Open Access

Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction‑mediated miR‑205 enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells

  • Authors:
    • Dingwen Qin
    • Haige Li
    • Honglin Xie
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 24, 2018     https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9316
  • Pages: 3242-3250
  • Copyright: © Qin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non‑coding ~20 nucleotides long sequences that function in the initiation and development of a number of cancers. Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) is an effective method for microRNA delivery. The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential roles of UTMD‑mediated miRNA (miR)‑205 delivery in the development of prostate cancer (PCa). In the present study, miR‑205 expression was examined by reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. miR‑205 mimics were transfected into PC‑3 cells using the UTMD method, and the PC‑3 cells were also treated with cisplatin. Cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion abilities were detected using Cell Counting kit‑8, flow cytometry, wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. In addition, the protein expression levels of caspase‑9, cleaved‑caspase 9, cytochrome c (cytoc), epithelial (E)‑cadherin, matrix metalloproteinase‑9 (MMP‑9), phosphorylated (p)‑extracellular signal‑regulated kinase (ERK) and ERK were measured by western blot analysis. The results of the present study demonstrated that miR‑205 expression was low in human PCa cell lines compared with healthy cells and that UTMD‑mediated miR‑205 delivery inhibited PCa cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis modulated by cisplatin compared with UTMD‑mediated miR‑negative control group and miR‑205‑treated group. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that UTMD‑mediated miR‑205 transfection increased the expression of caspase‑9, cleaved‑caspase 9, cytochrome c and E‑cadherin, and decreased the expression of MMP‑9 and p‑ERK. Therefore, UTMD‑mediated miR‑205 delivery may be a promising method for the treatment of PCa.

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignant tumor in the male genitourinary system, and the incidence of cancer is fifth in the world (1). It is well known that the incidence of PCa in China ranks one hundred seventieth in the country, which has been rising from 2008 to 2012 (2,3), speculating that the number of people with PCa will continue to increase in the future (2).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of non-coding small RNAs that regulate gene expression in a post-transcriptional manner (4,5). Recent studies have demonstrated that miRNA regulation serves a role in health and disease (6,7). Abnormal expression of miRNAs may lead to initiation and development of tumors (810). Previous studies have also indicated that a number of miRNAs may be delivered to human cells by food intake, therefore, miRNAs are relevant to human health (11,12). It has also been demonstrated that incidence, development, treatment, prognosis and recurrence of PCa are associated with abnormal expression of certain miRNAs (1315). The authors of the present study hypothesized that miRNAs may aid in our understanding of pathogenesis and the basis for molecular diagnosis of PCa, and have attempted to evaluate the prognosis and to suggest novel treatment methods for PCa.

Microbubble ultrasound contrast agent is a safe, novel, stable and efficient gene transfer vector (1315). In this technique, the gene of interest is contained in a microbubble, and when the microbubble breaks itis released. Microbubble destruction induced by vibration increases the permeability of local cells and produces an irreversible sound hole, which may promote entry of a gene into the nucleus and increase its expression and transfection efficiency (16). Furthermore, microbubbles transport genes or drugs efficiently to avoid degradation by blood endonucleases and other lytic enzymes (17,18). By using this method of ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD), genes and drugs may reach target tissues or organs through the blood circulatory system. The goal of UTMD is to reduce the extent of adverse systemic responses (19). Research and clinical studies of UTMD primarily focus on cancer, anti-tumor therapies, thrombosis, thrombolytic therapy, inflammation, drug delivery and gene therapies (20,21). It has been widely demonstrated that microbubble-based techniques may improve gene transfection efficiency (reviewed in 20) and are considered as a novel approach to cancer treatment (18).

Based on the potential role of miR-205 in the molecular mechanism underlying PCa development (22), the aim of the present study was to investigate the transfection efficiency and safety of UTMD-mediated transfection of miR-205 to PC-3 cells. Furthermore, the present study attempted to investigate the role served by miRNAs in the development of PCa and the feasibility of UTMD-mediated gene therapy.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

RWPE-1 normal prostate cells and PCa cell lines VCaP, LNCaP, PC-3, and DU145 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). All cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 2 mM L-glutamine in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.

Cell treatment

For cisplatin treatment, DU145 and PC-3 cells were seeded (1×105 cells/well) in six-well plates, and treated with 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15 µg/ml cisplatin (Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) at room temperature for 48 h. For miRNA transfection, the miR-205 mimics and miRNA negative controls (miR-NC) were purchased from Shanghai Gene Chem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). PC-3 and DU145 cells were seeded (1×105 cells/well) in six-well plates and transfected with miR-205 mimics (target sequence: 5′-GATTTCAGTGGAGTGAAGTTCAGGAGGCAT-3′, C=1.6 µg/µl) and miR-NC (target sequence: 5′-CCAGTATTAACTGTGCTGCTGA-3′, C=1.3 µg/µl) using Lipofectamine® 3000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 48 h according to the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, cells were harvested for further experiments.

miRNA-microbubble preparation and transfection. Microbubbles were obtained by sonication of an aqueous dispersion comprising 1,2-distearoyl-3-trimethylammoniumpropane (0.4 mg/ml; Avanti Polar Lipids Inc., Alabaster, AL, USA) with perfluoropropane gas, polyethyleneglycol-2000 stearate (1 mg/ml; Avanti Polar Lipids Inc.), and distearoylphosphatidylcholine (2 mg/ml, DSPCa; Avanti Polar Lipids Inc.) (23). Microbubbles were examined by an inverted microscope (Guangmi, GMSP-5, Shanghai, China; www.shgmyq.com/). miR-205 and miR-NC were separately added into the microbubbles, and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. PC-3 cells were transfected with a mixture of miR-205/miR-NC and microbubbles using Lipofectamine® 3000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc) for 48 h according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated from cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocol. First-strand cDNA was reverse transcribed from the total RNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The temperature and time of the reaction were 85°C for 5 min, 4°C for 5 min. The qPCR assay was performed using SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The following thermocycling conditions were used for the PCR: Initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec; 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 sec, 60°C for 34 sec. Primers for target genes and U6 (the internal loading control) were designed using the Primer Premier software version 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The following primer sequences were used for PCR: miR-205 forwad, 5′-TGGGCTGAGTCCCTCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAGGGACGGGTGATGGGCAGATTGG-3′; U6 forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ and reverse, 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ (reverse). Expression levels were normalized to U6, and relative expression values were calculated using the 2−∆∆Cq method (24).

Western blot analysis

Total protein was extracted from cells using ProteoPrep Total Extraction Sample kit (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). Cell lysates were collected following centrifugation at 12,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min. Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) was used to detect protein concentrations. Each protein sample (30 µg) was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The PVDF membranes were treated with the following primary antibodies: Caspase 9 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab25758; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), cleaved-caspase 9 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab2324; Abcam), cytochrome c (cyto c; 1:1,000; cat. no. ab28146; Abcam), epithelial (E)-cadherin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab133597; Abcam), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9; 1:1,000; cat no. ab73734; Abcam); phosphorylated (p)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. 9101; New England BioLabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA), ERK1/2 (1:1,000; cat. no. ab17942; Abcam), β-actin (1:1,000; cat. no. ab8226; Abcam) overnight at 4°C. The following day, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish conjugated-conjugated secondary antibody (Donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L, 1:7,000, cat no. ab98488; Goat anti-mouse IgG H&L, 1:8,000, cat no. ab150117; Rabbit anti-mouse IgG H&L, 1:8,000, cat no. ab175743; Abcam) for 1 h at room temperature. Expression was visualized using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Detection kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

Cell viability

Cell viability was measured using the Cell Counting Kit (CCK)-8 assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Cells (1×104 cells/well) were seeded into a 96-well plate and cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 48 h. CCK-8 solution (10 µl) was added into each well and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 450 nm with a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).

Flow cytometry

After PC-3 cells (1×106 cells/ml) were treated with: i) 1X PBS (blank); ii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml); iii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + scrambled-miRNA (miR-NC; 100 µg) + UTMD also referred as UTMD-mediated miR-NC group; iv) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg) + UTMD; v) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg), also referred as miR-205 group; and vi) cisplatin (2 µg/ml)+UTMD. Cells were digested with 0.25% EDTA-trypsin (Weike; Shanghai, China; www.weike21.com/), and dispersed. Cell suspension was centrifuged in 500 × g at 37°C for 5 min, and collected. Subsequently, cells were washed with 1X PBS, and re-suspended using 1X binding buffer and double stained with the Annexin V-FITC/PI Staining kit (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Finally, apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry {Taomsun, TMS-2050 [FlowJo 10; Version: 10.2 64 (Bit), Suzhou, Jiangsu, China}. Apoptotic rates of treated PC-3 cells were quantified by graphPad prism 7 software.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. Cell apoptosis was detected using the In-Situ Cell Death Detection kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells (1×105 cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates, and treated with: i) 1X PBS (blank); ii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml); iii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + scrambled-miRNA (miR-NC; 100 µg) + UTMD, also referred as UTMD-mediated miR-NC group; iv) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg)+UTMD; v) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg), also referred as miR-205 group; and vi) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + UTMD. Subsequently, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 30 min, permeabilized in 0.1% Triton X-100, and treated with 50 µl fluorescein-12-dUTP or 60 µl DAPI at room temperature for 30 min. The fluorescence of cells in the middle of each well was detected by fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 100 M; Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany).

Wound-healing assay

The wound-healing assay was used to determine the effects of UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery on cell migration. Treated cells were seeded in the six-well plates (1×106 cells/well) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium for 12 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. A 100 µl pipette tip was used to create a straight scratch and the images captured were used as the baseline. Subsequently, cells were treated as mentioned earlier. Finally, cells were washed three times with 1X PBS to remove the suspended cells, and new images were captured.

Invasion assay. Cell invasion assay was performed using Transwell chambers. Matrigel inserts were placed in the upper compartment and incubated for 30 min in an incubator at 5% CO2 and 37°C. A 200 µl solution with serum-free medium containing treated cells (5×105 cells/well) was seeded in the upper compartment. The lower compartment was filled with 600 µl medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Following 24 h of incubation, the migratory cells were fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet at room temperature for 25 min. Cell numbers were counted in five representative fields and images were captured under a fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The differences between groups were assesses by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

miR-205 expression is decreased in human PCa cells

RT-qPCR assays were performed to detect the expression level of miR-205 in the normal prostate cell line RWPE-1 and in the PCa cell lines VCaP, LnCaP, PC-3 and DU145. The results indicated that the expression levels of miR-205 were significantly lower in PCa cells compared with RWPE-1 cells (P<0.001; Fig. 1).

miR-205 inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation

The effects of miR-205 overexpression on PCa cells were detected. PC-3 and DU145 cells were treated with PBS (Blank), miRNA-NC (Control) and miR-205 mimics (miR-205). RT-qPCR results demonstrated that miR-205 expression was significantly increased in the miR-205 mimics treated groups compared with the respective control groups (P<0.001; Fig. 2A and B). In addition, miR-205 mimics-treated PC-3 and DU145 cells exhibited a significant reduction in proliferation compared with the respective control groups at 48 h (Fig. 2C and D).

UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection inhibits cisplatin-modulated cell proliferation

Cationic microbubble technology is an effective method for miRNA delivery (25). As presented in Fig. 3A, the microbubbles were imaged using an inverted microscope. It is proven that cisplatin has an anti-PCa effect (26). In this experiment, to screen for the optimum cisplatin concentration to treat DU145 and PC-3 cells, CCK-8 assay was performed to detect viability of DU145 and PC-3 cells treated with 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 15 µg/ml cisplatin. The results demonstrated that cisplatin markedly decreased the viability of DU145 and PC-3 cells in a dose dependent manner, compared with the untreated control group (Fig. 3B). Additionally, cisplatin inhibited the viability of PC-3 cells more than that of DU145 cells. The IC50 of cisplatin was 2 µg/ml in PC-3 cells. Therefore, subsequent experiments were performed using 2 µg/ml cisplatin in PC-3 cells.

To investigate whether UTMD-mediated miR-205 serves a role in PCa, PC-3 cells were treated with: i) 1X PBS (blank); ii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml); iii) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + scrambled-miRNA (miR-NC; 100 µg) + UTMD; iv) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg)+UTMD, also referred as UTMD-mediated miR-NC group; v) cisplatin (2 µg/ml) + miR-205 (100 µg), also referred as miR-205 group; and vi) cisplatin (6 µg/ml) + UTMD. RT-qPCR results indicated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection significantly increased miR-205 expression compared with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC group and the miR-205 group (P<0.001; Fig. 3C). CCK-8 results indicated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection significantly inhibited the proliferation of PC-3 cells compared with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC group and the miR-205 group (Fig. 3D).

UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery promotes cisplatin-modulated apoptosis

Flow cytometric analysis results demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection significantly increased apoptotic rates in PC-3 cells compared with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC transfected group and the miR-205 group (Fig. 4A and B). In addition, the results of the TUNEL assay indicated that about 30 apoptotic cells were stained by fluorescence in UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection group, which was higher compared with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC transfection group and with the miR-205 group (Fig. 4C).

UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection inhibits PC-3 cell migration and invasion modulated by cisplatin. In order to further investigate the biological significance of UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection in PCa cells, wound-healing and Matrigel invasion assays were performed. The results demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery decreasedPC-3 cell migration and invasion in cells co-treated with cisplatin compared with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC transfection group and with the miR-205 group (Fig. 5A and B).

UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection increases expression of caspase-9, cleaved-caspase 9, cytoc and E-cadherin, and decreases expression of MMP-9 and p-ERK

To investigate the potential mechanism of UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery on the inhibition of apoptosis and invasion of PC-3 cells modulated by cisplatin, the protein expression levels of apoptosis-associated genes (including caspase-9, cleaved-caspase 9 and cytoc), E-cadherin, MMP-9, ERK and p-ERK were evaluated using western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that in comparison with the UTMD-mediated miR-NC transfection group and with the miR-205 group, UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection notably upregulated the expression of caspase-9, cleaved-caspase 9 and cytoc, which suggested that miR-205 may promote cell apoptosis. UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection also resulted in increased protein expression levels of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and in decreased expression of MMP-9, which suggested that miR-205 may inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Furthermore, results demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery markedly decreased p-ERK expression, which suggested that miR-205 may downregulate the ERK signaling pathway (Fig. 6).

Discussion

miRNAs serve roles in proliferation, differentiation, cell cycle, apoptosis, migration and invasion (27,28). A number of miRNAs have been previously identified that may serve roles as novel markers for diagnosis of multifarious tumors (29). miRNAs, acting as oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, may become novel therapies against cancer (30). miR-205 is a highly conserved miRNA that was identified based on the conserved sequence of mouse and Takifugu rubripes (31), and was subsequently identified in human and zebrafish (32,33). Previous studies have indicated that miR-205 serves roles in the development of various tumors, including colorectal cancer, PCa, adeno carcinoma, endometrial cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (34). In the present study, miR-205 was down-regulated in PCa cells and inhibited PCa cell proliferation.

UTMD is a novel, safe, non-invasive technology (35). Compared with viral vector transfection technology, the combined use of UTMD and non-viral vectors is a safer and more effective method of increasing the gene and drug transfection efficiencies (3638). UTMD involves the attachment of genes to microbubbles that may subsequently be injected and circulated through blood vessels and then destroyed by ultrasound insonation at the target site (39). Microbubble destruction leads to increased capillary permeability, generating holes in the cell membrane releasing the ‘payload’, which is subsequently incorporated intracellularly (40).

Previous studies have demonstrated that miRNAs can enhance cisplatin anti-PCa effects (4143). The present study evaluated UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery in PCa cells to determine whether this delivery system facilitated gene delivery in PCa cells, with the aim to investigate alterations in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion, and to elucidate the regulatory functions of miR-205 in PCa. The results of the present study demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection inhibited PCa cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and promoted apoptosis modulated by cisplatin. In addition, the results demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery upregulated the protein expression levels of apoptosis-associated genes caspase-9, cleaved-caspase 9 and cytoc.

UTMD is a novel tool for organ-specific gene delivery through the progress of sonoporation allowing for efficient macromolecule transfer into cells (44). In the present study, UTMD-mediated miR-205 significantly inhibited PCa cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and induced apoptosis, compared with miR-205. The results suggested that UTMD-mediated delivery of miRNA is a potential platform for PCa therapy.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is an information dissemination and aggregation pathway that mediates nuclear reactions caused by an extracellular signal. MAPK is composed of three main pathways, including ERK, JNK and p38 (45). ERK1 and ERK2 mediate extracellular signals into the nucleus through a signal transduction cascade, activating a series of effect or molecules in the nucleus, which regulate biological activities, including cell proliferation and apoptosis (46). A previous study demonstrated that receptor tyrosine-protein kinase ErbB2 inhibits miR-205 transcription through the Ras/Raf/dual specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase MEK/ERK pathway in breast cancer (47). miR-205 is involved in osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells via the DNA-binding protein SATB2/Runt-related transcription factor 2 and ERK/MAPK pathways (48). miR-205 is also reported to downregulate p-MAPK levels in breast cancer (49). Results from the present study demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection led to reduced p-ERK expression, which suggested that miR-205 may regulate ERK signaling pathway.

EMT has been hypothesized to be associated with tumor invasion and metastasis, and it is regulated by multiple biological molecules and signaling pathways (50). miRNAs are a class of non-coding RNAs, which can negatively regulate mRNA expression of target genes (51). One previous study demonstrated that certain miRNAs (miRNA-9, miRNA23b and miRNA-17-92) suppress the invasion and metastasis of cancer by regulating EMT-related factors (E-cadherin and MMP-9) (52). Up-regulation of E-cadherin increases intercellular adhesion (53) and it has been demonstrated that drugs significantly decrease the metastasis of lung cancer via down-regulation of MMP9 (54). A number of studies have demonstrated that ERK1/2 serves arole in the process of EMT in a number of tumors (5557). Another previous study demonstrated that miR-205 regulates invasion and migration of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma by AKT-mediated EMT (58). In the present study, UTMD-mediated miR-205 transfection upregulated the expression of E-cadherin and downregulated MMP-9 expression, suggesting that miR-205 may inhibit EMT in PC-3 cells. Therefore, UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery is a potential method of PCa treatment.

In conclusion, the present study used UTMD to successfully transfect PCa cells withmiR-205 mimics plasmid; the results demonstrated that cell proliferation, migration and invasion were suppressed, and apoptosis was increased, which may aid in future efforts of miRNA inhibition in vivo. Furthermore, the present study demonstrated that UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery increased the expression levels of E-cadherin and decreased the expression of MMP-9 and p-ERK, which suggested that the ERK signaling pathway may serve a role in the development and progression of PCa. UTMD-mediated miR-205 delivery may be a novel molecular targeted therapy for the treatment of PCa.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Siegel RL, Miller KD and Jemal A: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 66:7–30. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ren SC, Chen R and Sun YH: Prostate cancer research in China. Asian J Androl. 15:350–353. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Ye D and Zhu Y: Epidemiology of prostate cancer in China: An overview and clinical implication. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 53:249–252. 2015.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ibrahim SA, Hassan H and Götte M: MicroRNA regulation of proteoglycan function in cancer. FEBS J. 281:5009–5022. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Janga SC and Vallabhaneni S: MicroRNAs as post-transcriptional machines and their interplay with cellular networks. Adv Exp Med Biol. 722:59–74. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Guedes J, Cardoso AL and de Lima Pedroso MC: Involvement of microRNA in microglia-mediated immune response. Clin Dev Immunol. 2013:1868722013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Shukla GC, Singh J and Barik S: MicroRNAs: Processing, maturation, target recognition and regulatory functions. Mol Cell Pharmacol. 3:83–92. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Di Leva G, Garofalo M and Croce CM: MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 9:287–314. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

McGuire A, Brown JA and Kerin MJ: Metastatic breast cancer: The potential of miRNA for diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 34:145–155. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Tutar Y: miRNA and cancer; computational and experimental approaches. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 15:4292014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zhang L, Hou D, Chen X, Li D, Zhu L, Zhang Y, Li J, Bian Z, Liang X, Cai X, et al: Exogenous plant MIR168a specifically targets mammalian LDLRAP1: Evidence of cross-kingdom regulation by microRNA. Cell Res. 22:107–126. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Gismondi A, Di Marco G and Canini A: Detection of plant microRNAs in honey. PLoS One. 12:e01729812017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Gandellini P, Folini M and Zaffaroni N: Emerging role of microRNAs in prostate cancer: Implications for personalized medicine. Discov Med. 9:212–218. 2010.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Leite KR, Morais DR, Florez MG, Reis ST, Iscaife A, Viana N, Moura CM, Silva IA, Katz BS, Pontes J Jr, et al: The role of microRNAs 371 and 34a in androgen receptor control influencing prostate cancer behavior. Urol Oncol. 33(267): e15–22. 2015.

15 

Sun X, Liu Z, Yang Z, Xiao L, Wang F, He Y, Su P, Wang J and Jing B: Association of microRNA-126 expression with clinicopathological features and the risk of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Diagn Pathol. 8:2082013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Tinkov S, Bekeredjian R, Winter G and Coester C: Microbubbles as ultrasound triggered drug carriers. J Pharm Sci. 98:1935–1961. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Sanguino A, Lopez-Berestein G and Sood AK: Strategies for in vivo siRNA delivery in cancer. Mini Rev Med Chem. 8:248–255. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Ibsen S, Schutt CE and Esener S: Microbubble-mediated ultrasound therapy: A review of its potential in cancer treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 7:375–388. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Mayer CR, Geis NA, Katus HA and Bekeredjian R: Ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction for drug and gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 5:1121–1138. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Kiessling F, Fokong S, Koczera P, Lederle W and Lammers T: Ultrasound microbubbles for molecular diagnosis, therapy, and theranostics. J Nucl Med. 53:345–348. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Liu Y, Miyoshi H and Nakamura M: Encapsulated ultrasound microbubbles: Therapeutic application in drug/gene delivery. J Control Release. 114:89–99. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Srivastava A, Goldberger H, Dimtchev A, Ramalinga M, Chijioke J, Marian C, Oermann EK, Uhm S, Kim JS, Chen LN, et al: MicroRNA profiling in prostate cancer-the diagnostic potential of urinary miR-205 and miR-214. PLoS One. 8:e769942013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Leong-Poi H, Kuliszewski MA, Lekas M, Sibbald M, Teichert-Kuliszewska K, Klibanov AL, Stewart DJ and Lindner JR: Therapeutic arteriogenesis by ultrasound-mediated VEGF165 plasmid gene delivery to chronically ischemic skeletal muscle. Circ Res. 101:295–303. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Yang D, Gao YH, Tan KB, Zuo ZX, Yang WX, Hua X, Li PJ, Zhang Y and Wang G: Inhibition of hepatic fibrosis with artificial microRNA using ultrasound and cationic liposome-bearing microbubbles. Gene Ther. 20:1140–1148. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Kubota H, Fukuta K, Yamada K, Hirose M, Naruyama H, Yanai Y, Yamada Y, Watase H, Kawai N, Tozawa K and Yasui T: Feasibility of metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur-uracil, cisplatin, and dexamethasone for docetaxel-refractory prostate cancer. J Rural Med. 12:112–119. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Garzon R, Calin GA and Croce CM: MicroRNAs in cancer. Annu Rev Med. 60:167–179. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Shenouda SK and Alahari SK: MicroRNA function in cancer: Oncogene or a tumor suppressor? Cancer Metastasis Rev. 28:369–378. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Tricoli JV and Jacobson JW: MicroRNA: Potential for cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Cancer Res. 67:4553–4555. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Rupaimoole R, Calin GA, Lopez-Berestein G and Sood AK: miRNA deregulation in cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Discov. 6:235–246. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Lim LP, Glasner ME, Yekta S, Burge CB and Bartel DP: Vertebrate microRNA genes. Science. 299:15402003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Wienholds E, Kloosterman WP, Miska E, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Berezikov E, de Bruijn E, Horvitz HR, Kauppinen S and Plasterk RH: MicroRNA expression in zebrafish embryonic development. Science. 309:310–311. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Landgraf P, Rusu M, Sheridan R, Sewer A, Iovino N, Aravin A, Pfeffer S, Rice A, Kamphorst AO, Landthaler M, et al: A mammalian microRNA expression atlas based on small RNA library sequencing. Cell. 129:1401–1414. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Mao Y, Wu S, Zhao R and Deng Q: MiR-205 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by activation of AKT signalling. J Int Med Res. 44:231–240. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

35 

Zhang L, Sun Z, Ren P, Lee RJ, Xiang G, Lv Q, Han W, Wang J, Ge S and Xie M: Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) assisted delivery of shRNA against PHD2 into H9C2 cells. PLoS One. 10:e01346292015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Chen H and Hwang JH: Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction for chemotherapeutic drug delivery to solid tumors. J Ther Ultrasound. 1:102013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Chen ZY, Lin Y, Yang F, Jiang L and Ge Sp: Gene therapy for cardiovascular disease mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 11:112013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Wan C, Li F and Li H: Gene therapy for ocular diseases meditated by ultrasound and microbubbles (Review). Mol Med Rep. 12:4803–4814. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

39 

Ma J, Du LF, Chen M, Wang HH, Xing LX, Jing LF and Li YH: Drug-loaded nano-microcapsules delivery system mediated by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction: A promising therapy method. Biomed Rep. 1:506–510. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Nande R, Howard CM and Claudio PP: Ultrasound-mediated oncolytic virus delivery and uptake for increased therapeutic efficacy: State of art. Oncolytic Virother. 4:193–205. 2015.PubMed/NCBI

41 

Liu F, Wang J, Fu Q, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu J, Huang J and Lv X: VEGF-activated miR-144 regulates autophagic survival of prostate cancer cells against Cisplatin. Tumour Biol. Nov 13–2015.(Epub ahead of print).

42 

Pennati M, Lopergolo A, Profumo V, De Cesare M, Sbarra S, Valdagni R, Zaffaroni N, Gandellini P and Folini M: miR-205 impairs the autophagic flux and enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 87:579–597. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Zhou P, Ma L, Zhou J, Jiang M, Rao E, Zhao Y and Guo F: miR-17-92 plays an oncogenic role and conveys chemo-resistance to cisplatin in human prostate cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 48:1737–1748. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Zheng X, Ji P and Hu J: Sonoporation using microbubbles promotes lipofectamine-mediated siRNA transduction to rat retina. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 11:147–152. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Seger R and Krebs EG: The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J. 9:726–735. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Sun Y, Liu WZ, Liu T, Feng X, Yang N and Zhou HF: Signaling pathway of MAPK/ERK in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, senescence and apoptosis. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 35:600–604. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Hasegawa T, Adachi R, Iwakata H, Takeno T, Sato K and Sakamaki T: ErbB2 signaling epigenetically suppresses microRNA-205 transcription via Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in breast cancer. FEBS Open Bio. 7:1154–1165. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Hu N, Feng C, Jiang Y, Miao Q and Liu H: Regulative effect of Mir-205 on osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs): Possible Role of SATB2/Runx2 and ERK/MAPK Pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 16:10491–10506. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Iorio MV, Casalini P, Piovan C, Di Leva G, Merlo A, Triulzi T, Menard S, Croce CM and Tagliabue E: microRNA-205 regulates HER3 in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 69:2195–2200. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA and Thiery JP: EMT: 2016. Cell. 166:21–45. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

51 

Schwarzenbach H: The clinical relevance of circulating, exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers for cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 15:1159–1169. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Lin CW, Kao SH and Yang PC: The miRNAs and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancers. Curr Pharm Des. 20:5309–5318. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Pieters T and van Roy F: Role of cell-cell adhesion complexes in embryonic stem cell biology. J Cell Sci. 127:2603–2613. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Li L, Wang S, Yang X, Long S, Xiao S, Wu W and Hann SS: Traditional Chinese medicine, Fuzheng KangAi decoction, inhibits metastasis of lung cancer cells through the STAT3/MMP9 pathway. Mol Med Rep. 16:2461–2468. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Ha GH, Park JS and Breuer EK: TACC3 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) through the activation of PI3K/Akt and ERK signaling pathways. Cancer Lett. 332:63–73. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Pan H, Jiang T, Cheng N, Wang Q, Ren S, Li X, Zhao C, Zhang L, Cai W and Zhou C: Long non-coding RNA BC087858 induces non-T790M mutation acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs by activating PI3K/AKT and MEK/ERK pathways and EMT in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. 7:49948–49960. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Zhang H, Sun JD, Yan LJ and Zhao XP: PDGF-D/PDGFRβ promotes tongue squamous carcinoma cell (TSCC) progression via activating p38/AKT/ERK/EMT signal pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 478:845–851. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Wang B, Lv K, Chen W, Zhao J, Luo J, Wu J, Li Z, Qin H, Wong TS, Yang W, et al: miR-375 and miR-205 regulate the invasion and migration of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma synergistically via AKT-Mediated EMT. Biomed Res Int. 2016:96527892016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2018
Volume 18 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1791-2997
Online ISSN:1791-3004

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Qin D, Li H and Xie H: Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction‑mediated miR‑205 enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 18: 3242-3250, 2018.
APA
Qin, D., Li, H., & Xie, H. (2018). Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction‑mediated miR‑205 enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells. Molecular Medicine Reports, 18, 3242-3250. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9316
MLA
Qin, D., Li, H., Xie, H."Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction‑mediated miR‑205 enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 18.3 (2018): 3242-3250.
Chicago
Qin, D., Li, H., Xie, H."Ultrasound‑targeted microbubble destruction‑mediated miR‑205 enhances cisplatin cytotoxicity in prostate cancer cells". Molecular Medicine Reports 18, no. 3 (2018): 3242-3250. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9316