3D‑printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds combined with pulse electromagnetic fields enhance osseointegration in osteoporosis
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 29, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2021.12049
- Article Number: 410
-
Copyright: © Ye et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Osteoporosis is a systemic osteopathy defined by insufficiency in bone repair due to the impairment of bone microstructure, the decrease of bone quality and density and the increase of bone fragility (1,2). Moreover, the osteoporotic microenvironment is not conducive to the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), causing excessive bone loss and decreased osteogenic capacity (3,4). These factors lead to inadequate osseointegration within the bone and implant surfaces, thus causing an increased risk of complications in patients after joint replacement and dental implantation, due to implant loosening and displacement (5–7). Therefore, improving the osseointegration efficiency of implants would be of high clinical benefit to solve these problems.
Titanium (Ti) alloy is a widely applied material for orthopedic or dental implants with promising application prospects due to its predominant mechanical strength and corrosion resistance; however, it is restricted by its high stiffness which consequently results in stress-shielding-induced osteolysis (8,9). Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology is a promising method for the generation of individualized implants with complex components and porous sections in a single process (10,11). Interconnected porous implants with controlled pore size and porosity can significantly decrease the stiffness, imitate the structure of natural bone tissue superiorly and promote bone regeneration. Moreover, bone ingrowth into the micropores of 3D-printed porous Ti (pTi) alloy could enhance the osseointegration and improve the stability of the implants (12–14). However, considering the biological inertia, smooth surface and poor cellular adhesion of Ti alloys, pTi scaffolds may fail due to insufficient osteointegration with the surrounding bone, especially under pathological states, such as osteoporosis (15,16). Therefore, improving the bioactivity of osteoblast-related cells on the surface of titanium alloy is anticipated to treat the postoperative complications of osteoporosis patients. Bai et al (17) constructed a pTi/poloxamer 407 hydrogel system loaded with zoledronate, a bisphosphonate, thus obtaining an optimized osseointegration effect in osteoporotic defect models. In addition, Vladescu et al (10) coated 3D-printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds with HA, and calcium phosphate nanoparticles to improve the bioactivity and biocompatibility of the scaffolds. However, as it is difficult to release the loaded drugs continuously and maintain the stability of bio-coating, implanting pTi scaffolds into bone defects followed by extracorporeal non-invasive and repetitive therapy may be a potential strategy to promote bone integration (18,19).
Pulse electromagnetic fields (PEMF), which are transient electromagnetic fields produced in a coil when a pulse current generated by a pulse generator passes through the coil, are considered as a non-invasive treatment with the effect of promoting bone regeneration in clinical applications (20). In terms of cytology, external PEMF have could promote the early and late osteogenesis, enhance mineralization of BMSCs (21), improve cell viability and enhance alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of osteoblasts (22), as well as inhibit bone resorption by inhibiting the formation and maturation of osteoclasts (23). Although previous studies have indicated that PEMF therapy has beneficial effects on bone regeneration and significantly enhances the healing of fracture, non-union and other orthopedic diseases, it has not been widely used to enhance osteointegration for osteoporotic bone defects (24,25).
In the present study, it was hypothesized that the combination therapy of 3D-printed pTi and PEMF may have a positive effect on bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo in osteoporotic bone defects. The pTi implant supports optimized pore size and porosity, which match the mechanical properties of the bone tissue to decrease stress shielding. Additionally, a previous study has demonstrated that PEMF therapy (50 Hz; 1 mT) could induce osteogenic differentiation and proliferation of MSCs (26). In the present study, PEMF were used at the same frequency and intensity to detect whether PEMF therapy affect the fate of osteoporosis-derived BMSCs (OP-BMSCs) and enhance osseointegration in osteoporotic rabbits (Fig. 1). To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the combination of 3D-printed pTi and PEMF to promote osseointegration in osteoporosis to reduce complications following implantation.
Materials and methods
Materials
Ti6Al4V powder was purchased from AK Medical Co., Ltd. Low glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (LG-DMEM), streptomycin-penicillin and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; cat. no. C0039) and Calcein acetoxymethyl ester (Calcein-AM)/Propidium Iodide (PI; cat. no. C2015M) were purchased from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology. Rhodamine-phalloidin and DAPI were supplied by Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The media for alizarin red staining (ARS) and osteogenic differentiation of rabbit BMSCs (cat. no. RBXMX-90021) were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences. The 4% paraformaldehyde solution and PBS were obtained from Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology. Eastep Super Total RNA Extraction Kit was supplied by Promega Corporation. Perfect Real Time RT reagent kit, Prime Script RT reagent kit, and SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit were provided by Takara Biotechnology. TRIzol® reagent was supplied by Invitrogen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Masson stains were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. The estrogen ELISA kit (cat. no. ML-Elisa-1434) was obtained from R&D Systems.
Preparation of pTi implants
Ti6Al4V porous scaffolds conducted by 3D printing were prepared by using additive manufacturing with an electron beam melting system (Q10, Arcam AB), as previously reported (27,28). Briefly, pTi alloy implants (porosity, 70%; pore size, 600 µm) with a pre-designed 3D template were translated to a standard triangulation language (STL) file, which was loaded into the EBM system. Spherical Ti alloy powder was melted layer by layer according to the preset parameters (porosity, 70%; pore size, 600 µm), then solidified by cooling. Disk-shaped (φ10 mm × L3 mm) pTi implants for microstructure identification in vitro experiments, and columnar-shaped (φ6 mm × L10 mm) pTi implants for osseointegration study in vivo. All prepared pTi implants were ultrasonically cleaned and sequentially cleaned in acetone, ethyl alcohol and deionized water for ~15 min for each treatment.
Characterization of pTi implants
To verify whether the prepared implants match with the pre-designed parameters, the porosity of samples was detected by micro-computed tomography (CT) (SkyScan 1076 scanner, Bruker micro-CT NV) and analyzed using NRecon software (version 1.6.6; Bruker micro-CT). To calculate the average pore size and distribution, the microstructure of pTi scaffolds was obtained using a JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope (SEM; JEOL, Ltd.), and images were quantitatively analyzed using ImageJ 1.50i (National Institutes of Health).
Establishment of osteoporosis models
The osteoporotic rabbit model was generated by bilateral OVX. Five-month-old female New Zealand White rabbits (n=30; 2.5 kg) were randomly separated into two groups, the OVX group (n=27) and the sham group (n=3). Surgical operations were conducted under general anesthesia using 3% (w/v) pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) intravenously. The median incision of the lower abdomen was chosen for surgery after skin shaving and sterilizing. The rabbits in the OVX group underwent bilateral OVX surgery, whereas those in the sham group were pseudo-operated, closing to the abdominal cavity after leaving the ovaries in situ. All rabbits were maintained in a cage individually and fed with standard chow (15–25°C, humidity 60–70%, 12-h light/dark cycle, fed twice a day, and drank ad libitum). Penicillin (1.5 mg/kg) was administered to post-operative rabbits by intramuscular injection for three consecutive days to prevent infection.
Ten months after surgery, the concentration of serum estrogen was measured using an ELISA kit. Furthermore, three animals from each group were sacrificed by intravenous injection of air under anesthesia by 3% (w/v) pentobarbital (150 mg/kg) intravenously, and distal femurs were harvested for micro-CT assessment to confirm the establishment of osteoporosis.
Scaffold implantation and PEMF treatment
At 10 months post-OVX, osteoporotic rabbits were used in vivo osseointegration experiments. After general anesthesia using 3% (w/v) pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and preparation for operation, a longitudinal incision was performed in the distal femur of the left hind limb. After exposing the bony surface of the lateral condyle, cylindrical bone defects with a diameter of 6 mm and a depth of 10 mm were prepared with a bone drill. The defects were transplanted with pTi implants, then the incisions were closed by absorbable sutures. Postoperative management was carried out as aforementioned.
On the fourth day after the implantation, the 24 osteoporotic rabbits were randomly divided into two groups: i) pT1 group, which received pTi implants without PEMF; and ii) pTi + PMEFs group, which received pTi implants with PEMF therapy. The rabbits of the pTi + PEMF group were kept in a plastic fixer, with their left legs placed within the scope of the coils of the PEMF machine in order to expose them to the pulse electromagnetic waves. The treatment parameters of PEMF were 50 Hz, 1 mT, 2 h per day. After 6 and 12 weeks of treatment, rabbits were sacrificed by intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium 100 mg/kg, and femur samples were collected and fixed in 4% polyformaldehyde solution for further Micro-CT analysis and histological evaluation.
Isolation and culture of OP-BMSCs
OP-BMSCs were extracted from female rabbits (n=3) 10 months after bilateral ovariotomy (OVX) and cultured as previously reported (27). Briefly, BMSCs derived from the OVX rabbits were harvested from the marrow cavity of long bone of extremities after centrifugation (996 × g, 20 min, 20°C) and cultured in LG-DMEM medium containing 10% FBS (v/v) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin in a humidified environment with 37°C and 5% CO2. Once OP-BMSCs grew to ~80% confluence, the adherent cells were treated with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin/EDTA at 37°C for 3 min. The cell suspension was collected and centrifuged (377 × g, 5 min, 20°C), then the obtained cell precipitates were resuspended and passaged. The third generation of OP-BMSCs was used in subsequent in vitro experiments.
In vitro cell experiments. To evaluate on cell attachment, proliferation, survival rate, morphology, and osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs, CCK-8 assays, Calcein-AM/PI and rhodamine phalloidin staining, and reverse transcription quantitative-PCR (RT-qPCR) were carried out. Briefly, the pTi implants were immersed into a 24-well plate with DMEM, and OP-BMSCs (2×105 cells/well) were added into each sample. The experiments consisted of two groups: i) pTi group, OP-BMSCs seeded on pTi implants under the basal culture medium without PEMF; and ii) pTi + PEMF group, OP-BMSCs seeded on the pTi implants with PEMF therapy. The PEMF device (Prima PFM61009; Shanghai Prima Electronics Co., Ltd.) consisted of a generator and its connected coils. The OP-BMSCs in the pTi + PEMF group were placed on the center of the coils in an incubator and received PEMF stimulation during culture (50 Hz; 1 mT; 2 h per day). The medium was changed every 3 days.
Evaluation of cell viability
After incubating for 24 h, the DMEM medium was discarded, and the CCK-8 solution was then added into each well and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The number of OP-BMSCs adhering to the surface of implants was quantitatively detected by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan EX; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). To evaluate the cell proliferation, CCK-8 assays were conducted after 1, 4 and 7 days of OP-BMSC culture on implants with or without PEMF. Live/Dead staining of the OP-BMSCs was detected at day 3 using a Calcein-AM/PI Double Stain kit according to the manufacturer's protocol, and observed under a FV1000 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) (Olympus Corporation). For morphological evaluation at day 3, the samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, then permeabilized by 0.1% Triton X-100 for 5 min at room temperature, and washed with PBS repeatedly for 3 times. Finally, the samples were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin for 30 min and DAPI for 5 min at room temperature in dark according to the manufacturer's instructions. The photomicrographs of stained cells were collected under a CLSM.
Evaluation osteogenic differentiation in vitro
To detect the osteogenic ability of OP-BMSCs in the presence of PEMF, basal culture medium was replaced by osteogenic induction medium including LG-DMEM along with β-glycerol-phosphate (10 mM), ascorbate-2-phosphate (50 µM), and dexamethasone (0.1 µM). The protocols of cell culture and PEMF treatment were the same as the cell viability investigation in the previous section. Following osteogenic culture for 14 or 21 days, ARS (15 min, room temperature) was conducted to assess calcium deposition according to the manufacturer's protocols and observed by a stereoscopic microscope (ZOOM-750; Tuming Optical Instrument Co., Ltd.). Subsequently, 10% cetylpyridinium chloride was added into the dyed mineralized nodules to dissolve the stained calcium nodules for further semi-quantitative analysis. The obtained solution was detected at 450 nm through a microplate reader to assess unobservable calcium nodules inside the micropores.
Moreover, after treating with osteogenic induction medium for 14 and 21 days, the expression levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt-related transcription factor-2 (Runx-2), osteocalcin (OCN), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in OP-BMSCs in the different groups were measured using RT-qPCR. The sequences of primers were listed in Table I. Briefly, total RNA was extracted with TRIzol® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1 µg total RNA per sample was reversely transcribed to cDNA using a Prime Script RT reagent kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. The expressions of target genes were quantified by RT-qPCR using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. The qPCR was conducted using 2X Fast SYBR-Green Master Mix. Amplification was performed in 96-well optical reaction plates (Roche Diagnostics) on LightCycler 480 (Roche Diagnostics) using the following program: 94°C for 1 min to activate polymerase, 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 20 sec and 72°C for 20 sec; melting curve analysis was performed after every run by heating up to 95°C to monitor presence of unspecific products. The relative mRNA expression levels were normalized to that of GAPDH and calculated using the 2−ΔΔCq method (29).
Micro-CT analysis
To explore the efficiency of bone formation, the samples were screened by micro-CT (voltage, 90 kV voltage; current intensity, 114 mA; pixel size, 18 µm). The cylindrical region of the pTi was targeted as the region of interest (ROI; a cylinder with diameter of 6 mm and height of 10 mm) for 3D reconstruction and further parameter analysis. Quantitative morphometric analysis, including bone volume/tissue volume ratio (BV/TV, %), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, mm), was conducted using micro-CT auxiliary software (NRecon version 1.6.6).
Histological evaluation
The femur specimens containing pTi implants were embedded in methyl methacrylate, without undergoing decalcification and sectioned into thin sections (150–300 µm thickness). The sections were ground down and polished to 40–50 µm through the transverse saw cuts and polishing machine (EXAKT Apparatebau GmbH & Co. KG). After polishing, these hard tissue sections were stained with Masson stain for 150 min at room temperature to evaluate the bone regeneration and osseointegration with the porous implants.
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two independent groups were compared using unpaired Student's t-test, while >2 groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All experiments were performed independently at least three times and the detailed times are shown in the figure legends.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of pTi implants
pTi implants were successfully manufactured by EBM technology. Representative optical images of the pTi implants are presented in Fig. 2A. The micro-CT quantitative analysis revealed the porosity of the pTi was 70.08±0.55%. The pore size detected based on the SEM pictures was mainly distributed at 580–620 µm (Fig. 2B). The average pore size was 600.11±7.21 µm (Fig. 2C). Therefore, the actual porosity and pore size were in accordance with the pre-designed parameters (600 µm and 70%, respectively).
The osseointegrative capacity of implants is usually determined by the osteoconductivity of the prosthesis, which is further bound up with the porosity, pore size and distribution of the scaffolds. The porosity of porous implants for bone tissue engineering, is expected to be >50%, especially within the scope of 65–75%, which is mechanically and structurally similar to human trabecular bone. Additionally, a 300–700 µm pore size is beneficial for osteoblast adhesion, differentiation and proliferation (30). Thus, the porosity and pore size of pTi implants generated in this study were optimal for bone tissue engineering. It has been reported that the increased surface area and porosity of the implants can enhance the initial stability, bone ingrowth ability and the friction coefficient between the bone and scaffolds, thus decreasing micromotion and accelerating osseointegration after implanting in vivo (31). Furthermore, interconnected internal structure of the pTi scaffolds were favorable to oxygen and nutrient exchange, therefore improving cell growth and communication and further enhancing bone regeneration (32).
Cell attachment, proliferation, survival and morphology
Under normal conditions, the bone is continuously renewed through a coordinated progress involving complex stem cell behaviors, including adhesion, proliferation, differentiation, maturation and mineralization (33). By contrast, under the condition of osteoporosis, BMSCs present decreased ability of proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation leading to limited capacity of bone regeneration (34). External PEMF have been shown to promote cell proliferation, osteogenesis and mineralization (21,22). Therefore, it was hypothesized that PEMF could be applied as a potential target to treat osteoporosis by modulating BMSC behavior. To test this hypothesis, the OP-BMSCs harvested from the OVX rabbits were added onto the pTi and received PEMF therapy.
The osseointegration between the implants and bone tissue starts from osteogenesis-related cells adhering to the surface of the prosthesis (28). As shown in Fig. 3A, the absorbance, which stood for the number of OP-BMSCs, was significantly increased in the pTi + PEMF group compared with that in the pTi group. Moreover, cell proliferation in the different groups was evaluated using a CCK-8 assay. In the OP-BMSCs from the pTi + PEMF group, cell proliferation was significantly increased compared with that in the pTi group on day 4, and this difference was more distinct on day 7 (Fig. 3B). OP-BMSCs seeded on the implants treated with or without PEMF were stained with Calcein AM/PI to measure cell viability. The fluorescent images demonstrated that the OP-BMSCs possessed good cell viability in the pTi and pTi + PEMF groups on day 3 (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the viability rate of OP-BMSCs was also quantified. The results showed that the viability rates in the pTi and pTi + PEMF groups were 89.52±1.64, 92.34±2.00%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (Fig. 3D). These results suggested that the pTi have good biocompatibility, and that external PEMF could promote cell attachment and proliferation, as well as and maintain viability of OP-BMSCs.
Because the morphology of the cells on the implants could dramatically influence cellular behavior, the cytoskeletal distribution of cells attached on the hydrogel was then analyzed (35). OP-BMSCs were double-stained with rhodamine-phalloidin (indicating the F-actin filament) and DAPI (indicating the nucleus) for observation. As demonstrated in Fig. 3E, the F-actin filament morphology of OP-BMSCs on the pTi implants with PEMF therapy showed better spreading and displayed more lamellipodia extensions than those on pTi scaffolds without PEMF therapy, indicating that the external PEMF could induce cell maturation (36). The intensity of F-actin on the OP-BMSCs was further quantitatively analyzed in the immunofluorescent images. As shown in Fig. 3F, OP-BMSCs in pTi + PEMF group showed increased F-actin fluorescence (1.38-fold) compared to that in the pTi group. It is well-recognized that the F-actin filament plays a fundamental role in the early maturation of BMSCs, and helps improve bone cell function by modulating cell proliferation and differentiation (36,37). Therefore, PEMF therapy can significantly enhance the expression of F-actin filaments and improve cytoskeletal organization, which is beneficial for the early osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.
Osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs
In addition to cell attachment, proliferation, survival and morphology of OP-BMSCs and osteogenic differentiation are critical factors for the initiation of bone regeneration (28). In order to explore the effect of external PEMF on cell osteogenic differentiation on the pTi implants, ARS was used to assess mineralized matrix synthesis. ARS is a histological staining method for mineralization, which indicates calcium deposition. As demonstrated in Fig. 4A, calcium deposits in the pTi group were limited at day 14. However, in the pTi + PEMF group, visible calcified nodules were detected, which were more prominent on day 21. Furthermore, the semi-quantitative analysis confirmed that the cells in pTi + PEMF group exhibited increased calcium deposition compared with the pTi group at 14 and 21 days (Fig. 4B). Therefore, these results indicated that PEMF could promote the formation of mineralized matrix and further enhance the efficiency of mineralization.
In order to verify the effect of external PEMF on osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs on the pTi implants at the mRNA level, multiple osteogenic differentiation markers, such as ALP, Runx-2, OCN and BMP-2, were detected using RT-qPCR. In general, ALP is marker for osteogenic differentiation, and the stimulation of ALP activity is a critical event in early osteogenesis (38). The results indicated the mRNA level of ALP was significantly increased in the pTi + PEMF group after treatment for either 14 days or 21 days, compared with that of the pTi group (Fig. 4C). Runx-2 is a indicative of early osteoblastic differentiation and can induce the expression of key osteogenic genes, such as OCN and osteopontin (39). Compared with the pTi group, the expression of Runx-2 in the pTi + PEMF group was upregulated 1.39-fold and 1.31-fold on day 14 and 21, respectively (Fig. 4D). BMP-2 is an essential osteoinductive factors and recognized to induce the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts (40). Compared with pTi group, the transcriptional level of BMP-2 was upregulated significantly at day 14 and 21 in the presence of external PEMF (Fig. 4E). OCN is a bone-specific protein synthesized by osteoblasts that can enhance osteogenic maturation and bone formation; it is expressed most abundantly at the late stage of osteogenesis (41). The expression level of OCN was measured in order to evaluate the osteogenic maturation of OP-BMSCs. The expression of OCN in pTi + PEMF group did not differ significantly at day 14, but was significantly upregulated at day 21, compared with the pTi group (Fig. 4F).
Based on the detection of ARS and quantification of osteogenic-related gene expression, it may be hypothesized that external PEMF could enhance the osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs on the pTi implants. However, the mechanism through which PEMF can promote osteogenic differentiation remains unclear. For the osteogenic induction of BMSCs by PEMF, previous studies have obtained partial mechanism level explanation. Bagheri et al (42) confirmed that PEMF activated the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through the Notch pathway. Zhou et al (43) suggested that PEMF induced the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. In addition, Selvamurugan et al (44) showed that PEMF induced the TGF-β signaling pathway and increased the expression of microRNA-21-5p in the bone metabolism of BMSCs. Similarly, beneficial osteogenic induction effects were also observed in the present study in OP-BMSCs treated with external PEMF.
Establishment of osteoporosis model
In osteoporosis, the imbalance between bone formation and bone resorption leads to reduced bone mineral density (BMD), which improves risk of fracture and obstructed the ability of bone regeneration (1,2). It has previously been reported that estrogen deficiency can result in increased bone resorption, thus impairing osteoblast function (45). The serum levels of estrogen was significantly inhibited in the OVX group compared with those of the sham group (Fig. 5A). Moreover, Micro-CT 2D slides showed the trabecular bone structure became looser and thinner in the OVX group (Fig. 5B). The statistical analysis suggested that the BMD (Fig. 5C) and BV/TV (Fig. 5D) in the OVX rabbits were significantly decreased compared with those in the sham group. Thus, these results indicated that the osteoporosis model was successfully established 10 months after bilateral OVX.
Evaluation of bone regeneration and osseointegration in vivo
Osteogenic-associated growth factors, such as BMP-2, are downregulated in the osteoporotic microenvironment (3). Furthermore, BMSCs derived from osteoporosis are few in number and deficient in osteogenic activity (4). The microenvironment with low osteogenic activity, and the imbalance between bone formation and resorption in osteoporosis state increase the risk of implants loosening and displacement after implantation. Developing novel combination therapy that promotes the osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs and enhances osseointegration to decrease implant loosening and displacement remains a challenge. In order to evaluate bone regeneration and osseointegration induced by PEMF, an in vivo study was performed in OVX rabbits.
New bone regeneration in the osteoporotic bone defects was scanned using micro-CT. Reconstruction of the porous implants and surrounding bone tissues are shown in Fig. 6A. The reconstructed spatial distribution of the new bone formation revealed that with an implantation time of 6–12 weeks, bone formation on the surface of the pTi in the pTi + PEMF group were increased significantly compared with the pTi group. To quantify the bone ingrowth, the ROI scanning of the implanted region and empty defect area was carried out. The BV/TV values of pTi and pTi + PEMF groups were 10.35±1.88 and 14.36±1.18% at 6 weeks, and 15.02±1.20 and 20.37±1.39% at 12 weeks (Fig. 6B), respectively, consistent with the 3D reconstruction results. In parallel, pTi + PEMF group was indicated with a higher Tb.Th and Tb.N value (Fig. 6C and D) and lower Tb.Sp value (Fig. 6E) compared to that in the pTi group at 6 and 12 weeks. In general, the results of micro-CT scanning indicated that PEMF could significantly enhance bone ingrowth into the pTi implants in osteoporotic bone defects.
Good osseointegration between host bone tissues and implants involved a series of complex biological processes, including the migration and differentiation of BMSCs. The optimal prosthesis is expected to conform to the surrounding bone tissue to avoid complications including loosening and displacement after implantation, as well as recover the function of bone. In the present study, hard tissue sections were stained with Masson's stain to evaluate bone osseointegration at the bone-implant interface. As shown in Fig. 7A, improved bone regeneration was observed between the newly formed bone and pTi implants without gaps in the pTi + PEMF group, while regenerated bone almost completely surrounded the surface of the implants along with a part of bone tissue filling the inner pores, especially after 12 weeks of PEMF treatment. Furthermore, there was a certain amount of new bone tissue around implants of the pTi group, but not as evident as that seen in the pTi + PEMF group. To calculate the ratio of bone area/total area (BA/TA), the histological pictures were analyzed using ImageJ. As shown in Fig. 7B, the BA/TA of pTi + PEMF group was significantly higher than pTi group at 6 weeks and 12 weeks, respectively.
PEMF are considered as a clinical physiotherapy that can enhancing bone regeneration (46). In the present study, pTi scaffolds were implanted into bone defects, and the addition of external PEMF led to a positive result on bone regeneration in osteoporosis models. This novel combination therapy of 3D-printed pTi and PEMF exhibited potential to promote bone regeneration and osseointegration of dental implants or artificial prostheses for patients with osteoporosis. To summarize, 3D-printed pTi implants could be customized according to desired parameters. External PEMF can effectively promote the viability and osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMSCs on the pTi surface and have great prospects for applications in bone tissue engineering. The combination of pTi and PEMF therapy resulted in improved repair effects on osteoporotic bone defects. These findings provided insight into the treatment of osseointegration under osteoporosis state.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by the Cultivation Program from the Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University for National Natural Science Foundation (grant no. 2018GZRPYQN06).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
MY and WL designed the study, wrote the protocol, collected the data, performed statistical analyses and contributed to writing the manuscript. LY performed the technical work. SC helped with data collection, study design and coordinated the study. XL participated in the study design and helped to critically revise the manuscript. SQ performed study design, analysis and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript and supervised the study. MY and SQ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal procedures were examined and approved by The Animal Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University (approval no. SHJT-MRJ-2020-076).
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Lau RY and Guo X: A review on current osteoporosis research: With special focus on disuse bone loss. J Osteoporos. 2011:2938082011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aghebati-Maleki L, Dolati S, Zandi R, Fotouhi A, Ahmadi M, Aghebati A, Nouri M, Kazem Shakouri S and Yousefi M: Prospect of mesenchymal stem cells in therapy of osteoporosis: A review. J Cell Physiol. 234:8570–8578. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boyce BF, Rosenberg E, de Papp AE and Duong LT: The osteoclast, bone remodelling and treatment of metabolic bone disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 42:1332–1341. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu W, Wang T, Yang C, Darvell BW, Wu J, Lin K, Chang J, Pan H and Lu WW: Alkaline biodegradable implants for osteoporotic bone defects-importance of microenvironment pH. Osteoporos Int. 27:93–104. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brandi ML: Healing of the bone with anti-fracture drugs. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 14:1441–1447. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Russell LA: Osteoporosis and orthopedic surgery: Effect of bone health on total joint arthroplasty outcome. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 15:3712013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bottai V, Dell'Osso G, Celli F, Bugelli G, Cazzella N, Cei E, Guido G and Giannotti S: Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis: The role of bone metabolism and its complications. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 12:247–250. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mei S, Wang H, Wang W, Tong L, Pan H, Ruan C, Ma Q, Liu M, Yang H, Zhang L, et al: Antibacterial effects and biocompatibility of titanium surfaces with graded silver incorporation in titania nanotubes. Biomaterials. 35:4255–4265. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang L, Le Coz-Botrel R, Beddoes C, Sjöström T and Su B: Gelatin freeze casting of biomimetic titanium alloy with anisotropic and gradient pore structure. Biomed Mater. 12:0150142017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vladescu A, Vranceanu DM, Kulesza S, Ivanov AN, Bramowicz M, Fedonnikov AS, Braic M, Norkin IA, Koptyug A, Kurtukova MO, et al: Influence of the electrolyte's pH on the properties of electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite coating on additively manufactured Ti64 alloy. Sci Rep. 7:168192017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chudinova EA, Surmeneva MA, Timin AS, Karpov TE, Wittmar A, Ulbricht M, Ivanova A, Loza K, Prymak O, Koptyug A, et al: Adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy scaffolds modified with calcium phosphate nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 176:130–139. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Amin Yavari S, van der Stok J, Chai YC, Wauthle R, Tahmasebi Birgani Z, Habibovic P, Mulier M, Schrooten J, Weinans H and Zadpoor AA: Bone regeneration performance of surface-treated porous titanium. Biomaterials. 35:6172–6181. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nune KC, Kumar A, Murr LE and Misra RD: Interplay between self-assembled structure of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) and osteoblast functions in three-dimensional titanium alloy scaffolds: Stimulation of osteogenic activity. J Biomed Mater Res A. 104:517–532. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pan S, Yin J, Yu L, Zhang C, Zhu Y, Gao Y and Chen Y: 2D MXene-Integrated 3D-Printing scaffolds for augmented osteosarcoma phototherapy and accelerated tissue reconstruction. Adv Sci (Weinh). 7:19015112019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D and Giannoudis PV: Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 9:662011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang Z, Wang C, Li C, Qin Y, Zhong L, Chen B, Li Z, Liu H, Chang F and Wang J: Analysis of factors influencing bone ingrowth into three-dimensional printed porous metal scaffolds: A review. J Alloy Compound. 717:271–285. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bai H, Cui Y, Wang C, Wang Z, Luo W, Liu Y, Leng Y, Wang J, Li Z and Liu H: 3D printed porous biomimetic composition sustained release zoledronate to promote osteointegration of osteoporotic defects. Mater Des. 189:1085132020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ye D, Xu Y, Wang G, Feng X, Fu T, Zhang H, Jiang L and Bai Y: Thermal effects of 2450 MHz microwave exposure near a titanium alloy plate implanted in rabbit limbs. Bioelectromagnetics. 36:309–318. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vayron R, Nguyen VH, Lecuelle B, Albini Lomami H, Meningaud JP, Bosc R and Haiat G: Comparison of resonance frequency analysis and of quantitative ultrasound to assess dental implant osseointegration. Sensors (Basel). 18:13972018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liang H, Liu X, Pi Y, Yu Q, Yin Y, Li X, Yang Y and Tian J: 3D-Printed β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold combined with a pulse electromagnetic field promotes the repair of skull defects in rats. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 5:5359–5367. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu C, Yu J, Yang Y, Tang X, Zhao D, Zhao W and Wu H: Effect of 1 mT sinusoidal electromagnetic fields on proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 34:453–464. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tsai MT, Chang WH, Chang K, Hou RJ and Wu TW: Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in bone tissue engineering. Bioelectromagnetics. 28:519–528. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang P, Liu J, Yang Y, Zhai M, Shao X, Yan Z, Zhang X, Wu Y, Cao L, Sui B, et al: Differential intensity-dependent effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on RANKL-induced osteoclast formation, apoptosis, and bone resorbing ability in RAW264.7 cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 38:602–612. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adie S, Harris IA, Naylor JM, Rae H, Dao A, Yong S and Ying V: Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation for acute tibial shaft fractures: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 93:1569–1576. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bagnato GL, Miceli G, Marino N, Sciortino D and Bagnato GF: Pulsed electromagnetic fields in knee osteoarthritis: A double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 55:755–762. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yin Y, Chen P, Yu Q, Peng Y, Zhu Z and Tian J: The effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells. Med Sci Monit. 24:3274–3282. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Qiao S, Sheng Q, Li Z, Wu D, Zhu Y, Lai HC and Gu Y: 3D-printed Ti6Al4V scaffolds coated with freeze-dried platelet-rich plasma as bioactive interface for enhancing osseointegration in osteoporosis. Mater Des. 194:1088252020. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bai H, Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang Z, Wang J and Liu H, Feng Y, Lin Q, Li Z and Liu H: Enhanced osseointegration of three-dimensional supramolecular bioactive interface through osteoporotic microenvironment regulation. Theranostics. 10:4779–4794. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Wang C, Li C, Wang Z, Yang F, Liu H, Qin Y and Wang J: What we have achieved in the design of 3D printed metal implants for application in orthopedics? Personal experience and review. Rapid Prototyp J. 24:1365–1379. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Raphel J, Holodniy M, Goodman SB and Heilshorn SC: Multifunctional coatings to simultaneously promote osseointegration and prevent infection of orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 84:301–314. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kumar A, Nune KC and Misra RDK: Design and biological functionality of a novel hybrid Ti-6Al-4V/hydrogel system for reconstruction of bone defects. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 12:1133–1144. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang C, Peng S, Li J, Lu J, Guan D, Jiang F, Lu C, Li F, He X, Zhu H, et al: Inhibition of osteoblastic Smurf1 promotes bone formation in mouse models of distinctive age-related osteoporosis. Nat Commun. 9:34282018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang X, Zhu Y, Cao L, Wang X, Zheng A, Chang J, Wu J, Wen J, Jiang X, Li H and Zhang Z: Alginate-aker injectable composite hydrogels promoted irregular bone regeneration through stem cell recruitment and osteogenic differentiation. J Mater Chem B. 6:1951–1964. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Feng YF, Wang L, Zhang Y, Li X, Ma ZS, Zou JW, Lei W and Zhang ZY: Effect of reactive oxygen species overproduction on osteogenesis of porous titanium implant in the present of diabetes mellitus. Biomaterials. 34:2234–2243. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao Y, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Liu H, Song S, Wang C, Li Z, Yang Z, Liu H, Wang J, Yang B and Lin Q: Biomimetic composite scaffolds to manipulate stem cells for aiding rheumatoid arthritis management. Adv Funct Mater. 29:18078602019. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yi H, Ur Rehman F, Zhao C, Liu B and He N: Recent advances in nano scaffolds for bone repair. Bone Res. 4:160502016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee BN, Hong JU, Kim SM, Jang JH, Chang HS, Hwang YC, Hwang IN and Oh WM: Anti-inflammatory and osteogenic effects of calcium silicate-based root canal sealers. J Endod. 45:73–78. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sivashanmugam A, Charoenlarp P, Deepthi S, Rajendran A, Nair SV, Iseki S and Jayakumar R: Injectable shear-thinning CaSO(4)/FGF-18-Incorporated Chitin-PLGA hydrogel enhances bone regeneration in mice cranial bone defect model. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 9:42639–42652. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rashdan NA, Sim AM, Cui L, Phadwal K, Roberts FL, Carter R, Ozdemir DD, Hohenstein P, Hung J, Kaczynski J, et al: Osteocalcin regulates arterial calcification via altered wnt signaling and glucose metabolism. J Bone Miner Res. 35:357–367. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ho SS, Vollmer NL, Refaat MI, Jeon O, Alsberg E, Lee MA and Leach JK: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 promotes human mesenchymal stem cell survival and resultant bone formation when entrapped in photocrosslinked alginate hydrogels. Adv Healthc Mater. 5:2501–2509. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bagheri L, Pellati A, Rizzo P, Aquila G, Massari L, De Mattei M and Ongaro A: Notch pathway is active during osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induced by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 12:304–315. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhou YJ, Wang P, Chen HY, Liu C, Ji QD, Yang XT, Gao Q and He CQ: Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on osteogenic differentiation and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 46:347–353. 2015.(In Chinese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Selvamurugan N, He Z, Rifkin D, Dabovic B and Partridge NC: Pulsed electromagnetic field regulates MicroRNA 21 expression to activate TGF-β signaling in human bone marrow stromal cells to enhance osteoblast differentiation. Stem Cells Int. 2017:24503272017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rachner TD, Khosla S and Hofbauer LC: Osteoporosis: Now and the future. Lancet. 377:1276–1287. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ehnert S, Schröter S, Aspera-Werz RH, Eisler W, Falldorf K, Ronniger M and Nussler AK: Translational insights into extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields (ELF-PEMF) for bone regeneration after trauma and orthopedic surgery. J Clin Med. 8:20282019. View Article : Google Scholar |