Whole‑genome sequencing of a monozygotic twin discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus

  • Authors:
    • Fei Chen
    • Zhen Li
    • Rong Li
    • Yunlong Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: April 20, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8912
  • Pages: 8391-8396
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease, and its genetic causes remain to be fully elucidated. Previous studies have identified several susceptibility genes for SLE, such as deoxyribonuclease 1‑like 3. In the present study, whole‑genome sequencing (30X coverage) was performed on the leukocytes of a monozygotic twin discordant for SLE to assess the potential association of de novo variants and copy number variations (CNVs) with the susceptibility to SLE. After analyzing the genomic data, 8 putative discordant exonic variants between the twins were selected. However, the 8 variants that were chosen for validation with Sanger sequencing exhibited no discrepancy in the leukocytes from the twins. Of note, CNV alterations in genes of SLE‑associated pathways were identified between the twins, which may be linked with the phenotype of the monozygotic twin discordant for SLE. The above results suggest that genomic sequences of leukocytes in the monozygotic twins may exhibit a rare difference, and that CNV changes may be associated with phenotype differences in the twin discordant for SLE.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease (1,2). The pathological mechanism comprises the attack of numerous parts of healthy tissues in the body by the patients' own immune system (3). SLE patients present with painful and swollen joints, fever and chest pain (4). The exact causes of SLE have remained to be elucidated; however, hormonal, environmental and genetic factors are thought to be associated with the causes of SLE (5). At present, no cure is available for SLE, and the life expectancy of SLE patients is relatively short (6). Therefore, further research is required in the field of SLE. Understanding the exact causes of SLE will facilitate the therapy and drug design for SLE.

In the past several years, numerous susceptibility genes for SLE have been discovered, including interferon regulatory factor (IRF)5, signal transducer and activator of transcription 4, IKAROS family zinc finger 1, ETS proto-oncogene 1 and deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3 (711). Although the exact functional association between these genes and SLE require further investigation, these results indicate a link of genetic factors with SLE. Comparing the genomes of monozygotic twins discordant for phenotypes is a tool to identify possible mutations and copy number variations (CNVs) causing these discordant phenotypes (1214). Kondo et al (15) studied a monozygotic twin discordant for Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. They identified genetic differences in the IRF6 gene that are associated with the phenotype discordance for the monozygotic twin. In the present study, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), a widely used research tool for studying genetic disease (1618), was applied to assess a monozygotic twin discordant for SLE to identify the possibly responsible mutation(s).

In the present study, a monozygotic twin discordant for SLE was assessed by using WGS. Although the putative discordant exonic variants between the twins were selected from the WGS data, it was not possible to further verify these variants by conventional Sanger sequencing. Of note, CNVs changes in SLE pathway genes were detected in the twin discordant for SLE. Therefore, CNVs changes in SLE genes may be associated with the pathology of the twin discordant for SLE.

Materials and methods

Patients and genomic DNA isolation

Whole blood samples of twin A and twin B were obtained at the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (Kunming, China) during their visit to the clinical center in August 2016. The affected individual (twin A) was diagnosed with SLE. The parents of the twins are healthy.

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology). Written informed consent was obtained from the participants. Genomic DNA from the whole blood samples were extracted using the E.Z.N.A.® Blood DNA Kit (cat. no. D3392-02; Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

WGS and single nucleotide variant (SNV)/insertions or deletions (indel) and CNV analysis

WGS was performed on the genomic DNA of the leukocytes from each of the twins by using the HiSeq X Ten platform (Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, South Korea). All of the experiments were performed by using TruSeq Nano DNA kit (cat. no. 20015965; Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) based on the Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA library preparation guide (Illumina). In brief, genomic DNA was fragmented by Covaris sonicator system to obtain 300–400 bp fragments. The DNA fragments were converted into blunt ends using the End Repair mix (Illumina). A single ‘A’ nucleotide was added to the 3′ ends of the blunted fragments to prevent them from ligating to one another during the adapter ligation reaction. The ends of the DNA fragments were ligated to multiple indexing adapters. The DNA fragments were then sequenced using a HiSeq X Ten sequencer (Macrogen, Inc.).

Candidate SNVs, indels and CNVs were extracted and annotated by software including Isaac Aligner (19), Isaac Variant Caller (19), SnpEff (20), Control-FREEC (21) and Manta (22). The detailed steps of analyzing WGS data are displayed in Table I. In general, the non-synonymous, splicing, stop gained, stop loss and frame shift variants were extracted from the total variants. The SNVs/indels were further filtered by using the dbSNP (23), 1000 genome (24) and ESP6500 databases (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) with a threshold of minor allele frequency (MAF)<0.01. The candidate discordant SNVs/indels between the twins were identified by comparing the above variants of twin A (the affected individual) with those of twin B. The discordant SNVs/indels observed in twin A and twin B were determined as a candidate discordant SNVs/indels set. These variants were further filtered by using SIFT score <0.05 (25), Polyphen-2 score >0.85 (26) and other criteria [insufficient coverage (<5) and obvious false-positive variants]. Integrative Genomics Viewer software (27,28) was used to exclude the obvious false-positive variants by visualization of alignment data from the two twins. After the above filtrations, the putative discordant SNVs/indels were selected out and validated by conventional Sanger sequencing.

Table I.

Sequencing results and exclusion criteria for whole genome sequencing data analysis.

Table I.

Sequencing results and exclusion criteria for whole genome sequencing data analysis.

ParameterTwin ATwin B
Total reads782,904,696793,057,758
Total yield (Mbp)117,435118,958
Mappable yield (Mbp)100,041101,845
Mappable mean depth (X)35.0035.60
SNVs and Indels
No. of total variants3,585,5673,586,390
No. of non-synonymous, splicing, stop gained, stop loss and frame shift variants2212022125
No. of variants after dbSNP, 1,000 genome and ESP6500 databases filtering234234
(Minor allele frequency<0.01)
No. of variants in twin A but not in twin B and filtered by SIFT (<0.05), polyphen-217
(>0.85) and other criteria[insufficient coverage (<5) and obvious false-positive variants]
No. of putative discordant exonic variants chosen for Sanger sequencing (Table II)8
No. of chosen putative discordant variants validated by Sanger sequencing0
Copy no. variants
  Gains (>2)554572
  Losses (<2)285316

[i] Values are expressed as n unless otherwise specified. SNVs, single nucleotide variants; Indels, insertions or deletions.

In the CNV analysis, the CNVs between twin A and twin B were compared. The discordant CNVs between twin A and twin B were respectively subjected to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis by using PERL and the R programming language. R's phyper was used to calculate the P-value in the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and sequencing

The fragments of candidate genes harboring the discordant SNVs/indels (Table I) were amplified using PCR. The primers used for amplification and sequencing of zinc finger protein 595, ankyrin repeat domain 20 family member (ANKRD20)A2, ANKRD20A4, ArfGAP with GTPase domain, Speedy/RINGO cell cycle regulator family member E2B, γ-glutamyltransferase 1 (GGT1) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 gene fragments were obtained from the Beijing Genomics Institute (Shenzhen, China). The sequences of the primers are available on request. Amplification of the fragments was performed in a volume of 25 µl containing 30 ng genomic DNA, 50 µM deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10X LA Taq™ PCR buffer, 2.5 units of Takara LA Taq™ (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan) and 0.2 µM of each forward and reverse primer. The PCR amplification for these gene fragments was performed using a denaturation step of 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 60°C and extension at 72°C for 30 sec, and ended with a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min.

The PCR products were purified using a Genomic DNA Purification kit (cat. no. DP204-02; Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Tiangen, China) and were sequenced using sequencing primers (available upon request) and the Big Dye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing kit (cat. no. 4337456; Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) on an ABI Prism 3730 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Sequences were compared between the two twins to verify the discordant variants.

Results

WGS

To identify a potential association of de novo variants and CNVs with SLE, WGS was performed on the DNA of leukocytes from the two twins. A total of 3,585,567 and 793,057,758 variants were identified in twin A and B, respectively. The number of non-synonymous, splicing, stop gained, stop loss and frame shift variants in twin A and B was 22,120 and 22,125, respectively. The above potentially functional variants were further filtered with the dbSNP (23), 1000 genome (24) and ESP6500 databases (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), as well as SIFT score <0.05 (19) and Polyphen-2 score >0.85 (26), as presented in Table I. At last, 8 putative variants in 7 genes were finally selected out for subsequent Sanger sequencing (Table II). Of the 7 genes, only the GGT1 gene has records in the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database (29). The GGT1 gene has been reported to be associated with diseases, including glutathionuria and extrahepatic cholestasis. The 8 discordant variants were validated by conventional Sanger sequencing. None of the above discordant variants was successfully validated by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1). To tell from the results, the discordant variants from the WGS may have exhibited minor differences between twin A and twin B.

Table II.

Putative discordant variants chosen for Sanger sequencing from whole genome sequencing data.

Table II.

Putative discordant variants chosen for Sanger sequencing from whole genome sequencing data.

Chromosomal locationGeneTranscript IDAmino acid alterationRefAltQualityZygosityRead no.Disease associated with gene
chr4:86248ZNF595NM_182524.2K284TAC121Het24,15
chr7:102294074SPDYE2LNM_001166339.1S113PTC37Het10,5
chr9:43129577ANKRD20A2NM_001012421.1L128FGA67Het9,8
chr9:69382292ANKRD20A4NM_001098805.1H67RAG38Het13,5
chr10:51464748AGAP7NM_001077685.2R570WGA129Het5,8
chr10:120801832EIF3ANM_003750.2R1067QCT136Het18,13
chr22:25023537GGT1NM_001032364.2V387IGA46Het28,9 Glutathioninuria
chr22:25023540GGT1NM_001032364.2A388TGA36Het28,9 Glutathioninuria

[i] Ref, reference; Alt, alteration; Chr, chromosome; Het, heterozygous; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; EIF3A, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit A; AGAP7, ArfGAP with GTPase domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 7, pseudogene; ANKRD20, ankyrin repeat domain 20 family; SPDYE2L, Speedy/RINGO cell cycle regulator family member E2B; ZNF, zinc finger protein.

CNV analysis

As presented in Table I, twin A as well as twin B displayed changes in CNVs. The discordant CNVs in twin A and twin B were respectively subjected to KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Of all discordant CNVs in twin A and twin B, only the genes with discordant copy number losses in twin A (the affected individual) were significantly enriched in pathways including SLE, alcoholism and olfactory transduction, as presented in Table III. Enriched SLE pathway genes with copy number losses in twin A were histone cluster 2 H2A family member A3 (HIST2H2AA3), HIST2H2AA4, HIST2H3A, HIST2H3C, HIST2H4A and HIST2H4B. The results suggested that CNV changes may be associated with the phenotype of the monozygotic twin discordant for SLE.

Table III.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis of discordant copy no. losses of twin A.

Table III.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis of discordant copy no. losses of twin A.

PathwayGenes with CNV with pathway annotation, n (%)All genes with pathway annotation, n (%)Enrichment factorP-valueQ-valuePathway IDNames of genes with CNV
Systemic lupus6 (15.00)133 (1.96)0.04510.0001110.004227ko05322HIST2H2AA3, HIST2H2AA4, HIST2H3A,
erythematosus HIST2H3C, HIST2H4A, HIST2H4B
Alcoholism6 (15.00)179 (2.63)0.03350.0005580.010607ko05034HIST2H2AA3, HIST2H2AA4, HIST2H3A,
HIST2H3C, HIST2H4A, HIST2H4B
Olfactory transduction6 (15.00)399 (5.87)0.0150.0277120.330570ko04740OR2G6, OR2T10, OR2T11, OR2T27, OR2T29,
OR2T34
Caffeine metabolism1 (2.50)6 (0.09)0.16670.0347970.330570ko00232CYP2A7

[i] CNV, copy number variations; HIST2H2A, histone cluster 2 H2A family; HIST2H3, histone cluster 2 H3 family; HIST2H4, histone cluster 2 H4 family; OR2G6,olfactory receptor family 2; CYP, cytochrome P450 family 2.

Discussion

At present, studies assessing monozygotic twins discordant for SLE by using WGS are rare. Due to the possibility of the existence of de novo variants and alterations of CNVs in monozygotic twins (13,15,18,30), the present study used WGS to explore the possible disease-causing variants which are responsible for the discordance in monozygotic twins regarding SLE. A total of 8 putative discordant variants in the DNA of leukocytes were selected out for validation by Sanger sequencing. However, no difference was identified in these variants between the monozygotic twins. Of note, copy numbers in certain SLE pathway genes exhibited alterations in monozygotic twins discordant for SLE.

The invalidation of the selected discordant variants in the present study was consistent with previous similar studies. The studies by Baranzini et al (31), Chaiyasap et al (32) and Solomon et al (33) did not identify any discordant variants in monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis, congenital heart defect or vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies and limb abnormalities, respectively. By contrast, Reumers et al (30) and Tang et al (18) identified discordant variants in the monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. The results of these studies suggested that the de novo mutations in the monozygotic twin discordant for certain phenotypes may be specific for certain types of disease. Furthermore, as for the unsuccessful identification of discordant variants in the present study and certain previous studies, the following considerations were raised for using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to study monozygotic twins discordant for certain phenotypes: i) Although NGS technology is able to efficiently sequence a large amount of genes at a time, it also has high error rates (34). The discordant variants obtained by WGS in the present study may be due to sequencing errors. In addition, the average sequencing depth in the present study was 30 X, so that not all genomic regions were completely sequenced. It is possible that the sequencing coverage of the present study had no sufficient power to identify de novo variants linked with SLE. ii) DNA in leukocytes may not be an ideal sample for studying monozygotic twins discordant for phenotypes (32,35). In pregnancy, most monozygotic twins are monochorionic. As they share the same blood circulation, it is possible that monozygotic twins share the same hematopoietic systems. Tissue samples displaying discordant phenotypes from monozygotic twins may be better for studying the discordant variants, since they are directly associated with the discordant phenotypes. iii) The analyzing tool and standard for WGS data used in the present study mainly focus on the functional variants, e.g. exonic missense variants. It did not sufficiently assess the variants in non-coding regions and may have missed the significant discordant variants of the monozygotic twins.

SLE is an autoimmune disease in humans. The mechanisms in monozygotic twins discordant for autoimmune disease still remain to be fully elucidated. As for SLE, Javierre et al (36) reported DNA methylation pattern changes in a study of monozygotic twins discordant for SLE. In the present study, CNVs changes of SLE pathway genes were identified in monozygotic twins discordant for SLE. The above results indicated that epigenetic changes and CNV changes in SLE pathway genes may be responsible for monozygotic twins discordant for SLE. The detailed mechanisms require further investigation.

The present study employed the WGS technique to reveal discordant variants and CNVs in monozygotic twins discordant for SLE. The results suggested that CNV changes may be associated with the occurrence of monozygotic twins discordant for SLE. The results of the present study will be helpful in the future analysis of mechanisms of monozygotic twins discordant for SLE.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the Foundation of Medical Discipline Leaders Program of the Health and Family Planning Commission of Yunnan Province (grant no. D-201668), the Personnel Training Project of Yunnan Province (grant no. 2017HB043), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 81560126 and 81460424), the Joint Special Research Funds of Kunming Medical University [grant no. 2017FE468(−010)] and the Innovation Team of Yunnan Province (grant no. 2017HC009).

Availability of data and materials

The analyzed data sets generated during the study and primer sequences are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

FC, ZL and RL performed the experiments and analyzed the data. ZL and YL wrote the manuscript and designed the study. The final version of the manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province (Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology). Written informed consent was from the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Mirabelli G, Cannarile F, Bruni C, Vagelli R, De Luca R and Carli L: One year in review 2015: Systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 33:414–425. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

2 

Petri M: Review of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 31(245–254): vi2005.

3 

Petri M: Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 16:847–858. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ahmad YA and Bruce IN: Genetic epidemiology: Systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. 3:331–336. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Mak A and Tay SH: Environmental factors, toxicants and systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Mol Sci. 15:16043–16056. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Mok CC, Kwok RC and Yip PS: Effect of renal disease on the standardized mortality ratio and life expectancy of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 65:2154–2160. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Bodaño A, Amarelo J, González A, Gómez-Reino JJ and Conde C: Novel DNASE I mutations related to systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 50:4070–4071. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Leng RX, Wang W, Cen H, Zhou M, Feng CC, Zhu Y, Yang XK, Yang M, Zhai Y, Li BZ, et al: Gene-gene and gene-sex epistatic interactions of MiR146a, IRF5, IKZF1, ETS1 and IL21 in systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 7:e510902012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Wang C, Sandling JK, Hagberg N, Berggren O, Sigurdsson S, Karlberg O, Rönnblom L, Eloranta ML and Syvänen AC: Genome-wide profiling of target genes for the systemic lupus erythematosus-associated transcription factors IRF5 and STAT4. Ann Rheum Dis. 72:96–103. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Yang W, Shen N, Ye DQ, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Qian XX, Hirankarn N, Ying D, Pan HF, Mok CC, et al: Genome-wide association study in Asian populations identifies variants in ETS1 and WDFY4 associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS Genet. 6:e10008412010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Remmers EF, Plenge RM, Lee AT, Graham RR, Hom G, Behrens TW, de Bakker PI, Le JM, Lee HS, Batliwalla F, et al: STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 357:977–986. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ketelaar ME, Hofstra EM and Hayden MR: What monozygotic twins discordant for phenotype illustrate about mechanisms influencing genetic forms of neurodegeneration. Clin Genet. 81:325–333. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Maiti S, Kumar KH, Castellani CA, O'Reilly R and Singh SM: Ontogenetic de novo copy number variations (CNVs) as a source of genetic individuality: Studies on two families with MZD twins for schizophrenia. PLoS One. 6:e171252011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Silva S, Martins Y, Matias A and Blickstein I: Why are monozygotic twins different? J Perinat Med. 39:195–202. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Kondo S, Schutte BC, Richardson RJ, Bjork BC, Knight AS, Watanabe Y, Howard E, de Lima RL, Daack-Hirsch S, Sander A, et al: Mutations in IRF6 cause Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. Nat Genet. 32:285–289. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Sobreira NL, Cirulli ET, Avramopoulos D, Wohler E, Oswald GL, Stevens EL, Ge D, Shianna KV, Smith JP, Maia JM, et al: Whole-genome sequencing of a single proband together with linkage analysis identifies a Mendelian disease gene. PLoS Genet. 6:e10009912010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Petersen BS, Spehlmann ME, Raedler A, Stade B, Thomsen I, Rabionet R, Rosenstiel P, Schreiber S and Franke A: Whole genome and exome sequencing of monozygotic twins discordant for Crohn's disease. BMC Genomics. 15:5642014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tang J, Fan Y, Li H, Xiang Q, Zhang DF, Li Z, He Y, Liao Y, Wang Y, He F, et al: Whole-genome sequencing of monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia indicates multiple genetic risk factors for schizophrenia. J Genet Genomics. 44:295–306. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Raczy C, Petrovski R, Saunders CT, Chorny I, Kruglyak S, Margulies EH, Chuang HY, Källberg M, Kumar SA, Liao A, et al: Isaac: Ultra-fast whole-genome secondary analysis on Illumina sequencing platforms. Bioinformatics. 29:2041–2043. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Cingolani P, Platts A, le Wang L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, Land SJ, Lu X and Ruden DM: A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 6:80–92. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Boeva V, Popova T, Bleakley K, Chiche P, Cappo J, Schleiermacher G, Janoueix-Lerosey I, Delattre O and Barillot E: Control-FREEC: A tool for assessing copy number and allelic content using next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 28:423–425. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Chen X, Schulz-Trieglaff O, Shaw R, Barnes B, Schlesinger F, Källberg M, Cox AJ, Kruglyak S and Saunders CT: Manta: Rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics. 32:1220–1222. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Smigielski EM, Sirotkin K, Ward M and Sherry ST: DbSNP: A database of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:352–355. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

1000 Genomes Project Consortium, . Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, Korbel JO, Marchini JL, McCarthy S, McVean GA and Abecasis GR: A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 526:68–74. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Ng PC and Henikoff S: SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:3812–3814. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, Kondrashov AS and Sunyaev SR: A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 7:248–249. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G and Mesirov JP: Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 29:24–26. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Thorvaldsdottir H, Robinson JT and Mesirov JP: Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): High-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14:178–192. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Schiettecatte F, Scott AF and Hamosh A: OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:D789–D798. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Reumers J, De Rijk P, Zhao H, Liekens A, Smeets D, Cleary J, Van Loo P, Van Den Bossche M, Catthoor K, Sabbe B, et al: Optimized filtering reduces the error rate in detecting genomic variants by short-read sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 30:61–68. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Baranzini SE, Mudge J, van Velkinburgh JC, Khankhanian P, Khrebtukova I, Miller NA, Zhang L, Farmer AD, Bell CJ, Kim RW, et al: Genome, epigenome and RNA sequences of monozygotic twins discordant for multiple sclerosis. Nature. 464:1351–1356. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Chaiyasap P, Kulawonganunchai S, Srichomthong C, Tongsima S, Suphapeetiporn K and Shotelersuk V: Whole genome and exome sequencing of monozygotic twins with trisomy 21, discordant for a congenital heart defect and epilepsy. PLoS One. 9:e1001912014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Solomon BD, Pineda-Alvarez DE, Hadley DW, Hansen NF, Kamat A, Donovan FX, Chandrasekharappa SC, Hong SK, Roessler E and Mullikin JC: NISC Comparative Sequencing Program: Exome sequencing and high-density microarray testing in monozygotic twin pairs discordant for features of VACTERL association. Mol Syndromol. 4:27–31. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Nielsen R, Paul JS, Albrechtsen A and Song YS: Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data. Nat Rev Genet. 12:443–451. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Erlich Y: Blood ties: Chimerism can mask twin discordance in high-throughput sequencing. Twin Res Hum Genet. 14:137–143. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Javierre BM, Fernandez AF, Richter J, Al-Shahrour F, Martin-Subero JI, Rodriguez-Ubreva J, Berdasco M, Fraga MF, O'Hanlon TP, Rider LG, et al: Changes in the pattern of DNA methylation associate with twin discordance in systemic lupus erythematosus. Genome Res. 20:170–179. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

June-2018
Volume 17 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Chen F, Li Z, Li R and Li Y: Whole‑genome sequencing of a monozygotic twin discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Med Rep 17: 8391-8396, 2018.
APA
Chen, F., Li, Z., Li, R., & Li, Y. (2018). Whole‑genome sequencing of a monozygotic twin discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus. Molecular Medicine Reports, 17, 8391-8396. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8912
MLA
Chen, F., Li, Z., Li, R., Li, Y."Whole‑genome sequencing of a monozygotic twin discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus". Molecular Medicine Reports 17.6 (2018): 8391-8396.
Chicago
Chen, F., Li, Z., Li, R., Li, Y."Whole‑genome sequencing of a monozygotic twin discordant for systemic lupus erythematosus". Molecular Medicine Reports 17, no. 6 (2018): 8391-8396. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.8912