D and Neel BG: PTPN11 (Shp2) mutations in LEOPARD syndrome have dominant negative, not activating, effects. J Biol Chem. 281:6785–6792. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Motegi S, Yokoyama Y, Ogino S, Yamada K, Uchiyama A, Perera B, Takeuchi Y, Ohnishi H and Ishikawa O: Pathogenesis of multiple lentigines in LEOPARD syndrome with PTPN11 gene mutation. Acta Derm Venereol. 95:978–984. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Nishi E, Mizuno S, Nanjo Y, Niihori T, Fukushima Y, Matsubara Y, Aoki Y and Kosho T: A novel heterozygous MAP2K1 mutation in a patient with Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines. Am J Med Genet A 167A. 407–411. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Nava C, Hanna N, Michot C, Pereira S, Pouvreau N, Niihori T, Aoki Y, Matsubara Y, Arveiler B, Lacombe D, et al: Cardio-facio-cutaneous and Noonan syndromes due to mutations in the RAS/MAPK signalling pathway: Genotype-phenotype relationships and overlap with Costello syndrome. J Med Genet. 44:763–771. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Allanson JE: Noonan syndrome. J Med Genet. 24:9–13. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Digilio MC, Sarkozy A, de Zorzi A, Pacileo G, Limongelli G, Mingarelli R, Calabrò R, Marino B and Dallapiccola B: LEOPARD syndrome: Clinical diagnosis in the first year of life. Am J Med Genet A. 140:740–746. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Carcavilla A, Pinto I, Muñoz-Pacheco R, Barrio R, Martin-Frias M and Ezquieta B: LEOPARD syndrome (PTPN11, T468 M) in three boys fulfilling neurofibromatosis type 1 clinical criteria. Eur J Pediatr. 170:1069–1074. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Tartaglia M, Niemeyer CM, Fragale A, Song X, Buechner J, Jung A, Hählen K, Hasle H, Licht JD and Gelb BD: Somatic mutations in PTPN11 in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet. 34:148–150. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Rankin J, Short J, Turnpenny P, Castle B and Hanemann CO: Medulloblastoma in a patient with the PTPN11 p.Thr468Met mutation. Am J Med Genet A 161A. 2027–2029. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Hennekam RC: Costello syndrome: An overview. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet 117C. 42–48. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Bryan ZT, Missall TA, Stieren S, Siegfried E and Burkemper NM: Clinicopathologic evaluation of cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome: Overcoming the challenges of diagnosing a rare genodermatosis. Pediatr Dermatol. 32:e23–e28. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Alper J, Holmes LB and Mihm MC Jr: Birthmarks with serious medical significance: Nevocellular nevi, sebaceous nevi, and multiple café au lait spots. J Pediatr. 95:696–700. 1979. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Siegel DH, McKenzie J, Frieden IJ and Rauen KA: Dermatological findings in 61 mutation-positive individuals with cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. Brit J Dermatol. 164:521–529. 2011.

35 

Zenker M, Lehmann K, Schulz AL, Barth H, Hansmann D, Koenig R, Korinthenberg R, Kreiss-Nachtsheim M, Meinecke P, Morlot S, et al: Expansion of the genotypic and phenotypic spectrum in patients with KRAS germline mutations. J Med Genet. 44:131–135. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Fryer AE, Holt PJ and Hughes HE: The cardio-facio-cutaneous (CFC) syndrome and Noonan syndrome: Are they the same? Am J Med Genet. 38:548–551. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Tidyman WE and Rauen KA: Noonan, Costello and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes: Dysregulation of the Ras-MAPK pathway. Expert Rev Mol Med. 10:e372008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Bertola DR, Pereira AC, Brasil AS, Albano LM, Kim CA and Krieger JE: Further evidence of genetic heterogeneity in Costello syndrome: Involvement of the KRAS gene. J Hum Genet. 52:521–526. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Niihori T, Aoki Y, Narumi Y, Neri G, Cavé H, Verloes A, Okamoto N, Hennekam RC, Gillessen-Kaesbach G, Wieczorek D, et al: Germline KRAS and BRAF mutations in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Nat Genet. 38:294–296. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Schubbert S, Zenker M, Rowe SL, Böll S, Klein C, Bollag G, van der Burgt I, Musante L, Kalscheuer V, Wehner LE, et al: Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet. 38:331–336. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Abe Y, Aoki Y, Kuriyama S, Kawame H, Okamoto N, Kurosawa K, Ohashi H, Mizuno S, Ogata T, Kure S, et al: Prevalence and clinical features of Costello syndrome and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome in Japan: Findings from a nationwide epidemiological survey. Am J Med Genet A 158A. 1083–1094. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Sarkozy A, Carta C, Moretti S, Zampino G, Digilio MC, Pantaleoni F, Scioletti AP, Esposito G, Cordeddu V, Lepri F, et al: Germline BRAF mutations in Noonan, LEOPARD, and cardiofaciocutaneous syndromes: Molecular diversity and associated phenotypic spectrum. Hum Mutat. 30:695–702. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Neri G and Zollino M: More on the Noonan-CFC controversy. Am J Med Genet. 65:1001996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

De Luca A, Bottillo I, Sarkozy A, Carta C, Neri C, Bellacchio E, Schirinzi A, Conti E, Zampino G, Battaglia A, et al: NF1 gene mutations represent the major molecular event underlying neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 77:1092–1101. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Watson GH: Pulmonary stenosis, café-au-lait spots, and dull intelligence. Arch Dis Child. 42:303–307. 1967. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Allanson JE, Upadhyaya M, Watson GH, Partington M, MacKenzie A, Lahey D, MacLeod H, Sarfarazi M, Broadhead W, Harper PS, et al: Watson syndrome: Is it a subtype of type 1 neurofibromatosis? J Med Genet. 28:752–756. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Upadhyaya M, Shen M, Cherryson A, Farnham J, Maynard J, Huson SM and Harper PS: Analysis of mutations at the neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) locus. Hum Mol Genet. 1:735–740. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Tassabehji M, Strachan T, Sharland M, Colley A, Donnai D, Harris R and Thakker N: Tandem duplication within a neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene exon in a family with features of Watson syndrome and Noonan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 53:90–95. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

49 

Thiel C, Wilken M, Zenker M, Sticht H, Fahsold R, Gusek-Schneider GC and Rauch A: Independent NF1 and PTPN11 mutations in a family with neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 149A. 1263–1267. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Nyström AM, Ekvall S, Strömberg B, Holmström G, Thuresson AC, Annerén G and Bondeson ML: A severe form of Noonan syndrome and autosomal dominant café-au-lait spots-evidence for different genetic origins. Acta Paediatr. 98:693–698. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Spritz RA, Itin PH and Gutmann DH: Piebaldism and neurofibromatosis type 1: Horses of very different colors. J Invest Dermatol. 122:xxxiv–xxxv. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Duarte AF, Mota A, Baudrier T, Morais P, Santos A, Cerqueira R, Tavares P and Azevedo F: Piebaldism and neurofibromatosis type 1: Family report. Dermatol Online J. 16:112010.PubMed/NCBI

53 

Chiu YE, Dugan S, Basel D and Siegel DH: Association of Piebaldism, multiple café-au-lait macules, and intertriginous freckling: Clinical evidence of a common pathway between KIT and sprouty-related, ena/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein homology-1 domain containing protein 1 (SPRED1). Pediatr Dermatol. 30:379–382. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Amyere M, Vogt T, Hoo J, Brandrup F, Bygum A, Boon L and Vikkula M: KITLG mutations cause familial progressive hyper- and hypopigmentation. J Invest Dermatol. 131:1234–1239. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Oiso N, Fukai K, Kawada A and Suzuki T: Piebaldism. J Dermatol. 40:330–335. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Spritz RA: Molecular basis of human piebaldism. J Invest Dermatol. 103:(Suppl 5). S137–S140. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Angelo C, Cianchini G, Grosso MG, Zambruno G, Cavalieri R and Paradisi M: Association of piebaldism and neurofibromatosis type 1 in a girl. Pediatr Dermatol. 18:490–493. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Duarte A, Mota A, Baudrier T, Morais P, Santos A, Cerqueira R, Tavares P and Azevedo F: Piebaldism and neurofibromatosis: State of knowledge. Dermatol Online J. 19:172013.PubMed/NCBI

59 

Wang ZQ, Si L, Tang Q, Lin D, Fu Z, Zhang J, Cui B, Zhu Y, Kong X, Deng M, et al: Gain-of-function mutation of KIT ligand on melanin synthesis causes familial progressive hyperpigmentation. Am J Hum Genet. 84:672–677. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Betz RC, Planko L, Eigelshoven S, Hanneken S, Pasternack SM, Bussow H, Van Den Bogaert K, Wenzel J, Braun-Falco M, Rutten A, et al: Loss-of-function mutations in the keratin 5 gene lead to Dowling-Degos disease. Am J Hum Genet. 78:510–519. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Pickup TL and Mutasim DF: Dowling-Degos disease presenting as hypopigmented macules. J Am Acad Dermatol. 64:1224–1225. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

62 

Li M, Cheng R, Liang J, Yan H, Zhang H, Yang L, Li C, Jiao Q, Lu Z, He J, et al: Mutations in POFUT1, encoding protein O-fucosyltransferase 1, cause generalized Dowling-Degos disease. Am J Hum Genet. 92:895–903. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Basmanav FB, Oprisoreanu AM, Pasternack SM, Thiele H, Fritz G, Wenzel J, Größer L, Wehner M, Wolf S, Fagerberg C, et al: Mutations in POGLUT1, encoding protein O-glucosyltransferase 1, cause autosomal-dominant Dowling-Degos disease. Am J Hum Genet. 94:135–143. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Pérez B, Mechinaud F, Galambrun C, Ben Romdhane N, Isidor B, Philip N, Derain-Court J, Cassinat B, Lachenaud J, Kaltenbach S, et al: Germline mutations of the CBL gene define a new genetic syndrome with predisposition to juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemia. J Med Genet. 47:686–691. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

65 

Aoki Y, Niihori T, Banjo T, Okamoto N, Mizuno S, Kurosawa K, Ogata T, Takada F, Yano M, Ando T, et al: Gain-of-function mutations in RIT1 cause Noonan syndrome, a RAS/MAPK pathway syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 93:173–180. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Shah KN: The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules. Pediatr Clin North Am. 57:1131–1153. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2016
Volume 14 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang J, Li M and Yao Z: Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review). Mol Med Rep 14: 4023-4029, 2016.
APA
Zhang, J., Li, M., & Yao, Z. (2016). Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review). Molecular Medicine Reports, 14, 4023-4029. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5760
MLA
Zhang, J., Li, M., Yao, Z."Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review)". Molecular Medicine Reports 14.5 (2016): 4023-4029.
Chicago
Zhang, J., Li, M., Yao, Z."Molecular screening strategies for NF1-like syndromes with café-au-lait macules (Review)". Molecular Medicine Reports 14, no. 5 (2016): 4023-4029. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5760