RGR variants in different forms of retinal diseases: The undetermined role of truncation mutations
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 13, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2016.5847
- Pages: 4811-4815
Abstract
Introduction
Retinal G protein coupled receptor (RGR) [Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (MIM) 600342)] encodes a putative retinal G-protein coupled receptor, a rhodopsin homologue, expressed exclusively in the retina (1–3). RGR is essential for the visual cycle as it is involved in the production of 11-cis-retinal (4). An abnormal visual cycle affects visual perception and ultimately leads to ocular disorders (5). However, the association of RGR with specific ocular diseases has been rarely reported. Only a homozygous missense mutation and a heterozygous frameshift mutation have been reported to be associated with retinitis pigmentosa and choroidal sclerosis, respectively (5). However, the involvement of RGR in the pathogenesis of retinitis pigmentosa has not been implicated in subsequent studies (6,7). The potential role of RGR in retinal diseases remains to be elucidated. Thus, the present study aims to systemically evaluate and analyze the potential role and pathogenicity of variants in RGR. This will be done with reference to a whole exome sequencing dataset from 820 probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases.
Materials and methods
Patients
The present study is part of a project to investigate genetic defects associated with genetic ocular diseases using whole exome sequencing. Whole exome sequencing was performed on samples from 820 probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases. All patients were recruited from the clinic of the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (Guangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their guardians, following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The present study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center.
Sequencing
Whole exome sequencing was performed using a SureSelect Human All Exon Enrichment kit V4 (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) or TruSeq Exome Enrichment Kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) as previously described (8,9). Variants in coding regions and splice sites in RGR were selected from the whole exome sequencing data of 820 probands with various genetic ocular diseases. Those variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤0.01 were further analyzed by functional prediction using online methods, including SIFT (sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_enst_submit.html) (10), PolyPhen-2 (genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) (11), and Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project (www.fruitfly.org/) (12). The MAF of each variant was obtained from the public databases, dbSNP (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/), 1000 Genomes (www.1000genomes.org/), and the Exome Variation Server (evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/). Potential variants of RGR were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing and validated in available family members. Primers used for amplification of fragments were designed using the Primer3 online tool (bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/) and are presented in Table I. The methods used for amplification, sequencing, and analysis of the target fragments were as previously described (13). The descriptions of the variants are consistent with the nomenclature for sequence variations (www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/) (14).
Results
Following a review of the whole exome dataset of 820 probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases, a total of 5 variants of RGR were detected in 6 of the 820 probands. Of the five variants, two were heterozygous truncation variants, c.266C>A (p.S89*) and c.722_723delCC (p.S242Yfs*29), identified in two probands with early-onset high myopia (Fig. 1A and Table II). These two variants were further confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1A). Segregation analysis on available family relatives identified that p.S89* and p.S242Yfs*2 did not co-segregate with high myopia, they were present in the unaffected relatives but absent in the affected relatives (Fig. 1A). The other three variants were heterozygous missense variants and identified in four probands, one with high myopia, one with cone-rod dystrophy, and two with Leber congenital amaurosis (Table II). No homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in RGR were detected.
Table II.Summary of variants in RGR detected in probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases. |
The two probands with RGR truncation variants complained of poor vision at younger than primary school age, but denied photophobia and night blindness (Table III). Fundus examination demonstrated tigroid fundus and temporal crescent of optic nerve head (Fig. 1B and C), which was consistent with the diagnosis of high myopia. Neither marked retinal vessel attenuation nor bone corpuscle type of pigmentation were observed (Fig. 1B and C). However, additional family members with RGR truncation variants (HM723II4 and HM824I1) were unaffected individuals without high myopia (Table III) and did not have any notable signs of abnormal fundus changes (Fig. 1D).
Discussion
Based on the whole exome sequencing dataset from 820 probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases, two heterozygous truncation variants in RGR were identified in two probands with high myopia, but these did not co-segregate with high myopia. The other three variants in RGR were heterozygous missense variants, and occurred randomly in four patients with different forms of genetic ocular diseases. No homozygous or compound heterozygous variants were detected in RGR.
Only a limited number of RGR variants have been previously reported (5–7). Among them, only two have been identified in two families with either retinitis pigmentosa or choroidal sclerosis (5), a homozygous c.196A>C (p.Ser66Arg) variant identified in a family with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa and a heterozygous c.824dupG (p.M275Ifs*83) insertion identified in a small family with autosomal dominant choroidal sclerosis (5). Subsequently, screening of RGR in two independent studies only identified a number of less likely pathogenic variants and polymorphisms, as reviewed in Table IV. Of the five variants detected in the current study, two were heterozygous novel truncations, p.S89* and p.S242Yfs*29, which presented in two probands with high myopia. These two variants and the previously reported heterozygous variant, c.824dupG, were located in exon 3, exon 6, and exon 7 of RGR, respectively, and have been predicted to result in an abnormal transcript. They were absent in the Exome Variants Server and 1000 Genomes databases. However, the p.S89* and p.S242Yfs*29 variants were also detected in unaffected family members without any abnormalities of the fundus. Furthermore, searching of the Exome Variants Server and 1000 Genomes databases revealed a further five truncation variants of RGR, c.190G>A (p.W47*) in 1/4406 alleles, c.775del1 (p.M260Wfs*43) in 99/12,518 alleles, c.775A>T (p.K259*) in 2/13,006 alleles, c.796_797insCC (p.I267Pfs*37) in 1/12,518 alleles, and c.877C>T (p.R293*) in 1/13,006 alleles. These findings suggest that heterozygous truncation variants of RGR are less likely to be pathogenic. Furthermore, it has been observed that heterozygous missense variants of RGR have a similar distribution among probands with different forms of genetic ocular diseases and thus, may not be pathogenic. The pathogenicity of the homozygous or compound variants of RGR, remains to be elucidated, as no such variants were detected in the current study.
In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that the potential role of heterozygous truncation of RGR in ocular diseases remains to be determined. Additional studies are required to provide further understanding.
Acknowledgements
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. U1201221), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (grant no. S2013030012978), and the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (grant no. 2012PI01).
References
Jiang M, Pandey S and Fong HK: An opsin homologue in the retina and pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 34:3669–3678. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shen D, Jiang M, Hao W, Tao L, Salazar M and Fong HK: A human opsin-related gene that encodes a retinaldehyde-binding protein. Biochemistry. 33:13117–13125. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Trifunovic D, Karali M, Camposampiero D, Ponzin D, Banfi S and Marigo V: A high-resolution RNA expression atlas of retinitis pigmentosa genes in human and mouse retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 49:2330–2336. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen P, Lee TD and Fong HK: Interaction of 11-cis-retinol dehydrogenase with the chromophore of retinal g protein-coupled receptor opsin. J Biol Chem. 276:21098–21104. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morimura H, Saindelle-Ribeaudeau F, Berson EL and Dryja TP: Mutations in RGR, encoding a light-sensitive opsin homologue, in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Genet. 23:393–394. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bernal S, Calaf M, Garcia-Hoyos M, Garcia-Sandoval B, Rosell J, Adan A, Ayuso C and Baiget M: Study of the involvement of the RGR, CRPB1, and CRB1 genes in the pathogenesis of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa. J Med Genet. 40:e892003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ksantini M, Sénéchal A, Bocquet B, Meunier I, Brabet P and Hamel CP: Screening genes of the visual cycle RGR, RBP1 and RBP3 identifies rare sequence variations. Ophthalmic Genet. 31:200–204. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang X, Li M, Guo X, Li S, Xiao X, Jia X, Liu X and Zhang Q: Mutation analysis of seven known glaucoma-associated genes in Chinese patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 55:3594–3602. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li J, Jiang D, Xiao X, Li S, Jia X, Sun W, Guo X and Zhang Q: Evaluation of 12 myopia-associated genes in Chinese patients with high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56:722–729. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar P, Henikoff S and Ng PC: Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc. 4:1073–1081. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Flanagan SE, Patch AM and Ellard S: Using SIFT and PolyPhen to predict loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 14:533–537. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reese MG, Eeckman FH, Kulp D and Haussler D: Improved splice site detection in Genie. J Comput Biol. 4:311–323. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jiang D, Li J, Xiao X, Li S, Jia X, Sun W, Guo X and Zhang Q: Detection of mutations in LRPAP1, CTSH, LEPREL1, ZNF644, SLC39A5, and SCO2 in 298 families with early-onset high myopia by exome sequencing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56:339–345. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
den Dunnen JT and Antonarakis SE: Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: A discussion. Hum Mutat. 15:7–12. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |