MicroRNA-126/stromal cell-derived factor 1/C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 signaling pathway promotes post-stroke angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cell transplantation
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 29, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8513
- Pages: 5300-5305
Abstract
Introduction
Stroke is the leading cause of mortality and permanent disabilities worldwide (1). Patients with ischemic brain injury suffer from strokes and the prognosis is poor. Thus, the current treatment of strokes requires further improvement.
Previous studies have demonstrated that decreased quantities of microvessels, reduced collateral circulation and damaged neovascularization were associated with the poor prognosis of stroke (2). As a type of adult stem cell, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are pivotal in keeping the endothelium intact and for vascular homeostasis during the process of angiogenesis (3,4). These functions allow EPCs to engage in vascular repair. Increasing evidence indicates that the quantity of EPCs decreased in stroke patients (5–7). Furthermore, studies demonstrate that infusion of EPCs attenuated tissue injury, promoted angiogenesis and improved functional recovery of ischemia organs, such as the heart and brain (8,9). These findings provide the theoretical basis for treatment of EPCs.
microRNAs (miRNA) are a type of non-coding RNA (length, 20–25 bp) and >30% of human genes are under post-transcriptional regulation of miRNAs (10). The post-transcription regulatory effect of miRNAs provides a novel strategy for gene expression regulation and influences cellular events (11). A previous study indicated that miRNA is involved in angiogenesis and miR-126 modification enhances the function of EPCs, so as to improve therapeutic efficacy (12).
Thus, the present study evaluated the expression level and function of miR-126 in EPCs, and demonstrated the miR-126-associated mechanism using a cell migration model in vitro and a middle cerebral artery occlusion model in vivo.
Materials and methods
Extraction, culture and identification of EPCs
A total of 15 healthy male mice, aged 8–10 weeks and weighing 20–25 g were purchased from Shanghai SLAC laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The mice were housed in a sterilized and specific pathogen free environment with a temperature ~25°C, 12-h light/dark cycle and free access to sterilized food and water. All procedures involving the mice were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Weifang People's Hospital.
As reported previously (13), EPCs were extracted from mouse bone marrow. Thighbone and shinbone were harvested from the leg of mice after removal of muscle from entire leg for the extraction of mononuclear cells using the density gradient method. Extracted cells (1×106) were cultured in 24-well plates with Endothelial Basal Medium-2 (EBM-2; Clonetics Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 3 days. Non-adherent cells were discarded after 3 days of culture. Dil-acetylated-low density lipoprotein (Dil-Ac-LDL) and Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA-1) immunofluorescent staining (at 37°C for 1 h) were performed under a fluorescent microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). Meanwhile, cluster of differentiation (CD)34, CD133 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) were also measured by flow cytometry (BD FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) using FITC-conjugated anti-CD34 antibody, PE-conjugated anti-CD133 antibody and APC-conjugated anti-VEGFR2 antibody.
Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)
RNA was extracted from bone marrow-derived EPCs using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed using M-MLV First-Strand Synthesis reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and mRNA expression levels of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) and miR-126 were examined using the SYBR method (SYBR-Green Quantitative RT-qPCR kit; QR0100; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). qPCR was performed using an iCycler IQ® RT-PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). PCR reaction was performed under the condition of 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec and 60°C for 15 sec, and finally 72°C for 10 sec. The expression level of SDF-1 was assessed with GAPDH serving as the internal control, and miR-126 with U6 RNA as the internal control. The data was quantified using 2−ΔΔCq method (14). The primer sequences are presented in Table I.
Cell transfection
Bone marrow-derived EPCs or bEnd3 cells (mouse brain endothelial cell line; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) (5×104 cells) were cultured in 6-well plates. Scramble and angomir-126 were transfected into the cells using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocols. A 48-h culture was maintained at 37°C and then transfected cells collected by centrifugation at 125 × g for 5 min at room temperature.
Cell migration experiment
The cell migration experiment was performed via Transwell assay. Transfected cells (2×104) were cultured in the upper compartment of a Transwell plate. SDF-1 (100 ng/ml) or C-X-C chemokine receptor type 7 (CXCR7; 100 ng/ml) neutralizing antibody (MAB7167; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was added to the lower compartment of the Transwell plate. Cell abundance was assessed using a fluorescence microscope (magnification, ×40; 5 randomly selected visual fields). Untransfected EPCs served as the control.
