Open Access

Staphylococcus aureus Protein A induces osteoclastogenesis via the NF‑κB signaling pathway

  • Authors:
    • Li‑Rong Ren
    • Hai Wang
    • Xiao‑Qing He
    • Mu‑Guo Song
    • Xue‑Qiu Chen
    • Yong‑Qing Xu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: August 22, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7316
  • Pages: 6020-6028
  • Copyright: © Ren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most common organism causing osteomyelitis, and Staphylococcus aureus protein A (SpA) is an important virulence factor anchored in its cell wall. However, the precise mechanisms underlying the bone loss caused by SpA have not been well understood. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of SpA on osteoclast differentiation, and the probable mechanism was investigated. Raw264.7 cells were treated with SpA in the absence or presence of receptor‑activated (NF)‑κB ligand for 5 days, and morphological and biochemical assays were used to assess osteoclastogenesis and explore the underlying mechanisms. Data demonstrated that SpA induced osteoclast differentiation and promoted bone resorption in a dose‑dependent manner in the absence or presence of RANKL. In addition, the expression of osteoclast‑specific genes, such as the tartrate resistant acid phosphatase, matrix metalloproteinase‑9, cathepsin K, calcitonin receptors and d2 isoform of the vacuolar ATPase Vo domain, were enhanced by SpA. Furthermore, the SpA‑induced osteoclast differentiation was associated with the degradation of inhibitor of κB‑α, phosphorylation of NF‑κB p65 and increased expression of nuclear factor of activated T‑cells. However, by treatment with JSH‑23, an NF‑κB inhibitor, the formation of osteoclast‑like cells and resorption pits was significantly reduced, and the expression of osteoclast‑specific genes was also inhibited. Collectively, in the present study SpA induced osteoclast differentiation, promoted bone resorption, and the NF‑κB signaling pathway was involved in this process.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the most common causative organism in osteomyelitis (1,2), which is characterized by severe inflammation and progressive bone destruction (3). S. aureus infection often causes excessive bone destruction and leads to the formation of bone defect (4,5). However, the precise mechanisms underlying the bone loss caused by S. aureus infection is not well understood.

Bone is a dynamic organ that is constantly remodeled throughout life, and this physiological process is tightly regulated by osteoblasts (mediating bone formation) and osteoclasts (mediating bone resorption) (6). The balance between bone formation and bone resorption serves a great role in the maintenance of bone shape and mineralization (7). However, under the condition of bone infection, the balance is destroyed, and because of this, much research on the mechanism of bone defect infected by S. aureus focuses on bone formation (8). It is clear that S. aureus suppresses osteogenic differentiation of marrow mesenchymal stem cells (9) and inhibits osteoblast proliferation (10). In addition, S. aureus can be internalized by osteoblast (11,12) and subsequently induces osteoblast death (13). However, with respect to the bone resorption, previous studies have demonstrated that the surface-associated material (SAM) (14) and Surface-Associated Proteins (15,16) of S. aureus stimulate osteoclast formation and enhance bone resorption, but the active moiety in the SAM is unknown.

Mature osteoclasts are multinucleated cells, deriving from hematopoietic cells of the monocyte/macrophage family (17). Current studies have demonstrated that macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor (NF)-κB ligand (RANKL) serves an important role in the process of osteoclast differentiation. M-CSF promotes the survival of osteoclast precursors and osteoclasts (18,19) and induces RANK expression in osteoclast precursors (20). While RANKL is a key osteoclastogenic cytokine, the binding of RANKL to its receptor RANK recruits tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6, resulting in the activation of NF-κB, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)/Akt, p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (21), which are involved in the activation of c-Fos, activator protein 1 (AP-1), microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) and PU.1 (22). In the nucleus, the recruitment of activated NF-κB and nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFATc) 2 in the promoter of NFATc1 initiates the early activation of NFATc1, which subsequently complexes with MITF, AP-1, PU.1 and cAMP response element-binding protein to induce the expression of osteoclast-specific genes (23), such as acid-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), cathepsin K, calcitonin receptors (CTR), d2 isoform of the vacuolar ATPase Vo domain (Atp6v0d2) and β3 integrin (23).

Staphylococcus aureus protein A (SpA) which is expressed by the majority of S. aureus is an important virulence factor anchored in the staphylococcal cell wall (24), which interacts with a large number of human immunoglobulins and exists in a membrane-associated and secreted form. It is reported that when SpA binds to osteoblasts it induces cell apoptosis and death (13,25,26) inhibiting bone formation and mineralization (10,27). However, the direct effect of SpA on osteoclasts has not been reported. In the present study, the effect of SpA on osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption was investigated and the underlying mechanisms was explored for the first time, to the best of our knowledge. Results demonstrated that SpA induced osteoclast differentiation and promoted bone resorption in the absence and presence of RANKL, and that the NF-κB signaling pathway serves an important role in this process.

Materials and methods

Materials

The SpA was purchased from Sino Biological (Beijing, China); fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA); penicillin-streptomycin solution and high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) were purchased from HyClone; GE Healthcare (Chicago, IL, USA). Soluble RANKL was obtained from R&D Systems Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA); JSH-23 was from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA); acid phosphatase leukocyte kit (TRAP, 387A) and methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). A GeneJET RNA purification kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.; A PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNase H Plus) were purchased from Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Oligonucleotide primer sets were synthesized by Augct DNA-Syn Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Antibodies against ERK1/2 (cat. no. 9926), p38 (cat. no. 9926), JNK (cat. no. 9926), NF-κB p65 (cat. no. 8242), inhibitor of κB-α (IκB-α; cat. no. 4812), protein kinase (Akt; cat. no. 4691), GAPDH (cat. no. 8884) and NFATc1 (cat. no. 8032), or the phosphorylated form of p38 (cat. no. 9910), ERK1/2 (cat. no. 9910), JNK (cat. no. 9910), Akt (cat. no. 4060), and NF-κB p65 (cat. no. 3033) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA USA); Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent horseradish peroxidase (HRP) Substrate and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes were purchased from Merck KGaA. A mouse tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α SimpleStep ELISA® kit (cat. no. ab208348), an interleukin-1 (IL)-1α mouse in vitro SimpleStep ELISA™ kit (cat. no. ab199076), and an IL-6 mouse ELISA kit (cat. no. ab46100) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).

Cell culture

The Raw264.7 mouse monocytes/macrophage cell line (TIB-71; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was used as osteoclast precursors, which can differentiate into osteoclast-like cells in the presence of RANKL (28). The cells were grown in high-glucose DMEM, supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 at 37°C; media were changed every 3 days.

Cell viability assay (MTT assay)

Raw264.7 cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well with 10 replicates in each group and cultured for 24 h. Cells were induced with SpA (concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1,600 ng/ml) and equal volume of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) alone, as control for 1, 3 and 5 days; media and stimuli were changed every 3 days. After culturing for the above indicated days, 10 µl MTT solution was added to the cells and cells were incubated at 37°C for 4 h away from light. Subsequently, media were removed, and 100 µl dimethyl sulfoxide was added to the plates and cells were agitated at room temperature for 10 min. Subsequently, the optical density (OD) values of every well were detected with a Model 680 Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) at 570 nm.

In vitro osteoclastogenetic assays

To differentiate into osteoclasts, Raw264.7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1×104 cells/well with 5 duplicates in each group and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. Subsequently cells were stimulated with SpA (concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng/ml), SpA + RANKL (50 ng/ml), SpA+JSH-23 (20 µM), RANKL (100 ng/ml) or equal volumes of PBS (control) at 37°C for 5 days; media and stimuli were replaced every 3 days. Following this, cells were fixed and stained using the TRAP staining kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. All cells in every well were counted, and TRAP-positive multi-nucleated (≥3 nuclei) cells were counted as osteoclast-like cells.

Bone resorption assay

Raw264.7 cells were seeded in 24-well Corning® Osteo Assay Surface Multiple Well Plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 5×104 cells/well with 4 duplicates in each group and cultured at 37°C for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were stimulated with SpA (concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng/ml), SpA+ RANKL (50 ng/ml), SpA+JSH-23 (20 µM), RANKL (100 ng/ml) and equal volumes of PBS (control) for 5 days; media and stimuli were changed every 3 days. After 5 days, media and cells were removed, and the areas of resorption pits were imaged by an inverted microscope and analyzed with Scion image software version 4.0.3.2 (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD, USA).

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Raw264.7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1×105 cells/well and cultured for 24 h. Subsequently, cells were stimulated with SpA (concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 ng/ml), SpA+ RANKL (50 ng/ml), RANKL (100 ng/ml) or equal volumes of PBS (control) for 5 days; media and stimuli were changed every 3 days. After 5 days, cells were harvested and total RNA was isolated with a GeneJET RNA purification kit according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the concentration of total RNA was measured with a micro spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., NanoDrop 2000). Total RNA of 500 ng was used to synthesize cDNA by reverse transcription using PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser. PCR was performed in a CFX96 Real-time system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) with a SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™. Reactions were initiated by incubation at 94°C for 5 min, and PCR [94°C for 30 sec, 60°C (58°C for GAPDH) for 34 sec, 72°C for 30 sec] was performed for 40 cycles; all reactions were performed in triplicate. Relative quantities of the tested genes were normalized to GAPDH, and the normalized data were expressed using the comparative 2−ΔΔCq method (29). Primers used in this study are presented in Table I.

Table I.

Primer sequences used in this study.

Table I.

Primer sequences used in this study.

Target geneForward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)
TRAP GCGACCATTGTTAGCCACATACG CGTTGATGTCGCACAGAGGGAT
MMP9 GCTGACTACGATAAGGACGGCA GCGGCCCTCAAAGATGAACGG
Cathepsin K AGCAGAACGGAGGCATTGACTC TTTAGCTGCCTTTGCCGTGGC
Calcitonin receptor TGGTGCGGCGGGATCCTATAAGT AGCGTAGGCGTTGCTCGTCG
ATP6v0d2 ACGGTGATGTCACAGCAGACGT CCTCTGGATAGAGCCTGCCGCA
GAPDH CCCAGAAGACTGTGGATGG CAGATTGGGGGTAGGAACAC

[i] TRAP, acid-resistant acid phosphatase; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ATP6v0d2, d2 isoform of the vacuolar ATPase Vo domain.

Western blot analysis

Raw264.7 cells were cultured in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks; when cells reached 80% confluency, the culture medium was replaced, and cells were cultured at 37°C for another 1 h in the cell incubator. Following that, cells were stimulated with SpA (400 ng/ml) for 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 and 60 min, and for NFATc1 measurement, Raw264.7 cells were treated with SpA (400 ng/ml) or JSH-23+ SpA (400 ng/ml) for 0, 1, 2 and 3 days. At the indicated time point, cells were harvested and lysed using high efficiency tissue/cell lysis solution (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co, Ltd., Beijing, China), and were followed by centrifugation at 4°C and 13,800 × g for 15 min, proteins in the supernatant were collected. Subsequently, protein concentrations were measured by Bicinchoninic Acid protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China), and protein samples were mixed with the sample buffer and boiled at 95°C for 5 min. Following that, protein samples (20 µg) were loaded onto 8–12% polyacrylamide gels, transferred to PVDF membranes and subsequently blocked with 5% skimmed milk or bovine serum albumin (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co, Ltd., Beijing, China)-TBS (0.05% Tween-20) for 1 h. Following that, membranes were probed with specific antibodies against total ERK1/2 (1:1,000), p38 (1:1,000), JNK (1:1,000), NF-κB p65 (1:1,000), IκB-α (1:500), Akt (1:1,000), GAPDH (1:2,000) and NFATc1 (1:1,000), or the phosphorylated form of p38 (1:1,000), ERK1/2 (1:1,000), JNK (1:1,000), Akt (1:1,000) and NF-κB p65 (1:1,000), and were incubated at 4°C for 12 h. Detection was carried out using a HRP-linked rabbit IgG antibody (cat. no. 7074; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA USA) at room temperature for 1 h, followed by an enhanced chemiluminescence western blotting detection reagent at room temperature for 1 min. Densitometry of the blots were performed using the Bio-Rad Universal Hood 2 Electrophoresis Imaging Cabinet (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.), and were analyzed by Bio-Rad Image Lab Software version 5.2.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed in triplicate and similar results were obtained. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform the statistical analysis, and the statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by the Least Significant Difference/Student-Newman-Keuls test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Effect of SpA on cell viability

The cytotoxic effect of SpA on the Raw264.7cells was measured by MTT assay. As depicted in Fig. 1, SpA promoted cell proliferation on the first day under the concentration of 100–400 ng/ml, but this effect disappeared on days 3 and 5. Overall, SpA had no cytotoxicity to Raw264.7 cells below the concentration of 800 ng/ml. However, when the concentration was raised to 1,600 ng/ml, the cell proliferation activity was significantly inhibited. Since SpA did not show any toxic effect on cell viability up to 800 ng/ml, concentrations of 50–800 ng/ml were used in the following experiments.

SpA induces the formation of osteoclast-like cells from RAW264.7 cells in the absence or presence of RANKL

SpA is an important virulence factor of S. aureus, the effect of SpA on osteoclast differentiation was explored. Raw264.7cells were grown in 96-well plates and stimulated with various concentrations of SpA in the absence or presence of RANKL for 5 days. SpA significantly promoted the formation of osteoclast-like cells in a dose-dependent manner in the absence of RANKL, but the number of osteoclast-like cells formed was lower than that of RANKL -induced (Fig. 2A and B). As reported previously, Raw264.7 cells stimulated by RANKL alone could differentiate into mature osteoclasts (28), however, Staphylococcal lipoteichoic acid, another virulence factor of S. aureus, inhibits osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL (30). Therefore, the induction effect of SpA on osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL was also examined (Fig. 2A). However, SpA did not inhibit the formation of osteoclast-like cells in the presence of RANKL, and the number of osteoclast-like cells was higher than that without RANKL under the same concentration (Fig. 2B), which indicated that RANKL enhanced the promotion effect of SpA on osteoclast differentiation. In addition, when treated with JSH-23, an inhibitor of NF-κB activation, the formation of osteoclast-like cells induced by SpA was inhibited (Fig. 2).

SpA promotes the formation of resorption pits in the absence or presence of RANKL

Since SpA promoted the formation of osteoclast-like cells derived from Raw264.7 cells, and bone resorption is the feature that identifies mature osteoclasts (31), the bone resorption activity of osteoclast-like cells induced by SpA from Raw264.7 cells was evaluated next. In the bone resorption assay, Raw264.7 cells were grown in COAS plates and stimulated with various concentrations of SpA and RANKL for 5 days. As illustrated in Fig. 3, SpA induced the formation of resorption pits in a dose-dependent manner in the absence or presence of RANKL (Fig. 3A and B), and the area of resorption pits with RANKL were higher than that without RANKL under the same SpA concentration (200, 400 and 800 ng/ml; Fig. 3B). However, when treated with JSH-23, the formation of resorption pits induced by SpA was decreased (Fig. 3). Collectively, these results suggested that SpA induced the formation of osteoclasts with bone resorption activity, and this effect was inhibitedby JSH-23.

SpA increases the mRNA expression levels of osteoclast-specific genes in Raw264.7 cells

Osteoclasts originated from hematopoietic cells of the monocyte/macrophage family (17), and Raw264.7 cells have been demonstrated to differentiate into mature osteoclasts treated with RANKL alone (17,32). mRNA expression levels of osteoclast-specific genes, such as TRAP, MMP-9, cathepsin K, CTR and Atp6v0d2 were measured. As demonstrated in Fig. 4, SpA increased the mRNA expression levels of TRAP, MMP-9, cathepsin K, CTR and Atp6v0d2 in a dose-dependent manner, and these expression levels were higher in the presence of RANKL rather than when treated with SpA alone. However, when JSH-23 was added, the mRNA expression levels of osteoclast-specific genes induced by SpA were inhibited (Fig. 4).

NF-κB signaling pathway holds a role in SpA-induced osteoclast differentiation

It was reported that, three mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; including p38, ERK and JNK) (33), NF-κB (21,34) and PI-3K/Akt (23,35) signaling pathways have been involved in osteoclast differentiation. To elucidate the signaling pathways by which SpA promoted osteoclast differentiation, the protein expression of NFATc1 and the above-mentioned signaling pathways was measured in Raw264.7 cells stimulated by SpA. As illustrated in Fig. 5, the degradation of IκBα occurred 10 min after SpA treatment (Fig. 5A and B), while the phosphorylation of NF-κB increased markedly at 5 and 10 min (Fig. 5A and C). Furthermore, proteins in the signaling pathways of Akt and MAPKs showed no obvious change when treated with SpA (Fig. 5A). Because of this, the culture medium was supplemented with JSH-23, which is an inhibitor of NF-κB (36,37). Subsequently, Raw264.7 cells were treated with SpA and the formation of osteoclast-like cells and resorption pits was decreased; the expression levels of osteoclast-specific genes were inhibited too, which indicated that NF-κB signaling pathway was involved in the SpA-induced osteoclast differentiation (Fig. 5A and C).

NFATc1 is an important transcription factor in osteoclast differentiation; the induction of NFATc1 is a hallmark in the cell terminal determination of osteoclasts (38,39); and its presence in osteoclast precursors could promote their differentiation into mature osteoclasts in the absence of RANKL (39). Thus, the expression of NFATc1 in Raw264.7 cells treated with SpA for 1, 2 and 3 days was examined, and the results demonstrated that SpA significantly promoted the expression of NFATc1 on days 2 and 3 (Fig. 5D and E), but JSH-23 inhibited the expression of NFATc1 induced by SpA. These findings suggested that SpA may induce osteoclast differentiation through NF-κB activation, which subsequently activates NFATc1 determining osteoclast differentiation.

Discussion

In the present study, the effect of SpA on osteoclastogenesis and the potential underlying mechanisms were investigated. It was identified that SpA induced osteoclast differentiation, promoted bone resorption and increased the expression of osteoclast-specific genes, such as TRAP, MMP-9, cathepsin K, CTR and ATP6v0d2, in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, the effect of SpA-induced osteoclastogenesis was enhanced in the presence of RANKL. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the NF-κB signaling pathway may serve a role in SpA-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Raw264.7 cells express RANK and can differentiate into mature osteoclasts induced by RANKL (32), and therefore, serve an important role in studies of osteoclast formation and function in vitro (40). This is why Raw264.7 cells were chosen in this study as osteoclast precursors. However, Mendoza Bertelli et al (41) obtained osteoclast precursors by using M-CSF to induce bone marrow cells from BALB/c, C57BL/6 or tnfr1−/−mice, which is another method of obtaining osteoclast precursors. They obtained a similar result, where SpA induced osteoclast differentiation and promoted bone resorption. However, Staphylococcal lipoteichoic acid, another toxic component of the cell wall of S. aureus, inhibited osteoclast differentiation in the presence of RANKL (30). This phenomenon may be associated with the different receptors and structures of these two virulence factors. Lipoteichoic acid is recognized by toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 (42), and stimulation by TLRs inhibits osteoclast differentiation (43), but SpA can bind to a variety of ligands, such as the TNF receptor-1 (TNFR-1) (44), the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (45) and Fc region of IgG (46), and different ligands may trigger different intracellular signaling pathways. Furthermore, Trouillet-Assant et al (47) have demonstrated that live S. aureus inhibits osteoclastogenesis. In their studies, murine bone marrow cells were infected with live S. aureus only for 2 h, then the cells were induced with M-CSF and RANK-L and differentiated into activated macrophages instead of osteoclasts. This result may have been as a result of a too short infection time and with the extension of infection time, live S. aureus may promote osteoclast formation. In addition, although mature osteoclasts are derived from hematopoietic cells, they can be directly differentiated from the monocyte/macrophage family. This means that if they had treated bone marrow cells with M-CSF to obtain monocytes and infected them with live S. aureus after that, different conclusions may have been obtained. Furthermore, in the present study, although SpA induced the formation of osteoclast with bone resorption activity, compared with RANKL, the induction effect was weaker, because the formed number of osteoclast-like cells and the area of resorption pits stimulated with SpA were lower than those treated with RANKL, which emphasizes that, RANKL, may be a necessary and sufficient cytokine, serving a great role in osteoclast differentiation.

In the present study, it was demonstrated that the degradation of IκB-α and phosphorylation of NF-κB in Raw264.7 cells occurred under the stimulation of SpA, but proteins in MAPKs and PI-3 K signaling pathways presented no obvious change, which indicated that the NF-κB signaling pathway might be involved in SpA-induced osteoclast differentiation. Additionally, JSH-23 was used to inhibit NF-κB activation, and it was identified that the formation of osteoclast-like cells and resorption pits induced by SpA was obviously decreased, and the expression of osteoclast-specific genes (TRAP, MMP-9, cathepsin K, CTR and ATP6v0d2) were inhibited too, which confirmed that the NF-κB signaling pathway was involved in the SpA-induced osteoclast differentiation. As reported previously, NFATc1 serves a decisive role in the terminal differentiation of osteoclasts (39), and NF-κB induces the initial activation of NFATc1 (39), which evokes the auto-amplification of NFATc1 and determines its sufficient role in osteoclast differentiation (48). Therefore, the expression of NFATc1 was measured and it was demonstrated that its high expression occurred 2 and 3 days after SpA stimulation. However, when JSH-23 was added, the expression of NFATc1 was decreased, which suggested that SpA promotes osteoclast differentiation by activating the NF-κB signaling pathway, which subsequently activates NFATc1 and induces osteoclast differentiation. As Mendoza Bertelli et al (41) mentioned, SpA induces osteoclastogenesis via TNFR1 and EGFR, whereas Claro et al (26) demonstrated that SpA binding to TNFR-1 activates NF-κB and induces the release of IL-6, and Yi et al (49) demonstrated that EGFR cross-talks with RANK to induce osteoclast differentiation. Based on the above studies, whether SpA activates NF-κB by TNFR-1 and EGFR, and then activates NFATc1, which subsequently promotes osteoclast differentiation, requires further experimentation.

In conclusion, the present study indicated that SpA induces osteoclast differentiation and promotes bone resorption in vitro, that the NF-κB signaling pathway serves a role in this process, and that these findings provide a molecular basis in order to understand the pathogenesis of S. aureus-mediated osteomyelitis.

Acknowledgements

The present study was funded by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (grant no. 81472096).

References

1 

Jorge LS, Chueire AG and Rossit AR: Osteomyelitis: A current challenge. Braz J Infect Dis. 14:310–315. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Lew DP and Waldvogel FA: Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 364:369–379. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Klosterhalfen B, Peters KM, Tons C, Hauptmann S, Klein CL and Kirkpatrick CJ: Local and systemic inflammatory mediator release in patients with acute and chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis. J Trauma. 40:372–378. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Parsons B and Strauss E: Surgical management of chronic osteomyelitis. Am J Surg. 188 1A Suppl:S57–S66. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Giannoudis PV and Atkins R: Management of long-bone non-unions. Injury. 38 Suppl 2:S1–S2. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Feng X and McDonald JM: Disorders of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Pathol. 6:121–145. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Taichman RS: Blood and bone: Two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood. 105:2631–2639. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Josse J, Velard F and Gangloff SC: Staphylococcus aureus vs. Osteoblast: Relationship and consequences in osteomyelitis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 5:852015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Fiedler T, Salamon A, Adam S, Herzmann N, Taubenheim J and Peters K: Impact of bacteria and bacterial components on osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Cell Res. 319:2883–2892. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Jin T, Zhu YL, Li J, Shi J, He XQ, Ding J and Xu YQ: Staphylococcal protein A, Panton-Valentine leukocidin and coagulase aggravate the bone loss and bone destruction in osteomyelitis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 32:322–333. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Ellington JK, Reilly SS, Ramp WK, Smeltzer MS, Kellam JF and Hudson MC: Mechanisms of Staphylococcus aureus invasion of cultured osteoblasts. Microb Pathog. 26:317–323. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Hudson MC, Ramp WK, Nicholson NC, Williams AS and Nousiainen MT: Internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by cultured osteoblasts. Microb Pathog. 19:409–419. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Rasigade JP, Trouillet-Assant S, Ferry T, Diep BA, Sapin A, Lhoste Y, Ranfaing J, Badiou C, Benito Y, Bes M, et al: PSMs of hypervirulent Staphylococcus aureus act as intracellular toxins that kill infected osteoblasts. PLoS One. 8:e631762013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Lau YS, Wang W, Sabokbar A, Simpson H, Nair S, Henderson B, Berendt A and Athanasou NA: Staphylococcus aureus capsular material promotes osteoclast formation. Injury. 37 Suppl 2:S41–S48. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Meghji S, Crean SJ, Hill PA, Sheikh M, Nair SP, Heron K, Henderson B, Mawer EB and Harris M: Surface-associated protein from staphylococcus aureus stimulates osteoclastogenesis: Possible role in S. Aureus-induced bone pathology. Br J Rheumatol. 37:1095–1101. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Nair S, Song Y, Meghji S, Reddi K, Harris M, Ross A, Poole S, Wilson M and Henderson B: Surface-associated proteins from Staphylococcus aureus demonstrate potent bone resorbing activity. J Bone Miner Res. 10:726–734. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Boyle WJ, Simonet WS and Lacey DL: Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 423:337–342. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Woo KM, Kim HM and Ko JS: Macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes the survival of osteoclast precursors by up-regulating Bcl-X(L). Exp Mol Med. 34:340–346. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Fuller K, Owens JM, Jagger CJ, Wilson A, Moss R and Chambers TJ: Macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates survival and chemotactic behavior in isolated osteoclasts. J Exp Med. 178:1733–1744. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Arai F, Miyamoto T, Ohneda O, Inada T, Sudo T, Brasel K, Miyata T, Anderson DM and Suda T: Commitment and differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells by the sequential expression of c-Fms and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB (RANK) receptors. J Exp Med. 190:1741–1754. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Soysa NS, Alles N, Aoki K and Ohya K: Osteoclast formation and differentiation: An overview. J Med Dent Sci. 59:65–74. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Nakashima T and Takayanagi H: New regulation mechanisms of osteoclast differentiation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1240:E13–E18. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Shinohara M and Takayanagi H: Novel osteoclast signaling mechanisms. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 5:67–72. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Peacock SJ, Moore CE, Justice A, Kantzanou M, Story L, Mackie K, O'Neill G and Day NP: Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 70:4987–4996. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Tuchscherr L, Heitmann V, Hussain M, Viemann D, Roth J, von Eiff C, Peters G, Becker K and Löffler B: Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are adapted phenotypes for intracellular persistence. J Infect Dis. 202:1031–1040. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Claro T, Widaa A, McDonnell C, Foster TJ, O'Brien FJ and Kerrigan SW: Staphylococcus aureus protein A binding to osteoblast tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 results in activation of nuclear factor kappa B and release of interleukin-6 in bone infection. Microbiology. 159:147–154. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Claro T, Widaa A, O'Seaghdha M, Miajlovic H, Foster TJ, O'Brien FJ and Kerrigan SW: Staphylococcus aureus protein A binds to osteoblasts and triggers signals that weaken bone in osteomyelitis. PLoS One. 6:e187482011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Hsu H, Lacey DL, Dunstan CR, Solovyev I, Colombero A, Timms E, Tan HL, Elliott G, Kelley MJ, Sarosi I, et al: Tumor necrosis factor receptor family member RANK mediates osteoclast differentiation and activation induced by osteoprotegerin ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96:3540–3545. 1999; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Yang J, Ryu YH, Yun CH and Han SH: Impaired osteoclastogenesis by staphylococcal lipoteichoic acid through Toll-like receptor 2 with partial involvement of MyD88. J Leukoc Biol. 86:823–831. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Chambers TJ, Revell PA, Fuller K and Athanasou NA: Resorption of bone by isolated rabbit osteoclasts. J Cell Sci. 66:383–399. 1984.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT and Martin TJ: Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev. 20:345–357. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Matsuzaki K, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi K, Yasuda H, Shima N, Morinaga T, Toyama Y, Yabe Y, Higashio K and Suda T: Osteoclast differentiation factor (ODF) induces osteoclast-like cell formation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 246:199–204. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Jimi E, Akiyama S, Tsurukai T, Okahashi N, Kobayashi K, Udagawa N, Nishihara T, Takahashi N and Suda T: Osteoclast differentiation factor acts as a multifunctional regulator in murine osteoclast differentiation and function. J Immunol. 163:434–442. 1999.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Moon JB, Kim JH, Kim K, Youn BU, Ko A, Lee SY and Kim N: Akt induces osteoclast differentiation through regulating the GSK3β/NFATc1 signaling cascade. J Immunol. 188:163–169. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

He Q, Zhang C, Wang L, Zhang P, Ma D, Lv J and Liu F: Inflammatory signaling regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell emergence in vertebrates. Blood. 125:1098–1106. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

He L, Sun F, Wang Y, Zhu J, Fang J, Zhang S, Yu Q, Gong Q, Ren B, Xiang X, et al: HMGB1 exacerbates bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome via RAGE/NF-κB/HPSE signaling to enhance latent TGF-β release from ECM. Am J Transl Res. 8:1971–1984. 2016.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Asagiri M, Sato K, Usami T, Ochi S, Nishina H, Yoshida H, Morita I, Wagner EF, Mak TW, Serfling E and Takayanagi H: Autoamplification of NFATc1 expression determines its essential role in bone homeostasis. J Exp Med. 202:1261–1269. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Takayanagi H, Kim S, Koga T, Nishina H, Isshiki M, Yoshida H, Saiura A, Isobe M, Yokochi T, Inoue J, et al: Induction and activation of the transcription factor NFATc1 (NFAT2) integrate RANKL signaling in terminal differentiation of osteoclasts. Dev Cell. 3:889–901. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Collin-Osdoby P and Osdoby P: RANKL-mediated osteoclast formation from murine RAW 264.7 cells. Methods Mol Biol. 816:187–202. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Bertelli A Mendoza, Delpino MV, Lattar S, Giai C, Llana MN, Sanjuan N, Cassat JE, Sordelli D and Gómez MI: Staphylococcus aureus protein A enhances osteoclastogenesis via TNFR1 and EGFR signaling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1862:1975–1983. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Ellingsen E, Morath S, Flo T, Schromm A, Hartung T, Thiemermann C, Espevik T, Golenbock D, Foster D, Solberg R, et al: Induction of cytokine production in human T cells and monocytes by highly purified lipoteichoic acid: Involvement of Toll-like receptors and CD14. Med Sci Monit. 8:BR149–BR156. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

43 

Takami M, Kim N, Rho J and Choi Y: Stimulation by toll-like receptors inhibits osteoclast differentiation. J Immunol. 169:1516–1523. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Gómez MI, O'Seaghdha M, Magargee M, Foster TJ and Prince AS: Staphylococcus aureus protein A activates TNFR1 signaling through conserved IgG binding domains. J Biol Chem. 281:20190–20196. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Gómez MI, Seaghdha MO and Prince AS: Staphylococcus aureus protein A activates TACE through EGFR-dependent signaling. EMBO J. 26:701–709. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Cedergren L, Andersson R, Jansson B, Uhlén M and Nilsson B: Mutational analysis of the interaction between staphylococcal protein A and human IgG1. Protein Eng. 6:441–448. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Trouillet-Assant S, Gallet M, Nauroy P, Rasigade JP, Flammier S, Parroche P, Marvel J, Ferry T, Vandenesch F, Jurdic P and Laurent F: Dual impact of live Staphylococcus aureus on the osteoclast lineage, leading to increased bone resorption. J Infect Dis. 211:571–581. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Zhao Q, Wang X, Liu Y, He A and Jia R: NFATc1: Functions in osteoclasts. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 42:576–579. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Yi T, Lee HL, Cha JH, Ko SI, Kim HJ, Shin HI, Woo KM, Ryoo HM, Kim GS and Baek JH: Epidermal growth factor receptor regulates osteoclast differentiation and survival through cross-talking with RANK signaling. J Cell Physiol. 217:409–422. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 16 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ren LR, Wang H, He XQ, Song MG, Chen XQ and Xu YQ: Staphylococcus aureus Protein A induces osteoclastogenesis via the NF‑κB signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 16: 6020-6028, 2017.
APA
Ren, L., Wang, H., He, X., Song, M., Chen, X., & Xu, Y. (2017). Staphylococcus aureus Protein A induces osteoclastogenesis via the NF‑κB signaling pathway. Molecular Medicine Reports, 16, 6020-6028. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7316
MLA
Ren, L., Wang, H., He, X., Song, M., Chen, X., Xu, Y."Staphylococcus aureus Protein A induces osteoclastogenesis via the NF‑κB signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 16.5 (2017): 6020-6028.
Chicago
Ren, L., Wang, H., He, X., Song, M., Chen, X., Xu, Y."Staphylococcus aureus Protein A induces osteoclastogenesis via the NF‑κB signaling pathway". Molecular Medicine Reports 16, no. 5 (2017): 6020-6028. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7316