Weissella cibaria CMU exerts an anti‑inflammatory effect by inhibiting Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans‑induced NF‑κB activation in macrophages
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 15, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11512
- Pages: 4143-4150
-
Copyright: © Kim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Inflammation occurs in defense against various external insults and metabolic products, and results in erythema, edema, fever, pain and dysfunction due to the activation of numerous inflammatory mediators (1). It is a local protective response to injury and infection; however, excessive or persistent inflammation leads to chronic inflammatory diseases, including periodontitis (2). Periodontitis is a common disease of the oral cavity that involves chronic inflammation of the supporting tissue around the teeth; it is characterized by alveolar bone destruction and high concentrations of periodontal bacteria (3). Therefore, regulation of the inflammatory response in host cells has been proposed as a method for controlling the progression of periodontitis (4). Gram-negative bacteria, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Tannerella forsythia, are well-known periodontitis-associated pathogens (5); they stimulate periodontal cells to produce various inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)1β and IL6, and induce cellular immune inflammatory responses, thereby destroying periodontal tissue (6). In particular, A. actinomycetemcomitans, a facultative anaerobic, gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium, is a major causative agent of localized aggressive periodontitis (7,8). It expresses various virulence factors, including a powerful leukotoxin, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cell surface-associated materials, enzymes and less well-defined virulence factors that modulate the activity of host defenses (9–12).
Among immune cells, macrophages play a pivotal role in inflammation by releasing inflammatory mediators, including proinflammatory cytokines (13). Macrophages are activated by periodontal pathogens and induce inflammatory responses through the NF-κB pathway (14). NF-κB, a transcription factor, is normally sequestered in the cytoplasm in a complex with NF-κB inhibitor α (IκBα) (15). Periodontal pathogens activate IκBα kinase (IKK)α and IKKβ via phosphorylation, allowing them to phosphorylate IκBα. This disrupts the stable complex between NF-κB and IκBα, enabling the translocation of the NF-κB p65 subunit into the nucleus to activate the transcription of proinflammatory genes (15). Consequently, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is expressed, and nitric oxide (NO) and proinflammatory cytokines (16), including IL1β and IL6, are secreted to induce inflammatory responses (17). Thus, inhibiting NF-κB activation is an important therapeutic goal for various inflammatory diseases.
Inflammation is involved in the pathological processes of a number of diseases. Recently, periodontal pathogens have been implicated in systemic conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, premature birth and Alzheimers disease (18–20). Therefore, substances capable of modulating the expression of various inflammatory mediators in response to these pathogens are promising candidate treatments to prevent and suppress not only periodontitis but also systemic disease. Various antibiotics, including minocycline, doxycycline, metronidazole and tetracycline, have been used to treat periodontal inflammation (21). However, as these drugs have a number of adverse effects, including hypersensitivity, and can result in antibiotic resistance, the development of alternative therapeutic agents is actively under way (22).
Over the last few years, researchers have reported the benefits of using probiotics to maintain oral health (23,24). Probiotics are living microorganisms that confer health benefits on their host organisms when consumed in appropriate amounts (25). Effects on oral conditions, such as dental caries, periodontitis and bad breath, have been reported for a few probiotics, including Streptococcus salivarius, Lactobacillus reuteri and Weissella cibaria (26–28). In particular, W. cibaria was first classified in a taxonomic study in 2002 and has been denoted as the dominant species in fermented foods, including kimchi (29). Notably, some W. cibaria strains are reported to possess stronger immunomodulatory activity than the commercially available strain (30,31).
The W. cibaria Chonnam Medical University (CMU) strain (oraCMU) was isolated from the oral cavity and is an effective oral care probiotic (32). OraCMU inhibits the growth of periodontal pathogens and the production of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL6 and IL8, in oral epithelial cells (33). Furthermore, oraCMU was recently reported to reduce periodontal tissue destruction by regulating the production of inflammatory cytokines in a periodontitis mouse model (34).
However, the mechanism by which oraCMU inhibits inflammation caused by periodontal pathogens has yet to be elucidated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of oraCMU on the production of inflammatory mediators in response to the periodontal pathogen A. actinomycetemcomitans in RAW 264.7 macrophages and explore its molecular mechanism of action.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and sample preparation
A. actinomycetemcomitans (ATCC 33384, American Type Culture Collection) was provided by the Laboratory of Oral Biochemistry (School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Korea) and oraCMU was provided by OraPharm Inc. A. actinomycetemcomitans was grown anaerobically (85% N2, 10% H2 and 5% CO2) in tryptic soy broth supplemented with yeast extract (1 mg/ml) and 10% horse serum (HyClone; Cytiva) at 37°C. Bacteria in the logarithmic growth phase were used in the experiments. The bacteria were harvested, washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended in PBS in 10-fold concentrated volumes. To obtain inactivated A. actinomycetemcomitans, the bacteria were exposed to 0.5% formalin for 30 min at 4°C and inactivation was confirmed by agar plating. The optical density (OD) of the formalin-inactivated bacterial suspension was measured at 600 nm on a microplate reader (Sunrise™; Tecan Group, Ltd.) and the suspension was diluted to an OD of 1, which corresponded to 1×108 colony forming units (CFUs)/ml. To evaluate its potential anti-inflammatory effects, oraCMU was grown in DeMan, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth (Difco; BD Biosciences) at 37°C for 16 h under aerobic conditions. OraCMU was subcultured twice in MRS broth before each experiment. Bacterial cultures were harvested, washed twice with PBS and then resuspended in antibiotic-free Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).
Cell culture
The RAW 264.7 macrophage line (TIB-71, ATCC) was maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cells were subcultured and plated at 80% confluency. Antibiotic-free DMEM medium was used for the coculture of RAW 264.7 macrophages and live oraCMU.
Bacterial infection
To prepare live oraCMU, bacterial cultures were harvested, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in antibiotic-free DMEM medium. The OD was measured at 600 nm and the suspension was diluted to obtain an OD of 0.5, which corresponded to 5×108 CFU/ml. For each experiment, RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded in 24-well plates at 5×105 cells/well. After 24 h, the medium was removed and the macrophages were incubated with various doses of live oraCMU [multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 0.1, 1 and 10] in antibiotic-free DMEM medium and 1×107 CFU/ml A. actinomycetemcomitans cells, and the cocultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. For mRNA analysis, oraCMU and A. actinomycetemcomitans were added for 4 or 6 h. For western blotting, 1×106 cells/ml were seeded in 60-mm dishes and oraCMU and A. actinomycetemcomitans were added for 10 min, 30 min, 1 h or 16 h.
Cell viability assays
The cytotoxicity of live oraCMU was measured using the MTS assay (CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit; Promega Corporation). RAW 264.7 macrophages were seeded in a 96-well culture plate at 1×105 cells/well and incubated overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. Then, cells were treated with various concentrations of oraCMU (MOIs =0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1,000). After incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the media was changed to remove almost all oraCMU and only macrophages were left in each well. After adding only DMEM, MTS was added to each well at a 1:5 ratio and the plate was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 2 h. The absorbance was measured at 490 nm on a microplate reader.
NO quantification assays
RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 5×105 cells/well in 24-well culture plates. After 24 h at 37°C, the cells were treated with A. actinomycetemcomitans and various concentrations of oraCMU (MOIs =0.1, 1 and 10). Following incubation for 24 h at 37°C, the supernatants were assessed by mixing with the same volume of Griess reagent (Promega Corporation). The absorbance was measured at 540 nm on a microplate reader and the nitrite concentration was calculated using a sodium nitrite calibration curve.
Reverse transcription-quantitative (RTq)-PCR
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturers protocol, and quantified spectrophotometrically. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of RNA using PrimeScript RT Reagent kit (Takara Bio, Inc.). RT-qPCR was performed on a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) using the AccuPower PCR PreMix kit (Bioneer Corporation). Each RT-PCR reaction used 0.5 µM of each primer. Each cycle consisted of denaturation at 94°C (30 sec), annealing at 55°C (30 sec) and extension at 72°C (60 sec). The primer sequences were as follows: IL6 forward, 5′-GATGGATGCTACCAAACTGGA-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTGAAGGACTCTGGCTTTG-3′ (142 bp); IL1β forward, 5′-GAAAGACGGCACACCCACCCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTCTGCTTGTGAGGTGCTGATGTA-3′ (166 bp); and β-actin forward, 5′-CATCACTATTGGCAACGAGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GACAGCACTGTGTTGGCATA-3′ (159 bp). The number of PCR cycles for IL6, IL1β and β-actin were 25, 25 and 28, respectively. β-actin was used as an internal control. The amplified cDNA products were resolved on 1.5% agarose gels. The sizes of the amplified DNA fragments were identified by comparison with a SolGent 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (SolGent Co., Ltd.). Bands were detected using an Azure cSeries (Azure Biosystems, Inc.). Densitometry was performed using ImageJ 1.52a software (National Institutes of Health) and normalized to the untreated control group. Quantitative amplification of cDNA was conducted in a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with PowerSYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The RT-qPCR conditions were as follows: Incubation for 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 15 sec at 95°C, annealing for 15 sec at 60°C and extension for 15 sec at 72°C. Relative mRNA levels were calculated using a standard curve generated from cDNA dilutions. The 2−ΔΔCq method was used to calculate relative gene expression using quadruplicate measurements, with β-actin as an internal control (35).
Western blot analysis
Cytosolic protein extracts from RAW 264.7 cells were prepared with PhosphoSafe Protein Extraction Reagent (Novagen, Inc.), according to the manufacturers protocol. Isolation of nuclear fractions from RAW 264.7 cells was performed using a nuclear extraction kit (Cayman Chemical Company). Total protein was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at a wavelength of 562 nm, and 15 µg cytosolic protein/lane and 10 µg nuclear protein/lane were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels and transferred to Protran nitrocellulose membranes (Whatman plc; Cytiva). Membranes were blocked with 10 mM Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20 (TBST) containing 5% skimmed milk for 1 h at 25°C, followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C with gentle shaking. The antibodies used were as follows: phosphorylated (p-)IκBα kinase (IKK)α/β (cat. no. 2697; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), IKKα (cat. no. 2682; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), IKKβ (cat. no. 2678; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), p-IκBα (cat. no. 2859; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), IκBα (cat. no. 9242; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), NF-κB p65 subunit (cat. no. 8242; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), iNOS (cat. no. 13120; 1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; cat. no. sc-56; 1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). A mouse monoclonal primary antibody against β-actin (cat. no. A5441; 1:5,000; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) was used as a loading control. The blots were washed in TBST and then incubated for 2 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit (cat. no. 7074; 1:2,500; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) or anti-mouse IgG (cat. no. sc-516102; 1:2,500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). The blots were subsequently washed with TBST and protein bands were visualized with HRP Substrate Luminol Reagent (EMD Millipore) and imaged on a Chemiluminescent Western Blot Imaging System (Azure Biosystems, Inc.). Densitometry of western blot bands was performed using ImageJ 1.52a software (National Institutes of Health). The detected bands were quantified using ImageJ and normalized to the untreated control group.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v17.0 (SPSS, Inc.). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of the mean. The Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunns post hoc test was used to compare the different groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Each experiment was performed three times.
Results
Cytotoxic effects of oraCMU on RAW 264.7 macrophages
To assess the cytotoxicity of live oraCMU, its effects on the viability of RAW 264.7 macrophages were examined. No cytotoxic effects were detected after 24 h of treatment at various concentrations (Fig. 1).
Inhibitory effects of oraCMU on NO production and iNOS expression
To investigate whether oraCMU possesses anti-inflammatory effects against A. actinomycetemcomitans in RAW 264.7 macrophages, its effects on NO production were examined. After 24 h of A. actinomycetemcomitans treatment, NO release was higher compared with that in the untreated controls (Fig. 2A). Treatment with oraCMU significantly decreased A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced NO production in a dose-dependent manner. Changes in NO production can be attributed to changes in iNOS expression (30). Treatment with A. actinomycetemcomitans significantly increased iNOS expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages and oraCMU treatment significantly decreased iNOS expression in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B and C).
Inhibitory effects of oraCMU on the mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines
To determine whether oraCMU modulates the mRNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines, RAW 264.7 macrophages were incubated with A. actinomycetemcomitans and various concentrations of oraCMU. IL6 and IL1β increased significantly with A. actinomycetemcomitans treatment and were significantly decreased at higher doses of oraCMU (Fig. 3).
Inhibitory effects of oraCMU on NF-κB activation
As the NF-κB pathway plays an important role in the transcriptional activation of proinflammatory factors, the effects of oraCMU on NF-κB activation were next assessed by examining p65 levels in cytosolic and nuclear extracts from macrophages treated with A. actinomycetemcomitans and oraCMU for 30 min or 1 h. A. actinomycetemcomitans alone resulted in increased nuclear p65, whereas oraCMU treatment significantly inhibited the nuclear accumulation of p65 at high doses (Fig. 4).