Western blot analysis
Western blotting was performed to examine the expression level of CXCR-7 in the cells. Cells were lysed with RIPA Lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and protein was determined by Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Then, 10% SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis was performed with 20 µg protein being loaded per lane, and proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes at a constant voltage setting of 25 V for 2 h. The PVDF membranes were blocked with skimmed milk (5%) and then incubated with CXCR7 antibody (PA3-069; 1:3,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 25°C for 2 h or GAPDH antibody (ab37168; 1:3,000; Abcam) followed by addition of HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (65–6120; 1:5,000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). GAPDH served as the internal control. Specific protein bands were examined by chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Reporter gene assay
EPCs were cultured in 96-well plates at 37°C for 3 days. Co-transfection was performed with 20 ng angomir-126, 5 pmol negative control and 100 ng pLUC SDF-1 3′-untranslated region (UTR) wild type (WT) or mutant after 24 h of culture. Transfection was performed with Lipofectamine 2000. The reporter gene assay was performed using a Luciferase assay system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Animal experiments
The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Weifang People's Hospital (Shandong, China). The mice were randomly assigned to three groups (5 mice per group), including a control group, EPC group and an EPC + miR-126 group. Middle cerebral artery occlusion was performed according to a previously reported protocol (15). In the EPC and EPC + miR-126 groups, EPCs (2×105) were infused via intravenous injection into the tail after 2 h of occlusion. Isovolumetric phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was infused in the control group mice.
Neurological scoring
Then, 5-mark scoring was performed according to previously reported protocol (16). Scoring was as follows: 0, normal neurological function; 1, bending of contralateral trunk and foreleg as the leg was lifted; 2, torsion of contralateral trunk as leg was lifted, while normal at resting-state; 3, torsion of contralateral trunk at rest; 4, loss of autonomic movement.
Examination of microvessel density
Mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day 2 and 7 after transfection. As reported previously (5), Fluoro-Jade and CD31 staining were performed on cerebral sections. Microvessel density was assessed using ImageJ software version 1.44 (National Institutes of Health-Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data processing. Measurement data are presented as normal distribution to mean ± standard deviation. Student's t-test and analysis of variance (one-way for comparison among different groups, two-way for comparison among groups at different time points) were performed to establish the statistical significance and P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Identification of EPCs
As presented in Fig. 1A and B, EPCs were roughly circular and formed a cell colony following 3 days of culture. EPCs were fusiform after 7 days of culture. Flow cytometry indicated that CD34, CD133 and VEGFR2 were expressed in EPCs (Fig. 1C). Immunofluorescent staining indicated that Dil-ac-LDL and UEA-1 were expressed in EPCs (Fig. 1D).
miR-126 and CXCR7 are expressed in EPCs
Western blot analysis demonstrated CXCR7 protein expression in EPCs. In addition, miR-126 and CXCR7 mRNA expression was observed in EPCs, as verified by qPCR (Fig. 2).
miR-126 regulates SDF-1 in EPCs
TargetScan software demonstrated that the 3′UTR region of SDF-1 was complementary base paired with the sequence of miR-126, indicating that SDF-1 is a target gene of miR-126 (Fig. 3A). The association between SDF-1 and miR-126 was determined using a reporter gene assay and RT-qPCR. The fluorescence intensity was decreased by 45% following transfection of antagomir-126 into the WT, while no difference was observed in the mutant (Fig. 3B). The miR-126 angomir significantly reduced the expression level of SDF-1, which was verified by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3C).
CXCR-7 inhibition abrogates miR-126 angomir-induced migration of EPCs
The Transwell assay demonstrated that inhibition of CXCR7 repressed migration of the miR-126 angomir-transfected cells, indicating that CXCR7 was involved in miR-126-induced migration of EPCs (Fig. 4).
miR-126 angomir improves the efficacy of EPC treatment in mice with middle cerebral artery occlusion
In the animal experiments, miR-126 angomir-transfected EPCs demonstrated significantly increased microvessel densities at 2 and 7 days after middle cerebral artery occlusion (Fig. 5A and B). In addition, miR-126 angomir-transfected EPCs improved the prognosis of neurological function, as verified by increased neurological scores and decreased infarct volumes (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Antagomir, as a group of oligonucleotides, is a type of chemically engineered single-strand mRNA inhibitor that efficiently blocks miRNA regulation of target gene expression. The antisense strand consists of two phosphorothioates at the 5′ end, four phosphorothioates, four cholesterol groups at the 3′ end, with 2′-methoxy modification (17). Previous studies identified that miR-126 influenced angiogenesis in gene knock-out mice models or angomir treatment models, indicating that miR-126 may have attenuated structural damage to vessels (18–20). The present study demonstrated that miR-126 angomir contributed to EPC treatment.
SDF-1, also termed CXCL12, has been implicated in various types of disease, including numerous cancer types (21) and coronary artery disease (22). SDF-1 exerts a significant regulatory role in various processes, such as morphogenesis, angiogenesis and immune responses, and is considered to be a potential target for drug development (23). Furthermore, CXCR7, also termed atypical chemokine receptor 3 or G-protein coupled receptor 159, is a high affinity receptor of CXCL12, and has recently been identified to be involved in the growth, migration, chemotaxis, adhesion and spreading of tumors (24). The current study elucidated that miR-126 exerted a protective effect of EPCs during angiogenesis via the SDF-1/CXCR7 signaling pathway. In addition, the neutralizing antibody of CXCR7 blocked the migration-induced effect of the miR-126 angomir on EPCs in vitro. Furthermore, infusion of the miR-126 angomir-treated EPCs was more effective than routine EPC treatment, which improved neurological scores, increased microvessel density and decreased infarct volume.
Interactions between miR-126 and SDF-1 has been demonstrated to increase elimination of endothelial apoptosis bodies induced by miR-126 (25). A potential mechanism is that miR-126 enhances the expression level of SDF-1 via inhibiting regulators of G protein signalling (25). The present study confirmed that silencing of miR-126 was associated with changes of SDF-1 expression levels, indicating miR-126 as a potential biomarker for clinical treatment. miRNAs have been associated with the occurrence and progression of diseases (26). Furthermore, circulating miRNAs influence tumorigenesis (27) and cardiovascular diseases (28,29). Endothelial injury is a significant risk factor for patients with cardiovascular diseases. miRNAs secreted by EPCs have been demonstrated as cardiovascular disease markers in the clinical setting (30). Clinical trials have indicated that miR-126 expression levels decreased in acute coronary syndrome patients and diabetes patients (31,32). Thus, miR-126-associated signaling pathways have specific signals for EPCs, and selective activation of miR-126 was significant during EPC treatment.
In addition, miR-126 inhibits the expression of SDF-1 and stimulates angiogenesis when vessels are injured. Furthermore, downregulation of miR-126 inhibits angiogenesis in aging EPCs or EPCs with function disorders. The current study indicated that miR-126 improved the function of ECPs and angiogenesis via the downregulation of SDF-1.
In conclusion, miR-126 indeed improved migration of EPCs via the miR-126/SDF-1/CXCR7 signaling pathway. Furthermore, the miR-126 angomir improved efficacy of EPC treatment, and may present as a potential therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases. The main study limitation is that the EPC used in the present study was from mouse, not human, whether this effect also exists in human EPCs remains unclear and requires further investigation.
References
Ma F, Morancho A, Montaner J and Rosell A: Endothelial progenitor cells and revascularization following stroke. Brain Res. 1623:150–159. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen J, Chen J, Chen S, Zhang C, Zhang L, Xiao X, Das A, Zhao Y, Yuan B, Morris M, et al: Transfusion of cxcr4-primed endothelial progenitor cells reduces cerebral ischemic damage and promotes repair in db/db diabetic mice. PloS One. 7:e501052012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Werner N and Nickenig G: Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells: Limitations for therapy? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 26:257–266. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Quirici N, Soligo D, Caneva L, Servida F, Bossolasco P and Deliliers GL: Differentiation and expansion of endothelial cells from human bone marrow cd133(+) cells. Br J Haematol. 115:186–194. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen J, Chen S and Chen Y, Zhang C, Wang J, Zhang W, Liu G, Zhao B and Chen Y: Circulating endothelial progenitor cells and cellular membrane microparticles in db/db diabetic mouse: Possible implications in cerebral ischemic damage. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 301:E62–E71. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yue WS, Lau KK, Siu CW, Wang M, Yan GH, Yiu KH and Tse HF: Impact of glycemic control on circulating endothelial progenitor cells and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 10:1132011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miller-Kasprzak E and Jagodziński PP: Endothelial progenitor cells as a new agent contributing to vascular repair. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 55:247–259. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chong MS, Ng WK and Chan JK: Concise review: Endothelial progenitor cells in regenerative medicine: Applications and challenges. Stem Cells Transl Med. 5:530–538. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fan Y, Shen F, Frenzel T, Zhu W, Ye J, Liu J, Chen Y, Su H, Young WL and Yang GY: Endothelial progenitor cell transplantation improves long-term stroke outcome in mice. Ann Neurol. 67:488–497. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chekulaeva M and Filipowicz W: Mechanisms of miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation in animal cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 21:452–460. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN and Sonenberg N: Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: Are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet. 9:102–114. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Urbich C, Kuehbacher A and Dimmeler S: Role of microRNAs in vascular diseases, inflammation, and angiogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 79:581–588. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marrotte EJ, Chen DD, Hakim JS and Chen AF: Manganese superoxide dismutase expression in endothelial progenitor cells accelerates wound healing in diabetic mice. J Clin Invest. 120:4207–4219. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen S, Li G, Zhang W, Wang J, Sigmund CD, Olson JE and Chen Y: Ischemia-induced brain damage is enhanced in human renin and angiotensinogen double-transgenic mice. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 297:R1526–R1531. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Girouard H, Lessard A, Capone C, Milner TA and Iadecola C: The neurovascular dysfunction induced by angiotensin II in the mouse neocortex is sexually dimorphic. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 294:H156–H163. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scherr M, Venturini L, Battmer K, Schaller-Schoenitz M, Schaefer D, Dallmann I, Ganser A and Eder M: Lentivirus-mediated antagomir expression for specific inhibition of miRNA function. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:e1492007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sessa R, Seano G, di Blasio L, Gagliardi PA, Isella C, Medico E, Cotelli F, Bussolino F and Primo L: The miR-126 regulates angiopoietin-1 signaling and vessel maturation by targeting p85β. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1823:1925–1935. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
van Solingen C, Seghers L, Bijkerk R, Duijs JM, Roeten MK, van Oeveren-Rietdijk AM, Baelde HJ, Monge M, Vos JB, de Boer HC, et al: Antagomir-mediated silencing of endothelial cell specific microRNA-126 impairs ischemia-induced angiogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 13:1577–1585. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang S, Aurora AB, Johnson BA, Qi X, McAnally J, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R and Olson EN: The endothelial-specific microRNA miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev Cell. 15:261–271. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo JC, Li J, Zhou L, Yang JY, Zhang ZG, Liang ZY, Zhou WX, You L, Zhang TP and Zhao YP: CXCL12-CXCR7 axis contributes to the invasive phenotype of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 7:62006–62018. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mega JL, Stitziel NO, Smith JG, Chasman DI, Caulfield M, Devlin JJ, Nordio F, Hyde C, Cannon CP, Sacks F, et al: Genetic risk, coronary heart disease events, and the clinical benefit of statin therapy: An analysis of primary and secondary prevention trials. Lancet. 385:2264–2271. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neesse A and Ellenrieder V: NEMO-CXCL12/CXCR4 axis: A novel vantage point for antifibrotic therapies in chronic pancreatitis? Gut. 66:211–212. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun X, Cheng G, Hao M, Zheng J, Zhou X, Zhang J, Taichman RS, Pienta KJ and Wang J: CXCL12/CXCR4/CXCR7 chemokine axis and cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 29:709–22. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zernecke A, Bidzhekov K, Noels H, Shagdarsuren E, Gan L, Denecke B, Hristov M, Köppel T, Jahantigh MN, Lutgens E, et al: Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL12-dependent vascular protection. Sci Signal. 2:ra812009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, et al: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:pp. 10513–10518. 2008; View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lawrie CH, Gal S, Dunlop HM, Pushkaran B, Liggins AP, Pulford K, Banham AH, Pezzella F, Boultwood J, Wainscoat JS, et al: Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 141:672–675. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Corsten MF, Dennert R, Jochems S, Kuznetsova T, Devaux Y, Hofstra L, Wagner DR, Staessen JA, Heymans S and Schroen B: Circulating microRNA-208b and microRNA-499 reflect myocardial damage in cardiovascular disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 3:499–506. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ai J, Zhang R, Li Y, Pu J, Lu Y, Jiao J, Li K, Yu B, Li Z, Wang R, et al: Circulating microRNA-1 as a potential novel biomarker for acute myocardial infarction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 391:73–77. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bronze-da-Rocha E: MicroRNAs expression profiles in cardiovascular diseases. Biomed Res Int. 2014:9854082014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fichtlscherer S, De Rosa S, Fox H, Schwietz T, Fischer A, Liebetrau C, Weber M, Hamm CW, Röxe T, Müller-Ardogan M, et al: Circulating microRNAs in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 107:677–684. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, Willeit P, Mayr U, Prokopi M, Mayr A, Weger S, Oberhollenzer F, Bonora E, et al: Plasma microRNA profiling reveals loss of endothelial miR-126 and other microRNAs in type 2 diabetes. Circ Res. 107:810–817. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |