Open Access

Screening critical genes associated with malignant glioma using bioinformatics analysis

  • Authors:
    • Yonggang Xu
    • Jie Wang
    • Yanbin Xu
    • Hong Xiao
    • Jianhua Li
    • Zhi Wang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: September 12, 2017     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7471
  • Pages: 6580-6589
  • Copyright: © Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Malignant gliomas are high‑grade gliomas, which are derived from glial cells in the spine or brain. To examine the mechanisms underlying malignant gliomas in the present study, the expression profile of GSE54004, which included 12 grade II astrocytomas, 33 grade III astrocytomas and 98 grade IV astrocytomas, was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Using the Limma package in R, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in grade III, vs. grade II astrocytoma, grade IV, vs. grade II astrocytoma, and grade IV, vs. grade III astrocytoma were analyzed. Venn diagram analysis and enrichment analyses were performed separately for the DEGs using VennPlex software and the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. Protein‑protein interaction (PPI) networks were visualized using Cytoscape software, and subsequent module analysis of the PPI networks was performed using the ClusterONE tool. Finally, glioma‑associated genes and glioma marker genes among the DEGs were identified using the CTD database. A total of 27, 1,446 and 776 DEGs were screened for the grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III astrocytoma comparison groups, respectively. Functional enrichment analyses showed that matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and chitinase 3‑like 1 (CHI3L1) were enriched in the extracellular matrix and extracellular matrix structural constituent, respectively. In the PPI networks, annexin A1 (ANXA1) had a higher degree and MMP9 had interactions with vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA). There were 10 common glioma marker genes between the grade IV, vs. grade II and the grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups, including MMP9, CHI3L1, VEGFA and S100 calcium binding protein A4 (S100A4). This suggested that MMP9, CHI3L1, VEGFA, S100A4 and ANXA1 may be involved in the progression of malignant gliomas.

Introduction

As a type of tumor derived from glial cells in the spine or brain (1), gliomas account for ~80% of malignant brain tumors, and 30% of central nervous system and brain tumors (2). According to their histological features, gliomas are classified into astrocytomas, ependymomas, oligodendrogliomas, optic nerve gliomas, mixed gliomas and brainstem gliomas, among which astrocytomas are the common type of primary brain tumor among adults (3). Gliomas are also divided into low-grade gliomas (grade I and II) and high-grade gliomas (grade III and IV) according to the World Health Organization classification criteria (4). High grade gliomas are malignant gliomas comprising glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytomas, and the median overall survival rates of patients with glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytomas are ~15 months and 3 years, respectively (5). Therefore, elucidation of the mechanisms underlying malignant gliomas and the development of novel therapeutic strategies are urgently required.

Several studies have investigated the genes in involved in gliomas. In children with malignant gliomas, the overexpression of p53 is closely associated with adverse outcomes, independently of histological findings and clinical prognostic factors (6,7). As a critical mediator of the unfolded protein response, 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) is significantly upregulated in human malignant glioma and associated with its proliferation rate, suggesting that drugs capable of inhibiting GRP78 may be applied in the treatment of malignant glioma (8). Promoter methylation-induced silencing of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase DNA-repair gene contributes to longer survival rates in patients with glioblastoma who are treated with alkylating agents (9). A previous study demonstrated that the increased level of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) is critical for the activation of glioma cell motility through affecting molecules associated with invasion (10,11). The Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) soluble protein may be implicated in the immune evasion and progression of malignant gliomas through inhibiting CD95 ligand (CD95 L) (12). It has also been reported that the overexpression of Neuropilin 1 (NRP1) promotes tumor progression and is associated with poor prognosis in glioma (13). Spy1, which belongs to the Speedy/RINGO family, is correlated with the poor prognosis in patients with glioma and may serve as an independent prognostic predictor for patients with the disease (14). However, a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying gliomas is required.

In 2014, Guan et al used newly sequenced glioma datasets and downloaded glioma gene expression profiles to investigate the association between known molecular subtypes of grade IV glioblastoma (GBM) with grade II/III gliomas (GII/III), and found shared patterns between the GBMs and GII/IIIs (15). Using the data deposited by Guan et al (15), the present study further identified the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in three comparison groups (grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III), and their functions were predicted using enrichment analysis. Subsequently, protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were constructed and module analysis was performed to analyze the interactions among the DEGs. In addition, glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes among the DEGs were screened to identify the key genes implicated in malignant glioma.

Materials and methods

Microarray data

The gene expression profile of GSE54004, which was sequenced on the platform of GPL18281 Illumina HumanHT-12 WG-DASL V4.0 R2 expression beadchip (gene symbol version), was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/geo). To identify the key genes involved in the progression of malignant glioma, a total 143 samples were selected from the GSE54004 dataset, including 12 grade II astrocytomas, 33 grade III astrocytomas and 98 grade IV astrocytomas. The astrocytomas were collected from patients with glioma, following which the tissues were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) (15). The GSE54004 dataset was deposited by Guan et al (15), and this study by Guan et al (15) was approved by the Institutional Review Board of MD Anderson Cancer Center, with informed consent provided by all participants.

DEG screening

The downloaded gene expression files were merged to obtain a gene expression matrix. Using the Limma package (16) in R (version 3.22.7, http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/limma.html), the DEGs in three comparison groups (grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III) were analyzed. The thresholds of P<0.05 and |log2fold change (FC)|≥1 were used. VennPlex software (version 1.0.0.2; http://www.irp.nia.nih.gov/bioinformatics/vennplex.html) enables the screening of upregulated, downregulated or contraregulated individual factors between complex data sets (17). Venn diagram analysis was performed for the DEGs screened from different groups using VennPlex software (17) (version 1.0.0.2; http://www.irp.nia.nih.gov/bioinformatics/vennplex.html).

Functional and pathway enrichment analysis

Gene Ontology (GO; http://www.geneontology.org/) can be utilized to predict the potential functions for genes and their products in terms of molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC) and biological process (BP) (18). The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG; http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) database contains integrated knowledge of information regarding biochemical reactions and compounds, information on proteins and genes, and information on molecular interaction networks (19). GO functional and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed separately for the upregulated and downregulated genes in each comparison group, using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery software (DAVID version 6.7; http://www.david.niaid.nih.gov). Those terms involving at least two genes and with a P-value of P<0.05 were selected.

PPI network and module analyses

The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING version 10.0; http://string-db.org/) web resource and database contributes to the identification of PPIs, involving functional and physical associations (20). The PPI associations among the DEGs in each comparison group were searched using the STRING database (21), with a combined score (required confidence) >0.9. Following this, the PPI networks for the DEGs in each comparison group were visualized separately using Cytoscape software (version 3.2.0; http://www.cytoscape.org/) (22). In the PPI network, the degrees of nodes were determined by the number of edges involved, and nodes with higher degrees were determined as key nodes. Module analysis was also performed for the PPI networks using the ClusterONE tool (23).

Identification of glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD; http://ctdbase.org/) (24) collects gene-disease, chemical-disease and chemical-gene interactions, which are manually searched from scientific literature through strict text mining using structured notation, ontologies and controlled vocabularies. Combined with the CTD database, glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes among the DEGs screened for each group were analyzed.

Results

DEG analysis

With the thresholds of P<0.05 and |log2FC| ≥1, the DEGs in the three comparison groups were analyzed. Compared with grade II samples, a total of 27 DEGs (grade III, vs. grade II), including nine upregulated and 18 downregulated genes, were screened in the grade III samples. A total of 1,446 DEGs (grade IV, vs. grade II), including 643 upregulated and 803 downregulated genes, were identified in the grade IV samples. A total of 776 DEGs (grade IV, vs. grade III), including 410 upregulated and 366 downregulated genes, were identified in the grade IV samples relative to the grade III samples. There were more DEGs in the grade III and grade IV samples.

Venn diagram analysis showed that 20 DEGs, including five upregulated and 15 downregulated genes, were common genes between the grade III, vs. grade II and grade IV, vs. grade II comparison groups. In addition, 698 DEGs, including 356 upregulated and 342 downregulated genes, were common genes between the grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups (Fig. 1).

Functional and pathway enrichment analysis

No functions were enriched for the upregulated genes in the grade III, vs. grade II group. However, the downregulated genes in the grade III, vs. grade II group were significantly enriched in functions including synaptic transmission (GO_BP; P=8.06E-04) and plasma membrane (GO_CC; P=1.98E-02; Table I). No pathways were enriched for the DEGs in the grade III, vs. grade II group.

Table I.

Functions enriched for the downregulated genes in the grade III, vs. grade II group.

Table I.

Functions enriched for the downregulated genes in the grade III, vs. grade II group.

CategoryTermP-valueGenes (n)Gene symbol
BPGO:0007268~synaptic transmission8.06E-044NOS1, PCDHB4, UNC13C, HTR2A
GO:0019226~transmission of nerve impulse1.28E-034NOS1, PCDHB4, UNC13C, HTR2A
GO:0050877~neurological system process5.56E-035NOS1, PCDHB4, POU4F1, UNC13C, HTR2A
GO:0007267~cell-cell signaling5.97E-034NOS1, PCDHB4, UNC13C, HTR2A
GO:0043271~negative regulation of ion transport1.52E-022NOS1, HTR2A
GO:0007416~synaptogenesis2.11E-022PCDHB4, POU4F1
GO:0009408~response to heat3.67E-022NOS1, XYLT1
GO:0050808~synapse organization3.99E-022PCDHB4, POU4F1
CCGO:0005886~plasma membrane1.98E-028CAMKV, EPHB6, NOS1, PCDHB4, UNC13C, TMEM25, ABCC8, HTR2A

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; BP, biological process; CC, cellular component.

For the upregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade II group, functions including extracellular matrix organization (GO_BP; P=2.64E-17), extracellular matrix (GO_CC; P=2.90E-25), which involves matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9) and extracellular matrix structural constituent (GO_MF; P=4.83E-10), in addition to the systemic lupus erythematosus pathway (P=4.70E-16), were significantly enriched. For the downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade II group, functions including transmission of nerve impulse (GO_BP; P=1.12E-20), synapse (GO_CC; P=1.96E-21) and ion channel activity (GO_MF; P=1.35E-18), in addition to the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway (P=6.62E-07), were significantly enriched (Table II).

Table II.

Functions and pathways separately enriched for the upregulated and downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade II group.

Table II.

Functions and pathways separately enriched for the upregulated and downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade II group.

CategoryTermP-valueGenes (n)Gene symbol
Upregulated
BP GO:0030198~extracellular matrix organization2.64E-1729ADAMTS14, MMP9, LUM, COL3A1, ELN, POSTN, DCN, SERPINH1, TGFB2, TNFRSF11B…
GO:0009611~response to wounding2.31E-1561F2RL2, NRP1, S100A8, S100A9, C1QC, CXCL10, TGFB2, CD97, S1PR3, SAA2…
GO:0022403~cell cycle phase2.89E-1553KIF23, KIFC1, PRC1, PTTG1, GTSE1, CDKN2C, CDCA2, DNAJC2, CCNA2, SNHG3-RCC1…
CC GO:0031012~extracellular matrix2.90E-2562CTHRC1, LTBP1, NPNT, MMP9, MMP7, POSTN, MMP2, TGFB2, TNFRSF11B, TGFBI…
GO:0005576~extracellular region1.42E-23161F2RL2, CTHRC1, LTBP1, C9ORF47, FAM20A, MMP9, FAM20C, MMP7, TNFSF14, POSTN…
GO:0005578~proteinaceous extracellular matrix5.13E-2357CTHRC1, LTBP1, NPNT, MMP9, MMP7, POSTN, MMP2, TNFRSF11B, TGFBI, LOX…
MF GO:0005201~extracellular matrix structural constituent4.83E-1019COL4A2, COL4A1, LUM, ELN, COL3A1, CHI3L1, MGP, COL5A3, EMILIN2, COL5A2…
GO:0050840~extracellular matrix binding5.02E-1012BGN, TGFBI, C6ORF15, VEGFA, ELN, OLFML2A, NID1, DCN, THBS1, ADAM9…
GO:0030246~carbohydrate binding1.18E-0938CCL2, C21ORF63, CD248, SUSD2, HEXB, POSTN, DCN, MDK, SIGLEC9, HMMR…
Pathwayhsa05322: Systemic lupus erythematosus4.70E-1628HIST1H2AB, HIST4H4, HIST1H4L, HIST2H2AA4, HLA-DRB1, C1R, C1S, C1QC, HIST1H2BO, HIST1H2BM…
hsa04512: ECM-receptor interaction6.20E-1121COL4A2, COL4A1, TNC, COL3A1, ITGA1, HSPG2, ITGA3, COL5A3, COL5A2, COL5A1…
hsa04510: Focal adhesion5.34E-0929CAV2, CAV1, TNC, COL3A1, COL6A3, COL6A1, ZYX, PDGFD, LAMB1, THBS1…
Downregulated
BP GO:0019226~transmission of nerve impulse1.12E-2058SYT1, GABRB3, SYT4, GLRA3, CNP, GABBR2, KCNIP2, VIPR1, SLC1A4, KCNQ5…
GO:0007268~synaptic transmission1.47E-1952SYT1, GABRB3, SYT4, GLRA3, CNP, GABBR2, KCNIP2, VIPR1, SLC1A4, KCNQ5…
GO:0006811~ion transport2.91E-1579KCNC2, KCNH1, SLC22A17, SLC8A3, JPH4, JPH3, GABRB3, SCN3A, KCNAB1, SCN3B…
CC GO:0045202~synapse1.96E-2163SYT1, SEPT3, ENAH, CLSTN2, GABRB3, SYT4, GRIP1, GLRA3, GABRB1, SYT9…
GO:0044456~synapse part7.63E-1949SYT1, SYT4, GABRB3, CLSTN2, GRIP1, GABRB1, GLRA3, SYT9, GABBR2, GRIN3A…
GO:0043005~neuron projection2.24E-1248SNCG, SYT1, CDK5R1, CCK, ADCY2, SYT4, GABRB3, SNCB, ALDOC, GRIN3A…
MFGO:0005216~ion channel activity1.35E-1859KCNC2, KCNH1, SCN3A, GABRB3, KCNAB1, SCN3B, GLRA3, GABRB1, GRIN3A, KCNIP2…
GO:0015267~channel activity1.56E-1861KCNC2, KCNH1, SCN3A, GABRB3, KCNAB1, SCN3B, GLRA3, GABRB1, GRIN3A, KCNIP2…
GO:0022803~passive transmembrane transporter activity1.76E-1861KCNC2, KCNH1, SCN3A, GABRB3, KCNAB1, SCN3B, GLRA3, GABRB1, GRIN3A, KCNIP2…
Pathwayhsa04080: Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction6.62E-0728GPR83, THRA, PRLHR, GABRB3, GABRB1, DRD5, GLRA3, GRIN3A, GABBR2, VIPR1…
hsa04020: Calcium signaling pathway6.83E-0621SLC8A3, ADCY2, SLC8A2, NOS1, ADCY8, DRD5, GRIN1, CACNA1I, GRM1, ATP2B2…
hsa04360: Axon guidance2.96E-0313NGEF, PLXNB1, ABLIM3, NTN4, SLIT1, EPHB1, PAK7, EPHB6, SEMA6B, EPHA6…

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function.

For the upregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade III group, terms including extracellular matrix organization (GO_BP; P=9.69E-20), extracellular region part (GO_CC; P=5.11E-28), extracellular matrix structural constituent (GO_MF; P=3.47E-13), which involves chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1), and ECM-receptor interaction (P=1.35E-10) were significantly enriched. For the downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade III group, terms including transmission of nerve impulse (GO_BP; P=1.02E-14), synapse (GO_CC; P=4.37E-22), calcium ion binding (GO_MF; P=2.79E-13) and calcium signaling pathway (P=2.15E-05) were significantly enriched (Table III).

Table III.

Functions and pathways separately enriched for the upregulated and downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade III group.

Table III.

Functions and pathways separately enriched for the upregulated and downregulated genes in the grade IV, vs. grade III group.

CategoryTermP-valueGenes (n)Gene symbol
Upregulated
BP GO:0030198~extracellular matrix organization9.69E-2027IBSP, ADAMTS14, LUM, MMP9, COL3A1, POSTN, SERPINH1, TGFBI, BCL3, LOX…
GO:0001944~vasculature development1.06E-1534CAV1, NRP1, TNFRSF12A, COL3A1, ENPEP, TYMP, ACE, HOXA3, ANG, HMOX1…
GO:0043062~extracellular structure organization1.42E-1528IBSP, ADAMTS14, MMP9, LUM, COL3A1, POSTN, SERPINH1, TGFBI, BCL3, LOX…
CC GO:0044421~extracellular region part5.11E-2887CTHRC1, MMP9, IGFBP6, MMP7, TNFSF14, POSTN, HP, CXCL10, ISG15, SAA2…
GO:0031012~extracellular matrix3.40E-2652CTHRC1, MMP9, MMP7, POSTN, ANG, TGFBI, LOX, SPON2, VWA1, LOXL1…
GO:0005578~proteinaceous extracellular matrix6.96E-2650ADAMTS18, CTHRC1, ADAMTS14, CD248, MMP9, LUM, COL3A1, MMP7, POSTN, TIMP1…
MF GO:0005201~extracellular matrix structural constituent3.47E-1319COL18A1, COL4A2, COL4A1, LUM, EFEMP2, COL3A1, CHI3L1, MGP, EMILIN2, COL5A2…
GO:0019838~growth factor binding1.25E-1119COL4A1, IL2RA, OSMR, IGFBP6, COL3A1, ESM1, COL5A1, CD36, IL1RAP, COL1A2…
GO:0030247~polysaccharide binding7.81E-0919FGFR1, SUSD2, C6ORF15, POSTN, CXCL6, COL5A1, PCOLCE2, TNFAIP6, BGN, ANG…
Pathwayhsa04512: ECM-receptor interaction1.35E-1017IBSP, COL4A2, COL4A1, COL3A1, ITGA1, ITGA3, COL5A2, COL5A1, CD36, ITGA5…
hsa04510: Focal adhesion2.82E-0923IBSP, CAV2, CAV1, COL4A2, COL4A1, VAV3, COL3A1, MET, ITGA1, ACTN1…
hsa05322: Systemic lupus erythematosus2.98E-0512HIST1H2AB, HIST2H3A, HIST2H2AA4, HIST1H4L, HIST1H2BH, ACTN1, C1R, HIST2H3C, HIST2H3D…
Downregulated
BP GO:0019226~transmission of nerve impulse1.02E-1434SYT1, SYT4, GABRB3, GLRA3, GABBR2, KCNIP2, SLC1A4, NPTX1, GAD2, S1PR1…
GO:0007268~synaptic transmission2.14E-1330SYT1, SYT4, GABRB3, GLRA3, GABBR2, KCNIP2, SLC1A4, NPTX1, GAD2, SYN1…
GO:0007267~cell-cell signaling5.65E-1240SYT1, EDN3, CCL3, SYT4, GABRB3, FGF17, CAMK2G, GLRA3, FGF12, GABBR2…
CC GO:0045202~synapse4.37E-2245SYT1, SEPT3, CDK5R1, ENAH, SNAP91, CLSTN2, GABRB3, SYT4, GLRA3, GABRB1…
GO:0044456~synapse part1.31E-2037SYT1, SNAP91, CLSTN2, GABRB3, SYT4, GABRB1, GLRA3, SYT9, BCAN, ATP6V1G2…
GO:0043005~neuron projection2.66E-1131SNCG, SYT1, CDK5R1, CCK, ADCY2, SNCB, SYT4, GABRB3, GRIN3A, GABBR2…
MFGO:0005509~calcium ion binding2.79E-1353SYT1, CLSTN2, SYT4, MASP1, SYT9, GRIN3A, KCNIP2, KCNIP3, SYP, ATP2B2……
GO:0022836~gated channel activity4.21E-1229KCNC2, GABRB3, GABRB1, GLRA3, GRIN3A, KCNIP2, KCNK12, KCNJ3, KCNIP3, GRIN2C……
GO:0005216~ion channel activity3.09E-1131KCNC2, GABRB3, GABRB1, GLRA3, GRIN3A, KCNIP2, KCNK12, KCNJ3, KCNIP3, SLC1A4……
Pathwayhsa04080: Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction9.42E-0719GABRG2, GABRA1, THRA, PRLHR, GABRB3, GLRA3, GABRB1, ADCYAP1R1, GRIN1, GRIN3A……
hsa04020: Calcium signaling pathway2.15E-0514ADCY2, SLC8A2, ADCY8, CAMK2G, CACNA1I, GRIN1, GRM1, ATP2B2, CD38, GRIN2C……
hsa04720: Long-term potentiation1.65E-03  7GRIA2, ADCY8, GRIN2C, CAMK2G, PPP1R1A, GRIN1, GRM1

[i] GO, Gene Ontology; BP, biological process; CC, cellular component; MF, molecular function.

PPI network and module analyses

The PPI network constructed for the DEGs in the grade IV, vs. grade II group had 489 nodes and 1,244 interactions (Fig. 2), in which four significant modules were identified (Fig. 3). The PPI network constructed for the DEGs in the grade IV, vs. grade III group had 243 nodes and 500 interactions (Fig. 4), from which two significant modules were identified (Fig. 5). The nodes with higher degrees, including MMP9, vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) and annexin A1 (ANXA1), in the two networks are listed in Table IV. MMP9 interacted with VEGFA in these two PPI networks. No PPI network was constructed for the DEGs in grade III, vs. grade II group. The pathways enriched for the genes involved in the modules are shown in Fig. 6.

Table IV.

Top 15 nodes with highest degrees in the grade IV, vs. grade II protein-protein interaction networks.

Table IV.

Top 15 nodes with highest degrees in the grade IV, vs. grade II protein-protein interaction networks.

NodeLog fold changeDegree
ADCY2−1.9896326
ADCY8−1.1708826
BIRC51.35925426
CDC201.81621826
CENPA1.23663424
CDK21.23954724
GPR17−1.229723
ANXA12.12989923
ZWINT1.19612523
IL81.63431822
MMP93.45889122
VEGFA2.23631722
CLASP2−1.0451921
CCNB11.29093321
MAD2L11.04626820
VEGFA2.22524619
COL18A11.10741118
BIRC51.00640416
ADCY8−1.0983816
ADCY2−1.4078716
CDC201.49786915
COL4A11.87744515
COL1A12.61441415
ANXA11.79397315
ITGA11.17465615
MMP93.3235714
CCNB11.09702814
IL81.42049914
COL1A22.18069414
COL9A31.23109814
Identification of glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes

The glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes among the DEGs screened for each group were further analyzed using the CTD database. In general, 81.48, 86.93 and 89.95% of the DEGs in the grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups, respectively, were glioma-associated genes. Of note, there were 10 common glioma marker genes, including MMP9, CHI3L1, VEGFA and S100 calcium binding protein A4 (S100A4) between the grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups (Table V).

Table V.

Numbers of glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes among the differentially expressed genes screened for each group.

Table V.

Numbers of glioma-associated genes and glioma marker genes among the differentially expressed genes screened for each group.

GroupGlioma-associated genes, n (%)Glioma marker genes (n)
Grade III vs. grade II22 (81.48)  1
Grade IV vs. grade II1,257 (86.93)24
Grade IV vs. grade III698 (89.95)13

Discussion

In the present study, a total of 27 (nine upregulated and 18 downregulated), 1,446 (643 upregulated and 803 downregulated) and 776 (410 upregulated and 366 downregulated) DEGs were identified in the grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups, respectively. Venn diagram analysis showed that 20 DEGs, including five upregulated and 15 downregulated genes, were common genes between the grade III, vs. grade II and grade IV, vs. grade II comparison groups. A total of 698 DEGs, including 356 upregulated and 342 downregulated genes) were common genes between the grade IV, vs. grade II and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups. Four significantly modules were identified from the PPI network constructed for the DEGs in the grade IV, vs. grade II group, and two significantly modules were identified from the PPI network constructed for the DEGs in the grade IV, vs. grade III group. No PPI network was constructed for the DEGs in the grade III, vs. grade II group. It was found that 81.48, 86.93 and 89.95% of the DEGs in the grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV vs. grade II, and grade IV vs. grade III comparison groups, respectively, were glioma-associated genes. In addition, there were 10 common glioma marker genes, including MMP9, CHI3L1, VEGFA and S100A4, between the grade IV, vs. grade II and grade IV, vs. grade III comparison groups.

Inhibiting the expression of MMP9 through RNA interference represses the malignancy of glioma cells, indicating that it can be applied in the treatment of malignant gliomas (2527). MMP2 and MMP9 have significant effects on the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) and angiogenesis, and on the invasiveness of gliomas, therefore, they can be utilized in targeted therapy of malignant glioma (28). CHI3L1 and MMP-9 are overexpressed in malignant gliomas, and can serve as a predictors of survival rates in patients with the disease (29). In addition, CHI3L1 is important in regulating local invasiveness and malignant transformation in gliomas, therefore, CHI3L1 may be a used as a molecular target in the treatment of gliomas (30). In patients with glioma, the serum level of CHI3L1, which encodes a secreted glycoprotein, is associated with tumor grade and possibly tumor burden in glioblastoma multiforme (31). Functional enrichment analyses have shown that MMP9 and CHI3L1 were separately enriched in the ECM and its structural constituent, respectively. ECM rigidity can mediate the invasion of glioblastoma multiforme cells through actomyosin contractility (32,33). These findings indicate that MMP9 and CHI3L1 may function in the progression of malignant gliomas through the ECM.

VEGF is an effective mediator of vascular permeability, and its inhibition can decrease tumor burden and edema production in malignant glioma (34). The growth and progression of astrocytoma is dependent on neovascularization, and the angiogenesis factor VEGFA may be essential for the infiltrative and aggressive growth of astrocytomas (35). VEGFA affects the neovascularization and invasion of glioblastoma, not only by promoting endothelial mitogenesis and permeability, but also by regulating MMP2 (36). In the two PPI networks in the present study, VEGFA interacted with MMP9, indicating that VEGFA may also affect malignant gliomas via interacting with MMP9.

The expression of S100A4 is promoted by neutrophil infiltration, and targeting S100A4 may be promising in reducing antiangiogenic therapy resistance and inhibiting the glioma malignant phenotype (37). S100A4/Mts1 has a higher expression in high-grade glioblastomas, compared with low-grade astrocytic tumors, indicating that it has an effect on brain tumor progression (38). ANXA1, targeted by forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) has a high expression in gliomas and can function as a predictor of poor prognosis in patients with the disease (39). A previous study demonstrated that ANXA1 may contribute to maintaining brain homeostasis and may be used as chemotherapeutic target in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (40). Therefore, S100A4 and ANXA1 may be involved in the development of malignant gliomas.

In conclusion, the present study identified 27, 1,446 and 776 DEGs in the grade III, vs. grade II, grade IV, vs. grade II, and grade IV vs. grade III comparison groups respectively. It was found that MMP9, CHI3L1, VEGFA, S100A4 and ANXA1 may act in the progression of malignant gliomas. However, these findings were obtained from bioinformatics analysis and require further validation.

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund (grant no. LBH-Q14113).

References

1 

Mamelak AN and Jacoby DB: Targeted delivery of antitumoral therapy to glioma and other malignancies with synthetic chlorotoxin (TM-601). Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 4:175–186. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Goodenberger ML and Jenkins RB: Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet. 205:613–621. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Kleihues P, Soylemezoglu F, Schäuble B, Scheithauer BW and Burger PC: Histopathology, classification, and grading of gliomas. Glia. 15:211–221. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW and Kleihues P: The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 114:97–109. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Bleeker FE, Molenaar RJ and Leenstra S: Recent advances in the molecular understanding of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 108:11–27. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Pollack IF, Finkelstein SD, Woods J, Burnham J, Holmes EJ, Hamilton RL, Yates AJ, Boyett JM, Finlay JL and Sposto R; Children's Cancer Group, : Expression of p53 and prognosis in children with malignant gliomas. N Engl J Med. 346:420–427. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Hirose Y, Berger MS and Pieper RO: p53 effects both the duration of G2/M arrest and the fate of temozolomide-treated human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 61:1957–1963. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Pyrko P, Schönthal AH, Hofman FM, Chen TC and Lee AS: The unfolded protein response regulator GRP78/BiP as a novel target for increasing chemosensitivity in malignant gliomas. Cancer Res. 67:9809–9816. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, Hamou MF, de Tribolet N, Weller M, Kros JM, Hainfellner JA, Mason W, Mariani L, et al: MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 352:997–1003. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Fujiwara S, Nakagawa K, Harada H, Nagato S, Furukawa K, Teraoka M, Seno T, Oka K, Iwata S and Ohnishi T: Silencing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha inhibits cell migration and invasion under hypoxic environment in malignant gliomas. Int J Oncol. 30:793–802. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zagzag D, Lukyanov Y, Lan L, Ali MA, Esencay M, Mendez O, Yee H, Voura EB and Newcomb EW: Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and VEGF upregulate CXCR4 in glioblastoma: Implications for angiogenesis and glioma cell invasion. Lab Invest. 86:1221–1232. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Roth W, Isenmann S, Nakamura M, Platten M, Wick W, Kleihues P, Bähr M, Ohgaki H, Ashkenazi A and Weller M: Soluble decoy receptor 3 is expressed by malignant gliomas and suppresses CD95 ligand-induced apoptosis and chemotaxis. Cancer Res. 61:2759–2765. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Osada H, Tokunaga T, Nishi M, Hatanaka H, Abe Y, Tsugu A, Kijima H, Yamazaki H, Ueyama Y and Nakamura M: Overexpression of the neuropilin 1 (NRP1) gene correlated with poor prognosis in human glioma. Anticancer Res. 24:547–552. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Zhang L, Shen A, Ke Q, Zhao W, Yan M and Cheng C: Spy1 is frequently overexpressed in malignant gliomas and critically regulates the proliferation of glioma cells. J Mol Neurosci. 47:485–494. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Guan X, Vengoechea J, Zheng S, Sloan AE, Chen Y, Brat DJ, O'Neill BP, de Groot J, Yust-Katz S, Yung WK, et al: Molecular subtypes of glioblastoma are relevant to lower grade glioma. PLoS One. 9:e912162014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W and Smyth GK: Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:e472015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Cai H, Chen H, Yi T, Daimon CM, Boyle JP, Peers C, Maudsley S and Martin B: VennPlex-a novel Venn diagram program for comparing and visualizing datasets with differentially regulated datapoints. PLoS One. 8:e533882013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Database Issue): D258–D261. 2004.PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y and Hattori M: The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(Database Issue): D277–D280. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Jensen LJ, Kuhn M, Stark M, Chaffron S, Creevey C, Muller J, Doerks T, Julien P, Roth A, Simonovic M, et al: STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 37(Database Issue): D412–D416. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, et al: STRING v10: Protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(Database Issue): D447–D452. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Saito R, Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang PL, Lotia S, Pico AR, Bader GD and Ideker T: A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat Methods. 9:1069–1076. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Nepusz T, Yu H and Paccanaro A: Detecting overlapping protein complexes in protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Methods. 9:471–472. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Davis AP, Grondin CJ, Lennon-Hopkins K, Saraceni-Richards C, Sciaky D, King BL, Wiegers TC and Mattingly CJ: The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database's 10th year anniversary: Update 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(Database Issue): D914–D920. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Lakka SS, Gondi CS, Yanamandra N, Olivero WC, Dinh DH, Gujrati M and Rao JS: Inhibition of cathepsin B and MMP-9 gene expression in glioblastoma cell line via RNA interference reduces tumor cell invasion, tumor growth and angiogenesis. Oncogene. 23:4681–4689. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Sun C, Wang Q, Zhou H, Yu S, Simard AR, Kang C, Li Y, Kong Y, An T, Wen Y, et al: Antisense MMP-9 RNA inhibits malignant glioma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Neurosci Bull. 29:83–93. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Gondi CS, Lakka SS, Dinh DH, Olivero WC, Gujrati M and Rao JS: Downregulation of uPA, uPAR and MMP-9 using small, interfering, hairpin RNA (siRNA) inhibits glioma cell invasion, angiogenesis and tumor growth. Neuron Glia Biol. 1:165–176. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Wang M, Wang T, Liu S, Yoshida D and Teramoto A: The expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and-9 in human gliomas of different pathological grades. Brain Tumor Pathol. 20:65–72. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Hormigo A, Gu B, Karimi S, Riedel E, Panageas KS, Edgar MA, Tanwar MK, Rao JS, Fleisher M, DeAngelis LM and Holland EC: YKL-40 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 as potential serum biomarkers for patients with high-grade gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 12:5698–5704. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Ku BM, Lee YK, Ryu J, Jeong JY, Choi J, Eun KM, Shin HY, Kim DG, Hwang EM, Yoo JC, et al: CHI3L1 (YKL-40) is expressed in human gliomas and regulates the invasion, growth and survival of glioma cells. Int J Cancer. 128:1316–1326. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Tanwar MK, Gilbert MR and Holland EC: Gene expression microarray analysis reveals YKL-40 to be a potential serum marker for malignant character in human glioma. Cancer Res. 62:4364–4368. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Ulrich TA, de Juan Pardo EM and Kumar S: The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res. 69:4167–4174. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Bellail AC, Hunter SB, Brat DJ, Tan C and Van Meir EG: Microregional extracellular matrix heterogeneity in brain modulates glioma cell invasion. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 36:1046–1069. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Carlson MR, Pope WB, Horvath S, Braunstein JG, Nghiemphu P, Tso CL, Mellinghoff I, Lai A, Liau LM, Mischel PS, et al: Relationship between survival and edema in malignant gliomas: Role of vascular endothelial growth factor and neuronal pentraxin 2. Clin Cancer Res. 13:2592–2598. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Johansson M, Brännström T, Bergenheim AT and Henriksson R: Spatial expression of VEGF-A in human glioma. J Neurooncol. 59:1–6. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Gong J, Zhu S, Zhang Y and Wang J: Interplay of VEGFa and MMP2 regulates invasion of glioblastoma. Tumor Biol. 35:11879–11885. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Liang J, Piao Y, Holmes L, Fuller GN, Henry V, Tiao N and de Groot JF: Neutrophils promote the malignant glioma phenotype through S100A4. Clin Cancer Res. 20:187–198. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Takenaga K, Nygren J, Zelenina M, Ohira M, Iuchi T, Lukanidin E, Sjöquist M and Kozlova EN: Modified expression of Mts1/S100A4 protein in C6 glioma cells or surrounding astrocytes affects migration of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Neurobiol Dis. 25:455–463. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Cheng SX, Tu Y and Zhang S: FoxM1 promotes glioma cells progression by up-regulating Anxa1 expression. PLoS One. 8:e723762013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Festa M, Caputo M, Cipolla C, D'Acunto C, Rossi A, Tecce M and Capasso A: The involvement of xanthohumol in the expression of annexin in human malignant glioblastoma cells. Open Biochem J. 7:1–10. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November-2017
Volume 16 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Xu Y, Wang J, Xu Y, Xiao H, Li J and Wang Z: Screening critical genes associated with malignant glioma using bioinformatics analysis. Mol Med Rep 16: 6580-6589, 2017.
APA
Xu, Y., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Xiao, H., Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2017). Screening critical genes associated with malignant glioma using bioinformatics analysis. Molecular Medicine Reports, 16, 6580-6589. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7471
MLA
Xu, Y., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Xiao, H., Li, J., Wang, Z."Screening critical genes associated with malignant glioma using bioinformatics analysis". Molecular Medicine Reports 16.5 (2017): 6580-6589.
Chicago
Xu, Y., Wang, J., Xu, Y., Xiao, H., Li, J., Wang, Z."Screening critical genes associated with malignant glioma using bioinformatics analysis". Molecular Medicine Reports 16, no. 5 (2017): 6580-6589. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.7471