Inhibitory effects of oraCMU on A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced IκBα and IKKα/β phosphorylation
As IκBα and IKKα/β are important regulators of NF-κB activation, their activation after oraCMU treatment of A. actinomycetemcomitans-stimulated macrophages were evaluated. After 30 min, OraCMU significantly inhibited IκBα phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5). In addition, after 10 min, oraCMU dose-dependently inhibited IKKα/β phosphorylation (Fig. 6).
Discussion
OraCMU is the first commercialized oral care probiotic in Korea (32) that can help prevent bad breath and dental caries (28,36,37). It inhibits the Fusobacterium nucleatum-induced increase of the proinflammatory cytokines IL6 and IL8 in oral epithelial cells (33) and has antimicrobial activity against various representative periodontal pathogens, including A. actinomycetemcomitans (38). Therefore, oraCMU may aid in preventing periodontal disease. However, its inhibitory effects on proinflammatory cytokine expression in macrophages stimulated with A. actinomycetemcomitans, a periodontal pathogen, have not yet been reported. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to elucidate the mechanism by which W. cibaria inhibits inflammatory cytokine expression after infection with periodontal pathogens.
The present study evaluated whether live oraCMU had inhibitory effects on the inflammation induced by formalin-inactivated A. actinomycetemcomitans in RAW 264.7 cells. The A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced inflammatory response was characterized by increased NO production and increased iNOS, IL1β and IL6 expression; oraCMU decreased the levels of these proinflammatory mediators. To exclude the possibility that cytotoxicity caused by live oraCMU infection was responsible for the inhibition of the proinflammatory mediators, the viability of oraCMU-infected cells was tested. No obvious cytotoxic effects were detected at any MOI used, consistent with the results of our previous study (33).
NO is an important biomarker of the inflammatory response and is regulated by iNOS (16). The iNOS enzyme cannot be detected under normal conditions but is induced through NF-κB activation, leading to excessive NO production. Excessive NO leads to the upregulation of other proinflammatory cytokines and can cause malfunctions ranging from severe cellular damage to inflammatory disorders (39). Thus, regulating iNOS expression is an important strategy in the development of inflammatory disease therapies. The present study found that oraCMU significantly decreased A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced NO production and downregulated iNOS expression in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that oraCMU acts as an anti-inflammatory regulator.
Madeira et al (40), found that A. actinomycetemcomitans LPS plays an important role in alveolar bone loss. They also demonstrated that it can induce NO production in murine macrophages. The present study used inactivated A. actinomycetemcomitans as a trigger instead of its LPS and found that live oraCMU decreased A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 cells by inhibiting iNOS at the mRNA level. Similarly, Yu et al (31), reported that treatment with heat-inactivated W. cibaria JW15 decreased NO production in RAW 264.7 cells upon LPS stimulation, which was attributable to downregulated iNOS expression.
NF-κB regulates the expression of iNOS and other proinflammatory factors (16,17). In the present study, A. actinomycetemcomitans stimulation increased p65 levels in the nucleus; this was inhibited by high doses of oraCMU, suggesting that it can inactivate NF-κB. In addition, it inhibited IκBα and IKKα/β phosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggested that oraCMU blocks the expression of proinflammatory mediators by inhibiting the classical NF-κB pathway.
The proinflammatory cytokines IL1β and IL6 are representative diagnostic markers that provide information about the progression of periodontal disease (17). Their expression is higher at sites of periodontal inflammation and is closely associated with the clinical severity of periodontitis. IL6 secretion, stimulated by exposure to IL1β, is involved in the periodontal tissue destruction that occurs in periodontitis (17). In the present study, live oraCMU displayed dose-dependent anti-inflammatory activities in macrophages activated by A. actinomycetemcomitans by inhibiting NF-κB signaling (Fig. 7). Heat-inactivated W. cibaria JW15 has also been shown to suppress IL1β and IL6 expression; moreover, mechanistically, its anti-inflammatory properties are mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and result in NF-κB inhibition (31).
Probiotics are viable microorganisms that have a number of health benefits, which includes regulating intestinal microbial balance and exerting immune-modulating effects on the host through colonization of the intestinal microflora (25). Since the composition of bacterial surface molecules, including amino acid residues, disaccharide ratio and differences in cross-link type, are different between microbes, microbe-mediated immune responses are probiotic strain-specific (23–25). The present study simultaneously inoculated macrophages with formalin-inactivated A. actinomycetemcomitans and live bacteria oraCMU, and then confirmed the mechanism of action of A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced inflammatory cytokine expression via cell signaling. Probiotics and periodontal pathogens were evaluated by direct contact with macrophages.
Metabolites and altered surroundings produced by probiotics can affect the inhibition of inflammatory cytokine expression in macrophages, but do not exert inhibitory effects due to the use of inactivated A. actinomycetemcomitans. Since oraCMU is commercially used as a living bacterium, the live bacterium oraCMU was used in this study. As oraCMU is an anaerobic bacterium, it was expected to be effective because it can grow well under anaerobic conditions when it enters the periodontal pocket.
Previous studies on W. cibaria strain derived from Kimchi, a fermented food, have focused on intestinal immunity (30,31). However, previous studies have reported that probiotics work in the oral cavity and have beneficial effects (24–28). The present study is novel in that the W. cibaria strain, derived from the saliva of children with healthy mouths, was investigated for the prevention of proinflammatory responses by A. actinomycetemcomitans and for its cellular signaling mechanism.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated the anti-inflammatory effects of the oral cavity-derived probiotic oraCMU, indicating its usefulness as a prophylactic oral probiotic. OraCMU inhibited proinflammatory signaling in A. actinomycetemcomitans-induced macrophages by blocking NF-κB activation, resulting in decreased phosphorylation of IKKs and IκBα, decreased translocation of p65 to the nucleus and decreased expression of iNOS, IL1β and IL6. Although further in vivo research will be required to confirm the anti-inflammatory effects of this strain, these results provide molecular evidence for the immunomodulatory effects of oraCMU. Overall, the findings of present study indicated that oraCMU could be used to develop oral care probiotics that can aid in the prevention of periodontal disease. The effects of live probiotics were investigated in the present study. Comparative studies on live and dead oraCMU in a further study might be meaningful and should be considered in further research.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The present study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant no. 2017R1D1A1B03030952).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors contributions
MJK and JYK performed most of the experiments. YOY and HJK analyzed the data. HJK and MSK designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the research and ensure that the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
MSK is employed by OraPharm Inc. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Wojdasiewicz P, Poniatowski ŁA and Szukiewicz D: The role of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2014:5614592014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG and Papapanou PN: Periodontal diseases. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 3:170382017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cochran DL: Inflammation and bone loss in periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 79 (Suppl):1569–1576. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Silva N, Abusleme L, Bravo D, Dutzan N, Garcia-Sesnich J, Vernal R, Hernández M and Gamonal J: Host response mechanisms in periodontal diseases. J Appl Oral Sci. 23:329–355. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sánchez GA, Acquier AB, De Couto A, Busch L and Mendez CF: Association between Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque and clinical parameters, in Argentine patients with aggressive periodontitis. Microb Pathog. 82:31–36. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Graves D: Cytokines that promote periodontal tissue destruction. J Periodontol. 79 (Suppl):1585–1591. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gholizadeh P, Pormohammad A, Eslami H, Shokouhi B, Fakhrzadeh V and Kafil HS: Oral pathogenesis of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Microb Pathog. 113:303–311. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng Z, Meade J, Mankia K, Emery P and Devine DA: Periodontal disease and periodontal bacteria as triggers for rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 31:19–30. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brage M, Holmlund A and Johansson A: Humoral immune response to Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans leukotoxin. J Periodontal Res. 46:170–175. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh S, Bhatia R, Singh A, Singh P, Kaur R, Khare P, Purama RK, Boparai RK, Rishi P, Ambalam P, et al: Probiotic attributes and prevention of LPS-induced pro-inflammatory stress in RAW264.7 macrophages and human intestinal epithelial cell line (Caco-2) by newly isolated Weissella cibaria strains. Food Funct. 9:1254–1264. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Weidenmaier C, Kristian SA and Peschel A: Bacterial resistance to antimicrobial host defenses--an emerging target for novel antiinfective strategies? Curr Drug Targets. 4:643–649. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nau GJ, Richmond JF, Schlesinger A, Jennings EG, Lander ES and Young RA: Human macrophage activation programs induced by bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:1503–1508. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Turner MD, Nedjai B, Hurst T and Pennington DJ: Cytokines and chemokines: At the crossroads of cell signalling and inflammatory disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1843:2563–2582. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Choi EY, Jin JY, Lee JY, Choi JI, Choi IS and Kim SJ: Anti-inflammatory effects and the underlying mechanisms of action of daidzein in murine macrophages stimulated with Prevotella intermedia lipopolysaccharide. J Periodontal Res. 47:204–211. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D and Sun SC: NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23. | |
Aktan F: iNOS-mediated nitric oxide production and its regulation. Life Sci. 75:639–653. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen CC, Chang KL, Huang JF, Huang JS and Tsai CC: Correlation of interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, and periodontitis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 13:609–617. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Carrizales-Sepúlveda EF, Ordaz-Farías A, Vera-Pineda R and Flores-Ramírez R: Periodontal disease, systemic inflammation and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Heart Lung Circ. 27:1327–1334. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Parihar AS, Katoch V, Rajguru SA, Rajpoot N, Singh P and Wakhle S: Periodontal disease: A possible risk-factor for adverse pregnancy outcome. J Int Oral Health. 7:137–142. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ganesh P, Karthikeyan R, Muthukumaraswamy A and Anand J: A potential role of periodontal inflammation in Alzheimers disease: A Review. Oral Health Prev Dent. 15:7–12. 2017.PubMed/NCBI | |
Da Rocha HA, Silva CF, Santiago FL, Martins LG, Dias PC and De Magalhães D: Local drug delivery systems in the treatment of periodontitis: A literature review. J Int Acad Periodontol. 17:82–90. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA and Phillips EJ: Antibiotic allergy. Lancet. 393:183–198. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gupta G: Probiotics and periodontal health. J Med Life. 4:387–394. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Saha S, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Tabrizian M and Prakash S: Probiotics as oral health biotherapeutics. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 12:1207–1220. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reid G, Jass J, Sebulsky MT and McCormick JK: Potential uses of probiotics in clinical practice. Clin Microbiol Rev. 16:658–672. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burton JP, Drummond BK, Chilcott CN, Tagg JR, Thomson WM, Hale JDF and Wescombe PA: Influence of the probiotic Streptococcus salivarius strain M18 on indices of dental health in children: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Med Microbiol. 62:875–884. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Szkaradkiewicz AK, Stopa J and Karpiński TM: Effect of oral administration involving a probiotic strain of Lactobacillus reuteri on pro-inflammatory cytokine response in patients with chronic periodontitis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 62:495–500. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang MS, Kim BG, Chung J, Lee HC and Oh JS: Inhibitory effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the production of volatile sulphur compounds. J Clin Periodontol. 33:226–232. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Björkroth KJ, Schillinger U, Geisen R, Weiss N, Hoste B, Holzapfel WH, Korkeala HJ and Vandamme P: Taxonomic study of Weissella confusa and description of Weissella cibaria sp. nov., detected in food and clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 52:141–148. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park HE, Kang KW, Kim BS, Lee SM and Lee WK: Immunomodulatory potential of Weissella cibaria in aged C57BL/6J mice. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 27:2094–2103. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yu HS, Lee NK, Choi AJ, Choe JS, Bae CH and Paik HD: Anti-inflammatory potential of probiotic strain Weissella cibaria JW15 isolated from Kimchi through regulation of NF-κB and MAPKs pathways in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 29:1022–1032. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang HJ, Kang MS, Yi SH, Hong JY and Hong SP: Comparative study on the characteristics of Weissella cibaria CMU and probiotic strains for oral care. Molecules. 21:212016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kang MS, Lim HS, Kim SM, Lee HC and Oh JS: Effect of Weissella cibaria on Fusobacterium nucleatum-induced interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 production in KB cells. J Bacteriol Virol. 41:9–18. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim JW, Jung BH, Lee JH, Yoo KY, Lee H, Kang MS and Lee JK: Effect of Weissella cibaria on the reduction of periodontal tissue destruction in mice. J Periodontol. doi:10.1002/JPER.19-0288. | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−ΔΔC(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang MS, Chung J, Kim SM, Yang KH and Oh JS: Effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Caries Res. 40:418–425. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park HR, Kim HJ and Kang MS: Clinical studies on the dental caries prevention effects of the ability of Weissella cibaria CMU to adhere to the oral cavity. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 9:1163–1169. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Asok A, Bhandary R, Shetty M and Shenoy MS: Probiotics and periodontal disease. Int J Oral Health Sci. 8:68–72. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baron VT, Pio R, Jia Z and Mercola D: Early growth response 3 regulates genes of inflammation and directly activates IL6 and IL8 expression in prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 112:755–764. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Madeira MF, Queiroz-Junior CM, Cisalpino D, Werneck SM, Kikuchi H, Fujise O, Ryffel B, Silva TA, Teixeira MM and Souza DG: MyD88 is essential for alveolar bone loss induced by Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans lipopolysaccharide in mice. Mol Oral Microbiol. 28:415–424. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |